Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
V. Saydam 1, X. Duan 1
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. Johns, NL,
Canada, A1B 3X7
Abstract
In this study, stability of nanoparticles and thermal properties of NEPCMs were
investigated. Paraffin wax with a phase change temperature of 53-57 C was chosen as a PCM.
nanoparticles were selected as enhancers. Nanoparticles were dispersed into paraffin wax using
mechanical dispersion methods (sonication, stirring) with and without surfactants at varying mass
fractions (0.1,0.5,1,2 wt.%). Thermal conductivity of samples was measured using KD2 Pro
(Decagon Devices) based on Transient-Hot-Wire(THW) method. Results showed that the increase
of nanoparticle content did not improve thermal conductivity significantly with the highest
enhancement of 13% for 2 wt. MWCNT added wax at 35C. Stability of nanoparticles were
investigated extensively. Visualization method was adopted for stability observation after
deposition and coagulation were seen over thermal cycles regardless of the nanoparticle type,
nanoparticle content and dispersion methods. DSC study revealed that unlike the common belief,
supercooling effect became worse with the addition of nanoparticles except for 0.5 and 1 wt.%
MWCNT-wax sample.
1
1.Introduction
Growth of energy demand throughout the world requires efficient use of renewable energy
sources. The intermittency and inconsistency of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar
necessitates the usage of energy storage. Application of latent heat energy storage systems has a
great potential. Thermal energy storages that take advantage of the high latent heat of phase change
materials (PCMs) have been used extensively [1]. Many PCMs have low thermal conductivities
and several methods have been tried to improve that, for example by inserting metallic fins and
matrix structures into PCM containers [2]. In recent years, there is a growing interest of dispersing
conductivity compared to metallic oxide nanoparticles [4]. MWCNTs and graphene are the most
prominently used carbon based nanoparticles while Aluminum oxide and Copper oxide are also
commonly preferred metallic oxide particles. There have been numerous studies with various
nanoparticles. Fan et al. [5] compared the effects of various nanoparticles on paraffin wax and
found that increasing temperature resulted in lower thermal conductivity. However, the increasing
content of nanoparticles gave rise to dramatic improvement for GNPs from 0.264 W/m K to 0.7
W/m K for 5 wt.% concentration. The outstanding performance of GNPs was attributed to the planar
structure and reduced interfacial thermal resistance. They also found that long and short-walled CNTs
did not provide notable enhancement in thermal properties. Angayarkani and Philip [6] observed
considerable thermal conductivity increase for hexadecane with MWCNT and GNPs dispersed at
0.5 wt% up to %195 and %180, respectively. They reported that enhancement only took place up
conductivity due to agglomeration of nanoparticles. Warzoha and Fleischer [7] examined the effect
2
of various nanoparticles including graphene, MWCNTs, on the thermal properties of
paraffin(Tm=56C) at high concentration (20 vol.%). The thermal conductivity of graphene and
MWCNTs added samples was improved enormously by 2800% and 832% respectively.
Wang et al. [8] studied paraffin wax with a melting temperature range of 52 to 54 C
incorporated with MWCNT of 0.2 to 2 wt. % and reported thermal conductivity enhancement of
40% at 60 and 35% at 35 . Another study done by Kumaresan et al. [9] showed that increasing
volume concentration of MWCNT from 0.15% to 0.6% in paraffin not only improved thermal
conductivity of the PCM but also mitigated the super cooling issue. Tang et. al [10] observed
paraffin wax. This improvement was further confirmed by reduction in heating and cooling time
of the samples with 1, 5 and 10 wt.% f-MWCNTs content. A research by Yu et al. [11] found
insignificant improvement in thermal conductivity in liquid phase paraffin wax (with 1 to 4 wt. %
MWCNT) and highly clustered emulsions. Wu et al. [12] also reached the same conclusion after
dispersing MWCNT to paraffin. Fan et al. [13] dispersed graphene nanoplatelets into 1-
tetradecanol at varying concentrations (0.5, 1, 3 wt.%). The presence of graphene doubled the
thermal conductivity at 45C for 3 wt.% nanoparticle content. Wang et al. [14] analysed the impact
of -Al2O3 nanoparticles on the thermal properties of paraffin wax having a melting temperature
range of 52-54C. Higher enhancement was achieved for solid phase at various levels than liquid
phase reaching up to %25 with increasing loadings of nanoparticle. However, the increase in
temperature lowered the thermal conductivity both in liquid and solid phases. Ho and Gao [15]
3
loading was seen. Increased temperature, particularly at 60C, led to higher enhancement in
thermal conductivity.
