Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Joseph J. Bucci
Geneva College
To be presented at:
EDUCATION
Anderson University, Anderson IN
4 courses completed towards a Doctor in Business Administration (expected 2010)
West Chester University, West Chester, PA
Master of Business Administration, December 2000 – GPA 3.80
William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ
Master of Education, May 1981 – GPA 3.30
Bachelor of Arts: Political Science, May 1979 – GPA 3.73
Berean University, Springfield, MO
Ministerial Diploma, June 1986 – GPA 4.00
ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIPS
American Society for Training & Development, National and Regional Chapters
Rev. Bucci has over 20 years experience in various Human Resources and Training roles, including five years as
Director of the Learning Department of a large corporation in Philadelphia, PA. He is also an Ordained minister
with the Assemblies of God fellowship of churches. He is currently starting his second year as an Assistant
Professor in the Business, Accounting and Management Department at Geneva College, a private Christian college
in Western Pennsylvania with about 1320 full time students, with over 200 enrolled in the Business department.
Page 2
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
As a new instructor in the Business Department, the opportunity was given to teach a
core course in the curriculum, “Business Management and Business Ethics.” Previous
organization had provided background in teaching leadership courses and identifying potential
ethical issues from which lively debates challenged supervisors on their typical approach in
handling ethical matters. But in both a college classroom and a factory environment ethical
issues were identified and debated, with each individual staking their claim to follow the moral
high ground in theory, but perhaps not in practice. In reviewing various syllabi by other faculty,
much of the focus in developing an ethical frame-of-reference relied on classic philosophy and
the use of a dialectic method of discussion, where the perspectives from ethicists such as Nitche
(Instinct), Hume (Emotion), and Kant (Reason or Intellect) would be brought forth and
discussed. Then members of class were given the opportunities for debate, with one on one side
of an issue, and one on the other. The author’s pragmatic business experience did not embrace
this approach as helpful for business students in creating a living ethical model from which to be
able to make refinements and handle a plethora of business issues confident of following their
own moral values. Also, in reading LaRue Toner Hosmer (2006), moral people in business will
need to learn to convincingly present a moral point of view, and not just believe it, or not just
give ascendance to it (Hosmer, 2006). It seemed that the development of a values-based ethical
model was a key for our business students, and the process for guiding students in the
development of their own personal ethical decision making model is the subject of this paper.
The first part of the course was focused on guiding students into discovery about what was meant
by Business Ethics and what the leadership literature, ethics literature and the Bible had to say
Page 3
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
about Business Ethics. This process was meant to bring students to the point where they could
Model Framework
decision-making was considered within the context of students’ firmly-held beliefs, broad
perspectives on leadership, and the identification of faith-grounded values. There then needs to
be a methodology for evaluating choices, and a consideration of the impact of such a decision on
the perceived rights of others (Hosmer, 2006). To effectively organize the details in the creation
of this ethical decision-making model, the author has arranged the parts of the process is a
logical sequence using the acronym ETHIC2 to define the components for clarity and future
validation. A graphic representation of the author’s process for developing an ethical decision-
ETHIC2 Model (Bucci, 2007) – Based on Ethical Decision-Making Models of Trevino (1986) and Hosmer (2006)
Convincing Moral
Ethical E – Examination of the I - Identification: C - Consideration of Solution Presented
Dilemma Sources that Form Scope of Moral Outcomes: in Business
Beliefs (Moral Problem Align Personal Beliefs Language-
Standards) Shape dilemma and Perceived Benefits
into the form of a of Potential Decision Convincing
T - Identify and Endorse question Determine Where There Response must be
Foundational Tenets on Who is impacted will be Potential put forth using
Which One Stands Firm Impugning of the Business Language
Variety of
Rights of Others, and Business
H - Create Set Of Alternatives
Consider Impact of Principles to Build
Operating Values Which Decisions (done by Trust and Earn the
Define Expected choosing from a series Right to be Heard
Behaviors (in Rank of Ethical Tests) (in terms of faith
Order - Hierarchy) and values).
