Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
*Developmental Pediatrics, San Antonio Military Pediatric Center, San Antonio, TX; Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas
Health Science Center at San Antonio; Department of Pediatrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda,
MD.
environment (Table 5). (2) Regardless of its origins, it BMI below the fth percentile. Failure to thrive usually
affects the parent-child dyad and often evolves into a be- results from inadequate energy intake but may reect inad-
havioral problem. Older children may experience low equate nutrient absorption or increased energy require-
self-esteem and social isolation. ments. Although growth charts exist for specic conditions,
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Evaluation of Feeding Disorders recommend that practitioners use the World Health Orga-
Initial evaluation of feeding disorders begins with the pri- nization growth standards to monitor growth for infants
mary care practitioner, who should assess parental coping, and children ages 0 to 2 years in the United States (avail-
mental health, and bonding. Most parents whose children able at http://www.cdc.gov/GrowthCharts/who_charts.
have feeding disorders describe feeling frustrated and dis- htm) and CDC growth charts to monitor growth for chil-
tressed at mealtime. The growth chart (length, weight, dren ages 2 to 20 years in the United States (available at
and weight-length ratio [W/L], or body mass index http://www.cdc.gov/GrowthCharts/cdc_charts.htm).
[BMI]) should be reviewed. True failure to thrive is a sus- A thorough review of the childs prenatal, birth, and
tained decrease in growth velocity, best dened as a W/L or medical histories should focus on the following key areas:
Disorder
Factor Result
Conditioned aversion Pairing eating with a painful medical condition or procedure (eg, airway suctioning and
intubation)
Lack of opportunity Delayed introduction of breast, bottle, or solids is associated with delayed attainment of
appropriate eating skills
Positive reinforcement Caretakers coax or bribe infant who bats away the spoon, turns the head away, or cries
Negative reinforcement Caretakers terminate meal when child acts out
Forced feeding Results in aversion to meals and evokes inappropriate behavior at future meals
Overly rigid parents Undermines childs ability to regulate food intake and impairs childs psychosocial development
Chaotic parents Fail to provide child with appropriate food, support, structure, or opportunity to learn to enjoy
a variety of foods or to master eating-related social patterns
Neither should be diagnosed unless symptoms are of an and neurologic development. It may also affect the im-
unusual extent or cause health concerns. (8) (9) mune, skeletal, and cardiovascular systems.
Practitioners should select diagnostic laboratory stud-
Pica disorder. Pica disorder is the recurring ingestion of
ies based on the history and physical examination nd-
nonfood, nonnutritive substances for at least 1 month in
ings. The following are reasonable:
a child at least 2 years of age, which is inappropriate to
the childs developmental level and sociocultural norms. In cases of failure to thrive: complete blood cell count,
Rumination disorder. Rumination disorder is the re- urinalysis, blood urea nitrogen, serum electrolytes, and
peated regurgitation of food for at least 1 month. Re- serologic screening for celiac disease (usually IgA anti-
gurgitated food may be rechewed, reswallowed, or spit bodies to tissue transglutaminase).
out, most often during or shortly after meals. It is not In cases of pica disorder: serum iron and lead levels.
associated with nausea or a medical condition. It is vo-
litional, distinguishing it from vomiting and gastro-
Classification of Feeding Disorders
esophageal reux.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Dis-
orders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), informed by available
Feeding History research and extensive discussion of expert clinical expe-
It is important to have caretakers describe the mealtime en- rience and opinion, takes a lifespan approach to how age
vironment (Table 5) and the childs feeding habits (Table 6). and development affect psychiatric diagnoses. Avoidant/
restrictive food intake disorder replaces the previous term
Feeding Observation feeding disorder of infancy or early childhood (Table 7).
If time and resources allow, the practitioner or clinic Other classication systems exist; however, none is uni-
nurse may observe (in person or by video) the child feed- versally accepted, and few are evidence based.
ing. Such observation allows identication of appropriate
child positioning and posture, the childs hunger and sa-
tiety cues, the caretakers response to and interactions
Management of Feeding Disorders
The long-term goals of treatment are to improve nutritional
with the child, any delayed oral motor or self-feeding
status, growth, feeding safety, and quality of life. Recognition
skills, and difculty managing or tolerating liquids or sol-
and treatment of GERD and constipation are essential. On
ids (eg, oropharyngeal dysphagia).
the basis of ndings, practitioners may consult the following:
A complete physical, neurologic, and oral motor ex-
amination must be performed. The oral motor examina- A pediatric speech-language pathologist to perform
tion includes evaluating facial symmetry, hard and soft a clinical swallowing evaluation coupled with a video
palate for (submucous) cleft, and dentition; symmetry uoroscopic swallow study to evaluate for oral motor
and movement of lips and tongue; vocal intensity, pitch, delay and oropharyngeal dysphagia.
and quality; and cranial nerves. Prolonged inadequate en- A registered pediatric dietitian to assess caloric intake,
ergy and nutrient intake may have broad effects beyond nutritional quality, and dietary practices and to coman-
physical growth, with potential effects on psychomotor age enteral feeds.
