Eugenics and Education by Ann Winfeild « Bill Ayers http://billayers.wordpress.

com/2008/07/03/eugenics-and-education-by-ann-winfeild/

Home
Biography/History
Talks/Events
Teaching
Videos
Writings

Eugenics and Education by Ann Winfeild

As finite beings in an infinite and expanding universe, our understanding of the world is necessarily contingent, partial, and
incomplete, and yet we live for the most part as if our everyday assumptions, biases, myths, and common sense are simply and
entirelytrue. To say that we are—each and all of us—blind to our own blind-spots is a tautology. To take that tautology as a
provocation, as a point of departure toward upending our own orthodoxy requires curiosity and courage. Ann Winfield has an
abundance of both—a lively and exquisite mind combined with a willingness to relentlessly poke around in the dark. The result is a
work of power and importance—breath-taking in its reach and surprising on almost every page. Here she interrogates—through the
lens of a movement and an ideology that dominated our culture for much of the twentieth century—the story of democracy, freedom,
and exalted forward progress that we Americans love to tell ourselves. Written out of the official story as quackery and the handiwork
of a few nut-cases, Winfield demonstrates beyond doubt that eugenics was not only respectable, mainstream science but also that its
major tenets were well-springs in the formation of American public schools with echoes in the every day practices of today. Formed
in the crucible of white supremacy and rigid hierarchies of human value, American schools have never adequately faced that living
heritage.

We no longer talk of “miscegenation” or “imbeciles,” of course, and we are likely to look upon forced sterilization and race-based
marriage laws as archaic. But Winfield undermines any sense of smug superiority we might grant ourselves by drawing a direct line
from those repulsive labels and practices to our own obsessions with “standards” and “accountability,” test scores and grades. White
supremacy surely changes its spots but it remains durable and dominant.

Education, of course, is never entirely neutral—it always has a value, a position, a politics. Education—teaching and schooling
—either reinforces or challenges the existing social order. For humanists and democratic educators, the largest, most generous
purpose of education is always human enlightenment and human liberation, and the driving principle is the unity of all humanity. We
embrace the conviction that every human being is of incalculable value, entitled to decent standards concerning freedom and justice
and education, and that any violations, deliberate or inadvertent, must be fought against, testified to, and resisted.

The unity of human beings is based both upon a recognition of differences as well as a consciousness of our interdependence. People
are different—distinct capacities, unique needs—and we are, at the same time, entirely connected. In today’s world, where we seem to
know the price of everything and the value of nothing, the knowledge we lack includes an acknowledgment of the reality of our wild
diversity—something that just is—and at the same time an acceptance of our deep connectedness. The knowledge we desperately
need now is a knowledge based upon recognition, upon unity and solidarity.

The relationship between education and freedom is deep, intrinsic, and profound—they are essentially the same thing. Both concern
themselves with the fullest expression of human development. To the extent that people reflect upon their lives and become more
conscious of themselves as actors in the world, they insert themselves as subjects in history, constructors of the human world, and
they enact and express themselves, then, as free human beings.

The aim of humanistic educators is to organize schools in such a way that every member can develop and use all of his or her
capacities and powers without infringing upon the basic conditions or rights of others. The classroom becomes an association in
which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all.

To be a good teacher in this context means above all to have an abiding faith in all students, to believe in the possibility that every
person can create things and is capable of both individual and social transformation. Education becomes a form of reinventing,
re-creating, and rewriting, and this is a task that can be accomplished only by free subjects, never by inert objects. Education, then, is
a dialogical process in which everyone participates actively as equals—a turbulent, raucous, unpredictable and participatory affair.
The goal of dialogue in this context is critical thinking and action—knowledge emerges from the continual interaction of reflection

1 of 3 05/01/10 5:56 PM
Eugenics and Education by Ann Winfeild « Bill Ayers http://billayers.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/eugenics-and-education-by-ann-winfeild/

and action.

In democratic schools, an emphasis on the needs and interests of the student is co-primary with faith in a kind of robust public that
can be created in classrooms, as well as in the larger society. To be exclusively child-centered, to the extent that the needs of the group
are ignored or erased, is to develop a kind of fatalistic narcissism; to honor the group while ignoring the needs of the individual is to
destroy any possibility of freedom. This is the meaning of community, the creation of places where people are held together because
they are working along common lines in a common spirit with common aims. These are places of energy and excitement, unlike the
sites of coercion and containment that are all-too-familiar in schools: the difference is motive, spirit, and atmosphere. These qualities
are found when people move from being passive recipients to choosing themselves as authors, actors, builders, and makers within a
social surround.

When the aim of education is the absorption of facts, learning becomes exclusively and exhaustively selfish, and there is no obvious
social motive for learning. The measure of success is always a competitive one—it is about comparing results and sorting people into
winners and losers. People are turned against one another, and every difference becomes a potential deficit. Getting ahead of others is
the primary goal in such places, and mutual assistance, which can be so natural, is severely restricted or banned. On the other hand,
where active work is the order of the day, helping others is not a form of charity, something that impoverishes both recipient and
benefactor. Rather a spirit of open communication, interchange and analysis becomes a commonplace. Of course in these places there
is a certain natural disorder, a certain amount of anarchy and chaos as there is in any busy workshop. But there is a deeper discipline,
the discipline of getting things done and learning through life, and there is an appreciation of knowledge as an inherently public
good—something that can be reproduced at little or no cost, and (unlike commodities), when it’s given away, no one has any less of
it. In a rational society, knowledge would be shared without any reservation or restriction whatsoever.

Schools serve societies—in many ways all schools are microcosms of the societies in which they’re embedded—and they are both
mirror and window onto the social reality. If one understands the schools, one can see the whole of society; if one fully grasps the
intricacies of society, one will know something true about the schools. In a totalitarian society, for example, schools would be built for
obedience and conformity; in a kingdom, the schools would teach fealty. But in an authentic democracy we would expect to find
schools defined by a spirit of cooperation, inclusion, and full participation, places that honor diversity while building unity. Schools in
a democracy would resist the over-specialization of human activity—the separation of the intellectual from the manual, the head from
the hand, the heart and the head, the creative and the functional—as a distortion. The goal of democratic schools would be the fluidity
of function, the variation of work and capacity, the mobilization of intelligence and creativity and initiative and work in all directions.

The education we are used to is only a caricature—it is not authentically or primarily about full human development. Why, for
example, is education thought of as only kindergarten through 12th grade, or kindergarten through university? Why does education
occur only early in life? Why is there a point in our lives when we feel we no longer need education? Why again, is there a hierarchy
of teacher over student? Why are there grades and grade levels? Why is there attendance? Why is being on time so valuable? Why
indeed do we think of a productive and a service sector in our society, with education designated a service activity? Why is education
separate from production?

Eugenics and Education will change the way you think about curriculum and teaching, school reform, educational policy and
practice, and even the current debates concerning immigration and marriage. This is essential reading for anyone who hopes to
understand the sorry state of our schools today, and the deep changes we must undertake to improve them. After seeing the world
through Ann Winfield’s eyes, when you hear the terms “gifted and talented” or “at risk” you’re likely to wince. Good.

This entry was posted on Thursday, July 3rd, 2008 at 11:17 pm and is filed under Book Reviews. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0
feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Recent Posts
Inauguration 1-20-09
COMIX NATION
Arundhati Roy says:
New Year’s Resolution…2009…miracle and wonder
Vote “Me” for Secretary of Education

a
Select Category

Blogroll

2 of 3 05/01/10 5:56 PM
Eugenics and Education by Ann Winfeild « Bill Ayers http://billayers.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/eugenics-and-education-by-ann-winfeild/

Education Policy Research Unit

Gerald Bracey
Maxine Greene Foundation
Mike Klonsky’s Small Talk
Museum of Education
Peter McLaren
The Other Eye

Archives
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006

Theme Contempt by Vault9.

Blog at WordPress.com.

3 of 3 05/01/10 5:56 PM