Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Negative
Top Shelf
1NC
Desegregation is a nice word for assimilation they try and mold the
black body into the perfect black citizen that acts white, seems
white, and feels white
Tommy J. Curry 15, Ph.D., Philosophy, Southern Illinois University, Back to the
Woodshop: Black Education, Imperial Pedagogy, and Post-Racial Mythology
Under the Reign of Obama,
https://www.academia.edu/8212290/Back_to_the_Woodshop_Black_Education_I
mperial_Pedagogy_and_Post-Racial_Mythology_under_the_Reign_of_Obama
For centuries, European thinkers, and their contemporary white followers, have run rampant in the halls of academia
prematurely championing the success of liberalism to speak to the experience of those historical groups of people
excluded from modernity, while simultaneously celebrating the universal embrace by the supple bosom of whites
anthropologically specific ideas of reason and humanity. In the United States, this philosophical impetus has solidi ed the
political regime of integration as not only the most desirable but also most realizable condition of Black (co)existence.
Following this course of events, the education of African-descended people has been
collapsed into a single ideological goal, namely how to mold Blacks into more functional and
productive members of American society under the idea of equality established by Brown v.
Board of Education. Unfortunately, however, such a commitment elevates the ethical
appeals made by Brown, which focused on higher ideals of reason and humanity found
in liberal political thought and the eventual transcendence of racial identity to moral
code. Following the election of Barack Hussein Obama, a new post-racial morality ushered in to tout the success of
integration in eliminating American racism. Under this regime, the education of Black people becomes a decidedly norma-
tive endeavor in which institutions of learning compel Black people to base their consciousness toward the world and
toward the continuing oppression of Blacks and other darker races around the world through militarism and sanctions
around how Black people should act and what Blacks ought to be if they wish to be recognized as true Americans. This
morality, instead of attending to what Blacks should learn or the knowledge Blacks need
to have in order to thrive as Blacks in America, condemns racial consciousness; it
forces/demands Blacks to conduct them- selves (politically, culturally, socially) with the
aim of being recognized as good Negro citizens. Ultimately, post-racialism is a creation
of the white imagination, a flight of fancy able to escape the world of fantasy through the
imposition of white authorship upon the world, an interpretation that owes its existence
not to some attempt to grasp truth about the state of the world but to the insipid
assertions of its white authors. It is not real any more than any desire about the world is; it is merely the
collective aspiration of whites in a white supremacist world taken to be concrete and materiala 21st-century assertion by
a white populace wishing to be free from the tyranny and horror of their white selves but only able to assert their
absolution through the still tyrannical power that racism allows white consensus to have over the realities, material and
psychical, 50 National Society for the Study of Education of racialized peoples: the powerless victims of racism.
Blackness, under post-racialism, is paradigmatized as a viable American existence by
the extent to which it accepts the anti-Black violence and racist inequities that define the
lives of most Black Americans. The Black citizen is rewarded by the extent to which he or
she rationalizes himself or herself as separate from those other Blacks. Aspiring to be the
exceptional Black, to be the citizen and not the slave of empire, creates the logics of being beyond race while seeing the
consequences of racism on the Black bodies condemned to poverty, sentenced to death, and marred by the stain of anti-
Blackness. This is our present-day dilemma where our thought, our critical faculties are revealed to be extensions of,
rather than the refutations to, the present order of knowledge and pedagogy. As academics, we have been taught to
criticize because we are denied the fruits of empire, rather than wage critique as a protest of empires existence. True
Black radicalism that indicts the class fractures within Black intel- ligentsia is thought to be dangerous and divisive
because it makes clear that criticism functions as a means to elevate many Black middle-class thinkers into higher
institutional posts based on their ability to translate the suffering and death of the Black lower class to white entities. Post-
racialism, the idea that race has no material consequence in the world or in the lives of racialized peoples, is simply the
most recent ideological programme deployed to sustain white domination over the ability of Black people to describe their
own histories and narrative their own lives through Blackness. Through
moral condemnation, white
America as- serts that racismthe death of Black men and boys, the poverty of Black
women and families, the economic stagnation of Black folk, and their political
marginalization and repressionis ultimately due to their own (Black) failings, their
inability to advance themselves within the parameters of a civilized/white/American
society. In short, this is a lie.
Sand Creek
There should be
moments of true terror
that would make men think
and that would cause women
to grab hold of children,
loving them, and saving them
for the generations
who would enjoy the rain.
Who are
these farmers,
who are these welders,
who are these scientists,
who are those soldiers
with cold flashing brilliance
and knives.
Who struck aside
the sacred dawn
and was not ashamed
before the natural sun and dew
Artistically,
they splattered blood
along their mad progress;
they claimed the earth
and stole hearts and tongues
from buffalo and men,
the skilled
butchers, aerospace engineers,
physicists they became.
The future should hold them
secret, hidden and profound.
Law Abiding
At first blush an exegesis might be seduced into emphasising what the poems have in commonthe ravages of structural
violence on two oppressed populations of colour. But another look reveals that the two poems are
actually symptomatic of the fact that violence against Native Americans is not analogous
to the violence by which Blacks are elaborated and positioned. The violence of social
death (that is, the violence which saturates Blackness: the violence of slavery, an
ongoing pre-historical relation of violence) is fundamentally different from the violence
which usurps Native American land and attempts to destroy the Indians cultural and
territorial sovereignty. The imaginative labour of these poems is symptomatic of this
difference. In the first section of Sand Creek, the poem establishes the filial integrity of the people who are being
massacred (men [who] think[and] women who grab hold of children, loving them, and saving them for the generations
who would enjoy the rain) So,
what we have is an intuition on the part of the poet that even
though the people being killed are seen as a degraded form of humanity, their humanity
is fundamentally acknowledged; and, in addition, there is a symbiosis, a kind-of cruel
interdependence, between the genocided victims in the opening part of the poem and
the descendants of those committing the genocide (skilled butchers, aerospace
engineers, physicists). In other words, the relational status of both the Indian victims and the White
oppressors is establisheda reciprocal dynamic is acknowledged (between degraded humanity, Indians, and exalted
humanity, White settlers). This reciprocal dynamic is based on the fact that even though one group is massacring the
other, both exist within the same paradigm of recognition and incorporation. Their relation is based on a mutual
recognition of sovereignty. At every scale of abstraction, body, family, community, cosmology, physical terrain,
Native American sovereignty is recognised and incorporated into the consciousness of both Indians and settlers who
destroyed them. The poems coherence is sustained by structural capacity for reciprocity between the genociders and the
genocided. This structural reciprocity gives the poem a vision of hope amid the violence, manifested in a sense of spatial
presence (images of land and weather) and in Ortizs sense that for both groups a future is possible. This means the
Law
violence the Indians suffer has a utility (confiscation and occupation of land) that makes it legible and coherent.
