Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Module leader
Dr Anthony Thickett
Module tutor
Dr Dimitrios Stylidis
Online location of handbook: This handbook can also be accessed via the TOU
2111 online learning portal (Moodle)
1
Introduction and welcome
Welcome to TOU 2111 Researching People and Places. This is a core module for
students enrolled on the following programmes: BA International Tourism
Management; BA International Tourism Management with Spanish/Mandarin.
Upon completion of this module students should have acquired a structured, in-depth
awareness of many of the key issues associated with undertaking and critically
evaluating tourism research. Specific emphasis will be placed on the practical skills
required to undertake rigorous, theoretically-driven, ethically-informed data collection
and analysis, and the techniques via which research results are disseminated.
Furthermore, the module will equip students with a flexible investigative skillset which
will assist in successfully undertaking a project or dissertation in the third year, and
provide a solid foundation from which to approach postgraduate study/research.
This handbook gives you an overview of the content of this module, provides details of
the methods of teaching and forms of assessment to be deployed, and contains the
contact details for the module teaching team. It will help you through your studies and
should be read in conjunction with the University Guide and Regulations, which is
available on the University website 24-7.
The material in this handbook is as accurate as possible at the time of production. Any
updates or changes will be communicated during teaching sessions and incorporated
into the Handbook on UniHub (the universitys virtual learning environment). Your
comments on any improvements in this handbook are welcome and should be put in
writing (with the name of the handbook) to the module leader.
Anthony Thickett
(October 2017)
2
Module teaching team
Module leader:
Anthony Thickett
A.Thickett@mdx.ac.uk
Room: W221
Module tutor
Dimitrios Stylidis
D.Stylidis@mdx.ac.uk
0208411 4465
Room W 220
Subject Librarian
Kate Healy
K.Healy@mdx.ac.uk
If you would like to request a tutorial (to discuss any detailed module-related issues,
for me to comment on an assignment outline, etc) please contact me via email
A.Thickett@mdx.ac.uk - to arrange an appointment.
3
Aims and Objectives
This module aims to develop critical awareness of a range of quantitative and
qualitative research methodologies and techniques, and the underlying principles of
research in the context of tourism. It will also develop students ability to relate
theory to real world case study material, making clear the links between theory,
method and data. In addition, the module will develop students key employability
skills. Specific attention will be paid to exploration of individual research methods
and techniques and their applicability to a range of tourism-related research
contexts. Changes in approach, especially the rise of qualitative approaches and
techniques, will be considered. The module will also seek to promote students ability
to think critically or critique existing research.
Learning Outcomes
Knowledge
1. Evaluate and discuss the impact of state tourism policy on a local area related
to their field study
2. Explain the links between theory, methods and data
3. Discuss ethical issues related to real world research
Skills
4
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
Individual student grades for the module will be determined by aggregate
performance in the following summative assessment components:
The skills developed during the seminar/workshops and the knowledge gained from
the teaching programme will be important for the successful completion of the
5
module assessment. All students are expected to attend scheduled lectures and
seminar/workshops. Students are also expected to allocate study hours outside class
contact (see below) and prepare material before the seminar/workshops as required.
This may involve reading specific articles or the preparation of data for analysis and
discussion in the seminar/workshop. It is important that all students do the
preparatory work if they are to make the best use of the seminar/workshop time.
For this module students will be expected to study for a total of 300 hours. These
hours are allocated approximately as follows:
20 hours lectures
30 hours seminars/workshops
50 hours - fieldtrip
200 hours - independent study and assessment (i.e. an average of 8 - 10 hours
per week during term time)
Note: Students with specific learning difficulties are asked to register with the
Disability Support Service (disability@mdx.ac.uk, 0208 411 4945). In addition,
please advise the module leader so that appropriate learning support can be
provided.
6
Week-by-week schedule
7
Week 5 Lecture: Sampling and Data Collection Summative
Assessment
W/c 30/10/17 Workshop: Portfolio
De Vaus, D. (2014). Surveys in Social Exercise II
(DS) Research (6th eds.). London: Routledge
[Chapter 6 and 8] Questionnaire design
exercise
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A.
(2016). Research Methods for Business Brace, (2013).
