Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Part I Introduction
1 Surface
This book deals with the application of modern techniques to paint analysis, with a special
focus on surface analysis. If we pause to consider the word “surface”, we soon realise what
a relative and vague term it is. To a painter, “surface” does not mean the same as it does to
a surface chemist. To a painter, the surface represents that part of an object which is usually
presented to the outside world and can be touched and observed directly.
However, it can also be defined as the boundary layer between a solid or liquid material and a
surrounding liquid or gaseous phase. A surface physicist would probably refer to it as a phase
interface. Alternatively, it could be defined as the area of a solid or liquid thing at which the
bulk physical and chemical properties change instantly, a so-called property boundary.
A surface chemist, however, is talking about the uppermost molecular layers of a material
when he uses the word surface. This is an area that can’t be observed without the help of
analytical techniques. In fact, the uppermost layers of an object often determine the quality
and behaviour of the material as far as (paint) adhesion is concerned.
Definition of surface
So let’s first define how we shall use the word surface in this book. A surface is a boundary
layer which separates a substrate from the surrounding environment (air, liquid).
It is typically 1 nm to 1 µm thick. In contrast, a “thin layer” is defined as being 1 µm to
10 µm thick.
The surface plays a significant role in the physical and chemical properties of a material.
Let’s look, for example, at a toll manufacturer who paints and coats coils and metal profiles.
The surface of the raw material
might well look clean. However,
the material has a long history
before it has been delivered to
this company to be painted or
coated. Production, storage and
transport of a coil, for exam-
ple, afford much opportunity
for numerous substances to be
adsorbed onto the surface. This
surface layer of, say, contami-
nants may not be visible, but it
Roger Dietrich: Paint Analysis
Figure I-1: AFM (atomic force microscope) image of a paint © Copyright 2009 by Vincentz Network, Hannover, Germany
surface (60 x 60 µm) ISBN: 978-3-86630-912-8
is there nonetheless. And sometimes even traces of contaminants can seriously impair the
adhesion of a coating to a surface.
When it comes to processing of the coil, the chemical composition of the outermost molecular
layer plays a significant role. If the coil has been coated with a protective layer of oils to pre-
vent corrosion during transport and storage, the paint will exhibit poor adhesion or craters
after application. Even a monomolecular layer of some of these oils can have deleterious
effects on coating procedures.
As these ultra thin layers are invisible, the unfortunate manufacturer is in fact “blind” as
far as the surface quality of his coils is concerned. In most cases, therefore, he will decide
to install a cleaning process before applying the coating. But he will do so without knowing
if it is necessary and, even worse, without knowing what to remove from the surface. Unfor-
tunately, there is no “magic” process for eliminating all the various kinds of contaminants.
His efforts might well produce a surface quality worse than before, due to the presence of oil
residues and traces of cleaning chemicals, such as surfactants.
The same is true of the coating material itself. As the paint and the painted substrate have
to be a chemical match if good adhesion is to be obtained, a few questions need to be asked
before the painting process is started.
Unfortunately, these questions often can’t be answered by simple tests or classical chemical
analysis because they require an ability to analyse tiny amounts of substances that have high
surface sensitivity. Only the surface analysis techniques described in this book can answer
these questions
A growing field of application for modern surface analytical techniques is not only paint
application but also paint production. Modern high-performance paints have to fulfil many
requirements simultaneously that are sometimes hard to match. This not only creates a
demand for characterisation of the raw materials and products. The chemical interaction of
paint compounds and the reaction between each compound and the ingredients of the sub-
strate (e.g. a polymer) are also key parameters.
If, for example, a moulded polymer part has to be coated, it is not just the polymer which is
of interest. The manufacturer or supplier of the raw material matches the original polymer to
customer demands. In accordance with the requirements imposed on the polymer material,
he adds additives to improve flame, light, impact or heat resistance. One parameter the sup-
plier is not concerned about is the paintability of the product made from the granules which
he supplies. That is a process which the polymer supplier does not see.
