OPENING OF HEARING:

Responsible for room: being the hours of the day _ of _ year _ we are constituted in room 1 to
hold the hearing of oral proceedings within the cause criminal 87/2012 instructed against C. ROSA
EMMA SILVA Ramos by the offense as It is. Attendees, in terms of article 58 of the national code of
criminal procedure, requests stay in this room in a respectful manner and in silence. Are reminded
that is strategically prohibited to introduce equipment or tools that allow you to record video
images, sounds or graphics; nor should introduce weapons or adopt a threatening, provocative,
behavior contrary to decorum, or alter or affect the development of the audience. If you do it will
apply any of the measures provided for in Article 355 of the said code, which may constitute from
the warning until the arrest for thirty-six hours.

Finally ask attendees to stand to receive a Court of prosecution.

Assistants: Foot.

Judge President: Take seat please.

Being the day _ month _, the _ year Court this court proceeds to carry out the hearing of oral
proceedings based on article 391 of the national code of criminal procedure, within the given
criminal case by the in charge of room.

Warns the audience about the importance of what will happen is at this hearing that the
innocence or guilt of the C. ROSA EMMA SILVA RAMOS for the crime of injuryyou accused the
public prosecutor shall be determined. Therefore I request the defendant to put close attention to
everything that happens in this trial, and inform you that it has the right to consult his counsel at
any time, while you do not disturb the order of the hearing.

I ask you now to charge of room: present at this hearing journalists or media are?

(If not)

Responsible for room: Not, judge, are not journalists or media at this hearing.

(If yes)

Responsible for room: Yes, judge, are in this audience journalists and media.

Judge President: reported to journalists and the media present that in accordance with article 55
of the national code of criminal procedure, one of the rights of the accused is not to be exposed to
the media according to the fraction XIV of the Article 113 referral code. By virtue of the foregoing,
instructed journalists and the media in order to stay in place in which have been located, and
refrain from recording and streaming by any means to this audience.

2 IDENTIFICATION OF PARTIES

Judge President: Once opened the hearing, proceed with the stage of individualization. He has the
voice the Public Ministry.
Public Ministry: Licenciado Juan esteban Florencio Amador, agent of the public prosecutor's Office
attached to the Criminal Court of the Fifth Circuit Court of Huejutla de Reyes Hidalgo, with data
previously registered with the administration of that Court.

Chief Justice: ? Who accompanies it?

Legal adviser: Graduate Kevin Said Ortega Venancio , legal adviser of the victim and with data
previously registered with the administration of that Court.

Chief Justice: ? The person who is on their side is the victim?

Public prosecutor .-If the Honourable

Judge President: What is your name?

Victim u offended: Jaime Josu Martnez Gmez

Judge President: MrJaime Josu Martnez Gmez, one of the rights that assists him is that your
personal data safeguard, therefore at this time I ask you if you want to provide your data people in
this audience in a public way or private way?

Victim: Of private way.

Judge President: Instructed to charge of room that takes your data to the end of the present
hearing people the victim.

Judge President: Defender of the accused has the voice.

Ombudsman: Licensed Yareli Jasmine Reyes Hernandez, Particular defense, with address for
hearing and receiving notifications previously registered before this Court.

Judge President: Who accompanies it?

Defendant: Rosa Emma silva Ramos, with data previously registered in this Court.

3 VERIFICATION OF KNOWLEDGE OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL RIGHTS

Judge President: I am writing again to the accused. ROSA EMMA SILVA RAMOS, in stages prior to
this hearing have already reported you their constitutional and legal rights that your lawyers have
explained these rights and it has understood them?

Defendant: Yes Lord judge.

Presiding judge: have a question Rose EMMA SILVA RAMOS

Accused not, Lord judge, I have no doubt.

Judge President: Then asked the victim or victim, Mr JAIME JOSU MARTNEZ GMEZ, have a
question about the constitutional and legal rights that assist you in this procedural time?

Victim u offended: No, judge, I have no doubt

4VERIFICACION OF THE ATTENDEES AND THE THINGS THAT MUST BE EXHBIRSE AT THE HEARING

Judge President: In terms of the provisions of article 391 of the national code of criminal
procedure, the court proceeds to verify the presence of witnesses, experts or interpreters who are
to participate in the debate, as well as the existence of things that should display in.

