Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ethan-doyle-white@hotmail.co.uk
Abstract
This essay provides the first comprehensive examination of how the term
Wiccaused in reference to the modern religion of Pagan Witchcraft
has been utilised throughout the faiths history. Examining its anteced-
ents, including the Old English wicca and the early Gardnerian Wica,
the author looks at the many definitions that the term has seen over the
last seventy years, and comes to conclusions that provide a new interpre-
tation of not only how the term has been used in the Pagan community
of the past and the present, but also how it can most effectively be used
in the future.
1. Rosemary Ellen Guiley, The Encyclopedia of Witches, Witchcraft & Wicca (third
edition), (New York: Checkmark Books, 2008), 371.
Equinox Publishing Ltd 2010, Unit S3, Kelham House, 3 Lancaster Street, Sheffield S3 8AF
186 The Pomegranate 12.2 (2010)
regarding the issue of how the term Wicca, along with related terms
such as Wica and the Wicca, can and should be used. In this study, I
plan to examine the origins and etymology of the word, and the histori-
cal context in which it developed, in order to better understand how it
has been used and by whom since the 1950s.
Despite the large amount of work that has been undertaken by a
number of academics and independent researchers into the history of the
Pagan Witchcraft movement, no full examination of the development of
the term Wicca has ever before been published. Nonetheless, two pre-
liminary studies of the subject have already been made: the first of these
was an examination of the usage of the term Wicca within the United
States by Pagan scholar Chas S. Clifton, which was published in his 2006
book Her Hidden Children: The Rise of Wicca and Paganism in America.2 The
second was made by Melissa Seims, a British Gardnerian who published
her findings in a 2008 article entitled Wica or Wicca? Politics and the
Power of Words. In this article, first published in one of Britains best
known Craft magazines, The Cauldron, and later made available through
her personal website, she identified the usage of the word Wica (spelt
with one c and distinct from the contemporary word Wicca) within
early Gardnerianism and also explored the use of the word Wiccen by
another early Pagan Witch, Charles Cardell.3 Whilst Clifton and Seimss
works were pioneering, I take issue with some of their assumptions and
conclusions, and in this article I attempt to go beyond such preliminary
explorations of the subject by examining the evolution and development
of the term throughout the twentieth century.
2. Chas S. Clifton, Her Hidden Children: The Rise of Wicca and Paganism in America
(Lanham, Maryland: AltaMira Press, 2006.), 88-91.
3. Melissa Seims, Wica or Wicca? Politics and the Power of Words, The Cauldron
129, August 2008, http://www.thewica.co.uk/wica_or_wicca.htm.
4. Bill Griffiths, Aspects of Anglo-Saxon Magic (Hockwold-cum-Wilton, Norfolk:
Anglo-Saxon Books, 1996), 95.
magical charms and spells that had been used by both Pagans and Chris-
tians, some of which have survived in written records for us today.
What such evidence therefore makes clear is that the Old English
term wicca and the Modern English term Wiccaseparated by case
distinction, by pronunciation, and by a millennium in between their
usageare fundamentally and indisputably two distinct words with
very different meanings. Nonetheless, this does not rule out the possibil-
ity, and indeed the likelihood, that the modern term Wicca was influ-
enced, or even based upon, the Early Mediaeval wicca. The fact that
both related to forms of magical praxes, albeit ones that were radically
different to one another, makes it seem likely that the modern term was
heavily influenced by its historical counterpart. It comes as little surprise
that modern Pagan Witches would choose to adopt a historical term
such as wicca, for like almost all contemporary Pagan faiths, theirs
is one that draws heavily (in terms of iconography and inspiration, if
not actual belief and praxes), from the historical polytheistic peoples of
history. Gerald Gardner and other early Pagan Witches firmly associated
their Craft with the ancient British Pagans, believing there to be a direct
connection between the two via the Witch Cult, and by re-adopting the
term wicca in some form, they would have been cementing such a con-
nection, at least in their own eyes.
5. Philip Heselton, Wiccan Roots: Gerald Gardner and the Modern Witchcraft Revival
(Chieveley, Berkshire: Capall Bann, 2000).
