Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
This chapter presents, analyze and interprets the data gathered from the
the respondents in terms of age, gender, civil status, occupation, stage of CKD,
Table 1.1. Age of the Respondents in the Morning and other shifts of
Hemodialysis.
y e y e
18-35 years
1 10% 2 20%
old
36-45 years
3 30% 2 20%
old
46-65 years
6 60% 5 50%
old
65 years old
0 0% 1 10%
and above
Total 10 100% 10 100%
Table 1.1 above shows that the age of the respondents both in the
old. Six out of 10 respondents in the morning-shift HD are between the ages of
46-65 years old, which comprises 60% of the total respondents. Another 3
(30%) respondents are between the ages of 36-45. While only 1 out of 10
Fifty percent of the respondents in the other- shift HD are also between
the ages 46-65 years old. Two of respondents (20%) are between the ages 18-
35 and another 2 out of 10 (20%) are between the ages 36-45. While only 1 out
Hemodialysis.
y e y e
Table 1.2 above presents the gender of the respondents both in the
morning-shift HD are male, which is 80% of the total respondents. While the
remaining 20% of the respondents are females. The other shifts of HD comprise
of Hemodialysis.
y e y e
Widow/ed 1 10% 0 0%
Divorced/
0 0% 0 0%
Annulled
Total 10 100% 10 100%
Table 1.3 above presents the frequency and percentage of Civil Status
While 40% (F=4) of the respondents are single. And the remaining 10% (F=1)
shift HD are married with an 80%, while the remaining respondents (F=2) are
of Hemodialysis.
y e y e
Business 1 10% 0 0%
Clerical 0 0% 2 20%
respondents (20%) work in the service industry and the remaining 2 (20%) are
HD are unemployed. While 20% (F=2) work as clericals, 10% (F=1) work as
y e y e
Stage 1 0 0% 0 0%
Stage 3 1 10% 0 0%
Stage 4 0 0% 0 0%
hemodialysis. Majority of the respondents (F=8) are in the fifth stage of CKD.
While 10% (F=1) of the respondent is in the second stage of CKD and the
remaining 10% (F=1) of respondent is in the third stage of CKD. Majority of the
respondents (F=6) in the other-shift HD are from the afternoon shift HD with a
60% and are scheduled HD twice a week. While the remaining respondents
(F=4) are from the night shift HD with a 40% and are schedule HD trice a week.
Majority of the respondents (F=8) are in the fifth stages of CKD. While 10%
(F=1) of the respondent is in the first stage of CKD and the remaining 10%
1x 1 10% 0 0%
2x 1 10% 6 60%
3x 6 60% 4 40%
4x 1 10% 0 0%
5x 1 10% 0 0%
percent (F=6) of the respondents have HD thrice a week. While 10% (F=1)
have HD once a week, 10% (F=1) have HD twice a week, 10% (F=1) have HD
four times a week and the remaining 10% (F=1) have HD five times a week.
Table 1.7.1. Coffee intake of the Respondents in the Morning and other
shifts of Hemodialysis.
No 4 40% 9 60%
Table 1.7.2. Cups of Coffee intake of the Respondents in the Morning and
Table 1.7 above presents the frequency and percentage of the coffee
consumes coffee with the range of 1-5 cups which is 60% of the respondents.
While the remaining respondents (n=4) do not consume coffee, which is 40% of
the respondents. Majority of the respondents (f=9, 90%) in the other-shift HD do
not consume coffee, while the remaining respondent one (10%) respondent
of Hemodialysis.
Yes 0 0% 0 0%
No 10 100% 10 100%
Table 1.8 above presents the frequency and percentage of Tea intake of
the respondents both in the morning-shift and other shifts of hemodialysis. The
table shows that no respondent in both morning and other shifts of hemodialysis
drinks tea. Which means that 10 out of 10 respondents (100%) in the morning
Yes 2 20% 1 0%
No 8 80% 9 60%
smoke cigarettes. While the remaining respondents (F=2) smoke cigarettes. 50%
(F=1) of the respondent who do smoke cigarettes smoke a range of 1-10 sticks
of cigarettes a day and the remaining 50% (F=1) of respondent smoke more than
10 sticks of cigarettes a day. Majority of the respondents (F=9) in the other-shift
tea consumption and cigarette smoking to the sleep quality index of the
patients?
are the age, gender, civil status, occupation, stage of CKD, frequency of
hemodialysis treatment, coffee intake, tea intake, and cigarette smoking to the
Variables p-value
Age 0.171b
Gender 0.494b
Occupation 0.320b
Stage of 0.665b
Chronic Kidney
Disease
Frequency of 0.582b
hemodialysis
Coffee intake 0.035b
between coffee intake and sleep quality of the respondents. These findings show
that majority of respondents who drinks coffee had a poor sleep quality and those
quality.