However, it has been shown in the past that additives present in polymers “designed” to
enhance moulding processes, especially in the offering good release from injection moulds,
can prove disastrous for the painting process. Most of the additives incorporated into a
polymer migrate to the surface, driven by temperature, humidity, time or solvents. This
sometimes leads to unpredictable results, such as paint adhesion failure, chemical reactions,
discoloration, and wetting failure. Many manufacturers of paint for automotive interior parts
have therefore discovered that it is essential not only to know their own paint manufacturing
process, but also to learn something about the polymers which have to be painted. This is a
task that can easily be fulfilled by the techniques we are going to describe in this book.
This is an analytical gap that can be closed by the surface analytical techniques described
in this book. They will help to answer the question: Why does a product have unexpected
properties and why do failures happen?
It should be mentioned that there is no all-embracing technique that can answer these ques-
tions. In fact, there are many parameters which influence the decision as to which technique
to employ for the analysis, including:
• additional information about the appearance of the defect
• preliminary sample investigation by optical light microscopy
• chemical and physical properties of the coating
• Desired detection limit
In other words, it takes an experienced user to find the best tool that can answer the ques-
tions raised about the sample. These considerations will be discussed later in this book.
Figure I-2: General concept of probing the surface of a sample with radiation
The sample is essentially analysed by radiation that probes for specific properties and char-
acteristics of the material. This radiation, which is called the primary radiation, can consist of
electrons, ions, neutral particles and photons, such as infrared waves and X-rays. The primary
radiation triggers a reaction specific to the sample that may take the form of the emission of
electrons, ions or X-rays. This “reaction” by the sample is detected by an electronic system
composed of an analyser and a detector. The result can be displayed as a spectrum on a com-
puter or be printed on paper. The last step of the process is data evaluation by an experienced
analyst. The evaluation must include
• plausibility check
• comparison with databases
• interpretation with respect to the analytical problem
The nature of the interaction which occurs between the probing beam and the sample
depends on the type, energy and angle of incidence of the probing radiation and, of course,
the sample material.
Figure I-3: Interaction between the primary radiation and the sample
The primary radiation interacts with the sample in a specific way. Each type of sample reac-
tion can be detected separately and analysed to reveal the chemical and physical composi-
tion of the sample and its surface. The radiation emitted by the sample is called secondary
radiation. Each type of primary radiation can produce a different type of secondary radiation.
Probing with an electron beam, for example, may lead to the formation of:
• secondary electrons
• X-rays
• back-scattered electrons
• fluorescence
Each type of radiation conveys different information about the sample that all adds up to a
comprehensive understanding of the sample’s properties. Not only the primary radiation, but
the secondary radiation emitted by the sample, too, can consist of electrons, ions, neutral par-
ticles and photons that result from sample excitation or reflection of the primary radiation.
The latter is a consequence of diffraction and dispersion that change the energy, angle and
intensity of the primary radiation in accordance with the topography, structure and chemical
composition of the sample. The secondary radiation emanating from the sample is detected,
analysed and displayed in the form of an angle-, energy- or mass-resolved spectrum, which
contains information about the sample and its surface.
The various types of probing primary radiation and detected secondary radiation have
spawned more than 50 different analytical techniques over the decades. Some of them are
useful for solving practical problems and have made their way into routine work. Many of
them, however, never passed the experimental stage and have very limited application to
technical samples outside of academia.
In this book, we will cover those techniques which have proven to be very useful for routine
work and can deliver data in a reasonable time and at reasonable cost.