You ask the public prosecutor's Office: would his witnesses, experts or interpreters are present,
and have the things that of will exhibit at the hearing?

Public Ministry: Yes, judge the following witnesses and experts are: expert on dactiloscopy Eng.
Adriana Ortiz Luna and the expert medical forensic guard Dr. Josfina Avils Lpez, and the things
that will be exhibited at hearing a filleting knife is.

Judge President: lic.kevin has said something to say with respect to the evidence mentioned by
the Prosecutor's office?

Legal adviser: , Lord judge are all the tests and things will be present within this audience.

Judge President: Defense are present their witnesses, experts or interpreters provided by the
defense? would have things that's displayed in the audience?

Ombudsman: Yes, judge the following witnesses and experts are: witness Fabiana Martnez Silva,
the witness Evva Mndez Cruz, witness Alejandro Porras Lopez, the witness Francisca Ruiz Soto
and the expert medical examiner of guard the Enedina Gonzales Dr. Sources .

Judge President: ask witnesses to identify standing.

Based on article 49 of the national code of criminal procedures do it know that the law establishes
criminal sanctions who lead with falsehood, refuse to testify or to grant law protest.

Likewise do it know that the criminal law punishes those who declare with falsehood to this
authority, I ask at this time would protest you in driving with truth?

Witnesses: Yes, I protest.

Judge President: Lords witnesses and experts based on article 371 of the adjective code in matter
is warned that during the development of the audience may not communicate among themselves,
or see, hear or be informed of what happens in the hearing, so it will remain in other than this
room and will be called in his chance to give his statement would have understood?

Witnesses: Yes, Lord judge.

Judge President: instructs the room Assistant to accompany you to the witnesses to the different
where they will remain until being called to give his statement, as well as to safeguard this Court
to push things to be exhibited during the hearing.

Having been legally constituted court, present Parties, witnesses, experts or interpreters who are
to participate in the debate and the existence are things that they will be exhibited in it, is
declared open this trial hearing.

5 ESTABLISHMENT OF ACCUSATIONS AND EVIDENTIARY AGREEMENTS

Judge President: The facts that were matters of accusation by prosecutors contained the drive
from opening of trial and which should be discussed at this hearing are as follows:

On March 4, 2012 JAIME JOSUE MARTINEZ GOMEZ went to the home of his former spouse, Lady
ROSA EMMA SILVA RAMOS, to visit her and her daughter Fabiana Martnez Silva. Before arriving
at the House located on the street 15 may number 302, corner with calle Benito Jurez Cologne
Centre of this city, Jaime Josu Martnez Gmez stopped at the store on the block to buy; there
to exchange a few words with the owner and retired to the home of Rosa Emma Silvia Ramos.

Arriving at home, for some reason, Jaime Martnez decided to enter through a window, in the casa
Rosa Emma Silva Ramos and Fabiana Martnez Silva only. Subsequently, Mr. Jaime Martnez and
rosa Emma Silva held a heated discussion that ended with an injury of weapon pointed cutting into
the abdomen of Jaime, immediately, rose Emma by its own means, transfer to her former husband
to the city's Municipal Hospital where was attended the aforementioned injury.

Legal classification that has been given to these facts is of injury in terms of what has article 140
Criminal code for the State of Hidalgo, committed in tort of C. JAIME JOSUE MARTINEZ GOMEZ,
the degree of intervention that is you attributed to the accused is direct author in terms of article
16 section i of the criminal code for the State of Hidalgo.

6 ALLEGATIONS OF OPENING

Judge President: After opening the debate, giving the word the Public Ministry so concretely
expose their allegations of opening.

Public Prosecutor's Office:

"WHO LESINO TO WHOM?"