They are the people who call themselves the Wica, the wise people, who
practise the age-old rites.6
This quote implies that he must have therefore associated his Wica
with the Old English wicca,and he certainly appeared to believe,
albeit incorrectly, that the Craft religion dated back to at least this
period. From his own personal accounts, it seems that he got this term
Wica from the New Forest coven who had initiated him in Septem-
ber 1939. For example, in The Meaning of Witchcraft, he recounted that:
I was half-initiated before the word Wica which they used hit me like a
thunderbolt, and I knew where I was, and that the Old Religion still existed.9
It was halfway through when the word Wica was first mentioned: and I
then knew that that which I had thought burnt out hundreds of years ago
still survived.10
Patricia Crowther.13 Similar uses can also be seen in the writings of other
early Gardnerians like Raymond Buckland, Monique and Scotty Wilson,
and in the oral use of it by Charles Clark.14 What is clearly illustrated by
such evidence is that despite any claims to the contrary made by current
Pagans, there is no evidence that the early Gardnerians made use of the
term Wicca to refer to either their tradition or to Pagan Witchcraft in
general, and that instead they used Wica to refer to the community of
Pagan Witches.
13. Arnold Crowther and Patricia Crowther, The Witches Speak, (Douglas, Isle of
Man: Athol Publications, 1965), 39.
14. Raymond Buckland, Witchcraftthe Religion, (Brentwood, New York: The
Buckland Museum of Witchcraft and Magick, 1966), 20; Seims, Wica or Wicca?.
15. Aidan A. Kelly, Inventing Witchcraft: A Case Study in the Creation of a New Reli-
gion, (Loughborough, Leicestershire: Thoth Publications, 2007), 87.
We feel it is tragick
That those who lack Magick.
Should start a vendetta
With those who know betta
We who practice the Art
Have no wish to take part
Seems a pity the Wicca
Dont realise this Quicca.16
16. Letter from Margaret Bruce to Gardner. Held in the Museum of Witchcraft,
Boscastle. Cited in Seims, Wica or Wicca?.
17. Seims, Wica or Wicca?.
18. Seims, Wica or Wicca?.
access to these books, which at the time were three of only four works
to be published on the subject, and it would not have been a large step
for some of them to adapt the Old English wicca,which they believed
to be an ancient word for witch, into the Modern English Wicca, a
term for their newly burgeoning faith.
26. June Johns, King of the Witches: The World of Alex Sanders, (London: Peter Davies,
1969).
27. Stewart Farrar, What Witches Do: A Modern Coven Revealed, (London: Peter
Davies, 1971), 04-06.
28. Alex Sanders, The Alex Sanders Lectures. (New York: Magickal Childe Publish-
ing, 1984).
the oldest known written use of the word Wicca in reference to the
modern Pagan religion. Despite this, it can be said for certain that at
least by the latter part of the 1960s and early part of the 1970s, terms like
Wiccan, Wicca, and the Wicca were being used in reference to the
Pagan Witchcraft religion as a whole amongst the Gardnerians, Frosts,
and the early Alexandrians, and that they were gradually becoming
more publicly identifiable. This trend for referring to the Pagan Witch-
craft religion as Wicca had obvious advantages: the term witchcraft
had always had negative connotations in the Western imagination, being
associated with the malevolent usage of magic and Satanic rites. As a
result of this, many of the early Pagan Witches had persecution by those
who believed them to be evil and dangerous individuals, suffering from
broken windows, arson attacks, or having their children taken into social
care. By adopting Wicca over Witchcraft as the name of their faith,
they automatically removed some (although by no means all) of the
social stigma that would otherwise have been associated with them.
29. Paul Kane, Mastering Witchcraft, The Cauldron 135, February 2010; personal
communication with Paul Huson.
30. Paul Huson, Mastering Witchcraft: A Practical Guide for Witches, Warlocks &
Covens (New York: G.P. Putnams Sons, 1970).
but at the same time referred to the texts within the Gardnerian Book
of Shadows as Wiccan liturgy and declared that the Wicca (Witch-
craft) is a Mystery Religion.31 This usage of the Wicca is identical to
that which Alex Sanders had been using in his lectures just a few years
previously in England, and is further evidence of the use of such a term
amongst both Alexandrians and Gardnerians.