Variables p-value
Sleep 0.103
Disturbances
Sleep Latency 0.234
Table 2.2 above shows the relationship of the age of the respondents and
their sleep quality. Pearson
Table 2.3. Test of Relationship of the Gender of respondents and their
Sleep quality.
Variables p-value
Sleep 0.820
Disturbances
Sleep Latency 0.161
Table 2.3 above shows the relationship of the gender of the respondents and
their sleep quality. chi
Table 2.4. Test of Relationship of the Civil Status of respondents and their
Sleep quality.
Variables p-value
Sleep 0.371
Disturbances
Sleep Latency 0.374
Day 0.034
Dysfunction
Sleep Efficiency 0.260
Table 2.4 above shows the relationship of the civil status of the respondents and
their sleep quality.
Table 2.5. Test of Relationship of the Occupation of respondents and their
Sleep quality.
Variables p-value
Sleep 0.710
Disturbances
Sleep Latency 0.196
Table 2.5 above shows the relationship of the occupation of the respondents and
their sleep quality.
Table 2.6. Test of Relationship of the Stage of Chronic Kidney Disease of
Variables p-value
Sleep 0.405
Disturbances
Sleep Latency 0.547
Table 2.6 above shows the relationship of the stage of Chronic Kidney Disease
of the respondents and their sleep quality.
Table 2.7. Test of Relationship of the Frequency of Hemodialysis
Variables p-value
Sleep 0.472
Disturbances
Sleep Latency 0.673
Variables p-value
Sleep 0.134
Disturbances
Sleep Latency 0.099
Day 0.020
Dysfunction
Sleep Efficiency 0.061
Table 2.8 above shows the relationship of coffee consumption of the respondents
and their sleep quality.
Table 2.9. Test of Relationship of Number cups of Coffee consumed by
Variables p-value
Sleep 0.050
Disturbances
Sleep Latency 0.033
Day 0.022
Dysfunction
Sleep Efficiency 0.066
Table 2.8 above shows the relationship of cups of coffee consumed by the
respondents per day and their sleep quality.
Table 2.10. Test of Relationship of Cigarette smoking to the respondents
Sleep quality.
Variables p-value
Sleep 0.105
Disturbances
Sleep Latency 0.450
Table 2.10 above shows the relationship of cigarette smoking to the respondents
sleep quality.
Table 2.11. Test of Relationship of sticks of Cigarette consumed by
Variables p-value
Sleep 0.264
Disturbances
Sleep Latency 0.793
Table 2.8 above shows the relationship of sticks of cigarette consumed by the
respondents per day and their sleep quality.
Problem 3a: What is the sleep quality measures of the patients undergoing
hemodialysis one month before and after the session in the Morning-shift
hemodialysis?
Morning-shift
Sleep Quality
Interpretatio Post Interpretatio
Measures Pretest
n test n
Sleep Duration
(score) 0.1 Very Good 0.3 Very Good
(in hours) 8.3 hrs. 7.25
hrs.
Sleep Duration
(score) 1.5 Once or 1.7 Once or
twice a week twice a week
1.6 1.57
Wake up in the Once or Once or
middle of the twice a week twice a week
night or early 1.4 2.12
morning Less than Once or
once a week twice a week
Have to get up to
use the bathroom 1.9 1.4
Once or Once or
twice a week twice a week
Cannot breathe 0.9 1.8
comfortably
Less than Less than
0.8 once a week 1.38 once a week
Cough or snore
loudly Less than Less than
once a week once a week
1.16 1.6
Once or
Feel too cold Less than twice a week
0.5 once a week
Less than
Not during 1.2 once a week
Feel too hot 1.21 the past
month Once or
1.5 twice a week
Less than
Have bad dreams 0.9 once a week Less than
once a week
Less than 0.9
once a week
Have pain
\
Other
reasons________
Sleep Latency
(score) 0.9 Good 1.4 Good
Difficulty keeping
up enthusiasm to
get things done
Sleep Efficiency 0.1 Very Good 0.4 Very Good
Overall Sleep 1.5 Bad 1.9 Bad
Quality
Need Meds to 0.9 Less than 1.3 Less than
Sleep once a week once a week
Table 3.1 shows the average sleep quality measure scores of the
The interpretation of each values is also included in the table. During pretest in
the morning shift, respondents often experience some sleep disturbances which
includes being awake in the middle of the night or early morning and cannot
breathe comfortably that they experience mostly ones or twice a week. They
also have a bad overall sleep quality as rated by the respondents. Respondents
also have an average of 19 minutes sleep latency for less than once a week.
also seldom take meds in order for them to sleep. And they have a very good
experience sleep disturbances which includes being awake in the middle of the
night or early morning, have to get up to use the bathroom, having cough and
snores loudly, feels too hot and experience pain. And just like in the pretest,
respondents also have a bad overall sleep quality as stated by the respondents.
