Sunteți pe pagina 1din 11

Our mobile society is redistributing the species on the

earth at a pace that challenges ecosystems I threatens


human health and strains economies

Peter M.lyitolisek, Carla M~' Antonio, Lloyd L~oope


and Rand~stbrooks

T he human species is noteworthy for One recent and notorious example is


its ability to forge into new environ- the Eurasian zebra mussel. Like many
ments and drastically alter them. No oth- other aquatic organisms, the zebra mus-
er species in the earth's history has sel entered North America in the ballast
spread throughout every continent and water of ships. And, like many other in-
explored every remote island. We recog- troduced species, it spread rapidly once
nize some of the environmental conse- it arrived, covering the bottoms of rivers
quencesof the expansion and movement and lakes and venturing into the water-
of the human population-<:hemical pol- works of municipalities and industries.
lution, ravaged landscapes and the sub- According to a 1993 report from the Of-
sequent effects on natural ecosysteIruY- fice of Technology Assessment, the cost
but we fail to fully appreciate the extent of clearing blocked intake pipes will
to which we manipulate the distribution reach about $3.1 billion over a 10-year
of life on the earth. In the course of our period. The economic consequences are
global travels, we don't merely bring the enormous, but the ecological conse-
material trappings of our cultures, we quences may dwarf them: Zebra mus-
also carry other species with us, fre- sels reduce natural algae populations
quently with a benevolent purpose in and biological productivity and increase
mind, but often unwittingly and without the concentrations of nutrients in entire
any particular intent. Unfortunately, the ecosystems. They continue to spread
redistribution of the earth's species is into rivers, lakes and canals throughout
proving to be ecologically and economi- North America.
cally damaging, and the costs will con- We suggest that biological invasions
tinue to worsen. by notorious species such as the zebra
mussel and by its many less-famous
PeterM. Vitousekis proJ.t!ssorof biologicalsciences counterparts have become so wide-
a~anford University.Jarla D' Antonio is assis- spread as to constitute a significant com-
tant professorof integrativebiologyat the Universi- ponent of global environmental change.
ty of California,Berkeley.Shehasworkedon the This point is not widely appreciated,
ecologyof plant invasionsfor thepast10years. even by the global-change researchcom-
LloydLoopeassesses theextentof biologicalinva- munity and by those who work to con-
sionsand devisesstrategiesto reducetheir effects trol biological invasions. (SeeElton 1958
for the u.s. Departmentof theInterior at Haleakala
for one important exception.) In part,
NationalPark.Randy Westbrooks worksto keep
newnoxiousweedsout of the UnitedStatesforthe
this lack of appreciation reflects the nat-
u.s. Departmentof Agriculture,Animal and Plant urallimitations of an individual's spa-
HealthInspectionService.Vitousek'saddress:De- tial perception. Individuals can observe
partmentof BiologicalSciences, StanfordUniversi- biological invasions almost anywhere,
ty' Stanford,California94305. but it is much more difficult for an indi-

468 American Scientist, Volume 84


region number of number of percentage of
native species non-native species non-native species

Mediterranean
Europe
Germany
Germany
Finland
Poland
Britain (+Ireland)
Turkey
Turkey
France
Czech Republic
Italy
Switzerland
Denmark
USA
California
Alaska
Florida
New England
Great Plains
Texas
Canada
Newfoundland
Greenland
Mexico
Australia
Uganda
Egypt
Rwanda
Tanzania
Namibia
Senegal
South Africa
South Africa
Bermuda
Bahamas
Cuba
Puerto Rico
Hawaii
Cook Islands
Fiji
French Polynesia
New Caledonia
Solomon Islands
New Zealand

Figure 2. Non-native speciesof vascular plants have invaded many parts of the globe. The total number (bar length) of native (tan) and non-native
(red) speciesin a region varies from about 500in Bermuda to more than 23,000in the countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea.The percentage
of non-native speciesin a particular region tends to be greater on island habitats, but many specieshave invaded the continents as well. Sources:
a -Quezal, Burbero, Bonini and Loisel1990; b -Heywood 1985,estimate of native species;c -Weber (in preparation); d -Rejmanek and Randall
1994;e- Rejmanek (unpublished); f -U.S. Congress,Office of Technology Assessment 1993;g -Kruger, Breytenbach, Macdonald and Richardson
1989;h -Wagner, Herbst and Sohmer 1990;i- Given 1992;j -Heywood 1989.

vidual to perceive that the invasions are There are several components to glob- geochemical cycle of nitrogen and other
almost everywhere. In part, it may also al change that are widely recognized as elements, the production and release of
reflect a narrow view of global environ- being caused by the explosive growth of persistent organic compounds such as
mental change, one that emphasizes cli- industry and agriculture in the past two the chlorofluorocarbons, widespread
matic change to the exclusion of other, centuries. These include the increasing changes in land use and land cover, and
equally significant components of hu- concentration of carbon dioxide in the at- the hunting and harvesting of natural
man-caused global change. mosphere, alterations to the global bio- animal populations. To this list we add