Another important part of dispersion of nanoparticles into PCMs is stability. Stability term
for NEPCMs is referred to the uniform dispersion of nanoparticles within the base PCM without
any agglomeration or clusters. It is vitally important for the future of thermal energy storage units
with NEPCMs. Marketability of these systems totally depends on the long-term reliability and
consistent high performance of NEPCMs. NEPCMs should perform with their enhanced properties
invariably over a long time. Therefore, NEPCMs must be tested with the conditions that are like
Some studies considered stability of nano-enhanced PCMs through observing the thermal
properties over thermal cycles. Kumerasan et. al. [9] did a visual inspection of MWCNT dispersed
paraffin (Tm=19-22C) to monitor stability. They claimed visually stable samples for various
concentrations (0.15, 0.3, 0.45,0.6 wt.%) after three months. Tang et. al. [10] found that stability
of functionalized MWCNTs through acidic treatment with octadecylamine was much better
without any visible settlement than crude MWCNTs in toluene. Cyclic stability was also
maintained after 100 thermal cycles without any significant change in latent heat of fusion, phase
wax(Tm=52-54C) was carried out by Wang et. al. [8]. Ball-milling treated MWCNTs were found
to be homogeneously dispersed without any lamination through SEM images after being kept in
oven at 70C for 96 h. Angayarkanni and Philip [6] observed the change in thermal conductivity
of GNPs and MWCNT dispersed paraffin having a melting temperature of 18C after five thermal
cycles. It was found that thermal conductivity enhancement fluctuates and mainly tends to decrease
for solid phase at 10C as nanocomposites undergo thermal cycles. Weinstein et. al. [16]
4
incorporated graphite with different geometries into paraffin wax(Tm=56C) and monitored the
heat transfer enhancement by monitoring transient temperature change at different heat flux.
Significant settlement was observed after third thermal cycle. Therefore, sonication application
was repeated after each test. Wu et. al. [17] dispersed Cu, Al, and C/Cu nanoparticles into
paraffin(Tm=58-60C) with different surfactants to see the effects on thermal properties and
stability. Samples with Hitenol BC-10 surfactant were found to be most stable after 12 h by visual
inspection. Nanocomposites were observed to be stable in terms of phase change temperature and
latent heat of fusion after 100 thermal cycles. Fan et. al [13] pointed out that GNPs dispersion in
to the presence of commercial dispersant. However, further thermal cycles caused significant
precipitation. Cyclic stability of CNTs added 1-dodecanol (Tm=22C) was examined visually by
Zeng et. al [18]. Specimens were found to be settlement-free after two melting/solidification
cycles. With the third cycles, sedimentation took place. However, specimens were observed to
Surfactant treated stearic acid with MWCNT, graphene and graphite NEPCM was studied by Choi
et al [19]. It was noted that samples with PVP surfactants did not experience settlement after 10
days whereas samples without surfactants were found to be immensely agglomerated and settled.