Respondents also have an average of 32 minutes sleep latency for less than
sleepiness which includes difficulty staying awake while driving, eating meals or
they also experience difficulty keeping up enthusiasm to get things done. Just
like in pretest, the respondents also seldom take meds in order for them to sleep.
And they have a very good sleep efficiency and sleep duration with an average
of 7.25 hours.
Table 3.2. Frequency of Sleep quality index of the respondents in
during pretest and the remaining 30% (F=3) had a good sleep quality. While
during the post test, majority of the respondents (F=6) had a poor sleep quality
undergoing hemodialysis one month before and after the session in the
Table 3.3. Average Sleep quality measures of the patients in the other
Other shifts
Sleep Quality Pretest Post test
Measures Score Interpretatio Score Interpretatio
(Mean) n (Mean) n
Sleep Duration
(score) 0.1 Very Good 0.3 Very Good
(in hours) 8.1 hrs. 7.8 hrs.
Sleep
Disturbance 1.8 Once or 1.3 Less than
(score) twice a week once a week
1.8 1.1
Once or Less than
Wake up in the twice a week once a week
middle of the 2 1.5
night or early Once or Less than
morning twice a week once a week
0.9 0.8
Have to get up to Less than Less than
use the bathroom once a week once a week
1.7 1
Once or Less than
Cannot breathe twice a week once a week
comfortably 1 0.4
Less than Not during
once a week the past
Cough or snore month
loudly 1.5 0.4
Once or Not during
twice a week the past
month
Feel too cold 1.1 Less than 0.1
once a week Not during
the past
1.8 Once or 1.5 month
Feel too hot twice a week
Once or
Not during twice a week
0.6 the past 0.6
Have bad dreams month Not during
the past
month
Have pain
\
Other
reasons________
Sleep Latency
(score) 1.7 Bad 0.8 Good
(in minutes) 30 mins 10.7
mins
(frequency) 1.9 Once or 1.1 Less than
twice a week once a week
Day Dysfunction
(score) 1.5 Bad 0.7 Good
Difficulty keeping
up enthusiasm to
get things done
Sleep Efficiency 0.4 Very Good 0 Very Good
Overall Sleep 2.2 Bad 0.9 Good
Quality
Need Meds to 0.9 Less than 0.8 Less than
Sleep once a week once a week
Table 3.2 shows the average sleep quality measure scores of the
The interpretation of each values is also included in the table. During the other-
shifts pretest, the respondents have a very good sleep duration, with an
average of 8.1 hours, and very good sleep efficiency. The respondents often
snoring loudly, feeling hot, and pain, while having the seldom need medications
to sleep. The respondents have a bad sleep latency with an average time of 30
while driving, eating meals, or engaging in social activity and difficulty keeping
up with enthusiasm to get things done. Overall sleep quality of the respondents
pretest is bad.
While during the posttest, the respondents have a fairly good overall
sleep quality. The respondents sleep duration is very good with an average of
7.8 hours. Sleep disturbances are seldom experienced, but show an often
while seldom needing medications to sleep. Sleep latency is fairly good with an
average of 10.7 minutes experienced less than once a week. Day dysfunction
is very good with the seldom occurrence of difficulty staying awake while
driving, eating meals, or engaging in social activity and sleep. Sleep efficiency
Good between pre- and posttest scores. The findings found between the pre-
significant difference from bad to good. And needs meds to sleep is interpreted
from bad to good. There is a significant change in pretest and posttest of sleep
efficiency and is interpreted as very good. While the sleep latency is interpreted
as good both pretest and posttest. It is noteworthy that the pretest and posttest
Eighty percent of the respondents (F=8) had a poor sleep quality during
pretest and the remaining 20% (F=2) had a good sleep quality. While during the
post test, majority of the respondents (F=8) had a good sleep quality and the
remaining 20% (F=2) had a poor sleep quality. The findings indicate that after
patients undergoing hemodialysis one month before and after the session
Table 4.1 above shows the difference between Sleep quality measures of
general, the results showed that there were no significant differences in the pretest
There might have been other variables that caused the changes. These variables
can be the symptomsdry skin, itching, difficulty sleeping, feeling tired or lack of
energy, trouble falling asleep, decrease interest in sex, etc.associated with End-
Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), in which majority of our patients have. Poor sleep
quality can also be associated with changes in lifestyle and activities of daily living
due to disease limitations and treatments (Wang, et al., 2016). Mental health of
Chronic Kidney Disease patients affects the sleep quality measures especially the
sleep efficiency, subjective (overall) sleep quality, and use of sleep medications
Posttest
Pretest p-Value
Good Poor
Sleep
Good (n=3) 1 (33%) 2 (66%)
Quality 1.000
Poor (n=7) 3 (43%) 4 (57%)
Table 4.2 shows the McNemars results of Pretest and Posttest Sleep
Good sleep quality, four respondents remained having Poor sleep quality index
and only one respondents sleep quality remained Good. On the other hand, two
respondents had a negative change from Good sleep quality to Poor sleep
quality. McNemar's test determined that there was no significant difference in the
improvement or decline in sleep quality index. The same results were found by
Cheng et al. wherein no association was found with subjective sleep quality (PSQI
scores) and hemodialysis timing. He, however, found that age, gender and length
of dialysis treatment were significantly related with poor sleep quality. Trbojevi
also formulated the same conclusion when he found no significant relationship with
sleep quality and hemodialysis shifting. But he found out that age, female gender,
and depression level are the factors that causes significant changes in subjective
shifts. The same finding was utilized by Thompson in 2013, wherein she inferred
morning-shift hemodialysis is significantly related with better sleep quality and that
presence of anxiety, depression and tea drinking is associated with poorer sleep
quality.
