Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Rezumat
Prezentul articol se refer la efectul lovitur de bici(bullwhip effect),1 care
influeneaz negativ performana lanului de aprovizionare-livrare. Acest efect este
nregistrat n diferite sectoare economice, de la bunuri de larg consum la produse IT.
Consecinele pentru membrii lanului de aprovizionare-livrare sunt urmtoarele: costuri
sporite, profitabilitate diminuat, intervale de reaprovizionare mai mari i un grad mai
sczut de disponibilitate a produselor. Principalii factori care genereaz acest efect sunt
tipurile de stimulente acordate de furnizori clienilor din aval, distorsionarea informaiei,
practicile de formulare i onorare a comenzilor, politicile de pre care ncurajeaz
cumprarea n avans i comportamentul specific al membrilor lanului de aprovizionare-
livrare axat pe optimizarea local. Singura modalitate prin care membrii lanului pot
nltura efectul lovitur de bici este stimularea coordonrii ntre stadiile succesive ale
lanului de aprovizionare-livrare. Printre strategiile ce pot fi considerate n acest sens, se
nscriu alinierea scopurilor i obiectivelor, comunicarea informaiilor ntre membri,
reaprovizionarea controlat de un singur stadiu al lanului de aprovizionare-livrare,
strategiile de mbuntire a performanelor operaionale, stabilizarea comenzilor cu
ajutorul unor strategii de pre adecvate, crearea de parteneriate strategice i dezvoltarea
ncrederii.
Incidena i amplitudinea efectului lovitur de bici pot fi diminuate prin strategii
i decizii care sunt armonizate ntre diferitele niveluri ale lanului de aprovizionare-livrare.
n efortul de reducere a efectului lovitur de bici, cuvintele cheie sunt cooperarea,
coordonarea, comunicarea i ncrederea.
Abstract
The present article refers to the bullwhip effect that negatively influences the
supply chain performance. This effect is experienced by various industries, from fast
moving consumer goods to IT products. The consequences for the supply chain members
are the following: increased costs, lower profitability, longer lead times and lower product
availability. The main factors that generate this effect are the types of incentives provided
by suppliers to the downstream customers, the information distortion, the order placing
practices, the pricing policies encouraging the forward buying and the specific behavior of
the supply chain members focused on local optimization. The only way in which supply
chain members may eradicate the bullwhip effect is to enhance coordination among the
subsequent stages. Some of the strategies to be considered are the alignment of goals and
objectives, data sharing among members, single stage control of replenishment, strategies
26 Amfiteatru Economic
The logistics of merchandise AE
for the improvement of the operational performance, stabilizing orders with appropriate
pricing strategies and building strategic partnerships and trust.
The incidence and amplitude of the bullwhip effect may be reduced by strategies and
decisions that are harmonized along the stages of the supply chain. The key words in the
endeavor to diminish the bullwhip effect are cooperation, coordination, communication and
trust.
Introducere Introduction
Scopul principal al acestui articol The main goal of the present article
este explorarea coninutului i is to explore the content and
consecinelor efectului lovitur de bici consequences of the bullwhip effect.
(bullwhip effect). Totodat, articolul Simultaneously, the article discusses the
abordeaz aspecte privind incidena incidence of the bullwhip effect in various
efectului n diferite sectoare de activitate sectors of activity and the causes that
i cauzele care genereaz un astfel de generate such an effect. The major
efect. Sunt prezentate, de asemenea, strategies to increase coordination in
strategiile majore care mbuntesc
supply chains in order to avoid or
coordonarea n lanurile de aprovizionare-
livrare, n vederea evitrii sau diminurii diminish the bullwhip effect are also
efectului lovitur de bici. presented.
