2017 ALDOT - FAA Consultant Workshop Slides

2017ALDOT&FAA
AERONAUTICS
CONSULTANTWORKSHOP
REIMBURSEMENTREQUESTS
JasonHare
GrantsManager
ALDOTAeronauticsBureau
ReimbursementRequestBasics
RejectionsAreNotABigDeal.
WeTriedToMakeThemEasyToCorrect
EveryoneMakesMistakes
ClarificationSolvesALotOfProblems
ItIsBetterToCorrectThingsEarly
MakeSureInvoicesShowTheCurrentRequest.
IfItIsCumulative,ShowCurrentPeriod(WhatIsToBePaidOnThisRequest)
HandwriteIfNecessary
ICannotWriteOnAnInvoice
ExecutedEngineeringAgreementsAreRequiredToApproveTheFirstReimbursementRequest.
ReimbursementRequestBasics
ForAdditionalServices,UseCurrentOverheadRates,LaborRates,andFCCM.
10%Profit
ShowManHoursBrokenOutWithBriefDescriptionOfWork
IfYouUseAMultiplier,ShowTheOverheadRate,FCCM,AndProfit
WatchThePercentageCompleteOnProjects.
AtOrAbove90%RequiresFAAApproval
CoordinateWithYourFAAProgramManagerOnRequiredDocuments
PeriodicallyCheckForReimbursementRequestsThatHaveNotBeenSubmittedOrRejected.
BackupDocumentation Invoices
MakeSureThatTheFAAAIPGrantNumberOrTheStateGrantNumberIsListedOnEach
SeparateInvoice.
MakeSureThatTheInvoiceNumberListedinARGOSAppearsOnTheInvoice.
MakeSureThatTheAmountEarnedAndTheAmountRetainedAppearOnTheInvoice.
BackupDocumentation Subconsultant
Invoices
MakeSureMileageRateIsAllowable.
CheckForUnallowable/IneligibleItems.
MakeSureFAAAIPGrantNumberOrStateGrantNumberIsListedOnEachInvoice.
BackupDocumentation Organization
AndPreparation
PleaseOrganizeandGroupBackupDocuments
MoreEfficient/LessTimeToReview
SummariesHelpIfThereIsALotOfInformation
PleaseExplainIfSomethingIsNotClearOrCouldCauseConfusion
IfBackupDocumentationIsSuppliedByOthers,PleaseConductAQuickReview
NoAlcoholListedOnInvoices
Retainage
RetainageAndStoredMaterialsWillBeLookedAtCloser.
RetainageWithholdingsandReleaseMustFollowTheStipulationsInTheContract.
SameWithLiquidatedDamages
CarefullyMonitorRetainageBalances,EspeciallyIfTheProjectIsMultiyear,Multiphase,Or
StretchesAcrossDifferentGrants.
2017
CONSULTANT
WORKSHOP
TOPICS
PLAN SUBMITTALS
PROJECT CHANGE ORDERS
FAA AC/5370-12B
PROJECT MANUALS AND CONTRACTS
RUNWAY MAINTENANCE IN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS

PLAN SUBMITTALS
50% SUBMITTALS
Email PDF plans
Copy of Engineers Design Report if required
90% SUBMITTALS
(1) set of full size plans
(1) copy of project manual
Engineers Estimate
No need for full size plans for projects such as fencing, seal coats, fuel farms etc.
CHANGE ORDERS
Copy ALDOT on all change order correspondence

FAA AC/5370-12B
Quality Management for Federally Funded
Airport Construction Project
Weekly Reports - Per the circular FAA Form 5370-1 or a form that provides
equivalent information must be submitted to the FAA
Per the circular a Construction Management Program (CMP) is required when

paving costs exceed $500,000
This items are already required so it will be EASY to COPY ALDOT on these
items
PROJECT MANUALS
Send ALDOT copies of Contract Documents including plans and specifications.

CIP & RUNWAY MAINTENANCE
If any runway/taxiway pavement was listed as poor or fair in the latest

inspection report then the CIP MUST include pavement maintenance
If pavement is listed in good condition it would still be good to show

pavement maintenance if applicable
Federal Aviation
Administration
FAA Airports Issues
Presented to: Alabama Consultants Workshop

April 27, 2017
By: FAA/Airports District Office
Jackson, MS
Alabama Team Introduction
By: Jeff Orr

Lead Engineer/Program Manager
FAA/Jackson ADO
Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 2

Administration
Rans Black 601-664-9892
Ryan Constans 601-664-9895
Luke Flowers 601-664-9898
Brian Hendry 601-664-9897
Wesley Mittlesteadt 601-664-9884
Kevin Morgan 601-664-9891
Jeff Orr 601-664-9885
Will Schuller 601-664-9883

Administration
12:15-12:20 Introductions Jeff Orr
12:20-12:45 AGIS, ALPs, Exhibit As, Environmental Issues, CATEXs, Brian Hendry
EAs
12:45-13:00 ACIP, Priorities, Revenue Producing Projects Ryan Constans
13:00-13:30 Engineering Contracts, CSPP/P&S Reviews, Quarterly Luke Flowers

Reports, Final Invoices, Closeouts
13:30-13:45 Break
13:45-14:15 Approach and Departure Surfaces, RPZ Protection, Airspace Kevin Morgan
Study Requirements
14:15-14:35 P-401, Minimum Thickness, Construction Management, Wesley Mittlesteadt
Testing Requirements, Lab Certification
14:35-14:50 P-601, Surface Treatments, New ACs Jeff Orr
14:50-15:00 Wrap Up, PDHs/CEUs, Training Feedback-Survey Dr. Eagerton

Frank Farmer
Jeff Orr

Administration
AGIS, ALP, Exhibit A,
Environmental Assessment,
CATEX
Community Planner
Alabama & Mississippi
Brian Hendry, RLA

brian.hendry@faa.gov
601-664-9897

Administration
AGIS Eligibility
AGIS in FAA Order 5100.38D, AIP Handbook
Engineering and architectural costs are only allowable if they are
necessary to complete an AIP eligible project
3-82 and Table 3-48: surveying and data collection for AGIS is
eligible when AGIS is required by an AIP funded project or a
Master Plan
Table E-1: obstruction surveys are eligible as stand-alone
system planning or master planning projects if the ADO
determines they are necessary and reasonable in scope
Table G-3: runway projects must be planned, designed, and
constructed in accordance with current FAA standards, including
object clearing of approach slopes
Appendix K: All NAVAIDs projects require AGIS surveys
Safety Critical