Abiding is predicated on the absence of reciprocity, utility, and contingency that Simon
Ortizs poem takes for granted. Absence of humanity. In fact, the poem suggests that a family of
murdering, inanimate bullets could have its grief and loss processed as grief and loss more readily than the family of a
Black murder victim. Law Abiding doesnt assume that the touchstones of cohesion which
make filiation legible will or can be extended to Blacks. There isin this poemno
mutual futurity into which Blacks and others will find themselves. The future belongs to
the bullet. Filiation belongs to the bullet. Our caring energies will be reserved not for the Black but for the bullet.
Reciprocity is not a constituent element of the struggle between beings who are socially
dead and those who are socially alivethe struggle between Blacks and the world. We
need to apprehend the profound and irreconcilable difference between White supremacy
(the colonial utility of the Sand Creek massacre) and anti-Blackness (the human races
necessity for violence against Black people). The antagonism between the post-colonial
subject and the settler (the Sand Creek massacre, or the Palestinian Nakba) cannotand
should not beanalogised with the violence of social death: that is the violence of slavery,
which did not end in 1865, for the simple reason that slavery did not end in 1865. Slavery is
a relational dynamicnot an event and certainly not a place in space like the South; just as colonialism is a relational
dynamicand that relational dynamic can continue to exist once the settler has left or ceded governmental power. And
these two relations are secured by radically different structures of violence. Afro-pessimism offers an analytic lens that
labour as a corrective to Humanist assumptive logic. It provides a theoretical apparatus which allows Black people to not
have to be burdened by the ruse of analogybecause analogy mystifies, rather than clarifies, Black suffering. Analogy
mystifies Black peoples relationship to other people of colour. Afro-pessimism labor to throw this mystification into relief
without fear of the faults and fissures that are revealed in the process. Let me state the proposition differently: Human Life
is dependent on Black death for its existence and for its conceptual coherence. There is no World without Blacks, yet
there are no Blacks who are in the World. The Black is indeed a sentient being, but the constriction of Humanist thought is
a constitutive disavowal of Blackness as social death; a disavowal that theorises the Black as degraded human entity: i.e.,
as an oppressed worker, a vanquished postcolonial subaltern, or a non-Black woman suffering under the disciplinary
regime of patriarchy. The Black is not a sentient being whose narrative progression has been circumscribed by racism,
colonialism, or even slavery for that matter. Blackness
and Slaveness are inextricably bound in such
a way that whereas Slaveness can be disimbricated from Blackness, Blackness cannot
exist as other than Slaveness. There is a compulsive and repetitive failure in the poem titled Law Abiding; as
though, in writing the poem, I unconsciously realised the futility of asserting something within Blackness that is prior to the
devastation that defines Blackness; and the force of the repetition compulsion with which the poem roils within this
devastation is vertiginous: The D.A.s on it/The judge has been briefed/And your husbands friends are/In the streets.
The poem contains no lines, no fragments which can be cobbled together with enough muscle to check this devastation,
to act on it in a contrapuntal way: this is not a case of the compulsion to repeat, which Freud describes in Beyond the
Pleasure Principle, whereby the repetition is something that seems [] more elementary, more instinctual than the
pleasure principle which it overrides. Law
Abiding contains no political strategy or therapeutic
agency through which the violence which engulfs Black flesh can be separated from the
poems compulsion to repeat that violence. In a normal situationthat is to say, if Law Abiding was a
poem about Human trauma and genocidetherapeutic and/or political intervention could be made to, in the case of
therapy, help the poet become aware of a distinction between the violence he may indeed encounter from the state and a
range of psychic alternatives to letting that violence consume his unconscious; and, in the case of politics, the vision
elaborated by a movement could help the poet imagine a new day, and thus imbue state violence with a temporal finitude
(our day will come, as the IRA used to say, and, so it did; or the Native American dream of Turtle Island restored), even
recourse to political and therapeutic resources
if the poet didnt live to experience that finitude. But
presumes a potential for separating skeins of unconscious compulsion (the poems repetitive
compulsion) from the violence whose incursions are being compulsively repeated. This
presumption only works for Human subjects, subjects whose relationship to violence is
contingent upon their transgressions. The Slaves relationship to violence is not
contingent, it is gratuitousit bleeds out beyond the grasp of narration. Neither filial conflict (to
be resolved, for example, through therapy), nor affilial conflict (to be resolved through politics and insurgent resistance)
has purchase in a struggle for Black redemption (Edward Said offers a helpful description of filial and affilial forms of
relationships in The World, the Text, and the Critic).
