Sunteți pe pagina 1din 3

Call for a substitute to river sand in construction

1st January 2002


�Seminar organised by the Geology Old Students' Association, University of Kerala (GOSAN),
highlighted the need for alternative materials in the construction industry to substitute river sand.

Presiding over the seminar, the Vice-Chancellor, B. Ekbal, called for the development of
appropriate housing technology using environment-friendly materials. He underlined the need for
a radical change in the housing culture by avoiding wasteful spending on costly and scarce
resources. He said it was necessary to educate the people on the feasibility of alternative
construction materials.

The District Collector, K.R. Jyothilal, who inaugurated the seminar said the administration was
finding it difficult to enforce the High Court restrictions on extraction of river sand due to the
pressure exerted by powerful lobbies. He said unauthorised sand mining was rampant along the
Vamanapuram and Karamana rivers.

Mr. Jyothilal suggested that river management committees work in close coordination with gram
panchayats for regulated extraction of sand from specific locations. He said crushed rock was a
viable alternative to river sand. ``Development of substitute materials should be part of the
strategy to minimise the requirement of river sand for the construction industry. This can be
achieved only by improving the interface between industry and research institutions,'' he said.

The chairman of the Science, Technology and Environment Committee, M.R. Das, and the GOSAN
president, K.P. Thrivikramji, also addressed the inaugural function.

In a paper presented at the technical session, M.B. Raju and E. Shaji of the Central Ground Water
Board, said that indiscriminate sand mining was responsible for the water crisis in many parts of
the State during summer months. They said the removal of sand from river beds had increased
the base flow of ground water to the rivers.

The paper pointed out that sand mining from river beds was also responsible for sea water
intrusion through backwaters and river mouths. Due to unscientific mining, sufficient quantity of
sand does not reach the river mouth or estuaries to make natural barriers along the coast. Due to
this, sea water and sea sand enter the backwaters and rivers.

Citing case studies, the paper observed that the Paravur lake was filling up with sea sand while
wells in the proximity were subject to saline intrusion. Sand mining from the Periyar river had led
to sea water ingress. The paper suggested desiltation of all irrigation ponds and percolation tanks
which would contribute a considerable amount of sand.

In his presentation, P.T. Chacko of the Department of Geology called for setting up a dynamic
sand inventory with a regional machinery for planning and monitoring of exploitation. He
suggested that the inventory with a digital, geo-coded or GIS system could be set up with a part
of the fund raised by sale of sand. Mr. Chacko advocated a river basin approach to sustainable
exploitation of river sand.

A.S.K. Nair of the Centre for Earth Science Studies proposed a process-response model which includes
assessment and availability of sand on a micro watershed basis with people's committees and NGOs to
enforce regulated mining. He said it was important to examine sand mining on an integrated approach
examining the scientific, socio-economic and political aspects of the problem.

Many of the speakers said crushed rock was emerging as an acceptable alternative to river sand in the
construction industry.
When Pemagatsel became a separate dzongkhag, development activities began to pick up momentum. The
construction of roads and other infrastructure meant increased demand for natural resources like stone,
gravel and sand, among others. With no major river in nearby, river-bed sand has never been readily
availability or reasonably affordable, thus escalating the cost of construction.

At minor constructions like roadside drains and retaining walls, transporting river-bed sand all the way from
Samdrup Jongkhar has proven too difficult. This has forced government agencies, contractors and even
project DANTAK to seek an alternative to sand.

In Pemagatshel, there is an alternative, one that is commonly called Monglin Aggregate. This fine powdery
gravel, in its natural form, has been in use right from the time of the introduction of development activities
in the dzongkhag. The quarry is located in Monglin, about eight kms away from the Pemagatshel proper.

“People were mining this fine gravel as far as I can remember,” said Samten Chhofel, a contractor residing
in a nearby village. Today, this gravel is also known as “Chhofel Aggregate” because of the fact that he has
been supplying it since the late 1990’s.

“If sieved properly, it can be used even for the superstructure although its long term durability is not
known,” said Samten Chhofel, pointing to a section of his house with walls built using the fine stone
aggregate.

He even claims that the local aggregate requires less cement to sand ratio. Further down the road, a
workshop owner, Wangchuk, also maintains that the concrete works best when used with less cement. He
went a step further by saying that the concrete mix also sets faster compared to the ones using river-bed
sand.

Gurung, a DOR engineer, said that while the fine local stone aggregate can be used for the construction of
drains, retaining walls and PCC works, it is not recommended for other structural works. “The field testing
lab of the department has approved the use of it for works other than structural ones.” He however disagreed
with the ratio of the mix. “Contrary to what the people claim, more cement needs to be used if it is used as
ersatz sand,” he said.

A visit to the source reveals the extent of its use over the years. It looks like a mini mine minus man and
machineries. It comes to life only when there is demand from contractors. While the forestry division issues
need-based permits, many prefer buying from Samten Chhofel who keeps ready labour.

Today, this fine aggregate which can be extracted without much effort, is a boon for local contractors. The
entire roadside drain along the dzongkhag highway has been built using the local sand. It has, in fact, been
so widely used in construction works that many attribute the cut-throat competition among contractors to the
locally available cheap alternative to sand and aggregate.

A truck load of river-bed sand from Samdrup Jongkhar costs more than Nu 5,000, including transportation
up to Pemagatsel. The local fine stone aggregate or powder is available for anywhere between Nu 1,500-
2,000 within the locality, including transportation.

Graded aggregates, however, cost more because of the extra work involved. It is still much cheaper than
what is available at Samdrup Jongkhar. A cubic foot of graded aggregate which costs more than Nu 20 in the
border town is far cheaper in Pemagatshel. With the new township at Denchi likely to come up soon, the
demand for Monglin/ Chhofel aggregate is likely to skyrocket. The eminent demand has made Samten
Chhofel initiate plans to go into fulltime mining of the stone aggregates. His name is already a brand.
1. Good.It is good to read people of Bhutan has alternative for river sand.We r supplier of bitumen from
Saudi arabia and supplier of sand manufacturing machines.Our machine manufacture sand from
rocks.If Butanese requie sand machines in future please contact me @phone ++919443161089,fx+
+914562261386.3/830 S R Naidu Nagar,Sattur -626203.INDIA