11/26/2017 Make In India And Make For India Debate: A Students Take On Manufacturing A New India

SIGN IN TO YOUR ACCOUNT Subscribe

ECONOMY
Email
Make In India And Make For India Debate: A Students Take On
Manufacturing
Password A New India
by Darshan Yadav
SIGN IN
Apr 18, 2016, 1:45 pm
FORGOT PASSWORD?

Make In India Logo/Getty Images

Snapshot
The plan to make India a manufacturing power-house through Make in India is laudable.

But one should also be aware of its pit-falls and give adequate weight-age to what the RBI governor has to say: Make in India largely for India.

We need to create a hybrid model which satis es the domestic developmental de cit while giving space for dynamically adjusting to international
economic climate.

Economists are fascinated by the South-East Asian countries export-led growth model and the recent rise of China as a manufacturing super-
power.

After the new Modi government came to power India has put its focus on the manufacturing sector. The Make in India programme aims to
encourage manufacturing in India.

However, even this ambitious plan has come under the long hard look of the RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan. In a famous speech he warned
Close[x]
against the possible perils in pursuing an export-led growth model. His call was for Make in India being largely for India. Rajan has the
credentials of predicting the sub-prime crisis in 2007, therefore it is imperative to critically analyse the issue of Make in India vis--vis Make for
India.
Pro le
Logout

https://swarajyamag.com/economy/make-in-india-and-make-for-india-debate-a-students-take-on-manufacturing-a-new-india 1/7
11/26/2017 Make In India And Make For India Debate: A Students Take On Manufacturing A New India

SIGN IN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Email

Password

SIGN IN

FORGOT PASSWORD?

File Image (Credits: AFP PHOTO/PUNIT PARANJPE/FILES)

The Historical Context

Economic growth of all developed economies has followed a certain clock-like path. The developed countries had primary sector at the frontier
of growth rst, touching on the pre-industrial era; followed by manufacturing industries becoming the centre of the growth providing maximum
revenues and employment to masses; and nally came the phase of transition to service economics, indicating the post-industrial era.

However, India appears to have leapfrogged from primary sector to tertiary sector. This is palpable from the marginal contribution of agriculture
to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) vis--vis the service sector. Service sector contributes 56 % whereas agriculture contributes 18% to GDP. This
apparent success of the Indian service sector or IT sector has worried policy makers because agriculture employs over 50% of the Indian
population. The service sector, being able to provide blue collar jobs only, is incapable of being a mass employer, thus leading to a jobless
economic growth.

The reason behind this discrepancy lies in the lackluster growth of the manufacturing sector. Only the manufacturing sector, with its ability to
absorb labour of low as well as medium skills, can employ masses and help us reap the demographic sweet spot. Aware of all these concerns,
the Government of India embarked upon a mission to turn India into a manufacturing power-house by inviting foreign and local stakeholders to
leverage Indias cheap labour and make it the factory of the world.

The success of the policy adopted for Make-in India is contingent upon trends in the international economy and on domestic issues. This,
essentially, implies that the nature of policy adopted for industrializing India will depend on the state of the world economy, given international
demand has been slow since the crisis and nadir commodity-prices have put serious constraints on exports.

De-Constructing Make-in-India and Make-for-India

Make in India, as stated previously, takes cues from export-oriented growth. Leveraging the cheap labour and other resources to keep costs low
will boost exports to strengthen the domestic production base.

On the other hand, Make for India entails production for consumption in India itself. Given that India is one of the largest consumer markets, the
concept of Make for India could be a gamechanger. Not only does it make our growth independent of the international economic scene, this Close[x]
helps to take care of Indias speci c needs in view of high poverty levels in the country. It builds upon the idea of creating a symbiotic production-
consumption cycle in India itself.
Pro le
Logout
The di erence between the two can be explained with an instance. Say, India exports leather goods. Now the demand for such goods depends
on the economic situation of importing countries which, as of now, do not have good economic prospects. As a result, the leather industry
becomes vulnerable to international markets. However, if those goods were produced for Indian consumers, many hitherto poor consumers will
now be interested in buying more things. This may be more sustainable in the long run.

https://swarajyamag.com/economy/make-in-india-and-make-for-india-debate-a-students-take-on-manufacturing-a-new-india 2/7
11/26/2017 Make In India And Make For India Debate: A Students Take On Manufacturing A New India

Another crucial di erence between the two lies in the focus area. Make in India will be geared on manufacturing as a prime moving force while
Make for India may or may not be solely based on export-styled
SIGN manufacturing. This sectoral favouritism for high growth may not be viable
IN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

given the state of our manufacturing units.