Blackness = Ontological
2NC Generic
- blackness = ontological
Policy makers assumes the root of issues within black schools and
try to make useless policy implementations--- the black community
should discuss the issues and propose changes to the policy
makers to avoid an echo chamber of negative effects
Adrienne D. Dixson et al. Jul 2016, Dr. Adrienne D. Dixson is an Associate
Professor of Critical Race Theory and Education in the Department of Education
Policy, Organization and Leadership at the University of Illinois at Urbana-
Champaign. Jul 30, 2016, Educational Policy and the Cultural Politics of Race:
Introduction to the Special Issue
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287403757_Educational_Policy_and_th
e_Cultural_Politics_of_Race_Introduction_to_the_Special_Issue
Milbrey McLaughlin (2006) has noted that policy implementation researchers have come to
understand that what a policy issue is determined to be a problem of is crucial in justifying
certain courses of action, and dele-gitimizing others. This problem of the problem, she
argues, is a struggle over the root causes of policy issues, different interpretations of social
facts (p. 210) that reflect not only differences of opinions but also ideological con-
tention over beliefs and values. If, as W. E. B. Du Bois (1903) asserted, the problem of the
20th century is the problem of the color line, then race has arguably been one of the
most pressing and central problems of educational policy over the past century as well.
Even our own current 21st century pos-tracial and colorblindness flirtations reflect
a persistence of race as prob-lem, a kind of collective desire to not imagine race
as problem (Bonilla-Silva, 1997; Melamed, 2011). Of course, Du Bois (1903) also asked in regard to Black U.S.
citizens, How does it feel to be a problem? Here, he understands that the very existence of racialized
bodies is constructed as a problem, and therefore, we would add, a problem for
policy. Importantly, however, a cultural politics of race is not merely interested in the
hegemonic representa-tion of race and racialized people as problem; it is equally
concerned with how the problem speaks back, agentially, to these
representations. As cul-tural studies scholar Stuart Hall (1990) contended, the study of cultural poli-tics insists on
providing ways of thinking, strategies for survival, and resources for resistance to all those who are nowin economic,
political and cultural termsexcluded from anything that could be called access to the national culture of the national
community (p. 22). Thus, although much educational policy research situates communities of color as on the receiving
end of policy interventions, as the object of policy, or, the problem to be fixed by policy, a cultural politics of race
invites, even insists on, turning that configuration on its head. In addition, youth,
within a cultural politics of
race, we examine how parents, community activists, and other social actors
engage in public and counterpublic deliberation on policy questions, how they
themselves see the problem of race, or more precisely, racism, in educa-tional
policy discourse and practice, and how they then strategize ways to resist what
they understand as a racial assault, effected in and through policy.
Fugitiy/Afro-pessimism
developed much further. For instance the similarities and differences between the movements in
the United States, France, the UK, Germany and Turkey deserve close scrutiny. But my
question today is this: Now that such a movement is underway big time, now that its
resonances roll across large swaths of the white working class, urban police departments,
small town residents, recovering neoliberals, veteran organizations, the right edge of
evangelism, rural outposts, and other sites, what can be done to pull some of those
constituencies in different directions and to improve strategic responses to those that
remain. Because even if Hillary Clinton wins this electiona result not at all certain given the
contingency of events and her major vulnerabilitiesthe resonances Trump has crystallized
may well remain a potent force. He is on the verge of transfiguring the
evangelical/neoliberal/fossil fuel/financial/judicial/dog whistle machine that has been so
powerful in the States for several decades into a neofascist resonance machine that
refigures a few neoliberal priorities to draw the white working class, veteran groups, small
town residents, and rural constituencies more robustly into its orbit. The old machine will not be replaced, then, but
transfigured, with a few old free market priorities jostled to mix an intensification of nationalist, supremacist, protectionist, and Christian forces more explicitly into it. Here are a few thoughts about
regime, the less severe but real plight of the white working class must also be addressed. It has been
caught between weak state efforts to respond to the neglect of urban areas, policies that siphon most of the income and wealth advances into the hands of a very small minority, and pluralizing
Those of us who
forces that pass it by. Bernie Sanders started pursuing policies that would speak to the white working class, African Americans and other minorities together.
care about all these constituencies must now press actively for programs that reduce income
inequality, support job security, universalize retirement benefits and support universal
health care. Perhaps the best place to start is to work closely with labor unions, urban leaders,
and public school teachers on these issues, as well as to work to restructure the
infrastructure of consumption (see # 4). For fascist drives become exacerbated when economic insecurity grows, labor unions are demeaned and public
education is weakened. Such a condition fits the U.S. today, in a situation where neoliberal courts give extravagant freedom to corporations while regulating and confining labor severely.
Moreover, Bernie was right in his call to convert free trade laws into fair trade agreements. The existing agreements have played a role in the deindustrialization of America. New laws, for instance,
could make it impossible for a corporation to leave the town or city that had invested so much in it until it paid back those subsidies. The bias of bankruptcy laws against workers and in favor of
corporations also requires overhauling. Second, the rhetoric of fascism must become a topic of close exploration, as more of us also learn how to work on the visceral register of cultural life in
ways that generate nonviolent counter-energies and aspirations. Close study of how talk shows on the Left do their work is indispensable here. Freeze framing, repetition, concentration on the
gestures and facial demeanor of neofascist speakers, those are merely some the techniques to study. Freeze frame that Trump triumphant smile to expose the narcissism and ruthlessness it
expresses. The Left also needs to nurture more prophetic and charismatic leaders of its own.