120
120
Consumator 100
100 Consumer
80
80 Retailer
Demand
Detailist
Cererea
60 60 Wholesaler
Angrosist Producer
40 40
Raw material supplier
20 20
Productor
0 0
Furnizor de
ai
ar
n
ay
ov
l
p
ov
ar
p
Ju
Iu
materii prime
Ja
Ia
Se
Se
M
M
M
N
M
N
Timpul Time
28 Amfiteatru Economic
The logistics of merchandise AE
Totui, printre primele cercetri However, among the first research
referitoare la relaia dintre stocuri i studies relative to the relationship
comenzi la diferitele niveluri logistice, se between inventory and orders at various
nscriu cele realizate de Forrester n anii logistic stages range those achieved by
'60 (Forrester, 1961). Cu ajutorul metodei Forrester in the 60s (Forrester, 1961).
simulrii, Forrester a dovedit importana Based on the simulation method, Forrester
integrrii fluxurilor de informaii i showed the importance of the integration
fluxurilor materiale, formulnd totodat of the information and material flows and
teoria dinamicii industriale. n acelai formulated the industrial dynamics
deceniu, Burbidge a subliniat importana theory. During that decade, Burbidge
sincronizrii comenzilor, iar n anii '80 a underlined the importance of order
susinut legea dinamicii industriale, synchronization and in the 80s he
conform creia, n cazul n care cererea se supported the law of industrial dynamics,
transmite prin mai multe stadii ce aplic according to which if demand is
proceduri de comand bazate pe controlul transmitted along a series of stages that
stocurilor, variaia cererii va spori cu apply stock control ordering, the demand
fiecare transfer. variation will increase with each transfer.
30 Amfiteatru Economic
The logistics of merchandise AE
3. Impactul asupra performanei 3. The impact on performance
Efectul lovitur de bici The bullwhip effect has a direct
influeneaz n mod direct indicatorii de influence upon the performance indicators
performan, la fiecare nivel al lanului de at each stage of the supply chain. The
aprovizionare-livrare. Impactul este impact is generated by the conflict
generat de conflictul dintre obiectivele between the objectives of the subsequent
stadiilor succesive ale reelei i de stages and the information distortion. The
distorsionarea informaiilor. Efectul este effect is visible in the variation of costs,
vizibil n variaia costurilor, a intervalului lead time, product availability and
de reaprovizionare, a disponibilitii profitability.
produselor i profitabilitii.
Categoriile majore de costuri The major cost categories affected
afectate de efectul lovitur de bici sunt by the bullwhip effect are the following:
urmtoarele:
a) Costurile de producie. a) Manufacturing costs. The
Productorul i planific activitatea pe baza producer plans its activity based on the
fluxului de comenzi primite de la nivelul stream of orders received from the
imediat din aval (distribuitori/ angrositi / immediate downstream stage
detailiti). Datorit efectului lovitur de (wholesalers/distributors/retailers). Due to
bici, seriile de fabricaie vor nregistra o the bullwhip effect, the production runs
variaie mai mare comparativ cu variaia will witness a larger variability than that
cererii utilizatorului final. Un productor ce specific to the demand of the end-user. A
reacioneaz rapid la schimbrile privind manufacturer that is very responsive to
comenzile primite nu va beneficia de the changes in the received orders does
economii de scal sau de avantajele not enjoy economies of scale and the
produciei continue. Costurile de producie advantages of continuous production runs.
cresc fie datorit capacitii excedentare, fie The manufacturing costs increase due to
datorit surplusului de stocuri. either excess capacity or excess inventory.
b) Costul stocurilor i costurile b) Inventory and warehousing
de depozitare. Efectul lovitur de bici costs. The bullwhip effect increases the
sporete costul stocurilor i costurile de inventory and warehousing costs.
depozitare. In order to meet the variable
Pentru a satisface cererea variabil demand expressed by the downstream
exprimat de nivelurile din avalul levels, suppliers may build higher
lanului, furnizorii vor constitui stocuri inventories. Consequently they will need
mai mari. n consecin, vor avea nevoie additional storage space that will incur a
de spaiu de depozitare suplimentar, care raise in costs.
va implica o cretere a costurilor.
