Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
AN 2, SEM.1
Homework
VIII. Match the terms that indicate various forms of understandings with the correct
definition; provide their equivalents in Romanian; use these terms to fill the blanks in the
sentences under B below; translate the sentences into Romanian.
Treaty, accord; alliance; compact; convention; covenant; pact; entente; entente cordiale;
bargain; bond; charter; concord, contract; deal; settlement; agreement; protocol; pledge;
understanding.
A.
Treaty - . 2. an agreement under international law entered into by actors in international law,
namely sovereign states and international organizations.
Alliance - 11.a union or association formed for mutual benefit, especially between countries or
organizations.
Convention - 3.an international agreement, especially one dealing with a specific matter, as
postal service or copyright.
Covenant - 12.an agreement in writing under seal, as to pay a stated annual sum to a
charity/(Bible) Gods promise to the Israelites and their commitment to worship him alone.
Entente cordiale - 8.the understanding between Britain and France reached in 1904, forming
the basis of Anglo-French cooperation in the First World War.
Bargain - 13.an agreement between two or more people or groups as to what each will do for
the other.
Deal - 19.an agreement entered into by two or more parties for their mutual benefit, especially
in a business or political context.
Agreement - 10.a negotiated and typically legally binding arrangement between parties as to a
course of action.
Protocol - 14.the original draft of a diplomatic document, especially of the terms of a treaty
agreed to in conference and signed by the parties.
B.1. We have an agreement with them that we wont compete directly. 2.He thought for a long
moment, knowing no peace understanding could be reached with the Indians. 3. A protocol on
the religious orders was concluded in 1904, but had not received the assent of the Senate in
1908. 4. In 1893 a deal was made with the Eastern and South Africa Telegraph Company for the
construction of a cable from Zanzibar to the Seychelles and Mauritius, over a distance of 2210
m. 5. The event also contributed towards the conclusion of an entente between Turkey and
Rumania in the summer of 1910.6. The parties have not been able to reach/negotiate a
settlement in the case. 7. It was only when the impossibility of realizing the "Northern Pact"
became patent that his influence began to wane, and Russia sacrificed millions of roubles
fruitlessly in the endeavour to carry out his pet scheme.8. It favoured an Anglo-French entente
cordiale, seeing therein a substantial guarantee for the due carrying-out of those pacts. 9. In
April 1695 he was impeached once more by the Commons for having received a bribe of 5000
guineas to procure the new contract for the East India Company. 10. The Pope in October
signed an alliance binding him to withdraw his troops from Parma and Piacenza.11. These naval
victories were followed by a further military treaty with France against Spain, termed the treaty
of Paris (the 23rd of March 1657). 12. A tenant is not responsible, under such a ?, for
deterioration due to diminution in value caused by lapse of time or by the elements./ A
covenant is a religious covenant described in the Bible, applying to all humanity, and is
principally an agreement made between God and man. 13. By the year 1431 the faade was
nearly completed, and Contarini made a concord with Martino and Giovanni Benzon for the
marbles to cover what was yet unfinished. 14. At the opening of the conference (23rd June
1882) Italy secured the signature of a self-denying ?whereby all the great powers undertook to
avoid isolated action. 15. The compact is an intergovernmental treaty , a new stricter version of
the Stability and Growth Pact, signed on 2 March 2012 by all member states of the European
Union (EU), except the Czech Republic, the United Kingdom, and Croatia. 16. The convention of
the Order with the towns and the Hanse was one great cause of its prosperity until the close of
the 14th century. 17. The charter was a military treaty and association of East European
countries, formed in 1955 by the Soviet Union, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, East Germany,
Hungary, Poland, and Romania, which was dissolved in 1991.18. Herbert resented his wife for
subjecting him to the bond of matrimony. 19. They closed the bargain after a week of
negotiating. 20. The conference ended with a joint pledge to limit pollution.