Administration
Aeronautical survey data collection
AC150/530016 AC150/530017 AC150/530018

Administration
AGIS (Airports Geographic Information System)
FYI: eALP program on hold.
Why AGIS
Data Standardization
Data Accuracy
Eliminate Redundancy
NGS Surveys, Engineering Surveys, OE/AAA, etc)
When AGIS
Development of Instrument Approach Procedures
Change Safety-Critical Data and/or Pt. 139 Airport
Runway Extension, Modify Runway Profile, Install/Relocate
NAVAID

Administration
Use of Existing Data
AC 150/5300-18B Chapter 4. Data Translation and
Use of Existing Data
Geospatial Data
Tied to NSRS (National Spatial Ref. System) via survey control
Meets AC 150/5300-16 requirements
Data Accuracy
Sponsors Responsibility
Confirm & Certify
Non-Safety Critical projects.
Case-by-Case Basis
More Efficient than new AGIS survey project.

Administration
Table 2-1 Survey Matrix

Administration
Data Submission
Upload Data to AGIS system
Website: https://airports-gis.faa.gov/public/index.html
ESRI Shape Files (Most Successful)
File Naming Defined in Appendix D
Autodesk DWG Files
Naming Defined in Chapter 5
MicroStation DGN Files
Final Project Report (Written document & supporting evidence)
Help Desk
Phone: 202-580-7505
Email: AGIS_HelpDesk@cghtech.com
Website: http://arp-helpdesk.isicns.com/browse/AGIS-2936
Your JAN ADO Community Planner

Administration
Airport Recycling, Reuse, &
Waste Reduction
FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 133
New or Updated Master Plans / ALPs required to address Solid
Waste Recycling.
GA thru Large Hub Airports
This Includes
Solid Waste Recycling Feasibility
Minimizing Solid Waste Generation
Operation and Maintenance Requirements
Waste Management Contract Review
Cost Savings Potential or Revenue Generation.
JAN-ADO Expectations

Administration
SARA: Service Animal Relief Area
August 2016 49 CFR 27.71 (h)
Airports with 10K or more Enplanements required to have at least one
located post security.
AC 150/5360-14A - Currently Draft form only.
Denver Intl Airport Jacksonville Intl Airport

$500,000
Administration
National Historic Preservation Act
of 1966
Congress Mandated Federal Agencies to Consider
Historic Properties During Project Planning.
Provide ACHP (Advisory Council on Historic Preservation)
opportunity to Comment.
Goal: ID Historic Properties Possibly Affected by
Project.
SHPO, Tribal, Local Govt., State Govt., Native Hawaiian
Alabama Historic Commission New Policy
Require Federal Agency initiate Section 106 Consultation process.

Administration
Section 106 Process

Administration
Environmental Assessment or
CATEX
Order 5050.4B - NEPA Implementing Instructions for
Airport Actions - April 28, 2006
Order 1050.1F - Environmental Impacts: Policies &

Procedures July 16, 2015
FAA policy for compliance with NEPA & Implementing
regulations issued by Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ).
Order spells out details of FAA guidance.

Administration
CATEX
Documented CATEX (checklist) SOP 5.00 October 1,
2014
FAA Order 5050.4B, Chapter 6, Section 600
Categories of actions that normally do not individually or
cumulatively have significant adverse effects on the human
environment and which have been found (by federal agency) to
have no such effect.
Federal agency must consider extraordinary circumstances in
which a normally excluded action may have a significant
environmental effect.
FAA Order 1050.1F, Chapter 3, Section 3-1.1
Category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have
a significant effect on human environment and for which, neither
an EA nor EIS is required.

Administration
Environmental Assessment
Order 1050.1F, 3-1.2 Actions Normally Requiring
Levels of
CATEX EA EIS Review,
When proposed action does not normally require EIS and

Not within scope of CATEX, but there are one or more extraordinary
circumstances (see para. 5-2 Extraordinary Circumstances) ..may
have significant environmental impact..
Acquisition of land greater than 3 acres for, construction of, new

office bldgs. & similar FAA facilities.
Establish new FAA housing, sanitation systems, fuel storage/dist.
systems and power source/dist. Systems.

Administration
Actions Normally Requiring Environmental Assessment
Contd
Establish or construct air traffic control centers/towers
Establish or relocate ILS, (ALS - off airport)
Establish or construct air traffic control centers/towers
New Runway at Existing Airport not located in MSA
Projects with Potential to Increase Off-Airport Noise
Commercial Space Launch/Reentry License
Authorization to exceed Mach 1
Land Acquisition associated with above items.
EA Short Form - when impacts expected to be

insignificant but cannot be excluded and detailed
EA inappropriate.

Administration
Standard Procedure for FAA
Review & Approval of ALPs
Limited to ALP Review & Approval.
Subject to Safety Management System (SMS)
Checklist developed for every size & complexity.
Tailored to individual reqs of airport under study.
Coordinate scope in advance.
Concur on proposed cost prior to start.
Not intended to describe every ALP action.
Include only elements to meet sponsors needs.
Some items Not Applicable.

Administration
ARP SOP 2.00 October 1, 2013 primary content is:
Instructive Review Checklist (Appendix A)
Approval letters (Appendix B)
General ALP Process Chart (Appendix C).
Submittal to FAA to include:
Any required narrative report.
ALP set of plans.
Completed review checklist (reviewed by preparer).
FAA to initiate circulation via OE/AAA system.

Administration
No airspace review or narrative report required when solely
documenting as-built conditions.
New or updated ALPs require FAA / airspace review and
narrative report.
FAA answer questions & provide guidance.
FAA distribute finalized ALP sets.

