Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Dear All,
As we head into Autumn there is good news and lots to look forward to: the Beanley stone is back, the Scottish Rock Art Project
is well underway, and Heritage Lottery Funding at Durham University could see brand new rock art projects in the North East.
The BRAG Annual Conference will visit a true rock art heartland next year in Ilkley, West Yorkshire, so get your abstracts
submitted and your places booked early!
Kate
October 2017
kesharpe@outlook.com
Contents:
New British discoveries: new finds from Teeside and County Durham ....................................................... 1
British rock art news: NOSAS visit Tiree and possible rock art tools found in Wales .................................. 2
BRAG Conference: call for papers.............................................................................................................. 3
Rock art research at your fingertips....................................................................................................... 3
World rock art on the web: international news and links ........................................................................... 4
The Beanley stone re-discovered: Paul and Barbara Brown ................................................................ 5
Fishy goings on in North Durham: Kate Sharpe, Floor Huisman & Blanca Ochoa .............................. 6
Inspired by rock art: Haute couture cave art ............................................................................................. 8
Safeguarding Rock Art: using a mobile app to get the job done Aron Mazel & Myra Giesen ............ 9
Rock art research in Maastricht: Blanca Ochoa & Kate Sharpe ......................................................... 10
Rock art reads ....................................................................................................................................... 11
Rock art abstracts: headlines from the journals ...................................................................................... 12
Dates for your diary ............................................................................................................................... 13
-1-
Issue No. 18: Autumn 2017
Their trip included a visit to the famous Ringing Stone, a large granite erratic on the west side of the island. John Wombell
explains: The boulder rings when struck with a small cobble and it is carved with about 50 cups of very variable size and shape
on five of its six sides including the north facing side which is singularly unusual. Some cups on the sides of the rock are what I
have described in the past as being like recessed shelves. In other words, they are asymmetric and it would be possible to
perch something small in the cup. There is nothing else quite like it in Britain. The small interpretation board near the site is
very suggestive and quite funny if it wasnt sad in stating that the cups are imprints of breasts!
The Ringing Stone, Tiree. Can you spot the breast impressions? Detail of new cups discovered cups at Fhiorngial. Image by Alan Ross
Thompson (NOSAS)
Belief in the North-East: rock art may feature in big new community project at
Durham University
The first public event of the HLF Belief in the North-East community project took place on
October 1st at Durham University. The Archaeology Department has secured first stage funding
to develop the project which will involve communities across the region in projects related to
belief/ritual/religion across all periods. Local people were invited to attend a day school, and
hear specialists talk about different aspects of the subject, and to feed back their interests, both
geographical and chronological.
Prehistory was well represented with rock art cropped up in several presentations. The day was
well attended and hopefully many of the audience indicated a strong interest in researching cup
and ring marks! You can find out more and register an interest via the project website:
http://www.beliefne.net/
-2-
Issue No. 18: Autumn 2017
Dreams of the Stone Age dated for first time in southern Africa
Stone Age rock paintings in southern Africa have been reliably dated directly for the
first time, revealing that early hunter-gatherers created art at three sites in the
region, some 5,700 years ago. The study focused on paintings in present-day
Botswana, South Africa and Lesotho created by the San people, whose direct
descendants still live in the area. If we are able to date depictions of livestock and
material goods associated with incoming groups, we may be able to start
unravelling the nature of interactions between groups in this early contact, says
David Pearce, an archaeologist and director of the Rock Art Institute at the
University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa, and a co-author of
the latest study. (A. Bonneau et al. Antiquity 91, 322333; 2017).
-4-
Issue No. 18: Autumn 2017
Stan had shown us the site soon after its discovery and we
had taken photographs of the stone which, at the time, lay in
an area of open grassland. Using our archived images, we
noted features in the landscape and triangulated the stones
position. Since 2002, the whole area has become covered in
heather, which made our 2017 search much trickier.
Nevertheless, we managed to relocate the stone in its original
location, completely intact, undisturbed, as buried by the
NADRAP team. In order to photograph the stone, we carefully
removed heather, turf, and soil which, when we finished our
task, was painstakingly reinstated and the stone re-covered.
