a term in law and communication which describes a situation where speech or

conduct is suppressed by fear of penalization at the interests of an individual or group. It may prompt

self-censorship and therefore hamper free speech. Since many attacks rely on libel law, the

term libel chill is also often used.

is the inhibition or discouragement of the legitimate exercise of natural and legal rights by the threat
of legal sanction
communication that describes a situation where a speech or conduct is suppressed by fear of
penalization at the interests of an individual or group

describes a situation in which rights, such as free speech, are threatened by the possible negative results of
exercising these rights. The effect is to silence criticism and freedom of expression, even in cases where
criticism is perfectly valid.

Also called libel chill, a chilling effect is defined as a situation in which people hesitate to
exercise basic legal rights in fear of the possible negative effects and sanctions their decision
would cause. This is commonly used to hush criticism and freedom of expression, silencing the
people with the threat of legal sanction.
REYES , Nicole Q.

IX-I Mere Maria

CHILLING EFFECT

Definition:

Also called libel chill, a chilling effect is defined as a situation in which people hesitate to exercise basic
legal rights in fear of the possible negative effects and sanctions their decision would cause. This is
commonly used to hush criticism and freedom of expression, silencing the people with the threat of legal
sanction.

How to Use in a Debate:

A chilling effect situation can be used in a Debate through the following points:

- Showing how less legitimate information can be obtained while the chilling effect is still in place.

- All false statements are considered unprotected, but allowing the distribution of this
information can deter those who are aware of the truth to speak in fear of their information being
invalid. The truth will thus be chilled because of the regulation of false information.

Example of How it is Used:

Less legitimate information regarding various political issues would be obtained in fear of the people
being punished with their leakage of information. People would not risk a legal sanction just to be able to
practice their right to speak.

Statements are classified as protected or unprotected based on their value or their harmful effect. Certain
intent requirements are useful, however, it should be made sure that the legitimate information should not
be covered up by false, unnecessary statements.