Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Abstract: The SPV electricity generation employs various cell technologies namely polycrystalline, mono crystalline, amorphous, CIGS cells.
To evaluate the performance of SPV plant a mathematical model was generated base on empirical relations and performance was calculated
under various conditions. The electrical output was calculated based on various parameters such as tilt angle, cell technology, radiation levels.
Sensitivity analysis was also carried out at five different geographical locations namely New Delhi, Ladhak, Jodhpur Mumbai, and Bangalore.
The result shows that electrical output is maximum for polycrystalline cell at a give location and at tilt angle of plus minus 50 of location.
Jodhpur was found to be the best geographical local followed by New Delhi.
Keywords: Solar photovoltaic system, Tilt angles, amorphous, mono crystalline, polycrystalline, Sensitivity analysis.
__________________________________________________*****_________________________________________________
Electrical o/p(kwh/yr)
160000 4,M
140000 4,P
120000 5,A
100000 5,M
80000 5,P
60000 6,A
40000 6,M
15 25 Tilt Angle 35 45
Figure 1. Effect of tilt angle, type of cell and radiation level on electrical output (kWh/year) for location with =280.
3.2 Effect of tilt angle & others at location =18 Hg of 4, 5, 6 kWh/m2/day, at various tilt angles at
Results were investigated for effect of variation on location =18. This is shown in consolidated form in
electrical output for different types of cells, at different Figure 2
tilt angle of module and at different radiation levels of
180000
160000
4,A
4,M
Electrical p/p(kwh/yr)
140000
4,P
120000
5,A
100000 5,M
5,P
80000
6,A
60000 6,M
6,P
40000
15 25 35 45
Tilt Angle
Figure 2: Effect of tilt angle, type of cell and radiation level on electrical output(kWh/year) for =180.
3.3 Effect of tilt angle & others at location =12 Hg of 4, 5, 6 kWh/m2/day, with respect to tilt angle at
Results were obtained showing variation of electrical location =12. This is shown in consolidated form in
output for different types of cells, and radiation level Figure 3.
1503
IJRITCC | June 2017, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 5 Issue: 6 1502 1506
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
180000
160000 4,A
Electrical o/p(kwh/yr)
140000 4,M
4,P
120000
5,A
100000 5,M
80000 5,P
6,A
60000
6,M
40000 6,P
15 25 35 45
Tilt Angle
Figure 3: Effect of tilt angle, type of cell and radiation level on electrical output(kWh/year) for =120.
3.4 Effect of tilt angle & others at location =34 Hg of 4, 5, 6 kWh/m2/day, with respect to tilt angle at
Results were obtained showing variation of electrical location =34. This is shown in consolidated form in
output for different types of cells, and radiation level Figure 4.
200000
180000
4,A
160000
Electrical o/p(kwh/yr)
4,M
140000 4,P
120000 5,A
5,M
100000
5,P
80000
6,A
60000 6,M
40000 6,P
15 25 35 45
Tilt Angle
Figure 4: Effect of tilt angle, type of cell and radiation level on electrical output(kWh/year) for =340.
3.5 Effect of tilt angle & others at location =26 Hg of 4, 5, 6 kWh/m2/day, with respect to tilt angle at
Results were obtained showing variation of electrical location =26. This is shown in consolidated form in
output for different types of cells, and radiation level Figure 5 .
1504
IJRITCC | June 2017, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 5 Issue: 6 1502 1506
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
200000
180000 4,A
4,M
160000
Electrical o/p(kwh)
4,P
140000
5,A
120000
5,M
100000
5,P
80000 6,A
60000 6,M
40000 6,P
15 25 Tilt Angle 35 45
Figure 5: Effect of tilt angle, type of cell and radiation level on electrical output (kWh/year) for =260.
Table 1: Results generated for maximum electrical output (kWh/year) for amorphous cell at different
locations(), tilt angle, and different radiation level.
Cell Type Electrical Output Electrical Output Electrical Output
(Hg=4) (Hg=5) (Hg=6)
28 35 59990 75896 91802
Amorphous
Table 2: Results generated for maximum electrical output (kWh/year) for monocrystalline cell at different
locations(), tilt angle, and different radiation level.
Cell Type Electrical Output Electrical Output Electrical Output
(Hg=4) (Hg=5) (Hg=6)
28 35 91700 116013 140327
Monocrystalline
Table 3: Results generated for maximum electrical output (kWh/year) for polycrystalline cell at different
locations(), tilt angle, and different radiation level.
Cell Type Electrical Output Electrical Output Electrical Output
(Hg=4) (Hg=5) (Hg=6)
28 35 117410 148541 179671
Polycrysta
1505
IJRITCC | June 2017, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 5 Issue: 6 1502 1506
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
26 25 114999 145253 175561