Classic DM Personal Beliefs/Interests Symptoms & Sources Course of Action & Impact Implementation
model would be an examination of the sources that form the student’s beliefs about management
and its ethical responsibilities. The student’s core beliefs may be uninformed, incorrect or
unrealistic, and so the source material is a critical place to begin. In doing so, students were
Page 4
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
encouraged to consider biblical scriptures and other literature written by authors with an
ideology based on biblical principles. The Bible is authoritative and normative when it comes to
ethical issues, and a reliable source for building an ethical decision-making model (DeWaay,
1992). Because the ethical question and course focus is one regarding the moral behavior of
leadership, specific attention was paid to leadership philosophies and theories that outlined
normative behavior patterns for leaders. For sources of ethical philosophies, the writings of
authors such as Hill (1997), Hosmer (2006) and Velasquez (2002) were considered containing
judicious models that reflected a strong moral perspective and were offered as source materials
to the students. Journal articles on ethical decision-making and moral leadership that reflect
biblical values were also considered, as well as other writings pertinent to outlining a
For one student project a few of the following leadership theories were examined:
Situational Leadership – Blanchard & Hersey (Guest, Hersey, & Blanchard, 1986; also
Blanchard, Zigarmi, P., & Zigarmi, D.,1985).
Transformational Leadership – Noel Tichy (Tichy, & Devanna, 1986) and Bernard Bass
(Bass & Avolio, 1994).
Level 5 Leadership – Jim Collins, Good to Great (Collins, 2001).
Servant Leadership – Robert Greenleaf (Greenleaf & Spears, 1998).
MBO – Management By Objective (Drucker, 1954).
Path-Goal Theory of Leadership – Evans and House (House, 1997).
Authentic Leadership – Bill George (George, 2003).
Spiritual Leadership – Oswald Sanders (Sanders, 1994).
Autocratic Leadership – Rensis Likert (Likert, 1961).
Principle-Centered Leadership – Steven Covey (Covey, 1991).
Transforming Leadership – Leighton Ford (Ford, 1991).
Charismatic Leadership – Jay Conger (Conger & Kanungo, 1988).
Participatory Leadership - Theories of Lewin and Vroom (Griffin, 2006).
21 Laws of Leadership – John Maxwell (Maxwell, 2003).
After reviewing the above-mentioned lists of leadership traits and leadership systems, there does
not appear to be a specific behavior or trait tied to ethics. Clusters of normative leadership
behaviors, when demonstrated, will replicate actions sympathetic to people which are closely
Page 5
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
associated with ethical behaviors. In reality, it is the character of the leader that must guide
moral behavior in choices. Collins states that in order to demonstrate “Level 5 Leadership,” one
main attribute needed by the leader is personal humility (Collins, 2001). How can a person
pursue a humble heart without a contrite spirit (Isaiah 57:15, New International Version)? The
point is that ethics is more of a heart issue, and is defined as “a set of moral principles; a theory
ethical decision-making model, the first place the students were challenged to look was at the
issues that shape their own heart. The author of Proverbs wrote, “Above all else, guard your
T – Tenets or Core Beliefs. Once research and resource examination was complete, step
two of the process was for the students to develop statements of faith and statements of
management philosophy that defined the ethical principles on which their leadership decisions
would be made. Students were asked to determine the underpinnings of their ethical point of
view, and what they said they believe about God, about people, and about business. Students
were challenged to articulate Scriptures, moral principles, and tenets from their other readings
that formed the foundation or the “roots” of their ethical decision-making model.
Page 6
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
Leaders are to be people with integrity of hear and skillful hands – Psalm 78:72
Leaders inspire their people, intercede on their behalf, and inspect their work – Nehemiah 4
From examining popular management literature, students were to identify and articulate core
beliefs about leadership which resonated with their personal beliefs about the leadership role and
People can and want to develop. Leadership is a partnership (Blanchard, Zigarmi, P., &
Zigarmi, D.,1985; George, 2003; Bass & Avolio, 1994)
A leader’s role: getting the right people in the right seats on the bus. Seeking to produce
results through people in a self-effacing way. (Collins, 2001).
