345-000926-CR-004 REV.1 - Pier Head

P.O.
BOX 23439
DOHA, QATAR
TEL. NO. +974 44500628
FAX NO. +974 44500608
STATIC CALCULATION FOR

PIER HEAD FORMWORK
SPECIAL STEEL MOULDS
+
SUPPORTING CONSTRUCTION FRAMES
“UNIVERSAL”
DOCUMENT NO : 345
345-000926-CR-004 REV. 1
PROJECT : Green Line Elevated & At-Grade
CLIENT : SBG
SBG-PORR-HBK
SUBMITTED BY : JOERY T. VILLEGAS

Sr. Project Technician ______________________
signature
CHECKED BY : OLEGS SOKOLOVS

SOKOLOV ______________________
Deputy Head of Engineering signature
APPROVED BY : WOLFGANG BERGER ______________________

Head of Engineering signature
SUBMITTED DATE : 15 June 2015

PARTICULAR MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE REF: 345-000926-CR-004
VIADUCT PIER HEAD FORMWORK REV. 1
STATIC CALCULATION REPORT

GREEN LINE ELEVATED DATE 15-06-15
& AT-GRADE PAGE 1 of 63
CONTENTS
PAGE
1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION................................................................................................................................... 2

1.1 REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS ..................................................................................................................... 2
1.2 DESIGN DATA: ..................................................................................................................................................... 2
1.3 CALCULATOR FOR FRESH CONCRETE PRESSURE: ...................................................................................... 3
2.0 FORMWORKS OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................. 4

2.1 ELEVATION .......................................................................................................................................................... 4
3.0 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ............................................................................................................................... 5
4.0 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS FOR FORMWORK ................................................................................................... 8

4.1 CHECK 5MM THICK STEEL PLATE .................................................................................................................... 8
4.2 CHECK HORIZONTAL RIBS ................................................................................................................................ 9
4.2.1 panels type 2 & 3 ............................................................................................................................................. 9
4.2.2 panel type 1 ................................................................................................................................................... 16
4.3 CHECK VERTICAL RIBS ...................................................................................................................................... 22
4.3.1 panels type 2 & 3 ........................................................................................................................................... 22
4.3.2 panel type 1 ................................................................................................................................................... 25
4.4 CHECK BOTTOM ANCHOR WALER ................................................................................................................... 29
4.4.1 panel type 2 ................................................................................................................................................... 29
4.4.2 panel type 1 ................................................................................................................................................... 30
4.5 CHECK LIFTING BRACKETS ............................................................................................................................... 32
4.5.1 LOAD ASSUMPTION .................................................................................................................................... 32
4.5.2 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS FOR LIFTING LOOP .......................................................................................... 33
5.0 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS FOR SUPPORTING PLATFORM ............................................................................. 35

5.1 LOAD ASSUMPTION ............................................................................................................................................ 35
5.2 SUPPORTING REACTIONS ON PLATFORM MEMBERS ................................................................................... 36
5.3 CHECK SUPPORTING CONSTRUCTION FRAME TYPE 2................................................................................. 52
5.3.1 PIER HEAD SUPPORT ANCHORING / SUPPORTING LOADS .................................................................. 54
5.4 CHECK SUPPORTING CONSTRUCTION FRAME TYPE 1................................................................................. 55
5.4.1 PIER HEAD SUPPORT ANCHORING / SUPPORTING LOADS .................................................................. 56
6.0 ATTACHMENT 1 .................................................................................................................................................. 58

COMPARISON OF SUPPORTING REACTION VALUES ................................................................................................... 58
1