The late 1960s and 1970s also saw the public emergence of a number
of new Pagan Witchcraft traditions in the United States such as the 1734
Craft, the Feri tradition, and The New Reformed Orthodox Order of the
Golden Dawn. Perhaps the most notable new tradition, however, was
Dianic Witchcraft, a feminist, Goddess-orientated Craft variant devel-
oped by Zsuzsanna Budapest, a Hungarian immigrant who based it
upon prior published books on Pagan Witchcraft along with her own
personal politics. After founding a Dianic coven in Los Angeles, she
went on to write her own work, The Holy Book of Womens Mysteries
(1979), in which she included several of her earlier articles that had been
published in various magazines. Although in most of these she referred
to her religious path as witchcraft, in one of them, entitled Herstory
and dating from February 1974, she wrote that Thousands of wicca
covens exist today, indicating that she either knew of the term Wicca
(but here had simply failed to capitalize it), or, perhaps less likely in this
context, was referring to the original Anglo-Saxon word.32 Either way,
it is clear that she chose to rarely make use of the term Wicca, prefer-
ring to reclaim witchcraft from its negative connotations for the Pagan
feminist cause, just as an organization named WITCHthe Womens
International Terrorist Conspiracy from Hell, had done in the 1960s. This
trend amongst early feminist Goddess-orientated Witches to avoid the
term Wicca was continued by Starhawk, the founder of the Reclaim-
ing tradition, who wrote the influential book The Spiral Dance: A Rebirth
of the Ancient Religion of the Great Goddess (1979). In this work, she makes
no mention of Wicca, perhaps because she was simply not aware of it,
instead referring to her faith as Witchcraft.33 In later decades, however,
she appears to have changed her position on this, authoring a book enti-
tled The Beginners Guide to Wicca (2003).
Whilst the Alexandrians and others had begun using Wicca in
reference to the Pagan Witchcraft religion as a whole, it appears that
31. Raymond Buckland, The Tree: The Complete Book of Saxon Witchcraft (York Beach,
Maine: Wesier, 1974), 2.
32. Zsuzsanna Budapest, The Holy Book of Womens Mysteries Volume I (revised
edition), (Privately published, 1986 [1979]), 18.
33. Starhawk, The Spiral Dance: A Rebirth of the Ancient Religion of the Great Goddess
(San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1999 [1979]).
during the 1970s and 1980s, as a term it had become increasingly associ-
ated purely with Gardnerianism-Alexandrianism, the British traditions
which emphasised an initiatory lineage and held to highly similar litur-
gies within their respective Books of Shadows. In North America, these
began to be referred to as British Traditional Wicca in order to sepa-
rate them from both American-based initiatory traditions like Feri and
the increasing numbers of solitary practitioners. In turn, it appears that
many Gardnerians and Alexandrians actually began to see Wicca as a
term that applied purely to themselves, and not to other forms of Pagan
Witchcraft, whilst some non-Gardnerian-Alexandrians began refus-
ing to consider themselves to be classified as Wiccan, quite probably
because of a wish to disassociate themselves from the Craft of Gardner
or Sanders.34 The idea that Wicca should apply purely to Gardnerian-
ism and to a lesser extent Alexandrianism (which at the time had a far
smaller presence in North America) had implications for the politics of
the Pagan community. Many of the early Gardnerians in America were
accused of a snobbish attitude towards other Pagan Witches, denigrat-
ing non-Gardnerians and setting up their own system of paperwork to
ensure that only those who had a correct initiatory lineage could work
within a Gardnerian coven.35 By then adopting the idea that only they
could be considered Wiccan, these Gardnerians would have been
further securing what they perceived as their own unique and special
position within the Pagan community.
Meanwhile, 1981 saw the publication of Wicca: The Ancient Way,
the first book to contain the word Wicca actually within the title.
Written by three individuals going under the pseudonyms of Janus-
Mithras, Nuit-Hilaria, and Mer-Amun, the book was published by
the Canadian company Isis Urania and referred to Wicca as an ini-
tiatory path (thereby inferring that it referred purely to Gardnerian-
ism and its associated traditions) whilst at the same time referred to the
Craft which it was describing as Traditional Witchcraft, something
that was in firm contrast to later usage of that particular term, which
has been typically reserved for explicitly non-Gardnerian groups.36
could follow, without the need for an initiation into a pre-existing tradi-
tion. Best known amongst these was Scott Cunninghams Wicca: A Guide
for the Solitary Practitioner (1988), in which he clearly accepted the idea
that the eclectic form of the Craft that he was propagating was a form
of Wicca.37 This book proved to be probably the most influential text on
the subject of Pagan Witchcraft published in the 1980s, selling tens of
thousands of copies and being reprinted several times in future decades.