The stone is embedded in the moor at a downward angle and it appears to have been tightly packed at its edges. It also has
several small stones overlapping it, which suggests that it may have been decorated prior to its placement in a cairn that was
perhaps later robbed. Perhaps it is now time that the Beanley Stone site should be excavated to ascertain its true provenance,
and for its protection under English Heritage/Historic England Schedule.
References
Beckensall, S. 2003. Prehistoric Northumberland. Tempus: Stroud.
Further details of the Beanley Stone can be found on the Englands Rock Art database (ERA ID 1097):
http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/era/section/panel/overview.jsf?eraId=1097
-5-
Issue No. 18: Autumn 2017
Earlier this year, we were alerted to a possible new rock art discovery on a private, residential building site near Edmondsley in
North Durham. Whilst clearing the garden, workers had uncovered a large piece of stone onto which, they reported, had been
carved a fish. Owner, David told us The previous owner was an old man who had lived here since the late 1960s but I don't
think he would have been the type of person who collected or been interested in old stones or archaeology, as the whole place
was overgrown and neglected. Although fish imagery is not typical of the prehistoric repertoire, our curiosity was piqued and
we decided to investigate. We did not anticipate quite how difficult it would be to catch and land our slippery target.
The stone proved to be a rectangular pillar measuring 1 x 0.36 x 0.30 m (Fig 1). It is neatly dressed (using metal tools?) on all
sides except the carved face and that opposite. The decorated surface retains the natural contours, apart from a narrow,
roughly dressed border. The fish has been created by pecking in the manner of prehistoric cup and ring marks (large pecks
were visible in several places) and has a naturalistic appearance closely resembling a salmon or trout with a possible cross
(hook?) extending from its open mouth. A single pecked groove outlines the head, body and tail, with additional lines defining
the head/gills and transecting the length of the body. A rounded hollow forms the open mouth, and the eye seems deepened,
possibly by a boring technique. Two sets of fins are present above and below the body, and further curving grooves are evident
above and below the tail. The sandstone block is crossed by reddish iron banding, parallel to the fish. A photogrammetry model
is now being produced which will allow us to look more closely at 3D features, without the distraction of the surface colouring.
The block, then, seems to have been subject to at least two separate episodes of work: the pecked fish and the later stone
work of the pillar. We concluded that despite the pecking technique, the carving itself was unlikely to be of Neolithic/Bronze Age
origin as fish are not known to be part of the abstract repertoire, and we were too far north for Palaeolithic art such as at
Creswell Crags in Derbyshire (the ice would have covered county Durham) and in any case, the style and technique were not
compatible with cave art. Might it have Roman or Early Medieval origins?
-6-
Issue No. 18: Autumn 2017
We began by consulting experts in Anglo Saxon stonework at Durham University: Dame Professor Rosemary Cramp, Professor
Sarah Semple, and Dr Derek Craig, custodian of the Corpus of Anglo Saxon Stone Sculpture database
(http://www.ascorpus.ac.uk/). Derek suggested we look at a carving from Borthwick Mains near Hawick in Roxburghshire
(http://canmore.org.uk/site/54197; Fig 2).
This fish, measuring 0.94 m from nose to tail, was pecked onto a 1.5 m tall pillar (0.36 x 0.36 m) which once stood in the River
Teviot. Tradition tells that it was captured after a fight between the inhabitants of the two valleys, and it is said to have once
acted as a nilometer: if the tail could be seen above the water it was safe to cross the river. Of a similar size to the Edmondsley
fish, it is formed from a continuous line, with additional lines depicting fins, gills and an eye. The presence of an adipose fin
suggests that it was intended to depict a salmon.
The carving was once thought to be of Pictish origina number of Pictish fish are known from Northern Scotland (eg Fig 2),
and thought to have a pagan Celtic religious significance. They are also all close to salmon rivers, and may be somehow related
to fishing rights. Cessford (1993) argues, however, that its southerly location, the lack of other Pictish symbols on the stone,
and stylistic differences, all indicate that the Borthwick Mains fish is an imitation of later date the 6th or 7th century, although
it may have had a similar role.
