Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Grace Shaw
English 111
6 November 2017
Learning is Messy
The sad truth about writing academic essays, and learning in general, is students are
masters of taking the teachers instruction and only focusing on reaching the expectations of
those requirements. Instead of writing an essay full of critical thinking, thought provoking topics,
unique points of view, etc., students focus more directly on the requirements of the assignment.
For example, a student is assigned a three-page paper. When he/she prioritizes the page
requirement more than well-developed content, the student is often prone to write about
nonsense to fill space. My high school English teacher called it The Art of BSing. This could
be because the student often feels that meeting the requirements like a checklist is their only
form of control in the situation. They cant control how the teacher critiques their writing, but
they can control meeting all the superficial requirements. This directs student effort towards
complying with the requirements point of view, and not their own. A checklist is detrimental to
a students growth in their education because it isnt natural. The consequence they face when
using this checklist mentality for writing is a paper that is dull, insincere, lacking voice and
The enforcers of the checklist are, obviously, some teachers. The stereotypical teacher is
known for giving the requirement list, grading based on that requirement list, and looking no
further than the requirement list. Freedom philosopher Paulo Freire wrote in his book Pedagogy
Shaw 2
of the Oppressed, The solution is not to integrate themselves into the structure of oppression,
but to transform that structure so that they can become beings for themselves (74). Freires use
of the word structure can be used to represent the structure that many teachers hold their
students accountable to. Superficial expectations such as a three-page minimum paper, with three
sources, all used from academic sources, is an example of what clouds the minds of so many
potentially intellectual writers. Freire encourages teachers to not base the requirements on what
they want to see, but to focus on what the student wants to say and how they want to say it.
Alexander Calandra was an emeritus professor of physics at Washington University and wrote
about an interesting encounter he had with a student about a physics question. The student was
told to answer the question, Show how it is possible to determine the height of a tall building
with the aid of a barometer (159). When the student gave his answer to his professor, the
professor gave the student zero credit, due to the fact that he did not answer the question the way
the professor wanted. The students answer was correct, but he did not like the way the answer
was found. After the professor met with Calandra to hopefully be an impartial judge on the
subject, Calandra found that the student knew the solution that the professor wanted him to use.
In fact, he had many different possible solutions. However, when Calandra asked the student if
he knew the proper solution, the student said yes, but, He was so fed up with high school and
college instructors trying to teach him how to think (160). In this case, the professor that came
to Calandra wanting the student to answer the question according to his point of view, and not
the students. Solving math or physics is almost always based on a checklist. When one is trying
to solve a math or physics problem, often it requires following one step, into another step, into
another step, and so on. The teachers point of view was a checklist that he demanded to be
followed, while the student refused to participate in that perspective. The teacher was too
Shaw 3
stubborn to transform his structure, and truly believed that his structure was the only correct way.
Jack Mezirow brings up the concepts of point of view and frame of reference in his writing.
understand our experiences (87). This frame of reference is the structure of which students
build their creativity. When the teacher establishes control of the students voice and creativity,
they do so most often through a list of requirements. Freire says that teachers should be
transforming the structure of their teaching to fit, as Mezirow says, the students frame of
reference. When the teachers effort is shown through taking the time to know and understand
their students best frames of references, and transform the structure accordingly, then they can
rightfully refer to themselves as teachers. A teacher can target their effort towards building a
learning atmosphere that replaces the checklist mentality with a more creative and personal one.
However, learning is not a one-way street. Some teachers have all the enthusiasm
possible to build a beautiful and healthy learning environment for the students, but the student
simply chooses not to participate. Or, the student may even beg for a checklist, because they
dont know any different. Hope is not lost at this point. All it takes is further analysis from the
teacher to find out what is holding the student back from reaching their potential. As Freire says,
Knowledge comes from the invention and reinvention, through the restless, impatient,
continuing, hopeful inquiry men pursue in the world, with the world, and with each other (72).
In other words, Freire knows that the road the teacher travels to pursue students is never easy.
The teacher must be committed to getting he/shes student closer to their level of understanding
on the subject being taught. Even after the demonstration of that commitment, a student may still
shut the teacher down. Nevertheless, it is the persistence the teacher gives that pays off in the
Shaw 4
end, which is when the students eyes are opened to the bigger picture, beyond the checklist.
Mezirow reveals the flaws of checklist thinking by saying, Often, adult learners immediate
focus is on the practical, short-term objectivesit is crucial to recognize that learning needs
must be defined so as to recognize both short-term objectives and long-term goals (90). In this
case, a student may beg for a checklist. The short-term Mezirow is referring to is the
requirements given to the student, but the long term is how well they go beyond the short-term.
The person who Mezirow is asking to recognize the learning needs of students is, of course, the
teacher who is influencing them. The importance of knowing and understanding the
leaner from a great learner. A good learner will learn to stay on the safe and shallow end of the
pool, but a great learner will take the risk of diving deep into the water. The great learner does
this because he/she knows that learning occurs in unconventional ways and methods. Students
with a checklist mentality will focus solely on the assignment, or short-term objective, while the
teacher should be encouraging the student to see the bigger aspect, or the long-term objective.