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1 REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS
• All calculations, calculation table, design and permissible loading as well as approved loading
capacities for DOKA Formwork System parts are based on German Standards DIN; QCS 2010 or
EN.
• Calculation for Doka Formwork System Parts shown in this Structural Analysis are based on the
worst loadings (max. spacing and max. loading of formwork items).
• All deflections in the middle field of Formwork System parts are restricted to maximum 1/500 or
1/350 of span.
• For Form Ties System Max. permissible load ability with 1.6 safety factor against breaking load
• For further details and DOKA Product Information please refer to Work method statement
“Large-area Top 50 system”, “Doka Supporting construction frame” & shop drawings
• Concrete Pressure Pmax. = 75kN/m² for Pier Head.
• Normal Concrete will be used, with consistency D , very soft concrete as per DIN 18218
• Concrete Pressure Pmax. = 75kN/m² is hydrostatic, therefore concrete placing speed is not relevant
(check with “calculator for fresh concrete pressure “for actual concrete temperature” ).
http://www.doka.com/web/tools/calculator/index.en.html
1.2 DESIGN DATA:

Pouring Ht. = 3.00m
Formwork Ht. = 3.15m
Reinforced Concrete Weight = 25 kN/m³
Pouring Concrete Pressure = 75 kN/m² (Max.)
2

1.3 CALCULATOR FOR FRESH CONCRETE PRESSURE:
http://www.doka.com/web/tools/calculator/index.en.html
Where:
Tc, ref: Temperature in ºc of fresh concrete, which was the basis for the calculation of the setting on final set
tE.
tE: Time in hours from the first input of water until the fresh concrete reaches the end of setting / final set.
Tc, placing: Temperature in ºc of the fresh concrete directly after placing it into the formwork.
3

2.0 FORMWORKS OVERVIEW

2.1 ELEVATION
Front view:
Side view:
4

Concrete volume
3.0 IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Additional to the drawings information it should be taken in consideration also the user information
“LARGE-AREA FORMWORK TOP 50 System” & “Doka Supporting construction frame”
Live load is calculated as per the EN 12812 min. 1.5KN/m2
Working wind is 64.4 km/h
Max. wind is 129 km/h at 8 to 20m above ground as per DIN 1055, Part 4
In the situation of assembling and storm wind, the supporting structure has to be saved against
overturning and slippage by site (load combination 1 = LC1).
The concreting has to be done in equal layers.
The calculation is done for the max utilized components only.
The structural calculation is based on the EN12812. In the calculation are following safety
parameter included:
Partial safety factor for loads γF

for variable actions γF = 1.5
(this factor is incorporated on the material side for each DOKA product / design
diagram or table)
Partial safety factor for material γM
Steel: γM = 1.1
wood (according to EN 1995-1-1)

γM = 1.3 , kmod = 0.9
5

Design explanation to the Software TIP BEAM used by DOKA
The software TIP BEAM STATICS is an own product of DOKA

The partial safety factor for loads γF is incorporated on the material side
Following verifications are incorporated in the TIP BEAM STATIC software:
Shear stress
Bending moment
Deflection
Additional documentation / software used for the calculation:
User information Large-Area Top 50 Formworks

User information Doka Supporting construction frame
DOKA calculation guide (internal documentation)
RStab 7
6

Product information according to EN 1993

Steel plates in use:
-) Steel sheet (form face): 5 mm
-) Horizontal steel ribs: 8 mm x 100 mm (h)
-) Vertical steel ribs: 10 mm x 120 mm (h)
Steel quality:
7

4.0 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS FOR FORMWORK

4.1 CHECK 5MM THICK STEEL PLATE
Design Parameters:
a. steel plate = 5mm thk.

b. Design max. concrete pressure = 75 KN/m2
c. Maximum support spacing = 250mm
Permissible Moment (elastic) of 5mm steel plate:

100 0,5 27,5
= = 0.69 /
6 1.1 1.50
Figure 01: 5mm steel plate support spacing
MEd = 0.46 kNm/m
ಶ೏ .
= = 0.67 < 1.00
ೃ೏ .
Utilization = 67%
8

4.2 CHECK HORIZONTAL RIBS

Design Parameters:
steel ribs: 8 mm x 100 mm (h)