It no doubt provided a huge boost to the idea of Wicca being a term
that covered the entirety of the Pagan Witchcraft movement, something
which would only be solidified with the publication in ensuing years of
works like Gerina Dunwhichs The Wicca Garden (1996), D.J. Conways
Wicca: The Complete Craft (2001), Raymond Bucklands Wicca for Life (2004)
and Wicca for One (2004), Arin Murphy-Hiscocks Solitary Wicca for Life
(2005), and Ann-Marie Gallaghers The Wicca Bible (2005), all of which
propagated their own eclectic variants of the Pagan Craft designed for
those who wished to initiate themselves. However, the biggest name in
the do-it-yourself Pagan Craft book market after Cunningham was
a controversial American author who went under the pseudonym of
Silver RavenWolf. In her books, such as Teen Witch: Wicca for a New Gen-
eration (1998), she equated Wicca as being simply another word for
Pagan WitchCraft (as she unusually chose to spell it), and in doing
so again continued to be a heavy influence on how tens of thousands of
readers, particularly those from younger generations, developed their
terminology.38
This increasingly eclectic attitude to what could be defined under the
umbrella term of Wicca soon spread from the United Kingdom and
United States into other parts of the globe. In France, a minor Lucife-
rian or demonological group emerged in the late 1980s and early 1990s
calling itself Le Wicca Franaise,whilst in India, the Pagan Witch Ipsita
Roy Chakraverti, who had been initiated into a highly New Age, femi-
nist-influenced version of the Craft in Canada, set about propagating her
own variation of the religion which she called Wicca.39 It also featured
in fiction as well, with the American teen novel Book of Shadows (2001),
written by Cate Tiernan, referring to a wide range of Pagan Craft tradi-
tions as Wicca, and in the United Kingdom that particular book and
its sequels were actually published by Puffin under the title of the Wicca
37. Scott Cunningham, Wicca: A Guide for the Solitary Practitioner, (St. Paul:
Llewellyn, 1998).
38. Silver RavenWolf, Teen Witch: Wicca for a New Generation, (St. Paul, Minnesota:
Llewellyn, 1998).
39. Lamond, Fifty Years; Ipsita Roy Chakraverti, Beloved Witch: An Autobiography
(New Delhi: HarperCollins India, 2000).
series.40
As this shows, by the 1990s, with the increasing popularity of eclectic
forms of Pagan Witchcraft, particularly amongst the younger genera-
tion, the term Wicca began to be used increasingly as a term of self-
designation by those with no training in Gardnerian or other related
traditions. In turn it began to be picked up and utilized in popular tel-
evision shows such as Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Charmed. Indeed,
the very first episode of Charmed, screened on The WB network on 7
October 1998, was entitled Something Wicca This Way Comes, whilst
the tenth episode of the first season, aired on 13 January 1999, was enti-
tled Wicca Envy. Despite this use of the term Wicca in the episode
titles, the witches featured in the series were clearly not Wiccans in any
sense of the word, not having any religious or Pagan components to their
particular magical practices. Although Charmed ran for a further seven
seasons, Wicca would only be used once more in an episode title, that
of the season seven finale, Something Wicca This Way Goes?, which
directly emulated the title of the series debut episode.41 The fact that the
term had even been used at all in these episode titles is noteworthy for
two reasons. First of all it provides evidence for the fact that Wicca was
widely enough known in the United States to be used in popular culture.
Secondly it showed that the term Wicca had been used in reference to
a generic, fictional, and non-Pagan form of witchcraft, illustrating the
extent to quite how generic the term itself had become in popular usage.
In essence, many probably simply believed Wicca was an alternate
word for witchcraft or magic.
40. Cate Tiernan, Book of Shadows (London: Puffin Books, 2002 [2001]).
41. Charmed, The Internet Movie Database, http://uk.imdb.com/title/
tt0158552/.
42. Rhiannon Ryall, West Country Wicca: A Journal of the Old Religion (Chieveley,
Berkshire: Capall Bann, 1993); Ronald Hutton, The Triumph of the Moon: A History of
Modern Pagan Witchcraft (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 302.
43. A.R. Clay-Egerton, Coven of the Scales: The Collected Writings of A.R. Clay-Egerton
(London: Ignotus Press, 2002), 14, 47.