Administration
ALP Requirements & Objectives
Required by Statute to be updated.
Grant Assurance No. 29 obligates airport sponsor to keep
ALP and to receive FAA approval of any ALP update,
revision, or modification.
Any proposed AIP or PFC funded projects must be on
approved ALP.
AIP Handbook:
A current ALP depicting proposed projects and has FAA approval
from the standpoint of safety, utility and efficiency of the airport
shall be required before development project approved

Administration
Exhibit A
Standard Operating Procedure
ARP SOP 3.00 October 1, 2013
Establish uniform process to review & approve Exhibit A
Limited to review and acceptance of Exhibit A
Elements that will assist in ID of property only
Content includes Exhibit A Airport Inventory Map Review Process
Chart (Appendix A) and Review Checklist (Appendix B)
Airport Property Map is not a substitute for Exhibit A unless it is
prepared in accordance with AC 150/5100-17, Land Acquisition and
Relocation Assistance for AIP Projects.

Administration
Guidance from AC150/5100-17
Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance - 11/7/2005

Figure 1-2. Exhibit A Property Inventory Map
The Exhibit A property map must be submitted as part of the
project application.
The primary intent is to identify all land that is designated
airport property and to provide an inventory of all parcels that
make up the airport.
It is not an Airport Layout Plan (ALP) and, therefore, should be
limited to those elements, which will assist in the identification
of property only.

Administration
The Exhibit A must conform to standard drafting
requirements and should contain:
ID of outside airport property boundary.
All property parcels of the entire airport shown and numbered.
Parcels that were once airport property.
Parcel information
Grantee (selling owner)
Type of interest acquired
Acreage
Public land record references such as book & page
Date of recording.

Administration
Requirements Contd:
FAA project number if acquired under a grant
Surplus Property Transfer or AP-4 Agreement if applicable; and
type of easement (clearing, navigation, utility, ROW, etc.)
Date of FAA approval if released
Purpose of acquisition (current aeronautical, noise
compatibility, future development)
Current use / interim use / pending development.
RPZs
Runways
Building Restriction Lines
OFAs

Administration
Requirements Contd
Show magnetic and true north arrows.
If the Exhibit A is being submitted as part of a land acquisition
project, the parcels being acquired must also me shown.
The Exhibit A must be dated and amended whenever there is
a change to any airport property.

Administration
Regulations, Policy and Guidance
FAA Advisory Circular 150/5100-17, Fig. 1-2
FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-18B Section 2.4
FAA Advisory Circular 150/5070-6B, Airport Master Plans,
Paragraph 1002 (10)
Grant Assurances 4, 5, 29
FAA Order 5100.38C AIP Handbook, Para. 353, 500(a), 1010(a),
1031(b)(10), and 1313(b)
FAA Order 5190.6B, Compliance Handbook, Paragraph 7.19,
22.14
FAA Program Guidance Letter 08-02 Management of Acquired
Noise Land
FAA Order 5190.2R List of Airports Affected by Agreements with
the Federal Government

Administration
Exhibit A Requirements &
Objectives
Sponsor obligated to submit & maintain accurate Exhibit A
when applying for federal grants.
Indicate how land was acquired, funding source, and if land
was conveyed as Federal surplus or Government Property.
Show all dedicated airport property regardless of funding
type used to acquire that property.
AIP, State, Local, Etc.
Land shown constitutes federally obligated land for
compliance under terms & covenants of grant agreement.
FAA consent required to delete land described and shown.

Administration
Objectives
Submit as part of grant application when requesting AIP
funds for land acquisition or development projects.
Reference previous Exhibit A if still current.
Update Exhibit A if:
Acquiring land.
Acquiring land under PFC program.
Releasing or disposing airport property.

Administration
Objectives
Include land acquired for noise compatibility.
Large airports may reference separate Noise Land
Inventory Map.
Noise land to be shown to document airport ownership and
referenced to parcel #s on Exhibit A.
Changes to Exhibit A to incorporate accepted Noise
Inventory & Reuse Plan.

Administration
Objectives
Complete Exhibit A:
Checklist (from Appendix B in SOP).
Plan sheet(s) including items identified on checklist.
Backup documentation (land / legal descriptions, sponsor
certifications or title options if needed.

Administration
Exhibit A Review Checklist

Administration
JAN ADO Implementation of SOP
Item 3 of checklist will not be required for land parcels
acquired before Oct 1, 2013.
New Exhibit A will require the following:
Detailed property description for parcels acquired after Oct 1,
2013
Provide each parcel description as an attachment to Exhibit A
New parcels should be described with the following:
Metes and bounds, township/range/section, lot and block,
plat, or other appropriate property description

Administration
JAN ADO Implementation of SOP
Item 8(h) - Bearing and distance on all airport property
lines:
ADO would like to have this information if cost is reasonable
Required on case by case basis

Administration
Questions
JAN ADO Community Planner
Brian Hendry, RLA
brian.hendry@faa.gov
601-664-9897
Wrong DAWGS!
Administration
AIP Project Initiation and
Application Process
By: Ryan Constans

Program Manager

Administration
Airport Capital Improvement Plan
Most critical step! Develop and maintain a
prioritized and realistic list of planned development
at airport.
Help us help you. Provide as much notice as
possible for high dollar projects requiring
discretionary or state apportionment funds.
FY2018 FY2019
FY2017 FY2020-FY2021

Administration
FAA Order 5100-39A: AIRPORTS CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN
This order requires ADO to plan and prioritize
projects for the upcoming fiscal years. Relies
heavily on sponsor input.
In awarding AIP funds to sponsors of airports, the
FAA has always emphasized use on the highest
priority project.
The FAA uses the National Priority Rating system
as one tool for prioritizing airport development.

Administration
Plan for project phasing if necessary.

Reasons for phasing include environmental
requirements, complex design requiring
ATO coordination, or funding limitations
requiring completion over multiple grants.

Administration
Present
Airport: Generic Alabama Airport Airport Sponsor: ARC: Future ARC:
Sponsor
Contact: Tele. Ph # E-mail: Date Submitted:
Consultant
Contact: Tele. Ph # E-mail:
Project Description & Cost Estimate
Cost Allocation $
Proposed
Project Sponsor
Calendar Project Location on Estimated Total
Project Description Identification in Priority Federal Sponsor
Year to ALP Cost of Project State Participation
ALP/MP Number Participation Participation
Begin Project
Federally Funded Projects 90.0% 5.0% 5.0%

2017 Runway Remarking yes 1 $ 50,000 $ 45,000 $ 2,500 $ 2,500
2018 Land Acquisition & Obstruction Removal yes 2 $ 150,000 $ 135,000 $ 7,500 $ 7,500
2019 Apron Expansion yes 3 $ 300,000 $ 270,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000
2020 $ - $ - $ -
2021 Hangar Construction yes 4 $ 500,000 $ 450,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000
$ - $ - $ -
Participation Totals $ 1,000,000 $ 900,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000
State Funded Projects 50.0% 50.0%

$ - $ -
Participation Totals $ - $ - $ -
Note: Attach additional sheets as necessary to fully describe projects or to add information needed for a full understanding of project scope, location and costs.

