Collaborative Teaching and Learning Course Lesson Plan Peer reviewer name: Jaidy Valero Jimnez.

Peer Review Rubric (AveFnixAlfa Mystiere), Venezuela

Review of Colleague 2 Learning Designer link: https://v.gd/JngLVc Review date: 04 November 2017

Peer Review Rubric - Collaborative Teaching and Learning Course Lesson

Page 1/3
Assign a code
CATEGORY Code 1 Code 2 Code 3 Code 4 or 5
from 1 to 5

a) Is the Lesson Plan The lesson plan is incomplete The lesson plan is complete. The lesson plan is complete and presents a The lesson plan is accurate and engaging. It
complete? with little information Description of learning good variety of learning activities. presents a detailed/rich description of 5
provided. Peer reviewer is activities is very basic and/or Descriptionsare clear and easy to follow. learning activities.
unable to proceed. at times difficult to follow.

b) Is the lesson plan Learning outcomes are not Learning outcomes are
well aligned with its specified. partially mentioned.
learning outcomes? Learning activities are only
partially aligned with the
learning outcomes.
Learning activities link with the defined Learning activities explicitly link with the
learning outcomes. defined learning outcomes. The rationale for 5
the link between activity and outcome is
clearly mentioned.

c) Is the Lesson Plan Learning activities are not
well balanced? well balanced. Just one type
of the Teaching Learning
Activities (TLAs in the
Learning Designer) is used
(see the pie chart for this).
Learning activities are not
well balanced, because some
of the Learning activities
planned take up most of the
time. (see the pie chart for
this).
There is an OK mix of activities with at least
three different TLAs, even if some of the
activities take up more than 35% of the time
(see the pie chart for this).
There is a good mix of activities with at least
four different TLAs and none of the
Activities, except in the case of collaboration,
4
taking up more than 35% of the time (see
the pie chart for this).

d) Does the lesson plan Students are NOT required to Students DO work together Students DO have shared responsibility BUT Students DO have shared responsibility AND
include learning work together in pairs or BUT they DO NOT have they ARE NOT required to make substantive they DO make substantive decisions 5
activities specifically groups. shared responsibility. decisions together. together about the content, process, or
designed to develop product of their work BUT their work is not
students collaborative interdependent (Code 4)
learning skills? OR: their work is interdependent (Code 5).

e) Does the lesson plan The lesson plan does not The lesson plan mentions Assessment activities focus on collaborative Assessment activities focus on collaborative
incorporate incorporate any forms of some form of basic skills of students and includes at least one of skills of students and includes at least two or
appropriate assessment. assessment which does not the following: rubric to assess whole group or more of the following: rubric to assess whole
assessment activities specifically assess the depth group members, self-assessment check-list for group or group members, self-assessment
and tools to assess of collaboration. self- or peer-assessment, the use of digital check-list for self- or peer-assessment, the 4
students collaborative No tools are mentioned. tools facilitating self- and peer-assessment, use of digital tools facilitating self- and peer-
learning? mindmaps/infographics to assess group work assessment, mindmaps/infographics to
or facilitate peer assessment. assess group work or facilitate peer
assessment.

Parts of this rubric are taken from the 21st Century Learning Design Rubric developed by ITL research under a Creative Commons license. For more information, see here.
 Collaborative Teaching and Learning Course Lesson Plan Peer reviewer name: Jaidy Valero Jimnez.
Peer Review Rubric (AveFnixAlfa Mystiere), Venezuela
Review of Colleague 2 Learning Designer link: https://v.gd/JngLVc Review date: 04 November 2017

Page 2/3
Please add below your considerations / appreciation of your colleagues work.
Explain what you like about this lesson plan. Use the above rubrics and the codes you have assigned as a guide.

Dear Colleague 2,

I have detailed with great attention every aspect presented in your Lesson Plan and taking as reference the Rubric of Peer Review proposed in the MOOC
"Collaborative Teaching and Learning" for this final phase of the course, I can tell you that I have detected the following:

1. As a general rule, there are activities that allow students in the 3rd year chemistry course of secondary school to address the topic of "electrochemistry and the
reactivity of metals with acid" in a collaborative way. On the other hand, learning activities are explicitly linked to defined learning outcomes. The link between
activity and result is clearly visible.
2. The lesson plan outlined is accurate and complete in terms of the aspects proposed in the Learning Designer.
3. The lesson plan refers to student review activities to verify if "the metal is reactive or not" but a rubric has not been specified to evaluate members of the whole
group, or the group as such in their work collaborative
4. It was observed that there is a good combination of activities with at least four different TLAs and none of the activities occupies more than 35% of the time but
the activities related to collaborative learning give a total lower than 35% stipulated as one of the aspects to take into consideration when designing the
Learning Plan, as you can see in the image incorporated below

From another angle, I am very pleased with the proposal you have presented in all these collaborative work activities. It seems to me that the use of web tools
and resources are appropriate and I can imagine that it arouses curiosity in students, particularly when they can confirm the results of classmates who are on other
work teams.

I appreciate the possibility of having been selected to review your Lesson Plan because it has enriched my learning and I have known other tools that support
collaborative work as well as another style of teaching.

Congratulations for your effort and for your work.

Greetings from Venezuela,
Jahidy Valero Jimnez, Real Life
AveFnixAlfa Mystiere, Second Life.

Parts of this rubric are taken from the 21st Century Learning Design Rubric developed by ITL research under a Creative Commons license. For more information, see here.
 Collaborative Teaching and Learning Course Lesson Plan Peer reviewer name: Jaidy Valero Jimnez.
Peer Review Rubric (AveFnixAlfa Mystiere), Venezuela
Review of Colleague 2 Learning Designer link: https://v.gd/JngLVc Review date: 04 November 2017

Page 3/3
Please provide some constructive feedback / possible suggestions to improve your colleagues work.
You can recommend a tool or an optional activity / group work technique that might add to the effectiveness of the collaborative learning
activities.

Dear Colleague 2,

As a point of improvement on this lesson plan, I can suggest carrying out a review of the activities to determine how to achieve the
appropriate adaptation to the collaborative work in such a way that the minimum established in the course is obtained, 35%.

On the other hand, consider the possibility that students can make an evaluation of the course and the teacher, in addition to the
self-assessment. This contributes to the objective and integral training of the student thinking about the professional future and his/her
ethics as an individual.

Thank you very much for the opportunity and for having contributed to my personal and professional growth.

A cordial greeting and blessings from Venezuela.

Parts of this rubric are taken from the 21st Century Learning Design Rubric developed by ITL research under a Creative Commons license. For more information, see here.