Begin with the end in mind, be proactive, develop self-mastery, think win-win (Covey, 1989)
Feedback (from subordinates and supervisors) is the breakfast of champions (Blanchard,
Zigarmi, P., & Zigarmi, D.,1985; Conger & Kanungo, 1988).
Managers’ decision-making is flawed and biased, and they need strategies for overcoming
their biases (Banaji,, Bazerman, & Chugh, 2003). Most managers narrowly use only one
style of leadership, while employees require adjusting to the different tasks to which they are
assigned (Blanchard, Zigarmi, & Zigarmi, 1985). In order to maximize performance,
flexibility in directing and coaching is required.
There is a redemptive opportunity when addressing performance issues with individuals that
can add benefit to the person and help the organization as performance improves (Banks &
Stevens, 1997).
Ethical theories were examined and chosen which matched students values:
The author strongly related to Hosmer’s “Analytical Process for the Resolution of
Moral Problems” (Hosmer, 2006). However, questions emerged as to how well
before a moral problem was defined could a manager know the moral impact
(benefits, harms, rights denied)? So, some modification to Hosmer’s model may be
needed.
Virtue Theory: Normative theories are action-oriented. Virtue theory addresses
“being” vs. “doing.” It is more than just knowing right from wrong. The focus is on
achieving our personal ethical ideal by stressing the centrality of character (issues of
the heart – emphasis mine) and love as an expression of character (Velasquez, 2002).
Trevino’s (1986) ethical decision-making model considers internal and external
moderators and their impact on ethical decision-making, and so would be a good
choice for developing an ethical decision-making model based on core beliefs
(Bartlett, 2003).
H – Hierarchy of Values. The next step for the students was to recognize that upon their
underlying beliefs their values are built. An effort was made to help students draw out of their
beliefs some solid principles on which to fix their values. As seen in the model above, from
Page 7
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
stated beliefs values are defined which would direct actionable decision-making. Core beliefs
will dictate subsequent behavior (Atran, Medin, & Ross, 2005). When a clearly articulated
hierarchy of values are in place in an organization they assist managers in developing a balanced
perspective for decision-making and resolving ethical issues in the most positive way for all
organization, and assist managers in understanding the scope of their moral responsibilities.
Values should be prioritized to avoid conflicts. Below is an example of the author’s “Hierarchy
of Values” drawn from the core biblical scriptures and the management references stated above:
Intentionality – living purposely and intently, knowing who I am and whose I am, in order to
make effective choices and direct others accordingly.
Transparency – living an integrated life, and learning from mistakes. Letting followers see
that I can err, but seeking forgiveness when I do.
Responsiveness – mindful to listen to and desiring to meet the needs of others along the lines
of using one’s gifts, with second-mile patience.
Conformity – understanding the nature of service and living comfortably under authority.
Jesus cited the Centurion as one who displayed more faith than He had seen in all of Israel.
Potentiality – hopeful to affirm and cultivate the talents and abilities of others in redemptive
exchanges.
I - Identification. At this point in the ETHIC2 Model, the scope of the ethical dilemma
has previously chosen by the students from a source text book. The responsibility for the
students here is to define scope of the moral problem, to refine and shape the ethical dilemma
into the form of a question, to determine those who are impacted by the decision, and to consider
the variety of various alternatives. In searching for alternatives to resolving ethical dilemmas,
Messick and Bazerman (1996) offer a wide range of options that could assist the manager in not
prohibiting stereotyping, creating feedback loops in layers of decisions, using quantitative data
rather than subjective information for decisions, and strong self-reflective techniques which
Page 8
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
challenge the manager to consider the decision outcomes (Messick & Bazerman, 1996). In
considering alternatives to resolve their ethical dilemma, the students need to consider in what
ways they will seek to avoid impartiality. How will they check their decision-making to avoid
advancing their own interests over the interests of others? Students needed time to analyze the
ethical dilemma to form a question from which the rest of their decision-making process would
radiate. They would refer back to articulated statements of faith and now bring their values into
sharper focus, leading to some further questioning of why they say their adhere to certain beliefs,
and whether or not they act on these beliefs accordingly. This leads to the next step in the
process.
