Sunteți pe pagina 1din 22

The British Journal of Psychiatry (2017)

211, 151-156. doi:


10.1192/bjp.bp.116.194019

Childhood trauma has been associated strength of this association was


with first-episode psychosis,1'2 affective found to be dose-dependent, with
dysfunction,3-6 and substance use.2-9 In higher rates of psychosis
a recent case-control study patients occurring as the frequency and

Influence of childhood trauma on diagnosis


with first-episode psychosis severity of traumatic experiences
showed a prevalence of physical increased.9 We therefore aimed to

and substance use in first-episode psychosis


abuse of 14-15% and a prevalence verify, in a large,
of sexual abuse of 18%.' In a epidemiologically representative
similar sample two-fold higher sample of people with first-episode
rates of S. Tomassi,trauma
childhood S. Tosato,
were V.psychosis,
Mondelli, whether
C. Faravelli,
people A. who
Lasalvia, G. Fioravanti, C. Bonetto, A. Fioritti,
reported C. in Cremonese,
cases compared R. LowithParrino, K. De Santi,
had experienced A. Meneghelli,
childhood trauma S. Torresani, G. De Girolamo, E. Semrov,
controls.2M.Exposure
Pratelli,toD.childhood
Cristofalo,(when M. Ruggeri
compared andwiththe those
GET UP whoGroup
trauma was found to be had not) showed a psychosis onset
associated with a two-fold risk of characterised by a higher rate of
Background
both recurrent and persistent affective psychosis, and second,
depression;Childhood
3 trauma has
it predicts been significantly
lifetime had an associated
increasedwith first- rate higher
lifetime of rates of lifetime use of cannabis (68% v. 41%; P =0.02)
episode psychosis, affective dysfunction and substance use. and heroin (20% v. 5%; P=0.02). Severe physical abuse was
suicide attempts in patients with substance use.
associated with increased lifetime use of heroin (15% v. 5%;
Aims
treatment-resistant depression P= 0.03) and cocaine (32% v. 17%; P =0.05).
(OR= 2.79, To test95% whether people with first-episode psychosis who had
CI 1.14-6.84), 4

and hasexperienced
been related childhood
to trauma,
the when compared with those
Method Conclusions
who had not, showed
presence of psychotic features in a higher rate of affective psychosis
Patients with first-episode psychosis exposed to childhood
and an5increased lifetime rate of substance use.
mood disorders. Finally, childhood This study was conducted within trauma appear to constitute a distinctive subgroup in terms
trauma has Method been associated with the framework of the Genetics of diagnosis and lifetime substance use.
a higherThe risksample compriseduse
of substance Endophenotypes
345inparticipants and Treatment:
with first-episode
adolescencepsychosis (58%
and early male, mean
adulthood in age early PsychosisDeclaration
29.8 years, s.d.=9.7).
Understanding - of interest
the general population (OR= 3.83, Psychosis early Intervention None.
and
Results
95% CI Severe 1.29-11.30), 2
and was
sexual abuse may Assessment
significantly associated of withNeeds
a and
Copyright and usage
also havediagnosis
a role inof and Outcome
affective psychosis
modulating (x2=4.9, P(GET
=0.04) UPandPIANO)
with trial. The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2017.
moderating the association This is a large, multicentre,
between cannabis use and the randomised controlled trial
later development of psychosis.' comparing an add-on multi-
The risk of psychosis is higher in element psychosocial early
those who have been exposed to intervention with routine care for
both childhood trauma and people affected by first-episode
cannabis use compared with those psychosis and their relatives,
exposed to only one of the two. The provided within Italian public

15
mental health services. Detailed cases at first contact during the
information on the study design, index period (1 April 2010 to 31
sample recruitment and clinical March 2011) to the study team.
assessment has been reported Immediately thereafter, a
elsewhere.'9 The trial was screening questionnaire for
proposed to all community mental psychosis was administered.12 The
health centres (CMHCs) located inclusion criteria were:
across two northern Italian regions
age 18-54 years;
(Veneto and Emilia-Romagna) and
the urban areas of Florence, Milan residence within the
and Bolzano, covering an area with catchment areas of CMHCs;
9 951 306 inhabitants." Of 126 presence of at least one of
CMHCs, 117 (93%, covering 9 the following symptoms:
304 093 inhabitants) participated. hallucinations, delusions,
The trial was approved by the qualitative speech disorder,
ethics committees of the qualitative psychomotor
coordinating centre (Azienda disorder or bizarre or grossly
Ospedaliera Universitaria inappropriate behaviour; or
Integrata di Verona) and each two of the following symptoms:
participating unit, and was loss of interest, initiative and
registered with ClinicalTrials.gov drive; social withdrawal; episodic
(NCT01436331). severe excitement; purposeless
destructiveness; overwhelming
Participants fear or marked self-neglect
All CMHC professionals were first lifetime contact with
asked to refer potential psychosis CMHCs, prompted by these
symptoms.
Tomassi et al

Exclusion criteria were the first 17 years of life; loss was


antipsychotic medication ( >3 defined as the death of one or both
months) prescribed for an identical parents during the participant's
or similar mental disorder; mental childhood. Participants were defined
disorders due to a general medical as 'traumatised' if they had
condition; moderate to severe experienced at least one trauma:
mental retardation assessed by severe sexual abuse, severe physical
clinical functional assessment; abuse, separation, and/or loss.
and psychiatric diagnosis other Lifetime substance use, including
than ICD-10 for psychosis. Since a several types of drugs, was
first psychotic episode is generally a assessed using the Cannabis
phase of high diagnostic instability, Experiences Questionnaire." The
the specific ICD-10 codes for sample was stratified into two
psychosis (Flx.4; Flx.5; Flx.7; F20- groups: those who had never used
29; F30.2, F31.2, F31.5, F31.6, substances and those who had
F32.3, F33.3) were assigned at 9 used substances at least once in
months. The best-estimate ICD-10 their life.
diagnoses were made by consensus
by a panel of clinicians by taking
Statistical analysis
into account all available The association between
information gathered in the 9- categorical variables was evaluated
month follow-up period, as required by chi-squared or Fisher's exact
to apply the Item Group Checklist test, where appropriate. Adjustment
of the Schedule for Clinical for gender was performed in
Assessment in Neuropsychiatry univariate logistic regression models,
(SCAN) 13
Eligible patients, with specific types of traumas as
identified as those who were dependent variables and diagnosis
sufficiently clinically stable, gave and substance misuse as
written informed consent!' independent variables. Interaction
between gender and trauma was
Assessment controlled for in all models. All
Participants were assessed by a team tests were bilateral at P <0.05.
of 17 independent researchers who Analyses were performed using
underwent specific training on the SPSS version 22.0 for Windows.
use of the standardised instruments
and an interrater reliability exercise R
to determine consistency of
esults
evaluations between investigators.
Information about childhood Descri
trauma and substance use was ption
collected using the Childhood
of the
Experience of Care and Abuse
Questionnaire (CECA-Q) and the sampl
Cannabis Experiences e
Questionnaire respectively.14"5
Within the GET UP PIANO trial,
Severe sexual abuse has been
444 patients identified at intake
defined as an experience that:
with a confirmed ICD-10 diagnosis
had to meet at least two of the following
criteria: the perpetrator was known to the
of psychosis at 9 months were
individual; the perpetrator was a relative; the assessed. Of these, 345 (78%)
perpetrator lived in the same household; the individuals (58% male, mean
unwanted sexual experience occurred more
than once; the perpetrator touched the child's
genitals; the perpetrator forced the child to
touch the perpetrator's genitals; the abuse age 29.8 years, s.d. = 9.7) agreed to
involved sexual intercourse.16 be interviewed about their
childhood traumatic experiences
Severe physical abuse has been and represented the sample of this
defined as a repeated exposure to study. No significant difference was
physical violence from parental found with regard to
figures before age 16: sociodemographic or clinical
that had to meet at least two of the following characteristics between participants
criteria: the abuse consisted of being hit with who completed the CECA-Q and
a belt or stick or being punched or kicked; the
abuse resulted in an injury, including broken those who did not (data available
limbs, black eyes or bruising; the from the authors), with the
perpetrator was considered to be out of exception of non-Italian nationality,
control.16
which was more frequent among
Separation has been defined as a those who did not complete the
detachment from at least one living questionnaire (P= 0.01). Among
relative longer than 6 months within the 345 persons who completed

