Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Correspondence
kdorshki@mednet.ucla.edu
In Brief
B lymphopoiesis is often considered a
linear process that initiates in the fetus
and continues in postnatal bone marrow.
Montecino-Rodriguez et al. show that B-1
and B-2 development occurs in distinct,
differentially regulated fetal and adult
waves, indicating an unappreciated
complexity in the development of the
humoral immune system.
Article
*Correspondence: kdorshki@mednet.ucla.edu
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2016.07.012
SUMMARY Ye et al., 2005). Such results are difficult to reconcile with tradi-
tional schemes of hematopoiesis depicting B cell development
B cell development is often depicted as a linear pro- as a linear process that initiates in the fetus and continues in
cess initiating in the fetus and continuing postnatally. the bone marrow (BM) after birth. Instead, these observations
Using a PU.1 hypomorphic mouse model, we found are consistent with suggestions that the regulation of lympho-
that B-1 and B-2 lymphopoiesis occurred in distinct cyte development is not uniform throughout development (Kin-
fetal and adult waves differentially dependent on cade et al., 2002; Rothenberg and Dionne, 2002).
Differences in the transcriptional regulation of fetal and adult B
the Sfpi1 14 kB upstream regulatory element. The
cell development are particularly well illustrated by studies of
initial wave of fetal B-1 development was absent
mice that do not express PU.1, a pioneer transcription factor
in PU.1 hypomorphic mice, while subsequent fetal expressed in HSCs and their progeny (Heinz et al., 2010). This
and adult waves emerged. In contrast, B-2 lympho- E-twenty-six (Ets) family member is expressed in hematopoietic
poiesis occurred in distinct fetal and adult waves. cells and regulates B lymphopoiesis through its ability to induce
Whole-transcriptome profiling of fetal and adult B the expression of other transcription factors, cytokine receptors,
cell progenitors supported the existence of three and various lineage-specific cell-surface determinants (Dakic
waves of B-1 and two waves of B-2 development et al., 2007; DeKoter et al., 2002, 2007). It was originally thought
and revealed that the network of transcription factors that all B lymphopoiesis was blocked in mice with a deletion of
governing B lineage specification and commitment Sfpi1, the gene that encodes PU.1, but further studies indicated
was highly divergent between B-1 and B-2 progeni- that limited fetal B lymphopoiesis occurred in PU.1-deficient
strains (Ye et al., 2005). The cells produced were B-1 B cells, a
tors. These findings support the view that the B-1
population of innate-like effectors generated most efficiently in
and B-2 lineages are distinct and provide a genetic
the fetus, which respond to pathogens like encapsulated bac-
basis for layering of immune system development. teria (Alugupalli et al., 2004; Baumgarth, 2011). In contrast, few
if any B-2 B cells, which participate in adaptive immune re-
sponses, were produced. Similarly, a PU.1 hypomorphic strain,
INTRODUCTION generated by deleting an upstream regulatory element (URE)
located 14 kb from the Sfpi1 transcription start site, exhibited
The development of the different hematopoietic lineages is normal numbers of B-1 B cells and a severe depletion of B-2
dependent on the expression of specific transcription factors B cells (Rosenbauer et al., 2006). B-1 and B-2 B cells have
in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and immature, uncommitted been proposed to be distinct lineages (Herzenberg, 2000; Kantor
progenitors at specific times during development (Orkin and and Herzenberg, 1993), and these observations provide prelim-
Zon, 2008). The transcriptional regulation of B lymphopoiesis is inary, genetic evidence in support of this hypothesis.