,
27,5
= = = 16.7 / 2
1.1 1.50
,
27,5
= = = 9.6 / 2
√3 1.1 1.50√3
= 100.8 = 8.0 2

0.8103
, = = 66.7 4
12
66,7
, = = 13.34 3
5
=
, = 16,713,34 = 222,8 = 2,23
2
= = 51,2
3
4.2.1 PANELS TYPE 2 & 3
Figure 02: support spacing of horizontal rib (Panel 2 & 3)
9

Check MEd & deflection for all areas with different concrete pressure and rib spacing (referring to Figure 02):
Area 1 (A1):
Q = P x e = 75 x 0,25 = 19 kN/m
= , ;
Permissible deflections as per DOKA standard:

In field / span = L/500 = 885 mm / 500 = 1.77 mm
Deflection perm > │Deflection actual

1.77 > 0.10 mm OK!
10

Area 2 (A2):
Q = P x e = 62,5 x 0,27 = 16,9 kN/m
= ,


2.05 > 0.20 mm OK!
11

Area 3 (A3):
Q = P x e = 50 x 0,3 = 15 kN/m
= ,


2.30 > 0.20 mm OK!
12

Area 4 (A4):
Q = P x e = 37,5 x 0,4 = 15 kN/m
= ,


2.30 > 0.20 mm OK!
13

Area 5 (A5):
Q = P x e = 25 x 0,4 = 10 kN/m
= ,


2.43 > 0.30 mm OK!
14

Area 6 (A6):
Q = P x e = 12,5 x 0,4 = 5 kN/m
= ,


3.32 > 0.60 mm OK!
MEd, Max = 2.22 kNm/m
ಶ೏ ,
= = 1.00
ೃ೏ ,
Utilization = 100%
15

4.2.2 PANEL TYPE 1

Design Parameters:
steel ribs: 8 mm x 100 mm (h)
Figure 03: support spacing of horizontal rib (Panel 1)
16

Check MEd & deflection for all areas with different concrete pressure and rib spacing (referring to Figure 03):
Area 1 (A1):
Q = P x e = 75 x 0,25 = 19 kN/m
= ,


1.87 > 0.20 mm OK!
17

Area 2 (A2):
Q = P x e = 62,5 x 0,27 = 16,9 kN/m
= ,


2.10 > 0.10 mm OK!
18

Area 3 (A3):
Q = P x e = 50 x 0,3 = 15 kN/m
= ,


2.10 > 0.10 mm OK!
19

Area 4 (A4):
Q = P x e = 37,5 x 0,4 = 15 kN/m
= ,


2.30 > 0.20 mm OK!
20

Area 5 (A5):
Q = P x e = 25 x 0,4 = 10 kN/m
= ,


2.50 > 0.20 mm OK!
ಶ೏ ,
= = 0,93
ೃ೏ ,
Utilization = 93%
21

4.3 CHECK VERTICAL RIBS

Design Parameters:
2 steel ribs: 10 mm x 120 mm (h)

,
27,5
= = = 16.7 / 2
1.1 1.50
,
27,5
= = = 9.6 / 2
√3 1.1 1.50√3
= 121.02 = 24.0 2

1.0123
, = 2 = 288,0 4
12
288,0
, = = 48.0 3
6
=
, = 16,748,0 = 801,6 = 8,02
2
= = 153,6
3
4.3.1 PANELS TYPE 2 & 3
Figure 04: Concrete Pressure influence on MIDDLE vertical rib (Panel 2 & 3) & Support spacing
22

Figure 05: Concrete Pressure influence on EDGE vertical rib (Panel 2 & 3) & Support spacing
Check MEd (referring to Figure 04):