Figure 2: Pictish salmon or later imitation? Left and top right: The Borthwick Mains Fish (image: David Petts; interpretation: Cessford
1993); bottom right: Pictish fish from Dunnicaer (Thomson 1860)
By coincidence, Professor Cramp had recently returned from a research trip to France where she had been visiting Merovingian
churches. Amongst the decorated stones she had seen a number of fish images, which she very kindly shared (eg Fig 3). On
seeing photographs of our Edmondsley fish, and hearing the dimensions of the stone, she thought it might be similar, dating to
the 6th or 7th century. She also noted that there is a fish depicted in stone at Hexham Abbey, and dated to the last part of the
7th century (Fig 3).
Figure 3: Early Medieval fish. Left: Merovingian fish from France. Image courtesy of R. Cramp.
Right: fish from south aisle of choir of Hexham Abbey, dated to the last quarter of 7th century.
In July, Professor Sarah Semple paid a visit to the Edmondsley fish. After careful examination she reached the conclusion that
the fish was not an Anglo-Saxon piece. She observed that the stone had at least three phases of working - the fish - pecked
out - and some of the surrounding background pecked out - fins on back and belly could be added later as the pecking is not
apparent on these - they look gouged. Then an arrow is added - it enters across the fish at the mouth and there is a crude
cross at this end and the line traverses the body of the fish. This is not pecked out and is crude and looks like a later addition.
Finally the block has been refaced for use in a building. So I think it comes from somewhere else, and has been altered -
possibly in the Med/early modern period - the damage and this later work makes the piece look crude but actually the fish is
executed quite well in a regular manner.
All our experts had indicated that the carving was definitely old, even though the stone block may have been fashioned more
recently. We next turned our attention to Roman sculpture and especially to the use of fish symbology in early Christian
-7-
Issue No. 18: Autumn 2017
contexts. The use of the fish as an early Christian symbol is well documented (Fig 4). The find site is not too far from the forts
at Chester-le-Street, and at Lanchester and Ebchester and, of course to Dere Street.
Figure 4: Early Christian symbolism. Left: on silver spoon from Trapain Law (410-425 AD), East Lothian.
Middle and right: on grave inscriptions from Rome.
We are fortunate, in the North East, to have access to a number of experts in Roman stones. We showed images of the fish to
Dr David Petts, Senior Lecturer in the Archaeology of Northern England at Durham University and Director of the Binchester
Roman Fort Field School, and to Dr Lindsay Allason-Jones, Reader in Roman Material Culture at Newcastle University. The
response was mixed: David thought our fish unlikely to be of Roman origin or to have Christian associations; Lindsay expressed
an interest in seeing the carving first hand. On a rainy day in October, she joined us on site. After mopping the pooling water
from the grooves, and examining the carving she suggested that it was, indeed, possible that it may have had been a Roman
hand that once decorated the stone, most likely when it was in situ, perhaps in a quarry used by the builders of Dere Street.
Linsay explained that she could find only one fish on a stone sculpture from Britain: a relief of a male figure, identified rather
dodgily as Mars Cocidius, who is holding a shield with a fish motif running up its length. It's privately owned near Gilsland. She
added that Frances Mawer, however, has a number of fish in her catalogue of Christian artefacts in Roman Britain (1995, BAR
Brit Ser. 243) and, whilst a fish is a fish, these do look similar. The Edmondsley carving, she argued, was probably hewn from
the rock in the 18th or 19th century and shaped to create the block, most likely intended to decorate a new building. The current
owner intends to do just this, setting the fish block into a stone garage, where it will safely continue to watch over the world.
So, have we solved the mystery of the carved stone fish? Perhaps not entirely, but we have had an interesting insight into the
ways in which archaeologists dealing with stone carving from different periods approach the problems of authentication and
chronology. Perhaps the photogrammetric model will help us to move the story forwards. Watch this spaceand in the
meantime, if you have any thoughts of your own on the Edmondsley fish, do get in touch!
Cessford, C (1993) The Borthwick Mains Salmon, Hawick Archaeological Society Transactions, 269.
Mawer, CF (1995) Evidence for Christianity in Roman Britain. The small-finds. BAR British Series 243.
Thomson, A (1860) Notice of sculptured stones found at Dinnacair, a rock in the sea, near Stonehaven, Proceedings of the
Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, 3: 6975.
According to LMVH, Guided by this inspiration and the idea of a wild and ancient femininity, Maria Grazia Chiuri infuses the
collection with shamanic intuition that celebrates instinctive spirit.