44. Steve Wilson, personal communication, 22 September 2010.
45. Melusine Draco, foreword to Coven of the Scales: The collected writings of A.R.
Clay-Egerton, by A.R. Clay-Egerton, (Ignotus Press, 2002), 05.
Traditional Craft, shows how powerfully the term Wiccan can actu-
ally divide people within the Pagan Witchcraft movement, and displays
an us and them mentality between self-professed Traditional Witches
and more Gardnerian-influenced forms of the religion.46
It is important here that we look at why it is that so many Traditional
Witches have been so vehement in their rejection of Wicca as a defin-
ing term. Some of those who have done so, such as Shani Oates of the
Clan of Tubal Cain and Trystyn M. Branwynn of the American-based
Clan Bol, have argued against being labelled as such because their par-
ticular groups hold to Luciferian and Gnostic beliefs that differ funda-
mentally from those of Pagan Witchcraft.47 Other Traditional Witches
have, however, rejected the term on what could be seen as more spuri-
ous grounds. One American Traditionalist informed me that his form of
the Traditional Craft differed from Wicca because in his view, Wicca
(by this meaning the Gardnerian-based traditions) was simply a form
of Co-Masonry (an idea presumably obtained from the fact that Co-
Masonry was an early influence on Gardnerianism), something which I
believe shows fundamental misunderstanding of the nature and history
of Pagan Witchcraft. Similar sentiments regarding a supposed funda-
mental difference between Traditional and Wiccan (i.e. Gardnerian-
based) forms of the Pagan Craft are regularly expressed in the literature
on the topic: Tony Steele defines Traditionalism as the witchcraft of the
ancestors, something he contrasts with modern witchcraft, whilst both
Nigel G. Pearson and the writer going under the pseudonym of Gwyn
define Traditionalism as being anything pre-Gardnerian.48 In effect, the
Traditional Craft is usually defined as being specifically in contrast with
Wicca (i.e. Gardnerian-based traditions).
It seems evident that on the whole, a significant number, if not the
majority of self-described Traditional Witches explicitly reserve the
term Wicca for Gardnerian-based forms of Pagan Witchcraft, in some
cases expanding this to include more recent forms of the Craft, such as
Dianic. I believe that one of the key reasons for Traditionalists wishing
to distance themselves from the Gardnerian-based mainstream was that
they saw it as becoming too intertwined and influenced by the New
Age movement, with its iconographical emphasis on white light, and
46. See for instance Gwyn, Light from the Shadows: A Mythos of Modern Traditional
Witchcraft (Chieveley, Berkshire: Capall Bann, 1999), 03; Tony Steele, The Rites &
Rituals of Traditional Witchcraft (Milverton, Somerset: Capall Bann, 2001), 01; Nigel
G. Pearson, Treading the Mill: Practical Craftworking in Modern Traditional Witchcraft
(Milverton, Somerset: Capall Bann, 2007), 07-08.
47. Shani Oates and Trystyn M. Branwynn, personal communication.
48. Steele, Rites & Rituals, 01; Pearson, Treading the Mill, 07-08; Gwyn, Light, 03.
its heavy use of eclecticism, something which they felt ran against the
grain of the traditional European idea that witchcraft was associated
with darkness. Doreen Valiente, who in her final published work had
come to embrace a more Traditional and Cochranian-based form of
the Craft than Gardnerianism, amply described this when she stated
that the Traditional Craft would appear disturbing to many readers
who were accustomed to the rather airy-fairy view of Wicca which has
become prevalent today, with its merry ring-dances in the nude and its
insistence on a bland attitude of optimism and love towards all.49
A second reason is that by designating themselves as Traditional
Witches, these practitioners are harking back to the idea that the contem-
porary Witchcraft movement has connections to historical and even pre-
historic forms of witchcraft and Paganism. The Gardnerian movement
had been effectively exposed as being twentieth-century in construction
by the studies of Aidan Kelly and Ronald Hutton during the 1980s and
1990s, and it would be unsurprising that in order to continue maintain-
ing the strongly held belief in a historical connection to old traditions,
many Pagan Witches would begin referring to themselves as Tradi-
tional Witches rather than Wiccans, with the latter terms specific
association with Gardnerianism. Indeed, Hutton noted that he knew of
three covens which had been founded in the 1980s, all claiming to be
Wiccan, who in the 1990s switched to referring to themselves as Tra-
ditional Witches.50
Conclusion
So far in this essay, I have endeavoured to display the evolution of the
word Wicca and those words that are etymologically associated with
it. The root behind all of these is undoubtedly the Old English wicca,
a term that not only provided the basis for the Modern English term
witch but which also provided many contemporary Pagans with an
archaic word that in some manner connected them with their ancient
polytheistic forebears. The earliest possible evidence of this Mediae-
val term influencing the contemporary movement comes from 1939,
when the New Forest coven were supposedly making use of a word
that Gardner would go on to spell Wica, and which he used to refer
to the Pagan Craft community as an entity. In the late 1950s, Gardners
rival, Charles Cardell, had begun referring to Pagan Witches themselves
49. Doreen Valiente, Preface to Witchcraft: A Tradition Renewed, by Evan John Jones,
(London: Hale, 1990), 07.
