Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
12. Deduction: There is a strike in the International Lines. I wait for traveling to Italy
_____________________________________________________________________________
UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA SANTA ROSA INGLÉS INSTRUMENTAL II
ESCUELA DE COMUNICACIÓN SOCIAL PROFESOR: MSC. JACINTO PABÓN
4th PERIOD
PREFIJOS
8) *in 9) inter 10) *ir 11) mal 12) mid 13) *mis 14) news
15) *non 16) on 17) out 18) over 19) re 20) sur 21) tri
SUFIJOS
8) –ant 9) –ary 10) –cious 11) –dom 12) –ed 13) –en 14) –ence
15) –ent 16) –er 17) –est 18) –ful 19) –hood 20) –ic 21) –ies
22) –ing 23) –ire 24) –ish 25) –ism 26) –ist 27) –ity 28) –ive
29) –ize 30) –less 31) –logy 32) –ly 33) –ment 34) –ness 35) –oid
36) –or 37) –ous 38) –ship 39) –sion 40) –tion 41) –try 42) –y
UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA SANTA ROSA INGLÉS INSTRUMENTAL II
ESCUELA DE COMUNICACIÓN SOCIAL PROFESOR: MSC. JACINTO PABÓN
4th PERIOD
There is no doubt that today, English is one of the most important and richest of the world’s
languages. Probably the most significant factor accounting for the latter quality was the Conquest of
England by the Normans more than 900 years ago. The conquering Normans spoke French. Most of
the inhabitants of the conquered nations spoke varieties of Anglo-Saxon, a language of Germanic
origin.
The Normans were stronger than the local English inhabitants politically and, naturally, their
language was the language of the King’s court. It also became the language for written documents,
together with Latin, and was generally regarded as “more literary” and somehow “better” than the
language of the common people. In spite of apparently being “worse”, however, the language of the
ordinary inhabitants of England, and more especially the language spoken by the inhabitants of the
central part of the country, did not die out. For centuries, the two languages continued to exist side-
by-side.
The individual most responsible for bringing them together (and one of the greatest writers in
English literature) was a customs official who lived in the late fourteenth century, named Geoffrey
Chaucer, whose Canterbury Tales is one of the most extraordinary works in English, practically
created, or at least made acceptable, a new language, which was a combination of the more elegant
French and the cruder but more powerful Germanic elements.
Since Chaucer’s time the two languages have been woven closer and closer together, forming the
single language that we now know as English. However, even today, vestiges of the differences
survive, for words of French or Latin origin still tend to occur more frequently in formal written
English than in spoken English. This naturally means that, for Spanish or Portuguese speakers, for
example it is often easier to understand written English than spoken English. You can find evidence of
this in this paragraph. Go through it and underline the words which are similar to words in your
language. It is virtually certain that these will be words of Latin (or Greek) or French derivation, and
they were brought probably to England by William the Conqueror and his men long ago.
One clear example of the dual origins of English is to be found in the ways comparative and
superlative adjectives are formed. Adjectives of one syllable, usually of Germanic origin, form
comparatives and superlatives by the addition of suffixes (-er, -est) as in German. There are nine
examples of such forms in this passage. On the other hand, longer adjectives tend to be derived from
French or Latin and form their comparative and superlative (in the same way as in Latin languages)
through the addition of words preceding the adjective (more, most), which itself remains unchanged.
Can you find the eight examples of such forms in this passage? Do you find the second type easier or
more difficult to understand than the first?
UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA SANTA ROSA INGLÉS INSTRUMENTAL II
ESCUELA DE COMUNICACIÓN SOCIAL PROFESOR: MSC. JACINTO PABÓN
4th PERIOD
READING Nº 2: A GOOD START
In 1975, Jaws, a movie about the horror caused by a terrible man-eating Great White shark, became
the most profitable movie of all time. In 1982, E.T., about a charming alien from outer space, proved to be
even more popular and profitable than Jaws. E.T. remained the champion for more than a decade, until it
was replaced by Jurassic Park, a film made in 1993 about dinosaurs being brought back to life. Any
director making one of these movies must be a very successful film-maker; a director making two of them
would be a Hollywood genius. So what can we say about Steven Spielberg, who directed all three?