Students (7th eds.). Harlow: Pearson Questionnaire Design:
[Chapter 7] How to Plan, Structure
and Write Survey
Material for Effective
Market Research. Book
Available Online
8
Week 8 Correlation
Week 9 Summative
Assessment
W/c 27/11/17 Workshop: Portfolio
Exercise III
(DS) Lecture: Conducting interviews
The Independent Samples
t-test
Reading: Chapters 1 and 5 in: Kvale S
(2007) Doing Interviews London Sage Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS
Survival Manual: A step
by step guide to data
analysis using IBM SPSS
(6th eds.). Maidenhead:
McGraw-Hill [Chapters
16-17]
Week 10 Summative
Assessment
W/c 04/12/17 Workshop: Portfolio
Lecture: TBC Exercise IV
(AT)
Interview exercise
Week 11
Lecture: Term 1 summary and assessment
W/c 11/12/17 Q&A Tutorials (by
arrangement)
(AT)
Reading: TBC
9
Week 12 Lecture: TBC TBC
10
issues, introduction to fieldtrip tutors Preparation for fieldtrip
W/c 05.03.18
Reading: Fieldtrip Handbook
Week 21 Provisional fieldtrip date
(TBC December)
W/c 12.03.18
Week 22 Lecture: Analysing fieldtrip data
Reflections on the fieldtrip
W/c 19.03.18 Reading: Brotherton (2015) Chapter 10 and discussion about how to
organise/manage your data
(AT)
(AT)
11
The Fieldtrip
The module requires that all students undertake a week-long overseas fieldtrip,
which will provide an extended opportunity to deploy the knowledge acquired and
research skills developed during weeks 1 20, and gain first-hand experience of
conducting and communicating field research. Two trips will run (most probably to
Crete and Majorca) and we will do everything in our power to accommodate
students preferences in terms of which destination they would like to travel to,
although this is not always possible.
In particular, the fieldtrip will provide a chance for students to explore the influence
of state tourism policy on the tourism experience, and the impact of tourism as a
development strategy. Students will be required to collect and record primary and
secondary data in order to generate systematic insights into the key dimensions of a
maturing destination, and to assess the myriad challenges and opportunities
generated by tourism development. Methodologically, triangulation of information
collected via different methods/sources will be a key objective.
An additional handbook will be provided closer to the departure date, which will
contain detailed information relating to the destination you will be travelling to, the
key academic themes of the trip, and a day-to-day itinerary of your visit. The criteria
that will be used to grade the fieldtrip-related assessment can be found in the
Module Assessment section of this handbook. Additional information concerning
titles, presentation formats, etc will be distributed well in advance of departure.
However, at this stage it is worth noting that particular objectives of the fieldtrip will
be to:
1) Augment conceptual work you will have undertaken in other areas of the
programme by way of gaining empirical insight into issues such as:
the effectiveness of state-led tourism development policy
the impacts of changing relationships between guests and hosts
the significance of the global economy and globalisation on processes of
tourism development
Essential Reading
Brotherton, B (2015) Researching Hospitality and Tourism (2nd Edition). London,
Sage (course text)
Blaxter L, Hughes, C & Tight M (2010) How to Research (4th Edition). Maidenhead,
Open University Press
Veal, A (2011) Research Methods for Travel and Tourism: A Practical Guide (4th
Edition). Harlow, Prentice Hall
Weekly readings as notified
Strongly recommended
Part 1 (weeks 1 11)
Fink, A (2009) How to Conduct Surveys, A Step by Step Guide. London, Sage
Finn, M, Elliott-White, M, & Walton, M (2000) Tourism & Leisure. Data Collection,
Analysis and Interpretation. Harlow, Longman
Hart, C (1998) Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research
Imagination. London, Sage
Matthews, B & Ross, L (2010) research Methods: a Practical Guide for the Social
Sciences. Harlow, Pearson
Rubin, H & Rubin, I (2012) Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data (3rd
edition). Thousand Oaks, Sage
13
Silverman, D (2010) Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. London,
Sage
Burns, P, Lester, J & Bibbings, L (eds.) (2010) Tourism and Visual Culture, Volume
2: Methods and Cases. Wallingford, CABI Publishing
Kreuger, R & Casey, M (2009) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied
Research (4th edition). Thousand Oaks, Sage
Seers, K (2012) Qualitative Data Analysis. Evidence Based Nursing Vol. 15 No. 1
Warr, D (2005) It was fun... but we don't usually talk about these things'':
Analyzing Sociable Interaction in Focus Groups. Qualitative Inquiry Vol. 11
Bell, J (2010) Doing your Research Project: A guide for first time researchers in
education, health and social science. Maidenhead, Open University Press
14
Coles, T, Duval, D, & Shaw, G (2013) A Students Guide to Writing Dissertations and
Theses in Tourism Studies and Related Disciplines. Abingdon, Routledge.
Hakim, C (2000) Research Design: Successful Designs for Social and Economic
Research. Abingdon, Routledge
Recommended Journals
Qualitative Inquiry
Lecture slides
Lecture slides will be uploaded onto UniHub after delivery of the relevant session
15
Referencing and Plagiarism
Referencing
It's really important to learn how to reference your work properly. Work that doesnt
adhere to referencing protocol will certainly result in you being marked down and
can result in you being charged with plagiarism (see below). If you are in any doubt
about how to reference properly, I would recommend in the strongest possible terms
that you consult - http://libguides.mdx.ac.uk/content.php?pid=220238&sid=1828721
and/or make an appointment with a member of the Learning Enhancement Team
(LET) to attend an Academic Writing and Language (AWL) workshop. For details,
or to book an appointment - AWL@mdx.ac.uk
What is plagiarism?