The in Table I-1 (page 16) mentioned techniques yield different data about the sample. Each
has its particular strengths and weaknesses. It is very important to appreciate this when try-
ing to find the right combination for the given analytical problem. It is commonly said that
one technique on its own is no use and so a combination is the best way of achieving the right
results. The parameters to know about a technique are its
• information depth
• detection limits
• information content
• suitability for technical problems
Some techniques, for example, allow only very limited sample sizes, which sometimes
renders the technique useless for “real world samples”. Others require vacuum conditions,
and that excludes liquid or volatile samples. Only a handful of techniques have proven useful
for routine work. The limiting features are:
Infrared IRM
microscopy
Another important question is the sample area to be analysed. If, for example, a paint crater
a few microns in diameter has to be analysed for possible surface contaminants capable of
causing cratering, the technique
to use must allow for spot analy-
sis. This means the investigation
of a very small spot with a lateral
resolution of a few microns.
1.3 Instrumentation
Many of the analytical techniques we will describe here require vacuum conditions. Although
they differ greatly in detail and in their chemical background, the instrumentation used fol-
lows a general concept.
The instrumentation setup for all techniques consists of an excitation system (the primary
system) that generates photons, electrons or ions. The primary beam is directed by a focusing
system onto the sample surface and into the desired area. Some techniques have an additional
sputtering system (e.g. an ion gun) that allows for subsequent sputtering of layers and thus
for depth profiling. After interaction of the primary beam with the sample (surface), the
excited secondary radiation is collected by a ray optics system which directs the secondary
beam towards the analyser. The analyser separates the secondary radiation spectroscopically
by energy, direction or mass. The detector records the separated or resolved signals and
measures their intensity. The signals generated by it are displayed as a spectrum, which is
a chart of intensity versus wavelength, mass, or energy.
The basic theory of light microscopy (LM) has been described elsewhere and will not be
repeated in this book. However, it is worth focusing on a special method of LM that was
developed a few years ago and offers highly interesting possibilities with respect to material
surfaces.
Figure II-1: Painted key panel showing paint adhesion failure after
Roger Dietrich: Paint Analysis
laser treatment; A= light microscopy image of the border between © Copyright 2009 by Vincentz Network, Hannover, Germany
lasered symbol and paint, B= EFI-3D image of the same area ISBN: 978-3-86630-912-8
A main disadvantage of conventional light microscopy is the lack of depth of focus. At high
resolution, rough material surfaces, such as those of structured polymers or metals, cannot
be inspected both very sharply and at high resolution at the same time. Therefore, in the
past, a scanning electron microscope had to be used to scan the surface topography of rough
and structured samples, even for low-resolution purposes.
Thanks to the latest developments in digital cameras and software solutions, the depth of
focus of light microscopy can be extended virtually by a so-called EFI option (Extended Focal
Imaging). This is one module of the image-processing software “AnalySIS” developed by
the company SIS/Olympus. It automatically takes pictures of several focal planes in rough
objects, extracts only the sharp details of each focal plane and adds them together to produce
an image of unlimited depth of focus.
Figure II-2: Light microscopy image of a paint crater (top) and calculated EFI-3D image of the same paint
failure
It is thus an easy matter to obtain topographical images of extremely rough surfaces or paint
failure without the help of scanning electron microscopy for magnifications of less than
x1000. This additionally permits the layer thickness and topography to be measured.
2 Infrared spectroscopy
Infrared spectroscopy (IR) is an analytical tool that has been well known for decades but
only lent itself to routine work with the application of Fourier transform to data process-
ing. The basic principle of IR spectroscopy is the structural characterization of materials
through the absorption of infrared radiation by inter-atomic bonds. A defined wavelength
range is scanned with infrared light to yield a collection of absorption information which
can be displayed as bands in an infrared spectrum. The spectrum is evaluated by compari-
son with reference spectra and by examining the individual peaks to identify the various
functional groups in the molecule or material, such as esters, hydrocarbons, acids, amines
and the like.
2.1 Physical
background
The probe used in IR spectros-
copy is radiation from the infra-
red region of the electromagnetic
spectrum. This corresponds to
energies between 0.001 and 1.6
eV. These photons excite char-
Figure II-3: Basic principle of infrared spectroscopy acteristic vibrations of the inter-
atomic bonds in a molecule.
The energy needed to excite the
vibrations is absorbed from the
incident infrared radiation.