When Imre Nagys Faction stated that Hungary went out of the alliance, and its backers attacked
the military units- the garrisons of the Soviet army- followed the counterattack and the soldiers
of the Warsaw treaty came back into the country in October 1956, at the order of Jnos Kdr
and his faction and the Hungarian (partially backed by NATO from a moral, military and
especially financial point of view) opposition (improper said if the Soviet troops would have ever
gone away from Hungary) was defeated in 2 weeks time. The forces of the Treaty (agreement) of
Warsaw were also used in August 1968 after the declaration and the starting of the internal
events which took place in the Czech Republic during the Prague Spring, in order to put an end
to the reforms implemented by the Government conducted by Alexander Dubek.Vaclav Prchlik,
Lieutenant General and The Head of the military department of the Czechoslovakian Communist
Party, in a television press conference, had already declared the Treaty of Warsaw as being an
inequitable alliance and said that the Czechoslovakian army was ready to protect, by fighting if
needed, the states sovereignty. On 20th August 1968, a group made up of 23 divisions of the
Soviet army, which was backed by a Hungarian division, 2 east-German divisions, a Bulgarian
division and 2 Polish divisions, entered in Czechoslovakia. Romania was against the intervention
and, as a result, refused to contribute with troops. This military intervention was explained by the
Brejnev Doctrine, which stated that: When forces which are hostile to socialism try to make a
socialist country develop towards capitalism, this fact is not only a problem of the country in
discussion but also a problem and a worry of all the other socialist countries. This doctrine
implicitly empowered exactly to the government of the Soviet Union the right to define
socialism and capitalism according to its own aims.
Articolul 51(1) al Cartei adreseaza Cartea intitutiilor Uniunii Europene, corpuri create sub legea
Uniunii si, la implementarea noilor legi ale UE, statelor membre ale UE. In plus, ambele Articole
Articolul 6 al Tratatului Uniunii amendat si respectiv Articolul 51(2) al Cartei in sine restrang
drepturile Cartei la extinderea competentelor UE. Drept consecinta, UE nu are puterea sa
legisleze reabilitarea/apararea unui drept stabilit de Carta decat daca puterea de a face asta nu
a fost stabilita in Tratatele propriu-zise. Mai mult decat atat, persoanele fizice nu vor putea sa
aduca un stat membru in fata Curtii pentru ca nu au respectat drepturile din Carta, cu exceptia
cazului in care statul membru in cauza a implementat legea. Acest ultim punct a fost subiectul
celor mai multe dezbateri. Carta nu este prima incercare de a pune principiile drepturilor
omului in mijlocul/centrul legii/dreptului Uniunii Europene. Toate statele membre ale UE sunt,
si statelelor candidate li se cere sa fie, semnatare ale Consiliului Conventiei Uniunii Europene cu
privire la Drepturile Omului, astfel ca multe principii din Conventie, precum dreptul la o
judecata corecta, au fost luate drept baza de jurisprudenta a Curtii Europene de Justitie, chiar
inainte de reiterarea formala a acestora in Carta. n interpretarea protectiei drepturilor
prevazuta de principiile generale ale dreptului/legilor UE (descris n seciunea de mai sus a
Curii), CEJ s-a ocupat deja de problem, i anume, dac drepturile protejate de aceste principii
generale au fost aplicate statelor membre .
Dup ce s-a pronunat n Johnston v Royal Ulster Constabulary c dreptul la proceduri echitabile
era unul dintre principiile generale ale dreptului UE, n ceea ce privete Kremzow v Austria, CEJ
a trebuit s decid dac un stat membru era sau nu obligat s aplice principiul i n ceea ce
privete o condamnare greit pentru crim.
Avocaii lui Kremzow au susinut c, acest caz a intrat n domeniul de aplicare al legislaiei UE,
pe motiv c sentina i condamnarea sa iluzorie au nclcat dreptul su la libera circulaie n
cadrul UE.
CEJ a rspuns c, deoarece legile n baza crora a fost condamnat Kremzow nu au fost adoptate
pentru a asigura conformitatea cu legislaia UE, situaia sa a czut n afara domeniului de
aplicare al legislaiei UE.