Cse-Sar-Tier 2

RAO BAHADUR Y.
MAHABALESWARAPPA ENGINEERING
COLLEGE, BALLARI.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT (SAR)

UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING PROGRAM (TIER II)
FIRST TIME ACCREDITATION
SUBMITTED
TO
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION (NBA)
SUBMITTED
BY
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND

ENGINEERING
Cantonment, BALLARI -583104
Phone: 08392-244809, Fax: 08292-242148
Email-principalrymec@gmail.com
website: www.rymec.in
30 JANUARY 2017
RAO BAHADUR Y MAHABALESWARAPPA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, Cantonment, Ballari. 1

SAR CONTENTS
Sl Page
no CONTENTS
No
05
PART A
06
I Institutional Information
14
PART B
15
II Criterion 1
State the Vision, mission and Program Educational objectives of the Department and 16
1
Institute
1.1 State the Vision and mission of the Department and Institute 16
1.2 State the Program Educational objectives (PEOs) 23
1.3 Indicate where the Vision, mission and PEOs are published and disseminated among 24
Stake holders
1.4 State the process for defining the vision and mission of the department, and PEOs of 25
the program
1.5 Establish Consistency of PEOs with Mission of the Department 53
Criterion 2 57
2 Program Curriculum and Teaching-Learning Processes 58
2.1 Program Curriculum 58
2.1.1 State the process used to identify extent of Compliance of the universityy 58
Curriculum for attaining the program outcomes and Program Specific
Outcome as mentioned in Annexure II .Also mention the identify Curriculum
2.1.2 State the Delivery details of the Content Beyond the Syllabus for the 69
Attainment of Pos and PSOs.
6
2.2 Teaching Learning Processes 69
2.2.1 Describe processes followed to improve quality of teaching & Learning 69
2.2.2 Quality of internal semester Question Papers , Assignments and Evaluation 90
2.2.3 Quality of Student Projects 96
2.2.4 Initiatives related to industry interaction 118
2.2.5 Initiatives related to industry internship/summer training 121
Criterion 3 123
3 Course outcomes and Program Outcomes 123
3.1 Establish the correlation between the Course and the Program Outcomes and Program 124
Specific Outcomes
3.1.1 Course outcome (Cos) (SAR Should include course outcomes of one course 124
from each semester of study, however should be prepared for all course
and made available as evidence, if asked)
3.1.2 CO-PO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1(six matrices to be mentioned; 128
one per semester from 3rd to 8th Semester.
3.1.3 Program level course-PO matrix of all Courses Including first year courses 136
3.2 Attainment of Course Outcomes 138
3.2.1 Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the 138
Evaluation of course outcomes is based.
3.2.2 Record the attainment of the course outcomes of all course with respect to set 142
attainment levels

3.3 Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program 158
Specific Outcomes
3.3.1 Describe assessment tools and Processes used for measuring the attainment 158
of each of the Program outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes
3.3.2 Provide results of evaluation of each PO & PSO 162
Criterion 4 162
4 Student Performance 163
4.1 Enrolment Ratio 166
4.2 Success Rate in the stipulated period of the Program 167
4.2.1 Success rate without backlog in any semester/year of study 167
4.2.2 Success rate Stipulated period 168
4.3 Academic Performance in Third Year 169
4.4 Academic Performance in Second Year 170
4.5 Placements ,Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship 171
4.6 Professional Activities 172
4.6.1 Professional Societies/chapters and organizing engineering events 172
4.6.2 Publication of technical magazines, newsletters, etc. 176
4.6.3 Participation in inter-institute events by students of the program of study 177
Criterion 5 181
5 Faculty Information and Contributions 182
5.1 Student-Faculty Ratio 182
5.2 Faculty Cadre Proportion 184
5.3 Faculty Qualification 186
5.4 Faculty Retention 187

5.5 Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning 188
5.6 Faculty as Participants in faculty development/training Activities/STTPs 189
5.7 Research and Development 189
5.7.1 Academic Research 189
5.7.2 Sponsored Research 189
5.7.3 Development Activities 202

5.7.4 Consultancy (From industry) 202
5.8 Faculty Performance appraisal and Development Systems(FPADS) 206
5.9 Visiting/Adjunct/Emeritus faculty etc. 206
Criterion 6 208
6 Facilities and Technical Support 208
6.1 Adequate and well equipped laboratories, and technical man power 209
6.2 Additional facilities created for improving the quality of learning experience in 217
laboratories
6.3 Laboratories: maintenance and overall ambiance 220
6.4 Project laboratory 222
6.5 Safety measures in laboratories 224
Criterion 7 228
7 Continuous Improvement 228
7.1 Action taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the Pos & PSOs 229
7.2 Academic Audit and action taken thereof during the period of Assessment 238
7.3 Improvement in placement ,Higher studies and entrepreneurship 243
7.4 Improvement in the quality of students admitted to the program 246

Institute Level Criteria 250
Criterion 8 251
8 First Year Academics 252
8.1 First Year Student-Faculty Ratio (FYSFR) 252
8.2 Qualification of Faculty Teaching First Year Common Courses 252

8.3 FIRST YEAR Academics Performance 253
8.4 Attainment of Course Outcomes of first year courses 254
8.4.1 Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which 254
the evaluation of Course Outcome of first year is done
8.4.2 Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all first year courses 258
8.5 Attainment of Program Outcomes of all first year courses 262
8.5.1 Indicate the results of evaluation of each relevant PO and /or PSO ,if 262
applicable.
8.5.2 Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of Pos 270
Criterion 9 272
9 Student Support Systems 273
9.1 Mentoring system to help at individual level 273
9.2 Feedback analysis and reward/corrective measures taken ,if any 275
9.3 Feedback on facilities 276
9.4 Self-learning 276
9.5 Career Guidance, Training ,placement 277
9.6 Entrepreneurship cell 282
9.7 Co-curricular and extra curricular Activities 284
Criterion 10 287
10 Governance, Institutional Support and Financial Resources 287
10.1 Organization, Governance and Transparency 288
10.1.1 State the vision, mission of the institute 288
10.1.2 Governing body, administrative setup, function of various bodies, services 288
rules, Procedures, Recruitment and Promotional Policies
10.1.3 Decentralization in working and grievance redressal Mechanism 293
10.1.4 Delegation of financial Powers 297
10.1.5 Transparency and availabilityy of correct/unambiguous information in 297
public domain
10.2 Budget allocation ,utilization, and public accounting at institute level 298
10.2.1 Adequacy of budget allocation 300
10.2.2 Utilization of allocated funds 301
10.2.3 Availability of the audited statements on the institutes website 301
10.3 Program specific Budget allocation, utilization. 301
10.3.1 Adequacy of budget allocation 301
10.3.2 Utilization of allocated funds 303
10.4 Library and internet 303
10.4.1 Quality of learning resources(hard/soft) 303
10.4.2 Internet 307
III PART C 309
Declaration by the Institution 310

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
PART A
Instutional Information

1
PART A: Institutional Information
1. Name and Address of the Institution: Rao Bahadur Y. Mahabaleswarappa

Engineering College,
(Formerly Vijayanagar Engineering)
Cantonment, Ballari-583104
2. Name and Address of the Affiliating University: Visvesvaraya Technological University,

Jnana Sangama,Belagavi-590018
3. Year of establishment of the Institution: 1980
4. Type of the Institution:

University
Deemed University Government
Aided
Autonomous
Affiliated
5. Ownership Status:
Central Government
State Government
Government Aided
Self financing
Trust
Society
Section 25 Company
Any Other (Please specify)
Provide Details:

6. Other Academic Institutions of the Trust/Society/Company etc., if any:
Year of
Name of the Programs of
Sl.No Establish- Location
Institution(s) Study
ment
Veerasaiva College
1 Veerasaiva College 1945 Non-Technical Campus,Airport Road,
Cantonment, Ballari
Smt. Allum Sri Togari Veerappanavara
Sumangalamma Datti Avarana, Allum
Sumangalamma Road,
2 Memorial Womens Gandhinagar, ballari
College 1969 Non-Technical
Hosapete,Ballari
3 Vijayanagar College
Non-Technical District,Karnataka
1964
Koturu,Ballari
4 Kottureswara College
1967 Non-Technical District,Karnataka
Gangavathi Huvinahadagali, Ballari

Bhagyamma Rural District, Karnataka
5 1970 Non-Technical
College
Ambli Dodda Harapanahalli, Ballari

6 Bharamappa First District, Karnataka
Grade College 1972 Non-Technical
Professional
Colleges
Veerasaiva College
Rao Bahadur Y. Campus, Airport Road,
7 Mahabaleswarapp 1980 Technical
Engineering College Cantonment, ballari
Sha Bhavarlal Babulal

8 Proudhadevaraya Institute Technical Nahar Campus, T.B.
of Technology 1997
Dam, Hosapete
Hanagal Veerasaiva College Campus,

Airport Road, Cantonment,
9 Kumareswara 1997 Technical ballari
Polytechnic
Allum Karibasappa Veerasaiva College Campus,

Institute of Airport Road, Cantonment,
10 1998 Non-Technical ballari
Management(MBA)
11 Vunki Sanna Rudrappa 1975 Non-Technical Kappagal Road, Y. Nagesh

Law College Shastry Nagar, ballari
Togari Veeramallappa Kappagal Road, Y. Nagesh
12 Memorial College of 1985 Non-Technical Shastry Nagar, ballari
Pharmacy
13 Kottura Swamy College of 1963 Non-Technical Ballari,karnataka

Education
Sha Babulal Bhavarlal Sha Bhavarlal Babulal

Nahar College of 2004 Nahar Campus, T.B.
14 Non-Technical Dam, Hosapete
Education
Kappagal Road, Y.
Kottur swamy P.G. studies Nagesh Shastry Nagar,
15 in education 1993 ballari
Non-Technical
PU /High School
Non-
16 Setra Gurushanthappa Pre- 1942 Kappagal Road, Y. Nagesh
University College Technical Shastry Nagar, ballari
Non- Kappagal Road, Y.
17 Kittur Rani Chennamma 1993 Technical Nagesh Shastry Nagar,
Girls High School ballari
Haraginadoni Non-
18 Basavanagowda Pre- 1963 Kuditini, ballari (T) & (Dt)
Technical
University College
Vijayanagar Comp.
Non- T.B.P. Munirabad, Koppal
19 Pre-University 1963 Technical (Dt)
College
Kinnalu Poramambe
Non- Hagaribommanahalli (T)
Grurusiddappa High
20 1968 Technical Tambrahalli ballari (Dt)
School
Non- Hagaribommanahalli (T)

Akki Basamma Thotappa
21 Pre- University College 1997 Technical Tambrahalli ballari (Dt)
Non- Harapanahalli,
Sha Seshaji Hastimal Jain
22 Pre-University College 1999 Technical Davanagere (Dt)
Harapanahalli,
V.V.Sangha High Non-
23 2006 Davanagere (Dt)
School Technical
Vivekananda public Non- Devalapura, ballari Road,

24 1993 Technical Siruguppa, ballari (Dt)
School
Deshanuru
Non- Deshanuru (P),
25 Sadashivareddy High 1999 Technical Siruguppa (T) ballari (Dt)
School

V. V. Sangha's College Road,Hospet

Independent P U
College, Hospet
Non-
26 2014 Technical
V.V.Sangha Independent Non- Veerasaiva College

27 P.U. College 2010 Technical Campus, Airport Road,
Cantonment, ballari
PRIMARY
Heerada Sugamma H.S.M.H.P.School opp.
Non-
28 Higher Primary School 1924 K.S.R.T.C. Bus Stand,
Technical
ballari.
Silver Jubilee Non-

memorial Higher Technical Jumma Masidi Street,
29 Primary School 1954 ballari.
Non- 1st Main, Basaveshwara

Vunki Marisiddamma
30 1993 Technical Nagar, ballari
Primary School
Gandharva Sangeeta Kappagal Road, Y.

Non- Nagesh Shastry Nagar,
31 Vidyalaya 2006 Technical ballari
PRE PRIMARY
32 V. V. Sangha's Non- Veerasaiva College

Kindergarten School, 2014 Technical Campus, Airport Road,
ballari Cantonment, ballari
V. V. Sangha's Non- Hagaribommanahalli (P)

33 Kindergarten School, 2014 Technical ballari (Dt)
Hagaribommanahalli
Vijayanagara Non- Vijayanagar College

34 Kindergarten School, Technical Campus, TBP,
2014
Munirabad Munirabad, Koppal (Dt)

7. Details of all the programs being offered by the institution under consideration:
Sl. Program Name Year of Increase Year of AICTE Approval Accreditation

No. Start Intake in increase Status*
intake,
if any
01 Civil Engineering 1980 40 50 1994 F. 2-15/B-III/RC-MB/93/26885 dated 31/03/1994 15/02/05 to 14/02/08
40 2002 F.No. 770-53-251(E)RC/94 dated 05/06/2002 &19/07/08 to 18/07/11
60 2009 F. No. 770-53-251(E)RC/94 dated 26/06/2009
120 2011 F. No. SW/1-405698242/2011/EOA dated 01/09/2011
02 Mechanical 1980 40 90 1994 F. 2-15/B-III/RC-MB/93/26885 dated 31/03/1994 15/02/05 to 14/02/08
Engineering 120 2009 F. No. 770-53-251(E)RC/94 dated 26/06/2009 &19/07/08 to 18/07/11
03 Electrical & 1983 40 60 2005 F. No. 770-53-251(E)RC/94 dated 19/09/2005 15/02/05 to 14/02/08
Electronics 120 2013 F.No. SW/1-1337581065/2013/EOA dated 19/03/13 &19/07/08 to 18/07/11
Engineering
04 Electroncis & 1983 40 80 1994 F. 2-15/B-III/RC-MB/93/26885 dated 31/03/1994 15/02/05 to 14/02/08
Communication 90 1998 F. No. 770-53-251(E)RC/98 dated 30/07/1998 &19/07/08 to 18/07/11
Engineering 120 2005 F. No. 770-53-251(E)RC/94 dated 19/09/2005
05 Industrial & 1986 30 50 1994 F. 2-15/B-III/RC-MB/93/26885 dated 31/03/1994 15/02/05 to 14/02/08
Production 40 2002 F.No. 770-53-251(E)RC/94 dated 05/06/2002 &19/07/08 to 18/07/11
Engineering
06 Computer Science & 1987 30 60 1994 F. 2-15/B-III/RC-MB/93/26885 dated 31/03/1994 15/02/05 to 14/02/08
Engineering 90 2000 F. No. 770-53-251(E)RC/94 dated 25/10/2000
120 2005 F. No. 770-53-251(E)RC/94 dated 19/09/2005
07 Electronics & 1992 30 40 2002 F.No. 770-53-251(E)RC/94 dated 05/06/2002 15/02/05 to 14/02/08
Instrumentation &19/07/08 to 18/07/11
Engineering
08 Information Science 2000 40 60 2001 F. No. 770-53-251(E)RC/94 dated 15/06/2001 Not Applied
& Engineering
09 Master of Computer 1999 40 60 2008 F.No. 411/KA-034/ET-MCA/99 dated 20/08/2009 Not Applied
Application
10 Master of Business 2006 60 F. No. 770-53-250(E)RC/94 dated 29/08/2006 Not Applied
Administration
11 M. Tech. in 2011 18 F. No. SW/1-405698242/2011EOA dated 01/09/11 Not Applied
Computer Science &
Engineering
Mechanical
Engineering
(Production
Management)
Mechanical
Engineering
(Thermal Power
Engineering)
13 M. Tech. in Civil 2013 18 F. No. SW/1-1337581065/2013EOA dated 19/03/13 Not Applied
Engineering
(Structural
Engineering)
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering (Digital
Communication &
Networking)
8. Programs to be considered for Accreditation vide this application:
Sl.No Programme Name

1. Computer Science & Engineering
2. Mechanical Engineering

9. Total number of employees in the institution:
A. Regular* Employees (Faculty and Staff):
CAY (July 2015- CAYm1 (July2014- CAYm2 (July2013-

June 2016) June2015) June 2014)
Items
Min Max Min Max Min Max
M 124 124 115 133 101 117

Faculty in Engineering
F 44 46 39 49 41 50
M 11 11 11 11 11 12
Faculty in Maths, Science
& Humanities F 8 8 7 7 6 7
M 124 126 137 142 134 140
Non-teaching staff
F 28 30 21 26 24 27
B. Contractual Staff Employees (Faculty and Staff): (Not covered in Table A):
CAY (July 2015- CAYm1 (July2014- CAYm2 (July2013-

Items June 2016) June2015) June 2014)
Min Max Min Max Min Max
M 0 0 3 3 0 0
Faculty in Engineering 0 0
F 0 0 0 0
M 0 0 0 0 0 0
Faculty in Maths, Science
& Humanities F 0 0
0 0 0 0
M 0 0 0 0 0 0
Non-teaching staff
0 0 0 0 0 0
F

10. Total number of Engineering Students: UG
CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

Item
(2015-16) (2014-15) (2013-14)
Total no. of boys 1653 1871 1770
Total no. of girls 1080 1152 1044
Total no. of students 2733 3023 2814
Total number of Engineering Students: PG
CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

Item
(2015-16) (2014-15) (2013-14)
Total no. of boys 122 150 148
Total no. of girls 88 96 107
Total no. of students 210 246 255

11. Vision of the Institution:
To Produce Professionally Excellent, Knowledgeable, Globally Competitive, Socially

Responsible Engineers and Entrepreneurs.
12. Mission of the Institution:
M1: To provide quality education in Engineering and Management.
M2: To establish a continuous Industry Institute interaction, Participation and

Collaboration to contribute skilled Engineers.
M3: To develop human values, social values, entrepreneurship skills and professional
ethics among the technocrats.
M4: To focus on innovation and development of technologies by engaging in cutting
edge research areas.
13. Contact Information of the Head of the Institution and NBA

coordinator, if designated:
i. Name: Dr.Hiregoudar Yerrannagoudar

Designation: Principal
Mobile No: 9448043949
Email id: principalrymec@gmail.com
ii. NBA coordinator, if designated:

Name: Dr.T.Hanumantha Reddy
Designation: Professor
Mobile No: 9448844232
Email id: thrbly@yahoo.com

PART B
Program Level Criteria

CRITERION 1
Vision Mission and Program Educational Objectives

CRITERION 1 Vision ,Mission and Program Educational Objectives 60
I. State the Vision and Mission of the Department and Institute

1.1 Vision of the Institution
To produce Professionally Ex c el l en t , Knowledgeable, G l o b a l l y Competitive

an d Socially Responsible Engineers and Entrepreneurs.
Mission of the Institution
M1 To provide quality education in Engineering and Management.
To establish a continuous Industry-Institute Interaction,

M2 participation and collaboration to contribute skilled Engineers.
To develop human values, social values, entrepreneurship skills and

M3 professional ethics among the technocrats.
To focus on innovation and development of technologies by engaging in

M4 cutting edge research areas.
1.1.1 Vision of the Department
To produce Professionally Excellent, Knowledgeable, Globally Competitive a n d

Socially Responsible Computer Engineers and Entrepreneurs.
Mission of the Department
MD 1 To provide quality education in computer science and engineering.
To establish a continuous Industry Institute Interaction,

MD 2
participation, collaboration to contribute skill ed IT Engineers.
To build human values, social values, entrepreneurship skills and
MD 3
professional ethics among the IT technocrats.
To focus on innovation and development of technologies by engaging in
MD 4
machine intelligence research areas.

The Department of computer science and Engineering aims to provide quality
technical education to students by providing continuous interaction with industry,
collaboration, participation which enables students to build human values, social
values, professional ethics and to develop entrepreneurship skills and to focus on
innovation and development of new technologies.
1.1.2 List of stake holders to define the vision and mission of the department.
STAKEHOLDERS
INTERNAL STAKE EXTERNAL STAKE

HOLDERS HOLDERS
MANAGEMENT ACADEMICIAN
PRINCIPAL ALUMNI
HOD INDUSTRY
FACULTY RESOURCE
STUDENTS PERSON
EMPLOYER
PARENT
Fig 1.1: Stake holders involved in defining the Vision and Mission statement

Internal Stake Holders
Management:
Sl.No. Name Designation

1 Sri Allum Basavaraj President V.V Sangha ,Ballari
12 Y. Satish Vice-President V.V Sangha
1 Ballari
31 Sri Udeda Basavaraj Secretary/Chairman
4 Y. Satish Chairman RYMEC,Ballari
5 V. Nandisha GB Member
6 M. Hanumanthappa GB Member
Attend/participate in orientation programs and awareness workshops organized by the

institute in OBE and Accreditation (OBEA), and be familiar with the system.
Answer and comment on survey question prepared by the institute for OBE and provide their
feedback on curriculum development.
Participate actively in the programs continuous improvement mechanism.
Support the OBE system by providing positive feedback and by designing PEOs for various
programmes.
Distribute the required funds to various programmes.
Upgrade infrastructure to support the requirements of OBE.
Provide funds to update profiles of faculty as required by OBE.
Improve placement potential by introducing OBE sincerely at all levels of the programme
Faculty :
Sl.No. Name Designation Role
1 Dr. H. Yerranagoudar Principal, RYMEC Member
2 Dr.T.Hanumantha Reddy HOD ,Dept of CSE Member
3 Faculty of CSE Faculty Member

The faculty act as facilitator for student to achieve their goals and also involve in
improving their credentials and grow professionally.
The faculty has a professional responsibility to adhere to the VTU curriculum and are
responsible for making curricular through corresponding letters to VTU.
The success of OBE depends on how well the faculty adopts and understands that there
is no such thing as failure, but depends on feedback and the action taken by the faculty in
the continuous improvement system.
Faculty should encourage the students to adopt the OBE process and succeed in their
professional life.
The instructional procedures to be followed by a faculty in OBE system are:
i) Take a responsibility as course owner, mentor, assessor, evaluator, facilitator,
guide and also a learner.
ii) Create a positive learning environment in students so that they can succeed in
their carrier.
iii) Balance the teaching and research work load.
iv) Initiate industry collaborations for setting up the laboratories for providing
internships and industry based projects for our students.
v) Use of modern tools in teaching & learning method and pedagogy systems in all
the courses of the program.
vi) Updating profiles of faculty by attending/presenting seminars /workshops/FDPs
and technical articles.
vii) Organise guest lecture/industry visits/case studies /industry based projects.
viii) Define the roles and responsibilities of Course Coordinators, Program
Coordinators, NBA Coordinator, Program Assessment Committee (PAC)
Members, Department/Program Advisory Board (DAB) Members, Institutional
Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) Members, Board of Studies (BOS) Members, and
Academic Council (AC) Members.
ix) Involve all the faculty in various surveys and information gathering and in
achieving POs and PEOs.
x) List the strengths and weaknesses of the department/programme and support
departments/programme.

xi) Encourage faculty and students to become members of CSI, ASM professional
societies.
Student:

1 Prema K.V Student Member
2 Md Rizwan Student Member
3 Gouthami S Vittal Student Member
Students must be aware of what they should be learning and what they are actually
learning.
Understand the importance of Vision, Mission, POs, PEOs of their programme.
Collect feedback on course structure, facilities, infrastructure, faculty, information
resources, project work, assessments, evaluation, and on the overall OBE system to
establish quality and continuously improve the programme.
Make use of online learning facilities to achieve some of the POs.
Get exposure to various sessions and guest lecturers connected with OBE.
Participate in student surveys and provide feedback.
Provide documentary evidence at unit and Course levels in achieving their COs,
POs, PEOs.
Participate actively in multi-disciplinary, open-ended complex projects, social and
environmental matters, safe practices, ethical matters, contemporary issues, and
project-based learning activities.
Be self-learners and self-centric in attaining their POs, PEOs.
Participate in various learning methods such as; problem based learning,
cooperative learning, project based learning, team based learning, group discussions
activities, and collect documentary evidence to fulfil the achievement of POs and
PEOs.

External Stakeholders
Parent :

1 A. Gururaja Parent Member
2 B. Thimmappa Parent Member
3 P.Chennana Gowda Parent Member
Parents are external stakeholders expect the institution selected to provide quality education for
their children, to enhance their career prospects.
The roles and responsibilities are as follows:
Attend/Participate in orientation programmes and awareness workshops organized by the
department with respect to OBE and Accreditation (OBEA).
Participate in surveys prepared by the department for OBE and provide their feedback in
curriculum development.
Participate actively in the quality improvement programme/continuous improvement
mechanism.
Support the OBE system by providing positive feedback and in designing PEOs for
various programmes.
Advice and support their wards in achieving the POs, PEOs and in OBE.
Encourage their wards to participate in various learning methodologies in OBE.
Support the managements efforts to provide the best infrastructure and facilities to
maintain the quality of education.
Alumni :

1 Shiva Prakash Vastrad Alumni Member
2 Khaja Moinuddin Alumni Member
3 Santosh Kumar .P Alumni Member
4 Shivkumar Alumni Member

The Alumni take pride in the educational institution from which they graduated.
Attend/participate in orientation programs and awareness workshops organized by the

institute in OBE and Accreditation (OBEA), and be familiar with the system.
Answer and comment on survey question prepared by the institute for OBE and provide their
feedback on curriculum development.
Participate actively in the programmes continuous improvement mechanism.
Support the OBE system by providing positive feedback and by designing PEOs for various
programmes.
Participate and conduct guest lectures, industry awareness seminars and industry experience
workshops in their respective industry.
Help, guide and counsel students towards achieving their POs and PEOs.
Industry :
Attend/ participate in orientation programmes and awareness workshops organized by the
institute in OBE and Accreditation (OBEA) and be familiar with the system.
Answer and comment on survey questions prepared by the institute for OBE and provide
their feedback on curriculum development.
Participate actively in the programmes quality improvement and continuous
improvement mechanism.
Support the OBE system by providing positive feedback and in designing PEOs for
various programmes.
Coordinate with faculty and students and get their feedback in the new OBE system.
Collaborate with the institute for on-the-job training, for internship, for industry-based
projects and interact with them to achieve the POs.
Participate actively in Industry-Institute Interaction partnership cell.
Help to develop Incubation Centres with facilities to cover all programs in OBE.
Participate and cooperate in organizing guest lectures, industry site visits, problem
solving, case studies, industry based projects and design.

Academician :

1 Dr. Guruprasad Academician Member
2 Dr. Balasubramani Academician Member
3 Dr. Balakrishna Academician Member
4 Dr.Guru Academician Member
5 Dr.Basavaraj Kattegeri Academician Member
6 Dr. K. Suresh Academician Member
Represent the major end users of product (students). Helps in providing important
feedback on expected graduate student profile they would like to recruit.
Provide important feedback on future trends at national and global level.
Important link in bridging the gaps between Institution and Industry.
1.2 State the Program Educational Objectives(PEOs)
Table 1.1: Programme Educational Objectives
Graduates of computer science & engineering course will have successful

PEO 1 professional career
Graduates of computer science & engineering course will pursue higher.

PEO 2
Education
Graduates of computer science & engineering course will have ability for
PEO 3 lifelong learning
PEOs of the computer science and engineering were developed through direct
engagement of faculty and advisory board which was represented from major company
employees as well as alumni thus the PEOs are designed to have successful professional
carrier and help them to pursue higher education and will have ability for lifelong learning
The above said expected accomplishment for graduates will be for 4-6 years. The Program
Educational Objectives (PEOs) support and are in consonance with the Mission of the

Institution and the department. The attempt was to define PEOs as broad based, general
statements that describe the career and professional accomplishments that the program is
preparing our graduates to achieve - describe long term program targets or directions of
development and to ensure that the Program Educational Objectives (PEOs).
1.3. Indicate where the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published and Disseminated
among stakeholders.
The Vision and Mission are published in
Institute Website www.rymec.in
Department Website http://www.rymec.in/cs.aspx
Cover pages of Internal Assessment and Assignment Books, Lab records and lab manuals.
Departmental News Letter - Prerana
RYMEC CSE apps
Department Staffroom & HOD Chamber.
Department Laboratories
Department Notice Boards
Class Rooms
Display Boards
The Vision and Mission are disseminated during the conduction of
Workshops
Seminars
State Level Tech Fest
Conferences
Faculty Development Programs
Training Programs for Students

We convey Vision and Mission during the first day of each academic semester by HOD &
respective class coordinators and also convey the same through departmental associations such
as departmental forum. Apart from these Vision and Mission are disseminated to all the
stakeholders of the programme through faculty meetings, student awareness workshops,
student induction programme, Alumni meetings and parent meetings.
1.4 Mention the process for defining Vision and Mission of the Department
The department established the Vision and Mission through a consultative process involving
both the internal and external stakeholders. Views collected are summarized and finalized in
line with NBA, AICTE, VTU and RYMEC. Processes for Defining the Vision and the Mission
of the Department is shown in the figure 1.2 below

University Vision and Mission
Inline with
University
Institute Vision and Mission
Define Department Vision and

Mission Statements
Interacting with
Internal stake holders External stake holders
Management Faculty Student Parent Industry Alumni

s s
Views from
stakeholders No
are satisfied
Yes
Department vision and mission statements are

framed
Fig 1.2 : Process of defining Department Vision and Mission

1.4.1 Steps for Defining the Vision and the Mission of the Department:
1. Vision and Mission of the institute and the University are considered as the basis defining
Department Vision and Mission. The department vision and mission must be in line with
institute vision and mission.
2. To define the vision and mission of the department, vision and mission of institute
and University are considered as the inputs.
3. Vision and mission statements are defined by interacting with internal stakeholders:
management, faculty, students and external stakeholders: parents, industry experts,
alumni and collecting their views about program.
4. Views collected from the stakeholders are thus summarized and finally checked for
satisfaction.
If views drawn from the stakeholders are satisfied, then the department vision and mission
statements are framed, otherwise the department vision and mission must be redefine and
stakeholders must collectively met until the vision and mission are framed

Process for Defining the Programme Educational Objectives:
Institute and department Program Outcomes

vision and mission
Define program educational objectives
Interacting and Collecting Views

Faculty
Students
Parents
Alumni
Academicians
Industry Experts BOS,BOE Advisory

board
Employers
PEO are framed

Communicating
through letters
Access PEO
Process of
Design and implement redefining
Yes
PEO No changes in curriculum
Program is Satisfactory
Met and teaching learning
process
Fig 1.3 Stake Holders involvement/relevance in the process for defining the PEOs of the
Department

Steps for Defining the Programme Educational Objectives:

1. Collect the Mission and Vision statement of the Institute and the Department/ programme
and the programme outcomes.
2. Define the key stakeholders of the program such as: students, faculty, parents, academicians,
alumni, industry experts, employers, BOE, BOS advisory board.
3. Interact with the stakeholders and collect their views on the desirable attributes of the
programme.
4. Define the program education objectives with respect to the Institute Mission and Vision
statement and the views of the stakeholders.
5. Access and evaluate the set of programme educational objectives periodically in the
continuous improvement process.
6. Design and implement changes in the curriculum and the teaching learning process, to
achieve the programme educational objectives.
7. Redefine the PEO to accommodate the changes that are implemented in step-6 and thereafter
repeat from step-1 to step-6.

Formulation and review of our PEOs are represented by flowchart as shown in the
figure 1.3. The discussion that immediately follows pertains to this flowchart.
Input to formulation and review of PEO
The department draws upon constituents input to construct and periodically revise our
PEOs. Data are collected from constituents in various ways, some formal, systematic, and
some not. We have learned that some modes of input are much more effective than others in
generating useful information, and constantly improving our processes for gathering input
from constituencies in response to these experiences.
Current Students:
We consider the input of our current students in the establishment and review our PEOs,
with their knowledge or experience in the academics.
Employee:
Feedback from employers plays a key role in the formulation and review of the
PEOS. Employee are at the leading edge of the practice of the profession, and they give us
early indications of new trends in it. In addition, we find that they have general opinions
about the preparation of computer engineers as a whole, and this is useful in guiding the
formulation of our PEOs. We gather information from employees via both formal surveys
and various informal activities. In these interactions with employees we enquire about their
views on the definition of computer engineering, and correspondingly what our goals
should be in educating our students. Regular input from employees is obtained via the
following interactions

Employer Survey:
The survey is used to inquire about an employee perception regarding both the
appropriateness and achievement (described elsewhere) of our PEO. In short, we present our
PEO and ask the employee to rank the appropriateness of each on a 1 to 4 scale (1 = not
appropriate, 4 = extremely appropriate). In the future, we plan to extend our survey efforts to
a broader audience, including individuals that supervise our cooperative students, recruiters
that visit campus, and direct supervisors of our alumni.
Focus groups:
With a regularly constituted advisory board dedicated to the Department of Computer
Science & Engineering, we have elected to gain formal input from small ad hoc industrial
focus groups, which periodically meet for short periods, and which again provide
opportunities for a much more diverse. We regularly invite industrial personals to conduct
seminars and technical talks. These events provide employee with a more formal presentation
of the Departments program activities. These events considers various aspects of the
Undergraduate program, focusing particularly on the PEO, and whether the
Program Outcomes are formulated well enough to bring them about.
Position profiles:
Many companies construct and disseminate position profiles for their employees that
enumerate the skills and responsibilities that accompany various positions (e.g. Test
Engineer, Software developer, System Admin etc.). These documents often provide an
indication of the expected timeline for promotions from one position to another.
Selected companies have been kind enough to provide us with these documents. Such
information provides us with an outline of the skills and aptitudes our students should master

within a specified time from graduation. When reviewing our PEO we examine the
consistency between our PEO and the competencies expected by our employers.
Recruiter visits:
Department representatives have lunchtime or other discussions about the undergraduate
curriculum with recruiters and visiting companies during placement drives.
R&D Center:
The Department has strong research and educational interactions with a few local industries,
and w e interact regularly with representatives of t h e s e concerns. Employees of t h e s e
companies sometimes contribute lectures to courses taught.
1.4.2 PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES (PSO)
The department of computer science and engineering has framed the

following Program Specific Outcomes in consult with concerned stakeholder and
corresponding Committees
Table 1.2: PSO Statements
PSO 1 Ability to model, design and implement computer network systems to

meet specified requirements.
PSO 2 Ability to build software engineering system of varying complexity.

Steps for framing the program specific outcomes
The following steps outline the procedure for framing Program Specific Outcomes.
Department of CSE considered the Program Outcomes defined by National Board of
accreditation for framing of Program Outcomes
In the presence of Program Assessment Committee, Program Coordinator and the internal
and external stakeholders views on framing the program Specific outcomes was collected
The summarized views on program Specific outcomes with Program Outcomes are thus
framed.
Fig 1.4 Process for framing Program Specific Outcomes

1.4.3 Administrative system that helps in ensuring the attainment of the PEOs
The department of computer science and engineering has constituted the following
committees for ensuring the attainment of the PEOs .The names and the
responsibilities of the committees are shown in the following table below.
Institutional Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC)

Responsibilities
1. Prepares work plan for all programs in the institution.
2. Supervises and guides the activities of department Committees and Teams.
3. Act as a mentor body for all departments committees and teams.
4. Establishing Mission & Vision for institution and department
5. Plans various development, delivery and assessment activities of PEOs and POs
at the institution level.
6. Prepare an outcome-based assessment plan (OBAP) with broad structure across all
programmers to assess PEOs and PO attainment.
7. Effective participation of the stakeholders and process implementation administrators,
faculty, alumni, employers, industry experts and current students.
8. Obtain results of assessment of internal and external stakeholders including analysis of
Student performance in tests, exams, assignments projects etc. from Programme
Assessment Committee PAC
9. Assumes responsibility of assessing availability of required resources and
needed for achieving PEOs and POs for each programme based on the departmental
Committees recommendations.
10. Present the results to the management for improvements or corrective action. Based on
directions/decisions Programme Assessment Committee initiate corrective actions in
revision of PEOs and POs

Sl.No Name Designation Role
1 Y.SATISH REDDY CHAIRMAN GOVERNING COUNCIL,

2 V.NANDISHA MEMBER RYMEC, BALLARI
GOVERNING COUNCIL,
3 M.HANUMANTHAPPA MEMBER RYMEC, BALLARI
GOVERNING COUNCIL,
4 DR. HIREGOUDAR MEMBER RYMEC, BALLARI
PRINCIPAL
5 YERRANAGOUDAR
DR.T HANUMANTHA REDDY MEMBER HOD-CSE
6 DR. SAVITA SONALI MEMBER VICE-PRINCIPAL
7 DR. PRADEEP JOYTHI MEMBER HOD-EEE
8 DR. H.M. MALLIKARJUNA MEMBER HOD-CIVIL
9 DR. KORI NAGARAJ MEMBER HOD-MECHANICAL
10 SHIVAPRAKASH VASTRAD MEMBER ALUMNI ,
11 SHIVAPRAKASH VASTRAD MEMBER ALUMNI , DIRECTOR , NIC,
12 KHAJA MOINUDDIN. L MEMBER BELLARI
ALUMNI , M . D ALIZA
13 DR. V.C. PATIL MEMBER CONSULTANCY
ALUMNI , PRINCIPAL ,
14 MR. CHANDRASHEKARGOUDA MEMBER BITM, BALLARI
ALUMNI
15 SANDEEP K MEMBER ALUMNI
16 SIDDHARTH HIREMATH MEMBER ALUMNI
17 SANJEEV PRASAD MEMBER ALUMNI
18 GANESH GOUDA MEMBER PARENT
19 NAGARAJ ACHAPPA MEMBER PARENT
20 RAMESH.H MEMBER ALUMNI
21 PROF.BALAJAYANALU MEMBER PARENT
22 K.H.VRUSHABHENDRAPPA MEMBER PARENT
23 B.R. GADAGIN MEMBER ACADEMICIAN
24 DR.K.B.PRAKASH MEMBER ACADEMICIAN
25 DR. RAJASHEKHAR MEMBER ACADEMICIAN
26 DR.BANAKARA BASAVARAJ MEMBER ACADEMICIAN
27 ANUSHA.K MEMBER STUDENT
28 SHIVA RAM MEMBER STUDENT
29 MS. POORNIMA .T.R MEMBER STUDENT
30 T.K.GOURI MEMBER STUDENT
31 PRIYANKA MEMBER STUDENT
32 PRIYANKA MEMBER STUDENT
33 SREENIVASA RAMANUJAM MEMBER HR MANAGER TCS

34 SUNIL T.S MEMBER G.M, AlS, Bangalore

35 T.S. GOUD MEMBER Vice- President
36 KUTUBHIN BASHA MEMBER [Construction],
AEE, JSW,
Gescom, Ballari
37 VISWAMURTHY MEMBER Tornagallu
Managing Director, Havels
Blue, Ballari
Display Committee
Responsibilities
1. Develop special content about Accreditation process being followed which would be
accessible through institutional website
2. Display PEOs and POs on the website
3. Publish newsletter or information brochure to inform stakeholders about the
accreditation process and its progress
Sl.No. Name, Designation & Program Role

1 Sri. Pradeep Jyothi, Assoc. Prof.-EEE Convener
2 Sri M R Vijaykumar, Assoc. Prof.-Civil Member

3 Sri. Chandrashekar Hiregoudar, Assoc. Prof IPE/Mech Member
4 Sri. K Suresh , Asst. Prof. CSE Member

5 Sri. Phanindra Reddy , Asst. Prof. ECE Member
6 H Vinayakumar Asst.Prof. EEE Member
7 Sri. M L Mallikarjuna Swamy Asst.Prof. E&I Member
8 Sri. Virupaksha Gouda , Asst.Prof. - IPE Member
9 Sri.Nagaraja Gouda , Asst.Prof. ISE Member

10 J S Ravi Kumar , Asst.Prof. MBA Member

Training Placement Entrepreneur Cell (TPEC)
Responsibilities
1. To interact with industries and arrange placements for final year students.
2. To invite personnel from companies to brief placement opportunity in various fields.
3. Arrange Placement training programmes to students periodically.
4. Arrange in and off campus interviews sufficiently to the student.
5. Create MOU with core companies.
1. Dr.T.Hanumantha Reddy Professor Training Head
2. K.K Gururaj Professor Placement Head
3. Vinay Gadigi Asst. Professor Asst. Placement Office
4. Shadhakshari Asst. Professor Civil-Dept. Co-ordinator
5. H.Chidananda Asst Professor CSE-Dept. Co-ordinator
6. K.Lingaraj Asst Professor CSE-Dept. Co-ordinator
7. Mahantesh H M Asst Professor ISE-Dept. Co-ordinator
8. A. Sharanabasappa Asst. Professor EEE-Dept. Co-ordinator
9. P.K. Pavan Kumar Asst. Professor Mech-Dept. Co-ordinator
10. Veerabhadrappa Algur Asst. Professor IPE-Dept. Co-ordinator
11. Sreekanth Asst. Professor ECE-Dept. Co-ordinator
12. Girija Vani Asst. Professor E&I-Dept. Co-ordinator
13. A.M. Swamy Asst. Professor MCA-Dept. Co-ordinator

Research & Development Committee (R&DC)
1. Motivate staff and student to involve in research activities
2. Motivate staff/students for paper presentation, article writing and project work etc
3. Motivate staff to publish research paper in International Conference / Journal
4. Arrange lecture on Research methodologies to Staff/Students for creating research

awareness
5. Motivate staff to write text book also
6. Apply for Seminar Grants from AICTE and take projects from research organization like
DRDO, DST, CSIR, ISRO etc in all departments with the guidance of HODs
1 Dr. Heregoudar Yerranagoudar Professor Convener
2 Dr.K.Veeresh Professor Member
3 Dr.T.Hanumantha Reddy Professor Member
4 Dr.Savita Sonali Professor Member
5 Dr.H.M Mallikarjuna Professor Member
6 Dr.S.M Shashidar Professor Member
7 Dr.B Vijay Kumar Professor Member

Alumni Association Committee (AAC)
Responsibilities
1. To collect the data base of alumni for past five years

2. Invite Alumni to college for important functions
3. To conduct alumni meet in every year on fixed date
4. Create network between Alumni, present final year students and teachers for
creating more
5. awareness about employability an current trends in industry
6. Maintain database of passed out students and communicate the college events
as and when conducted
1. Dr. Heregoudar Yerranagoudar Professor President
2. Dr. T. Hanumantha Reddy Professor & HOD Vice president
3. Dr. C. Thotappa Professor Secretary
4. Dr. H.Girisha Professor Treasurer
6. Phanindra Reddy Asst. Professor Joint Secretary
7. D.Sai Madhavi Asst. Professor Joint Secretary

Institutional Amenities Core (IAC)
Information about hostels
Hostel In charge/coordinators
1 Hostel List of boys hostel and Girls hostel
Total strength in boys and girls hostel
Feedback on hostel facilities
Number of buses and drivers

2 Transport
System to maintain the transport system
Availability of Psychological and Psychiatry counselling
3 Medical
Specify councillors, bio data, and
4 NSS Information about activities carried by NSS
5 Sports &gym Information about activities carried by Sports and Gym
Fire measure fighting

Safety and common
6
facilities
Safety civil structure
Information about common facilities
7 Cultural cell Information about co and Extracurricular activities
Annual event on cultural program


1. Dr. K. Veeresh Professor Convener
2. Dr. Savita Sonali Vice- Principal Member
3. Dr.T Hanumantha Reddy HOD,CSE Member
4. Dr. S.M. Shashidhar HOD, EEE Member
5. Dr. H.M. Mallikarjuna HOD, CIVIL Member
6. Dr. Kori Nagaraj HOD, MECHANICAL Member
7. S.Chandrappa EST-Superintendent Member
8. P. Ravindranath Exam-Superintendent Member
9. Prakasaiah Accounts-Superintendent Member
10. T. Chandrashekhar Accounts-Superintendent Member
Program Assessment Committee (PAC)
Responsibilities
1. Program Assessment Committee consists of Program Coordinator, Course
Coordinator and faculty representatives.
2. Chaired by Program Committee, the committee monitors the attainment of PO and
PEOs.
3. Evaluates program effectiveness and proposes necessary changes
4. Prepares periodic reports those records on program activities, progress, status or other
special reports for management.
5. Motivates the faculty and students towards attending workshops, developing projects,
working models, paper publications and research
6. Interact with students, faculty, Program Coordinators, Course Coordinator and
outside/community agencies (through their representation)in facilitating program
educational objectives
7. PAC meets at least once in 6 months to review the program and submits report to
Department Advisory Committee.