Email
In India, Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) sector is the most labour intensive industrial segment. Reports by OECD assert that 65%
manufacturing employment stems from these MSME units. Hopes of Make in India hinge on this sector.
Password

But the MSME sectors labour productivity is low. If this sector were chosen as a key pillar of growth by giving parental allocation of resources and
SIGN This
credit, it just might end up in a towering number of large ine cient units. IN might further stress the already stressed banks who are reeling

under the high Non-Performing Assets(NPAs). FORGOT PASSWORD?

Make in India also smacks of the old Import Substitution Industrialization. That experiment failed, but it still inspires Indian policy-makers to
make the same old mistake again. This is based on production economics rather than consumption economics. In this epoch of
internationalization of production, producing for import substitution might not be doable. It would be far easier to hack into global chains and be
a part of a larger process rather than creating a secluded zone of production.

The Structural Aspect

The structure of the Indian economy has often put economists on pins and needles, given the fact that despite having high growth rates,
employment has not increased at the same rate as economic growth and poverty still haunts one-third of the population. The truth is that the
growth of the Indian economy has been skewed and an average Indian consumer remains poor.

In this scenario, only a very speci c mode of manufacturing policy can address the need and Make in India does not appear to be solving the
nature of problems India is currently facing. The way it a ects, Make in India versus Make for India debate is our policy choice of producing low
quality goods for Indian markets or producing inexpensive products for foreign consumers. The two choices , however, do not operate in the
same industrial setup; production process will have to be tactically designed speci cally for either choice we make.

The Make for India choice leaves or rather forces us into a low-quality level equilibrium and in future, it might get hard to escape such
equilibrium. Given the market dynamics, it is di cult for manufacturers to re-orient production lines to meet export markets.

Make-in India will require a quantum jump in technological and professional expertise, which only a small workforce in India possesses, and a
very dynamic infrastructure as well as policy environment, which hardly exists. To achieve this model, a large investment in R&D and
infrastructure is needed, but this will re-orient entire manufacturing towards foreign consumers making it di cult for the Indian consumers as
they seek low/medium quality goods and export-quality material is not a ordable to them.

Can The World Accommodate Another China?

If two big economies start competing for producing cheaper goods, it will become a race to the bottom for both. Also in the scenario of both the
economies losing pro ts, it will make the economics of scale of producing cheap products unviable. China has embraced this emerging reality of
lowered world demand and production lines have already started moving, not to India but to Vietnam and other countries. So, our comparative
advantage is being lost to South-East Asian nations who can make things work with rock-bottom labour wages. India with all its labour laws and
regulatory complexities may drop a bundle.
Close[x]

Another key development has been the Trans-Paci c Partnership (TPP) deal. Though it looks like another free trade deal, it has a strong geo-
political angle which is primarily excluding China and India out of the world trade. TPP is a 21st century deal, in regard to its commitment for
higher labour, environmental standards and strong emphasis on Intellectual Property Rights. Pro le
Logout

https://swarajyamag.com/economy/make-in-india-and-make-for-india-debate-a-students-take-on-manufacturing-a-new-india 3/7
11/26/2017 Make In India And Make For India Debate: A Students Take On Manufacturing A New India

SIGN IN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Email

Password
Archives

Blogs
SIGN IN
Opindia
FORGOT PASSWORD?
Search stories
My Pro le

Subscriber Login

TPP Member Countries/Getty Images

Now, given China and India both cannot adhere to these standards, they cannot be a part of this deal. It poses a key danger to Indias Make in
India dream. Our strengths presently do not allow us to become member of the TPP, so until we develop more and can adhere to higher
standards, we should focus on Make for India. A su cient development at home for a decade will make us capable of exporting quality goods
while adhering to all standards.

Whether we choose Make in India or Make for India, it will also a ect the pattern of resource usage. Make in India will orient the resources for
producing high quality goods for foreign consumers. Not only will it decrease the amount of resources available for Indian masses but also
produce goods which have no use for India. This will introduce a luxury bias in Indian production system and it will make the life of millions of
the poor strata more stressful as they wont have cheaper goods.

Make for India, antithetically, might take a decentralized approach to development, where local resources will be used to produce goods for the
local population. India needs this approach mainly because the growth we have had in the last two decades had di erential fruits for di erent
groups. Usage of local resources for outside use has been a universal theme for con ict and under-development. Make for India can help India
have a balanced growth for its population. Inclusive is already a recognized priority in India and should be adopted through Make for India.

Beyond Manufacturing

Make in India shows a continuity with previous approaches of industrialization in India, focusing on non-consumer goods, leading to situations
Magazine
much - Weekend
the same | Print
as that of having a big foreign company producing potato chips for India and earning billions. This calls for tweaking of our
developmental
Politics approach. Make in India shows the same proclivity for skewed growth in view of inter-sectoral parity.