Wang et al. [20] compared the stability of palmitic acid with pristine and oleylamine-octanol
treated CNTs. Thermal cycles performed in an oven showed that grafted CNTs maintained their
homogeneity after 80 melting/solidification samples while delamination was prevalent for pristine
CNTs- palmitic acid sample even after first cycle. Zhang et al. [21] investigated the suspension
time of untreated and surface treated MWCNTs with various surfactants in n-hexadecane. Surface
treated MWCNT with 1-decanol provided the longest suspension time (290 min) compared to
5
other combinations. Zheng et al.[22] examined the suspension quality of graphite particles in
hexadecane at low concentration (0.05%). Overall suspension of graphite flakes was maintained
providing the percolation network both in liquid and solid phase. Mehrali et. al. [23] impregnated
paraffin wax (Tm= 50-60C) into graphene oxide(GO) sheets to create stabilized nano composites
for thermal energy storage systems. DSC measurements revealed that the nanocomposites
maintained their properties, particularly; latent heat and phase change temperature with only slight
deviations up to 2500 thermal cycles. Nourani et. al. [24] conducted a stability study of Al2O3
dispersed paraffin wax using image analysis. They found that sedimentation rate increased
Previous studies mostly focused on the thermal stability of NEPCMs based on DSC results.
Moreover, thermal conductivity enhancement results were usually obtained when the samples are
at the most stable state. As per the authors knowledge, nothing systematically was done pertaining
to the stability issue of NEPCMs after melting/solidification cycles and monitor the thermal
conductivity of NEPCMs over time. Given this fact, comprehensive stability study was conducted
All the materials including nanoparticles, base PCM and surfactants were purchased from
Sigma Aldrich. Paraffin wax has a phase change temperature of 53-57C. MWCNTs have the
nanoparticles have less than 50 nm particle size and graphene nanoplatelets have lateral
dimensions of about 2-3 as specified by the manufacturer. Sodium oleate and octadecylamine
were used as surfactants to promote long term stability. Fig.1 shows the materials.
6
2.2 Sample Preparation
NEPCM preparation can be divided into two categories namely mechanical dispersion and
chemical dispersion methods. These methods are mostly adopted from nanofluid science.
Mechanical dispersion method consists of stirring and sonication where mechanical energy is used
to agitate nanoparticles. Stirring helps nanoparticles disperse at macro scale by spinning a stirring
bar in the liquid medium whereas sonication basically creates cavitation during application
resulting in micro bubble formation. The collapse of these micro bubbles leads to the
dispersion [25]. In chemical dispersion methods, surfactants are used to make nanoparticles more
miscible by lowering the surface energy levels at the interface of base PCM and nanoparticles [26].
Furthermore, nanoparticles can also be treated through functionalization (acid treatment) for better
dispersion [10].
The first batch of samples were prepared with only mechanical dispersion method. A desired
amount of each nanoparticles corresponding to 0.5, 1 and 2 % by mass and paraffin wax were first
Adventurer Pro AV8101C, respectively). Then, paraffin was melted in a beaker on a hot plate
stirrer (SP131320-33Q, Cimarec - Thermo Scientific). Temperature of the hot plate stirred was
kept above melting temperature at 70C. Magnetic stirring was applied for 1 h at average speed
after adding the specified amount of nanoparticles. Stirring was followed by sonicating the samples
for an hour at 30% amplitude (50W, Sonifier Cell Disrupter, Branson). Fig. 2 shows the sample
preparation process.
7
2.3 Thermal Conductivity Measurements
Analyzer (Decagon Devices, USA). The measurement technique is based on the transient hot
wire(THW) principle. After sonication, samples were taken to environmental chamber and thermal
conductivity measurements were first conducted in liquid phase at 70C within the first hour after
sample preparation. Then, temperature was set to 60C and measurements were repeated at that
temperature hourly as shown in fig 3. Four measurements were taken at each point, at least. The
main purpose was to observe if there is any change in thermal conductivity due to sedimentation
After the measurements were done in liquid phase, the samples were poured into a mold
designed for solid phase measurements. The mold was printed on a 3-D printer to create a pilot
hole in the sample during solidification (fig.4). Once samples were fully solidified at ambient
temperature, measurements were conducted in the thermal chamber at 25, 35 and 45C. The
pictures of solid samples can be seen in fig 5. At least 3 measurements were taken for each point.