1. Dr.T.Hanumantha Reddy HOD Co-ordinator
2. Dr. H.Girisha Associate Professor Member
3. D.Sai Madhavi Associate Professor Member
4. Sapna Kulkarni Associate Professor Member
5. Nagaveni Biradar Associate Professor Member
Program Coordinator (PC)

Responsibilities
1. Interacts and maintains liaison with key stake holders, students, faculty
Department Head and employer.
2. Monitor and reviews the activities of odd and even semester in program
(III/V/VII & IV/VI/VIII) independently works with course coordinators
3. Schedules program work plan in accordance with specifications of program

objectives and outcomes
4. Oversees daily operations and coordinates activities of program with
interrelated activities of other programs, departments or staff to ensure
optimum efficiency and compliance with appropriate policies, procedures and
specifications given by HOD.
5. Conducts and interprets various surveys required to assess POs and PEOs.

1. Dr.T.Hanumantha Reddy HOD Co-ordinator
2. Dr.H.Girisha Associate Professor Event Coordinator
3. J.Nagesh Babu Associate Professor IA & QP Coordinator
4. D.Sai Madhavi Associate Professor Time Table Coordinator
Nagaveni BiradarLingaraj.K Associate Professor Department Budget

5. Allocations &
/Assistant Professor
Utilization Coordinator
Kavitha.J/R.P.Rajeshwari /
6. Assistant Professor Faculty Coordinator
Sarvar Begaum
Swetha Ramana.D.V /Suresh.K

7. Assistant Professor Project Coordinator
Dr.Anuradha S.G
8. Associate Professor Parent Coordinator
J.Nagesh Babu/ ampapathi.B.M Associate Professor
9. Alumni Coordinator
Assistant Professor
Aparna K.S / Extra Curricular

10. Assistant Professor
Activities Coordinator
11. Shiva Prasad K.M Assistant Professor Student Coordinator
Vani.N /Sridevi Malipatil
12. Assistant Professor Result Coordinator
13. Sunitha.S Assistant Professor Course file Coordinator
Roshan.D Pampapathi.B.M News Letter/Magazine
14. Assistant Professor
Coordinator

Course Coordinator (CC)

Responsibilities
1. Coordinates and supervise the faculty teaching the particular course in the module
2. Assess the Attainment of COs by conducting course exit surveys and updates the
course delivery and assessments methods.
3. Responsible for assessment of the course objectives and outcomes
4. Recommend and facilitate workshops, faculty development programs,
meetings or conferences to meet the course outcomes
5. Analyzes results of particular course and recommends the Program coordinator
and/or Head of the Department to take appropriate action
6. Liaise with students, faculty, program coordinator and Head of the Department to
determine priorities and policies.

1. D.Sai Madhavi Associate professor Coordinator
2. R.P Rajeshwari Assistant Professor Member
3. Vani .N Assistant Professor Member
4. Sridevi Malipatil Assistant Professor Member
5. Afsar Baig Assistant Professor Member
6. Shivaraja.P Assistant Professor Member

SAR Committee (SAR)

Responsibilities
1. Ensure PEOs and POs are clearly defined and updated continuously
based on assessment result of direct and indirect assessment
2. Ensure course contents are aligned to PEOs and POs.
3. Ensure the improvement in design, delivery and attainment of PEOs and POs
which is to be reported to NBA.
4. Ensure course files are maintained with requisite contents by each faculty
5. Assignment, Test, Quiz, Projects, Laboratory experiments are aligned with PEOs, POs
and COs.
6. Elicit the data from all stake holders that is required for preparation of SAR
1 Dr.T.Hanumantha Reddy HOD Co-ordinator
2 Dr.H.Girisha Associate Professor Member
3 J.NageshBabu Associate Professor Member
4 Dr. S.G.Anuradha Associate Professor Member
5 V.Shiva Kumar Assistant Professor Member
6 K.Suresh Assistant Professor Member
7 K.S.Raghu Kumar Assistant Professor Member
8 Naveen Kumar.B Assistant Professor Member
9 R.Sampath Kumar Assistant Professor Member
10 Bergi veeresh Gouda Assistant Professor Member
11 Puneeth G.J Assistant Professor Member

Department Advisory Comittee (DAC)

Responsibilities
1. DAC consists of head of the department, program coordinators, and

the representatives of key internal and external stake holders.
2. DAC chaired by head of the department, receives the report of the Assessment Committee
3. To monitors the progress of the program and devices plan to improve PEO, PO
attainment result.
4. DAC on current and future issues related to programs.
5. Develops and recommends new or revised program goals and objectives.
6. DAC meets at least twice in a year to review the programs.
7. To collect the Industrial Visit (IV) / Guest Lecture (GL) list from all HODs.
8. To prepare the Industrial Visit (IV) / Guest Lecture (GL) date wise and monitor the
same and to check at least 2 Industrial visita and 2 Guest Lecture for each classes and
outstation Industrial Visits is permitted only for final year students.
9. Submit the request in prescribed format for Industrial Visit/Guest Lecture to the
P rincipal/Director for approval
time.
12. Industrial Visit report and feedback of Guest Lecture must be submitted to Principal
for perusal and approval


1 Dr.T Hanumantha Reddy Professor & Head Coordinator
2 Sreenivasa Ramanujam HR Manager TCS Technical Advisor
3 H.Chidananda Asst Professor Member
4 Lingaraj .K Asst Professor Member
5 Naveen Kumar.B Asst Professor Member
6 Shivapraksh vastrad Alumni Member
7 Khaja moinuddin . L Alumni Member
8 Ganesh gouda Parents Member
9 B.R. Gadagin Academician Member
10 Shivaram Student Member
Members at Institutional level Committees:- (IQAC, DC, TPEC, R&DC, AAC, and IAC)
Institutional
Name Designation
Sl.No. Committee
1 Dr.T Hanumantha Reddy Professor & Head IQAC/TPEC

2 Dr.H.Girisha Professor TPEC
3 H.Chidananda Assistant Professor TPEC
4 J.Nagesh Babu Associate Professor AAC
5 D.V Swetha Ramana Assistant Professor IAC
6 K.M. Shivaprasad Assistant Professor News Letter /Magazine

1.4.4 MODE OF ASSESSMENT OF PEO
Graduates of computer science & engineering course will have successful

professional career
PEO 1.1 strong educational foundation in mathematics, science and computer science
PEO1 & engineering
PEO 1.2 informed leaders, effective communicators who work efficiently with diverse
teams
Graduates of computer science & engineering course will pursue higher
education
PEO 2 Higher graduate studies
PEO2
Graduates of computer science & engineering course will have ability for
lifelong learning
PEO 3.1 aptitude for lifelong learning will be engaged in learning, understanding,
PEO3 and applying new ideas and technologies.
PEO 3.2 Professional conduct and interpersonal skills
PEO1 can be assessed in either direct form ( By considering semester end results)
once in a semester or in indirect form ( By considering no of students placed after
graduation) once in a year
PEO 2 is assessed by indirect form by taking alumni survey or by considering

GRE/TOFEL scores
PEO3 can be assessed by conducting alumni survey, employer survey etc which is a
indirect form once in a year

1.4.5 Contribution of Curriculum
Table 1.3: Contribution of Curriculum
Course Curriculum content

Component ( % of contribution ) PO PE0
Applied science 9/62 14% 2 PEO 1,2,3

& Humanities
Professional
core engg 50/62 80% 10 PEO 1,2,3
subjects
Electives 4/62 6% 02 PEO 1,2,3

Curriculum Content ( % of contribution )

6%
Applied science &
14% Humanities
Professional
core engg
subjects
Electives
80%
Fig 1.5: Percentage of curriculum contribution

1.4.6 Establishment of the correlation between the POs and PEOs

Table 1.4: Mapping PO PEO
Programme
Educational Programme
Objectives Outcomes
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
PEO I x x x x x x x x x x x
PEO II x x - - - - - x x x x
PEO III x - x x - - - x x - -

Establishment of the correlation between the POs and PEOs

Table 1.5 : Mapping PO PEO
Programme Programme Outcomes

Educational 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
2
Objective
PEO I 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2
s
--
PEO II 1 2 3 3 2 1 -- -- -- -- 1
3
PEO III 2 3 3 2 -- 2 - 1 2 -- --
High : 3 Medium : 2 Low : 1

1.5. Establish consistency of PEOs with Mission of the Department (15)
In the following table consistency shown on a weighted relationship and

qualitative relevance is shown as slightly, moderately and substantially (1, 2, 3)
MISSION COMPONENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT

PEOS
To provide quality education in computer science
Graduates of computer science & and engineering
engineering course will have successful To establish a continuous Industry Institute
professional career Interaction, Participation, collaboration to
Graduates of computer science & contribute job oriented skilled IT Engineers
engineering course will pursue higher To build human values, social values,
education entrepreneur skills and professional ethics
among the IT technocrats
To focus on innovation and development of
Graduates of computer science & technologies by engaging in machine
engineering course will have ability for intelligence research areas
life long learning
Table 1.6 : Mapping PEO-Mission Statement
PEO PEO MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4

Statements
Graduates of computer science & engineering

PEO 1 course will have successful professional career 3 2 1 --

PEO 2 course will pursue higher education 3 -- -- 2

PEO 3 course will have ability for lifelong learning 3 2 1 3
Note: slightly, moderately and substantially and the cell left blank if
there is no correlation between PEOs and Mission statement

The Program Educational Objectives of the computer science and engineering are in line with the
mission of the department as presented above table 1.7. The table no describes the correlation of
the PEO with the mission of the department. The qualitative relevance is shown as high (3),
moderate (2) & low (1) and relative weights are shown in parenthesis.
The correlation obtained is in the range of 67% to 83.3%. The table below represents the
correlation obtained between PEO1, PEO2 &PEO3 with MD1, MD2, MD3 &MD4 respectively.
Table no 1.7 Percentage correlation of PEOs with Mission
PEO PEO Statements MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 Percentage

%
PEO1 Graduates of Computer Science & 3 2 1 - 67%
Engineering course will have
successful professional career
PEO2 Graduates of Computer Science & 3 - - 2 83.3%
Engineering course will pursue higher
education
PEO3 Graduates of Computer Science & 3 2 1 3 75%
Engineering course will have ability
for lifelong learning
100% 67% 33% 83.33%
There are four corner-stones of our department mission that are reflected within our PEOS:
Quality Education
Industry institute interaction
Entrepreneurship & Ethics and
Innovation in Research & development
MD1: Quality education: PEO1, PEO2 & PEO3 are consistent with the MD1 of meeting with
high standards in the view of providing successful professional career, higher education and
lifelong learning.
MD2: Industry institute interaction: PEO1 & PEO3 are successful professional career and
lifelong learning are consistent with the MD2 in providing the graduates capable of professional
development, lifelong learning and practicing as skilled IT technocrats.

MD3: Entrepreneurship & Ethics: PEO1 is successful professional career and is consistent
with MD3 with producing graduates contributing their social environmental, economic, ethical
values & entrepreneur skills. The graduates of our institution contribute to the society by taking
part in activities or projects involving in environmental issues, green computing, social issues &
community related projects.
PEO3 lifelong learning is consistent with MD3 in a view to produce our graduates to
adapt to the constantly evolving advancements by engaging in lifelong learning by up gradation
their knowledge.
MD4: Innovation in research & development: PEO2 & PEO3 are consistent with MD4 with
the mission of producing our graduates prepared for pursuing higher education and capable of
engaging in the process of research and scientific discovery in the area of machine intelligence.

Mode of Assessment of PEOs

Table 1.8: PEO Assessment Tools and justification
Mode
of Assessment Assessment Data
PEO Assess Tool Criteria Collection Committee
ment frequency
How many students
Course passed with Once in PC
performan distinction/First SEM
Direct ce class
Number of students Training
Placeme placed in Once in and
PEO1.1 nt campus year Placement
Indirect record interviewof students
Number Once in Cell
placed after graduation year
PEO1.2 Indirect Higher GATE/ Once in Program
PEO1 Studies GRE/TOEFL/ year Assessment
CAT Committee
How comfortable were Alumni
Alum you in the Once in Association
ni training/initial months year Committee
surve in your first Program
PEO2 PEO2.1 y
Higher employment
GATE/GRE Assessment
Indirect Studies/G /TOEFL/ CAT Once in Committee
A TE How satisfied are you year2
After (PAC)
Alumni
Employer with the performance years of Association
score graduation
PEO3.1 Indirect Survey of our graduates Committee
How comfortable were

you in the Alumni
Alumni
survey training/initial months Once in Association
PEO3.2 Indirect in
Howyour first
comfortable were year Committee
PEO3
employment
you in the Alumni
Alum training/initial months Once in Association
PEO3.2 Indirect ni in your first year Committee
surve employment
y

CRITERION 2
Program Curriculum and Teaching Learning
Processes

Program Curriculum and Teaching

CRITERION II 120
Learning Processes
2. Program Curriculum and Teaching Learning Processes
2.1. Program Curriculum
2.1.1. Process to identify the compliance of University Curriculum for attainment of
Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes.
Computer Science & Engineering Department curriculum affiliated to Visvesvaraya
Technological University (VTU), Belgaum, Karnataka comprises of General (2%), Basic
Science (5%), Engineering Science and Technical Arts (15%), and Professional Subjects
(78%). The program curriculum is in compliance with AICTE norms.
Table 2.1: Comparison of Program structure of AICTE with VTU structure as followed
by Department of Computer Science & Engineering, RYMEC
Program structure AICTE Norms (%) VTU (%)

General 5-10 2
Basic Science 15-25 5
Engineering sciences and Technical Arts 15-25 15
Professional subjects 55-65 78
Referring university curriculum (Annexure 2.1.1.a) all the courses are mapped with
twelve Programme outcomes (Annexure 2.1.1.b) and gaps are identified and schematic
representation of all courses is prepared. Few of the subjects prescribed by the university are
not fully in compliance with PO 8 Ethics, PO10 Communication and PO12- Lifelong
learning.

University
Curriculum
Web Industry
Framing of Course
Outcomes for each
course by faculties
COs mapped to
POs and PSOs
Approval
by PAC?
Consolidation of
CO-PO-PSOs
mapping
Curriculum Gap
PAC Identification

Approval
by PAC?
Design Content
beyond syllabus to
fill the Gap in
curriculum
Content beyond
syllabus COs
mapped to POs and
PSOs
Fig 2.1: Flow diagram showing process for identifying the compliance of university
curriculum
Table 2.2: The percentage compliance of subjects with all the POs individually has been
tabulated below.
2015-2016
POs
PSO 1
PSO 2
PO 10
PO 11
PO 12
PO 1
PO 2
PO 3
PO 4
PO 5
PO 6
PO 7
PO 8
PO 9
Percentage
73.3 73.3 73.3 73.3 63.3 83.3 73.3 73.3
compliance 70 70 70 80 70 70
with 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Pos(%)

Fig 2.2: Percentage compliance with POs(%)
The gaps identified has been mitigated by organizing seminars and workshops, personality
development programs, inviting experts to give talks and interact with students and site visits.
Contribution of Curriculum (2010 Scheme)
Table 2.3: Contribution of Curriculum (2010 Scheme)
Curriculum
Course
content( % of
component
contribution )
1. Applied science
7/63=11.11%
& Humanities
2. Professional core
engineering 50/63 =79.36%
subjects
3. Electives 5/63=9.53%
a. Applied science & Humanities = 7 subjects
b. Professional core engineering = 50 subjects
c. Electives = 5 subjects

Total number of subjects in curriculum ( semesters 1 to 8 ) = a + b + c = 7 + 50 + 5 = 63
Fig 2.3: Curriculum Contribution (2010 Scheme)
Table 2.4: Balance of Theory and Practical
Balance of Theory and Practicals
Component %Contribution
Theory 67
Practical 17
Tutorial 16
Theory : 4 hours per subject ( 6 subjects per semester) = 24 hrs/Week
Practical : 3 hours per subject (2 subjects per semester) = 6 hrs/Week
Tutorial : 1 hour per subject (6 subjects per semester ) = 6 hrs/Week
Total hours = 36 hrs/Week
Percentage contribution for Theory = (24/36)*100 = 67%
Percentage contribution for practical = (6/36)*100 = 17%

Percentage contribution for Tutorial = (6/36)*100 = 16%
Fig 2.4: Balance of Theory & Practical contribution
Table 2.5: Prerequisite Details for the Scheme 2010-2015
SEM SUBJECT WITH CODE PREREQUISITE DETAILS

CCP (10CCP13) BASIC CONCEPTS OF COMPUTER AND
BASIC ELECTRONICS(10ELN15/14) PROGRAMMING BASICS ELECTRONICS
I/II SEM ENGG. PHYSICS(10PHY12/14) BASICS PHYSICS
ENGG.CHEMISTRY(10CHE12) BASICS CHEMISTRY
ENGG. MATHS-I(10MAT11) BASICS MATHS-I
ENGG. MATHS III BASICS MATHS AND ENGG. MATHS I/II
BASIC ELECTRONICS
BASIC CONNECTIONS & TRUTH TABLE
DMS(10CS34) BASIC OF MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION
FIBONACCI SERIES
III Sem MATRICES & SET THEORY
DS(10CS32) BASICS OF C
LD(10CS33) BASICS GATES AND BOOLEAN ALGEBRA
BASIC CONCEPTS OF COMPUTER AND
OOPS(10CS36)
PROGRAMMING
DS LAB(10CSL37) BASICS OF C
ENGG MATHS-IV(10MAT41) BASICS MATHS AND ENGG. MATHS I/II/III
BASICS OF TREES
DIJKSTRAS SHORTEST PATH,SPANNING TREE
IV SEM GT(10CS42)
PERMUTATION AND COMBINATION ,
POLYNOMIALS
DESIGN AND ANALYIS OF BASICS OF C LANGUAGE

ALGORITHMS(10CS43)
COMPUTER ORGANISATION(10CS46) BASICS OF LOGIC DESIGN SUBJECT
OOPS
SE(10IS51)
ENGG. MANAGEMENT
SS(10CS52) BASICS OF MICROPROCESSOR
BASICS OF PCD
V SEM UNIX SHELL PROGRAMMING
OS(10CS53)
BASICS OF MICROPROCESSOR AND COMPUTER
ORGANISATION
DBMS(10CS54) RELATIONAL ALGEBRA,FUNCTIONS
FAFL(10CS56) SET THEORY
UNIX SYSTEM PROGRAMMING(10CS62) BASICS OF UNIX SHELL PROGRAMMING
CN-II(10CS64) BASICS OF CN-I
CD(10CS63/10IS662) BASICS OF FLAT
VI SEM CG(10CS65/10IS665) MATHEMATICS CONCEPTS, C LANGUAGE
PROBABLITY THEORY,LINEAR ALGEBRA,GRAPH
OR(10CS661/10IS661)
THEORY CONCEPTS
USP LAB(10CSL68) BASICS OF UNIX SHELL PROGRAMMING
OOMD(10CS71) BASICS OF C++
WP(10CS73) BASICS OF CLIENT-SERVER TECHNOLOGY,
BASICS OF PROGRAMMING
ACA BASICS OF CO,BASICSOF OS
VII SEM
JAVA/J2EE(10CS753/10IS753) BASICS OF OOPS
BASICS STRUCTURESOF CLASS
C# AND .NET
BASICS OF OOPS
NETWORKS LAB(10CSL77) BASICS OF CN-I/II
BASICS OF SE
SA(10IS81) BASICS OF CN
BASICS OF OOPS
VIII SEM SSM(10CS82) MATHEMATICS BASICS
ST(10CS842) BASICS OF SE
BASICS OF CN-I/II , OOPS,
Project Work (10cs85)
DBMS,JAVA&J2EE,c##& .NET

Schematic Representation of subjects(2010 Scheme)
Fig 2.5: Schematic representation of subjects
Table 2.6: Contribution of Curriculum (2015 Scheme)
Curriculum
Course
content( % of
component
contribution )
1. Applied science 10/34=30%
& Humanities
2. Professional core
engineering
14/34=70%
subjects
3. Electives -

Fig 2.6: Curriculum content (% of Contribution)
Table 2.7 :Prerequisite Details for the Scheme 2015-2016
SEM SUBJECT WITH CODE PREREQUISITE DETAILS
15MAT11-Engineering Maths-I Basic Maths
15PHY12/15PHY22-Engineering Physics Basic Physics
15CIV13/23-Elements of Civil Engineering -
15EME14/24-Elements of Mechanical Engineering -
15WSL16/26-Workshop Practice -
15PHYL17/27-Engineering Physics Lab Basic Physics
15CPH18/28-Constitution of India & Professional Ethics Basic History
I/II Sem 15MAT21-Engineering Maths II Basic Maths + Engg Maths-I
15CHE12/15CHE22-Engineering Chemistry Basic Chemistry
15PCD13/23-Programming in C & Data Structures Basic Concepts of Computer
15CED14/24-Computer Aided Engineering Drawing -
15ELN15/25-Basic Electronics Concepts of Electronics
Computer Programming Laboratory Knowledge of C
15CHEL17/27-Engineering Chemistry Laboratory Engg Chemistry
15CIV18/28-Environmental Studies -

15MAT31 Engineering Maths III Engg Maths I & II
15CS32 Analog & Digital Electronics Basic Electronics
15CS33 Data Structures & Applications Programming in C & Data Structures
15CS34 Computer Organization -
15CS35 Unix and Shell Programming -
15CS36 Discrete Mathematical Structure Basic Math Concepts
15CSL37 Analog & Digital Electronics Laboratory Analog & Digital Electronics
15CSL38 Data Structures Laboratory Data Structures & Appications

III/IV Sem
15MAT41 Engineering Maths IV Engg Maths I, II, III
15CS42 Software Engineering -
15CS43 Design & Analysis of Algorithm Programming in C & Data Structures
15CS44 Microprocessor & Microcontrollers Computer Organization
15CS45 Object Oriented Programming with JAVA Programming in C
15CS46 Data Communication -
15CSL47 Design & Analog of Algorithm Laboratory Design & Analysis of Algorithm
15CSL48 Microprocessor Laboratory Microprocessor & Microcontroller
Schematic Representation of subjects (2015 Scheme)

Fig 2.7: Schematic representation of subjects (2015 Scheme)
2.1.1.2. Identified Gaps for 2010 Scheme:
Ethics, an important component of professional course needs more space in the
curriculum design. (PO 8)
The essential communication skills, soft skills are beyond the scope of prescribed
curriculum ( PO 10 )
Ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of
technological change. ( PO 12 )

Fig 2.8: Identified Gaps in Program Outcomes
2.1.2. State the delivery details of the content beyond the syllabus for the
attainment of POs and PSOs
A letter with Ref: //RYMEC/CSE/2015-16/7 Dated: 1/7/2015 to The Registrar, VTU,
Belgaum was written regarding the non-compliance of Program Outcomes PO 6 Engineer
and Society and PO 7 Environment and Sustainability of new NBA process ( June 2015) with
VTU prescribed Curriculum for CSE department.
Course Delivery Methods used in our department:
Lectures
Tutorials
Presentation(Still and Video)
Experimental Laboratory Work
Group tasks (Projects)
Handouts

Blended Learning
Hand Signals
Minute Paper
No Hands Up
Course Delivery
Attainment of POs Justification
Methods
Information or teach students about a
particular subject.
Lectures are used to convey critical
information, history, background,
theories and equations.
Lectures are used to relate
engineering practice with ethical
Lecturing 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 issues.
Lectures are also used to expose the
students to contemporary issues and
the need for life-long learning in the
appropriate societal context.
In academia as a quick, cheap
and efficient way of
introducing large numbers of
students to the above
Presentations are given to illustrate
ideas and concepts in intricate
graphics form.
Presentations give information with
Presentations (Still and data relating to an issue.
1, 2, 3 , 4, 10, 11, 12 Videos effectively communicate the
Video)
working of actual engineering
solutions and their impact.
Presentations are always followed by
discussions

Laboratory work demonstrates how

theory can be verified by experiments
through interpretation of results.
Experiments are normally done in
groups so students learn to work in
Experimental 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5, 9, 10, 11, teams.
Laboratory Work 12 Experiments give a realization that
hardware keeps changing thus a life-
long learning is necessary and that
apparatus can be converted into
products/hardware that is used in real
engineering practice.
Projects are taken in groups of 2-3
students.
Students are guided by faculty
members.
Projects are taken on a large variety
of problems and many a times of a
Group Tasks (Projects) 6, 7 , 9, 10, 11, 12
multidisciplinary nature.
Projects are both theoretical and
experimental.
Projects reports are written and
presented with open discussion.
Handouts are given to supplement

lectures.
Handouts contain information for
wider understanding of the philosophy
Handouts 1, 2, 11 of a subject and how it relates to
contemporary world.
Handouts give information on the
history of engineering and its impact
on society.
Blended learning is a formal
education program in which a student
learns in part through delivery of
content and instruction via digital and
online media.
Blended Learning 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 12 Face-to-face classroom methods are
combined with computer mediated
activities.
Blended learning is also used in
professional development and training
settings.

Hand signals range from students

raising their hands to respond to a
question posed by the teacher to a
Hand Signals 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 12 group. thumps up/down signal to
determine students acknowledged
understanding of a concept or process
The minute paper is an informal
assessment technique that asks
Minute Paper 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 12 students a simple question about some
aspects of the class that they can
answer in a minute.
A No Hands Up rule gives the
whole class thinking time to prepare a
response, before the teacher chooses a
No Hands Up 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 12 student. Another approach is allowing
hands up only when a student has a
question of his/her own.
Delivery details of the content beyond the syllabus for the attainment of
POs and PSOs
2016-17
Date- Resource Relevance

Sl. % of
Gap Action Taken Month- Person with to POs
No students
Year Designation and PSOs
End-to-end Aptitude
training + Resume 18-08- TCS PO 9, 10,
Building, GD, PI 2016 to Specific 11, 12
1. Tips and tricks to TCS specific Training 22-08- Training 90
crack GD and PI 2016 from PSO 1,
Communication & FACENOW PSO 2
soft skills
PO 9, 10,
29-7-2016
Communication & Universal 11, 12
Campus Placement to 30-07-
2 Personality Education 90
Cracker 2016
development Bangalore PSO 1,
PSO 2

TCS Pre PO 9, 10,

18-07- Placement 11, 12
Placement
3 Pre-placement talk 2016 Talk from 90
preparation
Santosh, PSO 1,
TCS BLore PSO 2
2015-16

Sl % of
Gap Action Taken Month- Person with to POs
no students
Year Designation and PSOs
PO 9, 10,
21-03-16 Universal
Communication Training on 11, 12
to 23-03- Education
1 & Personality communication & soft 90
16 Bangalore
development skills PSO 1,
PSO 2
Universal PO 9, 10,
27-01-16
Communication Training on Education 11, 12
to 31-01-
2 & Personality communication & soft Bangalore, 90
16
development skills India. PSO 1,
PSO 2
SMART
Training PO 9, 10,
27-01-16
Resources 11, 12
Personality Training on personality to 31-01-
3 India Pvt 90
development development 16
Ltd PSO 1,
Chennai PSO 2
End-to-end
Aptitude training
Focus
+ Resume PO 9, 10,
27-01-16 academy for
Building, GD, PI 11, 12
to 31-01- career
4 Tips and tricks Invigorate 90
16 enhancemen
to crack GD and PSO 1,
t
PI PSO 2
Bengaluru
Communication
& soft skills
Universal PO 9, 10,
Communication Training on 21-9-16 to
Education 11, 12
5 & Personality communication & soft 22-09-16 90
Bangalore
development skills
PSO 1,

PSO 2
Quantec
Quantitative Origin PO 9, 10,
aptitude Training on Quantitative TCS 11, 12
25-9-2015
6 Verbal aptitude aptitude, Verbal aptitude specific 90
Soft skills and Soft skills Training. PSO 1,
Bangalore PSO 2
PO 9, 10,
21-03-
2016 to Universal
& Personality communication & soft 85
23-03- Education
7 development skills PSO 1,
2016
PSO 2
PO 9, 10,
27-01-
2016 to Universal
8 & Personality communication & soft 85
23-03- Education
development skills PSO 1,
2016
PSO 2
SMART PO 9, 10,
27-01-
Training 11, 12
Personality Training on personality 2016 to
9 Resources 85
development development 23-03-
India Pvt PSO 1,
2016
Ltd PSO 2
End-to-end
Aptitude training
focus
+ Resume PO 9, 10,
27-01- academy for
Building, GD, PI Training on 11, 12
2016 to career
10 Tips and tricks communication & soft 85
23-03- enhancemen
to crack GD and skills PSO 1,
2016 t
PI PSO 2
Communication
& softskills
2014 2015

S.No % of
Gap Action taken Month- Person with to POs,
students
Year designation PSOs
1 Engineer and Spiritual talk 8th Oct Sri Sri Sri PO6, PO 8,
Society, Ethics 2015 Nirbhayananda PO 12
Saraswati 90
Swamiji,
President,

RamaKrishna
Mission, Gadag
2 Communication Training on 21st & PO 3, PO 5,
& soft skills Communication 31st Jan PO 9,PO 10,
& soft skills by 2015 PO 11, PO
QUANTEC
TCS, Bangalore 78 12
ORIGIN
PSO 1, PSO
2
3 Communication Training on 11 & PO 3, PO 5,
th
& soft skills Communication 12 Oct PO 9, PO
& soft skills by 2014 QUANTEC 10, PO 11,
75
TCS, Bangalore ORIGIN PO 12
PSO 1, PSO
2
4 Communication Training on 5th to PO 3, PO 5,
& soft skills Communication 14th Jan PO 9, PO
& soft skills by 2014 QUANTEC 10, PO 11,
78
TCS, Bangalore ORIGIN PO 12
PSO 1, PSO
2
2013 - 2014
% of
S.No Gap Action taken Month- Person with to POs,
students
1 Communication Training on 12th Oct Tech PO 3, PO
& soft skills Communication 2013 Mahindra 5, PO 9,
& soft skills PO 10, PO
85 11, PO 12
PSO 1,
PSO 2
2 Communication Training on 10th Tech PO 3, PO
& soft skills Communication Sept Mahindra 5, PO 9,
& soft skills 2013 PO 10, PO
11, PO 12
50
PSO 1,
PSO 2
2012 - 2013
%
S.No Gap Action taken Month- Person with to POs,
students
1 Communication Training on 25th to QUANTEC 50 PO 3, PO

& soft skills Communication 30th ORIGIN 5, PO 9,

& soft skills by July PO 10, PO
TCS, Bangalore 2013 11, PO 12
PSO 1,
PSO 2
Fig 2.9: Number of programs conducted on content beyond syllabus
2.2. Teaching-Learning Processes
2.2.1. Describe processes followed to improve quality of Teaching and learning
2.2.1.1. Initiatives and implementation details of Improving Instruction Methods
Department calendar of events is well planned ahead of the commencement of the
semester based on college calendar of events Which consists of the activities
planned from the gaps in attaining the POs , internal exam dates, assignment
submission dates, display of internal marks etc.
Subject allotment is done well ahead and lesson plans ,course plan, soft and hard
copies of the lecture notes are kept ready

The faculties of department adopt various innovative Teaching & Learning
methodologies to create the best learning environment for student.
These methodologies include traditional black board teaching, presentations,
video lecturing, collaborative learning methods are used where every concept is
explained with real world illustrations, design and problematic aspects are
conveyed by a short cut method.
The faculties are now oriented towards Outcome based Education (OBE) and are
actively utilizing the OBE to cater the learning needs of students by innovative
way.
Before the start of semester the faculties are allotted with subjects to be thought
for upcoming semester, then the faculties define COs, CO-PO mapping and also
prepare a lesson plan and action plan for the subject.
The planned lessons are delivered to students with the active participation of
students in every class, in every subject, the students are assessed for their
participation in OBE class using an alternative assessment tools like flip
classrooms, Quiz, read and summarize, poster presentation, mini projects etc.,
The faculties also use simulations/power point presentations to explain process or
algorithms or concepts like OSI, TCP/IP, extreme Programming, and the
programming subjects are thought in hands on sessions in laboratory.
Students are advised to take MOOCS Courses Massive Open Online Courses, and
Watch NPTEL videos and inform students to write assignments, presentations or
group discussions etc to improve their basic knowledge, communication level in the
respective subject.
Department Calendar of events is prepared in line with VTU and College calendar of
events. All the activities in the department are planned well before semester. The

Program co-coordinator along with HOD and senior faculty members analyses
department calendar and will be incorporated with additional activities to meet the
curriculum gap.
The department calendar of events comprises of academic activities like, Internal Test
dates, internal assessment, internal marks display, proctor meeting, parent teachers
meeting, assignment submission, faculty meeting, conference, orientation program,
alumina meet, and Laboratory examination schedule. Individual faculty members will
prepare the course plan and lesson plan for the semester adhering to the department
calendar of events.
Innovative teaching learning process is implemented by the guide lines and format of
the college while preparing lecture notes, lesson plan and course plan. Depending on
the requirement of the subjects video lecturing, power point Presentations,
collaborative learning methods and Invited talks are arranged.
Adhering to the department calendar of events
Assignments are given to students for their better performance
Invited talks and seminars on the current trends are done regularly from the
industry persons
Tutorial/Remedial classes are conducted for the slow learners based on their
performance in external exams and after the first internals
Motivating and guiding students for higher studies and university ranks
Technical quiz is conducted for the students
MENTOR-MENTEE SYSTEM
Process of mentoring system
Each staff member is allocated a group of 12-15 students once in four years.

Students are being mentored thrice in a semester personally. After every Internals,
they are being monitored for their academic performance and Regularity in attendance
The mentoring details and their performance is maintained with respective mentors
and updated periodically.
Mentoring also includes career guidance like, participating in Events like quiz, paper
presentation, mini projects and technical fests.
Mentoring also includes alerting and guiding by, being in touch with students
regularly, through different modes, like creating whatsapp groups, mails and
messages.
At the end of every internals ,observations (problems faced by students)made by the

mentors are collected ,consolidated by the Mentoring Coordinator,
The Mentoring Coordinator makes the consolidated report and submits the same, to
the PAC committee, for corrective measures.
The PAC committee conducts meeting and takes the appropriate measures
Table 2.8: Policy Mechanism of Mentoring System
1 List of faculty members 30
2 No of students per mentor 1:12
3 Frequency of meeting thrice

The process diagram of the mentoring system is as shown below
ALLOCATION OF
STUDENTS TO STAFF
PERIODIC MEETING
OF MENTOR AND
MENTEE
MEETING OF WEAK
STUDENTS IN THE
PRESENCE OF THEIR
PARENTS
FINAL SUBMISSION OF
COUNSELING REPORT
Figure 2.10 : flow diagram showing process diagram of mentoring system in

department

ACADEMIC/MULTIFACETED
COUNSELING FOR MENTEES
IF FOUND REMEDIAL CLASSES

POOR IN YES
GIVEN IN THAT SUBJECT
SUBJECT FOR IMPROVEMENT
NO
ENCOURAGING STUDENTS TO
DO BEYOND SYLABUS
Figure 2.11: Flow diagram showing process diagram of mentor-mentee guidance
ACADEMIC YEAR 2014-15
The candidates having poor performance in academic and Curriculum
activities are identified by the respective Class co-ordinators and reported to their
respective Proctor, Now the Proctor is authoritative in counseling their Mentees
.In the extreme cases, this counseling is done in the presence of the Mentee
parents. The same report will be passed to the Parent-cell and other faculties
handling the different subjects of the Mentee, as a proof of counseling.

2.2.1.2. Impact analysis
The following are the positive outcomes observed after adopting the above mentioned
innovative TLP
Improved attendance of students for every class
Active participation of students in OBE(Outcome Based Education)activities
New view points and new project ideas are derived in class
Better bondage between students and faculties
Appreciation from the parents
2.2.1.3. Initiatives and implementation details of improving Quality of Laboratory
Experiments
Faculty members of respective specialization will be formed a group with a team
leader to discuss the preparation of manual, Material requirements, conduction of
experiments and cycle of experiments before commencement of semester.
The Computer Science & Engineering Laboratories are conducted in session of 3
hours, in each session the faculty explains the logic and (or) algorithm of the program
to be experimented.
The students will write the complete program in concerned programming language in
the observation book, and then code/debug/execute the program on the system and
interpret the results.
The executed program with output, related theory and Algorithm or flowchart is
documented in the record book by the students later which will be evaluated.
In each subject many students are made to work on number of additional programs for

the better understanding of the subject.
Viva questions will be prepared in advance for all the experiment.
The college organize inter collegiate contests to encourage students to demonstrate
their programming skills
The Laboratories are evaluated by the faculties for 25 marks at two levels as
shown in the table 2.10
Table 2.9: Laboratory evaluation pattern
Level Evaluation Type
1. Continuous Evaluation in every lab session 10 marks
2. Laboratory Internal Test, Attendance and 15 marks
Record submission
Very good results in laboratory examination.
Improvement in analytical abilities of students thus improves the placement
The stimulating environment made students to learn other programming languages
apart from curriculum
2.2.1.5. Initiatives and implementation details of Encouraging Bright Students
The Department of CSE is an Educational Institution Member of Computer Society of
India (CSI) [Member Number: M10206] valid till Feb 2021.
ACM Student Chapter was inaugurated 20 Oct 2016 and one day workshop on
Android Applications was conducted.
The RYMEC always have the culture of encouraging bright students by providing
them necessary guidance and moral support.

