Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
based on sibling abundance data, rather than simply choosing the best sibling relationship for each age
and river, we use a technique that weights the forecasts for all potential predictor sibling models
according to how well they have performed in the past. While the best sibling relationship carries the
most weight in our forecasts for each stock-age group, retrospective analysis indicates that there is
useful information conveyed by other models (i.e. sibling models that include alternative age classes and
different combinations thereof), and that this information increases forecast accuracy.
In addition to sibling-based forecasts we have included other forecast model types due to their
superior performance in recent years. In four instances (Egegik 2.2, Igushik - 1.2 and 2.2, and Nushagak
2.2) we used auto-regressive integrated moving average models (ARIMA). ARIMA models generate
forecasts based on how well patterns in a time series of data predict future values. These models
consider the level of autocorrelation in the time series of returns for stock-age groups in addition to the
moving average of the forecast errors in prior years, and are independent of the information provided
by the abundance of sibling age classes. In addition to ARIMA models, in recent years we have increased
reliance on forecasts generated by ensemble models. Ensemble models simply average the range of
forecasts generated by all model types, under the assumption that both sibling regression and ARIMA
models provide predictive information. In four instances (Kvichak 2.3, Naknek 2.2, Egegik 1.2, and
Ugashik 1.2) an Ensemble model was selected as the best estimate for 2018.
The 2018 forecast of 47.6 million sockeye is 20% and 9% lower than the observed sockeye runs
in 2017 and 2016 respectively. However, this forecast is similar to both of those observed runs and the
2017 and 2016 forecast in that the forecast total results from relatively strong predictions across most
rivers and age classes (Figure 1). In most years with a forecast exceeding 40 million sockeye the overall
forecast is dominated by a single river and often a single age group (e.g. Kvichak or Egegik 2.2s),
however the 2018 forecast is based on a relatively even mix of production from a range of stocks and
age classes. The 2018 forecast of 47.6 million is significantly above the long-term (1960-2017) average
Bristol Bay run size of 33.3 million sockeye, and of this total we expect 47% 2-ocean sockeye and 53% 3-
ocean sockeye. Historically, the average range for weight of 2-ocean sockeye is 4.6-5.4 lbs and 6.4-7.5
lbs for 3-ocean sockeye.
Page 2 of 8
University of Washington - Alaska Salmon Program 16 November 2017
Table 1. 2018 pre-season forecast of the number of sockeye salmon in millions returning to Bristol Bay, Alaska by river system and age class.
AGES
Estimated Inshore
DISTRICT RIVER 1.2 1.3 2.2 2.3 TOTAL ESCAPEMENT S. PEN CATCH HARVEST
millions of fish
Egegik 1.09 2.55 3.01 3.02 9.67 1.40 0.28 7.99
Page 3 of 8
University of Washington - Alaska Salmon Program 16 November 2017
Table 2. 2018 pre-season Bristol Bay sockeye forecast in millions of pounds by fishing district and age class.
Inshore Harvest
lbs no. of fish
DISTRICT 1.2 1.3 2.2 2.3 (millions) (millions)
a
Nushagak 25.86 39.07 0.72 0.42 67.41 11.51
Page 4 of 8
University of Washington - Alaska Salmon Program 16 November 2017
Table 3. 2018 and 2017 preseason forecast of the number of sockeye salmon in millions returning to Bristol Bay, Alaska by river system, and actual returns of sockeye
salmon in millions by river system 2007-2017.
ACTUAL RETURNS
2017
2018 Forecast
RIVER Forecast (last year's) 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007
Kvichak 8.38 7.62 7.78 12.03 16.60 14.23 4.79 11.15 6.18 9.41 5.70 5.87 4.38
Naknek 5.81 6.10 6.51 5.44 4.82 5.91 2.35 3.38 5.11 5.82 4.66 6.52 9.05
Alagnak 3.70 3.48 4.80 5.16 12.45 0.89 2.49 2.60 2.52 2.64 2.57 6.16 4.43
Egegik 9.67 10.71 12.38 9.40 8.80 7.80 5.96 6.01 5.89 6.01 12.95 9.03 8.21
Ugashik 4.37 5.00 6.63 8.80 6.95 1.94 3.46 3.24 3.79 4.92 4.03 3.05 7.90
Wood 8.62 5.87 11.32 5.49 5.07 7.47 3.17 2.64 4.58 7.77 7.35 5.46 6.76
Nushagak 3.99 2.38 8.16 3.20 2.25 1.66 2.09 1.14 1.58 2.17 1.67 1.71 2.67
Igushik 2.13 1.15 1.23 1.95 1.65 0.98 0.74 0.50 1.20 1.38 0.95 3.43 1.83
Togiak 0.88 0.79 0.73 0.94 0.57 0.58 0.66 0.86 0.98 0.85 0.85 0.89 1.07
TOTALS 47.56 43.10 59.54 52.40 59.16 41.46 25.71 31.52 31.83 40.98 40.72 42.12 46.28
Page 5 of 8
University of Washington - Alaska Salmon Program 16 November 2017
Figure 1. Stock-specific comparison of the 2018 preseason forecast by age class (right panel) with observed run size by age
class 1970 - 2017 (left panel).
40
Kvichak Returns (millions)
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
0
2018 Forecast:
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Kvichak
8
Alagnak Returns (millions)
6
6
4
4
2
2
0
0
2018 Forecast:
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Alagnak
10
Naknek Returns (millions)
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
2
0
2018 Forecast:
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Naknek
Return Year
Page 6 of 8
University of Washington - Alaska Salmon Program 16 November 2017
25
Egegik Returns (millions)
20
20
15
15
10
10
5
5
0
0
2018 Forecast:
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Egegik
10
10
1.2 1.3 2.2 2.3
Ugashik Returns (millions)
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
2
0
0
2018 Forecast:
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Ugashik
2.5
Igushik Returns (millions)
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.0
0.0
2018 Forecast:
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Igushik
Return Year
Page 7 of 8
University of Washington - Alaska Salmon Program 16 November 2017
14
14
12 1.2 1.3 2.2 2.3
12
Wood Returns (millions)
10
10
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
2
0
0
2018 Forecast:
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Wood
8
Nushagak Returns (millions)
6
6
4
4
2
2
0
0
2018 Forecast:
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Nushagak
1.2
Togiak Returns (millions)
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
2018 Forecast:
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Togiak
Return Year
Page 8 of 8