Administration
Revenue Producing Projects
Revenue Producing Aeronautical Support Facilities.
Per 49 USC 47102(24), fuel farms, hangar buildings,
self-service credit card aeronautical fueling systems, air
plane wash racks, major rehabilitation of a hangar
owned by a sponsor, or other aeronautical support
facilities that the Secretary determines will increase the
revenue producing ability of the airport.

Administration
Revenue Producing Projects
Non-primary entitlement funds only.

Sponsor must certify airside needs are met.
Clear approach, no 20:1 obstructions indicated on
5010
Pavement condition good or better on 5010
Sponsor agrees it will not seek AIP discretionary grant funds for the
airside needs of the airport for the two fiscal years following the
fiscal year in which this grant is issued.

Administration
Preapplications
Preapplications for FY18 projects will be due to
ALDOT no later than November 15, 2017.
ALDOT and FAA request that every sponsor submit
a 3-5 year CIP with your preapplication and include
a description with details for each project.
Make sure engineers estimate for project meets
available funds.

Administration
Submittals
SF 424 (Application for Federal Assistance)

version: 8/31/2016
http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/forms
Project description and justification for each
project.
Engineering worksheet (5100-4) with separate
costs for each project.
Project sketch showing each item of work.

Administration
Form 5100-4

Administration
Plan for rest of FY2017
ADO / ALDOT met in December to finalize
funding allocations.
ADO has sent Tentative Allocation (TA) letters
for most projects.
Plan to complete design, advertise and open
bids by summer 2017. Will be described on TA
letter.
Submit FINAL application SF-424 that is based
on bids. Include signed sponsor certification
forms.

Administration
Ryan Constans
Program Manager / Civil Engineer
ryan.j.constans@faa.gov
601-664-9895

Administration
Engineering Contracts,
CSPP/P&S Reviews,
Quarterly Reports, Final
Invoices, Closeouts
By: Luke Flowers
Program Manager

Administration
Engineering and Architectural Contracts
From Airport Improvement Program

Handbook. Order 5100.38D

Administration
Engineering and Architectural Costs

Administration
Scope of Services
The scope of service(s) must be sufficiently detailed so that the consultant can make a reasonable fee estimate (see Appendix
E). Although the scope of service(s) will vary from project to project (see samples in Appendix C), the following items are typical
of those that should be considered in developing the scope of services:
1. List of meetings the consultant is expected to attend.
2. Design schedule.
3. Special services required.
4. Complexity of design.
5. Safety and operational considerations.
6. Environmental considerations.
7. Survey and geotechnical testing requirements.
8. Sponsor representation services during construction.
9. Quality control during construction.
10. Preparation of forms, letters, documents, and reports.
11. Airport Layout Plan updates.
12. Property map preparation.
13. Quality control during design.
14. Coordination with other consultants and agencies.
15. Deliverables.
16. Data and material furnished by the sponsor.
9/30/2014 AC 150/5100-14E
2-14
17. Testing and commissioning requirements.
18. City/county requirements.
19. Number of bid packages.
20. Complexity of construction phasing to minimize impacts on airport operations.
21. Public Outreach.

Administration
Review of CSPP
Required for all on-airfield projects
- Reference AC 150/5370-2F, Operational Safety on Airports
During Construction
o Part 139 airports require more detail
OE/AAA Airspace Study
- Allow minimum 45 days for coordination
- Complete with FAA determination prior to pre-construction
conference
- On Airport & Off Airport

Administration
Notice of Construction On Airport
It is imperative that all new structures that are planned to be
constructed on airport be studied to determine effect to airspace.
7460-1 must be filed no later than 45 days prior to allow time for
review and determination.
Failure to provide these notices of construction is a violation of
grant assurances as required by Order 5190.6B - FAA Airport
Compliance Manual
Chapter 20 of this Order, Compatible Land Use and Airspace
Protection, provides additional information relating to Grant
Assurance 20, Hazard Removal and Mitigation, and obstruction
protection.

Administration
Review of P&S
https://www.faa.gov/airports/engineering/media/Construction-
Plans-Specifications-AIP-Funded-Projects.pdf
Purpose of Review
- AIP Eligibility
- Within approved scope of work
- FAA design and construction standards
- Federal Contract Provisions
- Safety and Phasing Plans in accordance with FAA standards
NOT a quality control check
NOT a Modification of Standards (MOS) review

Administration
What to Send to your Program
Manager PRIOR to Review
Need to include:
- Consultant Scope of Work
- Engineering Design Report
- Construction Safety and Phasing Plan (CSPP)
- Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for CSPP
- Checklist also in Appendix 3 AC 150/5370-2F

Administration
When does this review take place?
Minimum 90% Plans and Specifications
Program Manager may request earlier or multiple reviews
Need to include:
- Technical Specifications and Front End Documents
- Construction Drawings
- Construction Safety and Phasing Plan
FAA review level based on review matrix in following link:
http://www.faa.gov/airports/engineering/media/Construction-
Plans-Specifications-AIP-Funded-Projects.pdf
Coordinate with your Program Manager

Administration
Review Levels
Sponsor Certification
General Review + Executed Sponsor Certification
- Review for ineligible items
- Consistent with ALP
- Geometric Standards
- Markings/Signage/Lights/Navaids
- CSPP in Bid
- Federal Contract Provisions
- Federal Wage Rates
- DBE Participation

Administration
Review Levels
Full Review + Executed Sponsor Certification
- Typical Sections
- Longitudinal/Transverse Grades
- Width Meets Runway Design Code
- Drainage Plan
- OFA Clear of Objects not Fixed by Function
- Signage Plan
- Lighting spacing, height, location, and color
- Navaids

Administration
Federal Contract Provisions
https://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/procurement/federal_contract_provisions/

Administration
Required Contract Provisions for AIP and Sponsors
(updated 6/29/16)

Administration
Quarterly Reports
The sponsor must submit a Quarterly Performance Report for each fiscal
(1)quarter until the non-construction project is completed.
The sponsor must submit each Quarterly Performance Report within 30
(2)days of the end of the quarter. Sponsors must not submit the Quarterly
Performance Reports in batches or at the end of the project.
A sample format for the Quarterly Performance Report is provided in
(3)Appendix V. At a minimum, the report must include the following items:
(a) A comparison of proposed objectives to actual accomplishments.
(b) Reasons for any slippage or lack of accomplishment in a given area.
(c) Impacts on other AIP-funded projects.
(d) Impacts to projects funded by PFC, other FAA programs, or the
sponsor.
(e) Identification and explanation of any anticipated cost overruns.