Measurements revealed that thermal conductivity ranges within 0.15 to 0.16 W/m K for
paraffin wax with different concentrations of MWCNT in liquid phase at 60C. There was not any
significant change in thermal conductivity within the first four hours after sample preparation
(Fig.3). However, there was an anomaly for 1 wt.% MWCNT at 60C after 1 h. It was seen that
samples were highly viscous with mud-like texture as the MWCNT content increased from 0.5 to
2 wt.%. This could deteriorate the natural convection induced melting. After the consecutive
measurements, the samples were put into a mold and left to solidify at room temperature. Solid
35C for all the concentrations possibly due to solid-solid transition. The highest enhancement was
8
achieved for 2 wt.% MWCNT-paraffin wax by 13% at 35C (Fig.6). Overall, no significant
improvement in thermal conductivity was observed with the addition of MWCNT. In some cases,
initial measurements right after sample preparation within the first hour showed that thermal
conductivity increases sharply for all the concentrations from 0.15 to 0.21 W/mK at 70C(Fig.6).
This increase caused by the natural convection induced by particle motion. However, after the first
hour, the measurements at 60C indicated only a marginal increase. This can be accounted for the
sedimentation of majority of graphene particles when thermal equilibrium was reached after a
sufficient time. Thermal conductivity measurements changed slightly for the consecutive
measurements made at 60C. After liquid phase measurements, samples were poured into the
mold. It was seen that majority of particles were stuck on the bottom surface proving the settlement
of particles. Therefore, it could be said that measurements for graphene doped paraffin do not
really represent the actual nanoparticle content of the samples. Only small fraction of particles that
were dispersed in to paraffin were uniformly scattered improving the thermal conductivity slightly.
Thus, the accuracy of measurements are questionable due to instability for graphene added paraffin
wax samples. Addition of graphene nanoplatelets increased the thermal conductivity only
marginally ranging from 0.16-0.17 W/m K at 60C (Fig.8). Increasing nanoparticles linearly did
not lead to proportional enhancement in thermal conductivity. The particle settlement played an
important role in not providing the desired enhancement. This is more evident in solid phase where
measurements were made at 25, 35 and 45 C. It was seen that increasing graphene nanoplatelet
content led to a minor increase. This is also attributed to reduced graphene content due to not being
9
able to transfer particularly the particles that got stuck on the bottom surface into a mold.
Consequently, graphene did not provide the desired thermal conductivity enhancement.
slightly. This enhancement, however, was not proportional with the nanoparticle increase. Lower
loadings of Al2O3 resulted in higher enhancement in liquid phase even with an outlier at 70C for
0.5 wt.% Al2O3 due to natural convection possibly induced by Brownian motion (Fig. 6).
Precipitation issue again affected the measurements. It was seen that particles started to settle
immediately once sonication is completed. Therefore, it is not possible to evaluate the potential of
nanoparticles based on the obtained data. Solid phase measurements also revealed biased results
mainly fluctuating within the vicinity of pure paraffin waxs thermal conductivity without any
clear trend. It was also seen that there is just a little change in thermal conductivity with a mild
decrease for the measurements that were done an hour later after sample preparation (Fig. 3). This
DSC study was carried out to determine melting/solidification temperatures and latent heat
Calorimeter). Fig. 7 shows the heating and cooling curves of the samples with a heating/cooling
rate of 5C/min. Two distinct peaks can be seen on both heating and cooling curves where smaller
peak corresponds to solid-solid transition at around 35C and larger peak exhibits the solid-liquid
The peak temperatures of pure paraffin wax for melting and freezing were found to be 54.86 and
53.02 C respectively. This demonstrates the insignificant supercooling with 1.84C. The presence
10
of nanoparticles seemed to increase the melting peak temperatures by1-2C except for MWCNT-
wax samples while the freezing peak temperature were reduced with the same effect except for 0.5
wt.% Al2O3 -wax sample. Supercooling issue became worse with the addition of nanoparticles
reaching up to 4.25C except for 0.5 and 1 wt.% MWCNT-wax samples. This unusual behavior
contradicts the common belief that nanoparticles lessen the supercooling issue by acting as a
nucleating agent [9, 10]. Phase change enthalpies were also found to be 124.61 and 126.84 J/g for
pure paraffin during melting and freezing curves, respectively. Nanoparticle addition had different