well defined, and studies of genetically engineered mice have Models hypothesizing the existence of multiple waves of B-1 B
made it possible to identify the hierarchy of factors required cell development have been proposed, with the initial wave initi-
for the emergence of lymphoid-specified progenitors from ating prior to the emergence of definitive HSCs (Montecino-Ro-
HSCs and their commitment to the B cell lineage (Busslinger, driguez and Dorshkind, 2012; Yoshimoto et al., 2011, 2015). In
2004; Dakic et al., 2007; Hagman and Lukin, 2006; Rothenberg, contrast, B-2 lymphopoiesis is depicted as occurring in a single
2014). However, these studies often revealed that lack of expres- wave that initiates in fetal liver (FL) subsequent to the emergence
sion of a particular transcription factor differentially affects fetal of HSCs and continuing in adult BM following their migration to
and adult B lymphopoiesis (Nutt et al., 1997; Reya et al., 2000; that tissue (Hardy et al., 2007). We reasoned that dissecting
Immunity 45, 527539, September 20, 2016 2016 Elsevier Inc. 527
B lymphopoiesis in the Sfpi1 14 kb URE-deficient (URED/D) mice
might provide evidence that B-1 B cells develop in multiple
waves and further elucidate differences between the transcrip-
tional regulation of fetal and adult B cell development. These
mice are viable (Rosenbauer et al., 2006) in contrast to strains
with a germline deletion of PU.1 that die in utero or soon after
birth (McKercher et al., 1996; Scott et al., 1994). While adult
B cell development is attenuated in URED/D mice (Rosenbauer
et al., 2006), the status of fetal B lymphopoiesis in that strain
has not been reported.
Here, we show that this approach, combined with analysis of
the transcriptomes of fetal and adult B-1 and B-2 progenitors,
provided genetic evidence for the existence of three waves of
B-1 and, surprisingly, two waves of B-2 B cell production and
demonstrated a role for PU.1 dosage in regulating B lymphocyte
production within and between these waves. In addition to
establishing that the regulation of B lymphopoiesis is not uniform
throughout development, our comprehensive analysis of the B-1
and B-2 progenitor transcriptomes showed that expression of
the core network of transcription factors that orchestrate B-1
and B-2 B cell specification and commitment was distinct,
supporting the hypothesis that these B cell subsets represent
distinct lineages.
RESULTS
preferentially generated B-1 lineage cells (Figures 3E and 3F). Therefore, we determined if IL-7Ra was expressed on fetal
These results indicated that the few B cell progenitors present URED/D cells at any time during gestation. While CD127 is ex-
in the BM of young adult URED/D mice (Figure 3D) were B-1 spec- pressed on Lin CD117lowSca-1lowCD127+ B6 CLPs as
ified and provide further evidence that IL-7Ra expression is early as E13.5, CD127+ CLPs were not detected in URED/D
essential for B-2 lymphopoiesis (Carvalho et al., 2001; Sitnicka mice at this age (Figures 4A4D). However, low numbers of
et al., 2003; Vosshenrich et al., 2003). The data also raised the Lin CD117lowSca-1lowCD127+ cells were transiently detected
possibility that the FO, MZ, and peritoneal B-2 B cells present between E15.5 and birth in URED/D FL (Figures 4B4D). This
in adult URED/D mice (Figures 3A and 3B) were generated during result raised the possibility that a fetal wave of B-2 lympho-
an earlier wave of development. poiesis was intact in URED/D mice. To test this, we cultured
Lin CD117+Sca-1+CD150 and Lin CD117lowSca-1lowCD127+ gence of the latter wave was dependent on the 14 kb URE.
cells isolated from E15.5 URED/D FL in our in vitro assay and The results further suggested that the two waves were not
observed that, in contrast to their adult BM counterparts, they equally dependent on PU.1. Subsequent qPCR analyses, which
generated B-2 lineage cells (Figure 4E). revealed that Sfpi1 levels were extremely low in fetal and
The above results defined the existence of fetal and adult neonatal B-2 cell progenitors compared to their adult B-2 coun-
waves of B-2 B cell development and demonstrated that emer- terparts, provided support for this hypothesis (Figure 4F). We
Figure 5. Whole-Transcriptome Profiling Reveals Differences in the Genetic Signatures of B-1 and B-2 Progenitors
(A) Principal component analysis of Lin CD93+CD19+CD45R /low B-1 (B-1 pro) and Lin CD93+CD19 CD45R+CD43+ B-2 (B-2 pro) progenitors from fetal (E15.5;
pool of n = 25, 3 litters), neonatal (d2; pool of n = 46, 6 litters), and adult (911 wk; 2 independent groups, n = 8 and n = 5) B6 mice.
(BF) (B) Expression heatmaps of core B cell transcription factors in fetal, neonatal, and adult B-1 and B-2 progenitors. Expression heatmaps for the target genes
of (C) Ebf1, (D) Foxo1, (E) Pax5, and (F) Tcf3(E2a) in fetal, neonatal, and adult B-1 and B-2 progenitors (log2 fold-change > 2). The color scale indicates Z scores.