The bright students are identified based on their overall performance and their
orientation towards Academics.
Encouraged to present seminar on content beyond syllabus
Encouraged to attend interested conferences, workshops and publish papers
Encouraged to take up innovative projects and apply for funding.
Encouraged to participate in various competitions.
The bright students having high academic track records are encouraged by faculties to
achieve university ranks, also encouraged to take up competitive examinations like
GATE, TOEFL, GRE,RRB,SSE etc.,
The bright students having orientation to research are encouraged by faculties to do
publications in National & International conference & Journals,
Table 2.10: Students attempted the GATE exam
Registration No Name of Student Year
CS16S61103079 KEERTHIKA YM 2016
CS16S61103061 SHARON M 2016
CS106909074 ANUSHA K 2014
CS106909022 DEEPIKA S 2014
CS106908106 NEHA D 2014
CS106908032 BHAGYASHREE S 2014
A625F50(Enrolment Id) AMBIKA S 2014
CS2057052 MANASA HK 2012

MUKKTAYAKKA
CS2055249 2012
RAJASHEKHAR DESAI
CS1103327 MANGALA J 2012
Co- curricular activities
Sl. No Event Participants Year
Paper Published Shainaj .B (8th Sem)

Security P Laxmi Devi (8th
Enhancements for Sem)
1 MANETs with Trust Vani S G (8th Sem) May 2016
management using Shilpa (8th Sem)
uncertain reasoning
in IJAETMAS (ISSN:
2349-3224)
National Conference Shainaj .B (8th Sem)
on Information & P Laxmi Devi (8th
communication Sem)
2 May 2016
technology, Vani S G (8th Sem)
Basavakalayan Shilpa (8th Sem)
Engineering College,
Bidar
International Akshata S (8th Sem)
conference on Gudipati Ashalatha
Advances in (8th Sem)
3 March 2016
Computing Logic, Kavya B (8th Sem)
Technology & Kothapalli Jyothi (8th
Sciences, ALIT, Sem)
Ananthapuramu
Paper Published Akshata S (8th Sem)
Automated Face Gudipati Ashalatha
Detection & (8th Sem)
recognition for Kavya B (8th Sem)
4 detecting Kothapalli Jyothi (8th March 2016
impersonation of Sem)
candidate in
Examination System
in IERS (ISBN: 978-
93-85818-80-6)
TCS TECHBYTES, Around 16 Students
5 Zonal Level, A 2016
Technical Quiz
Competition, Hubli
6 LEAD Prayana, a two Divya M 2016
week Leadership (4th sem)

Journey
EUNDIA, CARE ( Shalem Raj,
7 2015
Conservation and Nikhil P,
Rescue) 11th OCT Khaja Mohiddin
National level Paper Sweethashree R N
8 Presentaion, Soumya R 2015
ANVESHANA,
STJIT, Ranebennur
ICCIT 2015 Basavaraj Muragod
9 Cambridge Institute of 2015
Technology,
Bangalore
(WINNERS)
Bhagya
Indira
10 Soft Skill Contest 2014
Chaitra
Shivaram
Rakesh
Roop Sundar
Lavanya A
11 TCS TECHBYTES Ramya N D 2014
Archana
Chaitanya
Prastuthi, Paper Veena
12 Presentaion, Divya 2013
WONDERS-13
PDIT Hospet
SAMSHOCHANAM, S. Indira
13 2013
National Tech Fest
STJIT, Ranebennur
14 DRESTEIN, Tech Jhansi Rani R 2013
Fest, BITM
Extra-curricular activities
2016-2017
Participated VTU kalburgi zone Hockey men held at BLDE engg college,bijapur from
30.08.2016 to 31.08.2016
Sl.No Names Department/sem

1. Kushal Naidu CSE/7th
2. Indra Reddy YC CSE/7th
3. Sagar CSE/7th
4. Boya Raghu CSE/3rd
5 Basavanna gouda CSE/5th

Kolur
6 Channa Basava CSE/7th
Participated VTU kalburgi zone TABLE TENNIS MEN 29th & 30th September,2016 at
GNDEC, Bidar
Sl.No. Name Dept/sem

1. Kritagya Chand CSE/7th
Participated VTU kalburgi zone TABLE TENNIS WOMEN 29th & 30th September,2016 at
GNDEC, Bidar
Sl.No Name Dept/sem

1. Priyanka C CSE/5th
2 Priya Darshani CSE/5th
Participated VTU kalburgi zone SWIMMING(MEN) held at RYMEC, BALLARI from 27-
09-2016 to 14-09-2016
Sl. no Name Sem /branch

1 G.S.Mayur Ramesh CSE/3RD
2 sheshrajreddy 3RD / CSE
Participated VTU kalburgi zone Throw Ball tournament held at G.N.D.E.C Bidar From
09/10/ 2016 & 10/10/2016 (Inter Zonal at NIE IT Mysore from 13/10/2016 & 14/10/2016)
SL.no Name Sem /branch

1 Chandrakala 3rd/ cse
2 Sai Sridevi 1st/cse
2015-2016
Sl.No Name Sem /branch Sport
VTU TABLE TENNIS, AIT,

1 Kritagya Chand 5rd sem CHIKMAGALUR From
10/09/2015 to 12/09/2015
2 Kritagya Chand 5rd sem VTU TABLE TENNIS, GNDC,

GULBARGA From 07 & 08

SEP 2015
VTU cricket zonal

3 Shivu 4th sem tournament, RYMEC from
04/03/2015 to 08/03/2015
INDRA REDDY YC, HOCKEY, BITM BALLARI,

BASAVANA GOUDA.V, 15th and 16th April 2015
KUSHAL KUMAR NAIDU, 4th sem
4
BHUWAN
2nd sem
LAMICHHANE,
POOJAN K GAGRAN
Shuttle badminton (women)
RYMEC BALLARI
Priyanka 3rd Sem Tournament,
22nd & 23rd Aug 2015
NMAMIT UDUPI
26TH TO 28TH Aug 2015
2014-2015
Runners-Up in Basket Ball Tournament at BLDEA,BIJAPUR, Inter Collegiate Zonal
tournament, 2014
Winner(Venkat N) in Hand Ball Tournament at RYMEC, Bellary Inter Collegiate
Zonal tournament, 2014
Runners-Up in Ball Badminton Tournament at VTU, Inter Collegiate Zonal
tournament, 2014
Winners of Table Tennis tournament at GuruNanakDev Engineering College, Bidar,
2013
2.2.1.7. Initiatives and implementation details of Assisting Weak Students
The department has a well defined process of monitoring, guiding, assisting slow
learners (weak students).

A humble care is taken by the faculties in monitoring the performance of slow
learners once in every month, the students deviations from studies is observed by the
respective section coordinators and corrective measures are suggested.
The faculties also go a step ahead and have periodic interaction with the parents
about the performance of slow learners
A blended motivation and responsibility from both parents and faculties will create a
positive mindset and will help to overcome the inabilities and hurdles faced by the
slow learners.
Every parent is informed about the IA marks and the attendance by a system through
SMS
Additional coaching is given to slow learners through Remedial classes simplified
exam oriented coaching and materials are provided to them.
A special counseling and tutorial classes are conducted by the faculties for those
students who have failed in any subject.
The observable impact of assisting weak students is reduced number of identifiable
weak students
Improved results and less number of failures in each subjects
Appreciation from the parents
The following Fig 2.13 shows the strategy to improve students performance

Students Classification
Bright students Weak Students (Slow Learners)
Academic activities, Co and Remedial Classes, Tutorial Classes,

Extra Curricular activities, Group Studies with Bright students,
Seminar, Competitive exams, Assignments and Tests
Publications, etc
Collaborative Learning
Improved the students performance
Figure 2.12: Flow diagram showing strategy for improved student performance
2.2.2. Quality of internal semester Question papers, Assignments and Evaluation
2.2.2.1. Initiatives and Implementation details for improving the quality of Internal
Semester Question papers (Internal Assessment Test)
IA quality committee is formed for various activities containing senior faculty
The IA quality committee will frame the rules and monitor activities
The committee will follow the various activities
o Divide the enter course to three parts for three tests

o The question paper format will be formatted by committee.
o The question papers format circulated to course owners for IA TEST.
o Before questions are printed they are verified by team for quality
After the test post activities are
o The scheme of evaluation are verified with questions
o The marks and attendance sent to parents
o The weak students are identified and sent to mentor for counseling
o The quality of question papers analyzed and discussed in meeting for further
tests
After final test
o The final IA marks sent to program coordinator for further activities
The faculties of the department conduct three internal assessment tests at 6 th, 12th and
14th week respectively.
The tests are conducted for a maximum of 25 marks. (No minimum marks criteria
from the university).
I. Question Papers:
For each subjects, question bank is prepared at the beginning of each semester
According to level of toughness the questions are prepared (viz., analyzing the
problems, implementation of modern tools, formulating the problems etc), which is
termed as Blooms Taxonomy.
II. Assignments:
Assignment issue and submission dates are announced by the respective faculty
members.

Assignment questions are prepared using Blooms Taxonomy process.
Surprise tests, quizzes, video links are provided.
III. Evaluation:
The faculties after every internal assessment test they explain the solution of the
questions in the class which will enable them to perform well in the final
examination.
For any genuine reasons, if a student was unable to perform well in the given three
internal assessment tests, improvement test is given to him/her.
The average of the marks obtained from any best two test is chosen for the award of
internal assessment marks.
If a candidate remains absent for all the tests conducted, the Internal assessment
marks are marked as Absent in the result.
Assignments are used as a tool for practice and evaluation is based purely on Internal
Assessment Test.
Choice Based Credit System ( CBCS )
The university has introduced CBCS system from 2015 admitted batch.
The new pattern for internal assessment was introduced where in the internal assessment
is done for a total of 20 Marks.
15 marks assessment is done by test and 5 marks by assignment, seminar, etc.
Table 2.11: Internal Assessment pattern for CBCS
Internal Assessment
Test 15 Marks
Assignments, seminar, etc 5 Marks
Total marks 20 Marks

Department Internal Assessment Process

HOD will frame the IA Coordinator and committee. And ask them to conduct the
internals.
The IA coordinator calls the meeting and discuss about the process of IA quality
assessment. And direct the committee members to follow the quality assurance
activity as given below
1. The IA quality committee will give guidelines for IA Question paper
preparation.
2. After the test, the committee will verify the quality of questions with
guidelines given before the test.
3. IA committee will make the observations, the observations along with
suggestions passed over to IA coordinator.
4. After finalization of IA marks, IA marks and attendance sent to parents and
mentors for the process of intimation and counseling respectively.
5. After all the tests the summary of test are submitted to other committee in the
department.

Process of Internal Assessment in the Department
Internal
Assessment
QP Preparation IA Quality
Committee
IA Scheme &
IA Quality
Solution
Resolution
IA evaluation
IA Analysis &
Feedback
IA Marks
submission Summary of
Quality analysis
report
IA Report to Mentor
& Parents
Counselling Report
to Course SMS to Parents
Committee
Course
Committee
Fig 2.13: Flow diagram of Internal Assessment

Very good results in Internal and External examination.
Improvement in overall performance of students thus improves the placement
The stimulating environment made students to plan their study plan for better
performance.
2.2.2.3. Initiatives and implementation details of improving Quality of Laboratory
Experiments (Assignments)
The college organize inter collegiate contests to encourage students to demonstrate
their programming skills
The Computer Science & Engineering Laboratories are conducted in session of 3
hours, in each session the faculty explains the logic and (or) algorithm of the program
to be experimented.
The students will write the complete program in concerned programming language in
the observation book, and then code/debug/execute the program on the system and
interpret the results.
The executed program with output, related theory and Algorithm or flowchart is
documented in the record book by the students later.
In each subject many students are made to work on number of additional programs for
the better understanding of the subject.
Online Quizzes were conduction at the ending of laboratory sessions to improve the
programming skills of the students.
The Laboratories are evaluated by the faculties for 25 marks at two levels.

Table 2.12: Laboratory evaluation pattern
Level Evaluation Type
1. Continuous Evaluation in every lab session 10 marks
2. Laboratory Internal Test, Attendance and 15 marks
Record submission
Very good results in laboratory examination.
Improvement in analytical abilities of students thus improves the placement
The stimulating environment made students to learn other programming languages
apart from curriculum
2.2.3. Quality of Student projects
2.2.3.1. Initiatives
The students projects are selected in line with department mission, vision and
Program outcomes.
Students are provided with brief idea of various domains for selecting the project
ideas. Hence the project work is carried out in domains like Mobile Ad-Hoc networks,
Sensor networks, Image processing, Web based project, Database project, Embedded
system projects, Robotics, etc.
Project allocation methodology
Students will be asked to submit their project batches in Google forms.

Project batch numbering will be done in first come first served basis.
Seven project domains are discussed and are decided in the meeting. The same
will be circulated to both students and project guides.
Project batches will be allocated to staff according to their seniority.

Project coordinator will circulate previous project titles to all project guides
and students so that same projects should not repeat.
Students will meet their respective guides and will discuss about project areas,
interests and will finalize the project title.
Students with the approval of their respective project guides and project
assessment committee will submit project titles to project coordinator.
Project batch submission
Project Batch Numbering on FCFS Basis
Project Areas Circulation
Project batch allocation to

staff based on seniority
Circulation of previous
project titles
Students meet Project guides
Finalize Project Title in the Project Areas Circulated
NO
Approval from Project Assessment
committee and Project coordinator
YES
Submission of Project Title with the approval of project guide

and coordinator and project assessment committee
Fig 2.14: Flow diagram showing the process of student project batch allocation
A well planned Project work Calendar of events is prepared by project co-ordinator
which is communicated to all the students and project guides.

The faculties encourage students to participate in project exhibitions.
The faculties encourage students to publish their project work in reputed
journals/conferences.
The faculties encourage students to avail the external funding schemes for their
project work. (Like KSCST, DIC, VTU project funding scheme).
Process to identify the best projects is formulated for year 2014-2015.(Annexure
2.2.3.1.e)
The best projects for the year 2012-13, 2013-14,2014-15,2015-16 are identified. (
Annexure 2.2.3.1.a,b,c,d).
The process of evaluation of best projects is revised for academic year 2015-16 in
consultation of HOD and senior staff. The evaluation grading is mentioned in table
2.14.
Table 2.13: Evaluation grading for year 2015-16
TOPICS TO BE COVERED IN PROJECT PLAN POINTS
Average Internal Marks (AIM) (IM1+IM2+IM3+IM4)/4
Communication Government Financed Projects 15
with Government Projects 12
Outside World Journal with Impact Factor > 2.5 10

(COW)
Project Exhibition and paper presentation 8
TOTAL POINTS AIM+COW
The Course Outcome (CO), Program Outcome(PO), CO-PO mapping, BTL mapping
and Course exit survey of project is maintained by the respective project guide and a
copy of it is retained by the project coordinator

Project execution flow diagram for academic year 16-17 is as shown in the
following flow chart
BATCH FORMATION
SELECTION OF STUDENTS
GUIDE ALLOTMENT FOR INTERNSHIP
TITLE SUBMISSION
SYNOPSIS
PHASE-1 PRESENTATION
[INTRODUCTION]
PROJECT EXHIBITIONS,
CONFERENCES
(INTERACTING WITH OUTSIDE WORLD)
[LS, ANALYSIS, DESIGN
PARTIAL EXECUTION]
PROJECT EXHIBITION
[FINAL DEMO WITH
IMPLEMENTATION AND DRAFT
REPORT SUBMISSION]
BEST PROJECT
SELECTION
FINAL REPORT
FINAL EXTERNAL PROJECT LABORATORY EXAM

Figure 2.15 : PROJECT EXECUTION FLOW DIAGRAM
The process of identification of best projects is revised for the academic year 2016-17
in consultation of HOD and senior staff. The process is mentioned in table 2.15:
PROCESS TO DEFINE BEST PROJECTS
Three projects with highest marks will be selected as best projects
Table 2.14: Process to define best projects
TOPICS TO BE COVERED IN PROJECT PLAN POINTS
( (i)/N)/2
Average Internal Marks (AIM)[50 M]
[N- Number of Students]
In-House Project External Evaluator 25

Exhibition
Average of Internal Evaluators 25
(IPE) [50 M]
Communication Government Financed Projects/

20
Government Projects
with
Outside World Journal with Impact Factor > 2.5 16
(COW) [50 M] Project Exhibition 14
TOTAL POINTS [150 M] AIM+IPE+COW
Technical talks are conducted to encourage students to choose good projects. The
details of such talk are given below
Sl No Interaction Resource Person Relevance to

Title Year
Type with Designation POs, PSOs
The role of E- Shri. Shivaprakash 15/03/2016 PO 3, PO 8, PO
1 A Technical
Governance Vastrad, DIO, 9, PO 10, PO 11,
Talk
projects in Digital National Informatics PO 12

India Centre (NIC), Ballari
2.2.3.1.1. Implementation
A project coordinator is appointed by the Head of the department who is
responsible for planning, scheduling and execution of all the activities related to
the student project work
Timeline Task Particulars
Semester Seven
Students are invited to
prepare their batch and
get it registered with the
project coordinator of the
department. They will
receive project batch
Call for project batch and identification number
2nd week
guide allotment which is used as reference
throughout the academic
year.
With respect to the areas
of interest of each guide
the batches will receive a
guide to them.
Students are instructed to
submit the title of the
project in consultation
5th week Call for Project Titles
with their respective guide
in a given proforma to the
project coordinator.
The student submitting
project titles are pre-
12th week Synopsis submission
evaluated by a team of
faculty.
The submitted project
titles are reviewed by a
Project title finalization and committee consisting of
14th week
Abstract submission Project coordinator, Head
of the department and
some senior faculties.

Semester Eight
submit Software
requirement specification
4th week First Review and give a PowerPoint
presentation for the
project. (Evaluation phase
I by a team of faculty)
submit Design document
of the project and give a
8th week Second Review PowerPoint presentation
for the project.
(Evaluation phase II by a
team of faculty)
submit complete project
report will university
compliances and give a
12th week Final Demonstration
PowerPoint presentation
for the project.
(Evaluation phase III by a
team of faculty)
The marks for the project
Project internal marks work is announced and
14th week
announcement processed according to the
university regulations.

RUBRICS FOR PROJECT EVALUATION(15-16)
Meets
Exceptionally Good with room Course
Component minimum BTL
Marks[M] Criteria Well Executed for improvement Outcome
requirement Mapping
[M>90%] [70%<M<90%] Mapping
[M<70%]
Synopsis
submitted with Synopsis with
Synopsis with a
well and clearly poor problem
problem identified
Synopsis identified and literature
and a literature
problem and very survey of few
survey.
good literature papers.
survey.
Specification is Specification is
Specification
complete and mostly complete
does not
appropriately but not
SRS adequately
detailed with all appropriately
represent the
sections and a detailed with all
Documentati problem. CO1,
30 good plan. sections and a plan. L4, L3
on CO3
Object oriented Object oriented
Object oriented
concepts are very concepts are
concepts are used
Design well followed and poorly executed
and level of detail
written in and not written
is too vague.
appropriate detail. appropriately.
Clear and well Little in the way
Good test cases,
thought out test of test cases.
but some boundary
cases presented One or more
conditions are
Test Cases that cover all obvious
missing. Range of
boundary boundary
user input mostly
condition and conditions
ell thought.
comprehensive missing.

range of user
inputs.
The thesis is not

The thesis is clearly stated
The thesis is
clearly stated with with inadequate
clearly stated with
Thesis adequate content. content. Flow
good flow and
Flow was little was little
adequate content.
difficult to follow. difficult to
follow.
Problem is broken
Problem is broken
into well thought Code elements
into elements.
out elements with exist, no
Functionality Length, reusability
good length, reusability and
and efficiency need
reusability and efficiency.
to be taken care.
efficiency.
Source Code 10 CO2 L2
Most recent and New technologies Old
Use of Modern efficient but not efficient technologies
Technologies technologies are technologies are and platform are
used. used. used.
Screen based
Screen based Screen based
instructions and
instructions are instructions are
final output is
mostly clear and not clear and
User Interface clear, attractive
attractive. User attractive. Not
Execution 15 and very user CO2 L2
friendly with very user
friendly with
correct messages. friendly
correct messages.
Program handles All obvious error Some error
Validation
erroneous or conditions are conditions are

unexpected input. checked. May not checked does

Meets all meet all the not meet all
requirements. requirements. specified
requirements.
Testing is All key items are Testing was
complete without tested, but testing done, but is not
being redundant. may be redundant. sufficiently
Testing All boundary Nearly all complete. Most
cases are boundary cases are boundary cases
considered and considered and are considered
tested. tested. and tested.
Team members
were very well
Team members are Team members
balanced and had
audible and fluent. were inaudible
Demonstration clear articulation
Presentation was but fluent. Poor
and power point
good. presentation.
presentation was
Presentation 30 excellent. CO3 L3
Paper was
presented in a Paper was
Paper was
Paper very good presented in
presented in a
Presentation conference or conference with
conference.
journal with good no relevant data.
impact factor.
No adjustments of
Rarely gets
deadlines.
Usually uses time things done by
Time Ensured timely
Individual well. Had to adjust deadlines.
Management productions.
Performanc 15 deadlines. Rarely meet the CO4 L3
Routinely met the
e guide.
guide.
Team worked Team worked well Team did not
Team Work
with unity and with unity most of work well with

mutual respect. the times. Each unity and

Each member member mutual respect.
contributed well. contributed to the Contribution
project. from few of the
members was
lacking.
Major and minor Concepts were
Major concepts
concepts were known but not
Subject were known with
very well known clearly.
Knowledge limited research
with good Research effort
effort.
research effort. was missing.

RUBRICS FOR PROJECT EVALUATION (16-17)
Exceptionally Well Good with room for Meets minimum Course PO BTL
Mark
Component Criteria Executed improvement requirement Outcome Mappin Mappin
s
[M>90%] [70%<M<90%] [M<70%] Mapping g g
Identify problem Identify a problem in
Identify a problem in
integrating and balancing which more than two
Problem Identification
5 Sustainability economic, environmental

which one factor out of
factors out of three are
three is missing.
and social factors. missing.
With strong ground work Fails to apply computing
Basic principles are
on computing theories, principles within specific
understood, but fails to
Methodology relevant information and problem domain and
5
(15)
analyze them properly to

Followed constraints are obtained
Identify an existing
which is leading to
and are analyzed well to Identify a very poor
problem to be extended.
identify unique problem. existing problem.
Budget
Estimation Project cost is 10%-15% Project cost is 25% more
Project has been
more than the estimated of the estimated cost
5 & completed within the
cost and little time and never followed the
Project estimated cost and time.
variation. plan.
planning
Excellent literature survey
Good literature survey
Literature done referring good
5 done referring few Poor literature survey.
Survey number of reputed journal
conference papers..
Communication (50)
papers..
Document is almost
Document is complete and
complete but not Document does not
Documentatio appropriately detailed with
15 appropriately detailed adequately represent
n all sections and a good
with all sections and a the problem.
plan.
plan.
The thesis is not clearly
Thesis with The thesis is clearly stated The thesis with adequate
stated with adequate
with good flow and content and plagiarism
10 Plagiarism adequate content and 25%-40%. Flow was little
content and plagiarism
check >40%. Flow was little
plagiarism< 25%. difficult to follow.
difficult to follow.
Team members were very Team members were Team members were
well balanced with good balanced with major not in coordination. Poor
10 Demonstration subject knowledge. concepts known. knowledge. Inaudible
Excellent power point Presentation was audible presentation.

presentation. and fluent.

Project Paper presented in journal Paper was presented in a Paper was presented in
with good impact factor / conference/ selected in conference with no
10 Presentation selected as best project in project exhibition. relevant data/ Applied
Outside project exhibitions for project exhibition.
Problem is broken into Problem is broken into
Code elements exist, no
well thought out elements elements. Length,
5 Functionality with good length, reusability and efficiency
reusability and
efficiency.
Execution (15)
reusability and efficiency. need to be taken care.

Source Code
Use of Modern Most recent and efficient New technologies but not
Old technologies and
5 Technologies technologies are used. efficient technologies are
platform are used.
&
/Tools used.
All boundary cases are All boundary cases are Most boundary cases are
considered and tested. considered and tested. All considered and tested.
Program handles obvious error conditions Some error conditions
5 Testing erroneous or unexpected are checked and may not are checked but did not
input and meets all meet all the meet all specified
requirements requirements. requirements.
No adjustments of
Timely production were Rarely gets things done
deadlines. Ensured timely
5 Deadlines productions. Routinely met
missing. Adjusted by deadlines. Rarely
deadlines. meet the guide.
the guide.
Management
Time & Team
Presentation Excellent presentation and Excellent presentation Good presentation and

5
time time utilisation. and good time utilisation poor time utilisation.
(20)
Meeting
Frequency Met the guide exactly the Met the guide most of Failed to meet the guide
5 [No of times team number of times planned. the times. most of the times.
met guide*3/No of
Planned meetings]
Excellent reviews from the Average reviews from the Poor revies from peers
5 Peer Review team mates, as they have team mates, with less because of lack of
very good coordination. team coordination. coordination.

2.2.3.1.2. Impact analysis
New innovative ideas are born for project work
Skills or abilities of students improved.
Knowledge on various aspects of project management were developed
Confidence level of the students was boosted
Improved teamwork spirit
Implementation and deployment of the project for social benefits.
Document preparation and presentation.
More tendencies to showcase their project work in project exhibition were observed.
27 student batches have applied for Student Project Programme (SPP) 40th Series
2016-2017, KSCST.
Many projects have been sponsored by government agencies like KSCST. Details
are given in table 2.16(For Year 2015-16)
Table 2.15: KSCST sponsored projects
PROJECT TITLE STUDENT NAME USN GUIDE AMOUNT

SPONSERED
PRIYANKA.V 3VC12CS064
INDUSTRY AND
COMMERCE ASSENT SHALINI.C 3VC12CS076 Prof. T. K. PUNEETH RS. 3000.00
COMMUNE (ICAC) AKSHITHA.K 3VC12CS006
AYESHA SHAIK 3VC12CS013
AFSHEEN
SAHANA.S 3VC12CS072
EFINANCIAL
ASSITANCE FOR SHANTHI.K 3VC12CS078 DR. H.GIRISHA RS. 3000.00
ENTERPRENEURS SUSHMA.M 3VC12CS090
RAMYA.A 3VC12CS068
SYED YAKUB 3VC12CS093
ETAX EXCEMPTION
HUSSAIN
ASHFAQ UR 3VC12CS108 Prof. K. SURESH RS. 3000.00
REHMAN
VINOD.H 3VC12CS104
SHIVARAM.A 3VC12CS082
RAMYASHREE.G.R 3VC12CS069

CELL PHONE OPERATED SHWETHA.T.S 3VC12CS092

Prof. SARVAR BEGUM RS. 3000.00
MOBILE BUG USING VASANTHI.K 3VC12CS101
MICROCONTROLLER
ANDROID AND SOUMYASHREE 3VC12CS085
BLUETOOTH BASED VOICE Prof. KAVITHA.J RS. 4000.00
CONTROLLED WIRELESS RIZWANA 3VC12CS070
SMART HOME SYSTEM K.SANJANA 3VC12CS074
CHOUDARY
Department of Industries and Commerce, Government of Karnataka have selected
students and assisted in developing government project as a part of the curriculum. The
details are in table 2.17 (year 2015-16):
Table 2.16: DIC sponsored projects
PROJECT TITLE STUDENT NAME USN GUIDE
PRIYANKA.V 3VC12CS064
SHALINI.C 3VC12CS076
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE
Prof. Punith
ASSENT COMMUNE (ICAC) AKSHITHA.K 3VC12CS006
AYESHA SHAIK
3VC12CS013
AFSHEEN
SAHANA.S 3VC12CS072
SHANTHI.K 3VC12CS078
E-FINANCIAL ASSITANCE FOR
Dr. H Girisha
ENTERPRENEURS
SUSHMA.M 3VC12CS090
RAMYA.A 3VC12CS068
SYED YAKUB
3VC12CS093
HUSSAIN
ASHFAQ UR REHMAN 3VC12CS108

E-DTAX EXCEMPTION Prof. Suresh K
VINOD.H 3VC12CS104
SHIVARAM.A 3VC12CS082

The following students have participated in Akhila Bharathi Vidya Parishad (ABVP)
organized State-level Project exhibition and competion Srishti-2016 at CMR Institute
of Technology, Bangalore dated 6-8 May 2016
Table 2.17: student participation in ABVP state-level project exhibition and
competition
SL. PROJECT GUIDE

STUDENT NAME USN
NO. TITLE
Rachel Evangeline Alive human being
3VC12CS066
Christian detection in war field Prof. Shridevi M
1 Sindhu Rani A.H 3VC12CS084 using PIR sensor and (CONSOLATION PRIZE)
Tulasi M 3VC12CS097 wireless technology
Indira S K 3VC12CS030
Bhagya H S 3Vc12CS016 Automated Student Prof. D.V.Swetha
2
N Tarun kumar reddy 3VC12CS049 Project Management Ramana
Krishna 3VC12CS041
Sharon.M 3VC12CS079 Touch screen based Prof. Nagaveni Biradar
Vaishnavi.K 3VC12CS100 nurse/attendant calling
3
Shainaz Sultana 3VC13CS407 system for physically (CONSOLATION PRIZE)
Saraswati.C.Havalkod 3VC13CS410 impared
Megha.m 3VC12CS047
Challa nandini 3VC12CS019 Railway Route
4 Prof. R.P.Rajeshwari
Poornima 3VC12CS059 Optimization
Anusha.p 3VC12CS010
Jyothi. P 3VC12CS032
Preethi Kannur 3VC12CS062 Automation of
5 Prof. Sunitha
PRIYANKA N S 3VC12CS063 Examination Cell
Rajeswari Ansuri 3VC12CS067
Seminar
A seminar is a formal presentation by a student in a given subject matter. Seminar is offered as a
course in the VTU curriculum for engineering students in semester VIII.
The VTU regulation defining about seminar is as below.
OB 9.1 Seminar topic shall be selected from the emerging technical areas only.

Hence a formal process is designed for conduction of this course for the students at departmental
level.
The details of process for seminar conduction are described below.
Intimation to students about seminar topic selection and submission.
Allotment of guides.
Giving Instructions to submit abstract with co-po mapping.
Approval of seminar titles with co-po mapping matrix from concerned guide.
Submission of approved titles to seminar co-ordinator.
Giving Instructions to students about seminar presentation ( Attendance, dos & donts, dress code etc)
Display of seminar schedule.
Conduction of seminar in presence of HOD, Guide and coordinator
Certification of seminar reports.
Finalization of seminar marks

Seminar conduction process
Students are intimated to select the seminar topics

from the areas specified by the department
Guides are Allotment for seminar batches.
Students are given how to prepare seminar abstract

with co-po mapping.
Approval of seminar titles with co-po mapping matrix

from concerned guide.
Seminar titles are submitted to seminar co-ordinator
Students are given Instructions about seminar

presentation ( Attendance, dos &donts, dress code etc)
Display of seminar schedule
Conduction of seminar in presence of HOD, Guide

and coordinator
Certification of seminar reports
Finalization of seminar marks
Figure 2.16: Flow Diagram of seminar conduction process

Timeline followed for seminar course
Time line Task Particulars
In VII Sem
Students are advised to choose
the seminar topics among the
Intimation to select seminar Titles areas specified by the
2 Week
department
Students are required to select
the seminar titles and are
Selection of seminar titles and Submission of
required to write co-po
5 Week CO-PO mapping to seminar guide
mapping matrix
Students the instructed to get
the co-po mapping approved
Approval of CO-PO mapping from guide
12 Week by the concerned guide
The seminar title with co-po
mapping approved by guide
Submission of seminar titles to seminar
has to be submitted to the
coordinator
14 Week coordinator
In VIII Sem
In semester 8 schedule for the
seminar are displayed with date
time and place along with
instructions to students and
Display of seminar schedule and conduction of
8 Week seminars are conducted as per
seminars
schedule
The students are required to
9 Week Final report submission submit the seminar reports
In this phase the finalization of
10 Week Finalization of seminar marks seminar marks are carried out

RUBRICS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF INDIVIDUAL SEMINAR

Academic Year 2016-17
COURSE CODE __________ COURSE TITLE: ________________ DATE:
_________
NAME OF STUDENT:_______________________ USN______________ SEM : ____
VIII ____
TITLE OF ORAL PRESENTATION: ____________________________________ MAX. MARKS
50
Note: Please tick () in the appropriate cells.
Criterion (10 (9 Marks) (8 Marks) (7 Marks) (<7 Marks) CO PO BTL
mappin mappin mappin
Marks)
Very Good Average Below Average g g g
Excellent Good
Contents Very Good but Good Several Contents

of related to a few slighly Weaknesse deviating from
presentatio title being weaknesse deviating s topic to be
presented s from topic presented
n&
Applicatio
ns
Topic Very Good but Good but Several Very poor

good, a few a few Weaknesse visuals, visuals
Presentatio relevant weaknesse weaknesse s did not
n and visuals, s s with one contribute to the
good font pronounce presentation
Use of size/image d
Visuals` size, weakness
Appropriat
e number
of words
and
images per
slide, good
colour
schemes
Timing and Right Right Long or Tool long Had to be

Pace of length and Length short and or too stopped or less
but too too slow short than 50% of the

Talk well paced slow or or too Almost allocated time

too rushed rushed inaudible Inaudible or
With Very clear Almost or very completely
Audibility and very Clear, inaudible difficult to incomprehensib
precise quite and understand le
precise difficult to
understan
d
Seminar Stictly Followed Slight Followed but Not followed VTU

followed with very deviation with some Guidelines
Report few minor from mistakes completly
VTU mistakes
Guidelines VTU
Guidelines

RUBRICS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF INDIVIDUAL SEMINAR

(Academic Year 2015-16____________)
Course Code ________ Course Title: ________________ Date:
_________
NAME OF STUDENT:_______________________ USN______________ Sem :
__VIII____
TITLE OF ORAL PRESENTATION: _______________________________________ Max. Marks
___50____
Note: Please tick () in the appropriate cells.
Criterion (10 (9 Marks) (8 Marks) (7 Marks) (<7 Marks) CO PO BTL
mappin mappin mappin
Marks)
Very Good Average Below Average g g g
Excellent Good
Contents Very Good but Good Several Contents

of related to a few slighly Weaknesse deviating from
presentatio title being weaknesse deviating s topic to be
presented s from topic presented
n
Topic Very Good but Good but Several Very poor

good, a few a few Weaknesse visuals, visuals
Presentatio relevant weaknesse weaknesse s did not
n and visuals, s s with one contribute to the
good font pronounce presentation
Use of size/image d
Visuals` size, weakness
Appropriat
e number
of words
and
images per
slide, good
colour
schemes
Timing and Right Right Long or Tool long Had to be

Pace of length and Length short and or too stopped or less
Talk well paced but too too slow short than 50% of the
slow or or too Almost allocated time
Very clear rushed inaudible Inaudible or
With

Audibility and very too rushed Almost or very completely

precise inaudible difficult to incomprehensib
Clear, and understand le
quite difficult to
precise understan
d
Applicatio Good Good Slight Several Irrelevant

n of title Number of examples deviation weakness applications
relevant with in the in the
weakness applicatio application
examples n
shown
Seminar Stictly Followed Slight Followed but Not followed VTU

followed with very deviation with some Guidelines
Report few minor from mistakes completly
VTU mistakes
Guidelines VTU
Guidelines
2.2.4. Initiatives related to industry interaction
2.2.4.1. Initiatives for industry interaction
The faculties of the department constantly try to interact with industries like TCS, Tech
Mahindra, RIIT, Mysore and others for invited talks, conduction of workshops, student
internship programs.
2.2.4.2. Implementation
Many invited talks and seminars from industry resource persons are arranged and
department invites the participant from various department and also participants from
other colleges.

The department of Computer Science & Engineering has signed Memorandum of
Understanding (MoU) in order to provide the platform for interaction between the student and
industry.
The details of MoUs are given below
Sl. No Industry Date
1 Vision Software Solutions, Ballari Signed on 28th OCT 2016
2 Aliza Consultancy, Ballari 20th OCT 2016
3 Joint Director, District Industries Center, Ballari Signed on 27th Nov 2015
Following are the industry interaction activities
Sl Resource Person with Relevance to

Interaction Type Year
No Designation POs, PSOs
Two day workshop on Mr. Raghuram, CEO Origin 30/01/2017 PO 2, PO 3, PO
Intellectual Property IP, Bangalore to 4, PO 5, PO
Rights Dr. S Rama Murthy, Senior 31/01/2017 6,PO 7, PO 8,PO
Advisor, OIPA 9, PO 10,PO 11,
Dr. Hanumanthachar PO 12
Joshi,Professor,
Neuroscience Lab, Sharada
Vilas college of Pharmacy,
Mysore
Dr. P Sandhya, Assoc Prof,
VTU Mysore
In collaboration with VTU
e-Learning Center.
1 One day Seminar on Sri. D Sai Natarajan, 24/10/2016 PO 1, PO 2, PO
Current Trends in IT Solution Architect 3, PO 4, PO 5,
Duratech Solutions PO 10, PO 11
Coimbatore
PSO 1, PSO 2
2 One day Design Srinivas M Jamkhandi, 18/10/2016 PO 10, PO 11,
Awareness program on Director, MSME Centre of PO 12
Design Clinic Scheme Excellence, Govt of India

and Innovation IISc Bangalore PSO 1, PSO 2
Shri. Anandmurthy H V,
Deputy Director, MSME
Centre of Excellence, Govt
of India
IISc Bangalore
3 One day Seminar Sri. D Sai Natarajan, 02/04/2016 PO 1, PO 2, PO
Solution Architect 3, PO 4, PO 5,
Web Technologies and Duratech Solutions PO 10, PO 11
Cloud Computing Coimbatore
PSO 1, PSO 2
4 A Technical Talk, Mr. Janardhan Reddy, 05/03/2016 PO 3, PO 6, PO
Entrepreneur, Ballari 7, PO 9, PO 11,
Introduction of the PO 12
goods for establishing
small-scale industries.
5 A Technical Talk, Shri. Somashekar Banakar, 04/03/2016 PO 3, PO 6, PO
Additional Joint Director, 7, PO 9, PO 11,
Entrepreneur skills for District Industry Centre PO 12
budding engineers (DIC), Ballari
6 A Technical Talk Mr. H Nagana Goud, 30/9/2015 PO 1,PO 6, PO 7
Director National Solar
Training Centre, Bangalore
7 FDP on Recent Trends Mr. Antony Dzouza, 13-07- PO 1, PO 2, PO
and Soft skills RIIIT, Mysore 2015 to 9, PO 10, PO 11,
Dr Bala subramani , NBA 25-07- PO 12
nodal Officer, NMAMIT 2015.
NITTE
Dr Anami, Principal, KLE
Engg College, Hubli
Dr Guruprasad ,HOD of
BMS College ,Bangalore
8 One day Invited talk on Dr. Chandrasekhar Gowda, 27/4/2015 PO 1, PO 6, PO
Recent Advances in Former VC, Kuvempu 7
Agent Technology University , Shimoga
9 FDP on Cloud Dr Guruprasad, Prof & 13/7/2015 PO 1, PO 6, PO
Computing / Big Data Head of ISE Dept, BMS TO 7, PO 10
College,Bangalore 23/7/2015
Dr.Imran Khan, Prof
Mysore
University,Mysore
Sathyanarayana Rao,
Retd English Prof

2.2.5. Initiatives related to industry internship/ summer training
(Mention the initiatives, implementation details and impact analysis etc.)
The students are encouraged to take internship program during their semester break.
Faculty members give their guidelines, suggestions and scope and contact details of
an internship. They also help the students by interacting with the industrial experts,
provide the students recommendation letters and other necessary supports.
Sl. Interaction Type Industry Student Name Date/ Duration Relevance

No to POs,
PSOs
Project work District Ms. Sushma M 01/2/2016 to PO 1, PO 2,
e-SWSI(Single Industries Ms. Ramya K 05/05/2016 PO 3, PO 4,
Window Solutions Centre, Ms. Sahana S (4 months) PO 5, PO 9,
1
for Industries) Ballari Ms. Shanti K PO 10,PO 11
PSO 2
Project work District Ms. Akshitha K 02/2/2016 to PO 1, PO 2,
Industry Commerce Industries Ms. Ayesha 03/05/2016 PO 3, PO 4,
Assent Commune Centre, Shaik Afsheen (4 months) PO 5, PO 9,
2
Ballari Ms. Shalini C PO 10,PO 11
Ms. Priyanka V
PSO 2
Project Work E- District Mr. Syed yakub 02/2/2016 to PO 1, PO 2,
dtax Exemption Industries hussain 03/05/2016 PO 3, PO 4,
Centre, Mr. Ashfaq Ur (4 months) PO 5, PO 9,
3
Ballari Rehman PO 10,PO 11
Mr. Vinod H
Mr. Shivaram A PSO 2
The alumni coordinator constantly interacts with alumni those who are working in the
industries and request them to provide necessary guidelines and supports for their
juniors internship.

C
Sl No Resource Person with Relevance to

Interaction Type Year
Designation POs, PSOs
Workshop on Android Mr. Intisar Menhdi 20th & 21st PO 1, PO3, PO4,
1
Applications under Oct 2016 PO5, PO12
ACM student chapter
National Informatics Centre, September PO 1, PO 3,PO
2
Video conference Bellary 2013 5, PO 9, PO 10,
PO 12

CRITERION 3

COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM

CRITERION III 150
OUTCOMES
3.1. Establish the correlation between the courses and the Program Outcomes (POs) and
Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs)
3.1.1. Course Outcomes (COs)
Course Name: LOGIC DESIGN (10CS33) Year of Study: 2014-2015

Course outcomes:
C203.1 Able to acquire the basic knowledge of logic gates and basics of logic design
Able to use the K-map and Quine Mc Clusky method to reduce the hardware required
C203.2
for designing the circuits
C203.3 Able to design and analyze the sequential and combinational logic circuits
C203.4 Able to design and analyze the synchronous and asynchronous logic circuits.
C203.5 Able to design any hard ware and software
Course Name: COMPUTER ORGANIZATION (10CS46) Year of Study: 2014-15

Course Outcomes:
To explain the basics of computer hardware, Instruction Set Architecture: Machine

C214.1 instructions, Instruction format, types addressing modes and write programs in
assembly language.
To discuss the Basics and types of I/O Organization, Interface Circuits, Standard I/O
C214.2
Interfaces.
To describe the memory organization: SRAM, DRAM, concepts on cache memory,

C214.3
Memory Interleaving, Associative memory, Virtual memory organization.
To explain Designing of Fast Adders, Signed and unsigned arithmetic and floating point
C214.4
operations
To describe the fundamental concepts of basic components and design of the CPU: the
C214.5
ALU and control unit
C214.6 To explain the concepts of Single processor, Multicores, Multiprocessors and clusters.

Course Name: COMPUTER NETWORK-1 (10CS56) Year of study: 2014-15

Course Outcomes:
Able to define data communication, explain different reference models and
C305.1
Categorize coding techniques in analog and digital signals.
Able to describe different switching techniques and identify errors in

C305.2
Transmitted signal and solve error detection and correction techniques.
C305.3 Able to explain concepts of protocol and identify different addressing formats.
Able to compare different connecting devices and identify different IEEE

C305.4
Ethernet standards.
Course Name: COMPUTER GRAPHICS & VIRTUALIZATION (10CS65)

Course outcomes: Year of Study: 2014-15
C313.1 Identify software and hardware components of graphics system
C313.2 Understand the basics of OpenGL and able to write openGL programs
Able to implement graphics programs with input interaction using mouse and
C313.3
keyboard
Able to understand the concept of geometrical transformations, coordinate system
C313.4
and frames used in graphic system
C313.5 Understand rendering, lighting and shading techniques
C313.6 Design and implement graphics application using OpenGL
Course Name: OOMD (10CS71) Year of Study: 2014-2015

Course Outcomes:
C401.1 Able to analyze the system requirements and model the domain problem.
Able to evaluate the quality of an analysis, and be able to explain how to
C401.2
Improve it.
C401.3 Able to design and build object-oriented systems.
C401.4 Able to evaluate the quality of a design, and be able to explain how to improve it.
Able to read and write analysis and design documentation in the Unified
C401.5
Modeling Language (UML).
Course Name: SSM (10CS82) Year of Study: 2014-2015

Course Outcomes:

Able to describe the role of important elements of simulation and modeling

C410.1
paradigm.
Able to understand the system concept and apply functional modeling method to
C410.2
model the activities of a static system
Able to understand the behavior of a dynamic system and create an analogous model
C410.3
for a dynamic system
Able to simulate the operation of a dynamic system and make improvement
C410.4
according to the simulation results
C410.5 Able to analyze and design discrete-event simulation systems
Able to model the inputs and analyze the output for discrete-event simulation
C410.6
Systems
C410.7 Learn various Verification and validation models for simulated systems.
Course Name: LOGIC DESIGN (10CS33) Year of Study: 2015-2016

Course outcomes:
Able to define the basic operations of logic gates and list out the laws of Boolean
C203.1
algebra.
Able to explain the basics of Boolean Algebra and operations of Logic Components ,
C203.2
combinational and sequential logic Circuits.
C203.3 Able to design and analyze digital circuits and systems.
Course Name: COMPUTER ORGANIZATION (10CS46) Year of Study: 2015-16

Course Outcomes:
Able to describe general software and hardware architecture for computer graphics and
C313.1
use current 3D graphics API(OpenGL).
Able to use the underlying algorithm, mathematical concepts and design and
C313.2
implement model and viewing transformation.
C313.3 Able to select the models for lighting and shading and interactive programming.
C313.4 Able to design and implement model and viewing transformation and projections.
Course Name: COMPUTER NETWORK-1 (10CS56) Year of study: 2015-16

Course Outcomes:

Able to define data communication, explain different reference models and categorize
C305.1
coding techniques in analog and digital signals.
Able to describe different switching techniques and identify errors in transmitted signal
C305.2
and solve error detection and correction techniques.
C305.3 Able to explain concepts of protocol and identify different addressing formats.
Able to compare different connecting devices and identify different IEEE Ethernet
C305.4 standards.
Course Name: COMPUTER GRAPHICS & VIRTUALIZATION (10CS65) Year of Study: 2015-16
Course Outcomes:
Able to describe general software and hardware architecture for computer graphics and
C313.1 use current 3D graphics API(OpenGL).
Able to use the underlying algorithm, mathematical concepts and design and
C313.2
implement model and viewing transformation.
C313.3 Able to select the models for lighting and shading and interactive programming.
C313.4 Able to design and implement model and viewing transformation and projections.
Course Name: OOMD (10CS71) Year of study: 2015-16

Course Outcomes:
C401.1 Able to analyze the system requirements and model the domain problem.
Able to evaluate the quality of an analysis, and be able to explain how to

C401.2
Improve it.
C401.3 Able to design and build object-oriented systems.
Able to evaluate the quality of a design, and be able to explain how to improve
C401.4
It.
Able to read and write analysis and design documentation in the Unified
C401.5
Modeling Language (UML).

Course Outcomes:

C410.1 Able to describe the role of important elements of simulation and modelling paradigm.
Able to understand the system concept and apply functional modeling method to model the
C410.2
activities of static and dynamic systems.
Able to simulate the operation of a dynamic system and make improvement according to the
C410.3
simulation results.
Able to identify the inputs, analyze, verify and validate the output for discrete-event
C410.4
simulation systems.
3.1.2. CO-PO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1 (six matrices to be mentioned; one per semester from 3rd
to 8th semester) (05)
Course Name: Logic Design (10CS33) Year of Study: 2014-2015
Logic Design
(10CS33)
C203.1 - - - - - - 3 - 2 - 3
C203.2 - - - - - - 3 - 2 - 3
C203.3 - - - - - - 3 - 2 - 3
C203.4 - - - - - - 3 - 2 - 3
C203.5 - - - - - - 3 - 2 - 3
Average - - - - - - 3 - 2 - 3
Course Name: Computer Organization (10CS46) Year of Study: 2014-15

Computer
Organization PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
(10CS46)
C214.1 3 - - - - - 3 - - 3 3
C214.2 - - 2 - - - - - 2 - -
C214.3 - - 3 - - - - - - - -
C214.4 - 3 2 - - - - - 1 - 3
C214.5 - - - - - - - - - 3 3
C214.6 3 - - - - - 3 - - 3 3
Average 3 3 2.33 - - - 3 - 1.5 3 3
Course Name: Computer Network-1 (10CS56) Year of study: 2014-15
Computer
Networks-I PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
(10CS55)
C305.1 - - - - 3 - 2 - - - 3
C305.2 - - - - 3 - 1 - - - 2
C305.3 - - - - 3 - 1 - - - 3
C305.4 - - - - 3 - - - - - 2
C305.5 - - - - 3 - 1 - - - 1
Average - - - - 3 - 1.25 - - - 2.2
Course Name: Computer Graphics & Virtualization (10CS65) Year of Study: 2014-2015

Computer
Graphics
& Virtualization
(10CS65)
C313.1 - - - - - 3 3 - - 3 3
C313.2 2 - - - - 3 - - - 3 3
C313.3 2 - - - - 3 - - - 3 3
C313.4 2 - - - - 3 - - - 3 3
C313.5 2 - - - - 3 - - - 3 3
C313.6 2 - - - - 3 - - - 3 3
Average 2 - - - - 3 3 - - 3 3
Object
Oriented
Modeling PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
& Design
(10CS71)
C401.1 - 2 3 3 1 - - 3 2 2 1
C401.2 - - - - 2 - - 2 - - -
C401.3 - - - - 2 - - 2 3 3 -
C401.4 - - 2 - - - - 2 3 3 -
C401.5 - 3 1 1 - - - 3 3 2 1
Average - 2.5 2 2 1.66 - - 2.4 2.75 2.5 1

System Modelling
& Simulation PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
(10CS82)
C410.1 3 - - - - - - - - - -
C410.2 3 - - - - - - - - 3 -
C410.3 3 3 - - - - 3 2 - 3 -
C410.4 3 - - - - - - 2 - 3 -
C410.5 3 3 - - - - - 2 3 3 -
C410.6 3 3 2 - - - - - - 3 -
C410.7 3 3 - - - - - 1 3 - -
Average 3 3 2 - - - 3 1.75 3 3 -
Course Name: Logic Design (10CS33) Year of Study: 2015-2016
Logic Design PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
(10CS33)
C203.1 - 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C203.2 3 - - - - - - - - - - -
C203.3 - - 3 3 - - - - - - - -
Average 3 2 3 3 - - - - - - - -
Course Name: Computer Organization (10CS46) Year of Study: 2015-16
Computer
Organization PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
(10CS46)
C214.1 3 2 3 - - - - - - - - -
C214.2 - 3 3 2 - - - - - - - -
C214.3 3 2 2 3 - - - - - - - -
C214.4 - 2 3 - 3 - - - - - - -
Average 3 2.25 2.75 2.5 3 - - - - - - -
Course Name: Computer Network-1 (10CS56) Year of study: 2015-16

Computer
Networks-I PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
(10CS55)
C305.1 - - - - 3 - 2 - - - 3 -
C305.2 - - - - 3 - 1 - - - 2 -
C305.3 - - - - 3 - 1 - - - 3 -
C305.4 - - - - 3 - - - - - 2 -
C305.5 - - - - 3 - 1 - - - 1 -
Average - - - - 3 - 1.25 - - - 2.2 -
Course Name: Computer Graphics & Virtualization (10CS65) Year of Study: 2015-2016
Computer PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Graphics
& Virtualization
(10CS65)
C313.1 2 2 2 - - - - - - - - -
C313.2 - 3 3 2 - - - - - - - 1
C313.3 2 2 2 2 - - - - - - - 2
C313.4 - 2 2 - 3 - - - - - - 2
Average 2 2.25 2.25 2 3 - - - - - - 1.66

Object Oriented
Modeling & Design PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
(10CS71)
C401.1 - 2 3 3 1 - - 3 2 2 1 -
C401.2 - - - - 2 - - 2 - - - -
C401.3 - - - - 2 - - 2 3 3 - -
C401.4 - - 2 - - - - 2 3 3 - -
C401.5 - 3 1 1 - - - 3 3 2 1 -
Average - 2.5 2 2 1.66 - - 2.4 2.75 2.5 1 -
System Modelling
& Simulation PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
(10CS82)
C410.1 3 - - - - - - - - - - -
C410.2 3 3 3 3 - - - - - - - -
C410.3 3 3 3 3 - - - - - - - -
C410.4 - - - 3 - - - - - - - -
Average 3 3 3 3 - - - - - - - -
CO-PSO matrices of courses (six matrices to be mentioned; one per semester

from 3rd to 8th semester)

Course Name: Software Engineering (10CS51) Year of Study: 2015-2016
Software Engineering (10CS51) PSO1 PSO2
C3O1.1 1 2
C3O1. 2 2 3
C3O1.3 - 2
C3O1.4 2 -
Average 1.66 2.33
Course Name: UNIX System Programming (10CS62) Year of Study: 2015-2016
UNIX System programming PSO1 PSO2

(10CS62)
C310.1 2 2
C310.2 2 2
C310.3 2 2
C310.4 2 2
Average 2 2
Course Name: C# & .NET PROGRAMMING (10CS761) Year of Study: 2015-2016

C# & .NET PROGRAMMING PSO1 PSO2

10CS761
C406.1 1 1
C406.2 1 -
C406.3 2 -
C406.4 2 1
Average 1.5 1
Course Name: SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE (10CS81) Year of Study: 2015-2016
SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE (10CS81) PSO1 PSO2
C409.1 - 2
C409.2 - 3
C409.3 - 3
C409.4 - 2
Average - 2.5

3.1.3 PROGRAM LEVEL COURSE PO MATRIX OF ALL COURSES INCLUDING FIRST YEAR
COURSE
Table 3.1: Course - Program outcome matrix of all courses 2015-16
PROGRAM LEVEL COURSE -PO MATRIX of All Courses including First Year Courses
PO1 PO1 PSO PSO

Index PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 0 1 PO12 1 2
C101 2.50 2.00
C102 2.67 2.67
C103 2.00 2.40
C104 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C105 1.50 2.33 2.33
C106 2.33 2.00 2.00
C107 2.67 2.67
C108 2.50 3.00 2.00
C110 2.50 2.00
C111 3.00 2.00
C112 3.00 2.50 1.00
C113 2.67 2.33 2.67
C114 3.00 2.00
C115 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00
C116 2.00 3.00
C117 2.00 1.00
C119 2.25 2.25
C120 2.67 2.67
C121 2.00 2.40
C122 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C123 1.50 2.33 2.33
C124 2.33 2.00 2.00
C125 2.67 2.67
C126 2.50 3.00 2.00
C128 2.25 2.25
C129 3.00 2.00
C130 3.00 2.50 1.00
C131 2.67 2.33 2.67
C132 3.00 2.00
C133 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00
C134 2.00 3.00
C135 2.00 1.00
C201 2.50 2.80
C201 2.00 2.80
C202 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
C203 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
C204 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.75
C205 3.00 2.50 3.00 3.00 2.30
C206 3.00 3.00 2.00
C207 2.50 2.50 2.30 1.00 2.00 2.00
C208 2.60 3.00 2.50 3.00 2.60
C208 2.60 3.00 2.50 3.00 2.60
C301 2.50 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 2.50
C302 2.50 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 2.50
C302 3.00 2.50 3.00 2.30 3.00 3.00
C303 2.30 2.00 2.50 3.00
C304 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C305 2.00 2.00 1.50 3.00
C306 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00
C307 2.00 2.00 2.25 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.30
C308 2.75 2.75 3.00 2.00 2.00
C401 2.00 2.50 2.00 2.00
C402 1.50 2.30 2.30 2.00 3.00 1.00
C403 2.00 2.80 3.00 2.00 2.30 2.00 2.50
C404 2.00 2.50 2.60 1.50
C405 3.00 1.75 2.75 1.75 2.50
C406 1.00 1.00 1.70 2.70 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
C407 2.66 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
C408 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
C209 3.00 2.80
C209 2.00 2.00

C210 2.50 2.25 2.25 2.00 3.00 1.75 1.50

C211 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
C212 3.00 3.00 2.25 1.00 1.75
C213 2.50 2.80 3.00
C214 3.00 2.25 2.75 2.50 3.00 1.00
C215 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00
C216 3.00 2.50 2.80
C309 2.66 2.50 2.66 2.33 3.00 3.00 2.50
C310 2.00 2.30 2.30 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00
C311 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00
C312 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 3.00
C313 2.30 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.75 1.00 3.00
C314 2.00 3.00 2.00
C315 2.50 3.00 3.00 1.30
C316 2.50 3.00 2.80 2.80 2.80 3.00 2.80
C316 2.50 3.00 2.75 2.75 2.75 3.00 2.75
C409 3.00 2.30 1.70 2.30
C410 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
C411 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.80
C412 2.70 2.30 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.30 2.30 3.00
C413.1 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00
C413.2 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.33 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
C413.3 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.25
C413.4 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 2.00 2.00
C413.5 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.50 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.67 3.00
C413.6 2.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.75 3.00
C413.7 1.00 1.33 1.33 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.50
C413.8 2.00 1.50 2.00 2.00 1.50 1.00 3.00 2.50 3.00 3.00 2.33 2.00 1.50 2.00
C413.9 2.50 2.67 3.00 3.00 2.67 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.33 2.50 2.50 3.00 2.50
C413.10 3.00 2.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.50 3.00
C413.11 2.50 2.50 3.00 3.00 2.00
C413.12 2.75 2.50 2.33 2.33 2.67 1.75 2.00 1.00 2.25
C413.13 3.00 2.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.50 3.00
C413.14 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.50 3.00 2.50 1.00 2.67 2.50 2.50
C413.15 3.00 2.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.50 3.00
C413.16 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.50 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
C413.17 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
C413.18 2.00 2.75 2.00 2.50 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00
C413.19 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
C413.20 2.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.75 3.00
C413.21 1.50 1.67 1.25 2.00 1.67 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.50 2.00 1.00 2.00
C413.22 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.50 1.00 3.00
C413.23 1.50 1.67 1.25 2.00 1.67 1.50 1.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.50 2.50
C413.24 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 2.25
C413.25 2.50 3.00 2.00 2.00
C413.26 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.50
C413.27 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.33 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00
C413.28 3.00 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 1.33 1.50
C413.29 2.00 1.50 2.00 2.00 1.50 1.00 3.00 2.50 3.00 3.00 2.33 2.00 1.50 2.00
C414 2.03 1.86 1.98 1.99 1.99 2.08 1.80 1.87 2.29 2.42 2.05 2.06
235.3 165.7 136.3 60.0 52.3 73.8 96.4 107.5
total 6 218.89 6 7 150.08 8 0 6 9 80.34 61.85 4 56.05 71.60
subjects 97 92 70 58 58 28 27 29 36 30 30 50 23 30
total
subjects 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111
%
contributio
n 87.39 82.88 63.06 52.25 52.25 25.2 24.3 26.1 32.4 27 27 45.05 20.7 27
2.622 2.486 1.892 1.568 1.568 0.76 0.73 0.78 0.97 0.81 0.81 1.351 0.62 0.81

Fig 3.1 : CO-PO Mapping for the year 2015-2016
3.2 Attainment of Course Outcomes
3.2.1 Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which evaluation of course outcome
is based.
In the Outcome Based Education (OBE), assessment is done through one or more than one processes,
carried out by the institution, that identify, collect, and prepare data to evaluate the achievement of course
outcomes (COs).
Assessment tools are categorized into two methods to assess the course outcomes: Direct methods and
Indirect methods.
Direct methods display the students knowledge and skills from their performance in the continuous
internal assessment tests, semester examinations, seminars, and classroom and laboratory assignments
etc. These methods provide a sampling of what students know and/or can do and provide strong evidence of
student learning.
Indirect methods such as surveys and interviews ask the stakeholders to reflect on students learning. They
assess opinions or thoughts about the graduates knowledge or skills and their valued by different
stakeholders.

Define the course Objectives & Course outcomes
Course Design List out the Activities/Assessment tools

that address each outcome
At the end of the course, assess the

Implement the
students for all the tools
action Plan in
(I.A/Assignment/Seminar/Projects/Mini
next offering of
Projects/group task, etc..,) Course
Set target Recommend an

(Ex 60% of the students score Action plan from
more than 18 in I.A & more than course owner
35 in external exam)
80% of the Direct Assessment

&20 %of the Indirect Assessment
to be combined for course
assessment
Check Whether
Enhancement of Yes Target Achieved No
CO Target
Fig 3.2 : Course Outcome Assessment Process

Table 3.1: Direct and Indirect Assessment Methods
Direct Assessment Methods

Sl no Direct Assessment Method Description
It is a metric to continuously assess the attainment
of course outcomes, students learning domains and thus
improve the teaching learning process. The Internal
Assessment marks in a theory paper shall be based on two
tests generally conducted at the end of 8 and 12 weeks of
1. Internal Assessment Test each semester. An additional test may be conducted for the
desirous students before the end of the semester to give an
opportunity to such students to improve their Internal
Assessment Marks. Average of the better marks obtained
from any two tests shall be the Internal Assessment Marks
for the relevant subject.
Lab Assessment is a metric to mainly assess students

practical knowledge with their designing capabilities .In the
2. Lab Assessment Test case of a Practical, the IA marks shall be based on the
laboratory journals/reports, conduction of experiments and
one practical test.
Semester theory examinations are the metric to assess
3. Theory Semester Examination whether all the course outcomes are attained w.r.t course
objectives framed by the instructor. Semester Examination is
more focused on attainment of course outcomes and uses a
Practical Semester
4. descriptive exam. Practical semester examination focuses on
Examination
conduction of experiments and vice-voice.
The IA marks in the case of mini projects, projects and
5. Seminar
seminars in the final year shall be based on the evaluation at
the end of 8th semester by a committee consisting of the
6. Mini project
Head of the concerned Department and two senior faculty
members of the Department, one of whom shall be the
7. Project
project / seminar guide.
Viva-voce examination in project work shall be conducted
8. Project Work Viva-voce
batch-wise.
Assignment is a metric to mainly assess students
9. Assignment
knowledge/skills/attitude with their designing capabilities.
Indirect Assessment Methods
Collect information from the students to assess the learning
10. Course Exit Survey
outcomes of the course at the end of the semester.

Table 3.2: Course Outcome Assessment methodology, tools and frequency of use for direct and indirect method is described in the table
below:
Assessment Assessment Assessment

Sl No Incharge Reviewer
Method frequency Tool
At the end of 8th Students
Internal PAC
and 12th weeks performance in Course
1 Assessment
of each internal assessment owner PC/HOD
Test
semester. booklets.
Students
performance in
Lab Assessment At the end of the Course PAC
2 conducting
Test semester owner PC/HOD
experiments and
journal writing.
Theory Students
At the end of the
3 Semester performance in University Evaluators
semester
Examination university exams.
Students
Practical performance in
At the end of the
4 Semester conducting University Evaluators
semester
Examination experiments during
university exams.
Seminar PAC
During the 8th Guide/Semi
5 Seminar Rubrics
semester nar PC/HOD
Coordinator
Students
At the end of the
6 Mini project performance in University Evaluators
6th semester
university exams
Project
During the 8 th
Guide/ PAC
7 Project Rubrics
semester PC/HOD
Project
Coordinator
Students
Project Work At the end of the
8 performance in University Evaluators
Viva-voce 8th semester
university exams
CC
Course Exit Course
9 Semester end Student survey PAC
Survey Owner
PC

3.2.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to set attainment levels
(40)
SUBJECT
SUBJECT INDEX C01 C02 C03 CO4 AVERAGE
CODE
MATHS-III 10MAT31 C201 92.57 90.44 76.37 92.07 87.86
MATHS-III 10MAT31 C201 65.4 71.06 55.17 56.24 61.97
EC 10CS32 C202 87.60 79.10 63.10 75.8 76.40
EC 10CS32 C203 65.20 64.30 63.57 64.50 64.39
Logic Design 10CS33 C204 84.15 84.15 81.74 83.34
Logic Design 10CS33 C204 79.76 79.36 80.69 79.93
DMS 10CS34 C205 98.10 97.24 96.90 88.79 95.26
DMS 10CS34 C205 98.10 97.24 96.90 88.79 95.26
DSC 10CS35 C206 58.44 58.87 55.60 60.27 58.30
DSC 10CS35 C206 74.46 74.46 75.51 77.38 75.45
OOPS With C++ 10CS36 C207 78.92 80.63 79.42 74.92 78.47
OOPS With C++ 10CS36 C207 73.12 75.33 74.28 73.05 73.95
DSC LAB 10CSL37 C208 75 72.22 66.67 66.67 70.14
DSC LAB 10CSL37 C208 75 72.25 66.67 66.67 62.51
EC LAB 10CSL38 C209 68.9 85.78 85.34 84.43 81.11
EC LAB 10CSL38 C209 68.9 85.78 85.34 84.43 81.11
SUBJECT
CODE
M-IV 10MAT41 C209 52.37 65.63 41.6 55.8 53.85
M-IV 10MAT41 C209 52.9 52.15 52.22 52.01 52.32
GT 10CS42 C210 51.67 66.93 62.96 62 60.89
GT 10CS42 C210 51.67 66.93 62.96 62 60.89
DAA 10CS43 C211 77.81 76.44 79.09 79.19 78.13
DAA 10CS43 C211 75.58 76.95 77.64 81.43 77.90
USP 10CS44 C212 57.26 75.7 54.64 55.83 60.86

USP 10CS44 C212 51.26 58.82 58.22 58.35 56.66
Microprocessor 10CS45 C213 72.43 73.15 70.34 75.12 72.76
Microprocessor 10CS45 C213 72.44 75.44 71.22 77.04 74.04
CO 10CS46 C214 76.53 76.91 72.45 64.36 72.56
CO 10CS46 C214 79.93 79.17 75.08 67.02 75.30
DAA LAB 10CSL47 C215 71.26 70.46 71.1 70.83 70.91
DAA LAB 10CSL47 C215 71.26 70.46 71.1 70.83 70.91
MP LAB 10CSL48 C216 87 76.89 66.73 85.2 78.96
MP LAB 10CSL48 C216 87 76.89 66.73 85.2 78.96
SUBJECT
CODE
SE 10CS51 C301 56.77 66.24 75.18 55.68 63.47
SE 10CS51 C301 56.77 66.24 75.7 56.77 63.87
System Software 10CS52 C302 70.30 81.81 70.77 77.15 75.01
System Software 10CS52 C302 70.63 83.89 71.31 79.11 76.24
Operating system 10CS53 C303 99.39 96.57 91.92 86.06 93.48
Operating system 10CS53 C303 96.19 73.18 62.10 92.44 80.98
DBMS 10CS54 C304 60.85 92.67 60.07 63.47 69.27
DBMS 10CS54 C304 61.65 94.35 60.84 64.45 70.32
CN-1 10CS55 C305 85.03 94.21 93.25 82.71 88.80
CN-1 10CS55 C305 96.24 94.65 94.33 81.63 91.71
Flat 10CS56 C306 75.12 73.21 75.51 75.21 74.76
Flat 10CS56 C306 71.51 68.98 79.04 80.2 74.93
DBMS LAB 10CSL57 C307 62.78 68.8 62.26 61.65 63.87
DBMS LAB 10CSL58 C307 62.78 68.8 62.26 61.65 63.87
SS AND OS LAB 10CSL58 C308 70.7 82.99 82.81 82.81 79.83
SS AND OS LAB 10CSL59 C308 69.76 81.89 81.7 81.7 78.76

SUBJECT
CODE
ME 10AI61 C309 79.45 80.04 74.97 77.2 77.92
ME 10AI61 C309 79.45 80.04 74.97 77.2 77.92
USP 10CS62 C310 62.27 71.83 61.4 67 65.63
USP 10CS62 C310 62.27 71.83 61.4 67 65.63
CD 10CS63 C311 95.56 93.45 94.91 94.18 94.53
CD 10CS63 C311 87.43 83.96 87.52 88 86.73
CN-II 10CS64 C312 89.55 90.6 91.02 90.7 90.47
CN-II 10CS64 C312 58.74 59.86 60.39 61.5 60.13
CG 10CS65 C313 61.4 63.6 62.5 67.5 63.75
CG 10CS65 C313 61.4 63.6 62.5 67.5 63.75
OR 10CS661 C314 70.25 69.16 70.74 66.9 69.25
OR 10CS661 C314 73.71 71.01 73.79 73.5 73.01
CG LAB 10CSL678 C315 65.25 65.02 75.51 88.2 73.49
CG LAB 10CSL678 C315 62.85 62.49 72.66 85.6 70.90
USP & CD LAB 10CSL68 C316 97.09 94.07 94.06 89.2 93.60
USP & CD LAB 10CSL68 C316 92.64 92.64 92.64 92 92.49
SUBJECT
CODE
OOMD 10CS71 C401 63.94 76.39 64.56 64.4 67.31
OOMD 10CS71 C401 62.63 74.76 62.47 64.5 66.09
ECS 10CS72 C402 91.86 92.24 90.75 89.7 91.14
ECS 10CS72 C402 91.86 92.24 90.75 89.7 91.14
Programming the web 10CS73 C403 88.31 92.75 88.45 92 90.375
Programming the web 10CS73 C403 69.68 76.9 76.49 79.1 75.54
ACA 10CS754 C404 59.35 69.87 59.8 91.5 70.12
ACA 10CS754 C404 62.14 71.3 60.86 92.7 71.74

Java & J2EE 10CS75 C405 49.02 81 80.4 80.8 72.80
Java & J2EE 10CS75 C405 48.55 78.44 79.32 77.9 71.04
C# Programming &
10CS761 C406 51.68 74.99 62.66 71.54 65.22
.Net
C# Programming &
10CS761 C406 51.63 75.17 62.48 73.1 65.59
.Net
Network Lab 10CSL77 C407 81.57 97.54 80.92 80.2 85.05
Network Lab 10CSL77 C407 81.57 97.54 80.92 80.2 85.05
Web Lab 10CSL78 C408 84.71 83.53 82.14 83.3 83.42
Web Lab 10CSL78 C408 89.4 87.26 85.4 88 87.52
SUBJECT
CODE
SA 10CS81 C409 75.29 70.78 56.24 46.5 62.20
SA 10CS81 C409 75.29 70.78 56.24 46.5 62.20
SSM 10CS82 C410 98.04 96.30 94.13 89.57 94.51
SSM 10CS82 C410 97.45 97.59 95.37 94.6 96.25
NMS 10CS834 C411 96.88 81.63 82.03 64.8 81.34
NMS 10CS834 C411 96.88 81.63 82.03 64.8 81.34
ST 10CS842 C412 97.09 95.82 94 90.2 94.27
ST 10CS842 C412 97.09 95.82 94 90.2 94.27
Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes
3.3.1. Describe assessment tools and processes used for assessing the attainment of each POs & PSOs
PO Assessment Tools
Assessment tools are categorized into Direct and Indirect methods to assess the programme educational
objectives, program outcomes and course outcomes.
Direct methods display the students knowledge and skills from their performance in the continuous
assessment tests, endsemester examinations, presentations, and classroom assignments etc. these methods
provide a sampling of what students know and/or can do and provide strong evidence of student learning.
Indirect methods such as surveys and interviews ask the stakeholders to reflect on student s learning.
They assess opinions or thoughts about the graduates knowledge or skills and their valued by
different stakeholders.

Use of Rubrics for Evaluation and Assessment of POs
The Course/Programme outcomes are difficult to measure such as assessing critical thinking, creativity,
analytical skills, and problem solving etc. Hence the department has adopted Criterion Referenced Rubrics
to assess the POs and COs wherever appropriate. The Rubric criteria are either developed by department
faculty or sometimes even with consultation with students and distributed before an assignment, project or
test.
Rubrics are used for both formative and summative assessment of students. Same rubric is used for
assessing an outcome so that the faculty is able to assess student progress and maintain the record of the
same for each student. The rubrics are shared with students before being evaluated so that they are aware of
the performance criteria and their weightage.
Describe the assessment process that periodically documents and demonstrates the degree to which the
Programme Outcomes are attained. Also include information on:
a) Listing and description of the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of
each the Programme Outcome is based. Examples of data collection processes may include, but are not
limited to, specific exam questions, student portfolios, internally developed assessment exams, project
presentations, nationally-normed exams, oral exams, focus groups, industrial advisory committee;
b) The frequency with which these assessment processes are carried out.
Table 3.3: PO Direct Assessment Methods
PO Direct Assessment Methods
Direct Assessment
Sl no Description
Method
It is a metric to continuously assess the
attainment of course outcomes, students learning
domains and thus improve the teaching learning
process. The Internal Assessment marks in a theory
paper shall be based on two tests generally conducted at
the end of 8 and 12 weeks of each semester. An
1. Internal Assessment Test
additional test may be conducted for the desirous
students before the end of the semester to give an
opportunity to such students to improve their Internal
Assessment Marks. Average of the better marks
obtained from any two tests shall be the Internal
Assessment Marks for the relevant subject.
Lab Assessment is a metric to mainly assess
students practical knowledge with their designing
2. Lab Assessment Test capabilities .In the case of a Practical, the IA marks shall
be based on the laboratory journals/reports, conduction
of experiments and one practical test.

Theory Semester
3. Semester theory examinations are the metric to assess
Examination
whether all the course outcomes are attained w.r.t course
objectives framed by the instructor. Semester
Examination is more focused on attainment of course
outcomes and uses a descriptive exam. Practical
Practical Semester semester examination focuses on conduction of
4.
Examination experiments and vice-voice.
5. Seminar The IA marks in the case of mini projects, projects and

seminars in the final year shall be based on the
evaluation at the end of 8th semester by a committee
6. Mini project consisting of the Head of the concerned Department and
two senior faculty members of the Department, one of
7. Project whom shall be the project / seminar guide.
Viva-voce examination in project work shall be

8. Project Work Viva-voce
conducted batch-wise.
Table 3.4: PO Indirect Assessment Methods
PO Indirect Assessment Methods
Indirect Assessment
Sl no Description
Method
Alumni: Survey Collect variety of information about programme

1.
Questionnaire satisfaction and college from the graduate.
2. Collect the feedback about the programme at the time of

Program Exit Survey
graduation.
3. Alumni: PEO Survey Collect variety of information about the program after 2
Questionnaire years of graduation.
4. Collect information from the students to assess the learning

Course Exit Survey
Parent: Survey Collect variety of information about program satisfaction

5.
Questionnaire and college from parents/guardians.
Collect variety of information about the graduate skills,

6. Employers Feedback
capabilities and opportunities.

Student Feedback (About Collect variety of information about outcome Based

7.
OBE) education in teaching and learning process.
Collect variety of information about facilities within the

8. Feedback on Facilities
college from students.
Program Outcome Assessment methodology, tools and frequency of use for direct and indirect method is
described in the table below:
Table 3.5: PO Assessment Methodology, tools and frequency of use for direct and indirect method

Students
th
At the end of 8 performance
Internal Assessment Course PAC
1. and 12th weeks of in internal
Test owner PC/HOD
each semester. assessment
booklets.
Students
performance
Lab Assessment At the end of the in conducting Course PAC
2.
Test semester experiments owner PC/HOD
and journal
writing.
Students
Theory Semester At the end of the performance
3. University Evaluators
Examination semester in university
exams.
Students
performance
in conducting
Practical Semester At the end of the
4. experiments University Evaluators
Examination semester
during
university
exams.
Seminar
During the 8th Guide/Semi PAC
5. Seminar Rubrics
semester nar PC/HOD
Coordinator
Students
At the end of the performance
6. Mini project University Evaluators
6th semester in university
exams

Project
During the 8th Guide/ PAC
7. Project Rubrics
semester Project PC/HOD
Coordinator
Students
Project Work Viva- At the end of the performance
8. University Evaluators
voce 8th semester in university
exams
CC
Student Course
9 Course Exit Survey Semester end PAC
survey Owner
PC

Exit report Alumni Association

Program Exit
1. Annually from Committee IQAC
Survey
graduates (AAC)
Alumni: PEO Exit report Alumni Association

2. Survey Annually after 2 years Committee IQAC
Questionnaire of graduation (AAC)
Parents survey PAC

Parent: Survey
3. Twice in a year and focus Parent Coordinator PC
Questionnaire
discussions IQAC
Performance Alumni Association

Employers AAC
4. Annually report on Committee
Feedback
employees (AAC)
Student Feedback Student

5. Twice in a year PC IQAC
(About OBE) survey
Feedback on Student
6. Twice in a year IAC IQAC
Facilities survey

The Step-by-step process for assessing Program Outcomes is shown in the below figure:
Analysis of each Outcome into elements by

Program Coordinator
Set of Attributes are defined Generate well designed Surveys to

for each element assess the outcome
Define performance indicators and

their targets
To address the outcomes, each outcome is

assessed in several courses
Course owner collects the qualitative and

quantitative data used for outcome assessment in
a continual process
Program Assessment Committee analyze

collected Data
Department Advisory Board Recommends

content delivery methods/course Outcome
outcomes/curriculum Attained

Fig 3.2 : Step-by-step process for assessing Program Outcomes
The Step-by-step process for assessing Program Outcomes is shown in the table 3.6
Table 3.6: Process for Assessing Program Outcomes
Step 1: The program coordinator analyses each outcome into elements (different abilities specified in the
outcome) and a set of attributes are defined for each element. (actions that explicitly specify mastery of
the abilities specified). In addition generate well designed surveys to assess the outcome.
Step 2: For each outcome define performance indicators (Assessment criteria) and their targets.
Step 3: Identify / Select courses that address the outcome (each course contributes to at least one of the
outcomes). Hence, each outcome is assessed in several courses to ensure that students acquire an
appropriate level in terms of knowledge / skills of an outcome
Step 4: The course owner collects the qualitative and quantitative data and uses for continual process of
outcome assessment.
Step 5: The Program Assessment Committee analyze the collected data. If the assessed data meets the
performance target which are specified in step 2 , the outcome is attained , otherwise consider step 6
Step 6: The Department Advisory Board recommends content delivery methods / course outcomes /
curriculum improvements as needed.

Course Outcome
Next
Course
CO-PO Mapping
PO Attainment
Setting the
Weightage for CO-
PO Mapping
CO
PSO
Attainment Attainment
Setting the Target

for CO Assessment
Assessment
Fig 3.3: Process of Program Outcome Assessment

Action Plan for

Closing PO Gap
PO/PSO
PO/ PSO
attainment Gap
PO attainment Target No
Check for
Attainment
Yes
Enhance PO
Targets
PO/PSO attainment PO/ PSO (Mini PO/PSO

(courses) Projects, Projects, (Workshop
Seminars) /FDP/GL/IV)
C201 C40X
Fig 3.4 :Outlines of steps before PO / PSO Attainment

Program outcomes (PO) framed by the department of Computer Science and Engineering for the
academic year 2013-14 and 2014-2015
Program outcomes
PO Number Sl.No Program outcomes

Graduates will possess knowledge on applying mathematics, applied sciences and
PO1 a
foundational engineering concepts.
Graduates will possess strong fundamental concepts on data structures, database
PO2 b technologies, operating systems, compiler designs, advanced programming,
software engineering.
Graduates will develop expertise, confidence for self and lifelong
PO3 c
learning through management techniques.
Graduates will possess various leadership and management skills with best
PO4 d
professionalism and ethical values with social concern.
Graduates will demonstrate with an ability to deploy, analyze, troubleshoot,
PO5 e maintain manage and secure the computer networks and design various
networking abilities.
Graduates will demonstrate to design and develop web solutions with user
PO6 f
friendly and rich graphical user interfaces.
Graduates will demonstrate and possess fundamental knowledge on computer
PO7 g architecture, embedded systems, design of digital, analog systems and
communications using various hardware concepts.
Graduates will be able to communicate with confidence in both verbal and return
PO8 h
forms with great professionalism.
Graduates will demonstrate with an ability to design, develop, test
PO9 i
and debug the software.
Graduates will demonstrate excellent programming, analytical, logical and
PO10 j
problem solving skills.
Graduates can participate and succeed in competitive examination and interact
PO11 k
with their peers in industry and society as engineering professionals.

Mapping of graduates attributes to the program outcomes of Computer Science and Engineering
Department.
PO PO PO PO PO PO PO1 PO1
PO1 PO2 PO6
3 4 5 7 8 9 0 1
GA1 Engineering Knowledge x
GA2 Problem Analysis x x

Design / Development of
GA3 x x
solutions
Conduct investigation of
GA4 complex engineering x x
problems
GA5 Modern Tool Usage x
GA6 Engineer and Society x

Environment and
GA7 x x
sustainability
GA8 Ethics x
GA9 Individual and Team Work x x
GA10 communication x
Project management &
GA11 x
Finance
GA12 Lifelong Learning x

Program outcomes (PO) Academic year 2015 -2016
PO Number PROGRAMME OUTCOMES
Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science,

PO1 engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex
engineering problems.
Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex
PO2 engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of
mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering

PO3 problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs
with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural,
societal, and environmental considerations.
Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and

research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data,
PO4
and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and
PO5 modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex
engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to
PO6 assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent
responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.
Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional
PO7 engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the
knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
PO8 Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities
and norms of the engineering practice.
PO9 Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or
leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the

PO10 engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend
and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and
give and receive clear instructions.
Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the

engineering and management principles and apply these to one's own work, as a
PO11 member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary
environments.
Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to
PO12 engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological
change.

PSO
PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES (PSO)
Number
PSO1 Ability to model, design and implement computer network systems to meet specified
requirements.
PSO2 Ability to build software engineering system of varying complexity.