Bernie, Cornel West, and Elizabeth Warren provide effective role models here, but many more
voices are needed. The worst idea is to laugh off fascist rhetoric. For, as some previous antifascist movements have
found to their deep dismay, there is never a vacuum on the visceral register of cultural life. If we dont become better at
working on that register in non-manipulative ways other parties will move in during times of high anxiety. Third, it is essential to call out thinly veiled appeals to violence, urban police cover-ups,
and military violence whenever they emerge. This, perhaps, is the one task that has been pursued most effectively during the recent campaign. Fourth, the corporate media, with the exception of
key figures on Fox News, does resist some of the most severe modes of nationalism and white triumphalism. But have you noticed how seldom labor leaders, local community organizers, etc., are
called upon to diagnose issues and expose new possibilities? Rather, we get a proliferation of party hacks and retired security analysts. I exempt Democracy Now from these charges, but
it is a
sustained pressure is needed to get democratic activists onto the key news networks as we also participate in and improve the visibility of internet engagements. Fifth,
difficult but imperative task to publicize how radical changes in the state supported
infrastructure of consumption can simultaneously expose how much the state is already
involved in the corporate organization of consumption options, help poor and working class
people to make ends meet, take an important step toward reducing inequality, and
respond to the generic peril of climate change. Ecology and climate change are not merely white middle class issues; they are Urban, African
American, White Working Class, Native American, and Rural issues too. Activists such as Naomi Klein, Wangari Mathaii, Rob Nixon, John Buell and others have pushed this insight. The
disasters in Flint, Michigan and other urban zones dramatize it. The task now is to bring these
lines of development into closer coordination with one another. Fascist movements
percolate and resonate during times of high anxiety when several previously entitled
constituencies have been left holding the bag. The movements are organized around
exclusionary nationalism, a police state mentality, white supremacy, bellicose militarism,
exclusionary rhetoric, and assaults on democracy.
Link
AT State Link
foremost because of the predominant trajectory of African Americansa history that John Hope Franklin
framed with the apt title From Slavery to Freedom. In 1860, four million African Americans were enslaved while another half-million were free but devoid of
fundamental rights in many of the jurisdictions where they lived. In 1860, the very term African American was something of an oxymoron because the Supreme
the basis for a Second Reconstruction from the 1950s to the 1970s. During that period,
too, the distance traveled by blacks was astonishing. In 1950, segregation was deemed to be consistent with federal
constitutional equal protection. No federal law prevented proprietors of hotels, restaurants, and other privately owned public accommodations from engaging in
racial discrimination. No federal law prohibited private employers from discriminating on a racial basis against applicants for jobs or current employees. No federal
law effectively counteracted racial disenfranchisement. No federal law outlawed racial discrimination in private housing transactions. In contrast, by 1970 federal
Changes in public
that Id live to see a black president. Obamas election is much more than a monument to one politicians talent and good fortune.
attitudes, law, and custom have clearly elevated the fortunes of African Americans as
individuals and black America as a collectivity. Hard facts may give plausibility to the
pessimistic tradition, but they make the optimistic tradition compelling. Despite the many wrongs that
remain to be righted, blacks in America confront fewer racist impediments now than ever before in the history of the United States. The courage, intelligence,
persistence, idealism, and sacrifice of Fannie Lou Hamer and Rosa Parks, Julian Bond and Bob Moses, Medgar Evers and Bayard Rustin, Viola Liuzzo and
Vernon Dahmerand countless other tribunes for racial justicehave not been expended for naught. The facts of day-to-day life allow blacks to sing more
confidently than ever before James Weldon Johnsons magnificent hymn Lift Every Voice and Sing, often referred to as the Black National Anthem: Sing a song
full of the faith that the dark past has taught us Sing a song full of the hope that the present has brought us Facing the rising sun of our new day begun Let us
march on till victory is won. My optimism involves more than a sociological prediction. I am also swayed by my intuition regarding which of these hypothesesthe
pessimistic or the optimisticwill do the most good. Hope is a vital nutrient for effort; without it, there is no prospect for achievement. The belief that we can
otherwise degenerate into nihilism, encourages solidarity in those who might otherwise be
satisfied by purely selfish indulgence, invites strategic planning that can usefully harness
what might otherwise be impotent indignation, and inspires efforts that might otherwise be
avoided due to fatalism.
AT Education Link
Be optimistic about STEM black youth can get involved and change
societal perceptions
Danielle Hildreth 15, dont worry about it, Why STEM Education is so Important
for African American Youths, https://lasentinel.net/why-stem-education-is-so-
important-for-african-american-youths.html
I know the untapped potential for greatness that our young people possess just waiting to be
explored and unleashed. The time to explore that greatness is now and STEM education
(science, technology, engineering and math) is an excellent path to get there. As such, it is of the
utmost importance that we advocate for our students and ensure that schools adhere to
the STEM Education Act of 2015 to advance STEM studies in inner city schools. The STEM
Education ACT of 2015 (H.R. 1020), is a legislative policy that seeks to improve educational performance in American
schools by enhancing the math and science curriculum and school programs. The goal of the STEM Education Act is to
improve STEM instruction in preschool through 12th grade, supplement STEM education through afterschool
partnerships, decrease the disproportionality of a White, male dominated STEM culture and to create a opportunities for a
diverse STEM labor force (U.S. Department of Education, 2015). Its no secret that African American consumers spend an
obscene amount of money on technology. We marvel at the sight of toddlers maneuvering I Pads searching for their
favorite Aps, however, their proficiency to peruse Aps make them more a consumer relative to an inventor. Understanding
the algorithm behind the Aps is what makes one an inventor. As African Americans we hail from a long line of inventors,
and it is time to add more names to that list. STEM education is our new Traffic Light, our new Straightening Comb.
Just as these great inventions by Garrett Morgan and Madame C.J. Walker
revolutionized millions of lives many years ago, STEM education also has the potential
to enhance the lives of future generations. Moreover, the economic advantages of STEM
careers are even more rewarding. According to a study conducted by Georgetown University Center on
Education and the Workforce, approximately 65 percent of wage earners with Bachelors degrees in STEM fields earned
more than Masters degrees employees in non-STEM occupations. The wage difference is so significant that 47 percent
of Bachelors degrees in STEM occupations earn more than PhDs in non-STEM careers (usnews.com, 2012). We
should be as optimistic about STEM education as we were that historic day in 2008 when
Barack Obama was inaugurated. Let STEM be the new voice of Hope and Change in our
communities. We should not allow a racist in a long, black robe or a disgruntled college reject to define who we are.
Stand tall, know your worth and take advantage of the opportunities presented before
you. Our nation would thrive if STEM education was inclusive of all its citizens.
