Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1 Given Parameters
Concrete Depth; ℎ𝑎 = 18 𝑖𝑛
Seismic Design Category; 𝑆𝐷𝐶 𝐶
Y
Concrete is assumed to be cracked
Anchor Material : ASTM F1554 Grade 36
𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑎 = 58000 𝑝𝑠𝑖 X
𝑓𝑦𝑡 = 105000 𝑝𝑠𝑖
𝐴𝑠𝑒,𝑁 = 0.142 𝑖𝑛2
𝐴𝑏𝑟𝑔 = 0.291 𝑖𝑛2
𝑓𝑐′ = 4000 𝑝𝑠𝑖
Loading eccentricities
𝑒𝑥 = 1 𝑖𝑛
𝑒𝑦 = −1 𝑖𝑛
Axial Tension; 𝑁𝑢 = 8 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
Axial Shear Force along X axis
𝑉𝑢𝑥 = 0 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
Axial Shear Force along Y axis;
𝑉𝑢𝑦 = −6 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
2 Tension in Anchors
𝑁𝑢 × 1 = 𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 × 1 = 𝑁𝑢
𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢
𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 ( ) ( )
( − ) ( )
3 = 𝑁𝑢 5𝑁𝑢 ( 3 + 12) 8 = 𝑁𝑢 8 = 𝑁𝑢
3 12 = 𝑁𝑢 =
2 6 24 2 3 24 3 24
2 8
1
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢
− = + =
8 24 12 8 24 6
𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 5𝑁𝑢
− = + =
6 24 8 6 24 24
5𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 5𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢
− = + =
24 24 6 24 24 4
𝑁𝑢 8
= = 2 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
4 4
Tensile component of the strength level earthquake forces applied to anchors exceeds 20%
of the total factored anchor tensile force. Hence, we have to design in accordance with
17.2.3.4.3 and corresponding strengths will be determined in accordance with 17.2.3.4.4
…17.2.3.4.2
4 Failure Modes
4.1. Steel strength of anchor in tension (17.4.1)
𝑁𝑠𝑎 = 𝐴𝑠𝑒,𝑁 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑎 …Eq. 17.4.1.2
𝐴𝑠𝑒,𝑁 = 0.142 𝑖𝑛2
𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑎 = 58000 𝑝𝑠𝑖
2
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
Edge distance to the anchors are 4 𝑖𝑛, 4 𝑖𝑛 and 28 𝑖𝑛 from three sides. ...17.4.2.3
1.5 ℎ𝑒𝑓 = 1.5 × 12 = 18 𝑖𝑛
Since only 2 edges are less than 1.5 ℎ𝑒𝑓 , full ℎ𝑒𝑓 will be taken
a) Calculate 𝐴𝑁𝑐𝑜
2
𝐴𝑁𝑐𝑜 = 9ℎ𝑒𝑓 = 9 × 122 = 1296 𝑖𝑛2 …Eq. 17.4.2.1c
Fig. R17.4.2.1
3
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
b) Calculate 𝐴𝑁𝑐
Since, for our case all the anchors are in tension, the eccentricity will remain same
which can also be calculated as below:
𝑁 𝑁 𝑁 5𝑁 𝑁 𝑁
(12𝑢 − 6𝑢 + 8𝑢 − 24𝑢 + 6𝑢 − 4𝑢 )
𝑒𝑥 = × 4 = −1
𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢 5𝑁𝑢 𝑁𝑢
12 + 8 + 6 + 6 + 24 + 4
4
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
𝑐𝑎,𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝜓𝑒𝑑,𝑁 = 0.7 + 0.3 ( ) = 0.77
1.5ℎ𝑒𝑓
f) 𝜓𝑐𝑝,𝑁 : modification factor for post-installed anchors designed for uncracked concrete
without supplementary reinforcement to control splitting. …17.4.2.7
𝜓𝑐𝑝,𝑁 = 1
𝑁𝑏 = 𝑘𝑐 𝜆𝑎 √𝑓𝑐′ ℎ1.5
𝑒𝑓 …Eq. 17.4.2.2a
5
Then, 𝑁𝑏 = 16𝜆𝑎 √𝑓𝑐′ ℎ𝑒𝑓
3
…Eq. 17.4.2.2b
5
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
1020
𝑁𝑐𝑏𝑔 = × 0.897 × 0.77 × 1 × 1 × 63.65 = 34.6 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
1296
The anchor design tensile strength for resisting earthquake forces shall be determined by
0.75𝜙𝑁𝑐𝑏𝑔 …17.2.3.4.4b
8
Strength utilization = 18.165 = 0.44
4.3. Pullout strength if cast-in, post installed expansion and undercut anchors
in tension (17.4.3)
Nominal pullout strength of single cast-in, post installed expansion and post installed
undercut anchor in tension, 𝑁𝑝𝑛 , shall not exceed.