152
the CECA-Q, 80 (23%) received Sociodemographic features and
an ICD-10 code for affective clinical characteristics of the sample
psychoses, whereas 265 (77%) are shown in Table 1.
received an ICD-10 code for non-
affective psychoses (schizophrenia
Childhood trauma and
n=96, 28%; non-affective, non-
schizophrenic psychosis n= 169,
diagnosis
49%). Regarding childhood trauma, The overall rate of affective psychosis
of the 345 people with first-episode detected in traumatised and non-
psychosis 8% experienced severe traumatised participants was
sexual abuse during their around 24% in both groups (Fig.
childhood, 14% reported severe 1). Analysing the specific types of
physical abuse and 20% were traumas, we found a significant
separated for more than 6 months association between severe
from at least one of the parental childhood sexual abuse and
figures and/or lost one of their
affective psychosis (x2 = 4.9, P=
parents. Overall, 37% had had at
0.04). In particular, 42% of those
least one traumatic experience
who reported severe sexual abuse had
during their childhood. In terms of
an affective psychosis compared
lifetime substance use, 43% of the
with 22% of the non-sexually
345 participants reported cannabis
abused group; this finding
use, 20% recalled cocaine use and
remained significant after
6% reported heroin use. When
adjusting for gender (OR = 2.2,
looking at combined lifetime use
we found, as expected, that all 95% CI 1.1-6.2; P= 0.03). The
participants (100%) who reported interaction between gender and
a lifetime use of heroin had both trauma was not significant. In
cocaine and cannabis lifetime contrast, the percentage of affective
use. Similarly, those who reported psychosis was lower in
a lifetime use of cocaine also had a participants with severe physical
lifetime cannabis use in 96% of abuse than in those without it
cases Finally, among those with a (16% v. 24%; P= 0.25),
cannabis lifetime use, 52% reported
an exclusive use of cannabis.
Table 1 Sociodemographic profile of the sample (n=345)
Sociodemographic factor n (%)
Gender, male: n (%) 199 (57.7)
Age at first contact with services, years: mean (s.d.) 29.8 (9.7)
Educational level, n (%)8
Low (primary-middle school) 125 (37.2)
High (secondary school, university) 211 (62.8)
Marital status, n (%)b
Single 251 (75.4)
In a relationship/married 62 (18.6)
Widowed/separated/divorced 20 (6.0)
Working status, n (%)8
Unemployed 107 (31.8)
Employed 126 (37.5)
Student/homemaker/retired 103 (30.7)
Nationality, n (%)b
Italian 311 (91.2)
Other 30 (8.8)

a. Data missing for 9 participants.


b. Data missing for 12 participants.
c. Data missing for 4 participants.
Pa
rti
ci
pa
nt
s
wi
th
af
fe
cti
ve
ps
yc
h
os
is,
%

Pa
rti
ci
pa
nt
s
wi
th
lif
eti
m
e
ca
n
na
bi
s
us
e,
%
Tomassi et al

between loss/separation and lifetime heroin use (8%


in exposed v. results confirm at least a two-fold
increase and are consistent with 6% in non-exposed
groups; P= 0.71). findings shown previously.2

Cocaine been widely described


No significant difference in before. Methodological
lifetime cocaine use (23% issues such as
v. 16%; P=0.30) was found heterogeneity of
between traumatised and definition, sample size and
non-traumatised demographic and social
participants. In particular, context issues have been
no significant association identified as possible
was found between severe reasons for this
sexual abuse or variability." The use of a
loss/separation and 'severe' abuse category,
lifetime use of cocaine. instead of the 'abuse' one,
Conversely, severely might account for
physically abused differences with other
participants showed studies. Rates of sexual
higher lifetime cocaine use and physical abuse in our
in comparison with non- sample were 11% and 29%
physically abused patients respectively. Regarding
(32% v. 17%; P=0.05). This sexual abuse, our rate
finding gained significance remains substantially
after adjusting for gender lower than that found by
(OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.9; others;'" however, the
P = 0.04). The interaction prevalence of physical
between gender and abuse is broadly in line
trauma was not with other research. The
significant. surge in the rate of
physical abuse in our
sample might depend on
Discussion the inclusion in this
category of physical
This is the first study to punishments (i.e. open-
investigate the handed smacks) and
relationship between maltreatments (such as
childhood trauma and punches and kicks), even
affective psychosis in a when occurring once in a
large sample with first- lifetime. The social
episode psychosis acceptability of corporal
recruited in a 'real world' punishments as a method
setting. As predicted, we of education and their
found a significant consequent high frequency
association between within Italian families might
affective psychosis and therefore explain the data.
severe sexual abuse and Overall, the lower
between drug misuse and percentage of abused
both severe sexual and participants in our sample
severe physical abuse. We is consistent with a survey
found the frequency of carried out in the Italian
sexual and physical abuse general population, in
to be substantially lower which 8 children out of
than in previous studies 1000 were reported to be
of first-episode victims of maltreatments;
psychosis." In fact, severe specifically, among minors
sexual abuse was reported under the care of child
in 8% of our sample v. 15- services, 4% were sexually
18% in previous studies; abused whereas 7%
similarly, severe physical experienced physical
abuse was reported in maltreatment.19 When
14% v. 15-22%."7 compared with rates from
Variability in the the World Health
prevalence of abuse has Organization (WHO)
Global Status Violence results. A recent study
Prevention, a discrepancy described a significant
comes to light with Italian association between sexual
rates, which are abuse and depressive
substantially lower than symptoms in women but
rates in other high-income not in men, suggesting
countries.20 In the USA the that maltreatments may
prevalence rates of sexual have a gender effect on
abuse and physical the development of
maltreatment were 7% and maladaptive self-images
10% respectively; in and depression,'
Canada the respective mediated by a gender
rates were 7% and 23%, difference in stress
and in Australia 10% and reactivity. Women have
28%. These differences been shown to be more
might be due to a more susceptible to the
cohesive family and an negative consequences of
enhanced social support stress in general," and of
network, which are early traumatic
common in southern experiences in particular."
European countries," or it In contrast, we did not find
could reflect the proneness any effect of gender on the
to silence, connected with association between severe
the feelings of shame and sexual abuse and affective
stigma, related to the psychosis. Our study did
experience of trauma." not investigate the
Nonetheless, comparing presence of depressive
trauma rates in our symptoms but focused on
sample (sexual abuse 11%, diagnostic category; issues
physical abuse 29%) with other than gender might
those of the Italian general therefore be involved and
population (sexual abuse explain the discrepancy
4%, physical abuse 7%), with previous evidence.
the
Affective psychosis and Substance use and childhood
childhood trauma trauma
In our study severely In our sample, drug use
sexually abused people was found to be associated
with first-episode psychosis with both severe sexual
had a five-fold higher and severe physical abuse.
likelihood of receiving a Traumatised participants
diagnosis of affective in particular, those
psychosis. Our results are reporting severe childhood
in line with previous sexual abuse showed
studies, which showed an significantly higher lifetime
increased presence of cannabis use. The trauma-
psychotic features in both cannabispsychosis
major depressive disorder association could involve
and bipolar affective several psychosocial
disorder when the person elements, contributing to an
had been abused.5'6'23 enhanced vulnerability,8 and
Affective symptoms could various biological factors,
mediate the victimisation including the dopamine
psychosis association. Our neurotransmitter system,3
data are consistent with and the hypothalamic
previous studies,24'25 which pituitaryadrenal (HPA)
advocate a significant role axis.2 First, childhood
of negative beliefs about trauma has been
self and others and of significantly associated
depression and anxiety with depression, which
within the pathway from usually precedes the
early trauma to psychosis. onset of substance
Most interestingly, only dependence among
sexual abuse not physical traumatised people.31
abuse has been proved to Consistent with this,
be a strong and specific risk abused individuals in our
factor for mental disorders, sample more frequently
including major depression received a diagnosis of
and anxiety disorder," once affective psychosis when
more supporting our compared with those who