Economy
Make in India almost loses sight of the fact that agriculture is still the key employment provider. Make for India can have a rather di erent
approach
Businesstowards agriculture. We know that India itself has a large consumer base. Ergo, treating agriculture as an industry will solve both the
farmer suicide problem as well as the ubiquitous food in ation problem, which we are facing from the last few years and bound to face it more
Culture
prominently in the future given our growing population.

False Dichotomy
Books & ideas Close[x]

Both Make in India and Make for India are outcomes that generally bode well for India. Though they di er in approach, they have a similar aim of
World
developing India and have considerable overlap. Both need an underlying climate that is crucial for success.
Defence Pro le
Logout
Economies do not grow according to a speci c model, however hard we try. We need to create a hybrid model which satis es the domestic
Infrastructure
developmental de cit while giving considerable policy space for dynamically adjusting to international economic climate. The emerging fourth
industrial revolution essentially requires a blend of Make for India and Make in India.

Science

Technology
https://swarajyamag.com/economy/make-in-india-and-make-for-india-debate-a-students-take-on-manufacturing-a-new-india 4/7
11/26/2017 Make In India And Make For India Debate: A Students Take On Manufacturing A New India
Technology
Whatever be the nal approach we choose, the quintessential pre-requisite is domestic legal/ nancial reforms. India has vexed taxation
structures
Videos having an adversarial taxation bureaucratic environment. The
SIGN IN TO regulatory
YOUR ACCOUNT regime for businesses is still not development friendly
neither for Make in India nor Make-for India. The reforms at home will be the key contributing factor to India becoming an industrial power.
Podcasts
Email
Darshan is a nal year student of Engineering Physics atIndian Institute of Technology.

PasswordRajan, Make in India, NDA government, World Economy,

Tags: Raghuram

Comments +
SIGN IN

FORGOT PASSWORD?
Headlines View All

91 Per Cent Of Gwadar Port
Income Will Go To China:
Pakistan Shipping Minister To
Senate
Mathura Civic Polls: Drones
With Cameras To Be Used To
Maintain Law And Order
Rahul Gandhi Coins New
Term; Says Modis
Hugplomacy With Trump
Failed Because Pakistan Freed
Ha z Saeed
Islamabad Committed to
Implementing UNSC Sanctions
Against Terroist Says Pakistan
To Justify The Release Of Ha z
Saeed

Terrorist Kill Territorial Army Towards An Electric Future: Right Of Internet Access Non-
Jawan, Leave Behind His Uber To Partner With Negotiable, Will Be
Bullet-Riddled Body Mahindra For Electric Cars In Unrestricted: IT Minister Ravi
India Shankar Prasad

Close[x]

Pro le
Logout

https://swarajyamag.com/economy/make-in-india-and-make-for-india-debate-a-students-take-on-manufacturing-a-new-india 5/7
11/26/2017 Make In India And Make For India Debate: A Students Take On Manufacturing A New India

SIGN IN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Email

Password

SIGN IN

FORGOT PASSWORD?

Latest Articles

1 The Forgotten Indian Wizards And The Birth Of Modern Forensics

2 Who Is Trying To Sabotage Our Light Combat Aircraft, The Tejas?

3 In Gravitational Waves, A New And Powerful Way To Speak To The Universe

4 China Beyond Shanghai: What My Journey To Anhui Province Taught Me

Close[x]

Pro le
Logout
5

https://swarajyamag.com/economy/make-in-india-and-make-for-india-debate-a-students-take-on-manufacturing-a-new-india 6/7
11/26/2017 Make In India And Make For India Debate: A Students Take On Manufacturing A New India
BJPs Transformation Into A Resurgent Force Under Modi-Shah Leadership

6 Watch: First Ever Joint Exercise Of Indias Garud Commandos And Israels Elite Unit
669

7 Indias Dangerous Economic Dependence On China, And What The Former Can Do
About It

8 Bankruptcy Code Changes Intended To Save Modi Government The Blushes, Not
Banks

About Swarajya

Swarajya - a big tent for liberal right of centre discourse that reaches out, engages and caters to the new India.

editor@swarajyamag.com

Useful Links

About Us
Subscriptions Support
Editorial Philosophy
Press Kit Close[x]

Refund & Cancellation Policy

Gift Swarajya
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use Pro le
Code of Conduct Logout
Plagiarism Policy

Participate

Contact Us

https://swarajyamag.com/economy/make-in-india-and-make-for-india-debate-a-students-take-on-manufacturing-a-new-india 7/7