The complete gene lists are included in Table S1. B-1 and B-2 progenitors were purified from fetal or adult mice as indicated in (A).
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Dakic, A., Wu, L., and Nutt, S.L. (2007). Is PU.1 a dosage-sensitive regulator of
haemopoietic lineage commitment and leukaemogenesis? Trends Immunol.
Supplemental Information includes five figures and three tables and can 28, 108114.
be found with this article online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2016. de Andres, B., Gonzalo, P., Minguet, S., Martnez-Marin, J.A., Soro, P.G.,
07.012. Marcos, M.A., and Gaspar, M.L. (2002). The first 3 days of B-cell development
in the mouse embryo. Blood 100, 40744081.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS DeKoter, R.P., Lee, H.J., and Singh, H. (2002). PU.1 regulates expression of
the interleukin-7 receptor in lymphoid progenitors. Immunity 16, 297309.
E.M.-R. and M.F. designed and performed experiments, D.C. performed the DeKoter, R.P., Schweitzer, B.L., Kamath, M.B., Jones, D., Tagoh, H., Bonifer,
bioinformatics analyses, B.B.-M. made cDNA libraries and conducted PCR C., Hildeman, D.A., and Huang, K.J. (2007). Regulation of the interleukin-7 re-
reactions, C.L.B. and M.F. maintained the mouse colony, and E.M.-R. and ceptor alpha promoter by the Ets transcription factors PU.1 and GA-binding
K.D. designed experiments and wrote the manuscript. protein in developing B cells. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 1419414204.
Esplin, B.L., Welner, R.S., Zhang, Q., Borghesi, L.A., and Kincade, P.W. (2009).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A differentiation pathway for B1 cells in adult bone marrow. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 106, 57735778.
This work was supported by NIH grant AI021256 (K.D.). The Jonsson Compre-
Ghosn, E.E., Sadate-Ngatchou, P., Yang, Y., Herzenberg, L.A., and
hensive Cancer Center flow core is supported by NIH grants CA16042 and
Herzenberg, L.A. (2011). Distinct progenitors for B-1 and B-2 cells are present
AI28697.
in adult mouse spleen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 28792884.
Ghosn, E.E., Yamamoto, R., Hamanaka, S., Yang, Y., Herzenberg, L.A.,
Received: February 2, 2016
Nakauchi, H., and Herzenberg, L.A. (2012). Distinct B-cell lineage commitment
Revised: May 13, 2016
distinguishes adult bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Accepted: June 8, 2016
Sci. USA 109, 53945398.
Published: August 23, 2016
Hagman, J., and Lukin, K. (2006). Transcription factors drive B cell develop-
REFERENCES ment. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 18, 127134.
Hardy, R.R., Kincade, P.W., and Dorshkind, K. (2007). The protean nature of
Alugupalli, K.R., Leong, J.M., Woodland, R.T., Muramatsu, M., Honjo, T., and cells in the B lymphocyte lineage. Immunity 26, 703714.
Gerstein, R.M. (2004). B1b lymphocytes confer T cell-independent long-last- Heinz, S., Benner, C., Spann, N., Bertolino, E., Lin, Y.C., Laslo, P., Cheng, J.X.,
ing immunity. Immunity 21, 379390. Murre, C., Singh, H., and Glass, C.K. (2010). Simple combinations of lineage-
Barber, C.L., Montecino-Rodriguez, E., and Dorshkind, K. (2011). Reduced determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for
production of B-1-specified common lymphoid progenitors results in dimin- macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576589.
Supplemental Information
2.0 URE /+
Cells x 106
3
URE /
1.5
2
1.0
1
0.5
0 0.0
B-1 B-1
C 20 D 0.25
URE +/+ URE +/+
Frequency [%]
URE /+
0.20 URE /+
15
Cells x 106
URE / URE /
0.15
10
0.10
5
0.05
0 0.00
+
CD11b B-2 CD11b+ B-2
Figure S1. Frequency and number of splenic B-1 B cells and peritoneal cavity CD11b+ myeloid and B-2 B
cells in URE +/+, URE/+ and URE/ mice. Related to Figures 1 and 3. (A) Frequency and (B) number
SEM of B-1 B cells determined by flow cytometry in the spleen of 6-8 week old URE +/+ (n=6), URE/+ (n=10)
and URE/ (n=7) mice. B-1 cells were defined as CD23CD21/low CD93 sIgMhigh cells. significant
differences were observed between groups following analysis with a two tailed unpaired Students t test ( = 0.05).