-8-
Issue No. 18: Autumn 2017
Safeguarding Rock Art: using a mobile app to get the job done
Aron Mazel & Myra Giesen
Open-air rock art panels form an iconic component of the UK and Ireland's archaeological heritage. This valuable resource is,
however, under threat from increasing population densities and agricultural intensity, along with climate change, and is
deteriorating. Threats include being scratched by livestock (Fig 1), dumped on the sides of fields, and driven on.
People in the UK and Ireland now have an opportunity to contribute to the safeguarding of ancient open-air rock art by
providing information about the condition of motifs and panels using a dedicated mobile app. Until now, condition assessments
and risk evaluations of rock art has been a paper-based exercise. Newcastle University researchers and software developers
have joined forces to convert a paper-based monitoring form into the first ever bespoke app that can be used in the countryside
to monitor threats to rock artanimal and humanas well as the condition of the motifs (Fig 2).
The initial paper-based monitoring form was developed with the help of the public, who provided feedback on how best to
represent some of the criteria that we wanted to capture on the forms (Fig 3). The app is downloadable free from Google Play
(Android) or Apple iTunes (iOS), searching on CARE Rock Art (see also https://rockartcare.ncl.ac.uk/). Completing the app form is
not a lengthy processtiming will differ between peoplebut it should not take longer than 5 to 10 minutes (Fig 4). An
extensive Help menu is available on the app to support completion of reports. It is okay to complete reports in areas without
the internet, as records are queued for later uploading.
Figure 3: Developing the form Figure 4: Using the app in the field
After uploading reports, it is possible to use the web portal to review and modify individual reports. It is not, however, possible
to see reports completed by other people. Once uploaded, reports are made available, via the portal, to the CARE project team,
custodians of the rock art (if known), heritage agencies, and heritage officials in the counties in which the panel is located.
A paper-based form can also be completed in the field and the information later entered electronically on the web portal using
the Create Report tab and submitted as a new report, along with two images (required for the report to be accepted). The web
portal has a downloadable pdf form to support completing a paper-based form in the countryside.
By completing a report on the CARE app or on the CARE Portal, users contribute to the scoring system that calculates a panels
overall CARE status. A scorecard has also been developed, where risks are weighted against different criteria to establish the
extent of the risk; panels are categorised as being at serious risk (red), at risk (amber), or not at risk (green). Managemen t
guidance specific to the information provided in the reports and scorecards is also provided on the CARE portal. It is
recommended, however, that any management interventions by the landowner and/or manager should be done in consultation
with local authority archaeologists/heritage officers/appropriate bodies that support the conservation of rock art in the
countryside.
The app was produced as part of the Heritage and Science: Working Together in the CARE of Rock Art project whose purpose
was to undertake research into the factors that threaten open-air rock art and to develop materials that aid in its safeguarding.
The CARE project is a collaboration between heritage and science research interests at Newcastle University (Myra Giesen,
David Graham, Peter Lewis, and Aron Mazel) and Queen's University Belfast (Patricia Warke). The app was developed by Mark
Turner and Stephen Dowsland (Newcastle University and Labyrinth Web Design). The Arts and Humanities Research Council
and Newcastle University provided funding.
-9-
Issue No. 18: Autumn 2017
Rock art research in Maastricht: a review of the European Archaeologist Association Conference 2017
Blanca Ochoa & Kate Sharpe
This years EAA meeting was held in ethnographic context can be used to interest in the rock art (Spanish and
the Dutch city of Maastricht, at the interpret depictions in rock art by Chile) and those that have maintained
heart of Europe, with themes analysing the current use of some a connection throughout time but are
including approaches and problems objects found in the material culture beginning to lose it (Australia). In all
that have entertained archaeologists of the hunter-gatherers in Africa cases the speakers explored the tools
for several decades: the technical (musical bows by Oliver Vogels) and that researchers have applied to
revolutions and the multidisciplinary Australia (baskets by Emily Miller) and engage present communities in the
approach, the management of 2) the relations between material recording of the rock art and its
heritage in the current political culture and the depictions of a specific touristic development within the
climate, and the interpretation of chronology: Marta Diaz-Guardamino margins of research.