𝑁𝑝𝑛 = 𝜓𝑐,𝑃 𝑁𝑝
Design strength = 0.75𝜙𝑁𝑝𝑛 for a single anchor, or the most highly stressed individual
anchor in a group of anchors. …17.2.3.4.4c
6
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
2
Strength utilization = 4.89 = 0.41
This will be same along both axis as 𝑐𝑎1 = 4 𝑖𝑛, along both the axis.
For multiple headed anchors with deep embedment close to an edge and with anchor
spacing 8𝑖𝑛 (𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔) < 6𝑐𝑎1 = 24 𝑖𝑛. …17.4.4.2
𝑠
𝑁𝑠𝑏𝑔 = (1 + )𝑁
6𝑐𝑎1 𝑠𝑏
where ‘𝑠’ is the distance between the outer anchors along the edge, and 𝑁𝑠𝑏 is obtained
from before without modification for a perpendicular edge distance.
𝑠 = 8 𝑖𝑛, outer edge distance along x-axis and 12 𝑖𝑛, along y-axis
8
𝑁𝑠𝑏𝑔,𝑦 = (1 + ) 21.8 = 29.07 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
6×4
12
𝑁𝑠𝑏𝑔,𝑥 = (1 + ) 21.8 = 32.7 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
6×4
Along x-axis, the right column i.e. anchors 2, 4, and 6 are resisting side-face blowout. Total
𝑁 𝑁 5𝑁 15𝑁
tension shared by this column = 6𝑢 + 4𝑢 + 24𝑢 = 24𝑢
24
So, the nominal side-face blowout strength along x-axis = 32.7 × 15 = 52.3 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
7
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
Along y-axis, the bottom most row, i.e. anchors 1 and 2, resist side-face blowout. Total
𝑁 𝑁 5𝑁
tension shared by this row = 6𝑢 + 4𝑢 = 12𝑢
12
So, the nominal side-face blowout strength along y-axis = 29.07 × = 69.77 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
5
Governing nominal side-face blowout strength for the group 𝑁𝑐𝑏𝑔 = 52.3 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
8
Strength utilization = 27.46 = 0.29
For a group
𝐴
𝑉𝑐𝑏𝑔 = 𝐴 𝑣𝑐 𝜓𝑒𝑐,𝑉 𝜓𝑒𝑑,𝑉 𝜓𝑐,𝑉 𝜓ℎ,𝑉 𝑉𝑏 …17.5.2.1(b)
𝑣𝑐𝑜
8
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
Since 𝑠𝑦 = 6 𝑖𝑛 ≥ 𝑐𝑎1,1 = 4 𝑖𝑛; so we can distribute the shear force on each of the anchors.
Forces acting at the centroid of the plate will be the shear acting in negative ‘Y’ direction and
its corresponding torsion due to the eccentricity in positive ‘X’ direction.