Programs exist that can help black youth get into STEM programs
without causing backlash and re-entrenching harmful stereotypes
Joseph P. Williams 14, Staff Writer at USNews, Bringing STEM Education to
Underserved Communities, https://www.usnews.com/news/stem-
solutions/articles/2014/05/29/bringing-stem-education-to-underserved-
communities
Different educational programs, with different sponsors, based in different parts of the
country. But they all share a single goal: using innovative methods to bring STEM - science,
technology, engineering and math - education to minority students from underserved
communities. The nation is suffering from a lack of full participation in STEM, says Dr.
Freada Kapor Klein, co-founder of the Oakland, California-based Level Playing Field
Institute. In order to fill the tech- and science-focused jobs of the future, STEM industries need to focus on becoming
more diverse now. Science and tech fields are currently dominated by white and Asian males, and minorities in
underserved or struggling school districts are at risk of being left behind, a scenario that has far-reaching economic
consequences for the United States. Unlike
their more affluent counterparts, students who live in
underserved communities typically lack access to what are now considered STEM
basics: up-to-date laboratories, laptop or tablet computers and access to the Internet. On
college campuses, black and Latino students make up less than 20 percent of those studying in science- or math-based
disciplines. On the job, however, minorities make up less than 5 percent of the STEM-based workforce, according to 2012
statistics from the U.S. Department of Labor. At the same time, the U.S. has languished for a decade on global
assessment tests measuring 15-year-old students math and science proficiency, scoring out of the top 20, well below
countries like Lichtenstein and Singapore. More bad news: Within the next decade, according to economists projections,
China, South Korea and India will produce well over half of the worlds engineers and scientists, with the U.S. contributing
well below 10 percent. Unless it ramps up STEM education for all students -- including kids who struggle to obtain it now -
- the U.S., once dominant, will fall further behind the world in the fast-growing global technological economy. Tell me
in what industry where you dont have to do something using computers, says Jay
Sweeney, principal at the Advanced Math and Science Academy, a STEM charter
school in Marlborough, Massachusetts. Even lawyers and Wall Street traders have to
analyze data, problem-solve and think critically, he points out, So were developing
skills for any avenue.
Perm
WILDERSON VOTES AFF
Should the analysis remain at white and black, the world would appear more closed than it in
fact is. For one, simply being born black would bar the possibility of any legitimate
appearance. This is a position that has been taken by a growing group of theorists
known as Afro-pessimists (Wilderson 2010; Sexton 2011). Black for them is absolute
social death: li is outside of relations. Missing from this view is; however, is at least
what I argued in Bad Faith and Antiblack Racism, which is that no human being is
really any of these things; the claim itself is a manifestation of mauvaise foi [bad faith].
The project of making people into such is one thing. People actually becoming such is
another. This is an observation Fanon also makes in his formulation of the tone of
nonbeing and his critique of SelfOther discourses in Peau noir, masques blancs (Black
Skin, White Masks). Fanon distinguishes between the zone of nonbeing (nonappearance as human beings) and
those of being. The latter presumes a self-justified reality, which means it does not call itself into question. The former
faces the problem of illegitimate appearance (Fanon 1952, chapters; Gordon 1999; AIcoir 2006; Yancy 2008). Thus, even
the effort to be is in conflict as the system in question presumes legitimate absence of certain groups. Yet, paradoxically,
the human being comes to the fore through emerging from being in the first place. Thus,
the assertion of being is also an effort to push the human being out of existence, so to speak. The racial conflict is
thus changed to an existential one in which an existential ontology is posed against an
ontology of being. Existential ontology pertains to human being, whereas ontological being pertains to gods. This
is why Fanon concludes that racism is also an attack against human being, as it creates
a world in which one set stands above others as gods and the rest as below human.
Where, in this formulation, stand human beings? The argument itself gains some clarity
with the etymology of existence which is from the Latin expression exsstere (to stand
out, to emerge -that is, to appear). Blacks thus face the paradox of existing (standing out) as
nonexistence (not standing out). The system of racism renders black appearance illicit. This
conundrum of racialized existence affects ethics and morals. Ethical relations are premised on
selves relating to another or others. The others must, however, appear as such, and they too, manifest themselves as
selves. Implicit in such others as other selves is the formalization of ethical relations as equal. as found in the thought of
Immanuel Kant and shifted in deference to the other in that of Emmanuel Levinas, Racism, however, excludes certain
Thus,
groups from being others and selves (if interpreted as being of a kind similar to the presumed legitimate selves).
the schema of racism is one in which the hegemonic group relates to its members as
selves and others, whereas the nonhegemonic groups are neither selves nor others. They,
in effect, could only be such in relation to each other. It is, in other words, a form of ontological segregation as a condition
of ethics and morals. The fight against racism, then, does not work as a fight against being
others or The Other. It is a fight against being nonothers. Fanons insight demands an additional
clarification. Racists should be distinguished from racism. Racists are people who hold beliefs about the
superiority and inferiority of certain groups of racially designated people. Racism is the system of institutions
and social norms that empower individuals with such beliefs. Without that system, a racist
would simply be an obnoxious, whether overtly deprecating or patronizing, individual. With that system,
racist points of view affect the social world as reality. Without that system, racists ultimately become inconsequential and,
in a word, irrelevant beyond personal concerns of saving their souls from unethical and immoral beliefs and choices.