470 American Scientist, Volume 84


Figure 3. Invasive saltcedar (tamarisk) trees have displaced the native flora in many southwestern river coursesin the United States.The speciesis
believed to increase soil salinity and to lower the water table.

another component-the introduction of Consider the extent of the invasions islands often have more non-native
non-native species to habitats and on the basis of some countries where species of fish than native fishes. Even
ecosystemsthat were previously isolated reasonable data exist. Australia, Cana- many continental areas, such as Cali-
from each other. To varying degreeseach da and the United States each harbor fornia, Europe and Brazil, have rela-
of these components plays a role in en- more than 1,500 species of invasive tively large numbers of non-native fish
hancing the greenhouse effect or reduc- non-native plants. (California and species. Similarly, non-native birds
ing the earth's biological diversity Florida lead the continental U .5., each have established wild populations in
(through the extinction of genetically dis-with close to 1,000 invasive introduced many parts of the world. Here again,
tinct populations or species). species of plants.) Flora of many Euro- the proportion of non-native species
pean countries have several hundred tends to be greater on islands than on
Invasions Are Everywhere introduced species, and South Africa the continents. Nevertheless, non-na-
Until recently the worst efft;Cts of bio- alone supports nearly 800 species of tive avian species can be quite abun-
logical invasions were largely consid- non-native plant invaders. dant on the continents-consider the
ered to be restricted to oceanic islands. As a proportion of the total flora and widespread and abundant European
But it is becoming increasingly appar- fauna in a particular country, the non- house sparrow and the European star-
ent that non-native species are also native species may comprise anywhere ling in North America.
abundant on the continents. Attaching a from a few percent to more than 20 per-
number to the magnitude of these conti- cent of the total number. Remote islands Parks as Canaries
nental invasions is not always an easy tend to have a relatively greater propor- One way to assessthe extent of the bio-
task, however. Two different inveStiga- tion of non-native species, often as logical invasions in a particular region is
tors may cite disparate numbers of in- much as 50 percent of the total number. to take a closer look at parks and bio-
troduced species for a particular region. Another general tendency is that the logical preserves. These habitats gener-
This may be due to differences in the de- total numbers of invading introduced ally represent the least disturbed areas
finition of "introduced species," the geo- species are greater for plants than for of land in a country. A former director
graphic boundaries used for the assess- animals. This is partly because the in- of the U.S. National Park Service cham-
ment or the year in which the study took troduction of animal species (with the pioned the concept that the park lands
place. Even so, the results of different exception of insects) typically requires are an environmental analogue of min-
studies almost always suggest that the a greater degree of purposeful human ers' canaries-relatively pristine sites
scale of the continental invasions is intervention. This is especially true for where the extent of large-scale environ-
much larger than is widely supposed. birds and fishes. Nonetheless, isolated mental changes might be evaluated.

1996 September-October 471


region
are rust resistant. Since the seeds of the
whitebark pine are an important
source of food for the grizzly bear and
other animals, the decline of the tree
Europe
California may have severe consequences for the
Alaska wildlife in Glacier, Yellowstone and
Canada Grand Teton National Parks. The bal-
Mexico sam woolly adelgid attacks true firs of
Australia
the genus Abies, causing death within 2
South Africa
Peru
to 7 years by chemical damage and by
Brazil feeding on the plant's vascular tissue.
Bermuda This small cottony insect is particularly
Bahamas damaging to the Fraser fir, which is
Cuba found only in the southern Appalachi-
Puerto Rico
an Mountains (primarily within the
Hawaii
New Zealand
high elevations of the Great Smoky
Japan
Mountains National Park). Since 1963
the adelgid has killed nearly every
Figure 4. Numbers of native and non-native species of breeding birds and freshwater fish are adult (cone-bearing) fir tree in the park.
shown here for selected regions of the world. (Sources: a -Holcik 1991; b -McGinnis 1984; c -
Courtenay, Hensley, Taylor and McCann 1984; d -Moyle 1986; e -Macdonald, Kruger and Ferrar
Consequences of Invasions
1986; f -Welcomme 1981; 9 -Nomura 1984; h -Erdman 1984; i -Stone and Stone 1989; j -Mc-
Dowal11984; k- Jonsson 1993; 1- Long 1981; m -Roberts 1985; n -Sick 1993; o -Paterson 1972; p -
Many invasions are reflections of other
Raffaele 1989; q -Kinsky 1980; r- Higuchi, Minton and Katsura 1995.)
changes rather than agents of change
themselves. For example, invading
plants that only occupy roadsides thrive
An examination of floristic lists re- The consequencesof invasion by sev- in these circumscribed habitats. These
veals that anywhere from 5 to 25 per- eral fish species into the aquatic and plants cannot be regarded as serious
cent of the vascular plants in the Unit- wetland ecosystems on the continental threats to native biological diversity ex-
ed States reserves are non-native U.S. are as severe as many island inva- cept where ecological restoration is at-
species. For the most part the intro- sions. In the streams of Sequoia-Kings tempted. Moreover, some introduced
duced species pose little or no threat to Canyon National Park, for example, in- species are beneficial to humanity-it
native species or ecosystems. There are tentionally introduced brook trout and would be impossible to support the pre-
some important exceptions, however. brown trout have displaced the native sent population of the United States en-
Fire-promoting grasses (such as cheat- rainbow trout. In other parks, the intro- tirely on native plants and animals. How-
grass) have invaded several semi-arid duction of brook trout and rainbow ever, many invading species degrade
areas, tamarisk is prevalent in many ri- trout in waters that were originally bar- human health and wealth, whereas oth-
parian habitats of the Southwest, ren of fish has greatly reduced the ers affect the structure of ecosystems or
Melaleucais rampant in the wetlands of numbers of native invertebrates and the maintenance of native biological di-
the Florida Everglades, and purple amphibians. In the Great Smoky Moun- versity. We shall discuss an example of
loosestrife dominates waterways in the tains National Park the introduction of each of theseto illustrate some of the con-
Northeast and Midwest. Plant inva- rainbow trout threatens the existence of sequencesof recent invasions. For every
sions also threaten native biota in native brook trout populations. Even example we discuss here, there are many
Hawaiian reserves, where the percent- the relatively pristine waters of Glacier others that are equally well documented
age of non-native species may be as National Park have been largely com- and at least as harmful.
much as 50 to 70 percent of the flora. promised by the introduction of fish in Newly introduced speciescan act as vec-
There are some serious threats to U.S. this century. tors of disease.A recent example of an
parks from animal invasions as well, es- The introduction of non-native in- introduced disease vector is the Asian
pecially ungulates. Feral pigs may be sects and microorganisms has also tiger mosquito, larvae of which were
the single most damaging introduction worked havoc on the forests of the U.S. brought into the United States in used
in the national parks and reserves of the parks and reserves. The white pine automobile tires that were imported for
United States. The effects of the pigs on blister rust and the balsam woolly retreading and resale. Two earlier intro-
otherwise undisturbed areas are severe adelgid, which were costly to commer- ductions of the tiger mosquito in ship-
and pervasive in the Great Smoky cial forestry for many years, are now ments of military tires had failed to be-
Mountains National Park and in Hale- devastating the parks. Both were come established. With the recent
akala and Hawaii Volcanoes National brought to the United States nearly 100 growth of commercial tire imports,
Parks. In Hawaii the pigs make a signif- years ago on nursery stock from Eu- however, the importation of mosqui-
icant contribution to the dispersal of in- rope. White pine blister rust attacks toes has also increased. (In 1986, 6.8 of
vading plants. Other harmful invaders five-needled pines and is now killing every 10,000 tires were infested with
include feral goats in Hawaii (now sugar pines in the forests of Yosemite mosquito larvae.) The Asian tiger mos-
largely removed), feral burros in the and Sequoia-Kings Canyon National quito first became established in the
Grand Canyon and other southwestern Parks. Whitebark pine trees are also be- United States in the 1980s,and by 1992
parks and mountain goats in Olympic ing hit hard throughout their entire the mosquito had spread throughout 25
National Park. range--fewer than 10 trees in 100,000 states. In its natural range, the mosqui-

472 American Scientist, Volume 84


to is a vector of dengue fever and other
human arboviruses. In the United
States the mosquito can feed on most
mammals and birds and is a vector for
eastern equine encephalitis, an often fa-
tal viral infection of people as well as
horses (Craig 1993).
Biological invasions can be expensive.
Non-native species can affect crops,
rangelands and commercial forests,
costing millions of dollars annually in
lost yields and expensive efforts to con-
trol the invasions. Biological invasions
can also be especially costly to develop-
ing economies, which typically have
smaller margins for dealing with addi-
tional costs.
One prime example is the golden ap-
ple snail (Pomaceacanaliculata) in Asian
rice ecosystems. The snail was original-
ly brought from South America to Tai-
wan to provide a supplemental source
of protein and to increase the export in- Figure 5. Zebra mussels clog the municipal and commercial waterworks in the Great Lakes re-
come of small rice farms. Its benefits gion. Since their introduction to North America in the late 1980s,the zebra mussels have spread
proved to be illusory. The local people throughout the waters in the Great Lakes. Here a water jet is used to clear zebra mussels from the
find the snail distasteful-a recipe call- walls of a pump room in a Detroit power station.
ing for "washing in a vinegar solution
repeatedly to remove mucus and ling the snail with molluscides and the position, hydrology, geomorphology,
slime" may explain why. Moreover, the loss of crop yields. This amounted to 25 nutrient cycling or natural disturbance
snail export market was closed because to 40 percent of what the Philippines regimes. Invaders that affect each of
of health concerns. At the same time, spent on rice imports in 1990. It repre- these processes are known. One dra-
both the environmental and economic sents just one year's damage in one of matic example is the invasion of the ni-
costs of importing the golden apple many infested countries. trogen-fixing tree Myrica faya into
snail have been very high. Snail popu- Invaders alter ecosystemprocesses.In- Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. Be-
lations grow rapidly, consuming young vaders don't simply consume or com- cause the seeds of this tree are dis-
rice plants as they spread throughout pete with native species-they can persed by a variety of birds, the tree
irrigation canals. Despite the outcome change the rules of existence for all can easily spread to new sites created
of snail introduction in Taiwan, the en- species by altering ecosystem processes by volcanic eruptions. The conse-
trepreneurs who originally imported such as primary productivity, decom- quences for the native plant life are
the snail simply exported it to other
countries. As of today the snail has
spread throughout most of the Far East
and southeastern Asia.
The life history of the snail invasion in
the Philippines can be traced in the titles
of publications over the span of a few
years. A 1986 article, "Golden Kuhol
propagation good source of income,"
promises economic opportunity, where-
as a 1988 report, "The distribution and
control of the introduced golden snail in
]
the Philippines," hints at the need for re-
straint, and a 1989 article, "The golden
apple snail: A serious pest of lowland
I
rice in the Philippines," documents the ~
costly turn of events. Rosamond Naylor ~
,