Administration
Final Invoices
Consultant invoice must show a total
amount of fees billed for the entire project
and marked as final
Contractors invoice use AIA Document or
similar and contain following:
the original contract amount
change orders
total contract sum to date
total earned less retainage
less previous certificates for payment
current payment due
final balance plus retainage

Administration
Grant Closeouts
Include a summary invoice with each and
every draw of funds from your AIP grant.
Grant funds should be drawn in the
percentage that the grant states, 90% or
95%. Invoices should reflect this.
Grant Payments are automatic in Delphi
until you exceed 90% draw of total grant
funds. After the sponsor has drawn 90%,
the FAA Program Manager must review
each pay request.

Administration
AIP Closeout
A Standard Operation Procedure (SOP) is

being developed in FY17, which will contain
a Closeout Documentation Review Checklist
developed from the requirements in AIP
Handbook
FAA Order 5100.38D

Administration
AIP Closeout Documentation
What documents do we need to Closeout an AIP Grant?
Engineering contract and associated amendments
Bid Tabs
Settlement Agreements (Land) / Proof of Title
Summary of Change Orders
Summary of Test Reports
Weekly Inspection Reports Provide weekly throughout const.
Final Inspection Report (Form 5110-17)
Before and After Photos
Final Invoices (Contracts more than $1,000)
Statement and Distribution of Project Costs
Final Form 271
SF-425 Federal Financial Report

Administration
Requirements for payment within the last 10% of
the grant
Per FAA policy, the ADO has the option to approve payment requests for a portion of the
remaining 10% for a project that the ADO determines is substantially complete and meets all
of the requirements in Table 5-20 are met.
Requirements include
a. The sponsor has submitted all required documentation to the ADO, including the contract section,
evidencing that the sponsor has found the project substantially complete per the contract
requirements.
b. The ADO must determine that the project is substantially complete. Substantial completion is
generally a defined term in a contract and is the stage of the project when work is sufficiently
complete in accordance with the Contract Documents so that the Owner can occupy or use the
project for its intended purpose. Per the contract, the substantial completion date typically triggers:
retainage release, the warranty period, determination of any actual or liquidated damaged, the start
of the statute of limitations, and related limitations.
c. The sponsor is in the nominal risk category.
d. The project results in a complete, usable unit of work.
e. The ADO has determined that the request for payment does not exceed 97.5% of the federal
share of the projects estimated allowable costs.
f. The ADO has determined that the request for payment conforms to the requirements in the latest
version of the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Grant Payment and Sponsor Financial Reporting
Policy, maintained by APP-520.

Administration
Payment Request Frequency >12months
If a sponsor has not submitted a payment

request for more than 12 months, it is FAA
policy that the ADO must notify the sponsor in
writing of this delinquency and request the
sponsor to submit a payment request or, if
applicable, close the grant.
If the sponsor is unable to submit a payment
request or close the grant, the sponsor must
provide the ADO with the reason for the delay
and the sponsors proposed resolution.
Administration
Luke Flowers
Luke.Flowers@faa.gov
601-664-9898

Administration
Airport Design
Protecting Runways
Kevin Morgan
Kevin.L.Morgan@faa.gov
601-664-9891

Administration
Protected Surfaces
Airport Sponsor Responsibilities
Grant Assurances
19 Operation and Maintenance
Safe and Serviceable condition
20 Hazard Removal
Mitigate existing hazards and prevent future hazards
21 Compatible Land Use
Zoning and restrictions for adjacent land use
29 Airport Layout Plan
Up to date plan and profile of obstacles

Administration
Protected Surfaces
Obstacle Free Zone (OFZ)
Runway Safety Area (RSA)
Runway Object Free Area (ROFA)
Taxiway Safety Area (TSA)
Taxiway Object Free Area (TOFA)
Runway Visibility Zone (& BRL)
Runway Protection Zone (RPZ)
Approach/Departure Surfaces (OCS)

Administration
Protecting
Runway Protection Zone

Administration
Runway Protection Zone (RPZ)
2-Dimensional Surface (i.e. no
elevation)
Dimensions based on aircraft
approach category and visibility
minimums
Protection of people and property on
the ground.
Airport owners should own the
property under the runway approach
and departure areas to at least the
limits of the RPZ.
Desirable to clear the entire RPZ of all
above-ground objects.
Airport owners should maintain the
RPZ clear of all facilities supporting
incompatible activities.

Administration
Interim Guidance on RPZ
New or Modified Land Uses
Must provide an alternative analysis on
incompatible land uses entering the limits of a
RPZ as the result of:
An airfield project (e.g., runway extension,

runway shift)
A change in the critical design aircraft that
increases the RPZ dimensions
A new or revised instrument approach
procedure that increases the RPZ
dimensions
A local development proposal in the RPZ
(either new or reconfigured)

Administration
Current RPZ Guidance
Sponsor / project proponent is responsible for
alternatives analysis document
FAA can provide guidance only due to risk implications
FAA role is to work with the sponsor to be sure they

identify & document a full range of alternatives that
Avoids introducing incompatible land uses in the RPZ
Minimizes impact of use in the RPZ
Mitigates risk to people & property on the ground

Administration
Land uses within a RPZ that require coordination with HQ
Buildings & structures
Recreational land uses
Transportation facilities (i.e. rail, roads & parking lots)
Fuel storage facilities (above & below ground)
Hazardous material storage (above & below ground)
Wastewater treatment facilities
Above-ground utility infrastructure & any type of solar panel
installations

Administration
Documentation developed by the Sponsor RPZ
Alternatives Analysis (RPZ AA)
Description, exhibit & discussion of each alternative