154
were not abused. We may adversities, such as a low
therefore propose the role socioeconomic status and
of affective symptoms as unemployment, have been
mediators or modulators of shown to be significantly
the traumacannabis- associated with both
psychosis association. psychosis and childhood
Abused people tend to trauma.32 Finally, it is a
become more frequently reasonable hypothesis that
depressed and thus might abused and non-abused
more frequently use individuals have similar
cannabis to alleviate drug use patterns but that
depressive symptoms, or only the former develop
could develop dysfunctional psychosis owing to their pre-
coping strategies such as existing enhanced
self-medication to reduce vulnerability.8'33
trauma-related stress.8 Biological factors may
Second, social factors might also be involved. First, and
have a meaningful in line with the
influence: disadvantaged 'sensitisation' hypothesis,
environments, where it is genetically predisposed
easier to become individuals, whether
entrapped in substance exposed to environmental
dependence, and social risk factors (as childhood
Childhood trauma and substance use in first-episode psychosis

trauma and cannabis use) or not, performed adjustments excluding the


have been proved to show an gender effect, known to represent a
increased dopaminergic response potential confounder on the
to social stressors. It may lead to association between trauma and
stable changes in the stress-related psychosis.'
dopaminergic response system,34 However, some limitations
and eventually to a subsequent should also be considered. Reliance
enhanced vulnerability for on the retrospective reporting of
psychosis. Second, animal studies abuse might increase the risk of
have shown an influence of recall bias. However, the
environmental stressors on a rat's reliability of patients affected by
delta-tetrahydrocannabinol (ATHC) psychosis in referring trauma has
response:35 under stressful been clearly demonstrated;" their
housing conditions (i.e. isolation reports were independent of
and food deprivation) ATHC symptoms, stable over time and
administration resulted in an generally consistent with other
increased dopamine uptake and sources of information. It has also
significant behavioural been proved that retrospective recall
abnormalities not observed in control yields an underestimation of the
group rats.36 Finally, early traumatic phenomenon, rather than an
experiences have been associated overestimation." Despite clear
with permanent HPA axis evidence of association between
overreactivity (higher levels of trauma, cannabis and psychosis,
cortisol) to stressors and changes our data do not elucidate whether
in brain structures.37 Moreover, we childhood traumatic experiences
found that both sexual and physical and drug misuse represent
severe abuse experiences were vulnerability factors for psychosis or
significantly associated with heroin environmental stressors that trigger
lifetime use, whereas cocaine lifetime the disorder acting on a pre-
use appeared to be associated only existing vulnerability. Traumatic
with severe physical abuse, which experiences and drug misuse could
is to some degree in line with both be vulnerability agents,
results for other psychiatric decreasing the individual's resilience
disorders (anxiety, mood and in response to other stressors such
borderline personality disorders)." as migration, and leading to
Our findings seem to contrast psychosis. They might represent two
with a recent study that found no different environmental stressors,
association between childhood acting in an additive or
trauma and use of cannabis or multiplicative way on another
other illicit drugs.39 This type of vulnerability (possibly
inconsistency might be partially genetic). Childhood trauma could
explained by the different time enhance vulnerability and
frame used when investigating cannabis use acts as an
substance use: we explored lifetime exacerbating agent or vice versa.
use, whereas the other study Finally, because of the relative rarity
investigated substance use in the of abusive experiences, resulting in
preceding month. small numbers, no further
adjustments for social factors
Strengths and limitations (such as employment or
The GET UP PIANO trial is the first socioeconomic status) and/or
trial in first-episode psychosis genetic vulnerability (familiality)
patients performed in a large have been carried out in the
catchment area, corresponding to analysis.
nearly 10 million inhabitants.
Over 90% of CMHCs completed Future research
the study, demonstrating that the In addition to clarifying whether
participants were highly cannabis and childhood trauma
representative of the patients treated represent vulnerability factors or
in the community psychiatric stressors triggering psychosis,
services. We used reliable, studies should also analyse this
internationally validated association, taking into account
instruments and adopted other environmental variables
conservative cut-off points, and/or biological markers. A
previously applied, to identify only population-based, longitudinal
the most severe forms of abuse. prospective study design, with
Moreover, we systematically long-term follow-up (from