C – Consideration of Outcomes. This section of the ethical model further considers the
impact of the decision on the perceived rights of others in preparation for the development of a
be corrupted due to an inflated self-perception (this writer might use the word sin or selfishness).
For managers, there is an illusion of objectivity and a false sense of fairness (Banaji, Bazerman
& Chugh, 2003). Therefore managers must go further than a seemingly “balanced” approach
and make a convincing argument why their decision should be viewed as right or fair (Hosmer,
2006). Hosmer (2006) provides a three-part framework to analyze and resolve ethical decisions
considering the impact looking through the lenses of economic outcomes, legal requirements and
the ethical duties of managers. Alexander Hill suggests that the goal of Christian ethics is for the
believer to imitate the character of God by applying God’s character traits (identified as holiness,
justice, and love) in the consideration of outcomes. Hill suggests that Christian ethics requires
all three characteristics be taken into account when a decision is made (Hill, 1997). This author
encouraged students to consider the integration of outcomes with business applications (ethical,
Page 9
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
commitment and effort expended by the employees under a manager’s care. Students were asked
to answer questions as to the outcomes their decision might have: considering the outcomes of
where others’ rights are denied, where the decision costs their company some sales, or where a
contract is involved. The students’ outcomes were to be examined following the Hosmer model,
and a Convincing Moral Argument, the final piece of the model development process, was to
be developed by students to answer their ethical question. There would be opportunity later in
the term for students to present the ethical dilemma and their model for resolving this dilemma,
It is in this section of the model where decision alternatives are previewed in terms of
whether the implications of these alternatives mirror the stated values and beliefs of the decision-
maker. Hosmer directs that managers cannot just reach a decision on an issue they believe in
thinking that their approached is balanced when others rights are not recognized or when others
rights are denied (Hosmer, 2006). It is beneficial for a manager to see the potential impact of
their decision clearly and objectively if at all possible to gauge the impact. When confronted
with an ethical dilemma these “tests” are often the only means used in much of the literature to
determine an appropriate ethical response (Northern Illinois University, 2006). Several “ethical
tests” were examined which could help facilitate the decision-making process:
Concise Model for Resolving Ethical Disputes (Blanchard & Peale, (1988).
Ethics Checklist for Making Difficult Decisions (Beatty & Samuelson, 2001).
Guidelines for Analyzing a Contemplated Action (Twomey et al., 2001).
Goal Setting and Outcome Predicting (Fisher & Phillips, 2004).
The Newspaper Test (Buffet & Lowe, 1997).
The PLUS Ethics Decision Making Model and Test (Ethics Resource Center, 2006).
An Overview of Ethical Decision Making Models (Farleigh Dickinson University, 2006).
Holiness, Justice, Love: three divine characteristics central to Christian ethics (Hill, 1997).
The Golden Rule (Maxwell, 2003).
