Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Abstract. In this paper, the problem of designing a servo system for Surface Effect Ship
applications, based upon a centrifugal fan complemented with an Inlet Guide Vane (IGV),
is considered. An IGV-fan system, at constant fan speed, can be regarded as a single-input
(the opening of the intake valve) single-output (the delivered air flow) dynamical system,
affected by a measurable disturbance (the pressure at the output). The IGV-fan system is
characterised by non-trivial non-linearities. For the servo design, a back-box direct method
which makes use of I/O measurement only has been used. Such a method provides
satisfactory performances when used for the design of the approximate inverse of the IGV-
fan system. Copyright ~ 2000 IFAC
Key words. Surface Effect Ship; Inlet Guide Vanes; nonlinear systems; inverse system.
601
only option for dynamic vanatlon is to modifv the duct (it commonly happens that quite a long air duct
fan's geometric characteristics at constant shaft speed. separates the output of the fan from the air cushion
A possibility is to act on the air-intake system, by plenum; the air accumulation within such a duct is the
using the so-called Inlet Guide Vanes (IGVs). This main responsible of the dynamical behaviour of the
has been recently explored e.g. in Eden and Cox overalllGV-fan system).
(1995).
In this paper. we deal with the problem of designing a chamber
pI'
Fig.2. A centrifugal fan complemented with an IGV Air chamber: --(-) Pe(t) = q,(t) - q"u,(t): (I d)
,"P: t
system, for S.E.S. applications.
Ollllet diffuser. q,,,,,(r) = A"u,~2p(p:(t) - P, (t). (le)
2. THE lGV-FAN SYSTEM
As can be seen, the above system is constituted by
The IGV-fan system this paper deals with is
three algebraic relations Ia). (I b), and (I e, and by
schematically depicted in Fig.2. It is constituted by an two differential equations le) and (Id.
Inlet Guide I'one (IGV), a centrifugal/an. and an air Correspondingly. q, and P: are the system state
602
variables, A Ii ;,' is the control input, q",,, is the output tangent model of (I) around a steady-state condition.
and we have tested via numerical simulations the
variable, and p, is the measurable disturbance.
performance achievable by the servo system designed
It is worth noticing that, in the case of the IGV-fan on a linear-approximation basis.
servo system, finding a reliable first principle model Given an equilibrium condition of (\) (characterised
is still a controversial issue. In this regard we point
out that the "first-principle" model (I) will be used by q, = q"III' pz, P" and A/0 ,), the first-order
here only as a simulated test plant for a number of (linear) approximation of the model (I) can be easily
different goals. derived as follows (below, given a variable x, the
symbol &- denotes the difference between the actual
The main objective of the servo we wish to design is
value of x and its nominal steady-state value, x):
the "standard" servo-systems goal, namely to make
the relationship between the desired value of the (2a)
output variable. say q,ef (t), and the actual output
Jp, -Jpm = K/>q, (2b)
q",,,(t) as close as possible to the identity (over a
suitable frequency range, compatible with the system LSJq, = Jp, -Jp2 (2c)
dynamics). Since the output variable q",,, is not K 4Jp2 = tSq, - tSq"u, (2d)
measurable for control purposes (whereas a reliable
tSq"u' = K sJp, - K SJp2 (2e)
measure of the disturbance is available), the servo
_7
system we propose belongs to the class of the I
feedforward controllers, complemented with a direct K 7 =-~-.
- P A/c;,
compensation of the measurable disturbance (see
FigA).
K] = q(q,)! ' K 4 = P!' , K s =-Au/lI~2(- ~ _)'
About this aspect, a short remark is due. One of the ;q,. '1,=", YfJ2 P2 p,
most common paradigms of control theory is that a
By Laplace transforming (2), an input/output linear
feed forward control structure cannot, in general,
representation of the system (2), can be given as
guarantee the high-performance of a genuine
follows:
feedback controller; nonetheless, it has to be pointed
out that, in this case, the main goal is simply that of Transfer function from JAJ(i" to tSq"u,:
reducing the non-linear and dynamical behaviour of
an IGV-fan system, and not that of obtaining a high-
performance reference-tracking loop. As a matter of (3)
F.",.<s)
fact the IGV-fan system can be regarded as an
actuator of the main feedback control loop (the Ride
Control System Loop) having the aim of reducing the
Transfer functionfram Jp, to tSquu,'-
vertical accelerations of the sh ip.
p,
F;(s)=Ko
IGYFAI'
q"'j
--..
Servo
System .. SYSTEM
(non linear)
q"",
lli\'rt\N I.",}-.AR srRvo SYS"llM 1/,.1')
1. __ . ... __. __._,- -_._ .. __ ._-----"---_._------- -----.,....--------_._,
, .