c) Costurile de transport. Variaia c) Transportation costs. The
cererii exprimate de nivelurile lanului de variation in the demand expressed by the
aprovizionare-livrare conduce la creterea supply chain stages implies increased
cheltuielilor de transport. Furnizorii transportation costs. Suppliers must invest
trebuie s investeasc resurse n capaciti resources in additional transportation
de transport suplimentare, pentru a capacity to meet the unexpected demand
satisface creterile neateptate ale cererii. peaks. Either owned by the organization
Capacitatea suplimentar, fie c este or rented for a specific high-demand
proprietatea organizaiei, fie c este period, the extra capacity will entail costs.
nchiriat, va genera costuri.
32 Amfiteatru Economic
The logistics of merchandise AE
4. Principalele cauze ale efectului 4. The major causes of the bullwhip
lovitur de bici effect
Efectul lovitur de bici este The bullwhip effect is generated by
generat de o gam larg de factori. Este a wide array of factors. It is related to the
legat de politicile de optimizare axate pe focus of the optimization policies on each
fiecare nivel al lanului de aprovizionare- stage of the supply chain without
livrare, fr considerarea unor obiective considering common objectives for the
comune pentru ntreaga reea. entire network.
Printre cauzele majore care conduc Among the major causes that lead
la apariia unui decalaj ntre variaia to a gap between the variability in
cererii i variaia comenzilor la furnizori, demand and in orders to suppliers and to
precum i la amplificarea decalajului the amplification of this gap upwards in
respectiv, pe msur ce comenzile se the network range the following:
transmit din aval spre amonte, se nscriu
urmtoarele:
a) Stimulentele oferite. La fiecare a) Incentives provided. At each
nivel al lanului de aprovizionare-livrare, stage of the supply chain, companies use
organizaiile utilizeaz stimulente pentru a incentives to reward behaviors that lead to
recompensa comportamente ce conduc la the increase in own sales and profitability,
o cretere a propriilor vnzri i profituri, irrespective of the impact on the other
indiferent de impactul asupra altor members of the network. For example, a
membri ai reelei. De exemplu, o company may encourage a decline in the
organizaie poate ncuraja un declin al transportation costs, disregarding the
costurilor de transport, fr a lua n effect on the customer service level and
considerare efectul asupra nivelului de the additional inventory burden for the
servire a clientului i povara stocurilor other chain members.
suplimentare pentru ceilali membri ai
reelei. Another example consists in the
Un alt exemplu const n sales force incentives granted during a
stimulentele pentru fora de vnzri, care promotion period according to the
sunt acordate n decursul unei perioade de quantity sold to the next level of the
promovare a vnzrilor, n funcie de supply chain (sell-in), not to the quantity
cantitatea vndut nivelului imediat sold to the final customers (sell-through).
urmtor din aval, nu n funcie de Such incentives applied by a
cantitatea vndut clienilor finali. Astfel manufacturer will increase the sales to
de stimulente aplicate de productor vor distributors without any consideration of
spori vnzrile ctre distribuitori fr a the end-buyer demand, generating large
avea n vedere cererea cumprtorului variability in the order pattern during and
final i vor genera o mare variaie a after the promotion period.
comenzilor nainte i dup campania
promoional.
b) Distorsionarea informaiilor. b) Information distortion. The
Efectul lovitur de bici este nregistrat bullwhip effect is experienced by
de organizaiile care realizeaz previziuni companies that make forecasts that are
ce se bazeaz pe comenzile primite, nu pe based on orders not on demand and that
cerere, i care nu schimb informaii cu do not share information with the other
ceilali membri ai lanului de members of the supply chain.
aprovizionare-livrare.
34 Amfiteatru Economic
The logistics of merchandise AE
Conform unei astfel de practici, According to such a practice, the
furnizorul aloc fiecrui client solicitant, supplier allocates the available product
din volumul disponibil de produse, pe quantity to the customers based on the
baza ponderii comenzii acestuia n share of their orders in the overall volume
volumul total al comenzilor primite. of the orders received.