Today the prosecution prove beyond reasonable doubt, on March 4, 2012 at approximately 18:15
o'clock at the home located on the street may 15 number 302, corner with calle Benito Jurez, Col.
Centro city , JAIME JOSU MARTNEZ GMEZ victim went to visit his former spouse now imputed
ROSA EMMA SILVA RAMOS and her daughter FABIANA MARTNEZ SILVA. Arriving at the home
noted that a window facing the street was broken, he was made very rare, followed by that
touched the door several times, but no one opened, was knocking the door as five minutes and
got no response, so he imagined that someone had robbed or the House and that perhaps had his
family something. He decided to put to the House by the window, enter I hear a noise and
immediately went to the kitchen and found her former spouse ROSA EMMA SILVA RAMOS itching
something fruit with a huge knife, when she saw him became hysterical and started shouting
words altisonant It is, he told her to leave the House, that was his home and that he had nothing
to be doing there. After that he asked that has ensued that he had only gone to visit her and her
daughter. He subsequently went to give him a kiss and a hug, but it became more hysterical. As
soon as he approached her, he began to hit even with the knife in his hand, he defended not so
asked that he calm down and it will drop the knife because otherwise an accident could occur,
followed by that she said "I'll kill you" by which the victim had no time to react when suddenly she
fit you the knife in the stomach a filleting knife 15 cm blade and black Mage. This knife the perito
spoke us later Eng. ADRIANA ORTIZ LUNA who will tell us that it fingerprints belonging to the
accused ROSA EMMA SILVA moved same the expert will present medical examiner Dr. JOSEFINA
AVILS guard LOPEZ who We will talk about injuries presenting victim as well as the penetrating
abdominal wound about half cm deep and 5 cm length presenting JAIME JOSU MARTNEZ
GMEZ.

Honourable these facts fit specifically into the criminal offence as injury envisaged and sanctioned
by article 140 of the Criminal Code of the State of hidalgo in relation to article 60 of the national
code of criminal procedures. For which I request applies the imprisonment and a corresponding
fine.

Judge President: Has the use of the word victim or the victim's legal advisor for the same effects.

Legal adviser: Honourable do not wish to make use of the voice to express opening allegations.

Judge President: has the voice using the defense of the accused for the same effects.

Ombudsman:

WHO IS THE VICTIM?

That's the question that is is questioning my defended since March 4 that was unjustly arrested by
the municipal police officers to have been designated by have injured to his former spouse Jaime
Josu Martnez Gmez.

On March 4, 2012 was not any day for the family Martinez Silva, is a day that Rosa Emma had not
wanted to live, because that day your ex spouse came home held a strong discussion that involved
violence physical and unfortunately your ex espos or it ended up injured.

Effectively as Ms. rose refers it to the Prosecutor on March 4 and sr Jaime held a discussion at the
home of Mrs. rose, located at 15th Street may number 302, corner with calle Benito Jurez
Cologne City Center the argument began because sr Jaime entered the home through the window
drunk and Ms. Rose said that he had no right to do that to that was the door and to play because
the already not living there, Mr. Jaime was altered and responded that he only wanted to visit
your child, but Ms. Rose was denied because it is not a good example that a teenager sees his
father drunk with high-sounding words, Jaime Josue you that will not cause more problems and
who are allowed to see the boy or if not was going to hit as often had done before, he obeyed him
for good or that it was going to make understand the hard but still she refused, then Jaime Josue
was very violent and began to hit in the stomach and the face; It jalone it and gave him a blow in
the face. And as he could he took it off and I went to the kitchen to grab that defend themselves.
He came behind her, throwing kicks and punches. When he entered the kitchen, first thing he saw
was a knife and grabbed it. Said Jaime Joshua that he not already hit it and answered: "don't be
silly, do you think that with this knife I can make something? " " With or without knife, which
send here I am" will let you come to blows, the only thing that did was grab the knife and lifted
him in the air to scare him and he let it hit, and because Fabian was at home and did not want that
the viera the facts. Suddenly threw it and it removed the knife and began to shout me am going
to kill, I'm going to matar and she said sueltalo sueltalo; he alone, without that she did
nothing, jabbed the knife in the stomach and how started you out blood began to cry and tell him
that he wanted to kill; so she said that she had to take to a hospital. So he bore on his shoulders
and took him to the hospital, which is close to the House. They received it in the emergency room
and the nurse who was on duty at reception desk, said that it was very good that I led so quickly to
hospital.

During the development of the present judgment you will hear the testimony of Ms. rose, also will
attend Mr Alexander who will come to them to tell the State where Jaime sr it was before going to
the home of my defended, also attend the sra Evva who will come to with sign the way in which sr
Jaime entered the home, will be also presented Mr. Francisco who saw struggle the couple,
likewise will be Dr. cesar Lozano who will come to them to say injuries presenting Mrs. Rosa Emma
Silva Ramos.

7. SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE

Judge President: Prior to the relief of the means of proof provided by the parties, is made of the
knowledge of the defendant that in accordance with the articles 377 and 378 of the national code
of criminal procedure, has the right to declararen any time during the audience, if it decides not to
do so, no prior statement that has rendered can be incorporated to this trial as a test or you can
use low no concept would understand these rights?

Defendant: Yes, Lord judge.

Judge President: we will receive the media test offered by the Public Ministry, which will be the
order of sufficiency of means of proof?

Public-Prosecutor's Office Honourable first hear the statement of Mr. Jaime Josu Martnez
Gmez , then the Declaration of the Eng. Adriana Ortiz Luna dactiloscopy expert and finally the
Declaration of the expert medical examiner Dr. Josefina guard Aviles Lopez.

Judge President: request the room Assistant present to sr or expert x. in response to the order you
mentioned your provider.

Auxiliary room: (attached to the witness or expert to the Hall).

Judge President: (told this all the witnesses) Mr. Jaime Josue Martinez Gomez given to know the
legal consequences for those who declare with falsehood before a judicial authority would protest
conducted with the truth before this Court?

Witness or expert: If protested Honourable.

Judge President: (say all the witnesses or experts) sr or expert x. The mp will ask you a series of
questions to which I answer them, analyze before answering, if you hear the word objection does
not answer until I resolved it realized?

Witness or expert: Yes your honor.

Judge President: later mp.

Mp: thank you Honourable.

(the mp performs the interrogation)

Judge President: defence will cross-examine?

Defense: Yes your honor.

(The Defense performed cross-examination)

Judge President: mp want to re question?

Mp: not honourable.

Judge President: ask the room assistant accompany to the (witness or expert x)

(Auxiliary room attached to the witness or expert)

Judge President: request to the present the following witness room Assistant.

Judge President: A continuation will receive the media test offered by the victim or offended.
Given voice to the legal adviser

Legal adviser: I adhere to that offered by the prosecution.

Judge President: Will receive the media test offered by the defense. I ask you to defend what the
order of sufficiency of means of proof?

Defense : honourable in first hear the statement of Mrs. Rosa Emma Silva Ramos, later the
testimony of Fabiana Martnez Silva, after the testimony of Mrs. Evva Mndez Cruz, then the
testimony of Mr. Alejandro Porras Lopez, followed the testimony of Mr. Francisco Ruiz Soto and
finally the Declaration of the expert medical examiner of guard the Krueger Enedina Gonzales
Fuentes.

Judge President: request the room Assistant present to sr or expert x. in response to the order you
mentioned your provider.

Auxiliary room: (attached to the witness or expert to the Hall).

Judge President: (told this all the witnesses) Mr. Jaime Josue Martinez Gomez given to know the
legal consequences for those who declare with falsehood before a judicial authority would protest
conducted with the truth before this Court?

Witness or expert: If protested Honourable.

Judge President: (say all the witnesses or experts) sr or expert x . the defense will ask you a series
of questions to which I answer them, analyze before answering, if you hear the word objection
does not answer until I resolved it realized?

Witness or expert: Yes your honor.

Judge President: later mp.

defense: thank you Honourable.

(the Defense performed the interrogation)

Judge President: mp will cross-examine?

Defense: Yes your honor.

(the mp performs cross-examination)

Judge President: defense want to re question?

Mp: not honourable.

Judge President: ask the room assistant accompany to the (witness or expert x)

(Auxiliary room attached to the witness or expert)

Judge President: request to the present the following witness room Assistant.

8 ALLEGATIONS OF CLOSING

Judge President: Over the sufficiency of evidence offered for this audience of trial debate, is gives
Word to prosecutors to present their closing arguments.

Public Prosecutor's Office:

ALLEGATIONS OF CLOSING

Judge:

With the Foundation which provides article 398 of the national code of criminal procedure in
relation to articles 128 and 129 of the same order, this prosecution prompted legal reclassification
of the facts, in accordance with the evidentiary information that leading test media relieved at the
hearing, therefore injuries, invoked by the Prosecutor's office in the letter of accusation and
allegations of opening, in accordance with article 140 of the Criminal Code of the State of hidalgo.
Is shown judge more than reasonable doubt in the present case the lesion presenting the victim
was produced by acting the Lady ROSA EMMA SILVA RAMOS by a heated argument between this
ex-partners, which was corroborated by the testimony of the expert I NG. ADRIANA ORTIZ LUNA
who indicated that on the knife were found fingerprints of the defendant. This Honourable gives
us account both the victim and the witness of the expert Dr. JOSEFINA AVILS LOPEZ who unveiled
studies that were made to the victim, which said that the wound was penetrating abdominal of
approximately half a centimeter of depth and 5 cm in length and that are slow to heal in about 15
days.