A pediatric gastroenterologist to evaluate severe recal- Dietary interventions aim to establish a balanced,
citrant constipation, GERD, and eosinophilic esopha- healthful diet. Because liquids are usually easier than sol-
gitis and to comanage enteral feeds. ids to consume, the tendency is to supplement the diet
A developmental pediatrician to further evaluate for with toddler formula. Often formulas come to replace
contributing causes (eg, global developmental delay, meals, leading to grazing and inadequate energy and nu-
autism spectrum disorder, and parent-child conict). trient intake, further aggravating the childs nutritional
An interdisciplinary feeding team that includes some deciency. Clinicians should thus discourage overreliance
combination of the above professionals along with on toddler formulas and other liquid supplements. Reg-
a clinical child and pediatric psychologist. istered dietitians may recommend nutrient- and energy-
Oral motor skills usually improve over time but can be dense foods and/or specialized formula.
promoted in a more organized and efcient manner with Behavioral feeding therapy is implemented most ap-
therapy. Pediatric speech-language pathologists and oc- propriately in the context of an interdisciplinary team,
cupational therapists generally use noninvasive treat- typically including a registered dietitian, speech-language
ments, such as proper positioning and posture, thickened pathologist, and clinical child and pediatric psychologist.
liquids, modication of bolus size, oral motor and desen- Effective therapy aims to eliminate factors that reinforce
sitization exercises, specialized nipples and bottles, and maladaptive mealtime behavior. (2) Settings include out-
altering the temperature, texture, or presentation of food. patient, partial day, and inpatient facilities. Treatment
The evidence base for these interventions is limited. (7) should start with the least intrusive approach, generally
(10) Transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimula- outpatient. The literature does not support pharmaco-
tion is an emerging therapy for dysphagia in children. logic treatment with appetite stimulants (eg, megestrol
It involves noninvasive, external electrical stimulation acetate and cyproheptadine) for behavioral feeding disor-
of peripheral motor nerves of the anterior throat to acti- ders. Caregiver compliance is strongly associated with
vate the pharyngeal muscles involved in swallowing. skills maintenance and generalization.
Summary
Those who cannot consume sufcient energy and nu-
trients or do so safely by mouth require enteral (ie, tube) On the basis of strong research evidence, feeding
nutrition. Enteral nutrition can be delivered via nasogas- problems and feeding disorders are common,
tric tube, orogastric tube, or gastrostomy tube (g-tube). especially in children who have developmental
disabilities. (1) (3)
For those requiring enteral nutrition for longer than 6 On the basis of strong research evidence, a variety of
weeks, the latter is preferred. Minimally invasive percuta- prenatal, medical, environmental, behavioral, and
neous endoscopic gastrostomy and laparoscopic gastro- parental factors contribute to childhood feeding
stomy have largely supplanted the open laparotomy for disorders. (1) (3)
placement of g-tubes. To preserve oral activity and feed- On the basis of some research evidence plus
consensus, many feeding problems are preventable or
ing habits, along with hunger and satiety cues, oral feeds easily treated.
(when safe) should precede supplemental tube feeds. En- On the basis of strong research evidence, left
teral nutrition is delivered either intermittently or contin- untreated, feeding disorders may result in
uously. The preferred method is intermittent bolus complications, including aspiration pneumonitis,
feedings, which is more physiologic; however, if the pa- failure to thrive, and parent-child conflict.
On the basis of some research evidence plus consensus,
tient does not tolerate bolus feeds then continuous feeds, treatment of feeding disorders improves nutritional
either intragastric or transpyloric (through a gastrojeju- status, growth, feeding safety, and quality of life.
nostomy), is reasonable. Although the decision to initiate
ACKNOWLEDGMENT. The author acknowledges past 3. Eicher PS. Feeding and its disorders. In: Batshaw M, ed.
and present members of the Interdisciplinary Feeding Children With Disabilities. 7th ed. Baltimore, MD: Brookes
Publishing; 2012
Team at San Antonio Military Pediatric Center for their
4. Ong KK, Loos RJ. Rapid infancy weight gain and subsequent
clinical expertise and guidance, without which this article obesity: systematic reviews and hopeful suggestions. Acta Paediatr.
would not be possible. 2006;95(8):904908
(The views expressed are those of the author and do not 5. Baird J, Fisher D, Lucas P, Kleijnen J, Roberts H, Law C. Being
reect the ofcial policy or position of the US Air Force, De- big or growing fast: systematic review of size and growth in infancy
and later obesity. BMJ. 2005;331(7522):929
partment of Defense or the US Government.)