50. Hutton, Triumph, 385.
as Wiccens and by the late 1960s and early 1970s the later Gardneri-
ans, Alexandrians, and the Frosts were referring to Pagan Witchcraft as
Wicca or the Wicca. Soon this terminology spread across the occult
community in both Britain and the United States. During this decade,
there was an explosion of new Pagan Craft traditions, particularly in the
North America, many of whom, in an attempt to disassociate themselves
from Gardnerianism-Alexandrianism, refused to define themselves as
Wiccan, identifying it as a term that could only apply to those tradi-
tions themselves. Then, in the1980s, many of the new, solitary, eclectic
Pagan Witches, who were publicizing their Craft through the publica-
tion of books, once more began using Wicca in its original all-inclusive
usage and self-describing themselves as Wiccans.
As I believe that this wealth of evidence displays, there are two alter-
native yet identifiable definitions of Wicca that have been used within
both Pagan and academic circles for the last thirty years and which con-
tinue to be utilized. The firstand apparently olderdefinition uses the
term in a broad, inclusive manner that covers most, if not all, forms of
modern Pagan Witchcraft, particularly if they share sufficiently similar
theological beliefs, dates of commemoration and magical praxes. The
second uses the term to refer specifically to the tradition of Gardnerian
Witchcraft, along with those which are heavily based upon it with little
variation, namely Alexandrian and Algard Witchcraft. In North America
these particular groups are sometimes collectively called British Tradi-
tional Wicca because of their shared origins and liturgies.
The reasons why practitioners of Pagan Witchcraft might choose to
adopt a certain definition are myriad, and will differ widely not only
across continents but also likely amongst covens and amongst individu-
als. A sociological study into how Pagan Witches use their terminology
would be invaluable here, although as this author is unaware of any
such study, I can instead only provide some suggestions, based upon my
own personal experience with the Pagan and occult communities. The
most prominent reason that people choose to use one over the other, and
to therefore consider themselves a Wiccan, Witch, or Traditional
Witch must likely be because that is what they have been taught to do,
either by coven members, friends, or through books. How important
that definition is to them is also something that most probably differs
widely. For some practitioners, I believe that the word Wiccan is an
intrinsic part of their identity, making them feel like they are a part of a
community. In this manner it can also be used as a symbol of pride, or of
self-designation, and can be a sign of personal defiance against a domi-
nant community that is primarily of another faith. It might be avidly
preferred over the term Witch with its negative connotations or could
nity. This is something that is more easily uncovered via a simple exami-
nation of the published material by the leading figures in Pagan and
esoteric studies. The American Margot Adler took the first definition in
her study of Paganism in the United States, as did Aidan Kelly in his in-
depth study of the sources behind Gardnerian liturgy.54 Chas S. Clifton,
in his further study of American Paganism, noted the existence of both
definitions, but in general held to the former, for instance describing
Starhawk as a Wiccan.55 Amongst British academics within this field,
there appears to be a tendency to be more noncommittal to either defini-
tion. For instance, Graham Harvey, in his study of the Pagan movement,
notes both definitions but does not subscribe to either, whilst the British
historian Ronald Hutton, in his seminal study of Wiccan history, did not
make his usage of the term at all clear.56 Although it therefore appears
that the academic community, or at least those within the academic
community who have published most widely on this topic, have prima-
rily adopted the first definition, there is clearly still a level of disagree-
ment and confusion on the matter. This inconsistency in usage within
academia has sometimes led to issues arising even within the same pub-
lication. As a case in point, in The New Generation Witches: Teenage Witch-
craft in Contemporary Culture, an anthology edited by Helen E. Johnston
and Peg Aloi and published by Ashgate in 2007, one contributor, the
practicing American Witch Stephanie Martin, used Wicca to refer to
the entirety of the Pagan Witchcraft movement, whilst the British occult-
ist Julian Vayne instead utilized the alternate definition.57
I believe that for multiple reasons the adoption of the former defi-
nition is the more logical option for scholars to use when discussing
the Pagan Witchcraft movement. However, that is not to say that any
particular definition should, or indeed could, be implemented univer-
sally. Any attempt by the academic or wider scholarly community to try
and impose a singular definition would without doubt be resented and
ignored by a large number of Crafters. It would be better to argue simply
that because there are multivocal approaches regarding the definition of
Wicca, every writer should make it clear which definition they are uti-
lizing, something that has been too often neglected in the past.
