Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Performed by:
Rebecca Watson
Abstract
Soil respiration can be studied by collecting data on the changes in carbon and nitrogen
over a period of time. Soils with a pH greater than 6 will have a higher mass of carbon removed
with added material such as alfalfa or sawdust. The objective of this study is to evaluate the
differences in the mass of carbon removed as well as the nitrate concentrations for five different
soil series with added material to the soil. The changes that occur during soil respiration were
investigated using several mason jars that were prepared and allowed to incubate for one month.
On the final day of incubation, the jars were opened and the use of titration determined the
amount of carbon lost while the remaining soil was tested for nitrate concentrations. It was
observed that the Glenelg series, although it had the second highest pH, released 0.864 grams of
carbon with added sawdust and 0.138 grams with added alfalfa. The highest average release of
carbon was from the control jars that contained only soil from each series and released 0.0165
grams of carbon and had a 22.5 mg/L concentration of nitrate. It was observed that the highest
changes occurred in the soil series that had a pH greater than 6. Overall, soil respiration should
be studied in order to understand how much the soils add to the atmospheric carbon flux.
Introduction
Respiration is a key function to nearly all living things. The process can be defined as the
uptake of oxygen while releasing carbon at the same time (Pell et al., 2005). Soil respiration is a
key process for the atmospheric carbon flux and soil water content as well as oxygen
concentrations and bioavailability of carbon are the main factors that influence and regulate soil
3
Soil Respiration and Nitrogen Transformation Analysis
respiration (Pell et al., 2005). Soil respiration can be defined as the release of carbon dioxide
from soils from the production of carbon dioxide by the roots and soil organisms (Lloyd and
Taylor, 1994). Along with the release of carbon dioxide from the soils, nitrogen found in the
on soil mineralization are generally motivated by the need for rapid and reliable methods of
assessing soil nitrogen availability and therefore incubation time was limited to a minimum of 7-
14 days rather than allowing the soils to incubate for a full 28 days (Stanford and Smith, 1972).
To get reliable data on nitrogen mineralization, a full incubation time should be required.
Nitrogen immobilization is the conversion back to organic nitrogen from nitrate or ammonium.
Nitrogen immobilization is greatly limited by substrate availability within the soil and studies
conducted across the U.S. proved this point (Barrett and Burke, 2000). Soils with a pH greater
than 6 will have a higher mass of carbon removed with added material such as alfalfa or sawdust.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the differences in the mass of carbon removed as well
as the nitrate concentrations for five different soil series with added material to the soil.
Methods
The study was conducted on five different soil samples over the span of three weeks as
the jars used needed to incubate for that amount of time. Four mason jars were set up for each
sample for the study, three of which contained 50 grams of soil. Of those three, one contained
soil and 0.5 grams of sawdust, another contained soil and 0.5 grams of alfalfa, and the last
contained only soil. The jar that contained no soil was used as a blank for the study. The jars that
contained soil had deionized water added to them and were mixed thoroughly. In four test tubes,
20 mL of 2M NaOH were added and the test tubes were placed into each jar. After the test tubes
4
Soil Respiration and Nitrogen Transformation Analysis
were placed, the lids were secured tightly and the jars were placed in a designated drawer and
allowed to incubate for three weeks. The jars were opened every few days to replenish the
At the end of the three week incubation period, the test tube was taken from each jar and
the contents were poured into an Erlenmeyer flask. To the flask, 25 mL of 1M BaCl2 was added
as well as phenolphthalein drops and the flask was swirled. The solution was titrated with HCl
until the colorless endpoint was reached and the solution was checked using a few more drops of
phenolphthalein to ensure the endpoint was reached. The procedure was repeated for the
remaining incubation jars noting each time how much HCl was needed to reach the endpoint. For
each treatment, the mass of carbon lost from the soil sample was calculated using the number of
moles of NaOH added at the beginning of the study and the volume of HCl added during the
titration. When needed, the blank was used to correct the calculated data before being converted
to the mass of carbon released. Deionized water was added to the soil left in each jar and the
resulting solution was tested for nitrate concentrations using nitrate test strips.
