Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Manuel San Romn Bontes, Omar Reyes Bez, Jimena Torres Elgueta and
Flavia Morello Repetto
The main focus of this work is the proposition of an archaeological sequence for marine
hunter-gatherers in Southernmost Patagonia, based on the recent study of different coastal
archaeological sites in the Magellan Strait, Otway Sea and Almirante Montt Gulf, located between
50 and 53 South latitude. This includes discussing timing, changes and cultural traditions during
the Holocene within three sets of technological and economic features grouped in consecutive
time blocks and characteristic cultural material assemblages: a) Early period (74006200 cal. years
BP), b) Intermediate period (49002350 cal. BP) and c) Late period (<1500 cal. BP). Discriminating
archaeological elements of each assemblage are related with lithic and bone industries, both
instrument design and manufacturing techniques, as well as trends of different use of raw
materials. Modern research has raised the discussion that these Patagonian populations
were characterized by a marked homogeneity, stability and cultural continuity, assuming
that technological changes could be explained as minor or irrelevant modifications and/or
innovations occurring through time. We argue that differences express changes that are best
understood when considering the presence of different cultural traditions, based on variations
in information circulation, social interaction and their spatial scale of distribution over time. In
turn this can be related to exchange or transport of artifacts, ideas or knowledge and people.
Introduction
Archaeological research during the twentieth century has increased our knowledge about past
human occupation of marine environments in Southernmost Patagonia during the last 7000
years. Results have uncovered hunter-gatherer technological trajectories and economic strat-
egies, adding information of unknown archaeological sites and evidence of the human peo-
pling of the Patagonian and Fueguian Archipelago (Figure 1).
Moreover, results tend to open the span and detail of question, emphasizing the little we
know about the occupational history of this macro-region. Nevertheless, important research
gaps are being fulfilled and allow us to better understand these maritime hunter-gatherer
groups and their spatial and temporal distribution.
Keywords: Maritime specialization, technology, subsistence strategy, information circulation,
interaction, Patagonia, Holocene
153
Figure 1 Southernmost Patagonia Archipelago showing general location of major archaeological sites.
154
155
Figure 2 Archaeological sites OFF2L2 (top) and PSA2 (bottom). Photographs by Manuel San Romn.
A common feature for all three periods is the restricted time frames of use of each archaeo-
logical site. In most of the cases they are characteristic of camping and domestic activities.
They are mono-component sites, barring a couple of exceptions,2 a fact that allows a strong
framework reference for assessing technology and resource exploitation properties in each
of the periods. Also, in a general sense, all archaeological sites are located in similar inner sea
landscape and environmental conditions. This characteristic mostly depends on accessibility
problems that have restricted survey and excavation sampling in all the macro-region.
156
exposure (m2)
range (2 CAL
Chronologic
depth (cm.)
References
Horizontal
material2
m.a.s.l
C BP
Code
BP)1
Site
14
Emperaire and Laming
Englefield ENG 300 6100110 Oxa-1182 6663-7240 C 15 50 1961, Legoupil 1997
Pizzulic 1 PZ 1 1 559545 Ua-21032 6279-6438 A 12 60 San Romn 2013
594545 Ua-21030 6570-6881 C
Pizzulic 2 PZ 2 15 12 100 San Romn 2013
605560 Ua-21031 6675-7139 C
590070 Gif-6930 6308-6633 S
Baha Colorada BC 97 15 25 Legoupil 1997, 2014
576520 UCIAMS-121651 6436-6632 C
5210110 GrN-7614 5658-6200 C
100 Ortiz-Troncoso 1975,
Bahia Buena 1 BB 1 33 12
589565 Gif-2927 6490-6846 C 1979
633050 Beta-252914 7014-7406 G 50 San Romn 2010
Punta Santa Ana 1 PSA 1 29 12
629050 Beta-252913 7001-7272 H
Punta Carrera PC ? 597550 Ua-24688 6640-6895 G 12 ? This paper
356040 Beta-317489 3645-3910 G
Isla Humberto 1 IH1 2 8 35 This paper
375030 Beta-317611 3927-4153 G
3720130 Gif-1049 3654-4411 C
Ponsonby (Layer B) PNBY 100 6 80 Legoupil 2003
421075 Gif-10787 4447-4858 C
Pizzulic 3 PZ 3 15 389040 Beta-293303 4101-4414 G 6 40 San Romn 2013
Baha Colorada (BC) excavated by Legoupil (1997), and sites Pizzulic 1 (PZ 1) and Pizzulic 2 (PZ
2) (San Romn 2005, 2013). Another early site is known for the southern coast of Riesco Island:
site Los Noruegos (San Romn et al. 2002). The central Magellan Strait area is represented by
sites Punta Santa Ana 1 (PSA1) and Baha Buena 1 (BB 1), excavated by Ortiz-Troncoso (1975,
157
Figure 3 Lithic and bone artifact assemblage from early period: (a) multi-denticulate harpoons, (b)
detachable harpoon points with cruciform base, (c) chisels on pinniped ulnas, (d) pendants
on drilled pinniped incisors, (e) obsidian projectile points, (f) obsidian bifacial knives and (g)
fishing-line weights. Photographs and compilation by Flavia Morello and Manuel San Romn.