155
infancy to adulthood) would be Funding
most appropriate." Overall, our
study suggests that patients with The study was funded by the Ministry of Health, Italy
Ricerca Sanitaria Finalizzata, Code
first-episode psychosis exposed to H61.108000200001.
childhood trauma constitute a
distinctive subgroup characterised
Acknowledgements
by diverse features in terms of
nosology and drug use. It has We thank all members of the Genetics
elucidated, albeit partially, to what Endophenotypes and Treatment: Understanding
early Psychosis (GET UP) group; see online
extent the presence of childhood supplement DS1 for full details of the group.
trauma affects features of first-
episode psychosis Finally, this
References
study may provide some
important hints for specific 1 Fisher HL, Jones PB, Fearon P, Craig TK,
therapeutic and/or preventive Dazzan P, Morgan K, et al. The varying
interventions, which might carry impact of type, timing and frequency of
exposure to childhood adversity on its
within themselves an enhanced association with adult psychotic disorder.
impact on illness course, outcomes Psycho) Med 2010; 40:1967-78.
and prognosis. 2 Mondelli V, Dazzan P, Hepgul N, Di Forti
M, Aas M, D'Albenzio A, et al.
Abnormal cortisol levels during the day
Simona Tomassi, MD, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement
Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona;
and cortisol awakening response in first-
Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement episode psychosis:
Sciences, the
University ofrole of stress and
of antipsychotic
Verona, and Unit of Psychiatry, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integratatreatment.
Verona Schizophr
(AOUI), Verona; Valeria Mondelli, MD PhD, Department Res 2010; 116: 234-42.
of Psychological Medicine,
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London,
3 Nanni V, Uher R, Danese A. Childhood
UK; Carlo Faravelli, MD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Firenze, Florence;
Antonio Lasalvia, MD PhD, Unit of Psychiatry, AOUI, maltreatment
Verona; predicts unfavorable
course of illness and treatment
PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Firenze, Florence;
outcomeSciences,
PhD, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement in depression: a meta-
University of Verona; Angelo Fioritti, MD, Department analysis.
of MentalAm J Psychiatry 2011; 169:
Health,
Azienda Unita Sanitario Locale (Alla) Bologna, Bologna; 141-51.
of Psychiatry, Azienda Ospedaliera Padova, Padua;
Department of Mental Health, Florence; Katia De4Santi, Tunnard C, Rane U, Wooderson SC,
AOUI, Verona; Anna Meneghelli, Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Markopoulou
Granda Milano,K, Poon
MHDL, Fekadu A, et al.
Programma 2000, Milan; Stefano Tonesani, MD, Department The impact of childhood
of Mental Health, adversity on
Bolzano; Giovanni De Girolamo, MD, St John of Godsuicidality and clinical
Clinical Research Centrecourse in
of Brescia, Brescia; Enrico Semrov, MD, Department of treatment-resistant
Mental Health, Reggio depression. J Affect
Disord
Emilia; Michela Pratelli, MD, Department of Mental Health, 2014; 152-4: 122-30.
Riccione;
Cristofalo, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences,
University of Verona; 5 Gaudiano BA, Zimmerman M. The
Mirella Ruggeri, MD PhD, Department of Neurosciences, relationship
Biomedicine between
and childhood trauma
history and
Movement Sciences, University of Verona, and Unit of Psychiatry, AOUI,theVerona,
psychotic subtype of major
Italy; the GET UP Group depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand
2010;
Correspondence: Professor Sarah Tosato, Department of 121: 462-70.
Neurosciences,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of6 Psychiatry,
Upthegrove University
R, ChardofC, Jones L,
Verona, P. le Scuro, 10 37134 Verona, Italy. Email: sarah.tosato@univr.it
Gordon-Smith K, Forty L, Jones I, et
al. Adverse childhood events and
psychosis in bipolar affective disorder. Br
.1 Psychiatry 2015; 206: 191-7.
Tomassi et al

7 Madruga CS, Laranjeira R, Caetano R, exposure and posttraumatic stress


Ribeiro W, Zaleski M, Pinsky I, et al. disorder in psychosis: findings from a first-
Early life exposure to violence and admission cohort. J Consult Clin
substance misuse in adulthood - the first Psycho! 2002; 70: 246-51.
Brazilian national survey. Addict Behav
18 Fisher HL, Craig T. Childhood
2011; 36: 251-5.
adversity and psychosis. In
8 Houston JE, Murphy J, Shevlin M, Society and Psychosis (ed C
Adamso G. Cannabis use and Morgan, K McKenzie, P Fearon): 95-
psychosis: re-visiting the role of 111. Cambridge University Press,
childhood trauma. Psycho! Med 2008.
2011; 41: 2339-48.
19 Bollini A, Giannotta F, Angeli A.
9 Konings M, Stefanis N, Kuepper R, de Maltrattamento sui bambini:
Graaf R, ten Have M, van Os J, et al. quante le vittime in Italia? Prima
Replication in two independent Indagine nazionale quali-
population-based samples that childhood quantitativa sul maltrattamento a
maltreatment and cannabis use danno di bambini. Terre des
synergistically impact on psychosis risk. Hommes/CISMAI, 2013
Psycho! Med 2011; 42: 149-59. (http://www.garanteinfanzia.org/site
10 Ruggeri M, Bonetto C, Lasalvia A, De s/default/files/documenti/dossier-
Girolamo G, Fioritti A, Rucci P, et al. A bambini-maltrattati-tdh-cismai.pdf).
multi-element psychosocial 20 World Health Organization. Global
intervention for early psychosis (GET Status Report on Violence
UP PIANO TRIAL) conducted in a Prevention. WHO, 2014.
catchment area of 10 million
21 Bertani M, Lasalvia A, Bonetto C,
inhabitants: study protocol for a
Tosato S, Cristofalo D, Bissoli S, et al.
pragmatic cluster randomized
The influence of gender on clinical and
controlled trial. Trials 2012; 13: 73.
social characteristics of patients at
11 Ruggeri M, Bonetto C, Lasalvia A, Fioritti psychosis onset a report from the
A, de Girolamo G, Santonastaso P, et Psychosis Incident Cohort Outcome Study
al. Feasibility and effectiveness of a (PICOS). Psycho! Med 2012; 42: 769-
multi-element psychosocial 80.
intervention for first-episode psychosis:
results from the cluster-randomized 22 Taylor TF. The influence of shame on
controlled GET UP PIANO Trial in a post trauma disorders: have we failed
catchment area of 10 million inhabitants. to see the obvious? Fur J
Schizophr Bull 2015; 41: 1192-203. Psychotraumatol 2015; 6: 28847.

12 Jablensky A, Sartorius N, Ernberg G, 23 Hammersley P, Dias A, Todd G,


Anker M, Korten A, Cooper JE, et al. Bowen-Jones K, Reilly B, Bentall RP.
Schizophrenia: manifestations, Childhood trauma and hallucinations in
incidence and course in different bipolar affective disorder: preliminary
cultures. A World Health Organization ten- investigation. Br J Psychiatry 2003;
country study. Psycho! Med Monogr 182: 543-7.
Suppl 1992; 20: 1-97. 24 Garety PA, Bebbington P, Fowler D,
Freeman D, Kuipers E. Implications for
13 Wing JK, Babor T, Brugha T, Burke J,
neurobiological research of cognitive
Cooper JE, Giel R, et al. SCAN. Schedules
models of psychosis: a theoretical
for Clinical Assessment in
paper. Psycho! Med 2007; 37: 1377-91.
Neuropsychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry
1990; 47: 589-93. 25 Gracie A, Freeman D, Green S, Garety PA,
Kuipers E, Hardy A, et al. The association
14 Bifulco, A, Bernazzani 0 Moran PM,
between traumatic experience, paranoia
Jacobs C. The childhood experience of
and hallucinations: a test of the
care and abuse questionnaire (CECA.Q):
predictions of psychological models. Acta
validation in a community series. Br!
Psychiatr Scand 2007; 116: 280-9.
Clin Psycho! 2005; 44: 563-81.
26 Fergusson DM, McLeod GF, Norwood U.
15 Barkus EJ, Stirling J, Hopkins RS, Lewis S.
Childhood sexual abuse and adult
Cannabis-induced psychosis-like
developmental outcomes: findings from a
experiences are associated with high
30-year longitudinal study in New Zealand.
schizotypy. Psychopathology 2006; 39:
Child Abuse Negl 2013; 37: 664-74.
175-8.
27 Haug E, Oie M, Andreassen OA,
16 Aas M, Navari S, Gibbs A, Mondelli V, Bratlien U, Nelson B, Aas M, et al.
Fisher HL, Morgan C, et al. Is there a Anomalous self-experience and
link between childhood trauma, cognition, childhood trauma in first-episode
and amygdala and hippocampus volume schizophrenia. Compr
in first-episode psychosis? Schizophr Psychiatry 2015; 56: 35-41.
Res 2012; 137: 73-9.
28 Myin-Germeys I, Krabbendam L,
17 Neria Y, Bromet EJ, Sievers S. Trauma