Totui, clienii care cunosc faptul However, the customers who know
c furnizorul aplic o schem de about the rationing scheme may apply
raionalizare vor recurge la practici de gaming practices that inflate the orders
joc ce vor consta n creterea hoping to get more of the scarce resource.
comenzilor peste nevoia real, n sperana Thus, the supplier has a distorted image
de a obine o cantitate mai mare din about the market demand and may
resursa deficitar. Astfel, furnizorul are o incorrectly perceive the increase in orders
imagine deformat asupra cererii pieei i as a demand augmentation.
poate percepe n mod incorect creterea
comenzilor ca fiind o cretere a cererii.
d) Politicile de pre. Reducerile de d) Price policies. The quantity
pre aplicate de furnizori n funcie de discounts applied by suppliers may shift
volumul comenzilor pot produce mutaii the demand expressed by the next levels
n cererea exprimat de nivelurile din within the chain. An attractive price
avalul lanului de aprovizionare-livrare. during a short-term promotion will
Un pre atractiv oferit n cadrul unei stimulate customers to order quantities
promovri de scurt durat i va stimula larger than the actual demand. The peak
pe clieni s comande cantiti mai mari period in the shipments made by supplier
dect cererea efectiv. Perioada de vrf is followed by an interval with fewer
n privina livrrilor realizate de furnizor shipments and lower sales.
va fi urmat de un interval cu mai puine
comenzi i vnzri mai mici.
e) Comportamentul membrilor e) Behavior of the supply chain
lanului de aprovizionare-livrare. members. The magnitude of the bullwhip
Amploarea efectului lovitur de bici effect also depends on the learning
depinde totodat de problemele de problems within the organizations that
nvare din cadrul organizaiilor membre participate to the supply chain. The
ale lanului de aprovizionare-livrare. companies do not learn from the bullwhip
Organizaiile respective nu nva din effect because the consequences of the
efectul lovitur de bici deoarece actions taken at a particular stage occur in
consecinele aciunilor ntreprinse la un another part of the supply chain. The lack
anumit nivel se manifest n alte pri ale of trust between the members of the
lanului de aprovizionare-livrare. Lipsa de supply chain encourages the opportunistic
ncredere n membrii lanului de approach of each stage and a focus on
aprovizionare livrare ncurajeaz local optimization.
abordarea oportunist la fiecare nivel i
concentrarea asupra optimizrii locale.
Toate cauzele menionate amplific All the above mentioned causes
efectul lovitur de bici i conduc la o amplify the bullwhip effect and lead to an
sub-optimizare pe ansamblul lanului de under-optimization of the entire chain.
aprovizionare-livrare.
36 Amfiteatru Economic
The logistics of merchandise AE
b) Comunicarea datelor ntre b) Data sharing among members.
membri. n sectorul bunurilor de consum, In the consumer goods sector, sharing
comunicarea datelor despre vnzrile cu point of sales data will enhance the
amnuntul, obinute prin sistemul de capability of the supply chain stages to
scanare la casele de marcat, va spori cope with the bullwhip effect. The use of
capacitatea diferitelor niveluri ale lanului appropriate information technology
de a face fa efectului lovitur de bici. solution will ensure for each level more
Utilizarea unor soluii IT adecvate asigur accurate, sufficient and up-to-date
pentru fiecare nivel, informaii mai information about the market demand.
precise, suficiente i actuale despre
cererea pieei.
c) Reaprovizionarea controlat c) Single stage control of
de un singur stadiu al lanului de replenishment. This strategy consists in
aprovizionare-livrare. Aceast strategie selecting only one stage that makes the
const n selectarea unui singur nivel care replenishment decision for the entire
s adopte decizia de reaprovizionare chain. A possible alternative are the
pentru toate nivelurile din lanul de continuous replenishment programs,
aprovizionare-livrare. O variant posibil according to which the wholesaler or the
const n programele de reaprovizionare manufacturer has the responsibility to
continu, conform crora angrosistul sau regularly replenish the retailer inventory
productorul are responsabilitatea de a based on point of sale data or withdrawals
completa periodic stocul detailistului, pe of merchandise from the retailer
baza datelor de la punctele de vnzare, warehouses.
sau de a retrage mrfuri din depozitele
detailistului.