3.3.2 3.3.23.3.2Provide
Provide results of evaluation of each POresults
Provide & PSOof
results
ofevaluation
evaluation of each PO & PSO
of each PO & PSO
Criterion
Criterion 4 4
CO-PO ATTAINMENT OF ALL COURSES 2015-16
SUBJECT CODE INDEX PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2
10MAT3
M-III 1 C201 2.50 2.58
10MAT3
M-III 1 C201 1.64 2.30 0.84
EC 10CS32 C202 1.59 1.59 1.59 0.79
EC 10CS32 C203 1.55 1.55 1.55 0.77
LD 10CS33 C204 2.44 2.52 2.45 2.45
LD 10CS33 C204 2.38 2.39 2.42 2.42
DMS 10CS34 C205 2.36 2.36 2.36 2.36 2.16
DMS 10CS34 C205 2.36 2.36 2.36 2.36 2.16
DSC 10CS35 C206 1.95 1.62 1.95 1.92 1.49
DSC 10CS35 C206 2.27 2.27 2.27 2.28 2.28
OOPS 10CS36 C207 2.35 2.35 1.57
OOPS 10CS36 C207 2.22 2.22 1.48
DSC LAB 10CS37 C208 2.22 2.22 2.07 0.89 1.78 1.78
DSC LAB 10CS37 C208 2.28 2.29 2.13 0.91 1.83 1.83
EC LAB 10CS38 C209 2.23 2.43 2.03 2.45 2.03
EC LAB 10CS38 C209 2.22 2.57 2.14 2.58 2.23
SE 10CS51 C301 1.98 1.57 1.58 2.35 2.38 1.96 1.95 2.36 1.97 1.97
SE 10CS51 C301 2.21 1.76 1.77 2.65 2.64 2.21 2.22 2.64 2.21 2.22
SS 10CS52 C302 2.38 1.98 2.34 1.78 2.34 2.38
SS 10CS52 C302 2.61 2.17 2.59 1.96 2.59 2.61
OS 10CS53 C303 2.14 1.84 2.30 2.68
OS 10CS53 C303 2.21 1.88 2.45 2.82
DBMS 10CS54 C304 1.83 2.78 1.80 1.90 1.90
DBMS 10CS54 C304 1.85 2.83 1.83 1.93 1.93
CN-1 10CS55 C305 1.67 1.68 1.25 2.51
CN-1 10CS55 C305 1.70 1.71 1.28 2.55
Flat 10CS56 C306 2.70 2.64 2.54 2.54 1.74
Flat 10CS56 C306 2.57 2.48 2.69 2.69 1.74

DBMS
LAB 10CSL57 C307 1.87 1.87 2.10 2.80 0.93 0.94 1.25
DBMS
LAB 10CSL57 C307 1.87 1.87 2.10 2.80 0.93 0.94 1.25
SS&OS
LAB 10CSL58 C308 2.65 2.65 2.89 1.93 1.93
SS&OS
LAB 10CSL58 C308 2.60 2.60 2.84 1.89 1.89
OOMD 10CS71 C401 1.94 2.43 1.94 1.96
OOMD 10CS71 C401 1.90 2.38 1.87 1.92
ECS 10CS72 C402 1.37 2.05 2.05 1.83 2.69 0.90
ECS 10CS72 C402 1.42 2.12 2.12 1.87 2.85 0.95
WEB 10CS73 C403 1.76 2.47 2.70 1.80 2.04 1.80 2.23
WEB 10CS73 C403 1.92 2.65 2.89 1.93 2.17 1.93 2.41
ACA 10CS74 C404 1.84 2.30 2.50 1.39

ACA 10CS74 C404 1.77 2.24 2.40 1.35
Java 10CS75 C405 2.78 1.63 2.56 1.63 2.33
Java 10CS75 C405 2.66 1.55 2.44 1.55 2.21
C# 10CS76 C406 0.94 0.95 1.57 2.48 2.81 1.87 1.89 1.87
C# 10CS76 C406 0.93 0.93 1.56 2.47 2.78 1.85 1.88 1.85
N/W Lab 10CSL77 C407 2.60 1.94 2.89 2.91
N/W Lab 10CSL77 C407 2.60 2.89 2.91
web Lab 10CSL78 C408
web Lab 10CSL78 C408 2.62 2.63 2.63 2.64 2.64

10MAT4
M-IV 1 C209 1.41 1.82
10MAT4
M-IV 1 C209 1.56 1.56
GT 10CS42 C210 2.14 1.93 1.93 1.71 2.58 1.50 1.28
GT 10CS42 C210 2.14 1.93 1.93 1.71 2.58 1.50 1.28
DAA 10CS43 C211 2.70 1.80 1.80 2.70 2.70
DAA 10CS43 C211 2.06 1.37 1.37 2.06 2.06
USP 10CS44 C212 2.53 2.51 1.90 0.84 1.47
USP 10CS44 C212 2.63 2.63 1.31 0.88 1.54
MP 10CS45 C213 2.18 2.18 2.18
MP 10CS45 C213 2.22 2.23 2.25
CO 10CS46 C214 2.54 1.90 2.32 2.12 2.52 0.84
CO 10CS46 C214 2.70 2.01 2.46 2.24 2.68 0.89

DAA
LAB 10CSL47 C215 2.66 1.77 1.77 1.77 2.66
DAA
LAB 10CSL47 C215 2.66 1.77 1.77 1.77 2.66
MP LAB 10CSL48 C216 2.58 2.15 2.37
MP LAB 10CSL48 C216 2.58 2.15 2.37
ME 10AI61 C309 2.65 2.48 2.65 2.31 2.99 2.98 2.48
ME 10AI61 C309 2.65 2.48 2.65 2.31 2.99 2.98 2.48
USP 10CS62 C310 1.85 2.08 2.08 1.84 2.78 1.85 1.85
USP 10CS62 C310 1.85 2.08 2.08 1.84 2.78 1.85 1.85
CD 10CS63 C311 2.72 2.72 2.72 2.72 1.81
CD 10CS63 C311 2.79 2.79 2.79 2.79 1.86
CN-II 10CS64 C312 1.81 1.81 1.81 0.90 2.71
CN-II 10CS64 C312 1.80 1.80 1.80 0.90 2.71
CG 10CS65 C313 2.14 1.84 1.84 0.92 2.53 0.92 2.76
CG 10CS65 C313 2.14 1.84 1.84 0.92 2.53 0.92 2.76
OR 10CS661 C314 1.78 2.67 1.78
OR 10CS661 C314 1.88 2.82 1.88
CG LAB 10CSL67 C315 2.43 2.91 2.89 1.21
CG LAB 10CSL67 C315 2.34 2.81 2.80 1.18
USP LAB 10CSL68 C316 2.31 2.77 2.54 2.54 1.16 2.77 2.54
USP LAB 10CSL68 C316 2.25 2.82 2.58 2.58 2.58 2.82 2.58

SA 10CS81 C409 2.54 1.97 1.27 1.97
SA 10CS81 C409 2.54 1.97 1.27 1.97
SSM 10CS82 C410 2.91 2.88 2.88 2.89 2.90
SSM 10CS82 C410 2.90 2.89 2.89 2.89 2.89
NMS 10CS834 C411 2.91 2.95 2.92 1.96 0.97 1.96 0.97 2.68
NMS 10CS834 C411 2.91 2.95 2.92 1.96 0.97 1.96 0.97 2.68
ST 10CS842 C412 2.58 2.28 2.60 2.60 2.60 1.94 1.94 2.45 2.19 2.19 2.92
ST 10CS842 C412 2.58 2.28 2.60 2.60 2.60 1.94 1.94 2.45 2.19 2.19 2.92
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 2.97 1.96 2.94 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.97 2.97 2.29 2.97 2.91 2.91 2.91
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 2.88 2.88 1.92 1.92 2.88 1.92 2.88 1.92 2.89 2.91 0.97 2.17
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 2.97 2.00 2.97 2.94 2.48 1.96 1.98
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 1.93 1.92 2.90 2.48 2.92 2.88 1.96 2.42 2.90
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 1.95 1.95 0.98 2.97 2.94 1.97 0.98 2.97 2.97 2.97 0.99 1.72 2.94
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 0.96 1.25 1.25 1.88 0.94 1.90 1.86 2.38
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 1.97 1.44 1.96 1.92 1.45 0.98 2.92 2.44 2.88 2.96 2.28 1.92 1.48 1.93
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 2.38 2.52 2.81 2.81 2.53 2.83 1.86 2.84 2.83 2.21 2.35 2.37 2.83 2.38
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 2.97 2.46 2.94 2.94 2.94 1.98 2.97 2.96 2.94 1.96 2.46 2.95
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 2.43 2.40 2.85 2.91 1.94
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 2.71 2.46 2.32 2.31 2.63 1.73 1.99 1.00 2.22
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 2.97 2.45 2.91 2.91 2.94 1.98 2.97 2.95 2.94 1.94 2.45 2.94
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 2.76 2.85 1.84 2.41 2.78 2.41 0.93 2.53 2.37 2.33
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 2.76 2.31 2.78 2.78 2.81 1.84 2.76 2.80 2.84 1.85 2.34 2.80
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 1.92 1.92 2.88 2.40 2.88 1.92 1.92 2.97 2.88 2.97 2.90 2.88 2.43
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 2.98 3.00 2.96 2.96 2.96 3.00 3.00 2.98 2.98 2.97 2.98 2.97
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 2.00 2.75 2.00 2.50 2.00 2.00 2.67 2.00
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 1.96 1.97 1.96 1.96 2.45 1.97 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 1.97 1.97 0.99 2.97 2.97 1.98 0.99 2.97 2.97 2.97 0.99 1.73 2.96
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 1.49 1.65 1.24 1.99 1.64 1.49 0.99 0.99 1.48 1.97 0.99 1.97
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 1.98 1.97 2.62 0.98 0.97 0.98 2.46 0.97 2.29
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 1.42 1.57 1.18 1.90 1.56 1.41 1.41 0.94 1.40 1.88 0.94 1.89 2.35 2.37
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 2.00 2.00 2.98 0.97 2.96 1.95 2.22
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 2.30 2.80 1.87 1.85
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 2.88 2.72 1.92 1.81 2.00 3.00 2.96 1.00 1.49
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 1.98 1.99 1.98 2.00 2.98 3.00 1.99 1.98
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 2.97 1.94 2.46 2.97 2.91 1.98 0.99 2.94 2.94 1.31 1.47
PROJEC
T 10CS85 C413 1.80 1.41 1.80 1.64 1.29 0.93 2.53 2.40 2.47 2.70 2.04 1.64 1.33 1.97
Seminar 10CS86 C414 2.00 1.60 1.90 1.89 1.89 2.00 1.70 1.80 2.20 2.40 2.00 2.00

AVERAG
E 2.21 2.17 2.21 2.08 2.36 2.06 1.92 2.32 2.51 2.54 2.01 1.94 2.17 2.20
TARGET 2.44 2.40 2.42 2.35 2.57 2.13 2.01 2.47 2.66 2.65 2.06 2.17 2.44 2.39
CO-PO ATTAINMENT OF ALL COURSES 2015-16

3.00
level of attainment---->
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00 AVERAGE
0.50 TARGET
0.00
PO1
PO2
PO3
PO4
PO5
PO6
PO7
PO8
PO9
PO10
PO11
PO12
PSO1
PSO2
PO& PSO----->

CRITERION 4
Students Performance

CRITERION 4 Students Performance 150
4. Students Performance (150)
Item
CAY CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3 CAYm4
(Information to be provided cumulatively
(2016- (2015- (2014- (2013- (2012-
for all the shifts with explicit headings,
17) 16) 15) 14) 13)
wherever applicable)
Sanctioned intake strength of the program (N) 120 120 120 120 120
Total number of students admitted in first

year minus number of students migrated to
112 111 109 105 100
other programs/institution plus no. of students
migrated to this program (N1)
Number of students admitted in 2nd year in
17 31 25 19 14
the same batch via lateral entry (N2)
Separate division students, if applicable (N3) 06 06 06 06 05
Total number of students admitted in the

Program 135 148 140 130 119
(N1 + N2 + N3)
160
140
120
100 N
N1
80
N2
60 N3
N1+N2+N3
40
20
0
CAY CAYM1 CAYM2 CAYM3 CAYM4
Fig. 4.1 Students Performance

Number of students who have

successfully graduated without
backlogs in any semester / year of study
N1 +N2 +N3 (Without Backlog means no
Year of entry (As defined compartment or failures in any semester
above) / year of study)
III IV
I Year II Year
Year Year
CAY 2015-16 148 84
CAYm1 2014-2015 140 85 37

CAYm2 2013-14 130 88 80 34
CAYm3 2012-13 119 80 71 60 15
CAYm4 (LYG) 2011-
126 87 66 58 42
12
CAYm5 (LYGm1)
138 92 77 60 45
2010-11
CAYm6 (LYGm2)
119 81 70 55 40
2009-10
100
No of Students Graduated-->
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
I Year
20
10 II Year
0 III Year
IV Year
Year of Entry -->
Fig. 4.2 Students Result Analysis

Number of students who have successfully

N1 +N2 +N3 graduated
Year of entry (As defined
above)
I Year II Year III Year IV Year
CAY 2015-16 148 84
CAYm1 2014-2015 140 85 59
CAYm2 2013-14 130 88 84 101
CAYm3 2012-13 119 80 90 92 89
CAYm4 (LYG) 2011-12 126 90 77 101 114

CAYm5 (LYGm1)
138 92 77 88 90
2010-11
CAYm6 (LYGm2)
119 81 75 79 97
2009-10
120
100
No of Students Graduated -->
80
60
40
I Year
20
II Year
0 III Year
IV Year
Year of Entry -->
Fig. 4.3 Students Result Analysis

4.1. Enrolment Ratio (20)
Year N1 N Marks Enrolment Ratio = N1/N
2016-17 118 120 20 98.3
2015-16 117 120 20 97.5
2014-15 115 120 20 95.8
2013-14 111 120 18 92.5
2012-13 105 120 18 87.5
2011-12 114 120 20 95.00
Average Student Enrollment 20 94.43
140
Total No. of Students -->
120
100
80
60
40 N1
20 N2
0 N1/N2
Academic Year --->
Fig. 4.4 Enrolment Ratio

4.2. Success Rate in the stipulated period of the program (40)
4.2.1. Success Rate without backlogs in any semester/Year of study (25)
LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 LYGm3

Item (CAYm2) (CAYm3) (CAYm4) (CAYm5)
2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 2009-10
Number of students admitted in the

corresponding First Year
+admitted in 2nd Year Via lateral 119 126 138 119
entry and separate division, if
applicable ( X )
Number of students who have

graduated without backlogs in the 15 40 45 42
stipulated period ( Y )
Success Index (SI) = (Y / X ) 0.17 0.317 0.326 0.352
Average Success Index 0.291
Success Rate without backlogs in any year of study = (25 * Avg. SI) = 7.28
8
7.28
7
1
0.317 0.326 0.352 0.291
0.17
0
LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 LYGm3 Avg. SI Success Rate
Fig. 4.5 Success Rate without backlogs in any semester/Year of study

4.2.2. Success rate in stipulated period (15)
LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 LYGm3

Item (CAYm2) (CAYm3) (CAYm4) (CAYm5)
2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 2009-10
Number of students admitted in
the corresponding First Year
+admitted in 2nd Year Via lateral 119 126 138 119
entry and separate division, if
applicable ( X )
Number of Students who have
graduated in the stipulated period 89 102 90 97
(Y )
Success index (SI) = (Y / X ) 0.7478 0.8095 0.6521 0.8151
Average Success Index 0.7561
Success Rate = (15 Average SI) = 11.34
12 11.34
10
2
0.7478 0.8095 0.6521 0.8151 0.7561
0
LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 LYGm3 Avg. SI Success Rate
Fig. 4.6 Success rate in stipulated period

4.3. Academic performance in Third Year (15 )
CAY CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3

Academic Performance
2015-16 2014-15 2013-14 2012-13
Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all

6.4 5.9 8.7 7.4
successful students (x)
Total no. of successful students (y) 95 72 102 92
Total no. of students appeared in the

114 122 117 123
examination (Z)
API = X * (Y/Z) 4.96 3.48 7.58 5.53
Average API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3+

5.38
AP4)/4
Academic Performance = (1.5 * Average API) = 8.07
10
8 7.58
4.96
API --->
6
8.07
3.48 5.53
4 5.38
2
0
API
Academic Year -->
Fig. 4.7 Academic performance in Third Year

4.4. Academic performance in Second Year (15)

Academic Performance
2015-16 2014-15 2013-14 2012-13
Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all

5.08 4.91 4.67 4.96
successful students (x)
Total no. of successful students (y) 59 60 57 62
Total no. of students appeared in the

116 122 122 125
examination (Z)
API = X * (Y/Z) 2.58 2.41 2.14 2.46
Average API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3+ AP4)/4 2.39
Academic Performance Level = (1.5 * Average API) = 3.59
4
3 2.58 3.59
2.41
API --->
2.14 2.46
2 2.39
1
0
CAY
CAYm1
API
CAYm2
CAYm3
Average API
Academic
Performance
Level
Academic Year -->
Fig. 4.8 Academic performance in Second Year

4.5. Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship (40)

Item
2015-16 2014-15 2013-14 2012-13
Total No. of Final Year Students(N) 105 122 121 123
No. of Students placed in companies or

28 35 55 18
Government Sector(X)
No. of students admitted to higher
studies with valid qualifying scores
02 17 18 10
(Gate or equivalent State or National
Level Tests, GRE, GMAT etc.) (y)
No. of students turned entrepreneur in
00 02 01 01
engineering/technology (Z)
X+y+z= 30 54 74 29
Placement Index: (x + y+ z)/N 0.29 0.45 0.62 0.24
Average placement =(P1 + P2 +

0.40
P3+p4)/4
Assessment Points = (40 * Average placement) = 16

18
16
16
14
Placement Index -->
12
10
8
6
4
2 0.45 0.62 0.4
0.29 0.24
0
CAY CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3 Average Assessment
placement points
Academic Year -->
Fig. 4.9 Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship

4.6. Professional Activities (20)

4.6.1. Professional societies / chapters and organising engineering events (5)
4.6.1.1 Computer Society of India

Rao Bahadur Y. Mahabaleswarappa Engineering College is an Educational
Institution Member of Computer Society of India with membership number
M10206, till 28th February 2021.
Following Faculties of Computer Science & Engineering department are members
of Computer Society of India.
Sl. No Name of the Staff Department Professional body Membership No.
Dr.T.Hanumantha Computer Science & Computer Society of
1 F8001364
Reddy Engineering India
Computer Science & Computer Society of
2 Dr H.Girisha F8001365
Engineering India
Computer Science & Computer Society of
3 Sapna Kulkarni F8001365
Engineering India
Professional chapters organized under Computer Society of India
Sl.No Professional chapter Place Year
Importance and awareness of CSI to

Computer Science & Engineering R Y M Engineering
1 6th April 2016
College, Ballari
Students

4.6.1.2 The Indian Society for Technical Education
Following Faculties of Computer Science & Engineering department are members of The
Indian Society for Technical Education
Sl. No Name of the Staff Department Professional body Membership No.
The Indian Society
Computer Science &
1 Dr H.Girisha for Technical LM111278
Engineering
Education
The Indian Society
Computer Science &
2 D.Saimadhavi for Technical LM111287
Engineering
Education
Computer Science & The Indian Society
3 Nagaveni.B.Biradar Engineering for Technical LM111279
Education
4 D.V.Swetha Ramana Engineering for Technical LM65133
Education
5 R.P.Rajeshwari Engineering for Technical LM111281
Education
6 H.Chidananda Engineering for Technical LM111280
Education
7 K.S.Aparna Engineering for Technical LM65136
Education
8 S.G.Anuradha Engineering for Technical LM65138
Education
9 K.Suresh Engineering for Technical LM111282
Education
10 K.M.Shiva Prasad Engineering for Technical LM111283
Education
11 B.Naveen Kumar Engineering for Technical LM111293
Education
12 Bergi VeereshaGowda Engineering for Technical LM111288
Education
13 SrideviMaliPatil Engineering for Technical LM111285
Education
14 R Sampath Kumar Engineering for Technical LM111286
Education


15 Pampapathi B M Engineering for Technical LM111289
Education
16 M Nagaraj Engineering for Technical LM111290
Education
17 Roshan D Engineering for Technical LM111284
Education
18 Puneeth GJ Engineering for Technical LM111292
Education
19 Vinutha Prasanth Engineering for Technical LM111291
Education
Professional chapters organized under The Indian Society for Technical Education
One day Seminar on Role of E- R Y M Engineering

1 15th March 2016
Governance projects in Digital India College, Ballari

4.6.1.3 Association for Computing Machinery ( ACM )

Rao Bahadur Y. Mahabaleswarappa Engineering College is an Educational Institution
Member of Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) chartered on 31st Oct 2016.
Following are the members of ACM Student chapter of Computer Science &
Engineering department.
Sl.No Name of the Member Member Number Affiliation

1 Kavitha Juliet 0042888 RYMEC
2 Rajashwari R P 9556232 RYMEC
3 Meghana k 3238503 RYMEC
4 Sharath K 7186474 RYMEC
5 Sai kiran 6488966 RYMEC
6 G kiran 9909602 RYMEC
7 K sai Kiran 6025940 RYMEC
8 Lahari Kolli 1060741 RYMEC
9 Vishal Kulkarni 9061336 RYMEC
10 Kiran Kumar 6145823 RYMEC
11 Divya M 940445 RYMEC
12 Aditya Mundlur 7784843 RYMEC
13 M Swathi 3420615 RYMEC
Professional chapters organized under The Association for Computing Machinery

( ACM )
Two days workshop on Android R Y M Engineering

1 October 2016
Applications College, Ballari

4.6.2. Publication of technical magazines, newsletters, etc. ( 5 )
Sl.No Newsletter Term
1 PRERANA Half Year

4.6.3. Participation in inter-institute events by students of the programme of

Study (10)
Year of
Sl.No. Student Name Title of paper
publication
Automated Face Detection &
Recognition For Detecting
1 Akshatha.S 2016
Impesonation Of Candidate In
Examination System
2 Kothapalli Jyothi 2016
Examination System
3 Gudipati Ashalatha 2016
Examination System
4 Kavya.B 2016
Examination System
An Integrated Sytem For Regional
5 Shwetha Environmental Monitoring And 2016
Management Based On Iot
6 Kalpana Environmental Monitoring And 2016
7 Shruthi Environmental Monitoring And 2016
8 Bhagyasri Environmental Monitoring And 2016
Security Enhancements For
Mobile Adhoc Networks With
9 Vani 2016
Trust Management Using
Uncertain Reasoing
10 Shainaj.B 2016
Uncertain Reasoing
11 Shilpa 2016
Uncertain Reasoing
12 Lakshmi 2016
Uncertain Reasoing
13 Chaitra.R Department Information System 2016

Knowsoft
Department Information System
14 Kavya.An 2016
Knowsoft
15 Poornima.H 2016
Knowsoft
16 Karibasamma.K 2016
Knowsoft
Cell Phone Operated Mobile Bug
17 Ramyashree.G.R 2016
Using Micro Controller
18 Shwetha.T.S 2016
19 Vasanthi.K 2016
Touch Screeen Based On Nurse
20 Sharon Attendant Calling System For 2016
Physically Impaired
21 Vaishnavi.K Attendant Calling System For 2016
Physically Impaired
22 Shainaaz Attendant Calling System For 2016
Physically Impaired
23 Saraswathi Attendant Calling System For 2016
Physically Impaired
Do It Yourself Digital Agrculture
24 Anusha M 2016
IOT Platform
25 Aruna K 2016
IOT Platform
26 Himabindu 2016
IOT Platform
27 Aruna Jyothi 2016
Iot Platform
Security Enhancement For Mobile
Adhoc Networks With Trust
28 Shainaz B 2016
Management Using Uncertain
Reasoning
29 Vani S G 2016
Reasoning
30 P Lakshmidevi 2016
Reasoning
31 Shilpa 2016
Reasoning

32 Ayub Saddiq Ekbazar.com e-commerece 2016

33 Mallikarjun K Ekbazar.com e-commerece 2016
34 Rajesh K Ekbazar.com e-commerece 2016
Intrusion Detection System
35 Basavaraj M 2015
Against Bandwidth Ddos Attack
Soumya Raj Kumari , Automated Examination paper
36 2015
SwethaShree R.N Evaluating system STJIT
Defending by Deception: A
37 Sushmitha Raj Adoni 2015
Honey pot Approach
38 Navera Fatima , Blue Brain 2015

Sowmya
Different IDS Frameworks for
39 Tulasi Gayatri Devi 2015
Hypervisor Security
Fog Computing to protect real and
40 Thogaricheti Ashwini 2015
sensitivity information in Cloud
41 Vidyashree B.N HBASE: Hadoop Database 2015
Person detection on tracking 2014
42 Halahravi Keerthi
system
Automatic Segmentation of
Scaling in 2D psoriasis skin
43 Puneeth G J 2014
images using a semi supervised
Algorithm
Performance monitoring in virtual
organization using domain driven
44 Santhanmma 2014
data mining & opinion mining -
IJSER
Security Aanalysis using text ,
45 Nandini C , Ambika S Image and Opas Based 2014
authentication
Feature Based Person tracking
46 Halahravi Keerthi sysstem for Surveillance 2014
Application
Image Processing Approach of
47 Prutha Y M Vehicle Detection For Real Time 2014
Traffic Analysis
Fog computing to protect real &
48 Togarichetti Ashiwini sensitivity information in cloud - 2014
IJECSE
An Energy Efficient Ant-Based

49 Pampapathi B M Routing Algorithm For Wireless 2013
Sensor Networks
An Ad Hoc Networks Protection

50 Nagaraj M using Unobservable Secure On-
Demand Routing Protocol 2013

Detection of Selfish Node in

51 Naveen Kumar B Overlay Network using 2013
Reputation Based Mechanism
Demand based Energy efficient
52 Arun kumar 2013
topology for MANETS- NCMT
Change detection in Synthetic
53 Husna Tabassum Aperture radara images based on 2013
Image Fusion
A New method for Cross
54 Husna Tabassum normalization and multi temporal 2013
visualization
Human Motion detection and
55 Halahravi Keerthi 2013
tracking system
Extracting Summary from
Manjula K S , Sarvar
56 documents using K-Mean 2013
Begum
Clustering Algorithm
Hybrid location based routing
57 Vishwanath Reddy protocol for vehicular adHoc 2013
networks- IJESR
Multi-parameter Summarization
Manjula K S , Sarvar
58 for Software Architecture 2013
Begum
Recovery
Review of active video
59 Wahidha Banu 2013
segmentation
Change Detection in Synthetic
Aperture Radar Images Based on
60 Wahidha Banu 2013
Image Fusion and Fuzzy
Clustering
Exploring The Effect of
Illumination on Automatic
61 Nagaraj M 2012
Expression Recognisation using
ICT-3D
Sravani P , Rashmi K Multicast Authentication Based
62 2012
M on Batch Signature
Geethika H , Vaishnavi Protein Based Memory Using
63 2012
A Bacterio Rhodopsin

CRITERION 5
Faculty Information and Contributions

CRITERION 5 Faculty Information and 200

Contributions
5. FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTIONS
Name of Qualification Designa Date Distribution of teaching Academic research Spon Consu Special
the tion(all of load % sored ltancy ization
faculty designa joinin resea and
member tions g the rch produ
since instit ct
joining ution develo
Degre Un Year the s 1st UG P Facul Ph. Resea pment
e(Sta ive of instituti ye G ty D rch
rting rsit grad ons) ar recei guid paper
from y uati ving ance public
highe on Ph.D ations
st durin
degre inpro Oth g
gram er
e) asses
Prog
emrn
ram t
years
The cumulative information for all the shifts for three assessment years in above format is
provided in Annexure V.
5.1. Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR)
S:F ratio = N/F; N=No. of students= 3x where x is (approved intake + 20% lateral
entry intake+ separate division, if any)
F = No. of faculty = (a + b c) for every assessment year
a: Total number of full-time regular Faculty serving fully to 2nd, 3rd and 4th year of
this program
b: Total number of full-time equivalent regular Faculty(considering fractional load)
serving this program from other Program(s)
c: Total number of full time equivalent regular Faculty(considering fractional load)
of this program serving other program(s)

Regular Faculty means:
Full time on roll with prescribed pay scale. An employee on contract for a period
of not less than two years and drawing consolidated salary not less than
applicable gross salary shall only be counted as a regular employee.
Prescribed pay scales means pay scales notified by the AICTE/Central
Government and implementation as prescribed by the State Government. In
case State Government prescribes lesser consolidated salary for a particular
cadre then same will be considered as reference while counting faculty as a
regular faculty.
Table 5.1: Student-Faculty Ratio
X N F SFR=N/F
Year
CAY(2015-16) 144 3*144=432 28 15.42
CAYm1(2014-15) 144 3*144=432 28 15.42
CAYm2(2013-14) 144 3*144=432 26 16.61
Average SFR for three assessment years 15.81


STUDENT FACULTY RATIO

17
16.5 SFR=N/F
16 SPECIFIED SFR
SFR
15.5
15
14.5
14
CAYm2(2013-2014) CAYm1(2014-2015) CAY(2015-2016)
Fig 5.1: Student Faculty Ratio
5.2. Faculty Cadre Proportion
The reference Faculty cadre proportion is 1(F1):2(F2):6(F3)
F1: Number of Professors required = 1/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 15:1
Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
F2: Number of Associate Professors required = 2/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply
with 15:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
F3: Number of Assistant Professors required = 6/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply
with 15:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1

Table 5.2: Faculty Cadre Proportion
Professors Associate Professors Assistant Professors
Year Required F1 Available Required F2 Available Required F3 Available

CAY(2015-16) 3 1 6 5 19 24
CAYm1(2014-15) 3 1 6 5 19 25
CAYm2(2013-14) 3 1 6 5 19 22
Average RF1=3 AF1=1 RF2=6 AF2=5 RF3=19 AF3=23.666
Cadre Ratio Marks= (AF1/RF1 +AF2 / RF2* 0.6 + AF3/ RF3* 0.4) * 12.5= 16.644456
Faculty Cadre Proportion

20
18 16.7324561 16.99561404
16.20614035
16
14
12
Cadre Marks
10
8
6 Faculty Cadre Proportion
4
2
0
Fig 5.2: Faculty Cadre Proportion

5.3 Faculty Qualification
FQ =2.5 x [(10X +6Y)/F)] where X is no. of regular faculty with Ph.D., Y is no. of regular
faculty with M.Tech, F is no. of regular faculty required to comply 1:15 Faculty Student ratio
(no. of faculty and no. of students required are to be calculated as per 5.1)
Table 5.3: Faculty Qualification
X Y F FQ=2.5 x [(10X +6Y)/F)]
CAY(2015-16) 4 27 29 17.4137931
CAYm1(2014-15) 1 31 29 16.89655172
CAYm2(2013-2014) 1 26 29 14.31034483
Average assessment 16.20689655
Faculty qualification
20
17.4137931 16.89655172
18
16 14.31034483
14
12
Faculty qualification
10
8
6 Faculty qualification
4
2
0
Fig 5.3: Faculty Qualification

5.4 Faculty Retention

No. of regular faculty members in CAY=31 CAYm1=32 CAYm2=27
Table 5.4(a): Faculty Retention

Item Marks CAY(2015-16) CAYm1(2014-15) CAYm2(2013-14)
>=90 % of required
retained during the
period of assessment 20 20 20 20
keeping 2013-14 as
base year
>=75% of required
retained during the
period of assessment 15
keeping 2013-14 as
base year
>=50% of required
retained during the
keeping 2013-14 as
base year
<50 % of required
retained during the
keeping 2013-14 as
base year
Table 5.4(b): Faculty Retention
Number of faculty Retained %
CAY(2015-16) 27 100%
CAYm1(2014-15) 27 100%
CAYm2(2013-14) 27 100%

5.5. Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning
Following are the innovative tools used by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning process:
I. Multimedia Learning Process :
The faculties are using multimedia elements such as Tabs and LCD projectors in the
classroom. It will help the faculties to represent the content in a more meaningful way
using different media elements.
Various multimedia tools used are:
Table 5.5:Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning
Tools Methods Metaphors

Easy to prepare and it can
MS Power Point , Astound be prepared with many of
Graphics and Flash Slide the popular multimedia SLIDE BASED
Show Software elements like graphs,
sound and video
Presentation is created
Macromedia, Flash Author using icons to represent
ICON BASED
ware different media elements
and placed in a flow line.
Presentation is created
Windows Movie Maker,
using moviemaking
Win amp, Macromedia MOVIE BASED
concepts of casts, sounds,
Director
pictures and scores
Easy to prepare and with
word documents if u have
Acrobat Reader 5 with
Adobe Acrobat Reader BOOK BASED
many popular multimedia
elements like graphs sound
and charts
II. Mind Map
Mind Map is another innovative method used by faculties. Mind map is a way of
helping students to make notes that uses only key words and images. They are much
quicker to make and much easier to remember and review because of their visual
quality. Mind Maps are also very quick to review, as it is easy to refresh information
just by glancing once.

III. Role playing and scenario analysis based teaching
Faculties are using role playing and scenario analysis based teaching as another Innovative
method.
5.6. Faculty as participants in Faculty development/training activities/STTPs
A Faculty scores maximum five points for participation
Participation in 2 to 5 days Faculty development program: 3 Points
Participation>5 days Faculty development program: 5 points
Table 5.6: Faculty as participants in Faculty development/training activities/STTPs
Name of the teacher Max 5 per teacher

2013-14 2014-2015 2015-16
Dr.T.Hanumantha Reddy 5
Dr.Girisha.H 5
D.SaiMadhavi 3 5
NageshBabu 5
NagaveniBirader 5
SapnaKulkarni 5 3
Kavitha J 5
D. SwethaRamana 5 3
R.P.Rajeshwari 5
Chidananda 5 3
Aparna.K.S 5 3
Anuradha.S.G 5
Raghu Kumar 5 3
V.Shiv Kumar 5 3
Suresh .K 5
K.M.Shivaprasad 5 3
Vani.N 5
Lingaraj 3 5 3

Afsarbaig 9 5
Sreedevimaalipatil 5
Punith 5
Sampathkumar 5
BergiVeereshGowda 5
Roshan D 5
Nagaraj 5
Naveen Kumar 5
VinuthaPrashanth 5
Sarvar Begum 5
Manjula.K.S 5
Neema.H.M 5
Sum 15 145 24
RT 29 29 29
Assessment=3*Sum/0.5RT(Marks
3.103 15(38.27) 4.96
limited to 15)
Average assessment over three years(Marks limited to 15)= 7.68
5.7. Research and Development
5.7.1. Academic Research
Faculty pursuing Ph.D.:
Table 5.7: Faculty pursuing Ph.D
Faculty name Research USN Universi Guide Date of Number of

topic ty registratio quality
n publicatio
ns in
refereed/S
CI
Journals,
citations,
Books/Boo
k
Chapters
Sai Madhavi Mobile PPCOMPSCI02 RU Dr. Y S Aug 2009 6

D communicat 7 Kurnool Kumarswam

ion through y
graph
theory
Novel Soft
computing Dr.T.
VTU
J.NageshBabu techniques 3VC14PEJ01 Hanumantha Dec 2014 3
Belagavi
for opinion Reddy
mining
SapnaKulkarn Mobile VTU Dr.Yuvaraju
i.B Adhoc 4VV12PEN05 May 2012 7
Belagavi BV
Networks
Federated
Kavitha Juliet Database Dr.AnandaR
10PH0508 JNTUA Aug 2010 4
ao
Systems
Human Dr.T.
VTU
H.Chidananda Activity 3VC11PEN01 Hanumantha Feb 2012 5
Belagavi
Recognition Reddy
Efficient
pattern Dr.T.
Shiva Prasad discovery VTU 4/1 Book
3VC13PEN01 Hanumantha Dec2013
using text Belagavi
Reddy
mining
Optimized
multi
mobile
agent
itinerary VTU Dr.Rajashree
Lingaraj.K 3BR15PEJ05 Feb 2015 8
planning in Belagavi V Biradar
WSN and
its
applications
in ecology
An
approach
for code VTU Dr.Waseem
Afsar Baig 1HK14PJ002 Dec 2014 1
parallelizati Belagavi Ahmed
on in MP-
SoC
Soft
Computing
Techniques
for Dr.T.
Roshan D VTU
Reasoning 3VC16PEJ03 Hanumantha Nov 2015 2
Belagavi
from Reddy
uncertain
data in Big
data

analytics
Cross
Layered
Energy
efficient
wireless Dr.
Shivkumar V VTU
Sensor Rajashree 3
Belagavi
network Biradar
with RF &
solar energy
harvesting.
Highly
Reliable for
Flood
Raghu Kumar forecasting Dr.
VTU
.K.S using Rajashree -
Belagavi
wireless Biradar
Sensor
network.
Faculty contribution towards research:
Table 5.8(a):Faculty contribution towards research
Title of the paper Name of the URL citation DOI

journal/confer ISSN/ISBN
Sl. Faculty
no name ence/conventio number
n/workshop
Static Hand finger RIICTeM-2015

activity recognition
Dr.T using hand shape
Hanuma features to monitor
1 nth elder patients
Reddy intention .
Training tool & ICRASRE-2014

methodology to allow
concurrent
multidisciplinary
experimental projects
in engineering
education.
Altered finger print IJARCET-2015 2278-

enhancement using 1320,Volume
SIFT points 4,Issue 5 ,pp
230-2308
Facial expression ICICSIT-2015

recognition on video
sequence by using
LPP RSVM
Altered finger print IJARCET-2015 2278-

enhancement using 1320,Volume
SIFT points 4,Issue 5 ,pp
230-2308
Hand activity IJHM-2016 Feb 2016

recognition and
classification of hand
involved in the hand
activity
Text Mining:An ICAtCCT-2016 July 21-23 978-1-5090-

Improvised Feature 2399-
Based Model 8/16/$31.00
Approach 2016 IEEE
K-means clustering or ICIIECS-2015 978-1-4673-

document analysis in 8625-8
Indian bilingual
documents
A training Tool and

Methodology to allow
concurrent multi ICRASE-2014
H.Girish June 2014
2 disciplinary
a
experimental projects (conference)
in engineering
education

Image compression IJMER-14 Vol 4 Issue 6

using hybrid wavelet
transform and their FEB -2016
performance
comparison
Hybrid techniques to IOSR-16 Volume

identify faces using 11,Issue 1
key point hypothesis
prediction algorithm
Optimal load and 0975-

10.5120/1077
mobility aware MAC IJCA 0887/973-93-
0/4065
protocol for WSNs 80873-22-4
Intrusion detection
system against
ICCIT-2015 2319-6890
Bandwidth Ddos
attack
Intrusion detection
system against
Bandwidth Ddos Volume
attack IJER-2015 4,Issue Special
5
D.SaiMa
3
dhavi
ISSN:2250-
Database Migration 3005
IJCER-2016
Tool Volume 6
Issue 5
ISSN 2319-
A Hybrid Approach 7064,volume 5
using MACLE to Issue 12, Dec
IJSR
Enhance WSN Energy 2016
Utilization

ISSN 2320-
Challenges of WSN 5407,volume 4
Issue 12, Dec 10.2147/IJAR
faced in Mobility IJAR
2016 01/2481
scenarios
ENB cluster head IJETS-2015 Volume-2,

selection algorithm in Issue-1, and
MANETS January 30,
2015 , ISSN :
2349-3976
The Top-N rule IIJCS-2015 2321-

selection approach 5992,Volume
algorithm to split the 3,issue 1
multimedia traffic
stream into multiple
sub-streams prior to
transmission in
MANETS
Shortest path multicast International ISSN-2347-

tree construction in Journal of 8616, Volume
MANETS Innovation and 4 special issue
Sapna
6 Advancement March
Kulkarni
in computer 2015.
science
(IJIACS),ICET
ES
EBAC Algorithm for Springer

Real-time Traffic science &
Multicasting in Mobile
Business Media
Ad Hoc Networks
Singapore 2016
Security International Issn No : 2349

Enhancements for Journal of 3224,Impact
MANETs with Trust Advancement Factor 3.102
Management using in Engineering

Uncertain Reasoning Technology, June 2016

, Management &
Applied
Science(IJAET
MAS) ,
A Secure and IJIRST ISSN (online):
Collision Free International 2349-6010
Approach of Sensing Journal for
and Forwarding Data Innovative Volume 2
to the Trustworthy Research in Issue 12
Nodes Science & May 2016
Technology
Node connectivity, 2015 IEEE ISBN: 978-1-

Energy and Bandwidth International 4799-8047-\
Aware Clustering Advance
Computing 5/15 ,August
Routing Algorithm for
Conference 2015
Real-time Traffic ,June 12-13,
Multicasting in 2015 B.M.S.
MANET College of
Engineering,
Bangalore,
India , Paper
indexed in
IEEEXplore
Digital
Library, Xplore
Compliant
A comparative IJERT 2014 2278-981
analysis of hand
tracking algorithms for
gestures recognization
The Dynamic Hand IJSRD-2015 2321

Chidana Gesture Recognition 0613,Volume
8 nda H method 3,Issue 4
Static Hand finger RIICTeM-2015

activity recognition
using Hand Shape
features to monitor
elderly patients

intensions
Hand Activity volume III issue

Recognition and 2 of the
classification of hand International
involved in the hand (IJHMI) on 15th
activity June 2015.
Hand Gesture IJSRD-2015 2321

Recognition 0613,Volume
Techniques 3,Issue 3
Morphological Image volume-

Processing Approach
International 2,Issue-5 E-
of Vehicle Detection
Journal of
for Real-Time Traffic ISSN:2347-
Computer
Analysis 2693, pp 88-
Science and
Engineering 92.
(IJCSE), May
2014
volume-3,
International
Morphological Image Issue-5, May
Journal of
Processing Approach
Engineering 2014
of Vehicle Detection
Anuradh for Real-Time Traffic Research & ISSN: 2278-
11 a.S.G Technology 0181, pp 1452-
Analysis
(IJERT), 1456
Video Segmentation
for Moving Object
Detection Using Local ITCSE,
Change and Entropy Computer
ICDIP,ICAIT -
Adaptive Window Science &
Thresholding 2013 pp. 155
Segmentation for Information
166, 2013. DOI :
Moving Object Technology
CS & IT-CSCP 10.5121/csit.2
Detection Using Local (CS & IT) 013.391
Change and Entropy 2013.
Adaptive Window
Thresholding

Fog Computing to
protect real and IJCSE-Dec Volume3,Num
sensitivity information 2014 ber1
in cloud
International volume-3,
Video Segmentation Journal of Issue-5, May-
for Moving Object Computer 2015, ISSN:
Detection & Tracking- Science (IIJCS) 2321-5992, pp
A Review, publication in 36-50.
IPASJ,
Combining Spectral
Volume-3,
And Texture Feature
Issue-10, oct
For Image Segmen IJRIT-2015 2015, pp 62-
tation Using Sensed 72, ISSN
2001-5569.
Images
International
Journal of Volume-8,
Morphological Chan http://dx.dol.or
Signal
ge Detection System No:8, 2015, pp g/10.14257/ijs
Processing, ip.2015.8.8.16
for Real Time Traffic Image 143-150.
Analysis Processing and
Pattern
Recognition
A segmentation
Graphics ,vision
scheme based on & Image ISSN:1687-
uniform LBP and processing 398x volume
Journal
morphological 16 issue 1
approach ICGST
Paper id
Image segmentation Journal of :29566
based on LDP with theoretical &
applied E-ISSN:1817-
morphological
information
treatment 3195 ISSN
technology
1992-8645

Automated face
detection & recog
Page no:140-
nition for detecting
ICACLTS-2016 149 ISBN:978-
impersonation of
93-85818-80-6
candidate in
examination system.
Target segmentation:
GUI for image International
journal of signal
segmentation using
& image
morphological water processing
shed & graphical
March 2016
techniques.
Assisstive clothing
ISSN-2278-
pattern recognition for IJARCCE 10.17148
1021
impaired people
Clothing color and

ISSN : 2319-
pattern recognition for IJECS
7242
impaired people
Automated face
detection &
recognition for
ISSN:2229-
detecting IJSER
5518
impersonation of
candidate in
examination system
Applications of IJCA-2013 ISSN-0975- 10.5120/1273

wireless 8887,Volume 6-9680
communication tools 73,No. 5,July
in managing 2013
construction projects
Lingaraj
12 .K Swarm intelligence ICICSE-2013
based Ant colony
optimization approach
for maximum lifetime
in heterogeneous

WSN
Layered architecture ICNIC-2014

of sensor cloud and its
applications
An evolutionary based IJCATR Volume4,num 10.7753/IJCA

data mining technique ber 1 TR0308.1002
n engineering faculty
evolution using veka
Training tool & ICRASE-2014

methodology to allow
concurrent
multidisciplinary
experimental project
in engineering
A survey on International 10.1109/CICN

Middleware conference .2015.20
challenges and onCICN-2015
approaches for
wireless sensor
networks
A survey on mobile ICATCCT 29-31 october

agent middleware 2015
design principles and
itinerary planning
algorithms
Text Mining:An ICAtCCT-2016 July 21-23 978-1-5090-

Improvised Feature 2399-
Based Model 8/16/$31.00
Approach 2016 IEEE
Andriod based Movig IEAE 2016 Volume 1 issue

Shiva
Object detection with 1 July 2016
13 Prasad
alert SMS with Image
KM
Streamig
K-means clustering or ICIIECS-2015 978-1-4673-

document analysis in 8625-8
Indian bilingual
documents

Table 5.8(b) Details of books published
Faculty Name Title of the Book Name of the Year of publication
publisher
Shiva Prasad K.M Programming with C and Invincible Publishers Jan 2017
Data Structures
Ph.D. guiding:
Table 5.9: Details of Ph.D guiding
Faculty name Research scholars Research topic University/Year

Human Activity
H.Chidananda VTU,Belagavi,2012
Recognition
Face recognition
Mahesh U Nagaral VTU,Belagavi,2012
using soft computing
Novel Soft
computing
J.NageshBabu VTU,Belagavi,2014
techniques for
Dr.T. Hanumantha opinion mining
Reddy Efficient pattern
Shiva Prasad discovery using text VTU,Belagavi,2013
mining
Soft Computing
Techniques for
Roshan D Reasoning from VTU,Belagavi,2015
uncertain data in Big
data analytics
Ph.D. Awarded:
Table 5.10: Ph.D Awarded during 2015-2016
Faculty name Year of completion Guide Research topic