Cost estimate
Practicability assessment (i.e. feasibility of the alternative in
terms of cost, constructability & other factors)
Identification of preferred alternative that would meet the
project purpose & need, while minimizing risk associated with
the location within the RPZ

Administration
Protecting
Approach/Departure
Surfaces

Administration
Responsibilities
for FAA and
Airport Sponsors
for Protecting
Approach and
Departure
Surfaces

Administration
Approach and Departure Surfaces
Which surfaces should you protect?
Design Surfaces
ALDOT State Inspection Licensing
Part 77 Imaginary Surfaces
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS) Surfaces
Do you have obstructions?
ALP or AGIS Obstruction Survey
ALDOT Annual Inspection Report
How do you protect?
Land Acquisition
Easements

Administration
Runway Design Standards
Runway Design Standards
Runway ends
Clear approach and departure surfaces
Obstacles within surfaces may impact approaches
and loss of night operations
Obstacle clearing

Administration
Approach/Departure Surfaces

Administration
Departure Surface

Administration
Departure Surface
40 to 1 slope
Penetrations to this surface may result in non-standard climb rate and/or
non-standard (higher) departure minimums, or reduction in the length of
the takeoff distance available
Note: If one runway at

an airport has an
instrument approach
then ALL runway ends
at that airport are
evaluated for instrument
departures

Administration
Terminal Instrument Procedures
Surfaces (TERPS)

Administration
TERPs Surfaces
20:1 Approach 40:1 Departure

3,400 6,466
10,000
10,200
400
1,000
200
14 14
32 32

Administration
ALDOT State Licensing 20:1 Approach Surface
General Aviation Airports Inspected Annually
450
1000
250
14
32

Administration
16,000
Part 77 Approach Standards 40:1
40,000
3,500 4,000
34:1 34:1 50:1
1,250 1,500 2,000
10,000
20:1 20:1 20:1
5,000
250 500 500 500 1000 1000
14 14
14 14 14 14
32 32 32 32
32 32
A(V) B(V) A(NP) C D PIR

Administration
Protecting Approach and
Departure Surfaces
Current Airport Sponsor Responsibilities
Comply with Grant Assurances
Operate Safely
Maintain clear surfaces
Keep ALP current and identify hazard disposition
Control land use
Plan for removal or mitigation of hazards

Administration
Obstruction Evaluation / Airport
Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA)

Administration
On-Airport Proposals
ALL proposed development on a public use

airport is subject to an airport airspace analysis,
regardless of funding source!
Airport sponsors/proponents must submit

all FAA Form 7460-1 electronically in the
OE/AAA website

Administration
Define On Airport
Property that is owned
by the airport
Not always inside airport

perimeter fence
OE/AAA property line

may not match Exhibit A
Airport Owned Property

Administration
Common Types of
On-Airport Airspace Studies
Notice of Proposed Construction (Form 7460-1)

Construction Safety & Phasing Plan (CSPP)
Airport Layout Plan (ALP)
Modification of Standard (MOS)
Solar Facilities
Hazardous Wildlife Attractants
Other items as necessary

Administration
Permanent vs Temporary
Proposals
PERMANENT TEMPORARY
ALP Update No ALP Update
7460-1 contains no length of time 7460-1 contains length of time
Buildings, Antennas, Navaids, Cranes, Equipment, Batch Plants,
Aprons, Fences, etc Staging Areas, etc.

Administration
Notice of Proposed
Construction or Alteration
Permanent Proposals
Horizontal Construction (one study)
Combine construction and safety plan into one submission
Vertical Construction (two separate studies)
Submit proposed permanent construction
Submit construction safety and phasing plan (CSPP)
Temporary Proposals
Equipment for permanent proposals
Includes other activities such as special events
Submissions
Coordinate with Program Manager
Allow a minimum 45 days for review and coordination

Administration
Construction Safety Phasing Plans (CSPP)

Administration
Kevin Morgan
Kevin.L.Morgan@faa.gov
601-664-9891

Administration
P-401 Minimum Thickness, Construction
Management, Testing Requirements, Lab
Certification
By: Wes Mittlesteadt

Program Manager
FAA/Jackson ADO

Administration
Minimum HMA Thickness
AC 150/5320-6F & 150/5370-10G

P-401 & P-403:
Milling:
Removal of entire layer or leave at least 2 of HMA.
Remaining pavement structure must be able to support the
milling and all other construction equipment required.
Placement:
Gradation 1 (3/4 inch nMax): 3 inches

Administration
Quality Control (QC) Testing
Contractor provided testing

AC 150/5370-10G
General Provisions
Section 100 Contractor Quality Control Program
Contractor to establish a necessary level of control to:
Produce acceptable quality materials.
Provide sufficient information to ensure requirements of
specifications can be met.
Allow Contractor as much latitude as possible to develop
their own standard of control.

Administration
Quality Control (QC) Testing
AC 150/5370-10G
Contractors QC Program
Must be reviewed and approved in writing by the Engineer
prior to the Notice to Proceed.
Recommend submittal for review at least 5 days prior to
preconstruction conference.
Section 100 Contractor Quality Control Program
Paving projects over $500,000 shall have a QC/QA workshop
with Engineer, Contractor, subcontractors, testing
laboratories, and Owners representative at start of
construction.

Administration
Quality Assurance (QA) Testing
Engineer/Owner provided testing

AC 150/5370-10G
The official testing laboratories of the Owner or such
other laboratories as may be designated by the
Engineer. Also referred to as Engineers
Laboratory or Quality Assurance Laboratory
The only test results allowed for material acceptance
and payment determination.

Administration
Construction Management Plan
What is a CMP?
A plan that should detail the measures and
procedures to be used to comply with the quality
control provisions of the construction contract,
including, but not limited to, all quality control and
acceptance tests required by the Sponsor Certified
Specifications for the particular project.

Administration
When are CMPs required?

Total pavement construction value over $500,000
ADO has option of requiring plan for lower dollar
value pavement projects.
Paragraph 5-33 in FAA Order 5100.38D
Submit plan to ADO Program Manager at least 10
working days prior to start of construction.
Recommend diligent coordination with Contractor regarding
scheduled delivery of Contractors Quality Control Program
so that it can be added to CMP.

Administration
What is considered pavement construction?