Fanon was concerned with racists in his capacity as a psychiatrist (therapy, if necessary), but he was also concerned with
racism as a philosopher, social thinker, and revolutionary (Fanon 1959/1975). The latter, in other words, is a system, from
an antiracism perspective, in need of eradication. An objection to the Afro-pessimistic assertion of
blackness as social death could thus be raised from a Fanonian phenomenological
perspective: Why must the social world be premised on the attitudes and perspectives of
antiblack racists? Why dont blacks among each other and other communities of color count as a social
perspective? And if the question of racism is a function of power, why not offer a study of power,
how it is gained and lost, instead of an assertion of its manifestations as ontological? An
additional problem with the Afro-pessimistic model is that its proponents treat blackness
as though it could exist independent of other categories. A quick examination of double
consciousness (Du Bois 1903)a phenomenological concept if there ever were one by virtue of the focus on forms of
consciousness and, better, that of which one is conscious, that is, intentionality would reveal why this would not
work. Double consciousness involves seeing oneself from the perspective of another that
deems one as negative (for example, the Afro-pessimistic conception of blackness). That there is already
another perspective makes the subject who lives through double consciousness relational. Added is what Paget
Henry (2005) calls polemic, ted double consciousness and Nahum Chandler (2014, 6o6i) calls the redoubled gesture,
which is the realization that the condemnation of negative meaning means that one must not do what the Afro pessimist
does. Seeingthat that position is false moves one dialectically forward into asking about
the system that attempts to force one into such an identity: This relational matter
requires looking beyond blackness ironically in order to understand blackness. This means
moving from the conception of meaning as singular, substance-based, fixed, and semantical into the grammar of how
meaning is produced. Such grammars, such as that of gender, emerge in interesting ways (Gordon 1999, 124129;
1997,7374). However, as all human beings are manifestations of different dimensions of
meaning, the question of identity requires more than an intersecting model; otherwise
there will simply be one (a priori) normative outcome in every moment of inquiry:
whoever manifests the maximum manifestation of predetermined negative intersecting
terms. That would in effect be an essence before an existence indeed, before an actual
event of harm. This observation emerges as well with the Afro-pessimist model when one thinks of
pessimism as the guiding attitude. The existential phenomenological critique would be that optimism and pessimism are
Human existence is contingent but not
symptomatic of the same attitude: a priori assertions on reality.
accidental, which means that the social world at hand is a manifestation of choices and
relationships in other words, human actions. Because human beings can only build the future
instead of it determining us, the task at hand, as phenomenologyoriented existentialists from Beauvoir and
Sartre to Fanon, William R. Jones, and this author have argued, depends on commitment. This concern also pertains to
the initial concerns about authenticity discourses with which I began. One could only be pessimistic about an outcome, an
activity. It is an act of forecasting what could only be meaningful once actually performed. Similarly, one could only be
optimistic about the same. What however, if there were no way to know either? Here we come to the foi [faith] element in
mauvaise foi [bad faith]. Some actions are deontological, and if not that, they are at least reflections of our commitments,
our projects. Thus, the point of some actions is not about their success or failure but whether we deem them worth doing.
Taking responsibility for such actionsbringing value to them is opposed to another
manifestation of mauvaise foi [bad faith]: the spirit of seriousness. The spirit of seriousness
involves attributing a form of materiality to human values that elides the human role in the
construction of those values. Detailed analyses of this form of mauvaise foi [bad faith] in Africana
phenomenology emerges in the thought of George Yancy (2008) and this author (Gordon 1995,
1997, 1999, 2000). The importance of this concept pertains to the understanding of racism as
a social phenomenon but also as a value. It addresses what Abdul JanMohamed (2011) calls our
social investments in such phenomena. Returning to the distinction between racists and
racism, the former are what existentialists such as Sartre and Beauvoir call serious people and the
latter is the system that supports such values as supposedly objective features of reality.
In other words, the formers values are preserved in the latter as ontological. The turn to
social reality raises an important theme of Africana phenomenology, and, indeed, all phenomenological treatments of
oppression: Discussions of race and gender make no sense without a philosophical anthropology. In Africana philosophy,
the answer is straightforward: Euro-modernity denied the humanity of whole groups of people, which means the question
of what it is to be human was crucial. These considerations emerged not only in colonial and racist terms but also at
reflective levels of method as hegemonic models of "science" began to dominate concerns for legitimacy. Many such
models were premised, however, on ideological frameworks in which greater value was placed on "purity" in which
mixture is supposedly "impure." The result is a philosophical anthropology in search of so- called purity as a standard of
not only human value but also identity.
Kimberly Crenshaw (1991) offers a critique through her
work on intersectionality in legal theory. Examples in Africana phenomenology include Michael Monahan's
The Creolizing Subject (2011), Jane Anna Gordon's Creolizing Political Theory (2014), and writings by this author (Gordon
1997, 2006, 2010). Thearguments they advanced reject any philosophical anthropology of
converging "purities," where separate, pure "races" meet. Instead, the notion of racial
purity is rejected from the outset. The authors, however, go further, as with the
discussion of intersectionality, to propose questions of mixture at methodological levels.