of Stanford University has recently eval-


uated the economic costs of the snail in- ~
E-'
vasion in the Philippines. In 1990,the to-
~
tal cost to farmers was between $27.8 8
million and $45.3 million, including the Figure 6. Asian tiger mosquito entered the United States by way of imported automobile
costs of picking the rice by hand, re- tires in the 19805. By 1992 the species had spread throughout 25 states. Here a mosquito
planting destroyed crops and control- rests on a human arm.

1996 September-October 473


profound. Usually the growth of native forests, including the effects of climatic Global Changes Interact
plants in young volcanic sites is limited change, the increased concentrations of The recognition that biological inva-
by the poor availability of nitrogen in atmospheric CO2, acid rain and oxidant sions are a component of global change
the soil. With the introduction of Myri- air pollution. However, by far the great- leads one to ask how the movement of
ca, however, there may be a rapid, est perturbations in this century have species might interact with other
fourfold increase in the amount of bio- involved repeated waves of invading changes taking place on a worldwide
logically available nitrogen added to pests and diseases (Sinclair, Lyon and scale. It seems likely that each compo-
the soil. This alters the plants and soil Johnson 1987). Some pests, such as the nent of change interacts with others to
organisms that can thrive in the newly gypsy moth, consume a variety of varying degrees. We are far from under-
formed volcanic habitats. As it hap- species, and their full effects on forest standing the dynamic among all of
pens the species that do well in these diversity are not yet known. Other more these components, but the ultimate con-
altered habitats are non-native organ- specialized pathogens in the eastern for- sequences may go beyond simple addi-
isms. In essence, an invasion by one est have virtually eliminated the once tive effects. Here we introduce some ex-
species changes the composition and dominant American chestnut and the amples of how two of these components
the dynamics of an entire ecosystem. American elm. Other species that are might interact with changes in the dis-
Invasionsreducebiologicaldiversity. The declining because of newly introduced tribution of plants and animals.
eastern deciduous forests of North insects and diseases include the Ameri- Changesin land use can promote inva-
America are a diverse ecosystem that can beech, mountain ash, butternut, sions. The human species is now the
appear to be as resistant to biological in- eastern hemlock, flowering dogwood premier agent of ecological disturbance
vasions as any. Alt~ough these forests and sugar maple (Langdon and John- on the planet. We have not merely in-
were cleared extensively in the 1800s, son 1992, Campbell and Schlarbaum creased the frequency and intensity of
they have recovered substantially in this 1994). We predict that the invasion of disturbances; we have also created
century. The scientific community has non-native species will continue to be landscapes that are unlike anything in
put a great deal of effort into under- the greatest threat to the diversity of the evolutionary history of many
standing various assaults on these these forests in the foreseeable future. species. The alteration of natural dis-
turbance regimes often promotes the
invasion of species that would other-
wise not be found in a region.
Consider the interaction between
land use and the invasion of fire-pro-
moting grasses. Many grasses from
Eurasia and Africa have spread through-
out the arid and semiarid ecosystems of
the Americas, Australia and Oceania,
where they increase the frequency and
the intensity of fires. They also threaten
tropical dry forests, and they are a major
impediment to the restoration and re-
forestation of cleared lands (D' Antonio
and Vitousek 1992).
Initial disturbances such as land
clearing (often with fire) allow the inva-
sion of these grasses. The invading
grasses not only provide more fuel for
the fire; they also create a microclimate
that favors an increase in the frequency
of fires. In turn, fires select against
many native species and further pro-
mote the spread of fire-adapted grasses.
The result is a positive-feedback system
that perpetuates low-diversitY shrub-
lands and savanna.
External disturbances are not always
required to set the cycle in motion. In
some cases the invasion of grass alone
can increase the probability of fire by in-
creasing the load of fuel in an area. (This
happened, for example, in Hawaiian
Figure 7.Invasive spread of the golden apple snail (red)threatensthe rice crops of severalcountrie!
in SoutheastAsia. The snail was initially introduced to Taiwan from Argentina in 1980as a poten woodlands.) It is also possible that the
tiaI sourceof protein. Within 10years it had spread north to the Korean peninsula and south to In ready availability of forage grasses that
donesia.Ironically, the snail not only consumesa significant proportion of the annual rice crop, ii withstand grazing and drought condi-
has failed to be a palatable sourceof protein in the Asian diet. The snail has proved to be a cost1J tions can promote land-use change. In
experiment in the redistribution of a species.(Adapted from R. L. Naylor, in press.) Mexico the conversion of millions of