156
Delespaul PA, Van Os J. Sex differences in stress as a factor in the response of rat
emotional reactivity to daily life stress in brain catecholamine metabolism to
psychosis. J Clin Psychiatry 2004; 65: delta8-tetrahydrocannabinol. Eur J
805-9. Pharmacol 1977; 41: 171-82.
29 Myin-Germeys I, Van Os J. Stress- 37 Read J, Perry BD, Moskowitz A,
reactivity in psychosis: evidence for an Connolly J. The contribution of
affective pathway to psychosis. Clin early traumatic events to
Psycho! Rev 2007; 27: 409-24. schizophrenia in some patients: a
30 Kaufman J, Plotsky PM, Nemeroff CB, traumagenic neurodevelopmental
Charney DS. Effects of early adverse model. Psychiatry 2001; 64:
experiences on brain structure and 319-45.
function: clinical implications. Biol 38 Banducci AN, Hoffman E, Lejuez
Psychiatry 2000; 48: 778-90. CW, Koenen KC. The relationship
31 Douglas KR, Chan G, Gelernter J, Arias Al, between child abuse and negative
Anton RF, Weiss RD. Adverse childhood outcomes among substance users:
events as risk factors for substance psychopathology, health, and
dependence: partial mediation by mood comorbidities. Addict Behav 2014;
and anxiety disorders. Addict Behav 39: 1522-7.
2010; 35: 7-13. 39 Duhig M, Patterson S, Connell M,
32 Wicks S, Hjern A, Gunnell D, Lewis G, Foley S, Capra C, Dark F, et al. The
Delman C. Social adversity in prevalence and correlates of
childhood and the risk of developing childhood trauma in patients with
psychosis: a national cohort study. early psychosis. Aust NZ!
Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162: 1652-7. Psychiatry 2015; 49: 651-9.
33 Tosato S, Lasalvia A, Bonetto C, 40 Fisher HL, Morgan C, Dazzan P, Craig
Mazzoncini R, Cristofalo D, De Santi K, TK, Morgan K, Hutchinson G, et al.
et al. The impact of cannabis use on Gender differences in the association
age of onset and clinical characteristics between childhood abuse and
in first-episode psychotic patients. Data psychosis. Br! Psychiatry 2009; 194:
from the Psychosis Incident Cohort 319-25.
Outcome Study (PICOS). J Psychiatr Res 41 Fisher HL, Craig TK, Fearon P, Morgan
2013; 47: 438-44. K, Dazzan P, Lappin J, et al. Reliability
34 Collip D, Myin-Germeys I, Van Os J. and comparability of psychosis
Does the concept of 'sensitization' patients' retrospective reports of
provide a plausible mechanism for the childhood abuse. Schizophr Bull
putative link between the 2011; 37: 546-53.
environment and schizophrenia? 42 Hardt J, Rutter M. Validity of adult
Schizophr Bull 2008; 34: 220-5. retrospective reports of adverse childhood
35 Suplita RL, Eisenstein SA, Neely MH, experiences: review of the evidence. J
Moise AM, Hohmann AG. Cross- Child Psycho! Psychiatry 2004; 45:
sensitization and cross-tolerance 260-73.
between exogenous cannabinoid 43 Poulton R, Moffitt TE, Silva PA. The Dunedin
antinociception and endocannabinoid Multidisciplinary Health and Development
mediated stress-induced analgesia. Study: overview of the first 40 years, with
Neuropharmaco/ 2008; 54: 161-71. an eye to the future. Soc Psychiatry
36 MacLean KI, Littleton JM. Environmental Psychiatr Epidemiol 2015; 50: 679-93.
Data supplement to Tomassi et al. Influence of childhood trauma on diagnosis and substance
use in first-episode psychosis Br J Psychiatry doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.194019
.

Data supplement DS1


THE GET UP GROUP includes:
(update April 08 2013)

GET UP - Genetics, Endophenotypes, Treatment: Understanding early Psychosis


National Coordinator: Professor Mirella Ruggeri (Verona)

Leading Project: PIANO (Psychosis: Early Intervention and Assessment of Needs and Outcome)
Scientific Coordinator: Mirella Ruggeri (Verona)
Administrative Leading Institution: Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Regione
Veneto
Coordinating Centre: Mario Ballarin, Maria Elena Bertani, Sarah Bissoli, Chiara Bonetto, Doriana
Cristofalo, Katia De Santi, Antonio Lasalvia, Silvia Lunardi, Valentina Negretto, Sara Poli, Sarah
Tosato, Maria Grazia Zamboni

Project TRUMPET (TRaining and Understanding of Service Models for Psychosis Early Treatment)
Scientific Coordinator: Giovanni De Girolamo (Bologna and Brescia)
Administrative Leading Institution: Agenzia Sanitaria e Sociale Regionale, Regione Emilia
Romagna
Coordinating Centre: Angelo Fioritti, Giovanni Neri, Francesca Pileggi, Paola Rucci

Project GUITAR (Genetic data Utilization and Implementation of Targeted Drug Administration
in the Clinical Routine)
Scientific Coordinator: Massimo Gennarelli (Brescia)
Administrative Leading Institution: IRCCS Centro S.Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia
Coordinating Centre: Luisella Bocchio Chiavetto, Catia Scasselatti, Roberta Zanardini

Project CONTRABASS
COgnitive Neuroendophenotypes for Treatment and RehAbilitation of psychoses: Brain imaging,
InfAmmation and StreSS
Scientific Coordinator: Paolo Brambilla (Udine and Verona)
Administrative Leading Institution: Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Regione
Veneto
Coordinating Centre: Marcella Bellani, Alessandra Bertoldo, Veronica Marinelli, Cinzia Perlini,
Gianluca Rambaldelli