It is the appeal to methodological purity that obscures lived realities of mixture. In other
words, the actual human world is not one of purity (being-in-and-by-itself) but instead relations of living
negations of purity (existence, being-and-negations-of-and-for-being, and more). Monahan and J. Gordon prefer the term
creolizing for this reason because it is, they contend, a radical kind of mixture-one that in effect manifests not only new
forms of being but also challenges the stasis of being. Their use of the present participle is to illustrate that mixing-
especially of the licit and the illicit-is not a closed achievement but instead an ongoing activity of reality. From their
argument, purity, like normativity, is an effort of imposing closure on the openness or, as Fryer
contends (2008), queer dimensions of reality. Put differently, ascribing ontological status to
purity and straightness does not work. It requires, in effect, denying the elements of reality
that do not match up and involves attempting to force reality into a preferred or pleasing
falsehood instead of a (for the purist) displeasing truth. In effect, creolizing militates against disciplinary
decadence or, in other words, mauvaise foi [bad faith]. As the context is human reality, the conclusion of Africana
phenomenology presenting an open anthropology comes to the fore. This openness raises one of the
final ingredients, if we will, for this discussion: the relationships between humanity and freedom. The freedom question is
paradoxical: to be free means also to possess the ability to evade it. This is what critics of this approach, premised on a
phenomenological treatment of mauvaise foi miss. Existential phenomenology collapses into an essentialism, they
protest, because of the assertion of human reality as freedom. Others also read discussions of mauvaise foi as appealing
to an essential unavoidability collapsed into futility. What they fail to ask, however, is what human reality would be if
human beings were incapable of acting in mauvaise foi. Could a being incapable of attempting to evade its freedom truly
be free? Would not the absence of that capability mean human beings must essentially act in good faith? What, then,
would happen to freedom? And if there were no freedom, wouldn't human beings simply have a nature that poses none of
the recognizable human problems because human behavior would already be determined? These considerations
occasion what could be called an indirect proof: Human freedom exists by virtue of our efforts to evade it. This kind of
argument is also, by the way, a form of transcendental argument as it points to a condition for the possibility of what is
being studied. This kind of transcendentalism, where existence and conditions of possibility meet, could also be called
ironic as it is premised on what "is" by virtue of what it is not. Peter Caws (1992), in his discussion of Sartre's structuralism
in his debate with Levi-Strauss, reminds us that the aim of bringing human responsibility to human relations is a plea for
the realization of the human role in a human world. It is structure in human terms, which means it requires a philosophical
anthropology premised on metaevaluation, metacritique, metatheory, and incompleteness. I regard all this as a way of
saying that Euro-modernity posed challenges to what it means to be human, free, and responsible for the conditions by
Race, gender, class, and sexuality, from this perspective, can be
which any practice as such is justified.
illuminated through these three considerations, but we should remember that, as
illumination, we receive only part of the story as these categories and their relationship to
each other are, from this approach, still in the making. There could, in other words, be more
categories to come as the relationship across the extant human identities continue to shift
and disorient what it means to be human.
Confining black liberation to political rejection delegitimizes
progressive potential--- keeps the current political stationary
Kline 17, David Kline is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Religion at Rice
University. His research addresses issues in political theology, biopolitical
thought, and critical race theory. The Pragmatics of Resistance Framing Anti-
Blackness and the Limits of Political Ontology,
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/645848#back
Furthermore, arriving at the second analytical expense of Wildersons prioritization of political ontology, I suggest that
such a flattening of the social field of Blackness rigidly delimits what counts as legitimate
political resistance. If the framework for thinking resistance and the possibility of creating
another world is reduced to rigid ontological positions defined by the absolute power of
the law, and if Black existence is understood only as ontologically fixed at the extreme
zero point of social death without recourse to anything within its own position qua Blackness,
then there is not much room for strategizing or even imagining resistance to anti-
Blackness that is not wholly limited to expressions and events of radically apocalyptic
political violence: the law is either destroyed entirely, or there is no freedom. This is not to say that I am
necessarily against radical political violence or its use as an effective tactic. Nor is to say that I think the law should
be left unchallenged in its total operation, but rather that there might be other and more
pragmatically oriented practices of resistance that do not necessarily have the absolute
destruction of the law as their immediate aim that should count as genuine resistance to
anti-Blackness. For Wilderson, like Agamben, anything less than an absolute overturning [End Page 59] of the order
of things, the violent destruction and annihilation of the full structure of antagonisms, is deemed as [having nothing] to do
with Black liberation (quoted in Zug 2010). Of course, the desire for the absolute overturning of the currently existing
world, the decisive end of the existing world and the arrival of a new world in which Blacks do not magnetize bullets
the severity and gratuitous nature of the macropolitics of
should be absolutely affirmed. Further,
anti-Blackness in relation to the possibility of a movement towards freedom should not
be bracketed or displaced for the sake of appealing to any non-Black grammar of
exploitation or alienation (Wilderson 2010, 142). The question I want to pose, however, is how the insistence on
the absolute priority of framing this world within a rigid structure of formal ontological positions can only revert to what
amounts to a kind of negative theological and eschatological blank horizon in which actually existing social sites and
modes of resisting praxis are displaced and devalued by notions of whatever it is that might arrive from beyond. It seems
that Wilderson, again, is close to Agamben on this point, whose ontological structure also severely delimits what might
count as genuine resistance to the regime of sovereignty. As Dominick LaCapra points out regarding the possibility of
liberation outside of Agambens formal ontological structure of bare life and sovereignty, A further enigmatic conjunction in
Agamben is between pure possibility and the reduction of being to mere or naked life, for it is the emergence of mere
naked life in accomplished nihilism that simultaneously generates, as a kind of miraculous antibody or creation ex nihilo,
pure possibility or utterly blank utopianism not limited by the constraints of the past or by normative structures of any sort.
(LaCapra 2009, 168) With lifes ontological reduction to the abjection of bare life or social death, the only possible way
out, it seems, is the impossible possibility of what Agamben refers to as the suspension of the suspension, the laying
aside of the distinction between bare life and political life, the Shabbat of both animal and man (Agamben 2003, 92). It is
in this sense that Agamben offers, again in the words of LaCapra, a negative theology in extremis . . . an empty
utopianism of pure, unlimited possibility (LaCapra 2009, 166). The result is a discounting and devaluing of other, perhaps
more pragmatic and less eschatological, practices of resistance. With
the all or nothing [End Page 60]
approach that posits anything less than the absolute suspension of the current state of
things as unable to address the violence and abjection of bare life, there is not much left
in which to appeal than a kind of apocalyptic, messianic, and contentless eschatological
future space defined by whatever this world is not.