Page 10
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
There are consistent principles found in many of the previously mentioned sets of ethical tests,
including whether the action is legal, the fairness of the action, and a consideration of how the
action would look in a newspaper or by the light or day or to a group of investors. Students were
encouraged to choose one or more ethical test, but not use an ethical test exclusively to resolve
Managers need to utilize clear unbiased processes and objective information when
making critical decisions, due to the potential liability for lawsuits where an action is deemed
wrongful. Students need the opportunity not only to practice ethical decision-making in non-
threatening classroom case studies but the opportunity to determine the source of their ethical
beliefs. As stated by Hosmer (2006) students need to understand that managers cannot simply
rely on their own intuition or their beliefs of what is right and fair to make a decision when faced
with a moral problem. Moral standards differ among people, and managers will have to deal
with the differences (Hosmer, 2006). Managers must go further and make a convincing
argument why that decision and balance should be viewed as right or fair. Students cannot just
say, “the Bible says.” They will need to learn to communicate their decision in the language of
business – students will need economic, legal and human resource rationale. If the above
approach is followed consistently, Hosmer (2006) states that there will be an increase in trust,
In the Biblical Management and Business Ethics course, students were by given the
opportunity to study what the leadership literature, ethics literature and the Bible have to say
about Business Ethics. The process was meant to bring students to the point where they could
develop their own model for making ethical business decisions. Once guidelines were given for
Page 11
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
students were charged with developing their own decision-making model, choosing and
thoroughly examining a case study, clearly identify the issue, and make a recommendation for a
solution based on their own personal ethical decision-making model. In class, two students were
given the same case to study, and they had to work separately on it. Students were then given a
date to briefly present their cases to see how different persons with different models resolved
1. Some papers developed their thinking, kind of “thinking out-loud.” A sense of a model was
developed from a series of idea and beliefs. The construct of an outline or process for
2. Some papers gave an outline. Bullet points with the ideas formulated in groupings. A
narrative explaining how this arrangement was arrived at seemed lacking. Also, for some
outlines, a clear sense of how the decision-making process would occur was not always
evident.
3. Some students used a classic Decision-tree format. This was good, but it didn’t always tell
the instructor how they got to this point, or clearly develop some of the details the instructor
of Outcomes).
4. The papers which were determined to most meet the spirit of the assignment did the
following:
They addressed all the steps in the outline. The more easily recognizable the better.
They developed their thinking on how they arrived at their construct, but then simply
Page 12
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
They referenced their sources of evidence, whether using the Bible, the texts, handouts,
additional materials, etc. This was recommended in the outline given out in class. It was
There was a model of some kind which pulled all the material together: an outline, a
picture, a chart, flow-chart, etc. Again, not mandated, but something that pulled all the
details together. The instructor charted the process out in a similar visual fashion to assist
5. Things which added to the entire presentation: Bibliography and/or citing of material
Students were given the opportunity to first present their models, and then to revise their models
and resolve an ethical dilemma using their models (two different grade points). Below is the
criteria used for the second evaluation (Model used to Resolve an Ethical [Case Study] Dilmma).
Others’ Rights
Cultural Uniqueness
3. Consideration of Outcomes / Impact – define what you perceive will be the impact and
Page 13
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
4. Using Your Model, form a pattern for making a decision. Carefully but briefly use your
model to determine the course of action. Then, using a persuasive style, defend your
Economic
Legal
Social
(you do not have to use all of these, but they need to be understood and demonstrated)
5. A Critique of Your Model – how did it help, what might need to change?
Conclusion:
After reading over a number of leadership theories and philosophies, this author found no clear
couple of times. However, character without the right follow through (actions) is hypocrisy, just
as faith without works is dead (James 2:17 New King James Version). It seemed that true ethics
required a student or any Christian to know their heart (Proverbs 4); also to know their values;
and then to develop systems to act accordingly. The goals of this approach were to keep things
aligned; to encourage students to stay true to their beliefs; and to continue to earn trust of
employees in decision-making by living an integrated life and speaking values in the language of
business. It seemed to this author that in order to evaluate ethical dilemmas, decisions and
opportunities, students needed to have a process or method by which they could operate, one that
was observable in establishing it, with the ability to test it. It also seemed from the literature on
Business Ethics that ethics “tests” questions and rules were all external. Relational
Page 14
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
considerations could be tainted (not wanting to hurt a person that I want to like me). There
needed to be an External Demonstration of the Internal Code. It seemed that the field of
philosophic debate. If this approach has any value to others, this author will give all the glory to
Page 15
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
Bibliography
Atran, S., Medin, D. L., & Ross, N. O. (2005). The Cultural Mind: Environmental Decision
Making and Cultural Modeling Within and Across Populations. Psychological Review,
112, 744-776.