(C) Frequency and (D) number SEM of myeloid and B-2 B cells determined by flow cytometry in the peritoneal
cavity of 6-8 week old URE +/+ (n=6), URE/+ (n=10) and URE/ (n=7) mice. Myeloid cells were defined as
CD11b+sIgM and B-2 B cells as CD23+ sIgM+/low cells. significant differences were observed between groups
following analysis with a two tailed unpaired Students t test ( = 0.05).
B-1
CD45R(B220)
B-2
CD93
CD19
Figure S2. Representative flow cytometry plots depicting the immunostaining and gating strategy used to
purify Lin CD93+ CD19+ CD45R/low B-1 and Lin CD93+ CD19 CD45R+ CD43+ B-2 B cell progenitors.
Related to Figure 2. Data from cells harvested from the livers of two day old B6 neonatal mice (n=12). Sorting
gates, which were set conservatively, are indicated in color and arrows indicate sub-gated populations.
A Progenitors
9-13 days
CD19
Frequency [%]
FO URE +/+
Cells x 106
30
24.9 1.7 20
CD23
20
10
10
0 0
FO MZ B-1 FO MZ B-1
CD21
C B6 D
30 B6
B cells URE +/+
9.5 3.0
Frequency [%]
CD45R(B220)
20
10
0
pro-B pre-B B
IgM
4
pre-B
15.0 5.7
CD45R(B220)
pro-B 3
Cells x 106
2.8 0.6
2
0
pro-B pre-B B
CD43
Figure S4. B lymphopoiesis is similar in adult B6 and URE +/+ mice. Related to Figure 3. (A) Representative
plots depicting the immunostaining strategy used to determine the frequency of follicular (FO) B cells in the spleen
of 6 week old B6 mice. Values within gates indicate mean SEM. (B) Frequency and number SEM of FO,
Marginal Zone (MZ), and B-1 B cells in the spleen of 6 week old B6 (n=6) and URE +/+ (n=6) mice. (C)
Representative plots depicting the immunostaining strategy used to determine the frequency of pro-B, pre-B, and B
cells in the bone marrow of 6 week old B6 mice. Values within gates indicate mean SEM. (D) Frequency and
number SEM of pro-B, pre-B, and B cells in the bone marrow of 6 week old B6 (n=6) and URE +/+ (n=6) mice.
significant differences were observed between groups following analysis with a two tailed unpaired Students t
test ( = 0.05).
A C 0.4
0.1
MPP HSC 0.1 0.1
0.122 0.038 0.172 0.033 0.094 0.020
0.044 0.012 0.029 0.006 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.019 0.006
20 30
30 B6 B6
0.05 15
HSC Frequency [%]
URE +/+ 0 0 0
HSC Cells x 103
0.00 0 0.4
0.5 0.5
0.2
0.25 50
MPP Frequency [%]
URE /+
0.20 40
URE / 50 60
B6 100 B6 B6
0.05 10 20 40
20
0.00 0 10 20
0 0 0
E14.5 E15.5 E18.5
E 6-8wk URE +/+ 6-8wk URE /+ 6-8wk URE / F
p=0.0001 p=0.0015
0.04 8
URE +/+
p=0.059
0.03 6
URE / URE /
CD117
0.02 4
0.044 0.050 0.059
0.012 0.010 0.0112 0.01 2
Sca-1
Figure S5. Frequency and number of HSCs, MPPs and CLPs in URE/ mice. Related to Figure 4. (A)
Representative plots depicting the immunostaining strategy used to determine the frequency of LinCD117+Sca-
1+CD150+ HSCs and LinCD117+Sca-1+CD150 MPPs in the bone marrow of 6-8 week old URE +/+ (n=6),
URE/+ (n=6) and URE/ (n=4) mice. Values within gates indicate mean SEM. (B) Frequency and number
SEM of HSCs and MPPs in the bone marrow of 6-8 week old URE +/+ (n=6), URE/+ (n=6) and URE/ (n=4)
mice. (C) Frequency and number SEM of HSCs in B6 and URE/ fetal liver at the indicated embryonic ages.