A. In field / span = L/500 = 1010 mm / 500 = 2.02 mm
B. Cantilever = L/250 = 960 mm / 250 = 3.84 mm

A. 2.02 > 0.70 mm OK!
B. 3.84 > 3.5 mm (6 mm deflection is at the end part of the member) OK!
23



A. 2.66 > 0.80 mm OK!
B. 1.64 > 0.1 mm OK!
ಶ೏ ,
= = 0,89
ೃ೏ ,
Utilization = 89%
24

4.3.2 PANEL TYPE 1
1 2 3 4
4
3
2
1
Figure 06: Vertical Rib Support spacing (Panel 1)

Rib 1:


A. 3.05 > 1.00 mm OK!
25

Rib 2:


A. 3.05 > 1.10 mm OK!
26

Rib 3:


A. 2.36 > 0.90 mm OK!
B. 3.46 > 0.10 mm OK!
27

Rib 4:


A. 1.36 > 0.10 mm OK!
B. 2.54 > 1.20 mm OK!
ಶ೏ ,
= = 0,94
ೃ೏ ,
Utilization = 94%
28

4.4 CHECK BOTTOM ANCHOR WALER

4.4.1 PANEL TYPE 2
Waler influence:
e=250+1025 / 2=763mm
Result Concrete pressure:

PRez = 63 kN/m2
Figure 07: Reactions from Vertical Ribs (Panel 2) at anchor waling level
29

Verification Anchor Waler WU16
Mperm > │max. MEk│ 31.90 > 31.10 KN-m OK!

Qperm > │max. QEk │ 161.00 > 42.50 KN OK!


A. 4.20 > 3.10 mm OK!
4.4.2 PANEL TYPE 1

Waler influence:
e=50+1065 / 2=583mm
Result Concrete pressure:

PRez = 69 kN/m2
30

Figure 08: Reactions from Vertical Ribs (Panel 1) at anchor waling level
Verification Anchor Waler WU16



A. 4.20 > 3.20 mm OK!
31

4.5 CHECK LIFTING BRACKETS

4.5.1 LOAD ASSUMPTION
Lifting Pier head mould as one unit:
- During transportation
Panels:
2 x Type 1 = 2775 kgs x 2 = 5550 kgs
2 x Type 2 = 1500 kgs x 2 = 3000 kgs
2 x Type 3 = 400 kgs x 2 = 800 kgs
______________________________
Total weight for 8 lifting loops: 9350 kgs
Lifting mould panel with supporting structure attached:

- During stripping / erection
Panels:
1 x Type 2 = 1500 kgs
1 x Type 3 = 400 kgs
Supporting structure:
1690 kgs
______________________________
Total weight: 3590 kgs
Considering lifting point arrangement,

total weight will be distributed between the
lifting loops and WU200 Lifting profile in the
following ratio:
1/3 – to WU200 Lifting profile
2/3 – to lifting hooks
Take worst case scenario, when all the weight
is taken by loops:
Total weight for 2 lifting loops: 3590 kgs
Maximum expected load on 1 lifting loop:

=
32

4.5.2 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS FOR LIFTING LOOP
Product information according to EN 1993

Steel plates in use:
-) Steel sheet (form face): 5 mm
-) Horizontal steel ribs: 8 mm x 100 mm (h)
-) Vertical steel ribs: 10 mm x 120 mm (h)
Steel quality:
Cross-section data of the welds:

A= 3 x 10 x 0,3 + 9 x 0,3 = 11,7cm2
FEd = 1800 x 1,5 = 2700 kgs = 27 kN
ಶ೏

= = = 2,31 /
,
‫ݕ ݓ‬,݇ 0,9527,5
= !‫ ܯ‬
=
1.1
= 23.8 / 2

2,31
= = 0,1

23,8
Utilization = 10%
33

steel plate: 15 mm
27,5
=
‫ݕ‬,݇
= = 16.7 / 2
!‫ܨ! ܯ‬ 1.1 1.50
c
27,5
=
‫ݕ‬,݇
= = 9.6 / 2
!‫√ ܨ! ܯ‬3 1.1 1.50√3
a
, = 2,51,52 = 7,5 2
,
= 4,01,5 = 6,0 2
",# = ,# = 16,77,5 = 125,3

