Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Artifact #6
Tiffany Dukes
Karen White, a kindergartener teacher, denounced to both her students and their parents
that should would no longer be able to lead activity in any type of project of religious matters,
due to the fact that she was a Jehovahs Witness, she could no longer lead activities or participate
in projects that were religious in nature. This included holiday decorations, singing Happy
Birthday or reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. Unfortunately the parents disputed against Young
and the principal recommended she dismissal based on her ineffectively meeting the needs of her
students.
In the case Wisconsin v Yoder the court determined That in forcing a state compulsory
attendance law against Amish children after they had completed the eighth grade, infringed on
their freedom to exercise of religious rights (Wisconsin v Yoder, 1972) In similarity Yoder case
would argue Karen White, under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, has the right
to worship as she chooses because she is a Jehovah Witness and her religion does not permit her
to lead or participate in any activity that may be against her religious beliefs. Therefore the
school would be infringing on her free exercise of religion rights if they forced her to do
otherwise.
Another court case, West Virginia State Board of Education v Barnette, in which the
Board adopted a judgment which required students and teachers to stand and salute the flag
while reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in school. Unfortunately because a student failed to do
so, they were seen as insubordination and resulted in the suspension. West Virginia State
School Boards were determined according to the courts that their actions were unconstitutional,
Religion and Public Schools Dukes
due to the fact that as a Jehovah Witness, students are forbidden from honoring the flag (West
Virginia State Board of Education v Barnette, 1943). This is also true in regards to the defense of
Karen White. The principal advocating for dismissal of a teacher simply for not participating in
certain activities, one being the reciting of the Pledge of Allegiance would be unconstitutional
Furthermore, Whites principal recommended her dismissal centered on her notion that
Karen would no longer meet the needs of her students. Even though Young may not participate
in certain activities due to her of religion, does not mean she should is inadequate in the
classroom. In the court case, Florey v. Sioux Falls School District, the Court upheld that the
study and performance of religious songs, which includes Christmas carols, are constitutional if
their purpose is the advancement of students knowledge of societys cultural and religious
heritage (Florey v. Sioux Falls School District, 1980). In this case the courts could argue in the
principals defense. Stating that as long as the activities in the classroom show a purpose of the
advancement of the students knowledge of cultural and religious heritage, than Karen White
should be able to associate herself in such activities so that the students needs are met in an
educational manner. Further insuring that Karen will abstain from activities and projects because
In addition to, the court care Clever v. Cherry Hill Tp. Board of Education the Court
upheld that it is permissible for public schools to display religious holiday symbols in school
calendars as long as it is absent of denominational preference (Clever v Cherry Hill Tp. Bd. Of
Educ., 1993). The principal would appeal, as long as there are educational purposes which do not
appear to endorse religion within a holiday, Karen White should allow certain activities so that
she can productively accommodate the needs of the students. If the courts used this case they
Religion and Public Schools Dukes
would side with the principal because she wants to adequately meet the needs of her students
when pertaining to certain activities. She could argue that teachers should not exclude students
Last but not least, I believe that the principal was not justified in dismissing Karen based
on her ineffectively meeting the needs of students, due to the fact that she was simply exercising
her freedom of religion right. However, I do believe that necessary actions needed to take place
in order to ensure students were included in all activities and projects. Unfortunately, I believe
that the courts would side with the principal, arguing that the school infringed on Karen Whites
free exercise of religion rights by recommending her dismissal for disallowing activities that she
believe are religious in nature. I do believe that there should be an appropriate balance in the
classroom concerning certain activities so that both the teacher and the students needs are met.
References
Clever v Cherry Hill Tp. Bd. of Educ., 838 F. Supp. 929 (D. N.J. 1993).
Florey v Sioux Falls School District 49-5, 619 F.2d 1311 (8th Cir. 1980).
Religion and Public Schools Dukes
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943).