archaeological data. The programme regarding the warrior stelae and
included no fewer than four sessions funerary assemblages in Bronze Age The final session dedicated to rock art
in which rock art was the main Iberia; Ekaterina Devlet about arctic was organised by George Nash and
subject; each of them touched on one whale hunters equipment in rock art May-Tove Smiseth. Looking beyond
or several of the general themes. This representations, and Joakhim the intervention of the artist.
was a significant advance from the Goldhahn debunking traditional Choice and preparation in rock
previous year in which there was only interpretations by analysing rock art art sites focused on the location,
one session focussing on rock art. through the material culture. specific placement and the
With research interests in Spanish relationship between the surface or
Palaeolithic cave art and canvas and the rock art. As with the
Neolithic/Bronze Age British other rock art sessions in the
petroglyphs respectively, we were conference, the presentations
each hoping to hear some inspiring spanned wide chronologies and
presentations. geographies, from Nordic latitudes to
Peru. The use of new techniques was
Rock Art Research is evident with photogrammetry, RTI, 3D
Archaeology or it is nothing was imaging applied to investigate the
organised by Marina Gallinaro and placement of the depictions (Nathalie
Ins Domingo. Over a full morning, Brusgaard, Ekaterina Devlet,
twelve papers explored new Alexander Pakhunov). Other
perspectives developed using interesting approaches relied on more
archaeological methods to obtain traditional archaeological methods to
results with the potential to bring us understand the choices and
closer to the societies that created the relationships between the art and its
rock art. Researchers discussed the surrounding landscape (Courtney
fine line between managing heritage, Nimura, George Nash, Joakim
preserving the rock art and scientific Baskets carried by Australian Goldhahn). Sadly, the short time slot
study (Ins Domingo), new Bradshaw figures scheduled for the session, and its
methodologies (Andrea Jalandoni and timing just prior to the Annual EAA
Blanca Ochoa), new approaches to old The session Mind the Gap 2.0: meeting, precluded any questions to
problems (Joana Valdez, Marta Diaz- Building bridges between science, the presenters or discussion of the
Guardamino, Eymard Fader, Oliver heritage and society in the topics raised at least until later over
Vogels), and introduced some new archaeology of rock art, organised a drink
and interesting research questions by Ins Domingo and Marina
(Margarita Daz-Andreu). Gallinaro, was short but sweet. Its
main purpose was the conciliation
Organised by Joakim Goldhahn and between research, politics and the
Sally May, The materiality of rock engagement with the societies that
art: insights into relationships currently live around the rock art.
between people, place and object With perspectives from Australia (Paul
in world rock art delved deeper Taon), Spain (Ins Domingo), Chile
into the study of the objects related to (Rosario Cordero) and Africa (Marina
rock art rather than the rock art itself. Gallinaro) we saw different
This approach is not new but has approaches from around the world. All
been somewhat neglected by rock art the speakers remarked on the
researchers until the last decade. After importance of the interaction between
a general historiographical local communities and rock art, both
introduction by the organiser, the to protect it and to develop it. Two
presentations covered two main very different perspectives were
general questions: 1) how the presented: communities with no
- 10 -
Issue No. 18: Autumn 2017
- 11 -
Issue No. 18: Autumn 2017
Exploring a unique rock art Ethnography of rock art in China 3D imaging in NW Spain
heritage in South America Understanding the values that uphold Photogrammetry and digital image
The authors argue that the rock art the Zhuang peoples emotional enhancement in combination with
and its location show a clear causality attachment to the Huashan rock art image enhancement tools are used to
and intentionality to select the panel, area and the inuence of tourism on improve visualisation and analysis of
the subject matter and the audience those values is contributing to greater degradation by delamination and
(and their possible participation). understanding of the challenges of water runoff.
Nash, G. & A. Troncoso. 2016.The heritage tourism. Fernndez-Lozanoa, J. at al. 2017.
socio-ritual organisation of the upper Gao, Q. 2017. Social values and rock 3D digital documentation and image
Limar Valley: two rock art traditions, art tourism: an ethnographic study of enhancement integration into
one landscape. Journal of Arid the Huashan rock art area (China). schematic rock art analysis and
Environments;http://dx.doi.org/10.101 Conservation and Management of preservation: The Castrocontrigo
6/j.jaridenv.2016.11.014 Archaeological Sites 19 (1): 82-95. Neolithic rock art (NW Spain) Journal
of Cultural Heritage 26: 1606.