1
ENROLLMENT AND TREATMENT RESEARCH UNITS:
RESEARCH UNIT Western Veneto:
Coordinator: Antonio Lasalvia (Verona).
Administrative Leading Institution: Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona.
Coordinating Centre: Mariaelena Bertani, Sarah Bissoli, Lorenza Lazzarotto.
Participating MHCs: TAU Arm: Ulss 3 (Bassano), Ulss 4 Alto Vicentino (Thiene), Ulss 5 Montecchio
(Centro; Sud), Ulss 6 Vicenza ( Secondo), Ulss 18 Rovigo (Rovigo), Ulss 20 Verona ( II Servizio), Ulss 22
Bussolengo (Isola della Scala).
Experimental Arm: Ulss 5 Montecchio (Nord), Ulss 6 Vicenza (Primo; Noventa), Ulss 18 Rovigo ( Badia),
Ulss 19 Adria (Adria), Ulss 20 Verona (I Servizio; III Servizio; La Filanda),Ulss 21 Legnago (Il Tulipano; il
Girasole).
MHCs Reference Persons: Sonia Bardella, Francesco Gardellin, Dario Lamonaca, Antonio Lasalvia, Marco
Lunardon, Renato Magnabosco, Marilena Martucci, Stylianos Nicolau Francesco Nifosi, Michele
Pavanati, Massimo Rossi, Carlo Piazza, Gabriella Piccione, Annalisa Sala, Benedetta Stefani, Spyridon
Zotos.
CBT Staff: Mirko Balbo, Ileana Boggian, Enrico Ceccato, Rosa DallAgnola, Francesco Gardellin, Barbara
Girotto, Claudia Goss, Dario Lamonaca, Antonio Lasalvia, Alessia Mai, Annalisa Pasqualini, Michele
Pavanati, Carlo Piazza, Gabriella Piccione, Stefano Roccato, Alberto Rossi, Spyridon Zotos.
Family Intervention Staff: Flavia Aldi, Barbara Bianchi, Paola Cappellari, Raffaello Conti, Laura De Battisti,
Silvia Merlin,. Tecla Pozzan, Lucio Sarto.
Case Management Staff : Andrea Brazzoli, Antonella Campi, Roberta Carmagnani, Sabrina Giambelli,
Annalisa Gianella, Lino Lunardi, Davide Madaghiele, Paola Maestrelli, Lidia Paiola, Elisa Posteri, Loretta
Viola, Valentina Zamberlan, Marta Zenari.
Biological Sample processing and support to Brain Imaging precedures: Sarah Tosato, Martina Zanoni,
Giovanni Bonadonna, Mariacristina Bonomo.

RESEARCH UNIT Eastern Veneto:


Coordinator: Paolo Santonastaso.
Administrative Leading Institution: University of Padua.
Coordinating Centre: Carla Cremonese, Paolo Scocco, Angela Veronese.
Participating MHCs: TAU Arm: Ulss 8 ( Castelfranco), Ulss 9 (Treviso Nord; Oderzo), Ulss 10 (San Don di
Piave), Ulss 12 (Venezia; Mestre sud), Ulss 13 (Dolo), Ulss 14 (Piove di Sacco), Ulss 15 ( Cittadella), Ulss
16 (II Servizio), Ulss 17 (Este; Montagnana).
Experimental Arm: Ulss 8 (Montebelluna; Valdobbiadene), Ulss 9 (Treviso; Mogliano Veneto), Ulss 10
(PortogReserach Unitaro), Ulss 12 (Mestre Centro), Ulss 13 (Mirano), Ulss 14 (Chioggia I ; Cavarzere),
Ulss 15 (Camposanpiero), Ulss 16 (I Srvizio; III Servizio), Ulss 17 (Monselice; Conselve).
MHCs Reference Persons: Patrizia Anderle, Andrea Angelozzi, Isabelle Amalric Gabriella Baron,, Enrico
Bruttomesso Fabio Candeago, Franco Castelli, Maria Chieco, Carla Cremonese, Enrico Di Costanzo,
Mario Derossi, Michele Doriguzzi, Osvaldo Galvano, Marcello Lattanzi, Roberto Lezzi, Marisa Marcato,
Alessandro Marcolin, Franco Marini, Stefano Marino, Manlio Matranga, Elisabetta Sabbadin, , Rossana
Riolo, Maria Zucchetto, Flavio Zadro.
CBT Staff: Daniela Argenti, Giovanni Austoni, Maria Bianco, Stefania Bordino, Linda Cibiniel, Maria Chieco,
Marco DallAsta, Filippo Dario, Francesca Dassi, Alessandro Di Risio, Aldo Gatto, Simona Gran,
Emanuele Favero, Anna Franceschini, Silvia Friederici, Vanna Marangon, Marisa Marcato, Stefano
Marino, Giorgio Martinelli, Michela Pascolo, Maya Piaia, Luana Ramon, Elisabetta Sabbadin, Paolo
Scocco, Mara Semenzin, Angela Veronese, Stefania Zambolin, Maria Zucchetto. Anna Dominoni.
2
Family Intervention Staff: Antonella Buffon, Carla Cremonese, Elena Di Bortolo, Silvia Friederici, Stefania
Fortin,Marisa Marcato, Francesco Matarrese, Simona Mogni, Novella Nicodemo, Alessio Russo,
Alessandra Silvestro, Elena Turella, Paola Viel.
Case Management Staff: Lorenzo Andreose, Mario Boenco, Daniela Bottega, Loretta Bressan, Arianno
Cabbia, Elisabetta Canesso, Romina Cian, Caludia Dal Piccol, Maria Dalla Pasqua, Cinzia De Gasperi,
Anna Di Prisco, Lorena Mantellato, Monica Luison, Sandra Morgante, Mirna Santi, Moreno Sacillotto,
Mauro Scabbio, Patrizia Sponga, MLuisa Sguotto, Flavia Stach, MGrazia Vettorato.
Biological Sample processing and support to Brain Imaging precedures: Oscar Cabianca, Amalia Valente,
Livio Caberlotto, Alberto Passoni, Patrizia Flumian, Luigino Daniel, Massimo Gion, Saverio Stanziale,
Flora Alborino, Vladimiro Bortolozzo, Lucio Bacelle, Leonarda Bicciato, Daniela Basso, Filippo Navaglia,
Fabio Manoni, Mauro Ercolin.

RESEARCH UNIT Emilia:


Coordinators: Giovanni Neri, Franco Giubilini.
Administrative Leading Institution: Azienda ULSS, Parma
Coordinating Centre: Massimiliano Imbesi, Emanuela Leuci, Fausto Mazzi, Enrico Semrov.
Participating MHCs: TAU Arm: Piacenza (Castel S.Giovanni), Parma (Parma Est; Sud Est; Valli Taro e
Ceno), Reggio Emilia (CastelNovo nei Monti; Montecchio), Modena (Mirandola; Polo Ovest; Sassuolo;
Pavullo).
Experimental Arm : Piacenza (Piacenza; Fiorenzuola), Parma (Nord; Ovest; Fidenza), Reggio Emilia
(Correggio; Guastalla; Reggio Emilia III; Reggio Emilia; Scandiano), Modena ( Carpi; Polo Est; Vignola).
MHCs Reference Persons: Silvio Anelli, Mario Amore, Laura Bigi, Welsch Britta, Giovanna Barazzoni Anna,
Rubes Bonatti, Maria Borziani, Stefano Crosato, Isabella Fabris, Raffaele Galluccio, Margherita Galeotti,
Mauro Gozzi, Vanna Greco, Emanuele Guagnini, Stefania Pagani, Silvio Maccherozzi, Raffaello Malvasi,
Francesco Marchi, Ermanno Melato, Elena Mazzucchi, Franco Marzullo, Pietro Pellegrini, Nicoletta
Petrolini, Donatella Silvia Rizzi, Paolo Volta.
CBT Staff: Silvio Anelli, Franca Bonara, Elisabetta Brusamonti, Roberto Croci, Ivana Flamia, Francesca
Fontana, Romina Losi, Fausto Mazzi, Roberto Marchioro, Stefania Pagani, Luigi Raffaini, Luca Ruju,
Antonio Saginario, Giulia Stabili, Grazia Tondelli.
Family Intervention Staff: Lucia Bernardelli, Federica Bonacini, Annaluisa Florindo, Marina Merli, Patrizia
Nappo, Lorena Sola, Ornella Tondelli, Matteo Tonna, MTeresa Torre, Morena Tosatti, Gloria Venturelli,
Daria Zampolli.
Case Management Staff: Antonia Bernardi, Cinzia Cavalli, Lorena Cigala, Cinzia Ciraudo, Antonia Di Bari,
Lorena Ferri, Fabiana Gombi, Sonia Leurini, Elena Mandatelli, Stefano Maccaferri, Mara Oroboncoide,
Barbara Pisa, Cristina Ricci.
Biological Sample processing and support to Brain Imaging precedures: Enrica Poggi, Mara
Oroboncoide, Corrado Zurlini, Monica Malpeli, Rossana Colla, Elvira Teodori, Luigi Vecchia, Rocco
D'Andrea, Tommaso Trenti , Paola Paolini

RESEARCH UNIT Romagna:


Coordinators: Francesca Pileggi, Daniela Ghigi.
Administrative Leading Institution: Azienda ULSS, Rimini
Coordinating Centre: Mariateresa Gagliostro , Michela Pratelli, Paola Rucci
Participating MHCs: TAU Arm: Bologna (Zanolini; Scalo; Casalecchio; Vergato; San Giovanni), Ferrara (CSA
Ferrara; SIPI Ferrara Sud; Codigoro; Portomaggiore), Ravenna (Ravenna; Fenza), Forl (Forl), Cesena
(Cesena), Rimini (Riccione).
Experimental Arm: Bologna (Mazzacorati; Tiarini, Nani; S. Lazzaro; Budrio; San Giorgio), Imola
(UOT_Imola), Ferarra (Copparo; Ferrara Nord; Cento), Ravenna (Lugo), Cesena (Rubicone), Rimini
(Rimini).
3
MHCs Reference Persons: Antonio Antonelli, Luana Battistini, Francesca Bellini, Eva Bonini, Caterina
Bruschi Rossella Capelli, Cinzia Di Domizio, Chiara Drei, Giuseppe Fucci, Alessandra Gualandi, Maria
Rosaria Grazia, Anna M. Losi, Franca Mazzanti Paola Mazzoni, Daniela Marangoni, Giuseppe Monna,
Marco Morselli, Alessandro Oggioni, Silvio Oprandi, Walter Paganelli, Morena Passerini, Maria Piscitelli,
Gregorio Reggiani, Gabriella Rossi, Federica Salvatori, Simona Trasforini, , Carlo Uslenghi, Simona
Veggetti,
CBT Staff: Giovanna Bartolucci, Rosita Baruffa, Francesca Bellini, Raffaella Bertelli, Lidia Borghi, Patrizia
Ciavarella, Cinzia DiDomizio, Giuseppe Monna, Alessandro Oggioni, Elisabetta Paltrinieri, Maria
Piscitelli, Francesco Rizzardi, Piera Serra, Damiano Suzzi, Uslenghi Carlo.
Family Intervention Staff: Paolo Arienti, Fabio Aureli, Rosita Avanzi, Vincenzo Callegari, Alessandra
Corsino, Paolo Host, Rossella Michetti, Michela Pratelli,Francesco Rizzo, Paola Simoncelli, Elena Soldati,
Eraldo Succi.
Case Management Staff: Massimo Bertozzi, Elisa Canetti,Luca Cavicchioli, Elisa Ceccarelli, Stefano Cenni,
Glenda Marzola, Vanessa Gallina, Carla Leoni, Andrea Olivieri, Elena Piccolo, Sabrina Ravagli, Rosaria
Russo, Daniele Tedeschini.
Biological Sample processing and support to Brain Imaging precedures : Marina Verenini, Walter Abram,
Veronica Granata, Alessandro Curcio, Giovanni Guerra, Samuela Granini, Lara Natali, Enrica Montanari,
Fulvia Pasi, Umbertina Ventura, Stefania Valenti, Masi Francesca, Rossano Farneti, Paolo Ravagli,
Romina Floris, Otello Maroncelli, Gianbattista Volpones, Donatella Casali.

RESEARCH UNIT Firenze:


Coordinator: Maurizio Miceli.
Administrative Leading Institution: Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze
Coordinating Centre: Maurizio Miceli.
Participating MHCs: TAU Arm: MOM SMA 5; MOM SMA 8; MOM SMA 11; MOM SMA 12.
Experimental Arm: MOM SMA 3; MOM SMA 7; MOM SMA 9; MOM SMA 10.
MHCs Reference Persons: Andrea Bencini, Massimo Cellini, Luca De Biase, Leonardo Barbara, Liedl
Charles, Maurizio Miceli, Cristina Pratesi, Andrea Tanini, Roberto Leonetti.
CBT Staff: Massimo Cellini, Maurizio Miceli, Riccardo Loparrino, Cristina Pratesi, Cinzia Ulivelli,
Family Intervention Staff: Cristina Cussoto, Nico Dei, Enrico Fumanti, Manuela Pantani, Gregorio Zeloni.
Case Management Staff: Rossella Bellini, Roberta Cellesi, Nadia Dorigo, Patrizia Gull, Luisa Ialeggio,
Maria Pisanu.
Biological Sample processing and support to Brain Imaging precedures: Graziella Rinaldi, Angela Konze

RESEARCH UNIT Milano Niguarda:


Coordinator: Angelo Cocchi.
Administrative Leading Institution: Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Niguarda Ca Granda, Milano
Coordinating Centre: Anna Meneghelli
Participating MHCs: TAU Arm: corso Plebisciti; via Mario Bianco.
Experimental Arm: via Cherasco e via Livigno; via Litta Modignani.
MHC Reference Persons: Maria Frova , Emiliano Monzani, Alberto Zanobio, Marina Malagoli, Roberto
Pagani.
CBT Staff: Simona Barbera, Carla Morganti, Emiliano Monzani, Elisabetta Sarzi Amad.
Family Intervention Staff: Virginia Brambilla, Anita Montanari.
Case Management Staff: Giori Caterina, Carmelo Lopez.