The long-term is looking into and focusing on their lifelong learning, which is also a main
education should be practiced by teachers in all types of classes, because it is where they will see
the most growth and development from their students. The structure needs to be transformed to
not only require short-term objectives, but also thinking about the long-term ones as well. The
teachers role during a students desire for a checklist is opening the students mind up to what
goes beyond the assignment, which is where the assignment fits in with their education and long-
term goals.
Shaw 5
One powerful tool to change the checklist mentality, which is too frequently overlooked
in our education system, is discourse. This includes using the discourse of other students, but
also converting students to joining the discourse of effective learning. The discourse of effective
learning/education is contrary to a checklist, because it allows for learning outside of the class.
Exercising a students discourse to help them reach an understanding is best utilized in the
classroom. Gerald Graff, Professor of English and education at the University of Illinois, lives
and breathes discourse participation in the classroom. Graff believes that our education system is
lacking in the development of intellectually equipped students when they do not encourage
students to take their nonacademic interests as objects of academic study (204). Academics are,
in this theory, best implemented when so-called nonacademic interests such as cars, rap music,
or sports are introduced. Discourse isnt just a comfort zone for students, it is their way of
thought. Discourse is the oxygen that allows the brain to remain functional. When regarding
discourse incorporation in the classroom, Freire writes, Liberation is a praxis: the action and
reflection of men upon their world in order to transform it (79). The world of each student must
be constantly incorporated into their learning in order to further understand the teaching. When
the requirements given to a student are nowhere related to the way they think and problem solve
the most effectively, it becomes downright unjust. Yet, students have to be a praxis through their
effort, not just the teachers effort. The teacher can set the stage for the student, but it is the
students role to perform the play. Freire also sees the exclusion of discourse as oppression of a
mans rights to his own mind. He states, To alienate men from their own decision-making is to
change them into objects. Students cannot have the ability of decision making in writing, or
learning when the teacher alienates their point of view from the teaching. How can a student
grow in their learning without some sort of connection to the learning? As a member of the rap
Shaw 6
music discourse community, it is second nature for me to not only analyze, but also synthesize
what the artist is saying. The question is, how can a teacher harness that ability of synthesizing
rap music to help the student synthesize in the classroom? It involves the incorporation of that
discourse, which as a direct effect brings in the frame of reference in that discourse to help the
student understand. As described before, discourse is also a powerful tool to combat the checklist
the education discourse is not only a serious commitment, but an essential component to learning
inside and outside of the classroom. Mezirow says that it is the teachers duty to assist learners to
education, and should also be a professional at recruiting new members. Still, the student must be
willing to join this educational discourse. The teacher cannot force them to join. Accordingly,
Mezirow states that this recruitment must be free from coercion (91). Instead of coercing the
student through unrelated requirements and expectations, the teacher should persuade the student
to join the discourse through the incorporation of the students personal discourse. Graffs tactic
of personal discourse in the classroom can be used to reach Mezirows dream of each student
joining the discourse of education. By joining the discourse of education, students are leaving the
Each educator has the option of placing meaningful requirements on the student, or
disregard the students needs by placing careless requirements. Meaningful requirements are as
simple as asking the students to analyze, problematize, and express their thoughts with their own
voice and opinion. On the contrary, careless requirements are superficial and monotonous, and
often show the low expectations that the teacher has for the students. It is that mindset of low
expectations that handicaps a student to blossom into the awesome learner they have potential to
Shaw 7
be. Meaningful requirements are far from a checklist mentality, while careless requirements are
based solely on a checklist. In short, the teachers efforts, which are often displayed through their
requirements and expectations, have a big impact on a students learning. Mike Rose, who has
teaching experience in educational environments such as kindergarten, job training, and adult
literacy programs, is the epitome of teacher effort. In his article Politics of Remediation, he
gives his personal experience on how teacher effort, and the lack thereof, can be the make-or-
break for students. In one of his experiences with a student named James, Rose hypothesizes that
the students prior curriculum wasnt doing a lot to address his weaknesses or nurture his
strengths (21). James put all of his effort and time into a paper based on meeting the
requirements, He did an adequate job of summarizing articles, but fell short analyzing them. The
curriculum Rose speaks of is referring to is not only Jamess past educators, but the requirements
that the educators placed on James. They put requirements on the James without understanding
where he stood in his overall learning career. The problem with this teaching style is some
teachers try to implement a one size fits all teaching method. This does more than fail, it
depletes the educational learning curve. English Professor of Mid Michigan Community College
Barry Alford and Freire also contribute to Roses emphasis on teacher effort by describing the
role of classroom narration. Freire preaches that when the teacher plays the role of narrator, it
(the teachers narration) turns them (students) into receptacles (71). This introduces Freires