Palm measurements predict sex Rock art depicts social change in Stylistic analysis of arid zone
Geometric morphometric techniques northern Chile rock art in Australia
were used to assess the sex of the Analysis of rock art scenes at six sites This paper tests two style provinces
makers of hand stencils. Sex was suggests increasing focus on the in the Australian Western Desert,
correctly predicted in over 90% of the control and protection of camelids finding support for a phased art
sample. The form of the palm is despite no archaeological evidence sequence accompanying the first
particularly sexually dimorphic. for domestication in the region. peopling of Australias arid zones, and
Nelson, E. et al. 2017. Beyond size: Dudognon, C. & M. Seplveda. 2017 evidence for earlier configurations of
The potential of a geometric (in press). Rock art of the upper Lluta arid-zone social networks.
morphometric analysis of shape and valley, northernmost of Chile (South McDonald, J. 2017. Discontinuities
form for the assessment of sex in hand Central Andes): A visual approach to in arid zone rock art: Graphic
stencils in rock art. Journal of socio-economic changes between indicators for changing social
Archaeological Science 78: 20213. Archaic and Formative periods complexity across space and through
(6,0001,500 years BP). Quaternary time. Journal of Anthropological
International. Archaeology 46: 5367.
Acoustics and rock art. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Express Letters (JASA-EL) recently published four abstracts
exploring relationships between rock art and the acoustic properties of their locations.
Daz-Andreu, M. & T. Fazenda, B. M. 2017. Lubman, D. 2017. Did Rainio, R. et al. 2017.
Mattioli. 2017. Rock art Were Palaeolithic cave Palaeolithic cave artists Acoustic measurements at
and prehistoric sound- paintings placed because intentionally paint at the sacred sites in Finland
scapes: Some results from of acoustic resonances? resonant cave locations? JASA-EL 141, 4000;
Italy, France, and Spain. JASA-EL 141, 3999; JASA-EL 141, 3999; http://doi.org.ezphost.dur.
JASA-EL 141, 3999; http://doi.org.ezphost.dur. http://doi.org.ezphost.dur.a ac.uk/10.1121/1.4989170
http://doi.org.ezphost.dur ac.uk/10.1121/1.4989167 c.uk/10.1121/1.4989168
.ac.uk/10.1121/1.4989166
- 12 -
Issue No. 18: Autumn 2017
9th 10th June 2018 British Rock Art Group Annual Conference
Ilkley, West Yorkshire
Theme: Rock art in the landscape
Call for papers. Please contact: aron.mazel@newcastle.ca.uk or george.h.nash@hotmail.com
29th Aug 2nd Sep 2018 20th International Rock Art Congress IFRAO 2018
Valcamonica, Italy
Deadline for papers: 30th November 2017
Theme: Standing on the shoulders of giants
See website for sessions: www.ccsp.it/web/Ifrao2018/IFRAO2018_eng.html
If you would like to submit an article to Rock Articles please contact me at kesharpe@outlook.com.
Feature articles. Contributions are invited for articles on all aspects of Rock Art in Britain and Ireland, including recording
techniques, interpretation, management, presentation, education, and conservation. We are keen to hear about any community
projects, heritage initiatives, new techniques, new research, and to provide a forum for anyone with an interest in rock art.
Perhaps you have been to a conference and could write a report, or have participated in a workshop or training event? Articles
should be 750-1000 words, and should include at least two images (for which you should have permission).
New Discoveries. If you have identified any new rock art and would like to feature your find in the New Discoveries section of
Rock Articles, get in touch, with a photograph of your find. Please note that grid references will not be included in Rock Articles.
Finds should be reported to and verified by the relevant local authority HER officer.
British Rock Art News. Do you have some news about your project, or an update on a particular panel that you can fit into
less than 200 words? Why not share it RA readers?
Inspired by Rock Art? Rock art often inspires creative responses. Have cup and ring marks fired your imagination? If so wed
love to see your work!
Events and opportunities. Are you running an event that might be of interest to RA readers? Let us know about any talks,
conferences, or guided walks. Maybe you are looking for participants for a community project? Advertise here and use the RA
network to spread the word.
Submission deadline for Rock Articles No. 19: 16th March 2018
- 13 -