Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
consumed by people. This practice has increasingly become shrouded in a tug of war, with the
public as proponents to its discontinuation, and research and government agencies as its supporters.
Develop New Systems for Experiments, Ericson (2014) in The Price of Killing Off Animal
Testing, and Rowan (2011) in Avoiding Animal Testing discuss the animal testing issue. The
problem of animal testing is a multi-faceted one, with ethical, needful and functional, and political
Animal testing is a heated issue due to the ethical implications tied to it. A key aspect of
the debate involves drawing the line between animals and people. Ericson (2014) touches on this
subject by stating that although people do not hesitate when eliminating pests and infections, the
public begins to grow wary as the organism starts to manifest human-like qualities. Another facet
to the ethical implications involves how animals experience trauma like humans. Cohn (2010)
mentions how studies performed on chimpanzees show that these animals experience pain and
discomfort, in addition to post traumatic disorder. Although animal experimentation has always
trodden in treacherous terrain due to its ethical woes, its usefulness and essentiality render it a
prevalent practice.
Researchers are starting to move away from animal testing due to concerns with
functionality, but they also remain steadfast on its necessity. Because of the aforementioned
functionality issue, the research community has been abandoning in vivo experimentation. Cohn
(2010) and Rowan (2011) discuss how mainstream researchers have begun to adhere to a strict
reduction, refinement, and elimination of animal use in science and how professional research
proposing minimized animal use instead of completely forsaking it is a more sensible approach.
The author also cites how stopping animal experimentation would greatly hinder research on
abandoning of animal testing and the publics resounding unrest regarding the practice, the federal
Animal testing has been procuring political attention in the form of policy making and
regulation. Policies to reduce the animal toll in research and product approval have begun to arise.
Cohn (2010) and Rowan (2011) touch on how government agencies have started to research non-
animal testing and have moved on to cooperate to develop new, modern practices to change
product testing. Although the public has been welcoming these policies, there has been some
opposition from the research community to some pro-animal regulations. Ericson (2014) cites how
a professional research society directly opposed the Great Ape Protection and Cost Savings Act, a
In conclusion, animal testing is complex issue, with various facets regarding its ethics,
necessity, functionality, and politics. There has been a growing abandoning of animal testing in
recent years, with the public pushing for its complete elimination and research communities
proposing its minimized use. Government agencies have responded to this trend by proposing and
developing policies to regulate animal use in product testing. There appears to be a universal
understanding that animal use is an obsolete form of testing, with newer technologies offering
better alternatives.
Edwin J. Alvarado-Rodriguez SYNTHESIS ESSAY
FIRST DRAFT 2017-10-19
Edwin J. Alvarado-Rodriguez SYNTHESIS ESSAY
FIRST DRAFT 2017-10-19
References
Cohn, M. (2010, August 26). Alternatives to animal testing gaining ground. The Baltimore Sun.
20100826_1_animal-testing-animal-welfare-act-researchers
Ericson, J. (2014, February 20). The price of killing off animal testing. Newsweek. Retrieved from:
http://www.newsweek.com/2014/02/21/price-killing-animal-testing-245548.html
Rowan, A. (2011, December 1). Avoiding animal testing. Scientist. Retrieved from:
http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/31401/title/Avoiding-Animal-
Testing/