Pools of fetal liver cells included 5-12 embryos for each strain of mice at each indicated age. (D) Frequency and
number SEM of MPPs in and B6 and URE/ fetal liver at the indicated embryonic ages. Pools of fetal liver cells
included 5-12 embryos for each strain of mice at each indicated age. (E) Representative plots depicting the
immunostaining strategy used to determine the frequency of LinCD117lowSca-1low CLPs in the bone marrow of 6-8
week old URE +/+ (n=6), URE/+ (n=6) and URE/ (n=4) mice. Values within gates indicate mean SEM. (F)
Frequency and number SEM of LinCD117lowSca-1lowCD127+ CLPs in the bone marrow of 6-8 week old URE
+/+ (n=6), URE/+ (n=6) and URE/ (n=4) mice. Differences between groups were compared using a two ailed
unpaired Students t test ( = 0.05). p values are indicated.
Table S1. RNA-Seq expression estimates for genes differentially expressed in LinCD93+CD19+CD45R/low B-
1 (B-1 pro) and LinCD93+CD19CD45R+CD43+ B-2 (B-2 pro) progenitors. Related to Figure 5. Cell
populations were purified from fetal (E15.5; pool of 25 embryos pooled from 3 litters), neonatal (d2; pool of 46
embryos from 6 litters), and adult (9-11 wk; 2 independent groups, n=8 and n=5), of B6 mice. Columns 1 through 3
indicate Gene identifications and descriptions. Columns 4 through 9 indicate the average RNA-Seq expression
estimates in units of FPKMs.
Table S2. Gene classification using Bayesian polytomous model selection in LinCD93+CD19+CD45R/low B-1
(B-1 pro) and LinCD93+CD19CD45R+CD43+ B-2 (B-2 pro) progenitors. Related to Figure 6. Columns 1
through 3 indicate Gene identifications and descriptions. Cell populations were purified from fetal (E15.5; pool of
25 embryos pooled from 3 litters), neonatal (d2; pool of 46 embryos from 6 litters), and adult (9-11 wk; 2
independent groups, n=8 and n=5), of B6 mice. Columns 4 through 6 indicate the average RNA-Seq expression
estimates in units of FPKMs
Table S3. Antibodies used for immunostaining using flow cytometry. Related to Figures 1, 2 , 3 and 4. The
antibody, clone and source are indicated. Optimal working dilutions of all antibodies were determined before use.
Each of the adult pools of B-1 and B-2 progenitors were independently profiled and analyzed as biological
replicates and the average estimated expression was used for values in tables and heatmaps. We divided each of our
fetal and neonatal libraries and the material was independently sequenced in two lanes so as to obtain technical
replicates. Libraries were sequenced at high depth (~40-50 million total reads per sample).
The RNA-seq reads were aligned to the mouse genome but the counts matrix was restricted to protein-coding genes
only. This ensured that ribosomal contamination or over-abundance of mitochondrial genes did not affect our
downstream analysis. Across our sequencing dataset, protein-coding genes accounted for approximately 80% of the
total sequencing. All statistical tests and heatmap clustering in the manuscript were performed after between-
samples, global normalization, which provides a robust setting for target identification. Expression estimates in
supplementary tables and throughout the manuscript are reported in units of FPKMs. Binomial statistics were used
for the analysis of sequencing count data. Because the availability of biological replicates is required for the
estimation of the mean/variance relationship, we estimated this relationship using the biological replicates from the
adult samples and used of it for all the statistical tests. Finally, we employed different computational approaches to
answer specific questions. Principal component analysis was obtained from variance-stabilized data for all genes,
without filtering, in order to reflect the entire transcriptional signature of all populations (and not only for regulated
or manually selected genes). These data were used for all clusters and heatmaps. Global differences between the B-1
and B-2 compartments were obtained from pair-wise comparisons using negative binomial statistics and a
mean/variance relationship estimated from true biological replicates (as explained above). However, in order to
identify genes developmentally regulated in each compartment, we chose to model the data from the 3
developmental stages within the same 3-ways Bayesian model. Similarly, the variance was estimated using true
biological replicates from the adult samples. Bayesian modeling was applied under stringent conditions.
Supplemental References
Bhargava, V., Head, S.R., Ordoukanian, P., Mercola, M., Subramaniam, S. (2014). Technical variations in low-
input RNA-seq methodologies. Sci Rep 4:3678.