PROJECT : PAGE :

CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Lateral Drift Compatibility Analysis using Finite Element Method

INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY

STORY HEIGHTS Habove = 14 ft, (4.3 m)

H= 14 ft, (4.3 m), continued top & bot
Hbelow = 16 ft, (4.9 m)

AXIAL LOAD, ASD PDL = 20 kips, (89.0 kN)

D D D
PLL = 18 kips, (80.1 kN)

EXPECTED STORY DRIFT D= 4.2 in, (107 mm)

(ASCE 7-16/10 12.12.5 )
GRAVITY VERTICAL MEMBER INFORMATION
A= 17.6 in2 E = 29000 ksi, (199948 MPa)
` ( 114 cm2) G = 11154 ksi, (76903 MPa)
I= 341 in4
( 14193 cm4)
ANALYSIS
DETERMINE JOINT DEFLECTIONS AND SECTION DESIGN FORCES

JOINT DEFLECTIONS UNDER D ONLY THE DESIGN MEMBER SECTION FORCES UNDER D ONLY
Note X (in) Y (in) q (deg) Note V (k) P (k) M (ft-k)
N1 0 0 0.496192 N2 -33.09 0.000 225.24
N2 0 0.0000 -1.007175 N3 33.09 0.000 238.00
N3 4.2 0.0000 -0.932621
N4 4.2 0.0000 0.457379

Pu = 1.2 PDL + 1.0 PLL = 42.00 kips, SD level

Mu = (PDL + PLL) D + M = 251.30 ft-kips, SD level
Vu = V = 33.09 kips, SD level

Note: The governing case is always that only the design vertical member has Story Drift and other stories no drift, since the other
story at same direction drifts, including PD effects, will reduce the section forces of design vertical member. The opposite story
drifts are not Expected Deformation, because Expected Deformation can not be developed from Linear Modes Analysis
after CQC or SRSS.