To start at the beginning, we can say that Spielberg was born in Cincinnati, Ohio, on December 18 th,
1947 and that he moved with his family to Arizona, significantly nearer to Hollywood, in 1957. It must be
mentioned that even as a child he was crazy about movies and he says that he “grew up in middle-class
suburbia with three parents: his mother, his father and the TV set”. He did not study at film school and
was largely self-taught as a film-maker. He started early and at 16 made a two-hour science fiction home
movie. Incredibly, this was shown for one night at a local movie theater in Phoenix, Arizona. (In1977, he
made a rather more famous science-fiction epic: Close Encounters of the Third Kind.) In 1969, Spielberg
managed to get a job making television movies for Universal Studios.
That was where the Spielberg story really began. By 1974, he had made his first feature film, Sugarland
Express, and a year later Jaws burst on the scene, clearing swimmers from beaches around the United
States. Perhaps most of them were in movie theaters making Jaws the (then) greatest success of all time.
Steven Spielberg was 28!
In the 1980s, he made not only E.T., but also Raiders of the Lost Ark (’81) and its two sequels, Indiana
Jones and the Temple of Doom (’84) and Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (’89). Each took in over 100
million dollars. Naturally, some of Spielberg’s movies were less successful. You may not have noticed 1941
(’79), The Color Purple (’85), The Empire of the Sun (’87), Always (’89), or Hook (’91), but his big success –
and he has no fewer than eight in the all-time top 20- are really big.
Something was missing for Spielberg, however. Although by 1993 he was the most successful movie
director in history, he had never won an Academy Award (an “Oscar”) for “best film of the year” or for
“best director”. He had enchanted the public with different kinds of movie: science fiction, old-style
adventures, fairy stories, romances, dramas, a horror movie, but perhaps, suggested some cynics, he was
“too successful”; or perhaps he was not considered “serious”.
In 1993, Spielberg was making a movie which certainly had a serious theme: the Holocaust. Critics
knew it was based on Thomas Keneally’s book Schindler’s Ark, the true story of a German businessman
named Oskar(!) Schindler who had saved more than 1,000 Jews from death in the Second World War. It
was also known that the movie was to be in black and white –a radical change for Spielberg. In general,
the critics were not optimistic, and many believed that Spielberg was the wrong director for such a “dark”
subject. In fact, when the movie appeared, most critics were very favorably impressed. But what would be
the reaction of the Academy?
Each year, there are five nominations in each of a number of categories. These are announced several
weeks before the “Oscar” ceremonies, held in Los Angeles. Schindler’s List (apparently Spielberg did not
want another “ark”) received an impressive 12 nominations. But would it win any Oscars? The Color
Purple had received 11 nominations but hadn’t won any. In the event, on March 22nd, 1994, Schindler’s
List won no fewer than seven Oscars, including both “best director” and “best film” (the first black and
white movie to win that award for 34 years). Spielberg, who had said “I stopped developing emotionally
when I was 19”, and who had intended to make Schindler’s List for 10 years but felt he “was not mature
enough”, had achieved the greatest of his many triumphs. What might the future bring? Maybe, at 46,
Spielberg was just getting started.
UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA SANTA ROSA INGLÉS INSTRUMENTAL II
ESCUELA DE COMUNICACIÓN SOCIAL PROFESOR: MSC. JACINTO PABÓN
4th PERIOD
On December 27th, 1831, a tiny 242-ton ship, the H.M.S. Beagle, left Plymouth, England on a
journey that was to last five years. The major objective of the voyage was to survey the coast of
South America. That alone may have made it historically memorable, but what made it significant
was the work of the Beagle’s young naturalist: Charles Darwin.