effects on the phase change enthalpies. A varying degree of decrease in enthalpies was seen for all
the nanoparticle-wax samples at the highest concentration(2wt.%).However, the trend for other
One of the main objectives of this study was to investigate the effect of mechanical
Pictures of samples were taken after each cycle in liquid phase to assess the uniformity and
homogeneity of particle dispersion visually. Fig. 8 shows the samples with varying sonication time
Reasonably stable condition with insignificant settlement was attained for all the samples
after the first thermal cycle as shown in Fig. 8. However, considerable particle settlement took
place with the second thermal cycle. After the third thermal cycle, significant precipitation and
agglomeration were observed. It can be clearly seen in Fig. 8(2-3) that particles formed clusters
11
on the lower portion of the container whereas the upper part is mainly composed of paraffin. It is
evident after the third thermal cycle that up to a certain height, samples have dark color potentially
indicating highly agglomerated regions(Fig.8). However, the region close to surface seems
transparent showing that there is no particle network. This could be attributed to the fact that the
density of the nanoparticle is higher than that of paraffin resulting in particles settled on the lower
part.
It was noticed that different sonication durations do not seem to have any effect on the
settlement are unavoidable over these thermal cycles. It was also found that stability becomes
worse dramatically for all the samples regardless of MWCNT content. It should be noted that
temporary stable NEPCM was observed for sample D and E after the second thermal cycle. That
was due to beaker replacement. However, sample D and E follow the same trend as sample A, B
and C in terms of particle settlement as it is obvious after the third thermal cycle in Fig 8.(3).
After the first stage of the stability study, it was acknowledged that mechanical dispersion
methods namely stirring and sonication are not sufficient to achieve long term stability.
Consequently, it was decided that surfactant should be used to stabilize nanoparticles. For this
purpose, sodium oleate (anionic) was used during the preparation of samples (Fig.1-E). Three
different NEPCM samples including Aluminum oxide (<50 nm particle size, spherical), Graphene
nanoplatelets (lateral dimensions of about 2-3 , planary) and MWCNTs were prepared with
paraffin wax as base PCM at 0.1% wt. Previous NEPCM preparation procedure was followed. The
12
only difference was that sodium oleate with the mass ratio of 1:10 to nanoparticle amount was
added to molten paraffin wax-nanoparticle solution during stirring. Then, sonication was done for
1h at %30 amplitude. After all the samples were prepared, melting-solidification thermal cycles
were performed between 25-80C in the environmental chamber again to see the effect of
surfactant usage on the stability of NEPCM composites. Pictures taken after each cycle are shown
in Fig. 10 both in solid and liquid phase. The pictures of samples right after preparation are also
included.
As can be seen from Fig 10., the stability evaluation for MWCNT-paraffin wax composite
is much more distinct than the other two samples. It can be said that MWCNTs within paraffin
seems uniformly dispersed and relatively stable after sample preparation in liquid phase (pictures
labeled as 0). However, the thin particle free regions appeared with the second thermal cycle. As
the MWCNT-paraffin wax sample went through thermal cycles, those regions started growing and
finally forming a particle-free layer on top while the MWCNTs settled on the bottom of the
container. The deterioration of uniform dispersion is apparent in both liquid and solid phase for
MWCNT-paraffin sample.
It is hard to assess the stability of Aluminum particles in solid phase due to color turning
white during solidification. However, it was noticed that majority of white aluminum particles
precipitated at the bottom of the container even after the first thermal cycle in liquid phase. Only
small number of particles were floating within the paraffin matrix. Closer look to the sample
revealed that the portion of particles suspended in paraffin wax decreased as the Aluminum oxide-
Even though evaluating graphene nanoplatelets dispersion in paraffin wax is not as easy
as MWCNTs, it can be said that graphene nanoplatelets dispersion was better compared to
13
Aluminum oxide and MWCNTs. In liquid phase, graphene nanoparticles seemed to maintain its
uniform dispersion over thermal cycles. However, when the samples were solidified after each
The same sample preparation procedure which was used for previous (sodium oleate-
treated) samples was applied. First, paraffin was melted on a hot plate. Octadecylamine was added
to liquid paraffin wax (Fig.1-F). Surfactant to nanoparticle mass ratio was chosen to be 2.5:1 [10].