Bibliography
Adler, Margot. Drawing Down the Moon: Witches, Druids, Goddess-Worshippers and
Other Pagans in America. London: Penguin, 2006 [1979].
Bracelin, Jack. Gerald Gardner: Witch. London: Octagon Press, 1960.
Budapest, Zsuzsanna. The Holy Book of Womens Mysteries Volume I (revised edition).
Privately published, 1986 [1979].
Buckland, Raymond. The Tree: The Complete Book of Saxon Witchcraft. York Beach, Me.:
Weiser, 1974
. Witchcraftthe Religion. Brentwood, N.Y.: The Buckland Museum of Witch-
craft and Magick, 1966.
Chakraverti, Ipsita Roy. Beloved Witch: An Autobiography. New Delhi: HarperCollins
India, 2000.
Clay-Egerton, A. R. Coven of the Scales: The Collected Writings of A.R. Clay-Egerton.
London: Ignotus Press, 2002.
Clifton, Chas S. Her Hidden Children: The Rise of Wicca and Paganism in America.
Lanham, Md.,: AltaMira Press, 2006.
Cochrane, Robert. The Craft Today, Pentagram 2, November 1964.
. The Robert Cochrane Letters: An Insight into Modern Traditional Witchcraft. Mil-
verton, Somerset: Capall Bann, 2002.
Crowley, Vivianne. Wicca: The Old Religion in the New Millennium. London: Harper-
Collins, 1996
Crowther, Arnold, and Patricia Crowther. The Witches Speak. Douglas, Isle of Man:
Athol Publications, 1965.
Cunningham, Scott. Wicca: A Guide for the Solitary Practitioner. St. Paul: Llewellyn,
1998.
Farrar, Stewart. What Witches Do: A Modern Coven Revealed. London: Peter Davies,
1971.
Field, Arnold. Yes I Am A Witch.The Daily Dispatch, 5 August 1954.
Finnin, Ann. The Forge of Tubal Cain. Sunland, Calif.: Pendraig, 2008.
Gardner, Gerald. The Meaning of Witchcraft. London: Aquarian Press, 1971 [1955].
. Witchcraft Today. London: Rider, 1954.
Glass, Justine. Witchcraft, the Sixth Senseand Us. London: Neville Spearman, 1965.
Grimassi, Raven. Italian Witchcraft: The Old Religion of Southern Europe. Woodbury,
Minn.: Llewellyn, 2000.
Griffiths, Bill. Aspects of Anglo-Saxon Magic. Hockwold-cum-Wilton, Norfolk: Anglo-
Saxon Books, 1996.
Guiley, Rosemary. The Encyclopedia of Witches, Witchcraft & Wicca. New York: Check-
mark Books, 2008.
Gwyn. Light from the Shadows: A Mythos of Modern Traditional Witchcraft. Chieveley,
Berkshire: Capall Bann, 1999.
Harvey, Graham., Listening People, Speaking Earth: Contemporary Paganism. London:
C. Hurst & Co, 2007.
Heselton, Philip. Wiccan Roots: Gerald Gardner and the Modern Witchcraft Revival.
Chieveley, Berkshire: Capall Bann, 2000.
Howard, Michael. Modern Wicca: A History from Gerald Gardner to the Present. Wood-
bury, Minn.: Llewellyn, 2009.
Huson, Paul. Mastering Witchcraft: A Practical Guide for Witches, Warlocks & Covens.
New York: G.P. Putnams Sons, 1970.
Hutton, Ronald. The Triumph of the Moon: A History of Modern Pagan Witchcraft.