474 American Scientist, Volume 84


hectares of the Sonoran woodland vironments, the non-native species can Although the native species on is-
desert to monocultures of African buffel then spread into less-urban habitats. lands and in aquatic ecosystems have
grass has occurred in less than a decade. The gypsy moth first became estab- historically suffered the most from the
Similarly the dry and mesic forests of lished in an urban forest and subse- introduction of non-native species (wit-
Central and South America have been quently spread throughout the eastern ness the rapid extirpation of the entire
replaced by grazing-tolerant (and fire- United States, where it is now a major native forest-bird population on Guam
responsive) African pasture grasses forest pest CLiebold, MacDonald, Berg- due to the introduced brown tree
(Parsons 1972). dahl and Mastio 1995). Outbreaks of snake), the potential for invasion-dri-
Perhaps the most dramatic and well- non-native fungal pathogens are also ven extinctions on the continents is
documented example of a cyclic rela- more common in fragmented forests substantial. One way to estimate the
tionship between an introduced grass close to urban areas. potential for extinction on the conti-
and the increased incidence of fire is Invasions promote extinction. The ex- nents is to appreciate the relationship
the invasion of European cheatgrass tinction of genetically distinct popula- between species diversity and habitat
into North America. This annual tions may be the least reversible of all area. For example, on many islands
species invaded shrub and steppe global changes, and there is clear evi- and isolated habitats the number of
habitat in the Great Basin, which was dence that biological invasions con- avian species present is linearly related
previously dominated by native shrubs tribute substantially to an increasing to the logarithm of the land area that
and perennial grasses. After the inva- rate of extinction. As of 1991,44 species supports them (Preston 1960). If this re-
sion of cheatgrass the frequency of fires of fishes in the continental United States lationship is extrapolated to include
has increased from about once every were threatened or endangered by the the total area of land on the earth, the
80 years to every 4 years or so. Almost introduction of non-native fishes. Of the projected number of avian species is
5 million hectares of land in Idaho and 40 fish species known to have gone ex- substantially less than the actual num-
Utah are now nearly monospecific tinct since 1890, 27 were negatively af- ber. The difference comes about be-
stands of cheatgrass (Whisenant 1990). fected by the introduction of non-native cause isolated habitats can support en-
The suppression of natural distur- fishes (Wilcove and Bean 1994). tirely different groups of birds. If these
bances by human activity can also pro-
mote the invasion of non-native
species. This is especially true in aquat-
ic ecosystems, where reproduction is
often synchronized with natural dis-
turbance cycles. The damming and im-
poundment of most of the rivers in the
United States is correlated with the in-
vasion of non-native species into
rivers, streambanks and floodplains. It
is also associated with the rapid con-
version of species-rich riparian forests
to species-poor stands of non-native
species. For example, prior to the con-
struction of the large network of dams
that control the Colorado River, its
floodplain forests were dominated by
native cottonwood and willow. With
the construction of dams, the ground-
water tables have dropped and the in-
termittent floods that scoured the river
banks have ceased. As a result the cot-
tonwoods and the willows have been
largely replaced by introduced saltcedar
(tamarisk) .
The fragmentation of natural habi-
tats with the encroachment of farm
lands and urban development has also
encouraged the spread of non-native
species. Urban forests and parks repre-
sent an increasing percentage of our re-
maining near-natural habitat and are
often prime areas for newly introduced
plants and animals. This is partly be-
cause the international traffic in cities is
often the route by which a non-native
species is introduced to a country. Hav-
ing established themselves in these en- Figure 8. Eggs of the golden apple snail (pink) cluster on rice plant~ in Southeast Asia.