Today we think of Darwin as a brilliant scientific thinker, but it was in fact quite surprising that he
was chosen as a member of the Beagle’s crew. He had failed as a student of medicine at Edinburgh
and then had studied at Cambridge University to become a clergyman before deciding not to. In fact
he had spent more time during his three years at Cambridge looking at beetles and other insects and
shooting birds than studying. It was probably the former interest which got Darwin his position on
the Beagle.
At the beginning of the journey, which has been called “the most famous of the great voyages of
scientific discovery and the least heroic”, Darwin had no thoughts of evolution and only vague
thoughts of it when it finished. But the five years gave Darwin, who had extraordinary powers of
observation, a unique opportunity to see and discover. He collected rocks, plants, animals, and fossils
and discovered seven new species of animals –all in South America and, significantly, two of them
extinct. He also made extensive notes of his observations and catalogued his specimens with great
care. Astonishingly, he never made another scientific trip abroad.
The Beagle started out from Plymouth, made its first stop in the Cape Verde islands and continued
to the eastern tip of Brazil. From there it sailed to Tierra del Fuego, with five prolonged visits ashore
en route. There were four more stops on the way up the western coast of Chile and Peru before the
famous stop n the Galapagos Islands, where Darwin was able to study a number of extraordinary
animals, physically isolated from the rest of the world. While there, he was also able to study a quite
ordinary (apparently) group of birds, which consisted of thirteen differently –adapted families of
finches. From the Galapagos, the Beagle sailed to New Zealand and then to Eastern Australia,
Tasmania and the southwest tip of Madagascar, around Africa’s southern cape, and across the South
Atlantic for a return visit to the easternmost point of South America on the way.
At the end of the voyage, the 27-year-old Darwin had a big enough store of information to begin
formulating the ideas which eventually, almost thirty years later, led to The Origin of Species. Often
described as “the most important book of the nineteenth century”, that publication was to affect
forever man’s considerations regarding his origins.
UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA SANTA ROSA INGLÉS INSTRUMENTAL II
ESCUELA DE COMUNICACIÓN SOCIAL PROFESOR: MSC. JACINTO PABÓN
4th PERIOD
The first television service began in 1939 in London, but was closed down after a few months due
to the outbreak of the Second World Warm and television did not become widespread anywhere
until the 1950s, in the United States. Yet today, only forty years later, it without be difficult to
imagine life without TV in most countries in the world.
When it first appeared, television was expected to make extraordinary contributions in terms of
education and culture. Radio could already reach almost everyone in most countries, and it offered a
source of entertainment, news and communications, as well as some educational programs. It had
also acted as a unifying force, with enormous numbers of people in a particular area sharing the
same experience simultaneously. In addition, it had had some notable unifying effects on language.
Television, it was thought, would have all these beneficial results, but to a much greater degree since
the viewer would not only hear but also see what was happening.
There is little doubt that some of these expectations have been fulfilled. More people see
television than ever read newspapers and they are better informed concerning events in the furthest
corners of the earth, and beyond, as a result. TV has proved useful in bringing comfort to people
unable to leave their beds, to lonely people and to old people. In some ways it may even have
brought families closer together as they stay at home more to watch their favorite programs.
However, in a number of ways the effects of television have been a source of disappointment and
even of concern to those who had such great expectations of it.
There is no doubt that the main problem with TV has been its effect on young people. Some
sociologists claim, for example, that in the United States at least, television has produced a
generation of TV-addicts with a need for a number of hours of TV viewing every day. Others say that
it has led to increased violence because an average American teenager has seen about 15,000 deaths
on TV before he or she becomes an adult. They claim that the violence on television is particularly
dangerous because its painful consequences are usually not obvious. Similarly, educationalists
complain that TV has caused reading ability and interest in reading to fall because children do not
need to use their own imaginations when watching television, as they do when reading.