Consult with your Program Manager.
Generally:
Surface
P-501 (PCC); P-401/P-403/P-601 (HMA)
Base/Subbase
P-401/P-403 (HMA)
P-301/P-304 (HMA/PCC)
P-306 (PCC/HMA-with FAA approval)
P-208/P-209/P-219 (Aggregate)
P-154 (Uncrushed Aggregate)
Subgrade

Administration
What is included in CMP?

Project
Information/Introduction
Date/Location
Project Name
AIP Project Number
Prepared For & By
Personnel & Responsibilities

Administration
What is included in CMP? (Continued)

Inspection Procedures and Frequencies
Surveying and grade control
Daily reporting by Contractor and Consulting Engineer
Submittal Process
List of submittals required for review.
Show process for review and approval of submittals.
How will approved submittals be checked against materials
provided/incorporated into the project?

Administration

Quality Control Testing
Recommend incorporation of Contractors QC Program per
AC 150/5370-10G Section 100 Contractor Quality Control
Program
Acceptance Testing
List each specification item, associated ASTM/AASHTO
test to be performed and frequency of test.
Flow chart showing responsibility between Contractor,
Contractors Testing Lab (Quality Control) and
Engineer/Sponsors Testing Laboratory (Quality Assurance)
List pay factors for each specification.

Administration

Administration

Daily Reports
Date, weather conditions, brief summary of work performed,
number of workers on site, type and amount of major
equipment being utilized, running total of working/calendar
days used, significant directives/communication with
Contractor, Summary of QA tests performed that day.
Weekly Reports
FAA Form 5370-1, Construction Progress and Inspection
Report
Coordinate with Program Manager for submission frequency
http://www.faa.gov/forms/index.cfm/go/document.informa
tion/documentID/186168

Administration

Administration

Testing Summary
Address how individual test results from QC and QA will be
collected and summarized for FAA review at closeout or
upon request.
Must contain
A summary of all tests (QC & QA) by pay item and lot
number
Highlighted failed or reduced pay results
http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_
Circular/Sample-Construction-Management-
Program.pdf

Administration
Laboratory Accreditation
Who, What & When?

ASTM D3666 Standard Specification for Minimum
Requirements for Agencies Testing and Inspecting
Road and Paving Materials
Contractors laboratory used to develop job mix formula
(JMF) shall be accredited.
P-401/P-403/P-601
Quality Assurance (QA)/Engineers Laboratory performing
acceptance sampling and testing shall be accredited.
P-401/P-403/P-601
Contractors laboratory used during construction shall meet
the requirements of ASTM D3666.

Administration
How to determine if a laboratory is

accredited?
Most common accreditation is AASHTO re:source
(formerly AMRL)
http://www.aashtoresource.org/
Search by Laboratory Name/State/City/Scope/Standard

Administration

Administration
Scenario
Asphalt contractor/subcontractor does not have a
laboratory that is accredited per ASTM D3666. Can
they bid on airport work?
YES
JMF is performed by a laboratory accredited per ASTM
D3666.
QA laboratory/Engineers laboratory is accredited per
ASTM D3666 and certifies in a report that the plant
laboratory would meet the requirements of ASTM D3666
including all necessary equipment, materials, calibrations,
and current reference standards.

Administration
P-401/P-403 Reminders
Job Mix Formula (JMF)

Must be performed by accredited laboratory per
ASTM D3666.
Engineer to review and approve in writing prior to
production.
Marshall or Gyratory Method
Mix designs that are not dated or which are from a prior
construction season shall not be accepted.
Aggregate
Free of ferrous sulfides, such as pyrite.
Durability requirements
Sand equivalent value

Administration
Laydown Plan
Prior to placement of HMA, the Contractor shall
provide for Engineer approval.
Goal is to minimize number of cold joints & ensure
there is a plan for proper joint offset between lifts.
1 longitudinal joint offset
10 transverse joint offset
Test Section
Less than 3,000 tons, the Engineer, with FAAs
consent, will determine if required.

Administration
Longitudinal Joint
A longitudinal joint is created when two lanes of
HMA are placed adjacent to each other.
Joint testing is required for the Lot of HMA placed adjacent
to the previously placed HMA material regardless of
time/date of placement or Lot ID.
Joint Cutback
Exposed more than 4 hours, surface cooled less
than 175F or is irregular/uncompacted/defective.
Cut back 3-6 inches and tack coat clean vertical
face.

Administration
Administration
Wes Mittlesteadt
wesley.mittlesteadt@faa.gov
601-664-9884

Administration
P-601
Surface Treatments
New Advisory Circulars
By: Jeff Orr

Lead Engineer/Program Manager
FAA/Jackson ADO

Administration
P- 601 Asphalt Paving
Golden Triangle Regional (GTR) Airport
(Apron Overlay Project)
- Reasons the industry developed a Fuel Resistant PMA

- Brief History of successful FR PMA at airports
- P-601 Specifications highlights
- Potential pros/cons of FR PMA

Administration
Why Fuel Resistant PMA?
Airfield pavements experience fuel and hydraulic oil spills

Most common at fueling operations, queuing
Softens AC, causes raveling, rutting, and asphalt cement stripping
Coal tar sealers most commonly used to protect HMA

Can be highly effective
Different coefficient of thermal expansion (cracks in coating)
May contain carcinogenic PAH chemicals
Use of coal tar sealer banned in some locations

Administration
Fuel Resistant PMA Usage
International
First use: Kuala Lumpur Intl Airport (Malaysia) 1996
Cairo, Egypt (1997); Aden, Yemen (2000); St Maarten (2001)
All projects report excellent performance to date
Domestic
First use: La Guardia 2002
Logan (2004-2007); Charlotte (2006); Bob Sikes (2011); Herlong
Recreational (2012); NW FL Beaches Intl (2014); Williston FL
(2015); Georgetown SC (2016)
Has been used for runways, taxiways, aprons
No evidence of defects to date (no rutting, no raveling, no cracking)
Bottom Line: 20+ years of use with excellent performance

Administration
Boston Logan 2014
(10 years old)

Administration
P- 601 Specification
Developed by FAA in 2014, allows use of FR PMA without MOS

Non-proprietary performance based spec no secret ingredients
1 min 2 max thickness surface course
This spec is NOT currently approved for use on runways
Asphalt Binder Specification