6. Monteiro POA, Victora CG. Rapid growth in infancy and child-
Suggested Reading hood and obesity in later lifea systematic review. Obes Rev. 2005;6
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Swallowing and (2):143154
Feeding Disorders. Available at http://www.asha.org/slp/ 7. Miller CK. Aspiration and swallowing dysfunction in pediatric
clinical/dysphagia/. Accessed October 29, 2013 patients. Infant Child Adolesc Nutr. 2011;3:336343
Ellyn Satter Associates. Available at http://www.EllynSatter.com. 8. Uher R, Rutter M. Classication of feeding and eating disorders:
Accessed October 29, 2013 review of evidence and proposals for ICD-11. World Psychiatry.
2012;11(2):8092
References 9. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical
1. Bryant-Waugh R, Markham L, Kreipe RE, Walsh BT. Feeding and Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Washington, DC:
eating disorders in childhood. Int J Eat Disord. 2010;43(2):98111 American Psychiatric Association; 2013
2. Sharp WG, Jaquess DL, Morton JF, Herzinger CV. Pediatric 10. Morgan AT, Dodrill P, Ward EC. Interventions for oropha-
feeding disorders: a quantitative synthesis of treatment outcomes. ryngeal dysphagia in children with neurological impairment.
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2010;13(4):348365 Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD009456
PIR Quiz
This quiz is available online at http://pedsinreview.org. NOTE: Learners can take Pediatrics in Review quizzes and claim credit online only. No paper
answer form will be printed in the journal.
1. A previously well 7-month-old infant is developing normally. She sits and holds her bottle independently,
reaches for food, and finger feeds herself. What is the most appropriate food choice for this infant?
A. Chewable solids.
B. Finely chopped table foods.
C. Mashed table foods.
D. Pureed meats.
E. Whole fruits.
3. The mother of the 14-month-old boy asks for some healthful behavior-shaping tips. In response you would
have her:
A. Arrange special mealtimes for her son.
B. Encourage him to self-feed.
C. Make the child sit alone at the table until his plate is clean.
D. Offer a cup of diluted juice if he eats some solids.
E. Permit the boy to watch videos during mealtime.
4. Which of the following 14-month-old boys who are growing normally has a feeding disorder rather than just
a feeding problem?
A. Drools constantly and dribbles food from mouth.
B. Feeds slowly but finishes most meals.
C. Pockets foods in mouth he does not like.
D. Refuses solids but loves milk and juice.
E. Spits out lima beans and broccoli.
5. A 14-month-old girl has severe oropharyngeal dysphagia related to hypoxic-ischemic brain injury secondary to
abruptio placentae. She now requires enteral feeding to provide adequate nutrition. Assuming the gut works
normally, the child is exposed to the family mealtime environment, and the child is encouraged to touch food
without regard to intake, optimal management would include:
A. Continuous gastrostomy tube feeding.
B. Continuous gastrojejunostomy tube feeding.
C. Continuous nasogastric tube feeding.
D. Intermittent bolus gastrostomy tube feeding.
E. Intermittent bolus nasogastric tube feeding.
Updated Information & including high resolution figures, can be found at:
Services http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/content/34/12/549
References This article cites 8 articles, 1 of which you can access for free at:
http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/content/34/12/549#BIBL
Subspecialty Collections This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the
following collection(s):
Journal CME
http://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/journal
_cme
Nutrition
http://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/nutritio
n_sub
Breastfeeding
http://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/breastf
eeding_sub
Child Care
http://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/child_c
are_sub
Permissions & Licensing Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or
in its entirety can be found online at:
http://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions
.xhtml
Reprints Information about ordering reprints can be found online:
http://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xht
ml
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
located on the World Wide Web at:
http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/content/34/12/549
An erratum has been published regarding this article. Please see the attached page for:
http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org//content/35/11/496.full.pdf
Pediatrics in Review is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly
publication, it has been published continuously since 1979. Pediatrics in Review is owned,
published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point
Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright 2013 by the American Academy of
Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0191-9601.