O alt strategie aplicabil este Another potential alternative
stocul gestionat de vnztor, potrivit strategy is the vendor-managed inventory
creia deciziile de reaprovizionare sunt according to which the replenishment
centralizate pentru toi detailitii, la decisions for all retailers are centralized at
nivelul unui distribuitor sau productor the level of the upstream distributor or
din amonte. Astfel, sunt evitate sau manufacturer. The large fluctuations in
diminuate substanial fluctuaiile mari ale orders are thus avoided or substantially
comenzilor. reduced.
d) Strategiile de mbuntire a d) Strategies for the
performanelor operaionale. Efectul improvement of the operational
lovitur de bici este diminuat de decizii performance. The bullwhip effect is
cum sunt: reducerea intervalului de diminished by decisions such as: reducing
reaprovizionare; scderea dimensiunii replenishment lead time, reducing lot
loturilor comandate; raionalizarea pe sizes, rationing based on past sales not on
baza vnzrilor anterioare, nu pe baza share of orders, information sharing to
comenzilor; schimburile de informaii limit gaming.
pentru a limita jocul.
e) Stabilizarea comenzilor cu e) Stabilizing orders with
ajutorul unor strategii de pre appropriate pricing strategies. Instead
adecvate. n locul reducerilor de pre of discounts provided according to the
oferite clienilor n funcie de volumul quantity of each ordered lot, suppliers
fiecrui lot comandat, furnizorii pot may consider the discounts based on the
s considere reducerile bazate pe ntreaga
Concluzii Conclusions
Articolul a explorat principalele The article has explored the major
cauze care genereaz efectul lovitur de causes that generate the bullwhip effect
bici i impactul su asupra performanei and the impact upon the supply chain
lanului de aprovizionare-livrare. performance. At the same time, it has
Totodat, au fost abordate aspecte approached the coordination issue in
referitoare la coordonare, n scopul order to diminish the bullwhip effect.
diminurii efectului lovitur de bici.
38 Amfiteatru Economic
The logistics of merchandise AE
Amploarea i influena efectului pe The size and influence of the
piaa romneasc nu au fost studiate n bullwhip effect on the Romanian market
mod aprofundat. Unele dintre aspectele have not been studied thoroughly. Some
principale ce pot constitui teme de of the main aspects that may represent
cercetare pentru viitoare studii sunt research topics for future studies are
enumerate n continuare: presented below:
incidena efectului lovitur de incidence of the bullwhip effect
bici n diferite sectoare de activitate; in various industries;
impactul efectului lovitur de actual impact of the bullwhip
bici asupra performanei fiecrei effect on the performance of each
organizaii din lanul de aprovizionare- company within a supply chain and on the
livrare i asupra profitului ntregii reele; profitability of the entire network;
obstacolele concrete n calea actual obstacles to coordination
coordonrii n lanul de aprovizionare- within the supply chain;
livrare; methods applied by market
metodele aplicate de operatorii players to diminish the impact of the
pieei pentru a diminua impactul efectului bullwhip effect;
lovitur de bici; benchmarking with the best
compararea cu cele mai bune practices of supply chain coordination in
practici din Romnia i de pe plan Romania and abroad;
mondial, n domeniul coordonrii ntre alternative methods for building
nivelurile lanului de aprovizionare- partnerships among the members of the
livrare; supply chain;
metode alternative de creare a IT solutions for information
parteneriatelor dintre membrii lanului de sharing etc.
aprovizionare-livrare; The results of such studies may
soluii IT pentru comunicarea i contribute to the better understanding of
utilizarea n comun a informaiilor etc. the bullwhip phenomenon as well as to
Rezultatele unor astfel de studii pot the profitable management of resources in
contribui la mai buna nelegere a the entire supply chain. Organizations will
fenomenului lovitur de bici, precum i switch from competing alone in the
la managementul profitabil al resurselor market to competing with the network to
de-a lungul ntregului lan de which they belong against other supply
aprovizionare-livrare. chains.
