Are Filipinos ready for

federalism?
By: Michael Henry Ll. Yusingco - @inquirerdotnet
Philippine Daily Inquirer / 12:25 AM March 13, 2015

The campaign pushing Davao Mayor Rodrigo Duterte to run for president in 2016 rides
on the advocacy for the Philippines to shift to a federal form of government. But
supporters of the extremely popular mayor seem to think that the shift can happen
easily, as if it were as simple as changing outfits.

Unfortunately, this is not the case.

For many countries, such as the United States, Malaysia, Australia and Germany,
federalization was actually a state-building effort. Each began as a loose collection of
disparate political entities that gradually, and with painful upheavals, transformed
themselves into a unified nation-state through the process of federalization.
ADVERTISEMENT

It would essentially be the reverse in our case. Consequently, we face a much harder,
more complicated, and possibly harsher version of federalization. It is thus
disconcerting that purported advocates of federalism seem oblivious to the gravity of
this sociopolitical reform. They quickly harp on the promise of enhanced local
autonomy without even considering the readiness of the local leadership to assume the
big responsibility of local governments under federalism, as if the fitness of the current
crop for this form of government were already a given.

Note that one of the most important lessons in the discourse on the proposed
Bangsamoro Basic Law is the recognition of the Autonomous Region in Muslim
Mindanao as a failed experiment. The lesson being: Increasing the autonomy of local
governments will ultimately amount to nothing if local leaders are incompetent and
incapable of properly utilizing expanded powers and resources.
In fact, the overdependence of local government executives on the Internal Revenue
Allotment and the continued existence of central-government largesse, or pork barrel
funds, signify the stark reality that the development perspective of local leaders has not
reached the level of sophistication necessary to sustain a federal government structure.

Political dynasties constitute the unequivocal proof that the quality of our local leaders
is still below par as far as federalism is concerned. According to a groundbreaking
study by the Asian Institute of Management Policy Center in 2012 titled “An Empirical
Analysis of Political Dynasties in the 15th Philippine Congress,” lower standards of
living, lower human development, and higher levels of deprivation and inequality
persist in the communities governed by political dynasties.

It would thus not be unfounded to conclude that federalizing with political dynasties
still firmly entrenched in power would actually condemn the affected communities to
perpetual poverty. It would certainly be justified to be concerned that federalizing with
the quality of local leadership still at an untenable state would only make
socioeconomic development more inequitable than it is. With these trepidations in
mind, it is indeed very difficult to conceive of Filipinos as primed and ready for
federalism.

Still I maintain that the switch to a federal form of government is a constitutional

reform that we can all rally behind. But we have to disabuse ourselves of the idea that
the switch will be as effortless as turning on a light switch.

Indeed, the primary task in the pursuit of this goal is to improve the quality of local
leadership. Ardent believers of federalism can actively push for the enactment of these
pieces of legislation: the Anti-Political Dynasty Law, the Freedom of Information Act
and the Political Party Development Act of 2014.

There are other ways of uplifting leadership standards for our governors and mayors.
ADVERTISEMENT

Nevertheless, these three laws are particularly vital because they impose structural
reforms that can instigate drastic improvements to the way local governance is currently
conceived and delivered.
However, I must emphasize, too, that the transition to federalism also requires the
elevation of the electorate to a higher level of political consciousness. First and
foremost, Filipinos must have a clear understanding of what this massive sociopolitical
undertaking entails. And the best way to commence with this task is to abandon the
populist approach that some supporters of federalism are taking.

The obvious danger here is that rhetoric and sound bytes, while good for catching the
media’s attention, could make a caricature of the advocacy and thus diminish its
potency.

I suggest a clinical and academic approach that would facilitate a circumspect and
level-headed discussion on federalization among all sectors of Philippine society.
Accordingly, I envisage a community congregation organized for such a purpose
through the barangay-assembly apparatus and moderated by genuine promoters of
federalization.

Admittedly, dissecting the intricacies of federalism does not exactly fall within the
powers of the barangay assembly under the Local Government Code (LGC). But this
mechanism is still the most convenient way to gather ordinary citizens and give them
the opportunity to speak out and be heard. After all the LGC itself considers the
barangay a “forum wherein the collective views of the people may be expressed,
crystallized and considered.”

The desired result is for all Filipinos between Batanes and Tawi-Tawi to see themselves
not as passive observers in the sidelines but as continuing stakeholders in the
establishment of federalism in the country.

Michael Henry Ll. Yusingco, a practicing lawyer, is the author of the book “Rethinking
the Bangsamoro Perspective.” He conducts research on current issues in state-
building, decentralization and constitutionalism.

Read more: http://opinion.inquirer.net/83276/are-filipinos-ready-for-

federalism#ixzz51CgHaudH
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook