Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Each state conducts its relations with other states on the basis of particular
understandings of the legal status of those other states. In many instances, such
understandings are uncontroversial and amount to a recognition of the status
quo: the UK and its dealings with France, for example. Sometimes, however, a
state can take a position which challenges the existing order, such as recognizing
a new state-for example the claim of Kosovo in 2008 to constitute a state
comprising territory formerly part of Serbiaor take a position which rejects a
claim itself challenging the status quo-for example that of the Turkish Republic of
Northern Cyprus to constitute a state comprising territory formerly part of
Cyprus. Recognition, then, can be an attempt to alter or reaffirm the existing
order.
There are two main international law aspects to the recognition process.
Recognition can play a role in the international legality of the object of
recognition: sometimes, a state is or is not a state legally because, amongst other
things, other states have decided to treat it as such.
The recognition itself is regulated by international law, in that states are
sometimes constrained in their choices when comes to recognition.
These two aspects are related, and can come into tension insofar as states seek
through recognition to create a new sovereignty arrangement which challenges
the legal status quo and thereby is potentially at odds with their obligations to
another state or group of states whose entitlements are being altered by this
change.
BACKGROUND
Some states do not establish relations with new nations quickly and thus do not
recognize them despite having no dispute and sometimes favorable relations.
These are excluded from the list. Some countries fulfill the declarative criteria, are
recognized by the large majority of other nations and are members of the United
Nations, but are included in the list here because one or more other states do not
recognize their statehood, due to territorial claims or other conflicts. There are
193 United Nations (UN) member states. The Holy See and the State of
Palestine have observer state status in the United Nations.
UN MEMBER STATES NOT RECOGNISED BY AT LEAST ONE
UN MEMBER
Armenia, independent since 1991, is not recognised by one UN member, Pakistan,
as Pakistan has a position of supporting Azerbaijan since the Nagorno-Karabakh
War.
The People's Republic of China (PRC), proclaimed in 1949, is the more widely
recognised of the two claimant governments of "China", the other being
the Republic of China (ROC, also known as Taiwan). The PRC does not accept
diplomatic relations with states that recognise the ROC (19 UN members and
the Holy See as of 13 June 2017). Most of these states do not officially recognise
the PRC as a state, though some states have established relations with the ROC
while stating they do not intend to stop recognising the PRC (Kiribati,
Nauru). Some states which currently recognise only the PRC have attempted
simultaneous recognition and relations with the ROC and the PRC in the past
(Liberia, Vanuatu). According to United Nations General Assembly Resolution
2758, the PRC is the only legitimate representative of China to the United
Nations. Republic of China claims to be the sole legitimate government over all
of China under the Constitution of the Republic of China.
Both the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) and Morocco claim
sovereignty over the territory of Western Sahara. The SADR, which declared its
independence in 1976, has been recognised by 84 UN member states and South
Ossetia. 39 states, however, have since retracted or suspended recognition,
pending the outcome of a referendum on self-determination. Western Sahara is
not recognised as part of Morocco by any state, but some states support
the Moroccan autonomy plan. Moroccan "territorial integrity" is favoured by
the Arab League. The SADR is a member of the African Union. United Nations
General Assembly Resolution 34/37 recognised the right of the Western Sahara
people to self-determination and recognised also the Polisario Front as the
representative of the Western Sahara people. Western Sahara is listed on
the United Nations list of Non-Self-Governing Territories. Morocco claims
Western Sahara as part of its sovereign territory.
EXCLUDED ENTITIES
The Sovereign Military Order of Malta is a non-state sovereign entity and is not
included, as it claims neither statehood nor territory. It has established
full diplomatic relations with 105 sovereign states as a sovereign subject of
international law and participates in the United Nations as an observer entity.
Although it is not recognised as a subject of international law by France, the order
maintains official, but not diplomatic, relations with France and also with five
other states: Germany, Belgium, Switzerland, Luxembourg and Canada.
Uncontacted peoples who either live in societies that cannot be defined as
states or whose statuses as such are not definitively known.
Entities considered to be micronations are not included. Even though
micronations generally claim to be sovereign and independent, it is often
debatable whether a micronation truly controls its claimed territory. For this
reason, micronations are usually not considered of geopolitical relevance. For a
list of micronations, see list of micronations.
Those areas undergoing current civil wars and other situations with problems
over government succession, regardless of temporary alignment with the
inclusion criteria (e.g. by receiving recognition as state or legitimate government),
where the conflict is still in its active phase, the situation is too rapidly changing
and no relatively stable rump states have emerged yet.
Rebel groups which have declared independence and exert some control over
territory, but which reliable sources do not describe as meeting the threshold of a
sovereign state under international law. Examples include Donetsk People's
Republic, Luhansk People's Republic, Republic of West Papua and the Islamic
State of Iraq and the Levant.
Those of the current irredentist movements and governments in exile that do not
satisfy the inclusion criteria by simultaneously not satisfying the declarative
theory and not having been recognised as state or legitimate government by any
other state.