Blackness range outside of the idea of ontology
Kline 17, David Kline is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Religion at Rice
University. His research addresses issues in political theology, biopolitical
thought, and critical race theory. The Pragmatics of Resistance Framing Anti-
Blackness and the Limits of Political Ontology,
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/645848#back
Focusing on Wilderson, his absolute prioritization of a political onto-logical structure in which
the law relegates Black being into the singular position of social death happens, I contend,
at the expense of two significant things that I am hesitant to bracket for the sake of prioritizing political
ontology as the sole frame of reference for both analyzing anti-Black racism and thinking resistance
within the racialized world. First, it short-circuits an analysis of power that might reveal not only
how the practices, forms, and apparatuses of anti-Black racism have historically
developed, changed, and reassembled/reterritorialized in relation to state power,
national identity, philosophical discourse, biological discourse, political discourse, and so
onchanges that, despite Wildersons claim that focusing on these things only mystify the question of ontology
(Wilderson 2010, 10), surely have implications for how racial positioning is both thought and resisted in differing historical
and socio-political contexts. To
the extent that Blackness equals a singular ontological position
within a macropolitical structure of antagonism, there is almost no room to bring in the
spectrum and flow of social difference and contingency that no doubt spans across
Black identity as a legitimate issue of analysis and as a site/sight for the possibility of a
range of resisting practices. This bracketing of difference leads him to make some rather sweeping and
opaquely abstract claims. For example, discussing a main characters abortion in a prison cell in the 1976 film Bush
Mama, Wilderson says, Dorothy will abort her baby at the clinic or on the floor of her prison cell, not because she fights
forand either wins [End Page 58] or losesthe right to do so, but because she is one of 35 million accumulated and
fungible (owned and exchangeable) objects living among 230 million subjectswhich is to say, her will is always already
subsumed by the will of civil society (Wilderson 2010, 128, italics mine). What I want to press here is how Wildersons
statement, made in the sole frame of a totalizing political ontology overshadowing all other levels of sociality, flattens out
the social difference within, and even the possibility of, a micropolitical social field of 35 million Black people living in the
United States. Sucha flattening reduces the optic of anti-Black racism as well as Black
sociality to the frame of political ontology where Blackness remains stuck in a singular
position of abjection. The result is a severe analytical limitation in terms of the way
Blackness (as well as other racial positions) exists across an extremely wide field of
sociality that is comprised of differing intensities of forces and relational modes between
various institutional, political, socio-economic, religious, sexual, and other social
conjunctures. Within Wildersons political ontological frame, it seems that these conjunctures are excludedor at
least bracketedas having any bearing at all on how anti-Black power functions and is resisted across highly
differentiated contexts. There is only the binary ontological distinction of Black and Human being; only a macropolitics of
sedimented abjection.
pessimism comes from a painful and brutal history of slavery and its aftermath. And
statistics tell us that we still have a lot not to cheer about, like the 14 percent unemployment rate among blacks
(nearly double the national average) or the monstrous murder rate in Chicago, where 80 percent of the 500 homicide victims in 2012 were black. We are
depressed when we hear that the gap in high school graduation rates for white and black males only narrowed by 3 percent in 10 years, and when we learn that,
But what is also real is that against unimaginable odds, we are still here. We forged
ourselves, with the full, white weight of the Western world bearing down us, into what W.E.B. Du
Bois called a small nation of people. This black nation is united less by any single African, pre-American past than by what Ralph Ellison termed an identity of
liberated master and slave. To say that we all emerged in heroic fashion would be a lie. Being human, people tend to go inward and internalize
the degradation and lack of hope around them. That, of course, is not an exclusively black thing, as evidenced by the sad condition of Native Americans, Kurds,
Roma and many other oppressed people on the planet. While pessimism under unrelenting and brutal conditions is understandable, it ceases to be useful when
Obama becomes too much to process, and we shy away from the work of overhauling
negative thinking. We shift into thinking that any kind of African-American advancement is a
sham, a trick, a hustle; an unforgivable delusion unfit for those who keep it real. Afro-
pessimism is bad enough when its just about lack of positive action. But it plays out in our young people in the
worst aspects of popular and hip-hop culture, where a black kid is called acting white for speaking in non-accented Standard English, and God forbid, excelling in
revolution; where black prison culture is celebrated and rewarded by the larger white
community and by the medias insatiable appetite for black life on the mean streets. The good news is that Afro-pessimism is a
cultural response, and though it is shaped by socio-economic forces, it is reversible through
the same kind of positive, cultural engineering that all humans are capable of. For starters, Afro-
pessimists should consider our political history as black people, and as Americans.
Remember that most of our victories dont happen overnight. Second, we need to carefully scrutinize the presidents policies
and the strategies that underpin them. As the Harvard sociologist Orlando Patterson wrote in the New York Times: Mr. Obamas writings, politics and personal
relations suggest ... that he prefers a three-pronged strategy. First, he is committed to the universalist position that the best way to help the black and Latino poor
is to help all disadvantaged people, Appalachian whites included. The outrage of black over-incarceration will be remedied by quietly reforming the justice system
Second, Mr. Obama appears convinced that residential segregation lies at the heart of both black problems and cultural racism. He is a committed integrationist
and seems to favor policies intended to move people out of the inner cities. Third, he clearly considers education to be the major solution and has tried to lavishly
finance our schools, despite the fiscal crisis. More broadly, he will quietly promote policies that celebrate the common culture of America, emphasizing the
extraordinary role of blacks and other minorities in this continuing creation. Here are two examples that support Pattersons analysis: 1) the presidents expansion
of the Child Tax Credit and Earned Income Tax Credit in 2010, which benefited about 2.2 million African American families and nearly half of all African American
children, while extending unemployment insurance to benefit over a million African Americans; and 2) the African-American Education Initiative, an executive order
created to improve the educational outcomes for African Americans of all ages; and help ensure that African Americans receive a complete and competitive
education that prepares them for college, a satisfying career, and productive citizenship. Examining evidence of Obamas positive effect on the black community
we are witnessing an
can help lift the veil of Afro-pessimism, and allow us to view his reelection in a more realistic and positive light. Remember,
event that was unimaginable less than 10 years ago. If a black, mixed-race brother raised in
Hawaii and Indonesia, with a Muslim-sounding name a few years after 9/11 can win the
presidency twice especially after four years of vicious racist attacks then simply put, all is possible. We no longer have
the option of rising to our lowest expectations.