Upon magnetic stirring for half an hour, MWCNTs at 0.1 wt.% was dispersed into paraffin wax-
surfactant emulsion. Magnetic stirring kept going on for another half an hour. Then, obtained
Pictures taken after sample preparation showed a well dispersed stable nanocompositions
as shown in Fig 10. The precipitation did not take place upon solidification of the samples at room
stability worsened over thermal cycles as the sodium oleate treated-MWCNTs samples in previous
study. The same pattern applies to octadecylamine treated aluminum oxide and graphene
nanoparticles. Regardless of nanoparticle type and shape, nanoparticles tend to deposit on the
proved that MWCNT-paraffin samples could not maintain the dispersion quality over cycles.
Boundary conditions could affect the dispersion quality of nanoparticles within NEPCMs during
heating and cooling. With this idea in mind, thermal cycles were run by placing the sample on a
14
hot plate at 150C for melting and leaving the sample at ambient room temperature for
solidification. Prior to conducting melting-solidification cycles, new sample was prepared using
the same concentration MWCNT (0.1wt.%) with octadecylamine (1:10 ratio to nanoparticle).
After adding specified amount of MWCNT and octadecylamine, magnetic stirring was done for
1h and it was followed by sonication for 1h at %30 amplitude . After that, the sample was left to
Visual observation revealed that heating the sample from the bottom resulted in natural
currents preventing MWCNTs from settling due to constant motion of particles. Highly dense
region of MWCNTs at the bottom expands and becomes less dense due to heating. Therefore, it
rises above the colder region of MWCNT-paraffin wax. As the hotter solution gets further away
from the heat source, it starts to cool down and become denser. Then, it starts to sink again. The
whole process of rising and falling keeps the MWCNTs in motion. The dispersion quality is much
better than the previous study where there is a clear separation of MWCNTs settling at the bottom
As can be seen from Fig.12, the sample seemed to be stable after melting on the hot plate
for 2h. No separation was observed between MWCNT and paraffin region in liquid phase due to
promoted natural convection after each cycle. However, agglomerated regions started to form with
the onset of solidification. Observing clustered regions became difficult due to darkening color as
4.Conclusions
The effect of temperature, nanoparticle content on the thermal conductivity was investigated.
Several measurements both in solid and liquid phases were made. Thermal conductivity of
15
NEPCMs were found to be temperature dependent. Increasing nanoparticle content resulted in
associated with the lack of dispersion quality. Therefore, the measurements did not really represent
the concentrations stated. The main reason is that particle concentration in the measurement region
The first part of the stability study revealed the inadequacy of mechanical dispersion methods,
particularly sonication, for providing long term stable samples. Stability of MWCNT-paraffin wax
samples became worse regardless of nanoparticle content and sonication time over melting-
dispersion methods namely stirring and sonication are not sufficient to achieve long term stability
of MWCNT-paraffin NEPCMs.
Having found out the ineffectiveness of sonication, a new approach in sample preparation was
taken. Sodium oleate surfactant(anionic) and octadecylamine were used along with stirring and
along with MWCNTs having planar, spherical and tubular structure respectively were analyzed in
terms of precipitation and stability. Melting -solidification cycles presented the deterioration in
stability due to great agglomeration for MWCNTs and Aluminum oxide. However, the dispersion
of graphene platelets was better than the other two nanoparticles. This could be attributed to the
planary 2-D structure of graphene particles. Nevertheless, the significant deposition of graphene
The effect of boundary conditions during melting and solidification is another significant factor
on the dispersion and movement of nanoparticles. It has been shown that uniform heating in
16
agglomeration. So, changing boundary conditions during heating and cooling was thought to
change the way the nanoparticles move and settle. For instance, heating the MWWCNT-paraffin
wax sample from the bottom contributed to the initiation of convection currents carrying
nanoparticles from bottom to the top helping achieve uniform dispersion. It was shown that heating
the sample from the bottom certainly helped obtain more stable suspension after fully melting.
