Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Sheng Guo
Department of Economics
Florida International University
Empirical analysis:
1 estimate MPC, ,
from ci = + yi + i ;
2 compute APC = yc ;
Later contradictions:
1 Kuznets found no rise in s/y during 1900-1950s, despite y .
2 APC roughly the same, but MPC differs from different cross-section
household studies.
4 Inequality of income , even though MPC < 1 implies the rich getting richer,
the poor getting poorer.
Despite this, the testable implications from PIH are profound and
stimulated hundreds of papers.
cp = k (r, , u)yp
Even after all feasible adjustments, one still cannot obtain a perfect
measure corresponding to theoretical concepts.
yit includes all other effects that makes yi deviate from yip : accidental
effects, cyclical fluctuations, measurement error, etc.
Restriction One:
3 Overtime work;
Friedman agreed that (4) may not be absolutely correct, but it may be a
close approximation of reality and is helpful for generating refutable
predictions.
Restriction Two:
y t = E(yit ) = c t = E(cit ) = 0 (5)
Assume k () is identical among the individual observations (individual
homogeneity assumption), then
cip = kyip c p = k y p c = k y
because of (5).
Therefore we can compute that
k = c/y (6)
ci = + yi + i (7)
p p
Cov(ci , yi ) Cov(ci + ci , yi + yi )
t t
= =
Var(yi ) Var(yi )
Cov(cip , yip ) + Cov(cip , yit ) + Cov(cit , yip ) + Cov(cit , yit )
=
Var(yi )
Cov(cip , yip ) Cov(kyip , yip )
= =
Var(yi ) Var(yi )
k Var(yip )
= k Py
Var(yi )
Recall that c
y
= k . We can show < k graphically (The famous graph).
d c/c
The elasticity of consumption to income cy = d y/y
APC 0.90, for different periods and countries; MPC 0.67 0.79
(differ mainly between farm and non-farm units) (Table 1).
From (Py ) and variance (std. dev.) of yi , we can back out the variance
(std. dev.) of yip and yit (Table 4).
DeJuan and Seater (2006) is a test of the original Friedman model using
modern data (Consumer Expenditure Survey).
c
One assumption they make is k = y
= 1 (see previous evidence from
Friedman (1957)).
This is the result solely derived from the relationship between measured
consumption and income.
For example, consider the mean assumption of the growth of income for
a group of households (1, 2 index adjacent periods):
yi2p yi1p y 2 y 1
=
yi2p y2
which implies
y1
yi1p = yi2p , . (9)
y2
cy,g = 0 + 1 y1 y2 ,g + g , (11)
0.5 o0.5
0.45 0.4
0
0.5 O -
0.5
l 0.64.
S0.4 0.0.4 0.4
0.3
0.3 * 0.2
0.1*
0.2 0
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Elasinc Elasinc
S*0.5
0.5 *
0.4 0.4
* * 0.3
0.3- 0.2
0.4 0.5Sheng 0.7 FIU
0.6 Guo, 0.9
0.8Econ 1 Eco7207
0.3PIH:
0.4 The 0.6
0.5 Origin 0.7 0.8 0.9