Pe plan mondial, un numr tot mai Worldwide, an ever greater number
mare de specialiti consider beneficiile of specialists consider the benefits of
cooperrii i integrrii externe n lanul de cooperation and external integration in the
aprovizionare-livrare. Impactul negativ al supply chains.
efectului lovitur de bici scade treptat, The negative impact of the
pe msur ce organizaiile nva s aplice bullwhip effect diminishes gradually as
strategii de marketing relaional i s pun companies learn to apply relationship
bazele unor parteneriate reciproc marketing strategies and build mutually
avantajoase. Membrii lanului de beneficial partnerships. The supply chain
aprovizionare-livrare pot reduce members may reduce information
distorsionarea informaiilor i mbunti distortion and improve profitability only
profitabilitatea numai prin politici by harmonized policies and joined
armonizate i reunirea resurselor. resources.
Nota de final
1
Termenul bullwhip este originar din limba englez. O traducere echivalent n limba
romn ar putea fi lovitur de bici sau lovitur de crava. Aceti termeni pot fi utilizai
pentru capacitatea lor de a sugera variaia mai mare a comenzilor transmise furnizorilor,
comparativ cu variaia cererii la nivelul final al lanului de aprovizionare livrare. Sintagma
lovitur de bici evoc traiectoria sinusoidal a biciului n momentul utilizrii sale i
generarea unui efect semnificativ la captul biciului printr-un efort relativ mic de
manevrare a mnerului acestuia.
References
[1] Blan, C., Logistica: parte integrant a lanului de aprovizionare-livrare, Editura
Uranus, Bucureti, 2006, pp. 312-315.
[2] Burbidge, J.L., The new approach to production, Production Engineer, Vol. 40,
1961, pp. 3-19.
[3] Buzzell, R.D.; Quelch, J.A.; Salmon, W.J., The costly bargain of trade promotions,
Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, March-April 1990, pp. 141-148.
[4] Forrester, J.W., Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1961.
[5] Grnroos, C., From marketing mix to relationship marketing: toward a paradigm
shift in marketing, Management Decisions, Vol. 32, No. 2, 1994, pp. 4-20.
[6] Holstrom, J., Product range management: A case study of supply chain operations
in the European grocery industry, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1997, pp. 107-
115.
[7] Kelly, K., Burned by busy signals: Why Motorola ramped up production way past
demand, Business Week, No. 6, 1995, p. 36.
[8] Kurt Salmon Associates, Efficient Consumer Response: Enhancing Consumer
Value in the Grocery Industry, 1993, Atlanta, GA.
[9] Lee, H.L.; Padmanabhan, V.; Whang S., Information Distortion in a Supply Chain:
The Bullwhip Effect, Management Science, Vol. 43, 1997, pp. 546-558.
[10] Lee, H.L.; Padmanabhan, V.; Whang S., The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains,
Sloan Management Review, Vol. 38, No.3, Spring 1997, pp. 93-102.
[11] Lee, H.L.; So, K.C.; Tang C.S., The value of information sharing in a two-level
supply chain, Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 5, 2000, pp. 626-643.
[12] Metters, R., Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains, Journal of
Operations Management, Columbia, May 1997.
[13] Sellers, P., The dumbest marketing ploy, Fortune, Vol. 126, 1992, pp. 88-93.
[14] Sterman, J.D., Modeling managerial behavior: misperceptions of feedback in a
dynamic decision-making experiment, Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 3, 1989, pp. 321-
329.
40 Amfiteatru Economic