Multi-view face
Dr.H.Girisha 2015 Dr.K.Karibasappa
authentication
Table 5.11: Ph.D Awarded during 2016-2017
Faculty name Year of completion Guide Research topic

Segmentation of
Dr.K.Karibasappa &
Dr.Anuradha.S.G Dec 2016 images using local
Dr.B.Eswara Reddy
and region features

5.7.3 Development activities
Product Development
The following products/projects have been developed at the Research centre:
Table 5.12: Details of Product Development at Research Centre:
2015-2016:
Name of the
Sl.no USN Title Guide
student
3VC12CS064 Priyanka.Y
3VC12CS076 Shalini.C
3VC12CS006 Akshitha.K Industry and commerce
1 Puneeth. G.J
assent commune (icac)
Ayesha shaik
3VC12CS013
afsheen
3VC12CS072 Sahana.S
3VC12CS078 Shanthi.K Single window solution for
2 Dr.GIRISHA H
3VC12CS090 Sushma.M industry
3VC12CS068 Ramya.A
Syed Yakub
3VC12CS093
Hussain Suresh k
Ashfaq ur
3 3VC12CS108 E-tax exemption
Rehman
3VC12CS104 Vinod.H
3VC12CS082 Shivaram.A
3VC12CS085 Soumyashree
Android and Bluetooth Based
4 3VC12CS070 Rizwana
Voice Controlled Wireless Kavitha.J
K.Sanjana
3VC12CS074 Smart Home System
Choudary
5 3VC12CS069 Ramyashree.G.R
Cell phone operated mobile
3VC12CS092 Shwetha.T.S Sarvar Begum
bug using microcontroller
3VC12CS101 Vasanthi.K
2014-2015:
Name of the
student
3VC11CS100 Shree Durga.M
3VC11CS028 HarithaYadav.J
3VC11CS103 Swetha Shree Automated Examination
1 Sapna Kulkarni
Soumya Paper Evaluating System
3VC11CS099 RajKumari

3VC11CS064 P Pratyusha
Prisoners Face Detecting
2 3VC11CS033 K Sofiya S.G.Anuradha
System.
3VC111CS49 Megha
3VC11CS021 Dikshitha D.V
3VC11CS065 Sushma R
RYMEC CSE Trivia Crack B. Naveen
3 3VC11CS075 Roja M.G Your Mind(Portal) Kumar
3VC12CS511 Swaroop C.K
2013-2014:
Name of the
student
3VC11CS404 GoturShobha
3VC11CS410 Rashmi.M
1 Online Examination
3VC11CS408 Rajeshwari.G D. SaiMadhavi
System For Android
VidyashreeSakri
3VC11CS420
3VC10CS025 Deepika.S College Staff
3VC10CS001 A.Jayashree Reddy Administration System
2 S.G Anuradha.
And Salary
3VC10CS019 Bhagyashree.S Management System
3VC10CS074 Rupesh.M
S.Nageshwara Department
3 3VC10CS076
Reddy Information System Aparna.K.S
3VC10CS030 Gautham Naidu (KNOWSOFT)
3VC11CS402 Dilip Kumar
3VC11CS403 GirijaSri.M
4 3VC11CS400 Anjali.J College Result Analysis
D. Sai Madhavi
3VC11CS419 Vidyashree.B.N For Android
3VC11CS414 ShaikAnjum
Research laboratories
The following list of licensed softwares is available at the Research centre:
Table 5.13: List of Licensed Software at Research Centre
SI. Date Of Remarks

Specification/ Particulars of the Item Obsolete/
No. Purchase
expired
Borland C++4.5 for DOS,
1 16/03/1996 working
windows CD & F3 Media

Microsoft Visual Studio 97

2 06/10/1996 Enterprise Edition + MS Mastering working
Visual Basic AE, CD Media
Oracle Workgroup Server 10 users
3 08/12/1996 working
CD ROM Media
4 19/03/1997 M TAB Lath & Mill under use
5 25/06/1998 Windows NT Server 4.0 CD Media working
6 07/08/2000 MIPOWER Software package Under use
7 08/07/2000 RedHat Linux 7.0 working
8 19/02/2001 Solid Edge V9 Not in Use
9 14/12/2001 Cadem (Caps Turn & Caps Mill) Under Use
10 09/02/2002 Robo Cell (Simulation Software) Under Use
FPGA Advantage software 6.3V
11 26/04/2003 5 years once
1CD (5 user lic)
12 26/04/2003 IEEE std for Verilog HDL(CD) Life time
13 28/04/2003 1. MATLAB Ver(6.5) Life time
14 15/04/2004 1. MultiSim Education (ver-7) Life time
15 24/04/2004 FPGA-Advantage 6.2 (5user lic) 5 years
Norton Antivirus Coporate Edition
16 17/06/2004 working
2004 (Version9.0) Licenses for 10 Users
17 08/11/2004 Matlab Ver 7 Single user Life time
18 17/09/2004 Network Simulator for 10 user licences working
Universal FPGA Development
19 20/09/2004 Lifetime
station with 50K gates
20 23/09/2004 ANSYS 10.1 Under use
Visual Studio.Net Pro 2003 Win32
21 27/09/2004 working
English edn.
22 27/09/2004 MSDN Library CDs with Alliance 7.0 working
SQL Server 2000 STD English and
23 27/09/2004 working
Document Kit
24 27/09/2004 Office 2003 Stand Edn. English working
Windows 2003 Sever Enterprise
25 27/09/2004 working
English 10 User License

Oracle 9i on Windows 2000 server

26 28/09/2004 working
05 users media licenses
27 14/03/2005 SUSE Linux professionals 9.2V Life time
28 04/04/2005 5)IC Flow ver 2004.3 (5 user lic) 5 years once
29 06/06/2005 Red Hat Enterprise Ver 3 standard Life time
.DIGILENT XUP VIRTEX-II
30 13/12/2005 Life time
PRO Development System
31 21/12/2005 1. XILINX ISE softwaie Life time
32 01/09/2006 Solid Edeg V 19 under use
C Compiler Software package for
33 05/01/2006 Life time
8051 Microcontroller (10 User Licence)
34 03/01/2007 Windows Vista working
35 03/01/2007 Office 2007 working
36 03/01/2007 Visual Studio 2005 working
Visual Studio pro all Languages
37 03/01/2007 working
licenses for 200 users
38 17/03/2007 Campus Agreement Licenses for 200 Users working
39 05/10/2007 Auto Plater Ver 5.6 Life time
40 08/07/2007 MATLAB Software pack working
41 22/08/2007 Windows XP personal Edition working
42 02/02/2008 SPI C Compiler SC 51 + 9 users Under use
43 05/07/2008 Auto CAD 2009 educational version Life time
until new
44
02/02/2010 MS Operating System(2007) 200 users version
until new
45
02/02/2010 MS Office 2007 (100 Users) version
46 02/02/2010 SQL Server (1) 34,605
47 02/02/2010 SQL CAL (1O) 232*200=46,400
until new
48
02/02/2010 Oracle 11g (25) version
49 18/06/2014 Office Professional Plus 2013 (100 qty)
Exchange Server Std. CAL-Device CAL
50
18/06/2014 2013(100 qty) Lifetime -
Lync Server Standard - Device CAL 2013 (100 upgraded
51
18/06/2014 qty)
Sharepoint server std. CAL-Device Cal 2013 (100
52
18/06/2014 qty)

53 System center configuration manager client ML

18/06/2014 2102 R2 (100 qty)
System center endpoint protection 2012 R2(100
54
18/06/2014 qty)
55 18/06/2014 windows server - device CAL 2102 (100 qty)
56 18/06/2014 windows server -standard 2012 R2 (1 qty)
57 18/06/2014 windows 8.1 Enterprise (100 qty)
List of open Source Software:
Table 5.14: List of Open Source Software
Sl No. Open Source Software description

1. Turbo C/C++
2. .Net Framework
3. JDK 6/7/8
4. Eclipse IDE
5. XAMPP
6. Adobe reader
7. Jcreator
5.8. Faculty Performance Appraisal and Development System (FPADS)
Faculty Performance Appraisal letter is collected from each faculty in which they need to
show their innovations and research for their self renewal to cope up with changes in
technology and develop expertise for effective implementation of curricula. The format of
Faculty Performance Appraisal letter is provided in annexure V.
5.9 Visiting/Adjunct/Emeritus Faculty etc.
Table 5.15: List of Visiting Faculty during 2013-2015
Name of Visiting Number of contact hours

Designation
Faculty 2015-16

2013-14 2014-15
Solution Architect,
Image Processing,
Mr.Apurba Das Embedded Innovation 15 15 15
Lab at Tata Consultancy
Services, Bengaluru
Sr.Trainer, RIIT,
Charles Antony Mysore 10 10 -
Retired English
Dr.Satyanarayana Professor 6
10 5
Dr.Mohammad Assoc.Prof, King Faisal

University -
Imran Khan 5 5
Industry Academic
Srinivas Ramanujam Head ,TCS, Bengaluru -
10 15
L KhajaMoinuddin ALIZA consultancy - - 5

Mysore University,
Dr. H S Guru Mysore - - 10

CRITERION 6
Facilities and Technical support

CRITERION 6 Facilities and technical support 80
6. Facilities and technical support

6.1 Adequate and well equipped laboratories, and technical man power
Table 6.1: ODD SEMESTER (2013-14)
Sl. Name of the No. of Name of the Weekly Technical man power support
No laboratory students important utilizatio Name of the Designation qualifi
per setup equipment n status technical cation
(batch (all the staff
size) courses
for
which
the lab is
utilized)
1 Computer
Systems
Computer CCP Lab N. B.E.
30 Specification Instructor
Center 5 45% Mallikarjuna (ECE)
enclosed
below
2 Computer
Systems Diplo
Computer WP Lab Maligi Asst.
20 Specification ma
Center 4 35% Nagaraj Instructor
enclosed CSE
below
3 Computer
Systems and
EC & LD Diplo
Computer hardware Maligi Asst.
21 Lab ma
Center 3 components Nagaraj Instructor
35% CSE
Specification
enclosed below
4 Computer
Computer Systems Diplo
DS Lab Maligi Asst.
Center 2 20 Specification ma
35% Nagaraj Instructor
(Right Wing) enclosed CSE
below
5 Computer
Computer Systems Network Diplo
Maligi Asst.
Center 2 20 Specification Lab ma
Nagaraj Instructor
(Left Wing) enclosed 35% CSE
below
6
Computer
SS Lab
Computer Systems
and OS N. B.E.
Center 1 20 Specification Instructor
Lab Mallikarjuna (ECE)
(Left Wing) enclosed
35%
below
7 Computer 20 Computer DBMS N. Instructor B.E.

Center 1 Systems Lab Mallikarjuna (ECE)

(Right Wing) Specification 35%
enclosed
below
Table 6.2: EVEN SEMESTER (2013-14)
Sl. Name of No. of Name of the Weekly Technical man power support
No the students important utilization Name of the Designation Qualificatio
laborator per setup equipment status (all technical staff n
y (batch the
size) courses for
which the
lab is
utilized)
Computer
Systems
Computer CCP Lab N.
1 30 Specification Instructor B.E. (ECE)
Center 5 40% Mallikarjuna
enclosed
below
Computer Research
Systems Lab
Computer Asst. Diploma
2 20 Specification /Project Maligi Nagaraj
Center 4 Instructor CSE
enclosed Work
below 30%
Computer
Systems and ICS and
Computer hardware microproce Asst. Diploma
3 21 Maligi Nagaraj
Center 3 components ssor Lab Instructor CSE
Specification 35%
enclosed below
Computer
Computer
Systems Algorithm
Center 2 Asst. Diploma
4 20 Specification Lab Maligi Nagaraj
(Right Instructor CSE
enclosed 35%
Wing)
below
Computer
Computer
Systems Algorithm
Center 2 Asst. Diploma
5 20 Specification Lab Maligi Nagaraj
(Left Instructor CSE
enclosed (6/12 Slots)
Wing)
below
Computer
Computer
Systems
Center 1 USP Lab Asst. Diploma
6 20 Specification Maligi Nagaraj
(Left 35% Instructor CSE
enclosed
Wing)
below
Computer
Computer
Systems
Center 1 CG Lab N.
7 20 Specification Instructor B.E. (ECE)
(Right 35% Mallikarjuna
enclosed
Wing)
below

No the students important utilization Name of Designatio qualificatio
laborato per setup equipment status (all the n n
ry (batch the courses technical
size) for which staff
the lab is
utilized)
Computer
Systems N.
Computer 30 CCP Lab
1 Specificatio Mallikarj Instructor B.E. (ECE)
Center 5 45%
n enclosed una
below
Computer
Systems
Computer 20 WP Lab Maligi Assistant Diploma
2 Specificatio
Center 4 40% Nagaraj Instructor CSE
n enclosed
below
Computer
Systems and
hardware EC & LD
Computer 21 Maligi Assistant Diploma
3 components Lab
Center 3 Nagaraj Instructor CSE
Specificatio 35%
n enclosed
below
Computer
Computer
Systems
Center 2 DS Lab Maligi Assistant Diploma
4 20 Specificatio
(Right 35% Nagaraj Instructor CSE
n enclosed
Wing)
below
Computer
Computer
Systems
Center 2 Network Lab Maligi Assistant Diploma
5 20 Specificatio
(Left 35% Nagaraj Instructor CSE
n enclosed
Wing)
below
Computer
Computer
Systems SS Lab and N.
Center 1
6 20 Specificatio OS Lab Mallikarj Instructor B.E. (ECE)
(Left
n enclosed 35% una
Wing)
below
Computer
Computer
Systems N.
Center 1 DBMS Lab
7 20 Specificatio Mallikarj Instructor B.E. (ECE)
(Right 35%
n enclosed una
Wing)
below

SL Name of No. of Name of the Weekly Technical man power support

. the students important utilization Name of Designation Qualification
No laborator per equipment status (all the
y setup the technical
(batch courses staff
size) for which
the lab is
utilized)
Computer
Systems CCP Lab N.
Computer
1 30 Specification 45% Mallikarju Instructor B.E. (ECE)
Center 5
enclosed na
below
Computer Research
Systems Lab
Computer Maligi Assistant
2 20 Specification /Project Diploma CSE
Center 4 Nagaraj Instructor
enclosed Work
below 30%
Computer
Systems and
ICS and
hardware
Computer 21 microproc Maligi Assistant
3 components Diploma CSE
Center 3 essor Lab Nagaraj Instructor
Specification
35%
enclosed
below
Computer
Computer
Systems N.
Center 2 Unix Lab
4 20 Specification Mallikarju Instructor B.E. (ECE)
(Right 35%
enclosed na
Wing)
below
Computer
Computer
Systems
Center 2 20 DAA Lab Maligi Assistant
5 Specification Diploma CSE
(Left 35% Nagaraj Instructor
enclosed
Wing)
below
Computer
Computer
Systems N.
Center 1 USP Lab
(Left 35%
enclosed na
Wing)
below
Computer
Computer
Systems N.
Center 1 CG Lab
(Right 35%
enclosed na
Wing)
below

No the student important utilization Name of Designation qualificatio
laborator s per equipment status (all the the n
y setup courses for technical
(batch which the lab staff
size) is utilized)
Computer Computer SS Lab and OS
N.
Center 1 Systems Lab
1 20 Mallikarj Instructor B.E. (ECE)
(Left Specification 45%
una
Wing) enclosed below Utilization
Computer Computer
DBMS Lab
Center 1 Systems Maligi Assistant Diploma
2 20 35%
(Right Specification Nagaraj Instructor CSE
Utilization
Wing) enclosed below
Computer Computer
DS Lab N.
Center 2 Systems
3 20 35% Mallikarj Instructor B.E. (ECE)
(Right Specification
Utilization una
Computer Computer
Network Lab
Center 2 Systems Shivaraj
4 20 35% Programmer MCA
(Left Specification P.
Utilization
Computer
Systems and
EC & LD Lab
Computer hardware Shivaraj
Center 3 components P.
Utilization
Specification
enclosed below
Computer
WP Lab
Computer Systems Maligi Assistant Diploma
6 20 40%
Center 4 Specification Nagaraj Instructor CSE
Utilization
enclosed below
Computer
CCP Lab B.
Computer 30 Systems
7 45% Mallikarj Programmer MCA
Center 5 Specification
Utilization una
enclosed below

size) is utilized)
Computer
CCP Lab N.
Computer Systems
1 30 45% Mallikarj Instructor B.E. (ECE)
una
enclosed below
Computer
Research Lab
2 20 /Project Work
40%
enclosed below
Computer
ICS and
Systems and
microprocessor
Computer 21 hardware Shivaraj
3 Lab Programmer MCA
35%
Specification
enclosed below
Computer Computer Unix Lab /
B.
Center 2 Systems Seminar /
4 20 Mallikarj Programmer MCA
(Right Specification Project work
una
Wing) enclosed below 35%
Computer Computer
Center 2 20 Systems DAA Lab Maligi Assistant Diploma
5
(Left Specification 35% Nagaraj Instructor CSE
Computer Computer
Center 1 Systems USP Lab Shivaraj
6 20 Programmer MCA
(Left Specification 35% P.
Computer Computer
B.
Center 1 Systems CG Lab
(Right Specification 35%
una
Computer
N.
Computer Systems
8 20 M-Tech Lab Mallikarj Instructor B.E. (ECE)
Centre 6 Specification
una
enclosed below

size) is utilized)
Computer Computer SS Lab and OS
Center 1 Systems Lab Maligi Assistant Diploma
1 20
(Left Specification 35% Nagaraj Instructor CSE
Computer Computer DBMS Lab
Center 1 Systems (6/12 Slots) Maligi Assistant Diploma
2 20
(Right Specification 35% Nagaraj Instructor CSE
Computer Computer DS Lab
B.
Center 2 Systems (6/12 slots)
(Right Specification 35%
una
Computer Computer
Network Lab B.
Center 2 Systems
4 20 35% Mallikarj Programmer MCA
(Left Specification
Utilization una
Computer
Systems and
EC & LD Lab
Computer hardware Shivaraj
Utilization
Specification
enclosed below
Computer
WP Lab
6 20 40%
Utilization
enclosed below
Computer
CCP Lab
Computer 30 Systems Shivaraj
7 45% Programmer MCA
Center 5 Specification P.
Utilization
enclosed below
Computer
B.
Computer Systems
8 20 M-Tech Lab Mallikarj Programmer MCA
una
enclosed below
Computer
Supporting Lab
9 20 30%
Utilization
enclosed below
Computer
Supporting Lab
Computer Systems Shivaraj
Center 8 Specification P.
Utilization
enclosed below

Computer
Supporting Lab B.
Computer Systems
11 20 30% Mallikarj Programmer MCA
Utilization una
enclosed below

6.2. Additional facilities created for improving the quality of learning
experience in laboratories
6.2.1 Additional facility created in laboratories
Table 6.8: Additional facility created in laboratories
Sl. Facility name Details Reason(s) for Utilization Areas in Relevance

No creating which to POs
facilities students are
expected to
have
enhanced
learning
Web
Self learning /
Programming/
Seminars / Up to
Software PO5 /
1 Internet Facility 10Mbps Presentations / 40GB
engineering/ PO12
Solve Per month
Computer
assignments
Networks
Compaq Presario-
2200 Laptop,
intel celeron1.4
Ghz, 30 GB
HDD, 256 MB
Laptop and Presentation /
2 RAM To demonstrate As Needed PO5
projector Seminars
And
Sony projector
DX140, 3200
Lukmens, VGA
Cable
Before and Know their
Each staff is To Counsel and
after the weaknesses
3 Proctor System assigned a set of to motivate PO12
internal and strengths
15 students students
tests and improve
To enhance
student Curriculum
EDUSAT Technical videos Free lab
4 knowledge / specified PO5/PO12
training by experts batch
Exposures to subjects
various experts
Subjects
Tutorial Conducted for To improve
5 As Needed opted by PO12
Classes Weak students Weak Students
students
VTU Specified, Additional Curriculum
Department
6 Program Specific support for As Needed specified PO12
Library
text books and students not subjects

reference under Book-

books(160) Bank scheme
7 Dell Tabs / 3
Sony projector
Tabs (2014-Till Presentation /
7 DX140, 3200 To demonstrate As Needed PO5
Date) Seminars
Lukmens, VGA
Cable
Books,
Technical
Books,
Links
Journals,
192.168.8.4:8080
Digital library Previous year
192.168.8.4/gdlc1 PO5/
8 (2014- Till Question As Needed
192.168.8.4/gdlc2 PO12
Date) papers,
192.168.8.4/gdlc3
Presentations,
192.168.8.4/nptel
Video Lectures,
Access to IEEE
Explore
Web
Self learning /
Programming/
Seminars / Up to
Software PO5 /
9 WiFi Presentations / 40GB
engineering/ PO12
Solve Per month
Computer
assignments
Networks
Table 6.9 PO / PSO Justification for additional facilities provided in the laboratories
PO / Justification
PSO
PO5 Students will be able to get acquainted with the modern tools
PO10 Communication Lab will help Students to Communicate effectively on
complex engineering activity with engineering community and with society at
large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and
design documentation, make effective presentations, and receive clear
instructions
PO12 Internet / WiFi facility will help students to have the preparation and ability to
engage in independent learning and provide a means to create awareness of
the cutting edge technologies.
6.2.2 Digital Library
Availability of digital library content:
If available, mention number of courses etc. : 10
Availability of an exclusive server : Yes

Availability over Intranet/Internet : Yes
Availability of exclusive space/room : Yes
Number of users per login session : 20
6.2.3 Internet
Table 6.10: Internet service provider details

Name of the Internet provider BSNL & Airtel
Available bandwidth 10Mbps
Access speed per user 2Mbps
Availability of Internet as an exclusive lab Yes
Availability in most computing lab Yes
Availability in Departments and other units Yes
Availability in Faculty rooms Yes
Availability of WiFi Yes
WiFi Provider Airtel
Wifi Bandwidth 10 Mbps (Unlimited)

6.3. Laboratories: maintenance and overall ambiance
6.3.1 Academic Infrastructure & Facilities Maintenance details
Table 6.11: Academic Infrastructure & Facilities Maintenance details

Infrastructure &
Maintenance Description
Facility
Well furnished laboratories are cleaned by internal sweepers every
day. A lab instructor looks after the maintenance of each laboratory.
Laboratories They put together propose the budget for the required consumables,
new equipment, repairs and calibration if required. They also
maintain lab manuals and lab journals.
Seminar hall of the department is maintained by lab instructors at

Seminar Halls
regular intervals.
Tutorial Rooms Tutorial rooms are cleaned every day by internal sweepers.
Lab instructors maintain the ledger book for equipment of the
Equipment laboratory. They prepare the preventive maintenance schedules and
maintain as per the schedules.
A programmer / lab instructors of each computer laboratory are
responsible for maintenance of systems and software. Programmer
Computers carryout maintenance of each computer at regular intervals.
Annual maintenance contract (AMC) given at cost of 150 rupees per
system.
Faculty members of departments can borrow books from
Department Library Department Library and students in their free time can make use of
the books available in the Department Library. One Faculty member

is in-charge of the Department Library.
Internet related matters are maintained by a team of instructors and
Internet /Intranet programmers. They maintain the daily band width, usage, band
width allocation, sharing etc.
Two technicians and one attender look after the maintenance of

Electricity
electricity.
6.3.2 Ambience of the work places:
Our Department has sufficient number of laboratories that are fully ventilated and
provided with necessary concealed electrical wiring and Electrical items like fans,
ACs, lights, tabs, Projectors, computer systems with internet connectivity, printers,
scanners etc.
Faculty members are provided with cabins with all the necessary facilities (Like
intercom, furniture, desktop System, Printers etc., )
6.3.3 Cleanliness:
Cleanliness is maintained in the Department by disposing all the waste material on a
daily basis with the help of sufficient man-power.
Maintenance: 5 attenders and 4 maintenance workers maintain the regular cleaning &
maintaining job.

6.4. Project laboratories
Table 6.12: Facilities Provided in Project Laboratory
Sl no Facility
1 Special lab (Center 4) with systems is provided for carrying out project work.
Every project batch has been allotted with guide in order to pursue with their
2
project work.
Licensed softwares and softwares downloaded from open source are provided to
3
students according to their requirements.
4 Training programs are conducted to initiate their project work.
5 Network and internet facilities are provided to students.
Digital library facility with access to IEEE explorer has been extended to the
6
students.
Instructors will assist students to setup their systems/ laptops to start their project
7
work.
Sponsored Projects
1 Guidance given to students to apply for the Government sponsored projects like
KSCST
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between CSE RYMEC & DIC

2 Established. And students are promoted and guided to work on live projects to
solve problems of common man.

3 Live projects sanctioned for the benefit of students.
4 EDC Cell is formed to encourage students to apply for live projects
5 Awareness program / Seminar to specify about procedure, guidelines to apply for

KSCST / IBM Projects, conducted by project coordinator.
Project Exhibitions
1 Project guides and project coordinators constantly encourage students to participate

in project exhibitions like SHRUSTI

6.5. Safety measures in laboratories
6.5.1 Safety Norms and Checks
Checks for wiring and electrical installations for leakage and ear thing
The safety of electrical equipments is taken care by properly selecting the Conductor
size (Wire size) so that the wire will withstand during short Circuits and unbalances.
The safety of equipment and wires are provided by MCB and ELCB. MCB provides
protection during short circuits. Fuses provide protection from over currents. Every
piece of equipment is provided with proper ear thing so that it will be provide
protection from internal faults.
6.5.1.1 Ear thing & Earth pits
As the college has a multi-block academic ambience precautions have been taken for
proper ear thing. All the major pieces of equipment are provided with proper ear thing
materials. Required amount of charcoal, salt, and earthling rods are made available to the
personnel.
We are testing all the ear things periodically and strengthening each ear thing by
adding needed salt, coals, red soil & sand. Loosen nut & bolt by tightening as per norms.
Table 6.13: Observation Report for Earth pits Year 2013-14(1st Aug 2013-30th July 2014)
Sl. No. of Earth pits

Date Remarks/Observations
No Checked
1 20-09-2013 10 Nos Filling 3kg salt, red soil and coal
Note: Regular watering every month

Table 6.14: Observation Report for Earth pits Year 2014-15 (1st Aug 2014-30th July 2015)
No. of Earth pits

Sl. No. Date Remarks / Observations
Checked
Note: Regular watering every month.
No. of Earth pits

Checked
No. of Earth pits

Checked

6.5.2 Firefighting measurements
All the academic floors have two or more entrances / exits. Fire fighting is very
essential where students gatherings are large. Labs are the places where large number
of students work with equipment carrying considerable amount of current and having
voltages.
To avoid damage to the equipment and to the furniture and students firefighting
equipment should be placed at all the places where large gatherings are expected.
These will help in saving lives, property from fire. To do fire fighting generally fire
fighting cylinders containing powder mixtures to emit CO2 to extinguish fire. These
are available in different sizes.
In case of large fire, multiple exits should be designed to the buildings and places so
that immediate evacuation is required.
Table 6.17: Details of firefighting equipment provided by CSE department
Type and size of the equipment ABC 6KG/4KG Fire Extinguishers
No of pieces of equipment 5
ABC 6 kgs - Rs. 2450 ( per equipment)

Cost of the equipment
ABC 4 kgs- Rs. 2250 ( per equipment)
The placement of the equipment All laboratories
6.5.3. Safety of civil structure
The college takes all the precautions before it goes for constructing a building. The
following measures get meticulously executed before, during and after construction.
6.5.3.1 Processes of Construction
The plans are developed by eminent engineers.

Necessary approvals are obtained by relevant government bodies
Full-time engineers work on the construction site.
The progress of constructions is reviewed both by college administration and the
management representatives on a regular scale.
6.5.3.2 Safety management of civil structures
The college accords prime importance to safety during constructions.
The flooring is monitored on a periodic basis.
The ceiling is monitored; care is taken in order to see that there would be no
leakages & maintained regularly.
Window frames are checked and painted whenever necessary.
Buildings are white washed on a periodic basis.
Doors are protected from white ants and painted on a periodic basis.
Roofs of the buildings are maintained and steps are taken to prevent seepage.
Proper drainage system is provided to prevent water logging.
6.5.4 System and Data security measures taken in the department
Students are restricted from carrying pen drives, CDs or any other storage devices into
the laboratories to avoid data misuse and prevent systems from virus attacks.
Students are restricted from carrying cell phones or any other electronic gadgets to
prevent any sort of distraction.
CC cameras are placed in each laboratories and corridors to monitor students and
prevent them from doing any hazardous activity or theft.
6.5.5 Availability of first-aid unit
We have First aid boxes in the department as a precautionary measure to treat any injuries.
And in case of emergency; the clinic with a qualified doctor is available in the campus.

CRITERION 7

CRITERION 7 Continuous Improvement 50
7. Continuous Improvement
7.1. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the POs
The Rao Bahadur Y Mahabaleswarappa Engineering College, Ballari is affiliated to Visvesvaraya

Technological University, Belagavi. The courses undergo syllabus revision every four years. The institute
collects inputs from various stakeholders and the curriculum gap are identified. The institute works closely with
stakeholders which mainly includes academicians, industry people, training institutes and alumni to finalize needs of
the students. Computer science and Engineering curriculum includes both core and electives theory subjects and
practical courses.
Components of curriculum
Professional Core Elective Practicals Applied science Total No of
and humanities courses
35 (57 %) 05 (08 %) 15 (24 %) 07 (11 %) 62
Each course is mapped with program outcomes and combined with course outcomes to find the curriculum gaps. The
summarised data is evaluated and associated actions were presented, discussed and approved by PAC and DAC.
Based on the gaps, value added programs are arranged to bridge the knowledge gap between academia and
industry and to strengthen the regular academic programmes prescribed by the University. The identified gaps
for 2010 scheme curriculum are specified in SAR section 2.1.1.2, Page No.64.
In the year 2015 the university introduced choice based credit system (CBCS) for curriculum.
After identifying the areas of weakness in the program based on the analysis & evaluation of POs and PSOs
attainment levels, measures identified and implemented to improve POs and PSOs attainment levels for the
2015 16 assessment year shown below.
. POS Target level Attainment Level Observation

Enginee
Engineering is the application of mathematics and

Knowle
2.44 2.21
PO1
ring
dge
scientific, economic, social, and practical knowledge in

order to invent, innovate, design, build, maintain, research
Actions:
1. Conducting theory classes for university curriculum.
2. Identifying the weak and bright students.
3. Conducting tutorial class and remedial classes for weak students.
4. Mentoring system is in place for giving guidance to students

Problem Analysis
The goal of problem analysis is to gain a better
understanding, before solution development begins. To
2.40 2.17 identify the root cause, or the problem behind the problem,
PO2
collect the inputs from stakeholders. Students are required

to understand the real-world problems and user's needs and
propose solutions accordingly.
Actions:
1. Problem based learning introduced.
2. Preparation of project requirement specifications reports.
3. Allowing students to do projects.
An engineering approach to product development. Product
Development
of Solutions
Design /
development is the process of creating a new product to be

2.42 2.21
PO3
sold by a business or enterprise to its customers.

Courses like SE,ECS, DAA and others provides the process
of solution development.
Actions:
1. Allowing students to visit industries and discussing the design issues.
2. Conducting workshop from industry experts.
3. Conducting research / innovation awareness program among students and faculties.
investigations of
Research in requirements engineering and human computer

Conducting
problems
complex
interaction has challenged the proponents of formal

2.35 2.08
PO4
methods.
Wireless networks, computer security are very key areas of
complex problems.
Actions:
1. Conducting workshops and seminars.
2. Problem based learning
3. Conducting workshop on Internet of Things.
4. creative work undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase knowledge and skills
5. Digital library access extended to all the students in campus and outside the campus.
6. Internet facilities.
Ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern
Modern tool
engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.

2.57 2.36
usage
PO5
Modern Tool Usage to solve Engineering Problems.

Awareness on usage of the such tools has become
necessity.
Actions:
1. New software tools like MAT-LAB procured for image processing projects
2. NCTUNS, network simulators are used for network project and for practical.
3. Tools are used correctly and in a consistent way with the stated objectives
The engineer
and society
Students need to be understood the roles & responsibilities

2.13 2.06
PO6
in their working organization but also towards the society.

And serve the society by developing better solutions for
exiting problems.
Actions:
1. Workshops/Seminars on societal engineering.
2. Real-Time projects for societal problems.

Environmen
sustainabilit
Using the power of computing to process large quantities of
data, information dissemination, decision making
t and
2.01
PO7
1.92
y
algorithms, resource allocation based on real-time
information and other process to be made sustainable
Actions:
1. Adoption of technology to go paperless for information dissemination
2.47
Ethics
2.32 The impact our ethics curricula have on students seems

PO8
marginal at best and qualitative inadequacy.

Actions:
1. Study of moral, legal, and social issues involving cyber-technology.

2. Make the student commitment to apply their knowledge of ethics to the respective workplace environment.
student are
Individual
and team
2.66 2.51
work
1. Poor in analyzing case studies individually.

PO9
2. Poor in properly mapping projects to the right

architecture
Actions:
1. More practical problems are to be given to individual students to enhance the analytical skills
2. Project guides help them to aware merits of architecture and they can select the feasible architecture
for their projects.
3. Practical approach of teaching to be adopted.
4. More group activities like quiz, group discussions are encouraged.
Commun
students are weak in communication, group discussion,

ication
PO10
2.65 2.54
managerial skills ,time management and taking dynamic
discussions
Actions:
1. Seminars to be given for students.
2. Group discussion on technical and general topics.
3. Presentations.
4. Technical quizzes to be conducted.
managemen
and finance
Students should know project management is the discipline

Project
PO11
2.06 2.01 of initiating, planning, executing, controlling, closing the

t
work of a team, and cost estimating, cost management to

achieve specific goals and meet specific success criteria
Actions:
1. Ask the students to submit the requirement specification.
2. Gantt chart submission.
3. Use of Cocomo model for cost estimation of project deployment.
Learning activity undertaken throughout life, with the aim
Life-long
learning
of improving knowledge, skills and competences within a

PO12
2.17 1.94
personal, civic, social and/or employment-related
perspective".
Actions:
1. Students are guided by mentors set goals and task-related strategies.
2. Teach students about their learning styles and learning strategies.
3. Ask students to conduct both self and peer assessments.
4. Student-centered pedagogies (e.g. cooperative learning, PBL, team-based learning) that help develop
self reliance and interdependence.

NETWORK
PSOS Attainment level and Actions for improvement (2015-16)
The focus is on the learning of students projects..

PSO1
2.44 2.17
ING
Actions:
1. Problem based learning
2. Giving case studies.
3. Mini projects on networking and usage of tools.
4. Set-up of Internet of Things laboratory for experimentation of network models.
The focus is on the learning of students projects...
ENGINEERING
SOFTWARE
PSO2
2.39 2.20
Actions:
1. Problem based learning.
2. Giving case studies.
3. Mini projects on software engineering and usage of tools.
4. Preparation of analysis reports.
Table: Summary of the gaps and additional content/activities
Known gap Additional Content/ activities Institute Activity

Interaction amongst stake Students are encouraged to visit industries Industrial training and
holders Expert talks are arranged from industry people Visits, Invited Talks.
on specific and interdisciplinary subjects
spreading across the curriculum.
Group discussions, LCD presentations are Group discussions
added in regular timetable to improve and, LCD
presentation and communication skill. presentations
Professional societies (ISTE, CSI, ASM) to

improve leadership and managerial qualities Professional and student
with exposure to latest technological trends. associations activities
National conference, short term training National conference,

Skill development. programmes, technical quizzes and cultural short term training
events (MANDARA), technical seminars are programmes,
arranged by the staff and students to improve technical quizzes and
leadership and managerial qualities, to provide cultural events
depth and breadth, and also to get updated (MANDARA),
knowledge of various emerging fields. technical seminars
Special need based Student Training
Programmes are designed for the skill
Student Training
development of the students. These programs
Programmes
are designed in collaboration with the industry
and academia.

PBL (Project Based Learning) and Activity

Based Learning. Here, concepts of lab
innovations are incorporated in a curriculum to
involve students in self learning (learning by Lab innovations
doing) practices and to implement their ideas in Exhibition and design
actual practice. Students are motivated for contests Industrial
learning since they work on new ideas projects.
Students -centred learning
generated by them or as directed by a faculty.
practices.
They were facilitated by the institute by
funding good lab innovations and exhibition
and design contests.
Institute promotes the students to work with Project competition &
industry to carry out projects. As a result, many industry projects
students have done industry projects.
Department is conducting various Value Digital Hackathon,

addition programmes on various Modern Tools Techtronic Event
Exposure to Modern tools and Programming Languages. Also, in
technical events students gets practice to use
modern tools.
In addition to professional and individual Teacher Parent
counselling are added in a regular timetable in meetings
Students interaction sessions which faculty and students interact with each
other on various topics prevailing during that
period.
2014-15 CAYm1: (Current Academic Year minus 1)
TARGET ATTAINME OBSERVAT

PO PO ACTION 1 ACTION 2
LEVEL NT LEVEL ION
Graduates will possess

knowledge on applying
mathematics, applied 60 78.14 Good Nil Nil
PO1
sciences and foundational
engineering concepts.
Graduates will possess strong

fundamental concepts on data
structures, database
60 80.98 Good Nil Nil
PO2 technologies, operating
systems, compiler designs,
advanced programming,

Graduates will develop

expertise, confidence for self 60 79.19 Good Nil Nil
PO3
and lifelong learning through
management techniques.

various leadership and
management skills with best 60 87.40 Excellent Nil Nil
PO4
professionalism and ethical
values with social concern.
Graduates will demonstrate

with an ability to deploy,
analyze, troubleshoot,
PO5 maintain manage and secure
the computer networks and
design various networking
abilities.

to design and develop web
60 84.51 Excellent Nil Nil
PO6 solutions with user friendly
and rich graphical user
interfaces.

and possess fundamental
knowledge on computer
architecture, embedded 60 77.84 Good Nil Nil
PO7
systems, design of digital,
analog systems and
communications using
various hardware concepts.
Graduates will be able to

communicate with
60 80 Good Nil Nil
PO8 confidence in both verbal and
return forms with great
professionalism.


with an ability to design, 60 83.05 Excellent Nil Nil
PO9
develop, test and debug the
software.

excellent programming, 60 81.77 Excellent Nil Nil
PO10
analytical, logical and
problem solving skills.
Graduates can participate and

succeed in competitive
examination and interact with 60 79.45 Good Nil Nil
PO11
their peers in industry and
society as engineering
professionals.
2014-15 Attainment
100
90
Attainment percentage---->
80
70
60
50
40 PO Attainment
30
Target
20
10
0
PO'S------------------>
Fig.7.2 Graph Analysis for PO Attainment Level for 2014-15

2013-14 CAYm2: (Current Academic Year minus One Year)
TARGET ATTAINME OBSERVA ACTION

PO PO ACTION 1
LEVEL NT LEVEL TION 2

knowledge on applying
PO1 mathematics, applied sciences
and foundational engineering
concepts.
Graduates will possess strong

fundamental concepts on data
structures, database
PO2 technologies, operating
systems, compiler designs,
advanced programming,
Graduates will develop

expertise, confidence for self 60 83.36 Excellent Nil Nil
PO3
and lifelong learning through
management techniques.
Graduates will possess various

leadership and management
skills with best professionalism 60 85.3 Excellent Nil Nil
PO4
and ethical values with social
concern.

with an ability to deploy,
analyze, troubleshoot, maintain 60 81.96 Excellent Nil Nil
PO5
manage and secure the
computer networks and design
various networking abilities.
Graduates will demonstrate to

design and develop web 60 81.65 Excellent Nil Nil
PO6
solutions with user friendly and
rich graphical user interfaces.

Graduates will demonstrate and

possess fundamental knowledge
on computer architecture,
PO7 embedded systems, design of
digital, analog systems and
communications using various
hardware concepts.
Graduates will be able to

communicate with confidence 60 79.25 Good Nil Nil
PO8
in both verbal and return forms
with great professionalism.

with an ability to design, 60 79.24 Good Nil Nil
PO9
develop, test and debug the
software.

excellent programming, 60 79.15 Good Nil Nil
PO10
analytical, logical and problem
solving skills.
Graduates can participate and

succeed in competitive
examination and interact with 60 77.4 Good Nil Nil
PO11
their peers in industry and
society as engineering
professionals.
2013-14 Attainment
100
Attainment percentage---->
80
60
40
PO Attainment
20
Target
0
PO'S------------------>
Fig.7.3 Graph Analysis for PO Attainment Level for 2013-14

7.2 Academic Audit and actions taken thereof during the period of Assessment
ACADEMIC AUDITING
The Academic Audit is a faculty-driven model of ongoing self-reflection, collaboration, team work and peer
feedback. It is based on structured conversations among faculty and peer reviewers all focused on a common
goal to improve quality processes in teaching and learning and thus enhance student success.
Objectives of Academic Auditing.

