Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Ms. Gordon
27 November 2017
Shooting an Elephant
In George Orwells essay, Shooting an Elephant, Orwell recalls on a time where he was
a police officer for the British Raj in Burma. The essay exposes his conflict with imperialism and
the the internal conflict between law and his moral conscience. Throughout the essay, Orwell
conveys that the imperialistic government is ineffective, abusive, and oppressive through the use
Imperialism to Orwell is ineffective because it only oppresses others and creates violence.
He describes it as, As for the job I was doing, I hated it more bitterly than I can perhaps make
clear. In a job like that you see the dirty work of the Empire at close quarters. (Orwell 1) then
continues to explain the dirty work as the wretched prisoners huddling in the stinking cages
of the lock-ups, the grey, cowed faces of the long-term convicts, the scarred buttocks of the men
who had been bogged with bamboos (Orwell 1) Obviously he feel very strong about the
abuse and violence that comes from imperialism, and he conveys this through diction that has a
harsh and negative connotation. Not only does his choice of words denote emotions to the reader,
but they also serve to provide metal pictures of the results of imperialism.
Although Orwell does not directly say it, but his complex choice of words, or diction,
convey that he not only dislikes the imperialism, but that he believes that it is hurtful to the
Burmese. Early in the essay, Orwell establishes his stance when he says, For at that time I had
already made up my mind that imperialism was an evil thing and the sooner I chucked up my job
and got out of it the better. (Orwell 1) where he calls imperialism evil implying that it does no
good.
incident with the elephant, he gains a true insight about imperialism. The rogue elephant had
became unrestrained when his mahout, or handler, was away. The elephant symbolizes
colonialism and specifically Burma, because the elephant is a peaceful animal, but was driven to
destruction and rebellion by its oppression and mistreatment from his handler. Similar to how the
Burmese are being controlled by the British. Orwell conveys this opinion through the use of
phrases like, theoretically--and secretly, of course--I was all for the Burmese and all against
their oppressors (Orwell 1). His attitude is direct, and fore evil showing who he sides with.
The essay proves to be an example on how complex diction can convey a strong tone, and
in this case opinion. Orwell feels strongly against imperialism and the involuntary action of
being oppressed. He expresses his feelings with a angry attitude through his choice of words, and
they convey the three main conflicts with imperialism, ineffectiveness, abusive, and oppressive.