However, changing the way the sample heated did not prevent MWCNT particles from
Stability issue raises the question of reliability of thermal property measurements. For instance,
the thermal conductivity measurements made right after sample preparation when the samples are
at most stable state with perfect dispersion do not provide a realistic performance enhancement.
The reason for this notion is that the nanoparticle deposition and agglomeration are usually not
considered even though some researchers claim that agglomeration also contributes to thermal
conductivity enhancement[27]. The thermal conductivity improvement that was obtained should
be compared with the measurements after melting-solidification cycles. Another debatable point
is that the DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimeter) analysis is usually done by researchers to
indicate whether any change in phase change temperature and latent heat of fusion takes place
after cooling and heating cycles. The reliability and consistency of NEPCMs are based on this
study. However, tiny amount of samples used in DSC analysis do not present the real situation
It can be concluded that stability of NEPCMs remains to be an unresolved issue. There are many
parameters involved in the particle stability for colloidal. Finding out the effect of each parameters
and the optimum conditions seems to be the key to achieve stable NEPCMs. Researchers should
focus more on achieving reliable, stable NEPCM that could perform steadily for many cycles in
17
latent heat storage systems rather than the abnormal thermal property improvements, particularly
thermal conductivity, without any solid reasoning. It is undebatable that collaboration is a must if
any significant progress is to be made. Usage of chemicals, the compatibility of nanoparticles and
the base fluid and how they interact with each other in terms of heat transfer and particle dispersion
are some of the multi-disciplinary aspects of the NEPCM study. Researchers from material
science, engineering, chemistry and physics should contribute all together to obtain the best
References
1. Dincer I, Rosen M.A.,2011, Thermal energy storage: systems and applications, Wiley.
2. Kenisarin, M. and Mahkamov, K. 2007, Solar energy storage using phase change materials,
3. Khodadadi J. M., Fan L., and Babaei H. 2013, Thermal conductivity enhancement of
energy storage: A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., Vol. (24), pp. 418444.
4. Das S.K., Choi S.U.S,Yu W. and Pradeep T., Nanofluids Science and Technology,2008, John
Wiley.
5. Fan L., Fang X., Wang X., Zeng Y., Xiao Y., Yu Z., Xu X., and Y. Hu 2013, Effects of
various carbon nanofillers on the thermal conductivity and energy storage properties of
paraffin-based nanocomposite phase change materials, Applied Energy, Vol. (110), pp. 163
172.
18
6. Angayarkanni S.A. and Philip J. 2015, Thermal conductivity measurements in phase change
(118), 094306.
7. R. J. Warzoha and A. S. Fleischer, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer Improved
heat recovery from paraffin-based phase change materials due to the presence of percolating
graphene networks, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 79, pp. 314323, 2014.
8. Wang J., Xie, H., and Xin, Z. 2009, Thermal properties of paraffin based composites
containing multi-walled carbon nanotubes, Thermochimica Acta, Vol. (488), pp. 3942.
9. Kumaresan V., Velraj R., and Das S. K. 2012, The effect of carbon nanotubes in enhancing
the thermal transport properties of PCM during solidification, Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. (48),
pp. 13451355.
10. Tang Q, Sun J., Yu S., and G. Wang 2014, Improving thermal conductivity and decreasing
supercooling of paraffin phase change materials by carbon nanotubes, RSC Advances., Vol.
11. Z. Yu, Fang X., Fan L., Wang X., Xiao Y., Zeng Y., Xu X., Hu Y., and Cen K. 2012, Increased
12. S.Y. Wu, Tong X., Nie C.D., Peng D.Q., S. G. Gong, and Wang Z. Q. 2016, The effects of
various carbon nanofillers on the thermal properties of paraffin for energy storage
applications, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, Vol. (124), pp. 181188.