",$ = , = 9,66,0 = 57,6
ಶ೏ ,
= = 0,47
ೃ೏ ,
Utilization = 47%
34

5.0 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS FOR SUPPORTING PLATFORM

5.1 LOAD ASSUMPTION
The following loads are considered in below calculation:
- Steel mould self weight (as per actual production drawings) 1,2 kN/m²
- Standard Doka elements self weight (as per Doka weight list)
- Reinforced Concrete Weight 25 kN/m³
- Pouring Concrete Pressure (Max.) 75 kN/m²
- LL on top of concrete during pouring 2,0 kN/m²
- LL on top perimeter working platform 1,5 kN/m²
Load transfer is calculated with RStab software and result supporting reactions are applied to the
supporting platform members.
*Supporting reaction summarized value from software is compared against geometrical value
(see attachment)
Figure 09: Rstab model for Platform Type 2
35

Figure 10: Rstab model for Platform Type 1
5.2 SUPPORTING REACTIONS ON PLATFORM MEMBERS
Figure 11: Supporting reactions for Panel 2 Central rib (LC1: full load)
36

Figure 12: Supporting reactions for Panel 2 Central rib (LC2: without concrete pressure)
Figure 13: Supporting reactions for Panel 2 Edge rib (LC1: full load)
37

Figure 14: Supporting reactions for Panel 2 Edge rib (LC2: without concrete pressure)
38

Check load on Panel 2 supporting spindles - Universal spindle foot T8

Maximum vertical loads are from LC 2:
Max load on Universal spindle foot T8: 59.8 kN < 80 kN (allowable)
39

Check distribution profile WU12 under supporting spindles
Verification distribution profile WU12



A. 2.10 > 0.40 mm OK!
40

Check distribution profile under T7 spindle struts and distribution profile WU12
- distribution profile under Central Rib (LC1: full load)
41

- distribution profile under Central Rib (LC2: without concrete pressure)
- distribution profile under Edge Rib (LC1: full load)
42

- distribution profile under Edge Rib (LC2: without concrete pressure)
Support reaction Vertical components are transferred to the Supporting Construction frame trough
IPB180 / IPE180 distribution profiles (see attachment for these profiles structural prove).
43

It is not allowed to transfer horizontal loads to the horizontal Supporting Construction frame, therefore
horizontal components of Support reactions are terminated by interconnecting distribution profiles with a
help of tie rods.
44

Check distribution profile WU12 for horizontal load transfer

From RStab:
Max Horizontal load at Central Rib (LC1: full load):

H = 88,1 kN
Max Horizontal load at Edge Rib (LC1: full load):

H = 55,0 kN
45




A. 3.64 > 1.80 mm OK!
Verification Tie rod 20.0
As shown in Beam static, maximum load on tie = 99.10 kN

Max Tie rod Load = 99.10 kN < 220kN OK!
46

Check load on Panel 1 supporting spindles - Universal spindle foot T8

Maximum vertical loads are from LC 2:
- Steel mould self weight (as per actual production drawings) 1,2 kN/m²
- Reinforced Concrete Weight 25 kN/m³
3
3,47 m of concrete
- LL on top of concrete during pouring 2,0 kN/m²
- LL on top perimeter working platform 1,5 kN/m²
________________________________________________________________________
Total vertical load from Panel 1: 175,1 kN
(see attachment for
Comparison of Supporting reaction summarized value from software against geometrical value)
Load distribution from Panel 1 on supporting spindles - Universal spindle foot T8
47

Max load on Universal spindle foot T8: 60.1 kN < 80 kN (allowable)
Check distribution profile WU12 under supporting spindles
48




