Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
com
FinQuiz.com
CFA Level II Item-set - Solution
Study Session 5
June 2017
Statement 2 is incorrect. Under U.S. GAAP, unamortized past service costs are reported in
accumulated other comprehensive income and subsequently amortized over the average service lives
of the affected employees; the amortized amounts are included in the income statement.
U.S. GAAP only allows the deferred recognition of actuarial gains and losses using either the corridor
method or the faster recognition method to determine the minimum amount to be reported on the
income statement. Park has defined only the corridor method; under the faster recognition method the
actuarial gains and losses can be amortized more quickly.
Statement 4 is incorrect. An increase in life expectancy will have no effect on the promised pension
payments because the payments are to be paid over a fixed time period.
Total periodic pension costs = ($25,670 $24,586) ($19,615 $18,956) $65 = $360
*Net return on plan assets = Actual return (Plan assets Interest rate)
Under U.S. GAAP the amount recognized under a defined benefit plan is the pension plans funded
status. The funded status represents the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the
projected benefit obligation (present value of the pension liabilities). If the projected benefit
obligation exceeds the fair value of the plan assets, this suggests that the plan is underfunded.
In the case of Hewer Corporation, the projected obligation as at December 31, 2009 exceeds the fair
value of the corporations plan assets on the same date ($589 million vs. $123 million).
Since the corporation has not made these cash flow adjustments, its operating cash flows are
overstated financing flows are understated for both the periods presented.
Under the corridor method, the net cumulative unrecognized actuarial gains and losses at the
beginning of the reporting period are compared with defined benefit obligation and the fair value of
the plan assets at the beginning of the period.
If this cumulative unrecognized amount exceeds 10% of the greater of the PBO or the fair value of
plan assets, the excess is amortized over the expected average remaining working lives of the
employees participating in the plan and is included as a component of pension expense.
increase in the discount rate to 12.2% in 2010 from 12.1% in 2009, will decrease the value of
the PBO being reported in 2010.
decrease in the actual return on plan assets to 8.5% will not affect the PBO amount as actual
return on plan assets are not used in the PBO computation.
increase in the rate of compensation increases to 3.8% in 2010 from 3.5% in 2009 will
increase the value of PBO being reported in 2010.
For the year 2008, the compensation expense recognized is $360 million ($540 million 1.5 years).
For the year 2009, the compensation expense recognized is $180 million ($540 million $360
million).
Since the sponsors contributions exceed the total pension costs, the excess is equivalent to a
repayment on a loan in excess of the scheduled payment (financing use of funds). This excess is
treated as an increase in cash inflow from operating activities and an increase in cash outflow from
financing activities by $7,069. Put another way, the $7,069 excess is treated as a decrease in cash
outflow from operating activities and a decrease in cash inflow from financing activities.
Total periodic pension costs (income) = Ending funded status Employer contributions beginning
funded status.
Thus the potential for risk aversion is limited and the potential for returns is unlimited on the upside.
This benefit accurately reflects a benefit of issuing stock to firm employees.
Benefit 2:
Although the issuance of stock option will dilute shareholder ownership in the future, as the options
are exercised and underlying shares are issued, the firm does not simultaneously issues shares with its
stock options issue. Regardless of whether the stock options dilute shareholdings immediately or in
the future, the firms existing shareholders will be affected by the issue once the options are exercised
(and associated shares issued). Thus benefit 2 does not accurately reflect a benefit of issuing stock
options to existing firm shareholders.
Benefit 3:
When stock options are issued an annual compensation expense in recorded on the firms income
statement thereby reducing the firms profitability. Additionally, stock options can dilute the firms
earnings per share. Thus the issuance of stock options can reduce the firms overall profitability as
well an individual shareholders share in firm profitability. Benefit 3 misrepresents the benefit as well
as effect of issuing stock options on firm profitability.
When a company reports a surplus, the amount that can be reported as an asset is the lower of the
surplus and asset ceiling (present value of future economic benefits, such as refunds or reductions in
future contributions). Since the value of the ceiling ($54,500,000) is greater than the surplus, the asset
will be reported at the surplus amount.
When a company reports a surplus, the amount that can be reported as an asset is the lower of the
surplus and asset ceiling (present value of future economic benefits, such as refunds or reductions in
future contributions). Since the value of the ceiling ($54,500,000) is greater than the surplus, the asset
will be reported at the surplus amount.
Service costs include current and past service costs. The former is immediately recognized in profit
and loss while the latter is included in other comprehensive income and subsequently amortized to
profit and loss.