1996 September-October 475


Figure 9. Grass invasions can initiate and maintain a grass-fire feedback system that prevents the regeneration of native woody species over large
areasof the planet. The cycle can begin after the purposeful land clearing or after "natural" invasions of woodland or shrubland by introduced
grasses.(Adapted from D' Antonio and Vitousek 1992.)

isolated areas were to be brought into plants and animals across the two con- Hawaiian Islands arose from a success-
contact with each other, some species tinents. The result was asymmetrical: ful colonization by one group or an-
would eventually be lost through com- Although some South American mam- other every 50,000 years or so. Recent-
petition, predation or disease. Regional mals (notably the opossum) crossed ly, however, about 15 to 20 insect
distinctiveness begets global diversity. the isthmus, many more North Ameri- species become established on the is-
One of us (Westbrooks) and col- can mammals spread into the South- lands every year (Beardsley 1979).Sim-
leagues applied this approach to calcu- ern Hemisphere. The invasion of the ilarly, in eastern North America, there
late the potential for extinctions result- North American mammals was associ- is only one known instance in the post-
ing from biological invasions. Based on ated with a significant increase in the glacial past (within about 10,000 years)
known species-area relationships and extinction rate for the native mammals in which a species of tree (the eastern
the number of mammalian species pre- of South America (Marshall, Webb, hemlock) declined over much of its
sent on each continent, they calculated Sepkowski and Raup 1982). range in a way that is consistent with
that a single supercontinent comprising an attack by a pathogen (Davis 1981).
all the land area on the earth would What Can Be Done? Yet several species of American trees
support about 2,000mammalian species. In our attempts to convince others of have been devastated by introduced
In fact the earth supports about 4,200 the si~cance of biological invasions pathogens in the past century alone.
species of mammals. This analysis im- we have run into two major obstacles. Both examples suggest that recent in-
plies that the complete breakdown of First, there is a belief that invasions rep- vasions are very different from those
biogeographic barriers might result in resent a natural process that has always of the past.
the eventual extinction of more than been a part of evolutionary history. The It is true that stemming the tide ofbio-
half of the earth's mammalian species. second is a feeling that the easeof travel logical invasions poses a huge challenge
We think that estimating the poten- and the continued expansion of the to the ingenuity of humankind. But it is
tial for extinction with species-area re- global economy will make it impossible not hopeless. A large part of the task is
lationships is as valid as estimates that to prevent invasions. simply convincing our colleagues, stu-
are based on the loss and fragmenta- It is of course true that invasions dents and the public at large that it is a
tion of habitats (Wilson 1992). This ap- (like extinctions) have always been problem worthy of our best efforts. A
proach is also supported by paleobio- with us. What differs now is the in- greater awareness of the issues increases
logical evidence. About 3 million years creased rate of the invasions, which is the likelihood that citizens will respond
ago North and South America became so large as to represent a difference in in a positive way. In some respectsthis is
connected by the Isthmus of Panama, kind rather than degree. For example, already being achieved at a local level in
which allowed a massive exchange of until recently all of the insects on the California, Hawaii and Florida. Here the
prevention of biological invasions is be-
coming popular as county councils con-
sider the creation of emergency funds for 4,000
the conh"ol of invasive species to assure
the protection of biodiversity, the local 00
Q)
lifestyles and the tourist industry. Ulti- 'u
Q)
mately; reducing the extent of biological g. 3,000
invasions may prove to be as rewarding c
.~
as reducing the rate of fossil-fuel con- m
E
sumption-while being less of a threat E
ca
to economic growth and lifestyles. E
2,000
The legal framework concerning the a
control and quarantine of plants and a;
.0
animals also needs improvement. Ex- E
~
c
isting laws and policies such as the
Federal Noxious Weed Act of 1974, the 1,000
Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Pre-
vention and Control Act of 1990 and
the Lacey Act can be enforced and
strengthened. Given a reasonable 0
amount of public support, intelligent 107
new approaches can be devised. More-
land area (square kilometers)
over, concerned and informed citizens
can participate personally by recogniz- Figure 10.Number of mammalian speciesin a given areaof land is dependent on the isolation of
these speciesfrom eachother. If the earth's land masseswere united into a single supercontinent,
ing incipient invaders and preventing
the total area of land (more than 108 square kilometers) is projected to support about 2,000
them from spreading. The concept of
speciesof mammals (blue dot). However, there are about 4,200mammalian specieson earth (red
thinking globally and acting locally ap- dot). The authors suggest that the current geographic isolation of the earth's species promotes
plies well to stoppin~iological inva- and maintains biological diversity. By transporting other species across natural geographic
sions. No other for of global change boundaries, human beings threaten to reduce the diversity of life on the earth. The projected to-
offers educated and dedicated individ- tal number of mammalian speciesis based on surveys (black dots) showing a linear relationship
uals such an opportunity to make a between the number of species in a region and the logarithm of the area of land in the region.
lasting difference. (Adapted from work by A. Launer of the Center for Conservation Biology, Stanford University.)