A. 2.00 > 0.70 mm (3 mm deflection is at the end part of the member) OK!
49

Check distribution profile WS10 under Panel struts
Panel struts are used for panel alignment only and will not take load from concrete weight / concrete
pressure. Due to a complex mould shape, it is not possible to verify the exact load distribution to these
panel struts, therefore maximum allowable load is considered for below calculation.
50

Verification distribution profile WS10



A. 2.00 > 0.30 mm OK!
51

5.3 CHECK SUPPORTING CONSTRUCTION FRAME TYPE 2.
- Vertical loads from IPB180 / IPE180 distribution profiles (LC1: full load)
- Vertical loads from IPB180 / IPE180 distribution profiles (LC2: without concrete pressure)
52

Verification Supporting construction frame

- Utilization (LC1: full load)
- Utilization (LC2: without concrete pressure)
Utilization = 95%
53

5.3.1 PIER HEAD SUPPORT ANCHORING / SUPPORTING LOADS
LC1: full load LC2: without concrete pressure
54

5.4 CHECK SUPPORTING CONSTRUCTION FRAME TYPE 1.
- Vertical loads from WU12 / WS10 distribution profiles
Verification Supporting construction frame

- Utilization
Utilization = 17%
55

5.4.1 PIER HEAD SUPPORT ANCHORING / SUPPORTING LOADS
56

Anchoring loads are UNFACTORED / CHARACTERISTIC
57

6.0 ATTACHMENT 1
COMPARISON OF SUPPORTING REACTION VALUES
Vertical load summary (from geometry); considering distribution on panels:
Area 1
3,07 m3
15,08 m3
3,07 m3
Area 2
Considered as additional load for Panel 2 Edge rib *
Considered as load for Panel 1
* Except Panel self weight and LL on platform
Load distribution at Panel 1
58

Panel 2 _ Central Rib:

- Steel mould self weight (as per actual production drawings):
2
Panel 2 + Panel 3 = 5,9 m x 1,15m = 6,8 m
6,8 x 94 = 639,2 kg = 6,4 kN
- Reinforced Concrete Weight:
2 3
5,75 m x 1,15m = 6,62 m
6,62 x 25 = 165,5 kN
- LL on top of concrete during pouring:
4 x 1,15 x 2,0 = 9,2 kN
- LL on top perimeter working platforms:
1 x 1,15 x 1,5 = 1,73 kN
∑ Vertical load _Central Rib: 182,8 kN
Supporting reactions for Panel 2 Central rib (LC1: full load)
Supporting reactions for Panel 2 Central rib (LC2: without concrete pressure)
59

Panel 2 _ Edge Rib:

(1900kg - 639,2 kg) / 2 = 630,4 kg = 6,3 kN
3
(15,08 - 6,62 m ) / 2 x 25 = 105,8 kN
3,74 x 2,0 = 7,5 kN
2,25 x 1,5 = 3,38 kN
Additional load from Panel 1 cantilevered part
3
3,07 m x 25 = 76,8 kN
4,03 x 2,0 = 8,1 kN
84,9 / 5,9 = 14,4 kN / m
14,4 x 3,25 = 46,7 kN – additional for Panel 2 Edge rib
∑ Vertical load Edge Rib: 123,0 + 46,7 = 169,7 kN (1 side only)

169,7 x 2 = 339,4 (total from 2 Edge ribs)
60

Supporting reactions for Panel 2 Edge rib (LC1: full load)
Supporting reactions for Panel 2 Edge rib (LC2: without concrete pressure)
∑ Vertical load _Middle Rib: 168,5 kN
61

Panel 1:
Panel 1 = 2775 kg = 27,8 kN
3,47 x 25 = 86,8 kN
1,96 x 1,7 x 2,0 = 6,67 kN
5,0 x 1,5 = 7,5 kN
14,4 x 2,66 = 38,3 kN – for Panel 1
∑ Vertical load_Panel 1: 128,8 + 38,3 = 167,1 kN