Banking Concept, in which teachers are the depositors of information into the students mind,
and the student does nothing beyond holding the information. Freire also describes incorrect
narration as, the teacher talks about reality as if it were motionless, static, compartmentalized,
and predictable (71). Teaching in this format is poses a serious problem of carelessness on the
teachers part, and will lead to a dead end in learning. When a teacher doesnt put forth the same
Shaw 8
emotion in their teaching that they expect from students, it ends up becoming a lose-lose
situation. In contrast, Alford shares the solution to this problem: student narration. First, he opens
up with the question, How, exactly, do we teach our students to think in the complex, rich ways
we expect and value? (279). Then, he continues by describing the solution as, listening to my
studentsby giving them free rein in classroom discussions helps make them owners of the
classroom and the conversations (280). Instead of teachers giving into what Freire paints as a
weak excuse of education, they should base the curriculum and structure around the students
ownership of the classroom, like Alford exercises. Learning is meant to be messy, unorganized,
or down-right unusual; that is something a checklist mentality cant offer. The basis of this hot
mess style of learning starts with the teachers effort to communicate with the students. Mezirow
advises that the ideal form of learning is not instrumental (through manipulation or controlling
the environment or students), but is more communicative (learning the meaning of what is being
communicated) (88). A more communicative approach to learning brings out the students true
point of view, instead of the student working to reach the requirements point of view. Which,
spoiler alert, is nothing more than meeting the lackluster expectations of a mediocre structure.
Its about reaching a consensus between the teacher and the student to understand the
requirements and expectations of the two. The student does have free-will to either be open or
closed to classroom communication. But, when the student and teacher do put forth equal effort
problematizing is a gateway to becoming an effective learner, and getting over the checklist
mentality. Although not easy, it pays off in the end with a self-confident habit of mind. I have
heard from multiple English professors, and have seen for myself, that medical students in
Shaw 9
English class often choose to cling to checklists. They memorize things like the femur bone is
located superiorly to the fibula and tibia. This takes no effort beyond memorizing, or depositing
the information the professor gives them. They see little challenge in this method of learning,
and do not want to learn any other way. When it comes to English class, medical students
struggle greatly because of how much they are required to think outside the requirements. This
makes problematizing difficult for them, because they do not want to problematize. They want to
know the answer, and want to see the one way to get to the answer. However, with English,
finding the answer to a problem takes time and effort into understanding and challenging the
views of others, and yourself. Alford urges for educators to influence learning that engages
students to think through a problem, instead of looking at the problem as already solved by some
allows students to grow intellectually, and as a person. If the problem was treated as already
solved, there would be no worth in education. Problematizing puts the wealth of learning
something new in reality. For example, if the requirements put on students were based on
something that can be reached by anyone, there would be no challenge and no growth. Growth in
the classroom occurs when a problem is given to be solved by the student, and then resolved, and
then resolved. Mezirow agrees by saying, Learning takes place through discovery and the
imaginative use of metaphors to solve and redefine problems (91). Discovery and imagination
goes hand-in-hand with problematizing; problematizing goes hand in hand with learning. When
one learns from a checklist habit of mind, they completely eliminate problematizing from the
equation. Freire advises a teaching style that is opposite from the banking concept he discusses.
education that involves a constant unveiling of reality (81). From posing a problem, the problem
Shaw 10
is solved, and the student discovers a new piece of reality each time he practices it. For each
unveiling of reality through problem posing, the student learns to take control of their education.
This is a requirement that all teachers should impose on their students, because the journey to
that all my classes are based on a checklist mentality. In Anatomy and Physiology class, I am
learned to memorize every bone in the body that my teacher gives a list of. In Medical
Terminology, I am asked to learn 54 terms per week. In order to stay afloat in these classes, I had
to put all my time and effort in only working to memorize the content. Taking the time to
understand it, break it down, and problematize it took way too long. I was clinging to my
checklist for my dear life. However, after a semester in my English class, I have been able to
stray away from the checklist in these other classes. I have done this through reading all the
different philosophies of so many famous authors, synthesizing them, and going beyond
summarizing into critical analysis. This has given me the drive to go beyond the checklist in my
other classes, and engage in learning that is the beautiful mess of autonomous learning.
Shaw 11
Works Cited
and Learning in the 21st Century. Pearson Learning Solutions, 2013, pp. 279-282.
Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 30th anniversary Ed. New York: Continuum, 2000.
Graff, Gerald and Cathy Birkenstein. "Hidden Intellectualism." They Say/I Say: The Moves that Matter
in Academic Writing. Ed. G. Graff and C. Birkenstein. New York: W. W. Norton & Co. 2010,
pp. 198-205.
Mezirow, Jack. Transforming Learning: Theory to Practice. Exploring Connections: Learning in the
Rose, Mike. The Politics of Remediation. Conversations in Context: Identity, Knowledge, and College
Writing. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1998: 32-48. Print.