Figure 11.The growth of industry and agriculture in the past 200years has promoted at least six identifiable components (middle row} of global en-
vironmental change.To varying degreesthese components alter the earth's climate and reduce the planet's biological diversity. A general notion of
the magnitude of these effects (arrow thicknesses}can be estimated, but the interrelationships and the synergistic effects of all six components have
yet to be fully appreciated. (After Vitousek 1994.}

1996 September-October 477

~
and Aquatic Sciences 48 (supplement Quezal, P., M. Burbero, G. Bonini, and R.
Bibliography Loisel. 1990. Recent plant invasions in the
1):13-23.
Beardsley, J. W. 1979. New immigrant insects in circum-Mediterranean region. Pp. 51-60 In
Hawaii: 1962 through 1976. Proceedings of the Huenneke, L. F. In press. Outlook for plant in-
vasions. Interactions with other agents of Biological Invasions in Europe and the Mediter-
Hawaiian Entomological Society 23:35--44. ranean Basin, ed. DiCastri, F., A. J. Hansen,
global change. In Assessment and Manage-
Campbell, F .T., and s. E. schlarbaum. 1994. and M. Debusche. The Netherlands: Kluwer
ment of Plant Invasions, ed. J. 0. Luken, and J.
Fading forests: North American trees and Academic Publishers.
W. Thiereth. New York: Springer-VerIag.
the threat of exotic pests. New York: Natur-
Kendall, K. C. 1995. Whitebark pine: ecosys- Raffaele, H. A. 1989. A Guide to the Birds of Puer-
al ResourcesDefense Council. to Rico and the Virgin Islands. Princeton:
tem in peril. Pp. 228-230. In Our Living Re-
Caraco, N. F., J. J. Cole, P. A. Raymond, D. L. Princeton University Press.
sources:A Report to the Nation on the Distribu-
Strayer, M. L. Pace, s. E. G. Findlay and D.
tion, Abundance, and Health of u. s. Plants, Rejmanek, M., and J. Randall. 1994. Invasive
T. Fischer. In press. Zebra mussel invasion
Animals, and Ecosystems, ed. E. T. LaRoe, G. alien plants in California: 1993 summary
in a large, turbid river: Phytoplankton re- and comparison with other areas in North
S. Farris, C. E. Puckett, P. D. Doran, and M.
sponse to increased grazing. Ecology. America. Madrono 41(3):161-177.
J. Mac. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department
Castello, J., D. Leopold, and P. smallidge. 1995. of the Interior, National Biological Service. Roberts, A. 1985. Roberts' Birds of Southern
Pathogens, patterns, and processes in forest
Kinsky, F. C.1980. Amendments and additions Africa. Cape Town: Trustees of the John
ecosystems. Bioscience 45:16-24.
to the 1970 annotated checklist of the birds Voelcker Bird Bood Fund.
Courtenay, W. R., D. A.. Hensley, J. N. Taylor, of New Zealand. Notornis 27 (supplement): Sick, H. 1993. Birds in Brazil: A Natural History.
and J. A. McCann. 1984. Distribution of ex- 1-3. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
otic fishes in the continental United States.
Kruger, F. J., G. J. Breytenbach, I. A. W. Mac- Simpson, G. G. 1980. Splendid Isolation: The Cu-
Pp. 41-77. In Distribution, Biology, and Man-
donald, and D. M. Richardson. 1989. The rious History of South American Mammals.
agement of Exotic Fishees, ed. Courtenay, W.
characteristics of invaded Mediterranean- New Haven: Yale University Press.
R. and J. R. stauffer. Baltimore: Johns Hop-
climate regions In Biological Invasions: A
kills University Press. Sinclair, W.A., H. H. Lyon, and W. T. Johnson.
Global Perspective, ed. Drake, J. A. et al.
Craig, G. B.. Jr. 1993. The diaspora of the Asian 1987. Disease of Treesand Shrubs. Ithaca: Cor-
SCOPE 37. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
tiger mosquito. In Biological Pollution: The nell University Press.
Langdon, K. R., and K. D. Johnson. 1992. Alien
Control and Impact of Invasive Exotic Species, Stone, C. P.1985. Alien animals in Hawaii's na-
forest insects and diseases in eastern USNPS
ed. McKnight, B. Indianapolis: Indiana tive ecosystems: toward controlling the ad-
units: Impacts and interventions. The George
Academy of Sciences. verse effects of introduced vertebrates. Pp.
Wright Forum 9(1):2-14.
Craven, R. B., D. A. Eliason, D. B. Fancy, P. Re- 251-297, In Hawaii's Terrestrial Ecosystems:
Long, J. L. 1981. Introduced Birds of the World. Preservation and Management, ed. C. P. Stone
iter, E. G. Campos, W. L. Jakob, G. C. Smith,
New York: Universe Books. and J. M. Scott. Honolulu: Cooperative Na-
C. J. Bozzi, C. G. Moore, G. 0. Maupia and
T. P. Monath. 1988. Importation of Aedes al- Macdonald, I. A. W., F. J. Kruger and A. A. Fer- tional Park Resources Studies Unit, Univer-
bopictus and other exotic mosquito species rar (eds.) 1986. The ecology and manage- sity of Hawaii.