Judge President: advisory legal does make closing argument?

Legal adviser: not your honor I adhere to the exposed by the mp.

Judge President: extends the use of the voice to his legal adviser for the same effects.

Ombudsman:

WHO IS THE VICTIM?

That was the question posed by the defense at the start of this trial and today got an answer and it
was precisely that victim was Mrs. Rosa Emma Silva Ramos, today everyone heard the statement
of Ms. rose who narrated the events that took place as well as the testimony of Mr. Alejandro
Porras Lopez who was clear to point out the State in which it was the James sr s go to the home of
my defended, likewise heard loud from the testimony of Ms. Eva in the manner in which Mr. Jaime
entered to the address circumstances that corroborates what my defended, as said heard the
testimony of the Ms. francisca who saw grapple to the former partner and Mr Jaime was holding a
knife and that the screaming me I'll kill, I'm going to matar and she was screaming s ueltala,
sueltala circumstances corroborating the statement made by my defended, as well as of the
Declaration that came to pay the expert medical examiner of guard the Krueger Enedina Gonzlez
Fuentes snapped clearly injuries presenting victim and finally the statement of the expert Dr.
Josefina Avils Lpez, who said the State of drunkenness that was Mr. Jaime Josu Martnez
Gomes.

9. RIGHT OF USE OF THE WORD TO THE ACCUSED OR HIS DEFENSE

Judge President: Mr. Jaime Josu Martnez Gomes , in terms of article 66 of the national code of
criminal procedure, the law granted the opportunity to speak to you or to your Defender. is there
anything want to tell this Court? Consulting with his counsel

Defendant or Defender: not honourable.

10. CLOSURE OF DEBATE

Judge President: parts heard once and relieved the means test, having been granted the
opportunity to speak to the accused, this Court, in terms of the provisions of article 399 of the
adjective codigp0 in the matter, declared closed the debate.

This Court withdrew to deliberate in private, continuously and isolated to give the corresponding
judgment, so ordered a recess not exceeding 24 hours.

The Parties shall be convened, fittingly, for the resumption of the oral hearing or by any other
means.

The debate is closed.

11. ISSUANCE OF THE RULING AND CLOSING OF HEARING

Room Assistant: being the hours of the day _ _ of the year _ we are constituted in room 1 to
resume the hearing of oral proceedings within the criminal case 1/2017, prompted the audience
to stand for the judge and the members of the Court.

Judge President: take a seat please. Resumes the hearing of oral proceedings based on article 400
of the national code of criminal procedure inside cause it indicated by the auxiliary room.

I give the use of the voice to _, judge rapporteur, who, in terms of the provisions of article 401 of
the referred Code provide respective failure.
( To) In case of acquittal

Judge rapporteur: thank you judge President, having valued the test according to its free
conviction extracted from all of the debate and listening parties and deliberate in private,
continuous and isolated form, in accordance with article 402 of the national code of criminal
procedure, unanimously by members Court is ABSOLVES to LA SRA ROSA EMMA SILVA RAMOS of
the accusation made by the public prosecutor against her within the cause criminal 87/2012 for
the crime of injury against the SR JAIME JOSUE Martinez GOMES, since that is the facts narrated
and tests developed at trial follows the cause of already that of the proceedings at hearing that
the Lady ROSA EMMA SILVA RAMOS acted in self-defense way.

Trade ordering their immediate release, turned to the director of the Center for social inclusion for
the aforementioned purposes.

Based on article 67 of the national code of criminal procedure, is ordered will transcribe the
present resolution.

All those involved are duly notified in accordance with article 63 of the adjective code in matter.

Any other requests?

Public Ministry: Honourable request copy of audio and video of presents it audience.

Defense: Honourable request copy of audio and video of presents it audience.

Judge President: request to charge of room provided as requested by the mp and defence.

Auxiliary room: Yes your honor.

Judge President: Thus this Court resolves it. Rises the audience.

Auxiliary room: ask everyone to stand to bid farewell to the Court of prosecution.