Bamberger, P. A., & Donahue, L. H. (1999). Employee Discharge and Reinstatement: Moral
Hazards and the Mixed Consequences of Last Chance Agreements. Industrial & Labor
Banaji, M. R., Bazerman, M. H., & Chugh, D. (2003). How (Un)Ethical Are You? Harvard
Banks, R. J., & Stevens, R. P. (1997). Firing. The Complete Book of Everyday Christianity: An
A-To-Z Guide to Following Christ in Every Aspect of Life. Downers Grove, Ill:
InterVarsity Press.
Bartlett, D. (2003). Management and Business Ethics: A Critique and Integration of Ethical
Beatty, J. F., & Samuelson, S. S. (2001). Business law for a new century (2nd ed.). Cincinnati,
Bentolila, S., & Bertola, G. (1990). Firing Costs and Labour Demand: How Bad is
Page 16
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
Blanchard, K. H., & Peale, N. V. (1988). The power of ethical management. New York: W.
Morrow.
Blanchard, K. H., Zigarmi, P., & Zigarmi, D. (1985). Leadership and the one minute manager
Buffett, W., & Lowe, J. (1997). Warren Buffett speaks wit and wisdom from the world’s greatest
Collins, J. C. (2001). Good to great why some companies make the leap--and others don’t. New
Publishers.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). Charismatic leadership the elusive factor in
Covey, S. R. (1989). The seven habits of highly effective people restoring the character ethic.
Day, D. V., & Halpin, S. M. (2001). Leadership Development: A Review of Industry Best
Practices (Tech. No. 1111). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the
Dewaay, B. (1992, September). God Has Spoken. Critical Issues Commentary, 6. Retrieved
Ethical Resource Center. The PLUS Decision Making Model. Retrieved February 5, 2007, from
http://www.ethics.org/resources/decision-making-model.asp
Page 17
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
Fisher, B. D., & Phillips, M. J. (2004). The legal, ethical, and regulatory environment of
Ford, L. (1991). Transforming leadership Jesus' way of creating vision, shaping values &
Friedman, M. (1970) “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits.” The New
York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970. Retrieved January 5, 2007 from
http://www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman-soc-resp-
business.html.
George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Greenleaf, R. K., & Spears, L. C. (1998). The power of servant-leadership essays. San Francisco,
Griffin, R. W. (2006). Fundamentals of management core concepts and applications (4th ed.).
Guest, R. H., Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1986). Organizational change through effective
Hill, A. (1997). Just business Christian ethics for the marketplace. Downers Grove, Ill:
InterVarsity Press.
Hosmer, L. T. (2006). The ethics of management (5th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill-Irwin.
Page 18
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
House, R. (1997). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory.
Maxwell, J. C. (2003). Ethics 101 what every leader needs to know. New York: Center Street.
Maxwell, J. C. (2003). Ethics 101: What Every Leader Needs To Know. New York: Center
Street.
Maxwell, J. C. (2003). The 21 irrefutable laws of leadership. Nashville, Tenn: Thomas Nelson
Publishers.
McCall, J. J. (2003). A Defense of Just Cause Dismissal Rules. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13,
151.
Messick, D. M., & Bazerman, M. H. (1996). Ethical Leadership and the Psychology of Decision
Meyerowitz, S. A. (1985). Save Your Business Client from a Wrongful Discharge Suit. ABA
Northern Illinois University. (2006). Ethics Handbook: Building Ethical Leaders [Brochure].
DeKalb, IL.
Rae, S. B., & Wong, K. L. (2004). Beyond integrity a Judeo-Christian approach to business
Tichy, N. M., & Devanna, M. A. (1986). The transformational leader. New York: Wiley.
Page 19
Joe Bucci April, 2007
Ethical DM Model Development
Twomey, D. P., Jennings, M., & Fox, I. (2001). Anderson's Business law & the legal
environment principles & cases (14th ed.). Cincinnati, Ohio: West Legal Studies in
Business.
Velasquez, M. G. (2002). Business Ethics Concepts and Cases (5th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Winterton, J. (2004). A conceptual model of labour turnover and retention. Human Resource
Page 20