Problem 4b: Is there a significant difference in the sleep quality measures
of the patients undergoing hemodialysis one month before and after the
Quality
Table 4.3 above shows the difference between Sleep quality measures of
the respondents during pretest and posttest in other shifts of Hemodialysis. It can
be seen that the Sleep latency (t(9)=-2.586, p=0.029), Sleep efficiency (t(9)=-
the respondents are dialyzed at their usual sleep time. This causes a decrease in
sleep (onset) latency, improving the sleep efficiency and therefore, enhancing
patients subjective sleep quality (Cengic, Resic, Spasovski, Avdic, &
Alajbegovic, 2012).
evidence to reject the null, therefore, we fail to reject the null. Thus, we wont be
able to conclude that the other shifts caused improvements or decline in the
following measures. There might also have been extraneous variables that
affected the sleep quality measures of the respondents, and were not assessed
by the tool, such as energy drinks in the morning that will prevent daytime
sleepiness by increasing the caffeine and sugar level in the blood, which is vital
for the Circadian clock to keep us awake (Science Answers, Why Do Energy
Drinks Make Me Tired?, 2017). The insignificant difference in the change of Day
Dysfunction score may have been because of the Very Good or long sleep
duration time that is already present in the respondents in pretest that continued
until posttest.
Hemodialysis.
PSQI Scores
Sleep Quality (Posttest)
Index p-Value
(Pretest) Good Poor
Good 2 0
0.031
Poor 6 2
Table 4.4 shows the McNemars results of Pretest and Posttest Sleep quality index
from poor sleep quality to good sleep quality. While two respondents had a
constant Good sleep quality and the other two remained Poor. The table above
shows that there is a significant difference (p=0.031) in the Sleep Quality index
scores of pretest and posttest in the other-shift HD. This is related to the overall
improvement of the sleep quality measures of the respondents in the other shifts.
Koch et.al showed that hemodialysis increases body temperature, and this
the hemodialysis treatment, corresponds with the usual time of sleep of individual,
worsened the patients quality of sleep. One reason is the distance of the dialysis
center to the house of the patient that may delay their sleep onset leading to
compromised sleep. One-third to half of these patients were also found to have
sleep apnea which that may have caused decrease in sleep quality (Bathla,
hemodialysis shifts?
pretest.
Table 5.1 shows the test of difference between Sleep quality measures of the
According to the result of the statistical test, no significant finding was noted. This
indicates that the null Ho will not be rejected. The sleep quality measures of the
respondents in the morning-shift and other shifts of Hemodialysis are equal and
are comparable.
Table 5.2. Test of Difference between Sleep quality index of the
pretest.
*Note: Review the results. Use Fishers Exact Sig for n<5.
Sleep
Quality Morning- Other p-
Total 2 df
Index shift shifts value
(Pretest)
Good 3 2 5
Poor 7 8 15 1 0.606
0.267
Total 10 10 20
Table 5.2 shows the test of difference between Sleep quality index of the
According to the result of the statistical test, no significant finding was noted. This
indicates that the null Ho will not be rejected. The sleep quality measures of the
respondents in the morning-shift and other shifts of Hemodialysis are equal and
are comparable.
Table 5.3. Test of Difference between Sleep quality measures of the
posttest.
Quality
Table 5.3 shows the test of difference between Sleep quality measures of the
posttest.
Sleep
Quality Morning- Other p-
Total 2 df
Index shift shifts value
(Pretest)
Good 4 8 12
Poor 6 2 8 1 0.068
3.333
Total 10 10 20
Table 5.4 shows the test of difference between Sleep quality index of the