4
Biological Sample processing and support to Brain Imaging precedures: Alessandro Marocchi, Andrea
Moletta, Maurizio Sberna

RESEARCH UNIT Milano S. Paolo:


Coordinator: Silvio Scarone.
Administrative Leading Institution: Azienda ULSS San Paolo, Milano
Coordinating Centre: Maria Laura Manzone
Participating MHCs: TAU Arm: CPS Zona 14 (Barabino).
Experimental Arm: Rozzano; Zona 15 (Conca del Naviglio); Zona 16 (San Vigilio).
MHC Reference Persons: Barbera Barbara, Luisa Mari, Maria L. Manzone, Edoardo Razzini.
CBT Staff: Yvonne Bianchi, MRosa Pellizzer, Antonella Verdecchia.
Family Intervention Staff: MGabriella Sferrazza, MLaura Manzone, Carmine Pismataro.
Case Management Staff: Benedetta Cerrai, Alessandra Gambino, Rosa Panarello.
Biological Sample processing and support to Brain Imaging precedures: Gian Vico Melzi D'Eril,
Alessandra Barassi, Rosana Pacciolla, Gloria Faraci

RESEARCH UNIT Bolzano:


Coordinator: Stefano Torresani (Bolzano).
Administrative Leading Institution: Azienda Sanitaria,, Bolzano
Participating MHCs: TAU Arm: none
Experimental Arm: Bolzano Rossini; Bolzano del Ronco.
MHC Reference Persons: Fabio Carpi, Soelva Margit.
CBT Staff: Monica Anderlan, Michele De Francesco, Efi Duregger, Stefano Torresani, Carla Vettori.
Family Intervention Staff: Carpi Fabio, Doimo Sabrina, Kompatscher Erika, Soelva Margit, Stefano
Torresani
Case Management Staff: Forer Michael, Kerschbaumer Helene.
Biological Sample processing and support to Brain Imaging precedures: Anna Gamper, Maira Nicoletti

PSYCHOTHERAPISTS SUPPORTING TREATMENTS IN THE EXPERIMENTAL ARM:


Chiara Acerbi, Daniele Aquilino, Silvia Azzali, Luca Bensi, Sarah Bissoli, Davide Cappellari, Elisa Casana,
Nadia Campagnola, Elisa Dal Corso, Elisabetta Di Micco, Erika Gobbi, Laura Ferri, Erika Gobbi, Laura
Mairaghi, Sara Malak, Luca Mesiano, Federica Paterlini, Michela Perini, Elena Maria Puliti, Rosaria Rispoli,
Elisabetta Rizzo, Chiara Sergenti, Manuela Soave, Elisabetta Di Micco, Rosaria Rispoli.

EXPERTS SUPERVISING TREATMENTS IN THE EXPRERIMENTAL ARM:


Andrea Alpi, Laura Bislenghi, Tiziana Bolis, Francesca Colnaghi, Simona Fascendini, Silvia Grignani, Anna
Meneghelli, Giovanni Patelli.

SPECIFIC TOPICS RESEARCH UNITS:


RESEARCH UNIT Life Events Firenze - Coordinator: Carlo Faravelli
Coordinating Centre: Silvia Casale
Administrative Leading Institution: University of Florence

RESEARCH UNIT Communications Skills - Coordinator: Christa Zimmermann

5
Coordinating Centre: Giuseppe Deledda, Claudia Goss, Mariangela Mazzi, Michela Rimondini.
Administrative Leading Institution: University of Verona

RESEARCH UNIT Genetics-IRCCS, FBF Brescia Coordinator: Massimo Gennarelli


Coordinating Centre: Catia Scassellati, Cristian Bonvicini, Sara Longo
Administrative Leading Institution: IRCCS Centro S.Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia

RESEARCH UNIT Neu ropsicopha rmacology-I RCCS, FBF Brescia Coordinator: Luisella Bocchio Chiavetto
Coordinating Centre: Roberta Zanardini
Administrative Leading Institution: IRCCS Centro S.Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia

RESEARCH UNIT Molecular Biology, AFaR, FBF, Roma Coordinator: Mariacarla Ventriglia

Coordinating Centre: Rosanna Squitti

Administrative Leading Institution: Department of Neuroscience, AFaR-Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome,


Italy

RESEARCH UNIT LENITEM - IRCCS, FBF Brescia Coordinator: Giovanni Frisoni


Coordinating Centre: Michela Pievani

Administrative Leading Institution: IRCCS Centro S.Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia

RESEARCH UNIT RUBIN, Udine-Verona Coordinator: Matteo Balestrieri


Coordinating Centre: Paolo Brambilla, Cinzia Perlini, Veronica Marinelli, Marcella Bellani, Gianluca
Rambaldelli, Alessandra Bertoldo, Paolo Carpeggiani, Alberto Beltramello, Franco Alessandrini,
Francesca Pizzini, Giada Zoccatelli, Maurizio Sberna, Angela Konze
Administrative Leading Institution: DISM, Universit di Udine, Udine (Signora Marina Dorligh)

RESEARCH UNIT STRESS, University of Pavia Coordinator: Pierluigi Politi


Coordinating Centre: Enzo Emanuele, Natascia Brondino.

RESEARCH UNIT Neuroimmunologiy-IRCCS S. Raffaele, Milano Coordinator: Gianvito Martino


Coordinating Centre: Alessandra Bergami e Roberto Zarbo

RESEARCH UNIT Animal Models, Univ. Milano Coordinator: Marco Andrea Riva

Coordinating Centre: Fabio Fumagalli, Raffaella Molteni, Francesca Calabrese, Gianluigi Guidotti,
AlessiaLuoni, Flavia Macchi.

INDEPENDENT EVALUATORS AND RESEARCHERS SUPPORTING THE ONSITE DATA COLLECTION :

Stefania Artioli, Marco Baldetti, Milena Bizzocchi, Donatella Bolzon, Elisa Bonello, Giorgia Cacciari, Claudia
Carraresi, MTeresa Cascio, Gabriele Caselli, Karin Furlato, Sara Garlassi, Alessandro Gavarini, Silvia
Lunardi, Fabio Macchetti, Valentina Marteddu, Giorgia Plebiscita, Sara Poli, Stefano Totaro.

FAMILIES AND USERS ASSOCIATION (AITSAM):


Tali Corona Mattioli

INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD:


PIANO: Paul Bebbington, Max Birchwood, Paola Dazzan, Elisabeth Kuipers, Graham Thornicroft;
GUITAR: Carmine Pariante; CONTRABASS: Steve Lawrie, Carmine Pariante, Jair C. Soares

6
S. Tomassi, S. Tosato, V. Mondelli, C. Faravelli, A. Lasalvia, G. Fioravanti, C. Bonetto, A. Fioritti, C.
Cremonese, R. Lo Parrino, K. De Santi, A. Meneghelli, S. Torresani, G. De Girolamo, E. Semrov, M.
Pratelli, D. Cristofalo, M. Ruggeri and the GET UP Group
BJP2017, 211:151-156.
Access the most recent version at DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.194019

Supplementary material can be found at:


http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/suppl/2017/07/17/bjp.bp.116.194019.DC1

This article cites 40 articles, 3 of which you can access for free at:
http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/211/3/151#BIBL
To obtain reprints or permission to reproduce material from this paper, please
write to

http://bjp.rcpsych.org/ on September 17, 2017


Published by The Royal College of Psychiatrists

To subscribe to The British Journal of Psychiatry go to:

S-ar putea să vă placă și