167,1 / 2 = 83,6 (1 side only)
Supporting reactions for Panel 1
62

Vertical load summary (from geometry); total:

(Panel 1 + Panel 2 + Panel 3) x 2 = (2775 +1500 + 400) x 2 = 9350 kg = 93,5 kN
3 3
(58,1 m – 8,67 m ) x 25 = 1235,8 kN
51,7 x 2,0 = 103,4 kN
34,7 x 1,5 = 52,1 kN
∑ Vertical load : 1484,8 kN

∑ Vertical load
: 1512,8 kN
∑ Vertical load ,

∑ Vertical load

=
,
= 0,98 < 1,0 OK!
63

345-000926-CR-004 REV.1 - Pier Head

Încărcat de

Informații document

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

345-000926-CR-004 REV.1 - Pier Head

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

P.O.

STATIC CALCULATION FOR

PROJECT : Green Line Elevated & At-Grade

SUBMITTED BY : JOERY T. VILLEGAS

CHECKED BY : OLEGS SOKOLOVS

APPROVED BY : WOLFGANG BERGER ______________________

SUBMITTED DATE : 15 June 2015

VIADUCT PIER HEAD FORMWORK REV. 1

STATIC CALCULATION REPORT

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION................................................................................................................................... 2

2.0 FORMWORKS OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................. 4

3.0 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ............................................................................................................................... 5

4.0 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS FOR FORMWORK ................................................................................................... 8

5.0 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS FOR SUPPORTING PLATFORM ............................................................................. 35

6.0 ATTACHMENT 1 .................................................................................................................................................. 58

VIADUCT PIER HEAD FORMWORK REV. 1

STATIC CALCULATION REPORT

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

1.2 DESIGN DATA:

VIADUCT PIER HEAD FORMWORK REV. 1

STATIC CALCULATION REPORT

1.3 CALCULATOR FOR FRESH CONCRETE PRESSURE:

VIADUCT PIER HEAD FORMWORK REV. 1

STATIC CALCULATION REPORT

2.0 FORMWORKS OVERVIEW

VIADUCT PIER HEAD FORMWORK REV. 1

STATIC CALCULATION REPORT

3.0 IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Partial safety factor for loads γF

Partial safety factor for material γM

wood (according to EN 1995-1-1)

VIADUCT PIER HEAD FORMWORK REV. 1

STATIC CALCULATION REPORT

Design explanation to the Software TIP BEAM used by DOKA

The software TIP BEAM STATICS is an own product of DOKA

Additional documentation / software used for the calculation:

User information Large-Area Top 50 Formworks

VIADUCT PIER HEAD FORMWORK REV. 1

STATIC CALCULATION REPORT

Product information according to EN 1993

VIADUCT PIER HEAD FORMWORK REV. 1

STATIC CALCULATION REPORT

4.0 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS FOR FORMWORK

a. steel plate = 5mm thk.

Permissible Moment (elastic) of 5mm steel plate:

Figure 01: 5mm steel plate support spacing

MEd = 0.46 kNm/m

VIADUCT PIER HEAD FORMWORK REV. 1

STATIC CALCULATION REPORT

4.2 CHECK HORIZONTAL RIBS

steel ribs: 8 mm x 100 mm (h)

 = 100.8 = 8.0 2

4.2.1 PANELS TYPE 2 & 3

Figure 02: support spacing of horizontal rib (Panel 2 & 3)

VIADUCT PIER HEAD FORMWORK REV. 1

STATIC CALCULATION REPORT

Permissible deflections as per DOKA standard:

Deflection perm > │Deflection actual

VIADUCT PIER HEAD FORMWORK REV. 1

STATIC CALCULATION REPORT

Permissible deflections as per DOKA standard:

Deflection perm > │Deflection actual

VIADUCT PIER HEAD FORMWORK REV. 1

STATIC CALCULATION REPORT

= 100.8 = 8.0 2

= 121.02 = 24.0 2