𝑉𝑢 6
= = 1 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
6 6
Due to Torsion of 𝑉𝑢𝑦 × 𝑒𝑥 = 6 × 1 = 6 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠 − 𝑖𝑛
9
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
𝑠
Where, 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃 = 2𝑑𝑥 and from static equilibrium we know
2 × 𝑅 × 2 × 𝑑 + 𝑅𝑦 × 𝑠𝑥 = 𝑉𝑢 …Eq-1
𝑅 × 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃 = 𝑅𝑦 …Eq-2
From all the above equations it can be derived that
𝑠𝑥 𝑉𝑢
𝑅𝑦 = 𝑉𝑢 × 2 2
= = 0.1 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
8𝑑 + 𝑠𝑥 60
Horizontal component of R will generate forces in horizontal direction over the anchors 1, 2,
5 and 6.
𝑠𝑦
𝑅𝑥 = 𝑅𝑦 × 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝜃 = 𝑅𝑦 × 2 × = 0.15 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
𝑠𝑥
So, neglecting ‘X’ direction forces, and adding up forces in ‘Y’ direction for both the effects,
10
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
2
a) 𝐴𝑣𝑐0 = 4.5𝑐𝑎1,1 = 4.5 × 42 = 72 𝑖𝑛2
11
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
b) 𝐴𝑣𝑐
ℎ𝑎 = 18 𝑖𝑛 > 1.5 𝑐𝑎1,1 = 6 𝑖𝑛 …OK
𝐴𝑣𝑐 = 1.5𝑐𝑎1,1 × (1.5𝑐𝑎1,1 + 𝑠𝑥 + 𝑐𝑎1,2 ) = 6 × (6 + 8 + 4) = 6 × 18 = 108 𝑖𝑛2
𝑙𝑒 0.2
𝑉𝑏 = min {7 ( ) √𝑑𝑎 𝜆𝑎 √𝑓𝑐′ (𝑐𝑎1 )1.5 , 9𝜆𝑎 √𝑓𝑐′ (𝑐𝑎1 )1.5 }
𝑑𝑎
…Eq.17.5.2.2.a & b
where, 𝑙𝑒 = min(ℎ𝑒𝑓 , 8𝑑𝑎 ) = 4 𝑖𝑛 and 𝜆𝑎 = 1
𝑉𝑏 = 3.8 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
1
𝜓𝑒𝑐,𝑉 = ( )≤1
2𝑒𝑉′
1 + 3𝑐
𝑎1
Taking the revised eccentricity based on the distribution of shear and torsion in ‘Y’
direction.
𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑣,𝑥 = 0.4 𝑖𝑛
𝜓𝑒𝑐,𝑉 = 0.9375
e) 𝜓𝑒𝑑,𝑉 : modification factor for edge effect for a single anchor or a group of anchors
loaded in shear. …17.5.2.6
𝑐𝑎2
𝜓𝑒𝑑,𝑉 = 0.7 + 0.3 ( ) = 0.9
1.5𝑐𝑎1
12
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
a) 𝐴𝑣𝑐0 = 72 𝑖𝑛2
e) 𝜓𝑐,𝑉 = 1
f) 𝜓ℎ,𝑉 = 1
g) 𝑉𝑏 =
𝑙 0.2
min {7 ( 𝑒 )
𝑑𝑎
√𝑑𝑎 𝜆𝑎 √𝑓𝑐′ (𝑐𝑎1 )1.5 , 9𝜆𝑎 √𝑓𝑐′ (𝑐𝑎1 )1.5 } =
3.8 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
132
𝑉𝑐𝑏𝑔 = 72
× 1 × 1 × 1 × 3.8 = 6.96 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
𝑉𝑢𝑎𝑦 3.3
Strength utilization = = = 0.32
𝜙𝑉𝑐𝑏𝑔 10.44
13
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
Since, 𝑠𝑦 < 𝑐𝑎2,1 (6 < 10) ; So it would not be conservative to consider breakout against the load
distributed to all the active anchors. So, we shall check for concrete breakout by applying the entire load
on the second row of anchors (CASE 3) …Fig. R17.5.2.1b
14
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
Distribution of forces due to shear acting along ‘Y’ direction and torsion
1
c) 𝜓𝑒𝑐,𝑉 = ( 2𝑒′𝑉
) ≤ 1 = 0.94
1+
3𝑐𝑎1
𝑎2 𝑐
d) 𝜓𝑒𝑑,𝑉 = 0.7 + 0.3 (1.5𝑐 ) = 0.78
𝑎1
f) 𝜓ℎ,𝑉 = 1
𝑙 0.2
g) 𝑉𝑏 = min {7 (𝑑𝑒 ) √𝑑𝑎 𝜆𝑎 √𝑓𝑐′ (𝑐𝑎1 )1.5 , 9𝜆𝑎 √𝑓𝑐′ (𝑐𝑎1 )1.5 } = 15.05 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
𝑎
405