FigA. Servo system external structure. 'R,(,)=-I'
:. .
(-,i1I
603
order low-pass filter B(s) = fJ2 /(s + fJ)2 . nominal value plus a band-limited (0+2Hz)
signal t5A I01 , constituted by the superposition
We now test the extent to which the linear
of a large number of incorrelated sinusoids.
modelisation provided by these transfer functions are
a fair approximation of our original equations (I). The corresponding output Oq~~:') of the system
The comparison was performed by means of many is compared with the output Oq,~;;,> of the
simulation trials, one of which is presented below. model described by the transfer function (8),
when fed with the same input t5A/0 /. The
Simulation trial selected t5A 1G1 covers the range [- 1.4;5.1],
Consider the model (I) with the following parameter which is the realistic range of variation of the
set (in standard units), IGY intake area (see e.g. Win and Win 1995).
The two outputs are superimposed in Fig.7a.
[P",m,p,y,V,LS,AuJ = [10 130QI.2,1.4,200,256, 8], (5)
and take
"'I
f(qJ = -165870q; + 33030q,. + 15740, (6)
as a centrifugal fan characteristic. In correspondence
to the following steady-state condition
604
(b) Set A/eil constant at its nominal value available; this is why, for control design purposes, it
(OA"il = 0 ) in system (I), and let p, be given is much wiser to rely on methods based on I/O
measurements (see e.g. Guardabassi and Savaresi
by its nominal value plus a band-limited
2000, Nijmeijer and Savaresi 1998, Savaresi and
(0+2Hz) signal op" constituted by the
Guardabassi 1998, and references cited therein) rather
superposition of a large number of than on methods based on an analytic model of the
uncorrelated sinusoids. The corresponding process (see Isidori 1989).
output Oq,~;~J I of the system is compared with The data-based method we propose is very simple,
the output Oq~,;;/ of the model described by the and can be outlined in the following steps:
transfer function (9), when fed with the same Consider the system (I) with the same parameter
input op,. The selected op, covers the set and operating condition (5)-{7) considered in
range [-2000;2000], which is the realistic Sect.3. For digital control purposes the system is
range of variation of the air cushion pressure, complemented with a Zero Order Hold (ZOH)
when the Ride Control System is active. The and two sampling units (with sampling time
two outputs are superimposed in Fig.7b. T, = 0.05), as it is indicated in Fig.8 (for the
From Figs.7, it is apparent that, while the linear sake of conciseness, in the rest of the paper we
will use the symbol x{k) in place of x(T,k), to
approximation is fair for the op, - Oq",,, relationship,
indicate the sampled version of a signal x{t.
the intrinsic non-linearity in the OAJ(il - Oq"u, effect
cannot be neglected. Collect a set of I/O data. To this purpose, the
IGV-fan system (I) has been fed with a test
input, say oA/(il (.), while keeping op, constant
4. NON-LINEAR SERVO DESIGN
and equal to zero. The "test" signal, oA/(;1 (k)
Motivated by the analysis developed in the previous
section, we will now address the problem of (k= I,2, ... ,4000) is a 200 seconds signal
designing a servo system constituted by a genuinely constituted by the sum of a large number of
uncorrelated sinusoids (within the frequency
non-linear inverter of the OA"il' - Oq"UI relationship,
range 0+2Hz) suitably warped to match the
and by a linear compensator of the measurable
range A"iI E D Uil (D/(il = [1.3;7.5]) of the
disturbance p, (the same used in the scheme depicted
IGV intake area; the lower bound of D Uil
in Fig.5). We will focus on a digital implementation
of the servo system. This last choice is motivated both corresponds to the limit of stability of the IGV-
by technological reasons (Il-processor-based fan system (I), while its upper bound is the
controllers have been the subject of an impressive maximum allowed opening area of the IGV-
growth in the last decade, by virtue of their power and valve.
flexibility in implementing control rules), and by Once the test input has been designed, the
control design reasons (the design of black-box second important choice to make is the structure
controllers, on the basis of input/output samples, is of the non-linear inverter. Its general structure
more natural in the realm of discrete-time systems). has been chosen as (NARX model):
Thus, the general scheme of the servo system is that
in Fig.8.