ASTM D6373 Minimum grade of PG 82-22
ASTM D6084 Elastic recovery at 25C 85%
ASTM D7173 max temp diff of 40F when using ASTM D36 Ring
and ball apparatus
Mix Specification
P-401 mix
Target Air Voids = 2.5%
50 blow or 50 gyration mix compaction regardless of aircraft type
Max weight loss by 24-hr fuel immersion = 2.5%

Administration
Typ. P-401 P-601
PG 64-22 StellarFlex FR

Administration
FAA Fuel-Resistant Specifications requirement:
24 hr. jet fuel soak = <2.5% wt. loss
Typ. P-401 P-601


Administration
FAA Fuel-Resistant Specifications requirement:
24 hr. jet fuel soak = <2.5% wt. loss
Typ. P-401 P-601

= 10% wt. loss = <1% wt. loss

Administration
Potential Pros and Cons of P-601
Pros:
High fuel resistance
Increased stability/durability
Extended pavement life
Reduced maintenance
Cons:
Increased initial cost
Temporary learning curve for
consultants and contractors

Administration
Surface Treatments

Administration
FAAApprovedSurfaceTreatmentsforUseOnAsphaltPavements
Item ApprovedUses Example
P608 EmulsifiedAsphaltSealCoat(WashingtonOffice'srecommendation) AllRW'sandTW'swithsuitableaggregate;Anyotherasphaltpavementwithorwithoutaggregate GSB88
P609 BituminousSurfaceTreatments GAairportsservingplanesupto12,500lbs(MOSRequired);onlyrecommendedforroads chipseal
P626 EmulsifiedAsphaltSlurrySealSurfaceTreatment GAairportsservingplanesupto12,500lbsorupto60,000lbswithFAAapproval
P629 ThermoplasticCoalTarEmulsionSurfaceTreatment GAairportsservingplanesupto12,500lbsorupto60,000lbswithFAAapproval GripFlex
P630 RefinedCoalTarEmulsionsWithoutAdditives,SlurrySealSurfaceTreatment GAairportsservingplanesupto12,500lbsorupto60,000lbswithFAAapproval
P631 RefinedCoalTarEmulsionsWithAdditives,SlurrySealSurfaceTreatment GAairportsservingplanesupto12,500lbsorupto60,000lbswithFAAapproval
P632 BituminousPavementRejuvenation GAairportsservingplanesupto12,500lbs;othernonrunwayairfieldpavements(MOSrequired)

AnMOSwasrecentlyapprovedallowinguseofP632ontaxiwaysatPascagoula.
Notes:
Somestatesareprohibitingtheuseofcoaltarproductsduetoenvironmentalandsafetyregulations.Theengineermustverifythattheselectedmaterialscomplywithallrequirements

Administration
Advisory Circular Changes

Administration
New and Revised FAA Airports Series 150 Advisory Circulars (ACs)
Number Title Publication Date

150/5200-28F Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) for Airport Operators 12/30/2016
150/5320-6F Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation 11/10/2016
150/5200-30D Airport Field Condition Assessments and Winter Operations Safety 7/29/2016
150/5100-20 Guidance on the Extraction of Oil and Gas on Federally Obligated Airports 3/23/2016
150/5345-46E Specification for Runway and Taxiway Light Fixtures 3/2/2016
150/5345-44K Specification for Runway and Taxiway Signs 10/8/2015
150/5300-13A Airport Design 2/26/2014
150/5335-5C Standardized Method of Reporting Airport Pavement Strength - PCN 8/14/2014
150/5370-10G Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports 7/21/2014
Order 5100.38D Airport Improvement Program Handbook 9/30/2014

Administration
Draft FAA Airports Series 150 Advisory Circulars (ACs)
Number Title Publication Date

150/5200-37A Safety Management Systems for Airports
150/5320-12D Measurement and Maintenance of Skid-Resistant Airport Pavement Surfaces
150/5360-13A Airport Terminal Planning and Design
150/5360-14A Access to Airports by Individuals with Disabilities
150/5370-2G Operational Safety on Airports during Construction
150/5340-1M Standards for Airport Markings
150/5340-30J Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids
150/5050-4A Community Involvement in Airport Planning

Administration
Wrap Up
PDHs/CEUs
Training Feedback-Survey

Administration

2017 ALDOT - FAA Consultant Workshop Slides

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

2017 ALDOT - FAA Consultant Workshop Slides

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

2017ALDOT&FAA

PROJECT CHANGE ORDERS

PROJECT MANUALS AND CONTRACTS

RUNWAY MAINTENANCE IN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS

Copy ALDOT on all change order correspondence

Copy ALDOT on all change order correspondence

Copy ALDOT on all change order correspondence

Copy ALDOT on all change order correspondence

Copy ALDOT on all change order correspondence

Per the circular a Construction Management Program (CMP) is required when

Send ALDOT copies of Contract Documents including plans and specifications.

If any runway/taxiway pavement was listed as poor or fair in the latest

If pavement is listed in good condition it would still be good to show

FAA Airports Issues

Presented to: Alabama Consultants Workshop

By: Jeff Orr

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 2

Ryan Constans 601-664-9895

Luke Flowers 601-664-9898

Brian Hendry 601-664-9897

Wesley Mittlesteadt 601-664-9884

Kevin Morgan 601-664-9891

Jeff Orr 601-664-9885

Will Schuller 601-664-9883

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 3

13:00-13:30 Engineering Contracts, CSPP/P&S Reviews, Quarterly Luke Flowers

14:35-14:50 P-601, Surface Treatments, New ACs Jeff Orr

14:50-15:00 Wrap Up, PDHs/CEUs, Training Feedback-Survey Dr. Eagerton

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 4

Brian Hendry, RLA

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 5

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 6

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 7

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 8

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 9

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 10

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 11

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 12

Denver Intl Airport Jacksonville Intl Airport

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 14

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 15

Order 1050.1F - Environmental Impacts: Policies &

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 16

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 17

When proposed action does not normally require EIS and

Acquisition of land greater than 3 acres for, construction of, new

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 18

EA Short Form - when impacts expected to be

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 19

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 20

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 21

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 22

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 23

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 24

Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance - 11/7/2005

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 25

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 26

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 27

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 28

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 29

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 30

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 31

Alabama Consultants Workshop Federal Aviation 32