1979), and also by partial information from Punta Carrera site (PC).3 There are no early sites
in Almirante Montt Gulf, but sampling intensity is very low compared to the other localities.
General features of all sites include that they are shell middens of various thickness, with a
maximum of 1 meter for PZ 2 and BB 1. As for time ranges for deposit formation, PZ 2 site has
an estimation close to 300 radiocarbon years. At PSA 1 dates also confirm a very short time
deposit formation, between the top and bottom of the stratigraphic record. Both early sites
158
159
Figure 4 Lithic and bone artifact assemblage from intermediate period: (a) lanceolate projectile point,
(b) spears with small bumps on the base (left) and harpoon points with fusiform base (right),
(c) chisel on pinniped radius, and (d) small bone points. Photographs and compilation by Fla-
via Morello and Manuel San Romn.
Lithic Technology
Lithic assemblages are characterized by an elaborate bifacial industry directed to manufac-
turing big lanceolate or foliaceous projectile points, with frequent denticulate or sawed sides
(Figure 4). Technological studies show that supports are large flakes which are subsequently
thinned by bifacial extractions with hard and then soft percussion technique. The denticulate
retouch is a final step but not mandatory (Legoupil and Pigeot 2009; Morello et al. 2002; San
Romn 2013). Though typologically assigned as projectile points, their function has not been
determined by traceological analysis. Other frequent artifacts are grinding elements and bone
instrumentsbird bone pointsas those found in OFF2L1 and KM44L1. PSA 2 materials do not
have a lanceolate projectile point record, but share the other technological elements. It is also
common the record of a Levallois dbitage concept as seen in PNBY and OFF2L1 core reduction
methods for flake production (Pigeot 2003; Langlais and Huidobro 2015).
160
161
Figure 5 Lithic and bone artifact assemblage from late period: (a) lithic pedunculate projectile points,
(b) green obsidian scrapers and knife, (c) detachable harpoon points (d) retoucher (e) awl and
(f) guanaco bone artifact. Photographs and compilation by Flavia Morello and Manuel San
Romn.
162
163
164
Figure 6 Distribution of radiocarbon dates (cal. years BP). Symbols show 2 range and mean probability.
Patagonian Archipelago, including Chilo Island and the southern Chilean coast (see Reyes et
al. this volume). On the other hand, there are a number of tools that remain similar, within a
general concept, as for example awls manufactured with long bird bones or retouchers made
with artiodactyls long bones.
Changes in technology are then more evident as cultural selection, preferences and choices,
transmitted from one generation to another. In this sense, it includes information circula-
tion over time and place. Trends in subsistence and economic change can be read in a less
direct manner, but also reflect a cultural imprint. The general constant is the main reliance on
marine resources, but then minor choices and specific patterns viewed from a local perspec-
tive are significant and need an explanation. For example, fishing as a complex combination of
fauna evidence and technological elements shows a marked shift in the later period, with local
differences (e.g. Beagle Channel and Magellan Strait/Otway Sea Zangrando 2009; Morello et
al. 2012b; Torres and Ruz 2010). Similarly, the remarkable increase of procellariid birds mainly
albatross and Shearwaters (OFF2L2 and PSA 2) in the intermediate period is another tendency
that must be considered. These trends are not environmental constraints as others, like the
predominance of guanaco in PNBY or huemul in KM44L2, both related to geographic and
resource availability.
In this regard, we recognize that identifying trends in the exploitation of resources in prehis-
toric times has been positively biased towards a geographical portion of Southernmost Patago-
nia and Tierra del Fuego, which is the eastern forest and forest-steppe ecotone, and inner sea
165
166
Acknowledgements
Research funded by grants FONDECYT 1085329, 1130151, 1140939 and CD MAG0901.
We are grateful to our colleagues who participated in fieldwork: Mara Jos Barrientos, Pedro
Crdenas, Jos Daz, Consuelo Huidobro, Fabiana Martin, Ismael Martinez, Karina Rodrguez,
Vctor Sierpe, Valentina Trejo and Danilo Vilicic. Likewise, we appreciate the enriching discus-
sions with Dominique Legoupil, Marianne Christensen and Luis Borrero.
Finally we recognize the organizers of this symposium and specially Hein Bjerck for his gen-
erous help, patience and dedication.
Notes
1. Palaeobeach: 5060 70 years BP (Beta-241367), 6 masl. and found under archaeological remains
from site OFF2L2.
2. There are two exceptions, the first of which corresponds to Bahia Buena 1 site (BB 1), where a
set of guanaco remains of an upper layer was assigned to a later occupation event dated 1400
cal BP (San Romn 2007). Second, the case of Ponsonby site, which has two levels preceding
layer B (layer C and D) with dates between 6400 and 7500 cal BP, respectively. But archaeological
evidence is not diagnostic (Legoupil 2003).
3. Punta Carrera site, located at 12 masl., was completely destroyed by road work and the evidence
is restricted to rescue archaeology of lithic artifacts and fauna remains.
4. The source has not yet been located although geological research and archaeological distribution
of green obsidian suggests the source would be located near the Otway Sea (Morello et al. 2004).
167
168
169
170