100%(1)100% au considerat acest document util (1 vot)
588 vizualizări1 pagină
Petitioners Lambo and Belocura were employed as tailors paid by piecework and filed a case against their employer for unpaid benefits including holiday pay upon termination. The labor arbiter found for the petitioners but the NLRC reversed stating the petitioners abandoned their work. The Supreme Court ruled that as the petitioners were illegally dismissed, they are entitled to back wages and separation pay. The court also found the petitioners should receive overtime pay, holiday pay, and 13th month pay as regular employees paid on a piece-rate basis.
Petitioners Lambo and Belocura were employed as tailors paid by piecework and filed a case against their employer for unpaid benefits including holiday pay upon termination. The labor arbiter found for the petitioners but the NLRC reversed stating the petitioners abandoned their work. The Supreme Court ruled that as the petitioners were illegally dismissed, they are entitled to back wages and separation pay. The court also found the petitioners should receive overtime pay, holiday pay, and 13th month pay as regular employees paid on a piece-rate basis.
Petitioners Lambo and Belocura were employed as tailors paid by piecework and filed a case against their employer for unpaid benefits including holiday pay upon termination. The labor arbiter found for the petitioners but the NLRC reversed stating the petitioners abandoned their work. The Supreme Court ruled that as the petitioners were illegally dismissed, they are entitled to back wages and separation pay. The court also found the petitioners should receive overtime pay, holiday pay, and 13th month pay as regular employees paid on a piece-rate basis.
AVELINO LAMBO and VICENTE BELOCURA vs. NLRC and J.C.
TAILOR SHOP and/or JOHNNY CO
Topic: Holiday Pay: Workers paid by results
Nature: SPECIAL CIVIL ACTION in the Supreme Court. Ponente: MENDOZA, J. Facts: Petitioners Lambo and Belocura were employed as tailors by private respondent JC Tailor Shop. They worked from 8am-7pm daily, including Sundays and Holidays and were paid on a piece-work basis. When they were terminated, they filed a case for illegal dismissal, payment of overtime pay, holiday pay, premium pay on holidays and rest days, service incentive pay, separation pay, 13th month pay, and attorneys fees. LA found respondents guilty. LA awarded backwages, overtime pay, holiday pay, 13th month pay, separation pay and attorneys fees, corresponding to 10% of the total monetary awards, in favor of petitioners. NLRC reversed the LAs decision after finding that petitioners had not been dismissed from employment but merely threatened with a closure of business if they insisted on their demand for a straight payment of their minimum wage. NLRC held petitioners guilty of abandonment of work. Petitioners allege that they were dismissed by private respondents as they were about to file a petition with DOLE for payment of benefits. They denied that they abandoned their work. Issue: Whether the employees should receive the holiday pay they are asking for Held: YES. Ratio: As petitioners were illegally dismissed, they are entitled to reinstatement with backwages. Considering that petitioners were dismissed from the service on January 17, 1989, i.e., prior to March 21, 1989, the Labor Arbiter correctly applied the rule in the Mercury Drug case, according to which the recovery of backwages should be limited to three years without qualifications or deductions. Any award in excess of three years is null and void as to the excess. The Labor Arbiter correctly ordered private respondents to give separation pay. Considerable time has lapsed since petitioners dismissal, so that reinstatement would now be impractical and hardly in the best interest of the parties. In lieu of reinstatement, separation pay should be awarded to petitioners at the rate of one month salary for every year of service, with a fraction of at least six (6) months of service being considered as one (1) year. The awards for overtime pay, holiday pay and 13th month pay are in accordance with our finding that petitioners are regular employees, although paid on a piece-rate basis.