In any case, whether the ultimate effect of TV is good or not, it is certain that its presence will
continue to be important in our lives. Technological developments occur constantly which make
television more versatile and more widespread. There are satellites to bring pictures immediately
from around the world, systems such as cable TV, which can bring dozens of channels into the home,
five-centimeter television sets which can be carried everywhere. Unquestionably, the challenge of
this little square monster means we all should consider how we can control it, so that it does not
control us!
UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA SANTA ROSA INGLÉS INSTRUMENTAL II
ESCUELA DE COMUNICACIÓN SOCIAL PROFESOR: MSC. JACINTO PABÓN
4th PERIOD
READING Nº5: BRAILLE
Louis Braille was born on January 4th, 1809 in Couvray, a small town near Paris. He was a very
intelligent little boy, but when he was three he had a terrible accident. He was playing with some of his
father’s tools when one of them cut his left eye. The eye became infected and the situation quickly
became worse with Louis eventually losing his sight in that eye. Then the worst possible thing happened:
his right eye became infected and he became completely blind at the age of five. Many years later Louis
Braille’s tragedy was to benefit blind people all over the world.
In Couvray, Louis received lessons from a priest and a schoolmaster had demonstrated that he was
more intelligent than other pupils of his age. In 1819 he went to the National Institute for Young Blind
People in Paris. There he learned to read using a system of raised wooden letters which blind readers felt
with their hands. This was difficult and terribly slow –most students when they finally finished reading a
sentence, could not remember how it had begun! As one of the best students, Louis won prizes for
mathematics, grammar and composition. However, what he found most interesting was the idea of
developing a new and better system to help blind people to read.
Several systems had already been tried out including carved wooden letters, wax sheets cut with a
writing knife and even string tied with special knots! In 1819, a French army officer, Charles Barbier, had
invented a system he called “night writing”, using dots and dashes pressed on paper. Barbier explained his
invention at the Institute in 1821, with twelve-year-old Louis Braille among his audience. But Braille was
blind and Barbier was not. Braille knew that dots were much easier than dashes to read, and he quickly
realized that “night writing” was too cumbersome, requiring as many as fourteen dots and dashes for one
letter.
The system that Braille came up with was brilliant because it was much simpler than Barbier’s and
simpler meant easier and quicker to read. Braille based his system on the position of the dots used for the
number six in dominoes.
He divided the alphabet into three groups with ten letters in each of the first two groups. The first ten
letters (A-J) used combinations of the dots numbers 1-4, as follows: A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I-J. The next ten
letters (k-t) used one simple adaptation in relation to the first ten: K-L-M-N-O-P-Q-R-S-T. The last five
letters (U-V-X-Y-Z) required a simple further adaptation, and one letter in the English alphabet was
omitted since it was not used in French.
The students at the Institute realized that Braille’s system was better than the one they were forced to
use, because it enabled them to read more quickly. But the authorities there were older and, they
thought, wiser than the students and they refused to accept a new system invented by a mere 20-year
old. The problem was that the authorities were not blind themselves.
Probably the Institute’s most brilliant graduate, Louis Braille died of tuberculosis on January 6th, 1852,
poor and almost unknown. But his system was not forgotten and was finally adopted by the Institute just
six months after Braille’s death. Within eight years it was finally adopted in the U.S.A; in 1868, Dr.
Armitage founded the English Braille Printing and Publishing House in London and later the system was
adapted for different alphabets in Russia, Egypt and China. It is still in use today, with computers having
made the process of turning text into Braille much faster and more efficient than before, Indeed, “Braille”
is now and international common noun, which is no longer written with the capital “B” that a proper noun
would require.
In 1852, Braille was buried quietly and without fanfare in Couvray, in 1952, in a dramatic and moving
ceremony, his body was transferred to the Pantheon in Paris, where France’s greatest heroes are interred.
UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA SANTA ROSA INGLÉS INSTRUMENTAL II
ESCUELA DE COMUNICACIÓN SOCIAL PROFESOR: MSC. JACINTO PABÓN
4th PERIOD