Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CHAPTER 6
Management Functions
Leading
Planning Decision
Making
Organizing
Controlling
LEGAL FORMS|DEFINITION|KEY ACTIVITIES
NATURE OF
ORGANIZING
LEGAL FORMS OF
ORGANIZATION
SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP
Is a business owned and operated by one person.
ADVANTAGES:
Simple to organize and shut down
Few legal restrictions
Owner is free to make all decisions
Profit is taxed only once
DISADVANTAGES:
Owner takes responsibility for all the liability
Difficult to raise capital
Duration of the business is limited to the life of the proprietor
PARTNERSHIP
is an association of two or more partners to carry on as
co-workers of a business for profit.
ADVANTAGES:
Almost easy to organize
Few legal restrictions
Permit pooling the managerial skills and judgments and the
financial strengths of several people who have interest in the
enterprise
Does not pay taxes
Shared responsibilities on liabilities
DISADVANTAGES:
Divided decision-making authority
Potential damage to the business when partners disagree
Death of one partner means death of partnership
Permit pooling the managerial skills and judgments and
the financial strengths of several people who have
interest in the enterprise- Downside: divided decision-
making authority and potential damage to the business
when partners disagree
ADVANTAGES:
Have perpetual life
Easier to raise money, transfer ownership, and change
management
DISADVANTAGES:
Income is taxed twice: Corporation income tax and
personal income tax
Subject to many state and federal controls
COOPERATIVES
Are a special type of
organization owned by users or
customers, to whom earnings
are usually distributed tax-free
in proportion to patronage.
Organizing
-To create
structures
Leading Controlling
- To inspire -To ensure
effort results
ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURE
System of tasks, reporting relationships, and communication linkages
that link together the work of diverse individuals and groups
FORMAL STRUCTURES
Official structure of the organization
ORGANIZATION CHART
Diagrams reporting relationships and the
arrangement of work positions within an
organization
Reflects the basics of an organizations
formal structure
1. Division of Work
2. Supervisory Relationships
3. Communication Channels
4. Major Subunits
5. Levels of Management
INFORMAL
STRUCTURES
Behind every formal structure lies
an informal structure
WORK PROCESS
Group of related tasks that collectively creates something of
value to a customer
DIVISIONAL
STRUCTURE
ADVANTAGES:
More flexibility in responding to environmental changes
Improved coordination across functional departments
Clear points of responsibility for product or service delivery
Expertise focused on specific customers, products, and regions
Greater ease in changing size by adding or deleting divisions
DISADVANTAGES:
Increase costs through the duplication of resources and efforts across
divisions
Create unhealthy rivalries as divisions compete for resources and top
management attention
MATRIX STRUCTURE
Matrix Organization
Combines the functional and divisional structures
Gain the advantages and minimize the disadvantages of each
Creating permanent teams that cut across functions to support
specific products, program and project team.
Report to two bosses- one within the function and the other
within the team.
MATRIX STRUCTURE
MATRIX STRUCTURE
ADVANTAGES:
Better communication and cooperation across functions
Improved decision making; problem solving takes place at the team
level where the best information is available
Increased flexibility in adding, removing or changing operations to
meet changing demands
Better customer service; there is always a program, product or
project manager informed and available to answer questions
Better performance accountability through the program, product or
project managers
Improved strategic management; top managers are freed from
problem-solving to focus time on more strategic issues
MATRIX STRUCTURE
DISADVANTAGES:
Two-boss system
Team meetings in the matrix can take a lot of time, and the
teams may develop groupitis
Requirement of adding the team leaders to a matrix structure
can also result in higher costs
TEAM STRUCTURES
Uses permanent and temporary cross-functional teams to improve
lateral relations
CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAMS
Brings together members from different functional departments
TEAM STRUCTURES |NETWORK
STRUCTURES|BOUNDARILESS STRUCTURES
HORIZONTAL
ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURE
TEAM STRUCTURES
ADVANTAGES
Breaks down barriers and mobilizes talents
Improve performance by increasing the speed and quality of
decisions in many situations
Boost morale
Experience a greater sense of task involvement and
identification and this increases their enthusiasm for the job
DISADVANTAGES:
Conflicting loyalties for persons with both team and functional
assignments
Issues of time management and group process
NETWORK
STRUCTURES
Have a central core of full-time employees surrounded by
networks of outside contractors and partners that supply
essential services
Uses information technologies to link with networks of outside
suppliers and service contractors
Employs a minimum staff and contracts out as much work as
possible
NETWORK
STRUCTURES
NETWORK
STRUCTURES
STRATEGIC ALLIANCES
- Cooperation agreements with other firms to pursue business
activities of mutual interest.
DISADVANTAGES:
The more complex the business, the more complicated it is to
control and coordinate the network of contracts and alliances
If one part of the network breaks down or fail to deliver, the
entire system suffers.
Lack of loyalty among contractors who are used infrequently
rather than on a long-term basis
BOUNDARYLESS
STRUCTURES
Eliminates internal boundaries among subsystems and external
boundaries with the external environment
BOUNDARYLESS
STRUCTURES
VIRTUAL ORGANIZATION
-Uses IT and the internet to engage a shifting network of strategic
alliances
-Calls an alliance into action to meet specific needs and objectives; when
the work is complete, the alliance rests until the next called into action
ORGANIZATIONAL
DESIGNS
CONTINGENCY | MECHANISTIC & ORGANIC
|TRENDS
ORGANIZATIONAL
DESIGNS
Process of choosing and
implementing structures to
accomplish the
organizations mission and
objectives
CONTINGENCY IN
ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN
BUREAUCRACY
Form of organization based on logic, order, and the legitimate
use of formal authority
Vertical structure
Clear-cut division of labor, strict hierarchy of authority, formal
rules and procedures, and promotion based on competency
Use Mechanistic Design
ORGANIZATIONAL
DESIGN ALTERNATIVES
TRENDS IN ORGANIZATIONAL
DESIGN
1.Fewer levels of management
2.More delegation and empowerment
3.Decentralization and Centralization
4.Reduced Use of Staff
FEWER LEVELS OF
MANAGEMENT
CHAIN OF COMMAND
-Links all persons with successively higher levels of authority
SPAN OF CONTROL
- Number of persons directly reporting to a manager
Tall Structures
- Have narrow spans of control and many hierarchical levels
Flat Structures
- Have wide spans of control and few hierarchical levels
FEWER LEVELS OF
MANAGEMENT
MORE DELEGATION
AND EMPOWERMENT
DELEGATION
-Process of distributing and entrusting work to other persons
EMPOWERMENT
- Allows others to make decisions and exercise discretion in their
work
DECENTRALIZATION AND
CENTRALIZATION
CENTRALIZATION
-Concentration of authority for most decisions at the top level of
an organization
DECENTRALIZATION
- Dispersion of authority to make decisions throughout all
organization levels
REDUCED USE OF
STAFF
LINE FUNCTIONS
-Accomplished the main mission or objectives of the organization
-Production, Sales and Finance
STAFF FUNCTIONS
-Provide technical expertise for other parts of the organization
-Helped the line accomplish these objectives by providing some
sort of advice or service
-Personnel, Procurement, Legal Counsel, and Market Research