Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Question:
One of the best things that a person can have in their relationship toolkit is the ability to
resolve conflicts through effective communication. Review the section entitled Positive
Communication Strategies and try using them in a conversation with a loved one. You may
teach the strategies to your partner before the conversation. The conversation should last for at
least 5 to 10 minutes. In your paper, describe your relationship with your partner, the topic of
the discussion and your reaction to the conversation. Interview your partner and get their
reaction as well. What skills were most helpful?
myself Really? I have to repeat exactly what he said? It all seemed a little over the top. I
remembered, when I was serving a church service mission, they had us undertake a similar
goals, ask for their help to accomplish goals, discuss strengths and weaknesses of the
companionship, resolve conflicts, share strengths that your companion has, and ask how you can
improve. I always believed it to be a really long process that in the long run helped, but thought
it could be shorter. So, I decided to give the Positive Communication Strategies a try, because
The discussion that took place had three stages that are part of the Positive
Communication Strategies: mirror stage, validation stage and empathy stage. The mirror stage
had one partner state a concern in short segments and the other partner would repeat what was
said to see if they understood correctly. If the concern was miscommunicated, the partner with
the concern would discuss it again and the other would repeat what was said. One would
continue this process until the concern was properly understood. At first, I thought the mirror
stage was unnecessary and a waste of time, but as my husband and I completed this stage I
realized how much it helped. I realized I was not the best at explaining my concern, which made
it difficult for my husband to understand, which led to miscommunication. The mirror effect
The second stage was validation. Basically, one would validate the others concern as
legitimate, even if they disagreed. If one did disagree, they were to try to look at it from the
others perspective. The first time we went through this stage my husband realized that he tends
to do this stage in his head and forget about it all together. He recognized that, even though he
The third stage was the empathy stage. The partner listening to the concern would empathize
with the other as to how they were feeling. If they understood the wrong feelings then they
would repeat the mirror stage. Once all was understood they were to ask if there were additional
concerns which needed to be discussed. This stage made the process complete and full. Neither
After we had completed the strategy my husband concluded I think this assignment was
very well timed. There were things that needed to be discussed and having to do it for the
assignment gave us both the courage to bring those things up. I know that I felt relieved
afterwards, and I hope to be able to continue to discuss things in the future in the same way.
During the day, before we started this assignment, there were some prominent issues that
we both knew needed to be discussed, but were not. I was frustrated with my husband and
myself. In order to find some distraction, I looked up what essay topics I should choose from. I
also agree that this assignment was very well timed. Although, at first, I believed this experiment
was redundant it helped exponentially in the long run. I strongly urge other partners to use this
strategy to improve their relationship. Even though it may seem like nothing needs to be
References:
Strong, B, & Cohen, T. F. (2017). The Marriage and Family Experience: Intimate Relationships