19
13. L. Fan, Z. Zhu, Y. Zeng, Q. Lu, and Z. Yu, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Heat transfer during melting of graphene-based composite phase change materials heated from
below, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 79, pp. 94104, 2014.
14. J. Wang, H. Xie, and Y. Li, PW based phase change nanocomposites containing -Al2O3, pp.
709713, 2010.
emulsion as phase change material , Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 36, no. 5, pp.
467470, 2009.
for the Thermal, vol. 130, no. April 2008, pp. 18, 2015.
17. S. Wu, D. Zhu, X. Zhang, and J. Huang, Preparation and melting/freezing characteristics of
Cu/paraffin nanofluid as phase-change material (PCM), Energy and Fuels, vol. 24, no. 3, pp.
18941898, 2010.
18. Y. Zeng, L. Fan, Y. Xiao, Z. Yu, and K. Cen, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
NePCMs ) in a bottom-heated vertical cylindrical cavity, vol. 66, pp. 111117, 2013.
19. D. H. Choi, J. Lee, H. Hong, and Y. T. Kang, Science Direct Thermal conductivity and heat
20
20. J. Wang, H. Xie, and Z. Xin, Preparation and Thermal Properties of Grafted CNTs
Composites, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 233238, 2011.
21. S. Zhang, J. Wu, C. Tse, and J. Niu, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells Effective dispersion
decrease of supercooling, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, vol. 96, pp. 124130, 2012.
22. R. Zheng, J. Gao, J. Wang, and G. Chen, and thermal conductivity using liquid solid phase
change materials with high thermal conductivity based on paraffin / graphene oxide
phase change material ( NCPCM ) using sodium stearoyl lactylate ( SSL ) as the surfactant and
evaluation of its stability using image analysis, Renew. Energy, vol. 93, pp. 404411, 2016.
25. Digital Sonifier Models 250 & 450 Users Manual, Branson Ultrasonics Corportation.
26. M. Kamalgharibi, F. Hormozi, S.A.H. Zamzamian, and M.M. Sarafraz 2015 Experimental
studies on the stability of CuO nanoparticles dispersed in different base fluids: influence of
stirring, sonication and surface active agents Heat Mass Transfer, Vol (50), pp. 5562,
21
List of figures
Figure 3: Thermal conductivity change in liquid phase over time right after sample preparation
Figure 4: 3-D printed mold for thermal conductivity measurements in solid phase
Figure.5: Picture of each sample after being extracted from the mold
Figure 6: Thermal conductivity change with temperature right after sample preparation
Figure 7: DSC heating and cooling curves of paraffin wax with MWCNT, graphene
Figure 10: Stability observation of various nanoparticles in paraffin wax with sodium oleate
Figure 11: Stability observation of various nanoparticles in paraffin wax with octadecylamine
Figure 12: Solidification of 0.02%wt. MWCNT-Paraffin sample after melting on a hot plate at
150C
22
Table 1: DSC results of nanoparticle dispersed paraffin wax samples (Tm,peak:peak melting
23
A B C D E F
24
Figure 3: Thermal conductivity change in liquid phase over time right after sample preparation
Figure 4: 3-D printed mold for thermal conductivity measurements in solid phase
25
Figure.5: Picture of each sample after being extracted from the mold
Figure 6: Thermal conductivity change with temperature right after sample preparation
26
Figure 7: DSC heating and cooling curves of paraffin wax with MWCNT, graphene
27
Figure.9: Settling of MWCNTs in paraffin wax in solid phase
Figure 10: Stability observation of various nanoparticles in paraffin wax with sodium oleate
28
Figure 11: Stability observation of various nanoparticles in paraffin wax with octadecylamine
29
Figure 12: Solidification of 0.02%wt. MWCNT-Paraffin sample after melting on a hot plate at
150C
30