Plagiarism is the presentation of someone else's work as your own. This includes the
work, written or otherwise, for any other person, including another student.
Examples of plagiarism include:
Avoiding plagiarism
Plagiarism is easy to avoid. The standard method which is accepted in all academic
institutions is to acknowledge your sources. This involves:
Separate all direct quotations from your own work by using quotation marks
(and if using, long quotations separate by indenting the quoted section)
Cite the precise source of the quotation in a note in brackets within the main
text, including the page number on which it appears in the edition quoted.
List all sources used in preparing the essay or dissertation in a clear and
detailed bibliography at the end of your work.
Where you are not using a direct quotation but a re paraphrasing someone
else's argument, it is advisable to note the original source in the same way as
for a direct quotation, except that here quotation marks should not be used.
If students are in any doubt about how to acknowledge sources, they should consult -
http://libguides.mdx.ac.uk/content.php?pid=220238&sid=1828720
16
Module Assessment
Formative assessment
During term 1, students will participate in a programme of inter-active, activity-
based workshops during which tutors will provide verbal feedback on students
engagement and performance. These sessions will also provide a forum for
clarification of any issues prior to the write-up and submission of the portfolio of
workshop exercises (see below). Similar sessions will be run whilst we are on the
fieldtrip and after our return to the university in order to support students with
summative assessments 2 and 3.
Summative Assessment
Summative Assessment 1: Portfolio of workshop exercises (50%)
(4 x 1000 words)
This assessment requires you to produce an account of each of the four assessed
workshop exercises (see below) undertaken during term 1. If you do not attend all
the relevant workshops, it will render producing the portfolio of write-
ups highly problematic. Write-ups should balance a brief description of the
activity and its objectives with a critical, reflective account of how the processes
undertaken relate to broader methodological issues in both practical and theoretical
terms. Write-ups should adopt a concise report format. See below for details of the
requirements of the individual portfolio components and how they will be assessed.
Mark scheme:
17
Exercise 2: requires you to produce a questionnaire that could be deployed to elicit
feedback from holidaymakers who have been on a Club 18 30-style Mediterranean
party tourism holiday. Your questionnaire (which you should aim to fit on to two
sides of A4) should be designed to obtain both quantitative and qualitative data of
value to an operator. Your write-up (circa 750 words) should critically reflect on the
process of questionnaire design, draw on relevant literature, and identify strengths
and limitations associated with this method of data collection.
Mark scheme:
Questionnaire 50%
Exercise 3: using the data provided to you in class, write-up your use of SPSS to
describe, and analyse the data. Your write-up should comprise a description and the
findings of 1 example each of (i) SPSS in descriptive statistics, and (ii) SPSS in
analytical statistics. In each case provide visual and statistical evidence of your work
i.e. provide a graph/bar chart/histogram/scattergram etc. to present your findings
and the corresponding SPSS output table. Explain what SPSS function(s) you used in
your work and why this was most appropriate for your data selection.
Mark scheme:
(3,000 words)
This assessment comprises 2 parts: a 1,500 word analysis of the role of the state in
supporting a particular aspect of tourism development in Crete/Mallorca (a choice
of ELN titles will be circulated well in advance of the fieldtrips), which will
19
draw on your fieldwork data and key literature; and a 1,500 reflection on the
deployment of the methods used to collect data and any issues/challenges that were
encountered whilst in the field. Failure to keep a detailed, systematic record
of your thoughts, observations and micro-interview data while on the
fieldtrip will put students at a significant disadvantage when it comes to
producing the experiential learning narrative (ELN). See below for the mark
scheme via which your ELN will be assessed, and some advice with respect to how
you should approach this piece of assessment. More information, including the ELN
titles, and about how to present your ELN, will be provided in the fieldtrip
handbook/during term 2.
% of total
Component Requirements grade
The main objectives of the fieldtrip will be to analyse the positive and negative impacts
of tourism development in Crete/Mallorca, and to reflect on the research methods and
processes you deploy in collecting information in order to undertake this analysis. This
will involve evaluating tourism's economic, social, cultural and environmental impacts
in the various towns and regions visited. A key issue will be that of sustainability
Not all tourists are alike knowledge and understanding of how different types of
tourist behave and what motivates them can be useful in planning future
developments in tourism. It is useful therefore to attempt to assess tourism in
Crete/Mallorca through the eyes of different types of tourist and other stakeholder
groups
Please remember that whilst you are required to share all of the data you
collect in your groups, this is an individual piece of assessment and the
normal plagiarism protocols will apply
21