Results
The soil samples used for this study had many varying factors, such as pH and cation
exchange capacity, that made for differences in the data collected during the study (Table 1). The
series with the highest pH was the Duffield series and had a pH of 7.15 (Table 1). The series
with the lowest pH was the Matawan series with a pH of 4.44 (Table 1). After the study was
conducted, each soil sample showed a variation in the mass of carbon released as well as the
nitrate concentration (Table 2). The Glenelg series had the highest mass of carbon lost for both
5
Soil Respiration and Nitrogen Transformation Analysis
the samples containing sawdust, 0.864 grams, and alfalfa, 0.138 grams, but had a pH of 7.12
(Table 1 & 2). The soil samples containing alfalfa showed overall higher masses of carbon being
released in comparison to the nitrate concentrations (Fig. 1). The control of one soil sample was
left out of the comparison as the data was not collected for the Matawan series (Fig. 1). The
highest mass of carbon released was 0.138 grams and the nitrate concentration was 50 mg/L
(Figure 1). The highest average mass of carbon released from each soil sample was from the
control jars which released 0.0165 grams of carbon (Figure 2). Taking into account the added
materials of sawdust or alfalfa, the jar which contained soil and alfalfa had the highest mass of
Discussion
The study conducted showed that soils that have a pH that is greater than 6 release more
carbon and tend to have a higher nitrate concentration than soils with a pH lower than 6. The
trends shown in Figure 1 supports this claim because the highest points from each of the added
materials are from soil series that have a pH greater than 6. It can also been seen in Table 2 that
the Glenelg series has the highest nitrate concentrations from the control and added alfalfa jars.
The series has the second highest pH of all five soil series samples. More acidic soils, those with
a pH less than 6, tend to have less soil organic carbon and therefore have a harder time releasing
carbon. Kara and her colleagues (2004) conducted a study similar to this study, but involved
plant life to see the differences in carbon released in soils of varying pH. The study showed that
two soil series, Karaakl and Baglar, were acidic and therefore did not show the same trend of
an increase in CO2 evolution as the other soil series samples (Kara et al., 2004). The study
conducted showed a similar trend to that of Kara and her colleagues: a more acidic soil released
6
Soil Respiration and Nitrogen Transformation Analysis
less carbon than a more basic soil. In order to understand more about soil respiration and the
effects of carbon lost as well as nitrate concentrations, another study should be conducted but
using jars that have incubated for a shorter and longer period of time. If data were to be collected
at these time periods, there could be a better understanding of the carbon removed. A different
set of soil series can also be used to test if pH is a factor that affects the amount of carbon
released. Soils that are more basic (closer to 14) should be observed and compared to those of
this study.
7
Soil Respiration and Nitrogen Transformation Analysis
Table 2. The five different soil samples and the results from titration and the nitrate test on each
of the varying factors.
9
Soil Respiration and Nitrogen Transformation Analysis
Figure 1. The amount of carbon released in comparison to the nitrate concentration for each soil
sample under varying conditions.
10
Soil Respiration and Nitrogen Transformation Analysis
Figure 2. The average mass of carbon released as compared to the average nitrate concentration
of all soil samples under the varying factors.
11
Soil Respiration and Nitrogen Transformation Analysis
Conclusion
Soil respiration studies can help to understand how carbon is removed from the soil as
well as the concentrations of nitrogen in the form of nitrate. In order to fully understand the
processes that take place during soil respiration, a full incubation period is needed to allow the
soils to release the maximum amount of carbon as well as transform the maximum amount of
nitrogen through mineralization or immobilization. As the study shows, a soil that is more acidic
will tend to release less carbon than that of a soil that is more basic. The soils with a pH greater
than 6 had the highest concentrations of nitrate as well as the highest masses of released carbon
even when materials were added to the soil samples. Overall, soil respiration should be studied in
order to understand how much the soils add to the atmospheric carbon flux.
12
Soil Respiration and Nitrogen Transformation Analysis
References
Barrett, J.E., and I.C. Burke. 2000. Potential nitrogen immobilization in grassland soils across a
soil organic matter gradient. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32:1707-1716. doi: 10.1016/S0038-
0717(00)00089-4
Kara, E.E., M. Arli, and V. Uygur. 2004. Effects of herbicide topogard on soil respiration,
Lloyd, J., and J.A. Taylor. 1994. On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Funct. Ecol.
Pell, M., Stenstrm, J., and Granhal, U. 2005. Soil respiration. In: Bloem, J., Hopkins, D.W., and
Benedetti, A., editors, Microbiological methods for assessing soil quality. CABI
Stanford, G., and S.J. Smith. 1972. Nitrogen mineralization potentials of soils. Soil Sci. Soc.