IGY-FAI' SERVO SYSTEM
b".(1)
where g is a parametric function, and iJ is the
parameter vector. The parametric family of non-
linear functions which has been used in this
particular case is the class of the radial basis
networks (see e.g. Binanti and Picci 1996,
IG\r.n bq".A I) Sjoberg 1995). It receives as inputs the current
bq~~ Non-/lnrar ~ non-linc:lf
value of the reference signal (the measured
-U
"'n,!,hn,
t
L
Inn'rler
-' ZOH
s:,-Sh:m
605
REFERENCES
Bertin, D., S. Binanti, S.M. Savaresi (2000). "The
As for the complexity of the controller, we have seen decoupled cushion control in ride control systems
that a good compromise between performance and for air cushion catamarans". Control Engineering
optimization complexity is given by a=4. Practice (to appear).
Finally, we have tested the performance of the entire Bertin D., Bittanti S., Savaresi S. (1997).
"non-linear" servo system depicted in Fig.8. "Coordinated Control of IGV and Valve in a Ride
Precisely, with reference to the scheme of Fig.8, the Control System for S.E.S.". International
block labelled as "Non-linear inverter" is replaced by Conference on High Speed Marine Vehicles
the function g designed via the method described (HSMV'97), Naples, March 18-21, pp.8.3-8.14.
above, and the block labelled as "op, compensator" is Binanti, S. and Picci, G. (Eds.) (1996). Identification,
the digital counterpart of the transfer function (9). Adaptation, Learning - the Science of Building
Two band limited (072Hz) signals, 8qref..t) and 8Pc(t) Models from Data. Springer- Verlag.
were injected in the servo system, and the Butler, E.A (1995). "The Surface Effect Ship". Naval
correspondent output, 8qout(t), was recorded for Engineers Journal, Chapter IV, special edition,
t E [0;50]. In Fig.IO the reference signal (8qref..t February 1985.
and the measured output (8qour(t are compared. It is
Eden, CB., and Cox, Mol. (1995). "Investigation of
apparent that, despite the non-trivial non-linear
Fan Characteristic and Fan Type". AIR
behaviour of the IGV-fan system, and despite the
VEHICLES, Technical Report MAINCOMPSES
disturbance due to deviations of the cushion pressure
TEC/21/BOO I/O 1/09,28/3/1995.
from its nominal value, the output of the servo system
accurately tracks the reference signal. Fossen, T.I (1994). Guidance and Control of Ocean
Vehicles. Wiley & Sons.
- .- - --
~
-
11
-i Guardabassi G.O., Savaresi S.M. (2000). "Virtual
.- Ai
,
I\~
f----
I VI r ! ,\t~M
l Reference Direct Design Method: a Novel
Approach to Data-Based Control System Design".
- /\1 ~ I
I~ 1\ IEEE Trans. On Automatic Control (to appear).
0
, ---
~.
'--
.. ..-
- - - -- - --
J V
-
T--
-+--
Isidori, A. (1989).
Springer Verlag.
Nonlinear Control Systems.
.. ---t---
, -- ---- -- --- - - - - - - - - Nijmeijer H., Savaresi S.M. (1998). "On Approximate
, ., Model-reference control of SISO discrete-time
" " " " " " " " non linear systems". Automatica, vol.34, no.IO,
Fig.IO.The reference signal Oqref..t) (dashed line) and pp. I261-1266.
the measured output Oqout(t) (continuous line. Osbome, W.C (1985). Fans. Pergamon Press.
Notice the almost perfect overlapping between
Savaresi S.M., Guardabassi G.O. (1998).
the two signals.
"Approximate I/O feedback Linearization of
Discrete-Time Non-Linear Systems Via Virtual
5. CO CLUSIONS Input Direct Design". Automatica, vol.34, n.6,
pp.715-722.
In this paper, the problem of designing a servo system
based upon a centrifugal fan complemented with an Sjoberg, J. (1995). Non-Linear System Identification
Inlet Guide Vane, for S.E.S. applications, has been with Neural Networks. PhD Thesis, Linkoping
addressed. It has been shown that one of the main University, Sweden.
problems connected with the servo system design is S0rensen, A.J., and O. Egeland (1995). "Design of
that of coping with the non-trivial non-linearities of Ride Control System for Surface Effect Ships
the IGV-fan system. To this purpose, an easy-to-use using Dissipative Control". Automatica, Vol.31,
and efficient method for the approximate inversion of No.2, pp.183-199.
a non-linear plant has been presented, and applied to
Win, H., and Witt, K.C (1995). "Recent Experience
the design of a non-linear part of the servo.
with Parallel Operating Lift Fans in SES".
This work, however, is only preliminary. Both the FAST'95, pp.1223-1235.
issues of the robustness with respect to parameter
variations and the dynamic behaviour of the overall
closed-loop system have not been addressed in this
work. However, the high-performance results
obtained in the simplified (but genuinely non-linear)
setting considered here are quite encouraging with
respect to the potentiality of the proposed technique.
606