1. To enhance the teaching and learning process and to ensure quality of technical education throughout the
system
2. To take care functionalities of technical education.
3. To motivate teachers to adopt and use of ICT in teaching, learning process.
4. To provide feedback mechanism used for assessing the performance of teachers by students and for
curricular development.
5. To provide Computer, internet and library facilities available.
6. To device Mentoring systemetc
Table: 7.2 Internal Audit report Format 2015-16(ODD & EVEN)
Action Plans
Activities Responsible Resources Frequency Outcomes Sign
Actions
Committee/Persons
Status:
Accomplished
Department Partially
Course VTU Web
Calendar will 01 accomplished
VTU Coordinator Site
be prepared Not
Calendar Accomplished
Modified
Remarks:
All the Status:

Activities is Accomplished
VTU
carried on the Partially
Department Calendar &
basis of Course 01 accomplished
Calendar College
department Coordinator Not
Calendar
calendar as Accomplished
shown below Modified

Action Plans
Actions
Committee/Persons
Remarks:
Status:
Individual Accomplished
Faculties opting Partially
for subjects accomplished
Subject based on their Not
01
opted and interest All Faculties Accomplished
Allotted to Assignment of and In-House Modified
the Staff the subjects to HOD
the Individual
faculties
Remarks
Preparation of Status:
the Academic Accomplished
class Time Partially
Preparation Course
Table In-House 01 accomplished
of Time Coordinator
Not
Table
Accomplished
Modified
Remarks:
Preparation of Status:
workload of the Accomplished
individual Course Partially
faculty member Coordinator In-House 01 accomplished
Workload
Not
Accomplished
Modified
Remarks:
Status:
Course Owner
Accomplished
Identify Identifying All Faculties &
Partially
Course Course Course
In-House 01 accomplished
Outcome Outcome based Coordinator
Not
(Theory & on Courses
Accomplished
Lab) allotted
Modified
Remarks:
CO-PO Based on the Status:

All Faculties &
Mapping Course Accomplished
Course
(Theory & Outcome In-House 01 Partially
Coordinator
Lab) Identified by accomplished
the Course Not

Action Plans
Actions
Committee/Persons
Owner, CO-PO Accomplished
mapping is Modified
done
Remarks:
As prescribed Status:
by the VTU Accomplished
CIRCUMLUM, Partially
PERIODIC
Course Owner accomplished
LESSON Course File
will decide the In-House 01 Not
PLAN Coordinator
time required Accomplished
(Theory &
for Unit Modified
Lab)
/MODULE
Coverage
Remarks:
Status:
Accomplished
As per the
Partially
periodic plan, Course File EVERY
Session In-House accomplished
course owner Coordinator DAY
Strategy Not
will execute.
Accomplished
Modified
Remarks:
Percentage of Status:
Syllabus Report
Percentage Coverage by Dr Suresh H, Inter Submitted to
02
of Syllabus the course Dept. of Chemistry Department Principal and
Coverage owner is Department
monitored Head
Remarks
Individual
Status:
Student
Report
provides
EC, Inter Submitted to
Student feedback for 01
Dept. Department Principal and
Feedback every course
Department
owner for their
Head
course handled
Remarks:
Internal Evaluation for Status:

Question Quality of IA Report
Paper QP. IAC IA QP 3 Submitted to
Quality Department
Assessment Head

Action Plans
Actions
Committee/Persons
& Remarks:
Evaluation
Internal Status:
Assessment Accomplished
Test Conducted Partially
Internal Assessment
Internal as per VTU In-House 03 accomplished
Test Coordinator
Test Guidelines Not
Accomplished
Modified
Remarks:
Status:
Accomplished
Partially
Marks accomplished
Scheme of All Faculties In-House 03
Distribution Not
Evaluation
Accomplished
*Modified
Remarks:
Status:
Accomplished
Partially
Course Owner
prepares accomplished
Not
Scheme of detailed All Faculties In-House 03
Solution solution for Accomplished
Modified
evaluation
Remarks:
Status:
Accomplished
Sending
Partially
Students IA
IA Reports IA Coordinator In-House 03 accomplished
Performance to
to Parents Not
Parents
Accomplished
Modified
Remarks:
Mentor Status:
Mentor - Councils Accomplished
Mentee Mentor -Mentee In-House 3
Students Partially
Based on the accomplished

Action Plans
Actions
Committee/Persons
Performance of Not
Internal Accomplished
Assessment test
and Class
Attendance
Remarks:
Based on the Status:

Performance of Accomplished
Internal Partially
Parent Assessment test Parent Cell In-House 1 accomplished
Interaction Course Owner Not
Interacts with Accomplished
Parents
Remarks:
Status:
Course Owner
identify Given
Assignment/ students to Course Owner In-House Variable
Seminar enhance their Not Given
skill
Remarks:
Status:
Technical
Accomplished
Seminar for Seminar
In-House 01 Not
Seminar Final year Coordinator
Accomplished
students
Remarks
Status:
Accomplished
Project work Project Coordinator In-House 03 Not
Project
Accomplished
Remarks
Individual Status:
Student Accomplished
Self Feedback All Faculty In-House 01 Not
Assessment Based on Accomplished
Report Questionnaires
Remarks:
Course Individual Course Coordinator In-House 01 Status:

Action Plans
Actions
Committee/Persons
Exit Student Accomplished
Survey Feedback is Not
taken w.r.t Accomplished
Knowledge
gained with
each course
Remarks
Result Analysis Status:

coordinator will Accomplished
analyze the Not
final exam Result Analysis VTU Web Accomplished
Final Result 01
result of each coordinator Site
Analysis
course &
Report given to
the HOD
Remarks:
Availability of Status:
Sufficient books Library Coordinator In-House 01 Yes
Department in the Partially
Library Department
No
Remarks:
Availability of Status:
Sufficient Yes
Internet Speed Partially
Stock verification In-House
and hardware
Internet and Committee 01 No
Components in
Hardware
the
Department
Remarks:
HOD-CSE
NOTE: Seminar and Project Auditing will not be included for the odd semester
External Audit: Local Inspection Committee (LIC) carried out annually by VTU,
Belagavi.
7.3. Improvement in Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneur

Assessment is based on improvement in:
Placement: number, quality placement, core industry, pay packages etc.

Higher Studies: performance in GATE, GRE, GMAT, CAT etc., and admissions in premier
institutions
7.3.1 Placement Details :-( 2013-Till Date)
Table.7.3 Placement Details from 2012-2016
Sl Total No of Total No of Students Percentage of student

Year
No Students Placed placed
1 2012-13 111 28 25.22%
1 2013-14 121 55 45.08%
2 2014-15 122 42 32.78%
3 2015-16 122 31 24.59%
4 2016-17 114 25 21.92%
140
121 122 122
120 111 114
Total No of Students---->
100
80 Total No of
Students
60 55
50
Total No of
40 28 30 Students Placed
25
20
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Acadamic Year---->
Fig:7.4 Placement details from 2012-16

Percentage of Students Placed 2012-2016

50.00% 45.08%
45.00%
40.00%
Percentage
Percentage ----->
35.00% 32.78%
of student
30.00% 25.22% 24.59% placed
25.00% 21.92%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Acadamic Year------->
Fig. 7.5 Percentage of Students Placed 2012-2016
7.3.2 Higher Studies :-( 2013-2016)
Table: 7.4 Audit report format 2015-16(ODD & EVEN)
Year
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Total No of
Students 9 18 17 05
Perusing
Higher Studies
20
Higher
18 Studies
18 17
16
Total Students----------->
14
12
10 9
8
6 5
4
2
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Academaic Year-------->
Fig. 7.6 Graph Analysis of Student Pursuing Higher Studies for 2012-16

Placement & Higher Studies

90
78 76
80
70
60 55 54
49 49
ITEMS
50 45
40 35
30 25
17 18 18
20 12
10 9 9
10 5 5 3 5 6
0 0 0 0
0
2015-16 2014-15 2013-14 2012-13 2011-12
Number of Eligible Students 49 45 78 54 76
On Campus 25 35 55 18 49
Number of Companies Visited 5 10 12 5 6
Higher Studies 5 17 18 9 9
Off Campus 3 0 0 0 0
Fig. 7.7 Placement & Higher Studies
7.4. Improvement in the quality of students admitted to the programme

Assessmentisbasedonimprovementintermsofranks/scoreinqualifyingstatelevel/national level entrance
tests, percentage Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics marksin12th Standard and percentage marks of the
lateral entry student.
TOTAL INTAKE (PUC): - 120
Table: 7.5 Consolidate Total Intake
NO OF STUDENTS ADMITED
SL NO ACADEMIC YEAR PERCENTAGE
TO PROGRAM
1 2013-14 111 92.5
2 2014-15 115 95.83
3 2015-16 117 97.5
4 2016-17 118 98.33

NO OF STUDENTS ADMITTED TO PROGRAM

120
118
118 117
116 115
114
NO OF
112 111 STUDENTS
110 ADMITED TO
PROGRAM
108
106
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Fig. 7.8 Number of Students Admitted to the program
TOTAL INTAKE (LE): - 24(20% of Total Intake in Program)
Table: 7.6 Consolidate List of Students Admitted To Program
NO OF STUDENTS
SL NO ACADEMIC YEAR
ADMITTED TO PROGRAM
1 2013-14 19
2 2014-15 25
3 2015-16 31
4 2016-17 17
NO OF STUDENTS ADMITED TO PROGRAM

35 31
30
25 NO OF
25 STUDENTS
19 ADMITED TO
20 17 PROGRAM
15
10
5
0
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Fig. 7.9 Number of Students Admitted to the program

Consolidated CET Rank Details (PUC)

Table: 7.7 Starting Rank and Ending Rank of the Students Admitted to the program
SL NO ACADEMIC YEAR STARTING RANK (PUC) ENDING RANK(PUC)
1 2013-14 6851 110153

2 2014-15 10841 122795
3 2015-16 5651 121810
4 2016-17 10436 155646
PUC CONSOLIDATED CET RANK DETAILS 2013-14 TO 2016-17

180000
155646
160000
140000 122795 121810
120000 110153
100000
STARTING RANK
80000
60000 ENDING RANK
40000
20000 6851 10841 5651 10436
0
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Fig. 7.10 PUC Consolidated CET Rank Details 2013-14 to 2016-17
Lateral Entry Students List for the Academic Year: - 2013-14 TO 2016-17
Table: 7.8 Lateral Entry Students List for the Academic Year: - 2013-14 TO 2016-17
SL NO ACADEMIC YEAR STARTING RANK (LE) ENDING RANK (LE)
1 2013-14 2759 16006

2 2014-15 833 19902
3 2015-16 1673 21610
4 2016-17 272 21463

LATERAL ENTRY CET RANK DETAILS 2013-14 TO 2016-17

25000
21610 21463
19902
20000
16006
15000
STARTING RANK
10000 ENDING RANK
5000
2759
1673
833 272
0
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Fig. 7.11 Lateral Entry CET Rank Details 2013-14 to 2016-17

PART B
Institute Level Crietria

CRITERION 8
Facilities and Technical support

CRITERION 8 First Year Academics 50
8. FIRST YEAR ACADEMICS (50)
8.1 First Year Student-Faculty Ratio (FYSFR) (05)

Details of student faculty ratio for first year is as shown in table 8.1
Table 8.1: Details of student- faculty ratio for first year

Number of Students Number of Faculty
YEAR (approved intake Members FYSFR
strength) (considering fractional load)
2015-16
740 36 20.55
2014-15 740 27 27.40
2013-14 740 26 26.15
Average 740 29.66 24.94
ASSESSMENT
3.00
8.2 Qualification of Faculty Teaching First Year Common Courses (5)
Table 8.2: Details of qualification of faculty teaching first year

YEAR X Y RF Assessment of Faculty qualification (5x + 3y)/RF
2015-16 10 61 49 4.75
2014-15 8 84 49 5.96
2013-14 6 70 49 4.90
Average Assessment 5.20

8.3 .FIRST YEAR Academics Performance (10)
Table 8.3: First Year Academics Performance of students for the Year 2013-14
No of
No of Successful
Students Total marks of all
DEPARTMENT Student or
appeared in Successful students
Eligible students
Exam
Computer science 110 56 56755
Civil Engineering 121 78 81031
Electronics and communication 101 68 71621
Electrical Engineering 118 76 78710
Mechanical Engineering 126 70 73048
ISE IT IP 65 18 17960
SUM/TOTAL 641 366 379125
Mean of the percentage of marks of all Successful students 66.83
Academic Performance 3.82
DEPARTMENT No of Students No of Successful

Total marks of all
appeared in Student or
Successful students
Exam Eligible students
Computer science 113 80 73803

Civil Engineering 121 83 77898
Electronics and
communication 113 88 83130
Electrical Engineering 115 91 83784
Mechanical Engineering 131 103 95660
ISE IT IP 66 41 34007
SUM/TOTAL 659 486 448282
Mean of the percentage of marks of all Successful students 59.51

No of
No of Grade Point
Successful
Sl. Students Average of all
DEPARTMENT Student or
No. appeared in Successful
Eligible
Exam students
students
1 Computer science 116 100 633.325
2 Civil Engineering 113 89 515.495
Electronics and
3
communication 92 75 485.52
4 Electrical Engineering 92 79 506.91
5 Mechanical Engineering 122 91 548.695
6 ISE IT IP 44 33 183.765
SUM/TOTAL 579 467 2873.71
Mean of Grade Point Average of all Successful students 61.54
8.4 Attainment of Course Outcomes of first year courses (10)
8.4.1 Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the
evaluation of Course Outcome of first year is based (5)
In the Outcome Based Education (OBE), assessment is done through one or more than
one processes, carried out by the institution, that identify, collect, and prepare data to
evaluate the achievement of course outcomes (COs).
Assessment tools are categorized into two methods to assess the course outcomes:
direct methods and indirect methods.
Direct methods display the students knowledge and skills from their performance in
the continuous internal assessment tests, semester examinations and classroom and
laboratory assignments etc. These methods provide a sampling of what students know and/or
can do and provide strong evidence of student learning.
Indirect methods such as surveys will reflect on students learning. They assess
opinions or thoughts about the graduates knowledge or skills and they are valued by different
stakeholders.

Define the course objectives & course outcomes
List out the Activities/Assessment tools

Course Design that address each outcome
At the end of the course, assess the

students for all the tools Implement the
(I.A/Assignment.. etc..,) action plan in
next offering of
Course
Set target
(Ex 60% of the students score Recommend an
more than 12 in I.A & more than Action plan from
grade 4 in external exam) course owner
80% of the Direct Assessment

&20 %of the Indirect Assessment
to be combined for course
assessment
Check Whether
Enhancement of Yes Target Achieved No
CO Target
Figure 8.1: Course Outcome Assessment Process


Direct Assessment Methods
Direct Assessment
Sl no Description
Method
It is a metric to continuously assess the attainment of course
outcomes, students learning domains and thus improve the teaching
learning process. The Internal Assessment marks in a theory paper
shall be based on two tests generally conducted at the end of 8 and 12
Internal
1. weeks of each semester. An additional test may be conducted for the
Assessment Test
desirous students before the end of the semester to give an opportunity
to such students to improve their Internal Assessment Marks.
Average of the better marks obtained from any two tests shall be the
Internal Assessment Marks for the relevant subject.
Lab Assessment is a metric to mainly assess students practical
Lab Assessment knowledge with their designing capabilities .In the case of a Practical, the
2.
Test IA marks shall be based on the laboratory journals/reports, conduction
of experiments and one practical test.
Theory Semester Semester theory examinations are the metric to assess whether all the
3.
Examination course outcomes are attained w.r.t course objectives framed by the
instructor. Semester Examination is more focused on attainment of
Practical course outcomes and uses a descriptive exam. Practical semester
4. Semester examination focuses on conduction of experiments and vice-voice.
Examination
Indirect Assessment Methods
Course Exit Collect information from the students to assess the learning outcomes of
9.
Survey the course at the end of the semester.

Course Outcome Assessment methodology, tools and frequency of use for direct and indirect
method is described in the table below:
Table 8.7: CO Assessment tools for direct and indirect method

Internal At the end of 8th Students performance in PAC

Course
1. Assessment and 12th weeks of internal assessment
owner PC/HOD
Test each semester. booklets.
Lab Students performance in PAC

At the end of the Course
2. Assessment conducting experiments and
semester owner PC/HOD
Test journal writing.
Theory
At the end of the Students performance in
3. Semester University Evaluators
semester university exams.
Examination
Practical Students performance in

At the end of the
4. Semester conducting experiments University Evaluators
semester
Examination during university exams.
CC
Course Exit Course
5. Semester end Student survey PAC
Survey Owner
PC

8.4.2 Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to set
attainment levels
The attainment of course is evaluated based on the following rubrics.
Percent of students who score more than 60 % in Internal Assessment.

Percent of students who score more than 40% in External Assessment.
Table 8.8: Record of the attainment of Course Outcomes for all first year courses in the year
2015-16
Course
Course code / Course TARGET
CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 REMARKS
Name University LEVEL
code
C101 15MAT11 Engineering Maths I 57.16 55.34 60.40 57.63 60 Not Attained
C102 15PHY12 Engineering Physics 72.67 71.30 73.24 60 Attained

Elements of Civil
C103 15CIV13 77.79 75.83 77.58 82.35 60 Attained
Engg. & Mech.
Elements of Mech.
C104 15EME14 69.67 71.12 72.34 71.55 60 Attained
Engg.
C105 15ELE15 Basic Electrical Engg. 59.08 58.80 58.33 57.95 60 Not Attained
C106 15WSL16 Workshop Practice 92.25 92.19 98.22 60 Attained
C107 15PHYL17 Engg. Physics Lab 75.12 90.15 74.92 60 Attained

Cont. of India, Prof.
Partially
C108 15CPH18 Ethics and Human 48.48 48.48 57.52 58.98 60
Rights
Attained
C110 15MAT21 Engineering Maths I 57.55 55.89 59.83 57.98 60 Not Attained
Engineering
C111 15CHE12 79.23 79.02 78.49 77.64 60 Attained
Chemistry
Programming in C and Partially
C112 15PCD13 56.67 60.71 52.20 57.23 60
Data structures Attained
Comp. Aided Engg.
C113 15CED14 67.96 78.43 78.38 78.43 60 Attained
Drawing
C114 15ELN15 Basic Electronics 67.24 67.64 67.40 67.86 60 Attained
Computer
C115 15CPL16 68.75 71.53 66.90 70.52 60 Attained
Programming Lab
C116 15CHEL17 Engg. Chemistry Lab 73.28 73.28 60 Attained
Environmental
C117 15CIV18 93.25 90.27 92.41 92.18 60 Attained
Studies
C119 15MAT21 Engineering Maths II 58.83 61.39 61.93 61.67 60 Attained
C120 15PHY22 Engineering Physics 79.91 79.15 82.35 60 Attained

Elements of Civil
C121 15CIV23 78.26 75.84 77.71 82.21 60 Attained
Engg. & Mech.
Elements of Mech.
C122 15EME24 86.41 87.07 87.70 87.12 60 Attained
Engg.

C123 15ELE25 Basic Electrical Engg. 71.66 72.13 72.26 71.58 60 Attained
100.0
C124 15WSL26 Workshop Practice 92.96 92.96 60 Attained
0
C125 15PHYL27 Engg. Physics Lab 78.47 94.16 78.47 60 Attained
Cont. of India, Prof.
Partially
C126 15CPH28 Ethics and Human 52.46 52.48 61.79 60.41 60
Rights
Attained
C128 15MAT21 Engineering Maths II 68.60 71.92 72.11 72.37 60 Attained

Engineering
C129 15CHE22 80.10 74.76 80.33 80.49 60 Attained
Chemistry
Programming in Cand
C130 15PCD23 72.48 71.07 71.82 71.28 60 Attained
Data structures
Comp. Aided Engg.
C131 15CED24 74.94 85.64 85.64 85.64 60 Attained
Drawing
C132 15ELN25 Basic Electronics 68.67 68.47 68.58 68.50 60 Attained
Computer
C133 15CPL26 77.53 80.45 75.56 79.59 60 Attained
Programming Lab
C134 15CHEL27 Engg. Chemistry Lab 79.07 79.07 60 Attained
Environmental
C135 15CIV28 80.49 79.41 80.76 78.42 60 Attained
Studies
ATTAINMENT OF COURSE OUTCOME FOR THREE COURSES

Table 8.9: Course Name C130: Programming in C & Data Structures, Year of study: 2015-16.
COURSE OUTCOME STATEMENT
C130.1 Achieve knowledge of design and development of C problem solving skills.

C130.2 Understand the basic principles of Programming in C language.
C130.3 Design and develop modular programming skills.
C130.4 Understands the basic concepts of pointers and data structures.

CO-PO/PSO Mapping
PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 PO 11 PO 12 PSO 1 PSO 2
C130.1 3
C130.2 3 3
C130.3 3 2 1
C130.4 3
Co Attainment
75
%CO TARGET
CO Attainment (%)
70
C130.1 67.93 60 65
C130.2 67.85 60 60 %CO
55
C130.3 68.04 60 TARGET
C130.1 C130.2 C130.3 C130.4
C130.4 69.47 60
Course Outcome

PO 1 PO 2 PO 3 PO 4 PO 5 PO 6 PO 7 PO 8 PO 9 PO 10 PO 11 PO 12 PSO 1 PSO 2
%PO ATT 67.93 67.85 68.04
TARGET 60 60 60
PO Attainment
80.00
PO Attainment (%)
60.00
40.00
%PO ATT
20.00
TARGET
0.00
PO 1 PO 2 PO 3 PO 4 PO 5 PO 6 PO 7 PO 8 PO 9 PO 10PO 11PO 12PSO 1 PSO 2
Program Outcome
Table 8.10: Course Name C115: Computer Programming Lab, Year of study: 2015-16.
C115.1 Able to identify the organization of computer and use programming concepts
C115.2 Able to draw flowcharts and write algorithms.
C115.3 Able to design and develop C programming skills and modular programming skills.
C115.4 Able to trace and debug a program.
CO-PO/PSO Mapping
PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PSO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2
C115.1 3 3 3 3 2 1
C115.2 3 3 3 2 2
C115.3 3 3 3 2 2
C115.4 3 3 3 3 2 1 3
CO Attainment
%CO TARGET
100
C115.1 79.5 60
Co Attainment (%)
80
C115.2 82.68 60 60
C115.3 74.2 60 40
%CO
C115.4 81.77 60 20
0 TARGET
C115.1 C115.2 C115.3 C115.4
Course Outcome

PO PO PO PO PO PO PSO PSO
PO 1 PO 2 3 PO 4 PO 5 6 7 PO 8 PO 9 10 11 12 1 2
%PO ATT 95.40 95.40 95.40 95.40 31.80 31.80 74.20
TARGET 60 60 60 60 60 60
PO Attainment
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
PO 1 PO 2 PO 3 PO 4 PO 5 PO 6 PO 7 PO 8 PO 9 PO 10 PO 11 PO 12 PSO 1 PSO 2
Table 8.11: Course Name C104 Elements Of Mechanical Engg, Year of study: 2015-16.
Able to classify and understand Various Energy sources, Boilers, steam formation, Prime
C104.1
movers like IC and EC Engine.
C104.2 Able to explain operation on lathe, drilling, milling and basic principles of Robotics and
Automation.
C104.3
Able to define and describe various Metal Joining processes and engineering materials.
C104.4 Able to describe principle and operation of refrigeration and air-Conditioning systems.
CO-PO/PSO Mapping
PO 1 PO 2 PO 3 PO 4 PO 5 PO 6 PO 7 PO 8 PO 9 PO 10 PO 11 PO 12
C104.1 2 2 2 2 2
C104.2 2 2 2
C104.3 2 2 2
C104.4 2 2 2
CO ATTAINMENT
% OF ATTAINMENT
TARGE 100
%CO 80
T
60
C104.1 52.45 60 40
%CO
C104.2 58.69 60 20
C104.3 60.13 60 0 TARGET
C104.4 60.92 60 C104.1 C104.2 C104.3 C104.4
COURSE OUTCOMES

PO PO PO PO PO PO
PO 1 PO 2 3 PO 4 5 PO 6 PO 7 8 9 10 11 PO 12
%PO ATT 38.70 34.97 38.70 37.05 38.56
TARGET 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
PO ATTAINMENT
100
% ATTAINMENT
80
60
40 %PO ATT
20 TARGET
0
PO 1 PO 2 PO 3 PO 4 PO 5 PO 6 PO 7 PO 8 PO 9 PO PO PO
10 11 12
PROGRAM OUTCOMES
8.5 Attainment of Program Outcomes of all first year courses (20)
8.5.1 Attainment of Program Outcomes in 2015-16
Describe assessment tools and processes used for assessing the attainment of each PO
PO Assessment Tools
Assessment tools are categorized into direct and indirect methods to assess the program
outcomes and course outcomes.
Direct methods display the students knowledge and skills from their performance in the
continuous assessment tests, endsemester examinations. These methods provide a
sampling of what students know and/or can do and provide strong evidence of student
learning.
Indirect methods such as surveys and classroom assignments to reflect on students

learning. They assess opinions or thoughts about the graduates knowledge or
skills and they are valued by different stakeholders.
Use of Rubrics for Evaluation and Assessment of POs

The Course/Programme outcomes are difficult to measure such as assessing critical
thinking, creativity, analytical skills, and problem solving etc. Hence the department
has adopted Criterion Referenced Rubrics to assess the POs and COs wherever appropriate.
The Rubric criteria are either developed by department faculty or sometimes even
with consultation with students and distributed before an assignment or test.
Rubrics are used for both formative and summative assessment of students. Same
rubric is used for assessing an outcome so that the faculty is able to assess student
progress and maintain the record of the same for each student.
The rubrics are shared with students before being evaluated so that they are aware of
the performance criteria and their weightage.

PO Direct Assessment Methods
Direct Assessment
Sl no Description
Method
1. Internal Assessment It is a metric to continuously assess the attainment of course
Test outcomes, students learning domains and thus improve the teaching
learning process. The Internal Assessment marks in a theory paper shall
be based on two tests generally conducted at the end of 8 and 12 weeks
of each semester. An additional test may be conducted for the desirous
students before the end of the semester to give an opportunity to such
students to improve their Internal Assessment Marks. Average of the
better marks obtained from any two tests shall be the Internal Assessment
Marks for the relevant subject.
2. Lab Assessment Lab Assessment is a metric to mainly assess students practical
Test knowledge with their designing capabilities .In the case of a Practical, the
IA marks shall be based on the laboratory journals/reports, conduction of
experiments and one practical test.
3. Theory Semester Semester theory examinations are the metric to assess whether all the course
Examination outcomes are attained w.r.t course objectives framed by the instructor.
Semester Examination is more focused on attainment of course outcomes
4. Practical Semester
and uses a descriptive exam. Practical semester examination focuses on
Examination
conduction of experiments and vice-voice.
PO Indirect Assessment Methods
Indirect Assessment
Sl no Description
Method
1. Collect information from the students to assess the learning

Course Exit Survey
Program Outcome Assessment methodology, tools and frequency of use for direct method is
described in the table below:

Table 8.13: PO Assessment tools for direct and indirect method

At the end of 8th

Internal Students performance
and 12th weeks Course PAC
1. Assessment of each
in internal assessment
owner PC/HOD
Test booklets.
semester.
Students performance
Lab
At the end of the in conducting Course PAC
2. Assessment
semester experiments and journal owner PC/HOD
Test
writing.
Theory
At the end of the Students performance
semester in university exams.
Examination
Students performance
Practical
At the end of the in conducting
semester experiments during
Examination
university exams.
CC
Course Exit Course
5. Semester end Student survey PAC/HOD
Survey Owner
PC

The Step-by-step process for assessing Program Outcomes is shown in the below figure:
Analysis of each Outcome into elements

by Program Coordinator
Set of Attributes are Generate well designed Surveys

defined for each element to assess the outcome
Define and set the targets
To address the outcomes, each outcome

is assessed in several courses
Course owner collects the qualitative and

quantitative data used for outcome assessment
in a continual process
Program Assessment Committee/HOD

analyzes collected Data
Department Advisory Board Recommends

content delivery methods/course Outcome
outcomes/curriculum Attained
Fig 8.2: Process of Program Outcome Assessment

The Step-by-step process for assessing Program Outcomes
Table 8.14: Process for Assessing Program Outcomes
Step 1: The program coordinator analyses each outcome into elements (different abilities
specified in the outcome) and a set of attributes are defined for each element. (actions that
explicitly specify mastery of the abilities specified). In addition generate well designed surveys
to assess the outcome.
Step 2: For each outcome, define and set the targets.
Step 3: Identify / Select courses that address the outcome (each course contributes to at least one
of the outcomes). Hence, each outcome is assessed in several courses to ensure that students
acquire an appropriate level in terms of knowledge / skills of an outcome.
Step 4: The course owner collects the qualitative and quantitative data and uses for continual
process of outcome assessment.
Step 5: The Program Assessment Committee/HOD analyzes the collected data. If the assessed
data meets the performance target which are specified in step 2 , the outcome is attained ,
otherwise consider step 6
Step 6: The Department Advisory Board recommends content delivery methods / course
outcomes / curriculum improvements as needed.

Procedure followed in first year academics for PO attainment

Course Outcome
CO-PO Mapping
Setting the
Weightage for
CO-PO Mapping
Setting the Target

for CO
Assessment
Assessment
CO PO/PSO
Attainment Attainment
Check for PO/ PSO

Attainment attainment Gap
Next Action Plan for

Enhance Targets Closing PO Gap
Course
Fig 8.3: Flow chart of procedure followed in first year academics for PO attainment

Table 8.15: Attainment of Program outcomes of all first year courses in the year 15-16
Course
code /
Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
University
code
C101 15MAT11 53.41 41.48
C102 15PHY12 72.67 71.30
C103 15CIV13 52.55 58.33
C104 15EME14 47.45 47.19 47.45 47.26
C105 15ELE15 29.34 45.69 45.29
C106 15WSL16 76.14 65.00 32.69
C107 15PHYL17 80.13 80.13
C108 15CPH18 56.50 67.80 51.07
C110 15MAT11 49.27 42.29
C111 15CHE12 78.72 52.48
C112 15PCD13 57.30 60.85 48.88
C113 15CED14 78.43 68.63 78.43
C114 15ELN15 67.69 45.13
C115 15CPL16 82.34 82.39 82.44 82.39 44.08
C116 15CHEL17 58.62 75.93
C117 15CIV18 54.93 27.47
C119 15MAT21 48.29 44.82
C120 15PHY22 79.91 79.15
C121 15CIV23 45.89 64.71
C122 15EME24 58.05 57.60 58.05 57.82
C123 15ELE25 35.95 56.02 55.86
C124 15WSL26 75.26 64.42 38.05
C125 15PHYL27 83.70 83.70
C126 15CPH28 57.33 68.80 46.08
C128 15MAT21 53.60 53.60

C129 15CHE22 80.42 53.62
C130 15PCD23 72.48 71.07 71.82
C131 15CED24 85.64 74.94 85.64
C132 15ELN25 68.66 45.70
C133 15CPL26 92.93 92.91 92.91 92.91 43.35
C134 15CHEL27 63.25 94.88
C135 15CIV28 54.93 27.47
Direct Attainment 62.95 61.49 48.77 84.84 54.83 40.01 77.97 87.67 87.65 46.14
Attainment of Program Outcome in 2015-16

100.00
90.00
80.00
PO Attainment (%)
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00 Direct Attainment
30.00 Target
20.00
10.00
0.00
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Program Outcome
Fig 8.4 Plot of percentage of PO attainment v/s program outcomes

8.5.2 Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of relevant POs (5)
PO Attainment Levels and Actions for improvement in 2015-16
Table 8.16: Attainment Levels, observations and actions
Target Attainment
Pos Observations
Level Level
Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems
and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate
PO3
consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and
environmental considerations.
To the first year level, few Courses are mapped to PO3 with low
60 48.77
weightage.
Action 1:Practice sessions with some more models which involve design & development of
Sheet metal with training will be conducted to attain PO3
Action 2: Assignment and tutorial class are conducted for all courses.
PO6 assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities
relevant to the professional engineering practice.
60 54.83 Students have general awareness about the society
Action 1: Awareness and motivation Programs are to be conducted
Target Attainment
Pos Observations
Level Level
Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering
PO7 solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need
for sustainable development.
60 40.01 Lack of awareness about the Environment and sustainability
Action 1: Quiz must be conducted after completion of every module.
Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
PO12 independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.
To the first year level, few Courses are mapped to PO12 with
60 46.14
low weightage.
Action 1: Workshop and Seminars are to be conducted on current and advancing
technologies.
Note: PO4 and PO11 will be attained at higher semester.

Program outcomes (PO)

Academic year 2015 -2016
Table 8.15: Program outcomes of all first year courses in the year 15-16
PO PROGRAMME OUTCOMES
Number
Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science,
PO1 engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of
complex engineering problems.
Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze
PO2 complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first
principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering
PO3 problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs
with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural,
societal, and environmental considerations.
Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and
PO4 research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data,
and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and
PO5 modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex
engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
PO6 assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent
responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.
Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional
PO7 engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the
knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities
PO8 and norms of the engineering practice.
Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member
PO9 or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with
PO10 the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to
comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective
presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
PO11 engineering and management principles and apply these to one's own work, as a
member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary
environments.
Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to
PO12 engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological
change.

CRITERION 9
Student Support Systems

CRITERION 9 STUDENT SUPPORT SYSTEMS 50
9. STUDENT SUPPORT SYSTEM (50)
9.1 Mentoring system to help at individual levels 5
The Institute is working towards enhancing the institutional culture to better serve the
needs of an ever-changing and dynamic learning community. Effective mentoring begins
with the faculty. When it comes to academic success and persistence, there is no substitute
for a healthy relationship between faculty and students.
Mentoring and Guidance provides
Encouraging students to discuss their ideas.

Encouraging students to try new techniques and expand their skills.
Each faculty looks after 15 students. The faculty monitors their progress and reports
to department in-charge of counseling cell. This mentoring is for over-all development of the
student. A counseling sheet is maintained by faculty, where attendance, examination marks
and family details are recorded. The same is continued till the student completes his/her
graduation. The periodic status will be submitted to the parents/Guardians.
Type of Mentoring: Professional Guidance/Career advancement/Course work specific

/Lab specific/Total development (Mentoring covers all types of guidance)
No. of students per mentor: 15
External Mentoring: 1. Professional Guidance
2. Career Guidance
Non-Academic Mentoring (External Mentoring)
Table 9.1:Non-Academic Mentoring
Sl. Type of Frequency of

Procedure followed
No Mentoring meeting
Professional Seminars/training/mock tests/professional
1 Every 6 months
guidance guidance
Career Conducting group discussions, debates, quiz,

2 Every 6 months
advancement online tests, etc

Academic Mentoring (Internal mentoring)
The Institute is working towards enhancing the institutional culture to better serve the
needs of an ever-changing and dynamic learning community.
Mentoring and Guidance provides encouragement to the students as under:
Encouraging students to discuss their ideas.
Encouraging students to try new techniques and expand their skills.
Reassure students of their skills and abilities to succeed.
Teach students how to break large tasks into smaller, more manageable ones to avoid
becoming overwhelmed.
Mentoring gives the extraordinary opportunity to facilitate a student's personal and

professional growth by sharing knowledge they learn through years of experience. Mentoring
will give students an "inside look" at career options and coach them on the skills that will
improve their success.
Mentoring Activities
1. The interaction meeting will be conducted for departmental freshers / new comers.
2. Mentor Mentee meeting will be conducted periodically.
3. Mentoring also includes, encouraging students to participate in multi faceted activities
(group discussions, quiz, debate and other co curricular, extra curricular and sports
activities).
4. Counseling students having poor academic performance, as reported by the concerned
class Co-ordinators/ mentors in presence of their parents/guardians.
5. Mentoring report shall be submitted monthly to mentoring Co-ordinators and the
same will be submitted to Parent cell Co-ordinator.
POLICY MECHANISM OF MENTORING SYSTEM
Table 9.2: Policy mechanism of mentoring system
1 Mentors Teaching faculty act as Mentor

No. of students per
2 15
mentor
Meeting is conducted every month after internal
3 Frequency of meeting
assessment
The Parents feedback is collected after every meet by
4 Parents feedback
respective mentors
The feedback analysis will be referred by the HODs for
5 Analysis
corrective measures, through Head of the Institution

Note: Mentoring formats are enclosed in the Annexure 9.

9.2 Feedback Analysis and Reward/Corrective measures taken, if any 10
The feedback collection process is very important for the improvement of the
Institution. The faculty feedback is collected from the students every semester. This process
contributes to evaluate faculty performance for reward / corrective measures. The feedback
forms are given to the students during the regular class hours and collected by the inter
department faculty.
Average Percentage of Students who participate:

Students having attendance more than 75% are participated.
The feedback analysis process:

The inter department faculty collect the feedback forms and prepare the consolidated
Report is forwarded to the Principal Office for further Corrective measures. The same will be
sent to respective HODs.
Indices of Rating for Faculty
Grading Points
Excellent 9.1 - 10
Good 7.1 - 9.0
Average 4.1 - 7.00
Below Average 1- 4
The teaching performance indices are analyzed by the Principal office and the same is
conveyed to the concerned.
Basis of reward / corrective measures:
The indices used for measuring quality of teaching, learning and summary of the
index values is mentioned in the Annexure 9.
System of Reward:
Best performing faculty is rewarded by issuing a letter of appreciation. Performance
rating of faculty through student feedback system is one of the factors in evaluating the
annual performance and to release the annual increments.
Corrective Actions taken:

The faculties performing below average are trained continuously through Faculty
Development Programme to improve the quality of the staff.

9.3 Feedback on facilities 5
The Institute has a mechanism for collection of feedback from students every
semester on the various facilities like library, Internet etc. The format is specified in the
Annexure 9. The feedback collected is analyzed and forwarded to Principal office for
corrective measures.
Note: The format of feedback on facilities is enclosed in the annexure-9.
9.4 Self Learning 5
Self-learning help students to develop sense of responsibility, that equips with the
essential attributes they require for their career. Self learning helps students in gaining
knowledge and applying to larger domains. Self learning helps better understanding of the
discipline.
Facilities, Materials and Scope for self learning

E-learning
Technical Talks
Workshops
Webinars
E-learning details:
Table 9.3: E-learning details
Sl
Facilities Information Resources
No
1 Digital Library Notes, Question Papers, Manual Solutions etc
2 VTU Edusat CDs available for all the subjects

Communication skills, vocabulary, phonetics
3 Language Lab
etc.
NPTEL online
4 Available Online
courses
Note: Self learning facilities are enclosed in the Annexure 9.

MOOC:
A massive open online course is an online course aimed at unlimited participation and
open access via the web. In addition to traditional course materials such as filmed lectures,
readings, and problem sets, many MOOCs provide interactive user forums to support
community interactions between students, professors, and teaching assistants (TAs). MOOCs
are a recent and widely researched development in distance education which was first
introduced in 2008 and emerged as a popular mode of learning in 2012.
Learning beyond syllabus and creation of facilities for self-learning is to make

the students well-verse in all the directions. The format for this system is as specified
below.
CONTENTS BEYOND SYLABUS
RYMEC supports students to learn the subjects in a broader way so as to inculcate the
skills of creativity, applying domain knowledge for practical problems and to improve the
quality of self-learning. Contents beyond the syllabus are given to students by the respective
subject teachers in the form of:
Case Studies
Mini Projects
Assignments
9.5 Career Guidance, Training and Placement 10
CAREER GUIDANCE
Career guidance for engineering students is a must so that graduates can discover
their strengths and weaknesses before venturing out into the highly competitive world, some
precautionary as well as career-boosting measures need to be taken by graduates. The
students are guided by mentors.
TRAINING AND PLACEMENT CELL

Campus training and placements play a major role in shaping up the career goals of
students. To cater this, an independent Training and Placement Cell is in function in the
institute since 2001. The Training and Placement Cell is headed by Concerned Officers and
supported by Departmental co-ordinators.