𝑉𝑐𝑏𝑔 = × 0.94 × 0.78 × 1 × 1 × 15.05 = 9.93 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
450
15
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
a) 𝐴𝑣𝑐0 = 72 𝑖𝑛2
b) 𝐴𝑣𝑐 = (3 × 4) × 6 = 72 𝑖𝑛2
e) 𝜓𝑐,𝑉 = 1
f) 𝜓ℎ,𝑉 = 1
g) 𝑉𝑏 =
𝑙 0.2
min {7 ( 𝑒 )
𝑑𝑎
√𝑑𝑎 𝜆𝑎 √𝑓𝑐′ (𝑐𝑎1 )1.5 , 9𝜆𝑎 √𝑓𝑐′ (𝑐𝑎1 )1.5 } =
3.8 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
𝑐𝑎1 = 4 𝑖𝑛
72
𝑉𝑐𝑏𝑔 = × 1 × 1 × 1 × 3.8 = 3.8 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
72
16
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑎 = 58000
58000
𝑉𝑠𝑎 = 0.6 × 0.142 × = 4.94 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
1000
Due to Torsion
17
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
6 6
2𝑅 × 2𝑑 = 6 ; 𝑅 = ;𝑅 = =0.3
4𝑑 4×√32 +42
4
𝑅𝑦 = 𝑅 × 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃 = 𝑅 × = 0.24
𝑑
3
𝑅𝑥 = 𝑅 × 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜃 = 𝑅 × = 0.18
𝑑
6
Due to shear all the anchors will carry a force of 4 = 1.5 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
2×0.24×8
Revised eccentricity = = 0.64
6
Design strength of the most stressed anchor = 𝜙𝑉𝑠𝑎 = 0.65 × 4.94 = 3.21 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
…17.3.3(a)
18
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
From 6.1 we know that the revised eccentricity for shear along ‘Y’ due to combined action of
shear and torsion is = 0.4 𝑖𝑛. So,
1
𝜓𝑒𝑐𝑦,𝑁 = = 0.98
2 × 0.4
1 + 3 × 12
1020
𝑁𝑐𝑏𝑔 = × 0.98 × 0.77 × 1 × 1 × 63.65 = 37.8 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
1296
19
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
a) For a group of anchors; the ratio of tensile load on the most highly stressed anchor to
the steel strength of that anchor shall be equal to or greater than the ratio of tensile
load on tension loaded anchors to the concrete governed strength of those anchors.
Concrete governed strength will be the nominal strength considering pullout, side-
face blowout and concrete breakout. …17.2.3.4.3a (ii)
(i) Pullout: For consideration of pullout in groups, the ratio shall be calculated
for the most highly stressed anchor.
𝑁𝑝𝑛 = 9.312
Tensile load on most highly stressed anchor (Anchor No. 2) = 2 𝑘𝑖𝑝𝑠
2
Utilization ratio for pullout = 9.312 = 0.215
Hence, our mode of failure is brittle. So we need to check other options b,c, and d
20
ANCHOR DESIGN | ACI 318-14 UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO
6 Summary
𝑁𝑢𝑎 𝑉𝑢𝑎
+ ≤ 1.2
𝜙𝑁𝑛 𝜙𝑉𝑛
All the results have been verified using Quick Anchor, software by S K Ghosh Associates, which provides
detailed calculations at each and every step. The numbers got are within the same range as that from
the software. For more information on the software follow
(https://www.secure.skghoshassociates.com/product/show_group.php?group=520080616)
(https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6366680453881044992)
21