Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
RESEARCH METHOD
Sample
Questionaire of Scientific
Interest
Pretest by using
multiple choice
questions
Posttest by using
multiple choice
questions
Data Analysis
(t-test)
Conclusion
Figure 3.1. The overview of research planning on the effect of guided inquiry
larning and science interest toward students learning outcome on
structure and function of plant tissue topic in grade XI science
MAN 1 Medan academic year 2017/2018.
The complete procedures begin from administration process due to have
permission to do the research in MAN 1 Medan. Then the class sample are chosen
by sampling process to determine experiment and control class. The procedures
detailed can be seen as follows:
1. Before the study began, first conduct a survey by using scientific
interest questionaire to experiment and control class.
2. Doing pretest to determine the samples based on their homogenity in
initial ability.
3. Giving ecosystem topic to students suitable with their class (different
learning treatment).
4. Preserving the condition of both classes remain the same through study
(time allocation in teaching, book using, etc) apart from treatment that
used.
5. Doing observation to the ongoing learning process by filling
observation sheet in experiment and control class.
6. Doing posttest to measure the final learning outcomes in experiment
and control class.
7. Scoring or evaluating the result of questionare, pretest, learning
observation sheet, and posttest.
8. Analyzing the statistical test for data normality and homogenity, then
continue to the statistical advance test.
9. Making the conclusion after obtaining the value which change
(increase or decrease) from statistical test.
1 Mengidentifikasi
macam-macam
jaringan berdasarkan
bentuk dan lokasinya
2 Membedakan struktur
jaringan tumbuhan
yang menyusun organ
tumbuhan
3 Mengidentifikasi ciri-
ciri utama berbagai
jenis jaringan
tumbuhan
4 Menjelaskan fungsi
berbagai jenis jaringan
tumbuhan.
5 Mengkaitkan sifat
totipotensi jaringan
tumbuhan dengan
teknik kultur jaringan
6 Menjelaskan prinsip
dasar kultur jaringan
7 Mengetahui peran
kultur jaringan dalam
kehidupan sehari-hari
3.6.2. Students Activity Instrument
Observation in the teaching and learning process will assess by using
students activities observation guidlines.
Where :
rxy = validity
N = number of students
X = item score
Y = total score
The calculation result of validity categorize to five ranks as follows:
0.000 < rxy 0.200 very low validity
0.210 < rxy 0.400 low validity
0.410 < rxy 0.600 enough validity
0.610 < rxy 0.800 high validity
0.810 < rxy 1.000 very high validity
To determine whether or not valid questions about the criteria have made.
If rcalculate > ttable, then the question is valid and vice versa (Sudjana in Lubis,
2016).
b. Reability Test
To determine reability test using Kuder-Richardson formula 20 (K-R 20).
The formulation can be seen below:
2
11=( )(1 )
1 2
Where:
r11 = reability of the instruments
k = the number of items
St2 = variance for the total score
Si2 = variance for item score
The reability of the insrtuments as follows :
0.00 < r11 0.20 very low
c. Difficulty Level
To measure difficulty of one question on test the formula used is a
difficulty index, as formulated : =
Where :
P = Difficulty Index
B = The number of students who can answer correctly
T = The total number of student participants in the tests.
After calculating difficulty level the result value be grouped as follows:
0.00 < P 0.30 difficult
0.31 < P 0.70 medium
0.71 < P 1.00 easy (Kunandar, 2015).
Where :
D = Discrimination index
J = The number of test participants
JA = The number of high group participants
JB = The number of low group participants
BA = Number of participants in the high group which ansewered correclty
BB = Number of participants in the low group which ansewered correctly
PA = The proportion of participants in the high group which answered
correctly
PB = The proportion of participants in the low group which answered
correctly
Classification of discrimination index after calculating the result:
0.00 < D 0.19 bad
0.20 < D 0.39 enaugh
0.40 < D 0.69 good
0.70< D 1.00 very good (Arikunto,2010).
3.7.2. Learning Motivation Data Analysis
To know students learning motivation value, formula used as follow:
= %