The vision of the training and placement cell is Transforming every student - an
employer's choice. Our mission is Develop the students to face global competitive world
with confidence and attain desired placement. Our industry partners are TCS, JSW. Our
Trusted recruiters are TCS, HCL, Mphasis, Igate, Cigital, SLK Software Services, Advanced
electronics Ltd, Global Edge, Tech Mahindra, L&T, Accenture, Mind Tree, JSW, Kirloskar
and many more.
Pre Placement Training:
During campus placements, recruiters test for an array of skill sets in their potential
employees. In addition to being knowledgeable in their core subjects, students should also
possess a great aptitude and soft skills. Hence pre placement training is necessary. The pre
placement training is initiated from the first semester of the academic year. Focus Academy
for Career Enhancement (FACE), Smart Training Resources, Chennai and Universal
Education, Bangalore are our academic partners for pre placement training. The portal
support of FACE now, will be used where in a student during 6th and 7th semester has to
take at least 30 mock tests as a part of curriculum and is incorporated in the regular class time
table. In addition, TCS specific training by FACE is also arranged. For the students who are
in the final year, pre placement training is given by Quantech Origin during the vacations
between 4th and 5th semester (5 days) and between 5th and 6th semester (5 days). Two days
TCS specific training is imparted to them by Universal Education, Bangalore and one day
specific training is imparted to them by Quantech Origin, Bangalore. From the academic year
2015-16, portal support of FACE now will be taken which offers 30+10 mock tests. Mock
test is made mandatory during the 6th and 7th semester for all students. Students have to take
on mock test every week and will be incorporated in the regular time table.
CONTENTS OF PRE PLACEMENT TRAINING FOR THE STUDENTS
Name of the Trainer: FACE (Focus Academy for Career Enhancement)
Table 9.4 Training Details
Name of
Semester Purpose Pedagogy Duration
Course
Freshman Ice-Breaker, Orientation to Discussion
1 or 2 Induction Placements, Need for Training Based 18 Hours
Program and Goal Setting
Konfident Communication Confidence Experiential
2 or 3 42 Hours
Ice Breaker Learning

Parts of speech
Tenses
Speech & Modals
Adjectives & Adverbs
Voice & Conjunction
Subject-Verb Agreement
Who gets the heart?
LD test & The Reporter
Extempore
Support and Criticize
Story Mason
Who gets the heart?
LD test & The Reporter
Extempore
Support and Criticize
Picture Connector
Group Discussion
Group Discussion & Feedback
Body Language
Interviews - Introduction
My Interview
Communique Grammar & Vocabulary Discussion
4 36 Hours
Based
Invigorate Soft Skills Blended 42 Hours
5
Learning
Empower Holistic Communication Skills Blended
Development (CSD) program Learning
6 focusing on all 4 key skills 48 Hours
Reading, Writing, Listening &
Speaking
Campus End-to-end Aptitude training + Discussion
7 Placement Resume Building, GD, PI Based 60 Hours
Cracker
Wizard IT Technical Training on Blended
6 or 7 Structured Programming and Learning 36 Hours
Object Oriented Programming
GDPI Tips and tricks to crack GD and Blended
7 12 hours
PI Learning
Company
Specific Test
Taking
Strategies, One
Just Company
mock test closely
before Specific One Day
Company Specific Training modeling your
placemen Aptitude Training
Slot 1 recruiter's
t Cracker
actual paper,
Detailed
discussion, email
help-desk

TRAINING
Details of the Trainer and Training Contents
Trainer: Quantech Origin, Bangalore. Duration: 60 Hours
Quantitative aptitude
Basic math(numbers and puzzles)
HCF,LCM and simple and compound interest
Data suffiency 1
Data suffiency 2
Analytical Reasoning
Logical Reasoning 2
Progression
Permutation and Combination
Ratios and Proportion
Averages and Blood Relations
Percentages, Profit and loss
Speed, time and distance
Time and Work
Logical Reasoning 1
Data Interpretation 1
Data Interpretation 2
Verbal aptitude
Parts of speech & Vocabulary Building
Synonyms, Antonyms
Analogies
Sentence Completion Sentence Correction & Incorrect sentence
Reading comprehension 1
Reading comprehension 2
Error detection
Soft skills
Group discussion
Personal interviews
Resume building
Grooming

Training attended
Table 9.5 Training Details
Company
Sl Total
Year Date name for
no students
Training
TCS Specific
18-08-2016 to 22-08-2016 Training from
FACENOW
Universal
29-7-2016 to 30-07-2016 Education
Bangalore
TCS Pre
Placement
Talk from
18-07-2016
Santosh, TCS
BLore
Universal
Education
21-03-16 to 23-03-16
Bangalore
Universal
Education
27-01-16 to 31-01-16 Bangalore,
India.
1. 2016-17 90
SMART
Training
Resources
27-01-16 to 31-01-16
India Pvt Ltd
Chennai
Focus
academy for
27-01-16 to 31-01-16 career
enhancement
Bengaluru
Universal
Education
21-9-16 to 22-09-16
Bangaloru
Quantec
Origin
TCS specific
25-9-2015
Training.
Bangalore

Universal
21-03-2016 to 23-03-2016
Education
Universal
27-01-2016 to 23-03-2016
Education
SMART
27-01-2016 to 23-03- Training
2015-16 2016 Resources 85
2. India Pvt Ltd
focus
academy for
27-01-2016 to 23-03-2016 career
enhancement
10th and 11th Sep 2015 TCS 80

3. 2014-15 21 to 31 Jan 2015 in Quantec
84
auditorium Origin
Quantech
25th to 30TH JULY 59
2013-14 origin
4. Tech
10TH SEP 60
Mahindra
11TH OCT TCS 90
5. 2012-13 10th to 19th Jan TCS 90
9.6 Entrepreneurship cell 5
Entrepreneurial development today has become very significant, in view of its being a
key to economic development and to bring entrepreneur qualities among students. The
objectives of industrial development, regional growth, and employment generation depend
upon entrepreneurial development. Entrepreneurs are the seeds and fruits of industrial
development. The Entrepreneur gives greater employment opportunities to unemployed
youth.
Entrepreneurship is a process of actions of an entrepreneur, who is a person always in

search of something new and exploits such, ideas into gainful opportunities by accepting the
risk and uncertainty with the enterprise. The Institution has taken initiation to inculcate the
spirit of entrepreneurship among all the students.
. The Entrepreneurship Development Cell is headed by Chief Coordinator and

supported by Departmental co-ordinators. The Institution has collaborated with the
DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTER (DIC), Bellary.

Proposal 1:
Educating computer basics to the public domain
In this regard the DIC has given the proposal of educating computer basics to the
public domain (for strength of 20) for providing job opportunities. This project gives a
financial assistance for each student and the teaching faculty. The duration of the course will
be 30 days. The syllabus and the time table will be decided by the host institution.
Proposal 2:
Implementation the live projects
The DIC has given the proposal for Final year students to implement the live projects
of state government with certificate.
Note: The necessary documents are enclosed in Annexure 9.
One day workshop on Entrepreneurship Skills by DIC team.
One day seminar on Design Clinic Scheme and Innovation.
Fig 9.1 : Entrepreneurship Awareness workshop by DIC Ballari.

Fig 9.2 : MSME Programme under Entrepreneurship Development Cell
9.7 Co-curricular and Extra-curricular Activities 10
Students are engaged in co-curricular and extracurricular activities and field trips
through student chapters and forums, which provide opportunities for students to explore new
fields of interest, cultivate leadership skills, and learn teamwork. In this regard institution has
framed various committees for participating and organizing the cultural and sports activities.
Fig 9.3 Personality development programme

Sports, Ground and Facilities:

The Institution has a sports ground. There are well equipped gymnastics and sports
kits. Students are encouraged to participate in various zonal and inter-zonal tournaments.
Students participate in inter and intra collegiate and University tournaments. Sports day is
celebrated with various sports events like Athletics, Long Jump, Volleyball, Table Tennis,
Cricket, Chess, and Carom etc. both for staff and students, as part of recreation.
Institute has following Facilities:
Cricket ground
Indoor stadium
Swimming pool
Yoga & meditation centre
Hockey ground
Running track
Volleyball Court
Football ground
Basket ball court
A well qualified physical director will manage all sport activities.
Note: The necessary documents are enclosed in annexure 9
NSS (National service scheme)

The motto of NSS Not Me, But You, reflects the essence of democratic living and
upholds the need for self-less service. NSS helps the students develop appreciation to other
persons points of view and also show consideration to other living beings. The philosophy
of the NSS is well reflected in this motto, which underlines on the belief that the welfare of
an individual is ultimately dependent on the welfare of the society on the whole and
therefore, the NSS volunteers shall strive for the well-being of the society.
ACTIVITIES OF NSS UNIT:

NSS UNIT is organizing several useful programs for the society. The programs like
Blood donation camp, free medical camp, helping towards flood affected people, Health
education programs, tree plantation etc. are successfully conducted. The students and NSS
volunteers of RYMEC are donating the blood frequently on request by the patient side at
VIMS Bellary.

Fig 9.4: Tree Plantation by NSS Unit
Fig 9.5: Blood donation camp
Fig 9.6: NSS Visit to Drought Areas

Criteria 10
Governance,Institutional Support and Financial
Resources

GOVERNANCE, INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT AND

CRITERION 10 FINANCIAL RESOURCES 120
10. Governance, Institutional support and Financial Resources (120)

10.1 Organization, Governance and Transparency 40
10.1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the Institute (5)

VISION OF THE INSTITUTE
To Produce Professionally Excellent, Knowledgeable, Globally Competitive,
Socially Responsible Engineers and Entrepreneurs.
MISSION OF THE INSTITUTE
M1: To provide quality education in Engineering and Management.
M2: To establish a continuous Industry Institute interaction, Participation and
Collaboration to contribute skilled Engineers.
M3: To develop human values, social values, entrepreneurship skills and
professional ethics among the technocrats.
M4: To focus on innovation and development of technologies by engaging in cutting

edge research areas.
10.1.2. Governing body, Administrative Setup, And Functions of Various Bodies,
Service Rules, Procedures, Recruitment, And Promotional Policies (10)
The Governing Body:
Governance is the key activity that connects between the management, staff, students
and the community. The governing body of Institution is a legal structure responsible for the
overall functioning of the college. In general, it is responsible for the Quality of service
(QoS) the college offers to the student and other local community and society, as well as the
college annual budget, health and strategic direction. Institution has a governing body in
place wherein the members are drawn from distinguished cross-sections of the society as
shown in Table 10.1. The governing body meets frequently as shown in Annexure 10.

Table 10.1 Structure of Governing Body

Sl.
Name Designation Occupation
No.
1 Sri Allum Basavaraj President Mine owner
Vice President &
2 Sri Yeachareddy Satish Mine owner
Chairman, RYMEC
3 Sri Udeda Basavaraj Secretary Advocate
4 Sri Mundasada Muppanna Treasurer Business
5 M.Hanumanthappa Member Business
6 Sri V. Nandeesha Sri Member Land Lord
Dr. Hiregoudar
7 Member - Secretary Principal, RYMEC, Bellary
Yerrenagoudaru
8 Dr. Puttamadappa VTU Nominee Principal, SCE, Bangalore
DTE Nominee,
9 Director, DTE Director, DTE Bangalore
DTE Bangalore
AICTE Nominee (SWRO), Regional officer-AICTE
10 Regional officer
Bangalore Bangalore
Industrial Vice-President JSW,
11 Sri H.R.Lal
Representative Toranagallu, Bellary
The Administrative Setup:

Institute believes in dedicated work culture with love and affection to each and every
stake-holder. Involvement of each and everyone in the decision-making and transparency
associated therein also form the important features of the work culture. A core team of 24 to
28 members lead the processes in the institute. The administrator list is given below.
Table 10.2 List of Administrators
Sl. No Name Designation Responsibility
Sri Yeachareddy Vice President &
1 Administration
Satish Chairman, RYMEC
2 Sri M.Hanumanthappa Member Administration
3 Sri V. Nandeesha Member Administration
Dr. Hiregoudar Administration & Mechanical Research
4 Principal
Yerrenagoudaru Coordinator
Dean Academic & Admission, Research
5 Dr. Savita Sonoli Vice-Principal
Coordinator(ECE)
Dr. T. Hanumantha Dean (Training & Examination), Convener
6 Professor & HOD
Reddy for NBA, Research Coordinator (CSE).
7 Nagabhushan H M Associate Professor Dean(P&D), Hostel Warden
8 Dr. K Veeresh Professor Departmental Academic Work
Professor & PG Departmental Academic Work, Chief
9 Dr. C Thotappa
Coordinator Warden
10 Dr. H M Professor & PG Academic Work

Somasekharaiah Coordinator
Departmental Academic Work,
11 Dr. H M Mallikarajuna Professor & HOD
Consultancy Work
12 Dr. Kori Nagaraj Professor & HOD Departmental Academic Work
13 Dr.Pradeep Joythi Professor & HOD Electrical Maintenance
EMS Coordinator, VTU Examinations,
Network Maintenance, Digital Library,
14 Dr. B Sreepathi Professor & HOD
Online Placement Test, Consultancy Work
for online Test.
15 Dr. A Thimmanagouda Professor Departmental Academic Work
16 Dr. Arun Kumar G Professor& HOD Departmental Academic Work
Departmental Academic Work, Dean
17 Dr. Phakirappa Jeevargi Professor & HOD (Academic & Student Welfare for first
year).
Dr. Hiremath Suresh
18 Professor & HOD Departmental Academic Work
Babu
19 Dr. N M Nagabhushan Professor & HOD Research Coordinator(PHYSICS)
20 Dr Shaheeda Banu S Associate Professor Departmental Academic Work
Associate Professor
21 Smt. Rakhee Patil Departmental Academic Work
& HOD
Associate Professor
22 Gururaj K K Training & Placement
& Placement Officer
Sri. A T
23 Asst. Professor RYMEC Website Coordinator
Sathyanarayana Reddy
24 Smt Sapna B Kulakarni Asst. Professor Girls Hostel Deputy Warden
25 Sri Shiva Prasad Asst. Professor Boys Hostel Deputy Warden
26 Sir. Panindra Reddy K Asst. Professor Girls Hostel Deputy Warden
27 Smt. Chinna V Gowdar Asst. Professor EDUSAT Coordinator
28 Sri Vishwanath Reddy Librarian Library
Functions of Various Bodies:

Table 10.3 Governing Council and its Functionalities
Position Functions
Frame directive principles and policies

Governing
Amend and approve policies from time to time
Council Approve budgets
Frame directive principles and policies.
Amend and approve policies from time to time
To look after the overall development of institute
Chairman
Mobilize external resources to strengthen the institute
Plan & provide necessary facilities / equipment for
development.
Design & define organization structure.
Delegates responsibilities of various positions in the
organization.
Principal Ensure periodic monitoring & evaluation of various
processes & sub- processes.
Ensure effective purchase procedure

Define quality policy and objectives

Conduct periodic meeting of various bodies such as
Governing Council, Womens Grievances Redressal
Committee etc.
Manage accounts and finance
Employee recruitment process
To discharge routine duty of Principal during absence of
Principal
Annual Magazine
Resource Provision
Transport
Housekeeping including hostels
Prepare and execute academic calendar
Oversee the teaching-learning process
Vice- Principal Carry out result analysis and submit corrective measures to
Principal
Initiate supplementary teaching measures
Co-curricular activities
Formation of student council
Cultural activities
Sports activities
Student discipline
Student health care
Plan and execute academic activities of the department
Maintain discipline and culture in the department
Head of the Maintain the department neat and clean
Departments/ Pick and promote strengths of students / faculty / staff
P.G Monitor academic activities of the department
Coordinators Propose Department Budget
Maintain records of departmental activities and
achievements
Propose admission policy
Arrange campaign
Execute the admission process
Administrative
Design and print admission brochure
Officer Maintain and update college website
Maintain softcopy of photographs
Publicity of events
Liaison with industry
Training and
Identify and provide for training needs of students
Placement Arrange campus interviews
Officer Proposing annual T & P budget
Superintendent- Corresponding with AICTE, DTE, VTU, etc
(Establishment, accounts, College roster
admissions) Service Books
Faculty personal files
Recruitment process
Maintain minutes of meeting
Co ordinate day to day activities of office
AICTE, DTE, VTU, etc committee preparation
Annual College budget
Librarian Plan and execute modus operandi of routine activity of the
library
Plan and propose expansion / development

Maintain library discipline and culture

Prepare annual budget for library
Alumni Association Arrange periodic meetings of student council
Ensure alumni registration
Prepare alumni news letter
Arrange annual alumni meet ( Apoorva Milana )
Proposing annual budget
Director of Physical Ensure smooth conduct of sports
Education Ensure proper use of gymnastics
Purchasing of sport items
Encourage students to participate in zonal tournaments
Creation and upkeep of sports facilities
Proposing annual budget
Student Professional Forum Organize events through students professional societies /
chapters
Encourage student participation
Publication of technical magazine and news letters
Record of student participation and achievements in Co-
curricular and extra curricular activities
Service Rules:
Service rules are constituted by V.V Sangha and mentioned in V.V Sangha Institution
service Manual.
Note: Services rules are enclosed in Annexure 10.
Recruitment Procedure:
The approval to the required posts for various departments as per statutory norms
is taken from the Governing council and notification in the news papers, to invite
applications as per AICTE norms.
After receiving the applications, scrutinizing and short listing of eligible candidates
is done on merit basis for various departments.
Panel of experts comprise of VTU/DTE/AICTE/Industrial Nominee, Principal,
HOD, subject expert will interview the eligible candidates.
The selected candidates are appointed and orders are issued.
Appointed Candidates should report to the duty on or before the given time.
Procedures and Promotional Policies:

Policies regarding promotion are as per AICTE.
Additional increments are given to faculty who excel in academics and research.
Note: Promotional policies are enclosed in Annexure 10.

10.1.3. Decentralization in working and grievance redressal mechanism
The institute functions with decentralized administration as depicted in Fig 10.1.
Fig 10.1 Decentralized administration
Grievance redressal mechanism:

The institute has a grievance redressal mechanism. The grievances of students, faculty
and parents are eventually taken care by department HOD/referred to respective committees
and further taken to the Principal Office.
To take care of any major grievance a central grievances redressal committee is
constituted.

Table 10.4 Central Grievances Redressal Committee

Sl. Name of the Faculty Designation Department Contact
No Number
Dr. Hiregoudar 9448043949
1 Principal Principal
Yerrenagoudaru 08392-245328
2 Dr. K Veeresh Professor Mechanical 9448055265
3 Dr. T. Hanumantha Reddy Professor & HOD CSE 9448844232
4 Dr. A. Thimmana Goud Professor Mechanical 9448130466
5 Sri. T.H. Patel Associate Professor Civil 9448056770
6 Dr. B Sreepathi Professor & HOD ISE 9448173113
7 Dr. H. Girisha Professor CSE 9449135047
8 Sri. Dalal Shivakumar Associate Professor E&CE 9845107252
Associate Prof &
9 Smt. Rakhee Patil IT 9886710496
Head
Prof & Chief
10 Dr. C Thotappa Mechanical 9343210056
Warden
11 Dr. Hiremath Suresh Babu Professor & HOD Chemistry 9449620826
12 Dr. Phakirappa Jeevargi Professor & HOD Maths 9448895789
13 Sri. K Raghavendra Prasad Associate Professor EEE 9448035570
14 Sri Dhandin Ramesh Assoc Professor Mechanical 9448649003
15 Sri. M.R. Indudhar Associate Professor Mechanical 9986385154
16 Sri. B. Veeresh Associate Professor Maths 9449632718
17 Dr. M.S. Shobha Associate Professor Civil 9448717958
18 Smt. M. Jayashree Asst. Professor Chemistry 8105274266
19 Smt. S. Prabhavathi Associate Professor ECE 9341035911
20 Smt. Asha Bharathi Associate Professor ECE 9845748643
21 Smt. Anusuya Patil Associate Professor EEE 9480087694
22 Sri. S. Kotresh Associate Professor EEE 8105274266
23 Smt. Pushpalatha Gadag Asst. Professor Civil 9448234820
24 Smt Aparna K.S Asst. Professor CSE 9980293558
25 Smt. Girijavani Asst. Professor IT 9481718384
Assoc. Prof. &
26 Smt Sapna B Kulakarni CSE 9880120909
Warden
Anti- Sexual Harassment Committee:

Table 10.5 Anti- Sexual Harassment Committee
Sl. Name Designation Department Contact Position
No. Number
01 Principal Principal Chairman
Yerrannagoudar 9449950342
02 Dr. K Veeresh Professor Mechanical 9448055265 Member
Professor &
03 Dr. T Hanumantha Reddy CSE 9448844232 Member
HOD

04 Dr. Savita Sonoli Vice-Principal E&CE 9343553487 Member

05 Dr. Hiremath Suresh Babu Prof & HOD Chemistry 9449620826 Member
Prof & Chief
06 Dr. C Thotappa Mechanical 9343210056 Member
Warden
07 Sri. Adanagouda Asst. Professor Civil 9972612107 Member
08 Dr. N.M. Kottureswara Professor Chemistry 9449632718 Member
Associate
09 D Ramesh Mechanical 9448649003 Member
Professor
10 Smt. M Jayashree Asst. Professor Chemistry 8105274266 Member
Associate
11 Dr. M.S Shobha Civil 9448717958 Member
Professor
Professor &
12 Dr. Pakkirappa Jeevargi Maths 9448895789 Member
HOD
Professor &
13 Dr. Kori Nagaraj Mechanical 9448576434 Member
HOD
Associate
14 M.R Vijakumar Civil 9343210056 Member
Professor
Associate
15 Anusuya Patil EEE 9480087694 Member
Professor
Associate
16 T. Viswanath Mechanical 9448842171 Member
Professor
Associate
17 S. Kotresh IT 8105274266 Member
Professor
Assistant
18 Swetha Ramana CSE 9742351584 Member
Professor
Assistant
19 Aparna K.S CSE 9980293558 Member
Professor
Assistant
20 B Kumuda EEE 9742913965 Member
Professor
Assistant
21 Bhagya K.R Physics 9738981936 Member
Professor
Asst. Professor
22 Smt Sapna B Kulakarni CSE 9880120909 Member
& Warden
Anti-Ragging Committee :
The following team members are informed to act members of Anti- ragging group.
Group members are informed to make surprise visits as per the schedule given below
and one of the team members are requested to write a brief report after inspection.
These groups are formed to prevent and to curb the menace of Ragging.

Table 10.6 Anti-Ragging Members

Sl. Name of the member Designation Department Contact
No. Number
9448043949
1 Dr. Hiregoudar Yerrannagoudaru Principal Principal
08392-245328
2 Dr. K. Veeresh Professor Mechanical 9449950342
3 Sri. B. Doddabasavanagoud Associate Prof EEE 9449171271
4 Sri. M.R. Vijayakumar Associate Prof Civil 9343210056
5 Sri Chandrasekhara Hiregoudar Associate Prof IPE 9449763374
6 Sri. Jayashankar .M Associate Prof EEE 9448568166
7 Smt. Nagaveni Biradar Associate Prof CSE 9449003135
8 Sri. T. Viswanath Associate Prof IPE 9448842171
9 Sri. Manjnunath. H.M. Associate Prof Maths 9481709495
10 Sri. K. Phanindrareddy Asst. Professor ECE 9241220917
11 Sri. Sangameswaera Asst. Professor Maths 9880136994
12 Sri. Chidananda.H Asst. Professor CSE 9449380527
13 Sri. A.T. Sathyanarayana Reddy Asst. Professor MCA 9740100941
14 Sri. K. B. Shivananda Asst. Professor MCA 9448781836
15 Sri. H. Nagarajagouda Asst. Professor ISE 9916432339
16 Kum. B. Kumuda Asst. Professor EEE 9742913965
17 Dr. Shaheeda Banu Asst. Professor MBA 9845737140
18 Smt. Renuka.S Asst. Professor MBA 9008399124
19 Kum. K.R. Bhagya Asst. Professor Physics 9738981936
Table 10.7 Anti-Ragging Squad

No. Number
Yerrenagouda 08392-245328
2 Dr. K Veeresh Professor Mechanical 9448055265
3 Dr. A. Thimmanagoud Professor Mechanical 9448130466
4 Dr. T. Hanumantha Reddy Professor & HOD CSE 9448844232
5 Dr. Kori Nagaraj Professor Mechanical 9448576434
6 Dr. N.M. Kottureswara Professor Chemistry 9448717986
7 Sri. Dalal Shivakumar Associate Professor ECE 9845107252
8 Dr Shivakumar Modi Professor Mechanical 9448324719
9 Sri. S.G. Desai Associate Professor Mechanical 9886277459
10 Sri. H. Suredranath Associate Professor ECE 9448262072
11 Sri. Khaza Moinuddin Associate Professor ECE 8105263354
12 Sri. P.K. Pavan kumar Asst. Professor Mechanical 9663591771
13 Sri. Heerasingh Asst. Professor MCA 9986751346
14 Sri. Ravikiran Bandari Asst. Professor MCA 9916315281
15 Sri. Meti Prabhakar Asst. Professor Maths 9036550309

Table 10.8 Committee of wardens

No. Number
Yerrenagoudaru 08392-245328
2 Dr. C. Thotappa Chief Warden Mechanical 9343210056
Asst. Professor
3 Sri.K.M. Shivaprasad & Warden of GN Boys CSE 7899964163
Hostel
Associate Professor &
4 Sri. H.M. Nagabhushan Warden Campus Boys Civil 9448006866
Hostel
Associate Professor &
5 Sri. K.K.Gururaj Warden Campus Boys EEE 9448102503
Hostel
Asst. Prof & Warden
6 Sri. Phanindra Reddy E&CE 9241220917
WW Hostel
Associate Prof
&Warden for
7 Smt. Swapna Kulkarni CSE 9880120909
Gandhinagar Girls
Hostel
10.1.4. Delegation of Financial Powers

Financial powers are delegated to Principal, Vice-Principal and Head of Departments.
10.1.5. Transparency and availability of correct / unambiguous information in public
domain .
Dissemination and Availability of institute/program specific information through the
web:
The institute has hosted its own website which is updated as and when required. The
institute and programme specific information is made available to all aspirants
through the web-site.
The web-site URL is: www.rymec.in
Formation of a Cell in accordance with the provisions of Right to Information Act,

2005:
The institute functions with perfect decentralized administration that has complete
transparency in its functioning.
The institute has formed a RTI cell that provides the correct/unambiguous
information as and when it is demanded.
The composition of RTI cell is given below.

Table 10.9 Composition of RTI cell

Sl. No. Name Position
Dr. Hiregoudar
1 Appellate Officer
Yerrenagoudaru
2 Dr. Savita Sonoli Information Officer
3 Smt. Aparana K.S Assistant Information Officer
10.2. Budget Allocation, Utilization, and Public Accounting at Institute level

CFY-2016-2017
Table 10.10 Details of Total income and Expenditure 2016-2017
Total
Number
Total Income Actual Expenditure
Of
Students
Special
Recurring Projects /
Other Non Expenditure
Fee Govt. Grant Including Any
Sources Recurring Per Student
Salaries other,
Specify
Rs 33756 /
12,63,49,029 -- -- 82,54,835 8,56,51,140 91,35,532 -- 2808
students
CFYm1-2015-2016
Table 10.11 Details of Total income and Expenditure 2015 - 2016
Total
Number
Of
Students
Recurring Special
Fee Govt. Grant Including Projects
Salaries / Any

other,
Specify
Rs 1,04,773
14,83,33,110 -- -- 3,60,47,882 14,91,22,177 6,45,42,755 -- / 2944
students
CFYm2-2014-2015
Table 10.12 Details of Total income and Expenditure 2014 - 15
Total
Number
Of
Students
Special
Recurring Projects
Fee Govt. Grant Including / Any
Salaries other,
Specify
Rs 59,354/
15,82,27,415 -- -- 3,03,62,357 15,05,48,648 4,37,74,869 -- 3274
students
CFYm3-2013-2014
Table 10.13 Details of Total Income and Expenditure 2013 - 14
Total Number
Of Students
Special
Recurring
Other Non Projects / Expenditure Per
Fee Govt. Grant Including
Sources Recurring Any other, Student
Salaries
Specify
Rs 41,199/
14,64,94,189 -- -- 2,69,07,497 10,12,36,265 2,52,02,401 --
3069 Students

Table 10.14 Actual expenses during 2013 - 2017
Items Budgeted in Actual Budgeted in Actual Budgeted in Actual Budgeted in Actual

CFY (2016- expenses in CFY m1 Expenses in CFY m2 Expenses in CFY m3 Expenses in
2017 up to CFY (2016- (2015-2016) CFYm1 (2014-2015) CFYm2 (2013-2014) CFYm3
OCT ) 2017 up to (2015-2016) (2014-2015) (2013-2014)
OCT)
Infrastructure
1,80,00,000 60,76,535 1,44,05,000 3,35,92,423 1,93,35,000 3,77,86,707 3,30,73,000 2,28,40,819
Built-up
Library 55,15,000 1,38,130 43,47,000 37,87,314 59,41,500 38,22,045 40,81,500 93,975
Laboratory
1,37,99,201 27,52,462 2,48,21,940 2,81,07,952 2,73,49,870 44,22,879 1,41,57,450 20,00,873
equipment
Laboratory
11,38,450 8,65,168 - 5,61,566 - 5,88,953 - 4,44,577
consumables
Teaching and
non-teaching 13,24,95,000 7,32,38,073 13,76,25,000 12,19,97,952 11,31,30,000 11,39,18,706 9,72,63,520 8,87,74,046
staff salary
Maintenance
45,65,000 16,05,176 14,05,000 41,05,586 26,15,000 19,09,513 20,58,650 9,56,695
and spares
R&D,
Training 7,25,000 15,05,454 6,60,000 28,73,028 17,39,000 10,94,912 32,50,000 4,91,844
and Travel
Miscellaneous
1,03,15,000 54,61,757 12,61,360 1,42,86,486 3,33,000 - 3,08,000 3,61,610
expenses *
Other, specify 45,95,000 31,43,917 58,65,700 42,15,940 1,42,44,125 1,29,36,121 1,32,88,075 1,02,07,493
Total 19,11,47,651 9,47,86,672 19,93,91,000 21,35,28,247 18,46,87,495 17,64,79,836 16,74,80,195 12,61,71,932
10.2.1. Adequacy of budget allocation

The Budget proposal for the academic year is prepared by the individual departments
as per the guidelines by V.V Sangha and Principal office. The collective budget proposals are
scrutinized by the budget committee at the college level and further taken to governing council
and management council for approval and sanction. Once it is sanctioned, the Principal will
issue the budget order as shown in Annexure 10. The budget allocation and utilization for the
last three years is adequate.

10.2.2. Utilization of allocated funds

Table 10.15 Utilization of allocated funds during 2013 - 2017
2016-2017 2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014
Utilization of
49.58 107 95.55 75.35
the budget (%)
10.2.3. Availability of the audited statements on the institutes website

The audit statements of the academic years are available in the institute website:
www.rymec.in
10.3. Programme Specific Budget Allocation, Utilization
CFY-2016-2017
Table 10.16 Total budget allocation and utilization 2016-2017
Total Budget Actual Expenditure Total Number of

Students =455
Non Recurring Recurring Non Recurring Recurring Expenditure per
student
21,20,650.00 5,60,000.00 17,75,869.00 3,42,087.00 3,903.00
CFYm1-2015-2016
Total Budget Actual Expenditure Total Number

of Students =463
student
32,60,000.00 7,30,000.00 36,07,732.00 12,24,652.00 7,792.00
CFYm2-2014-2015
Total Number
Total Budget Actual Expenditure
of Students =486

student
20,94,000.00 3,10,000.00 16,21,231.00 5,70,888.00 3,336.00

CFYm3-2013-2014
Total Number
Total Budget Actual Expenditure
of Students =476
Expenditure per
Non Recurring Recurring Non Recurring Recurring
student
16,169,730.00 8,00,400.00 9,88,083.00 1,34,878.00 2,076.00
Table 10.20 Actual expenses during 2013 -2017
Items Budgeted Actual Budgeted Actual Budgeted Actual Budgeted Actual

in CFY expenses in Expenses in Expenses in Expenses
16-17 in CFY CFYm1 in CFYm2 in CFYm3 in
(up to oct 1 6 - 1 7 (upto 15-16 CFYm1 14-15 CFYm2 13-14 CFYm3
2016) oct 2016) 15-16 14-15 13-14
Laboratory
5,80,650 4,78,819 20,10,000 18,71,231 6,90,000 1,00,332 3,80,000 69,401
equipment
- - - 2,27,050 - 3,80,099 - -
Software
Laboratory - 21,165 - 21,799 - 1,17,790 - 36,510

consumable
Maintenanc 1,60,00 58,100 4,30,000 7,38,113 2,10,000 2,36,316 3,10,000 -
e and spares
R & D,
4,00,000 2,62,822 3,00,000 4,64,740 1,00,000 2,16,782 4,90,400 98,368
Training and
Travel
Miscellaneou
s expenses for
15,40,000 12,97,050 12,50,000 15,09,451 14,04,000 11,40,800 12,89,730 9,18,682
academic
activities
(ACs)
Total 26,80,650 21,17,956 39,90,000 48,32,384 24,04,000 21,92,119 24,70,130 11,22,961

10.3.1. Adequacy of budget allocation

The department wise budget is sanctioned by VV Sangha office and the sanction letters
are sent to the Principal, RYMEC. The principal along with the respective HODs further
oversees the utilization of the sanctioned budget. After approval of the budget from governing
council and management council the process of procuring is carried out as per the norms
specified by the VV.Sangha.
Note: Guidelines for purchases are mentioned in the annexure 10.
10.3.2. Utilization of allocated funds
Table 10.21 Budget Utilization 2013 - 2017
YEAR 2016-2017 2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014
Utilization of
79.00 121.11 91.18 45.46
the budget (%)
10.4. Library and Internet

10.4.1. Library
Knowledge Centre is established along with the parent institution in the year 1980
with prime objective is to support the parent organization programs. It is having, functionally
designed building and it is located in the convenient accessible place in the college campus to
the different group of library users. The soul of the library builds with our ancient peoples
knowledge bricks. The prime motto of the knowledge centre is to building the knowledge
empowered society.
The mission of the knowledge centre is to meet the expectations of the library
stakeholders with available resources and by integrating external emerging trends with
internal factors. The main goal of the knowledge centre is to improving the service
effectiveness, economy and efficiency of library management system. Safeguard the interest
and benefits of the stakeholders and facilitate to develop the innovative thoughts and
knowledge sharing culture among the library users. The quiver of the knowledge centre
enfolded the both print and digital form of global standard mass and scholarly knowledge
contents.
Digital library:
Digital library system integrated with campus network to enhance the learners body
of knowledge. It is also fostered distribution units at the departments for timely access of
needed information at the work place with zero foot print.

The library management system is automated with Easylib Software to improve the
efficiency of library housekeeping operations and provide speed service to the library users. It
is also collaborated with national information network agencies (VTU e-resources
Consortium & DELNET) and provided Internet and Wi-Fi facility to access required
information.
The library users can also access digital resources through Wi-Fi at Library. The
users can access the digital resources by using web browsers(Chrome and Firefox) by
clicking following url in the campus network:
192.168.8.4:8080 Academic Resources
192.168.8.4:8081 Non-Academic Resources
192.168.8.4/gdlc1
192.168.8.4/gdlc2
192.168.8.4/gdlc3
192.168.8.4/nptel
Scope for self-learning:
The Institute believes that self-learning and learning beyond syllabus have a great
scope in the development of the career of an engineer. Everything in engineering cannot be
taught in the class room or laboratories. The explosion in knowledge related to applied
science and engineering has been so much that four years is too short a period even to cover
one branch of engineering. This fact calls for the relevance for self-learning for young
engineers. What an institution should do is to provide adequate facilities for self-learning to
students so that they get motivated to learn more and more and ultimately become life-long
learners and innovators.
Motivation for self-learning should be provided in the classrooms. A teacher has a
great role to play in this. Discussing subject beyond the syllabus, providing exposure to
exciting developments in science and technology around the globe, attempting solutions to
problems in daily life etc. are the ways to motivate students for self-learning. They should
also be motivated to do things themselves so that they gain confidence to try anything with
their own hands. An institution should provide ample opportunities and facilities for the
students.

Self-Learning Facilities and Availability of Materials for Learning Beyond Syllabus

Institution has provided the following facilities to students for their self-learning and
learning beyond syllabus Infrastructure:
1. 24/7 internet access with Wi-Fi connectivity
2. Smart classrooms/Labs with audiovisual aids
3. AES Software, Language lab, Computer Labs etc.
Learning resources:
1. Committed faculty who motivate students in the process of their learning
2. Reputed Journals from IEEE, ACM, Springer, Wiley etc.
3. Online Databases and Digital Video
4. Licensed Softwares
The institution supports teachers to make learning efficient. The college provides a
central library with all latest books and journals which the faculty can utilize effectively and
provide comprehensive latest information to students. Students are encouraged to use the
library independently to enhance their skills and knowledge.
Apart from this institute provides seminar halls where the students can participate in
group discussions, debates, seminars etc. The institution and faculty members support and
encourage every student to make use of Internet, computers and latest technologies available
to upgrade themselves in their respective field of studies.
Table10.22 Library Details
a. Carpet Area of library (in m2) 943 sqm
b. Reading Space (in m2) 257 sqm
c. Number of Seats in reading space 150 Seats
d. Number of Users (Issue Book) per day (2015-16) 181
e Number of Users (Reading space) per day (2015-16) 63
f. Timings Working day 8.00 am to 8.00 pm
Timings: Weekend 8.00 am to 5.00 pm
Timings: Vacation Closed
g. Number of Library Staff 10

h. Number of Library Staff with degree in Lib. Mgmt. 03
Computerization for search, indexing, issue/return

i. YES
records
J Bar Coding Used? Yes.
k. Library Services on Internet/Intranet Yes.
DELNET &
l. INDEST/DELNET and other similar membership?
VTU Consortium.
Table 10.23 Quality of Learning Resources (Hard/Soft)

a. Availability of Digital library Contents Yes
Number of Courses 10
Number of e-Books 13888
b. Availability of exclusive server Yes
c. Availability over Internet/Intranet Intranet
d. Availability of exclusive space/room Yes
e. Number of users per day. Campus wide
Access on Intranet
Computers are provided with Multimedia facility in central library where students can
access all kinds of e-journals.
o http://ieeexplore.ieee.org
o http://www.sciencedirect.com
o http://www.link.springer.com
o http://www.tandfonline.com
o http://www.crcnetbase.com
o http://ascelibrary.org/journals
o http://search.proquest.com
o www.knimbus.com
Digital library is provided in central library where users can access kinds of e-
resources on/off campus.
The users can access the e-Books/e-journals through Wi-Fi and Digital Library at any
time.

The students can access eBooks/e-journals at library computer Centre as well as in

College Campus and hostels with wifi.
The learning resources centre is open 12 hours a day for use and will be extended on
demand. The Library contains the Reference Section with wide verity of resources, a
quiet study area, the office, and a photocopier room. There is a study area with
computer facilities, and a group study/reading room. Library aims to offer focused
provision for the subjects in which the College admits mature undergraduates as well
as postgraduates. The collection comprises textbooks, general reference material,
Question Bank and career-oriented resources.
Video Course:
o NPTEL can accessed though Digital Library
o NPTEL on online http://nptel.iitm.ac.in/
10.4.2. Internet
Name of the Internet provider BSNL and AirTel

Available bandwidth Table 1
Access speed(LAN) 10/100Mbps
Availability of Internet in an exclusive lab Yes
Availability in most computing lab Yes
Availability of Wi-Fi Yes
Availability in Departments and other units Yes
Availability in Faculty rooms Yes
Institute own e-mail facility to faculty/students Yes
Security/privacy of e-mail/internet users Yes

Table 10.24 Existing internet connection in college
Service Type of
Sl. No Bandwidth Remarks
Provider connection
Used for e-journal access at
1 AIRTEL Leased line 10 MBPS
Library & Wi-Fi
2 BSNL VPN/BB 10 MBPS Under NMEICT scheme
3 BSNL FTTH 10 MBPS MBA dept
4 BSNL FTTH 10 MBPS ME/IPE dept
5 BSNL FTTH 10 MBPS Library dept
6 BSNL FTTH 10 MBPS ECE dept
7 Airtel FTTH 10 MBPS CSE dept
8 Airtel FTTH 10 MBPS ISE dept
9 Airtel FTTH 10 MBPS Civil dept
10 Airtel FTTH 10 MBPS EEE dept
Total 100Mbps
Wi-Fi Locations: Corridor Main Building, Library & PG Block, CSE / ISE and All Hostels.

PART-C

Declaration
(The head of the institution needs to make a declaration as per the format given)
I undertake that, the institution is well aware about the provisions in the NBA'saccreditation
manual concerned for this application, rules, regulations, notifications and NBA expert visit
guidelines in force as on date and the institute shall fully abide by them.
It is submitted that information provided in this Self Assessment Report is factually correct. I
understand and agree that an appropriate disciplinary action against the Institute will be
initiated by the NBA, in case any false statement/information is observed during pre-visit,
visit, post visit and subsequent to grant of accreditation.
~'J
Date: 30 - e) -~/7 Signature &. Name
Place: gejl,4~ Head of the Institution with seal

: PRINCIPAL
E ineenng College
RY.M; .. n,9r.an::!'rEngg. College),
{Formcrty \iIJa'jas
-::;::JL-L.!\RY-58310i.
contonment. I::.

Cse-Sar-Tier 2

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Cse-Sar-Tier 2

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

RAO BAHADUR Y.

SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT (SAR)

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND

RAO BAHADUR Y MAHABALESWARAPPA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, Cantonment, Ballari. 1

RAO BAHADUR Y MAHABALESWARAPPA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, Cantonment, Ballari. 2

5.4 Faculty Retention 187

5.7.3 Development Activities 202

RAO BAHADUR Y MAHABALESWARAPPA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, Cantonment, Ballari. 3

8.2 Qualification of Faculty Teaching First Year Common Courses 252

RAO BAHADUR Y MAHABALESWARAPPA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, Cantonment, Ballari. 4

RAO BAHADUR Y MAHABALESWARAPPA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, Cantonment, Ballari. 5

PART A: Institutional Information

1. Name and Address of the Institution: Rao Bahadur Y. Mahabaleswarappa

2. Name and Address of the Affiliating University: Visvesvaraya Technological University,

3. Year of establishment of the Institution: 1980

4. Type of the Institution:

RAO BAHADUR Y MAHABALESWARAPPA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, Cantonment, Ballari. 6

6. Other Academic Institutions of the Trust/Society/Company etc., if any:

Gangavathi Huvinahadagali, Ballari

Ambli Dodda Harapanahalli, Ballari

Sha Bhavarlal Babulal

Hanagal Veerasaiva College Campus,

Allum Karibasappa Veerasaiva College Campus,

11 Vunki Sanna Rudrappa 1975 Non-Technical Kappagal Road, Y. Nagesh

RAO BAHADUR Y MAHABALESWARAPPA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, Cantonment, Ballari. 7

Sha Babulal Bhavarlal Sha Bhavarlal Babulal

Non- Hagaribommanahalli (T)

Vivekananda public Non- Devalapura, ballari Road,

RAO BAHADUR Y MAHABALESWARAPPA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, Cantonment, Ballari. 8

V. V. Sangha's College Road,Hospet

V.V.Sangha Independent Non- Veerasaiva College

Silver Jubilee Non-

Non- 1st Main, Basaveshwara

Gandharva Sangeeta Kappagal Road, Y.

32 V. V. Sangha's Non- Veerasaiva College

V. V. Sangha's Non- Hagaribommanahalli (P)

Vijayanagara Non- Vijayanagar College

RAO BAHADUR Y MAHABALESWARAPPA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, Cantonment, Ballari. 9

Sl. Program Name Year of Increase Year of AICTE Approval Accreditation

8. Programs to be considered for Accreditation vide this application:

Sl.No Programme Name

RAO BAHADUR Y MAHABALESWARAPPA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, Cantonment, Ballari. 10

9. Total number of employees in the institution:

A. Regular* Employees (Faculty and Staff):

CAY (July 2015- CAYm1 (July2014- CAYm2 (July2013-

Min Max Min Max Min Max

M 124 124 115 133 101 117

CAY (July 2015- CAYm1 (July2014- CAYm2 (July2013-

Min Max Min Max Min Max

RAO BAHADUR Y MAHABALESWARAPPA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, Cantonment, Ballari. 11

10. Total number of Engineering Students: UG

CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

Total no. of girls 1080 1152 1044

Total no. of students 2733 3023 2814

Total number of Engineering Students: PG

CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

Total no. of girls 88 96 107

Total no. of students 210 246 255

RAO BAHADUR Y MAHABALESWARAPPA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, Cantonment, Ballari. 12

11. Vision of the Institution:

To Produce Professionally Excellent, Knowledgeable, Globally Competitive, Socially

12. Mission of the Institution:

M1: To provide quality education in Engineering and Management.