into the United States in used tires from ment of biological invasions in southern Stone, C. P., and D. B. Stone. 1989. Conservation
Asia. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Africa: Proceedings of the National Synthe- Biology in Hawaii. Honolulu: University of
Association 4:138-142. sis Symposium on the ecology of biological Hawaii Press.
invasions. Cape Town: Oxford University
Crosby, A. W. 1986. Ecological Imperialism: The U. S. Congress, Office of Technology Assess-
Press.
Biological Expansion of Europe 900-1900. ment. 1993. Harmful non-indigenous
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Marshall, L. G., S. D. Webb, J. J. Sepkowski and species in the United States. OTA-F-565.
D. M. Raup. 1982. Mammalian evolution Washington D. C.: U.S. Congress Govern-
D' Antonio, C. M., and P. M. Vitousek. 1992. Bi-
and the great American interchange. Science ment Printing Office.
ological invasions by exotic grasses, the
215: 1351-1357.
grass-fire cycle, and global change. Annual Vitousek, P. M. 1994. Beyond global warming:
Review of Ecology and Systematics 23:63-87. McDowall, R. M. 1984. Exotic fishes: the New ecology and global change. EcolopY
Zealand experience In Distribution, Biology, 75:1861-1876.
Davis, M. B.1981. Quaternary history and the
and Management of Exotic Fishes, ed. Courte-
stability of plant communities. Pp. 132-153. Vitousek, P. M., and L. R. Walker. 1989. Biolog-
nay, W. R. and J. R. Stauffer. Baltimore:
In Forest Succession: Concepts and Applica- ical invasion by Myrica faYa in Hawaii: Plant
Johns Hopkins University Press.
tions. Berlin: springer-Verlag. demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystem
McGinnis, S. M. 1984. Freshwater fishes of Cali- effects. Ecological Monographs 59:247-265.
Elton, C. s. 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by An-
fornia. Berkeley: University of California
imals and Plants. London: Methuen and Co. Wagner, W. L., D. R. Herbst, and S. H. Sohmer.
Press.
Erdman, D. s. 1984. Exotic fishes in Puerto 1990. Manual of the Flowering Plants of
Moyle, P. B. 1986. Fish introductions into North Hawaii, Volume 1. Honolulu: University of
Rico. Pp. 162-176. In Distribution, Biology,
America: patterns and ecological impact. In Hawaii Press and Bishop Museum.
and Management of Exotic Fishes, ed. Courte-
Ecology of Biological Invasions of North Ameri-
nay, W. R. and J. R. stauff~r. Baltimore: Weber, E. The introduced flora of Europe, a
ca and Hawaii, ed. Mooney, H. A. and J. A.
Johns Hopkins University Press. taxonomic and biogeographic analysis.
Drake. Ecological Studies 58. New York:
FAO. 1989. Integrated "Golden" Kuhol Man- Manuscript.
Springer- Verlag.
agement. Food and Agricultural Organiza- Welcomme, R. L. (compiler). 1981. Register of
Naylor, R. L. In press. Invasions in agriculture:
tion, United Nations. international transfers of inland fish species.
assessing the cost of the golden apple snail
Given. D. R.l992. An overview of the terrestri- United Nations, Food and Agricultural Or-
in Asia. Ambio.
al biodiversity of Pacific Islands. Report, ganizations, Fisheries Technical Paper 213.
Nomura, H.1984. Dicionario dos Peixes do Brasil.
South Pacific Regional Environment Pro- Whisenant, S. 1990. Changing fire frequencies
Brasilia: Editerra.
gramme, Apia, Western Samoa. on Idaho's Snake River plains: Ecological
Office of Technology Assessment. 1993. Harm- and management implications. Pp. 4-10 In
Heywood, V. H. 1989. Patterns, extents and
ful Non-Indigenous Species in the United Proceedingsfrom the Symposium on Cheatgrass
modes of invasions by terrestrial plants In
States. U. S. Government Printing Office: Invasion, Shrub Dieoff, and Other Aspects of
Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective, ed. J.
A. Drake et al. SCOPE 37. New York: John Washington, D.C. Shrub Biology and Management. U.S. Forest
Wiley and Sons. Parsons, J. 1972. Spread of African pasture Service General Technical Report INT -276.
Higuchi, H., J. Minton, and C. Katsura. 1995. grasses to the American tropics. Journal of Wilcove, D. S., and M. J. Bean. 1994. The Big
Distribution and ecology of birds in Japan. Range Management 25:12-17. Kill: Declining Biodiversity in America's IJoIkes
Pacific Science49(1):69-86. Paterson, A. 1972. Birds of the Bahamas. Ver- and Rivers. Washington, D.C.: Environmen-
mont: Darrel Publications. tal Defense Fund.
Holcik, J. 1991. Fish introductions in Europe
with particular references to its central and Preston, F. W. 1960. Time and space and the Wilson, E. 0. 1992. The Diversity of Life. New
eastern part. California Journal of Fisheries variation of species. Ecology 41:611~27. York: Norton and Company.

478 American Scientist, Volume 84

S-ar putea să vă placă și