IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT ALEXANDRIA VIRGINIA

)
In The Matter Of ) THIS COURTS CASE #
Janice wolk Grenadier’s debtor ) no. 17 – 13354 BFk
Forced Involuntary Chapter 13 Bankruptcy )
) 1:16 -cv- 01461 CMH-IDD
SEEKING RELIEF FROM ALLEGED CREDITORS ) Jury Trial Requested as
FRAUDS ON THE COURT AND BY THE COURT ) Judge Kennedy Has Refused To Recuse
As A Disenfranchised Debtor/Victim ) Himself For Past Misconduct Of Office
) related cases, Case ;17 – CV –
) 00166 – TSE – MSN Intervener
George Mc Dermott As Creditor/ ) 1; 14 – CV – 1400 – TSE / TCB
Next Friend Of The Court/Creditor Permissive Intervener ) False imprisonment by court
________________________________________________________________________________________

INTERVENER’S MOTION TO STRIKE THE PURPORTED ORDER OF THIS COURT NOVEMBER 6, 2017 AND
SUBMITTING AN AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH REFUTING THE COURT’S ALLEGED ALLEGATIONS AS THEY ARE NOT
SUPPORTED BY THE RECORDS OF THIS COURT OR ANY COURT AND ARE REFUTED BY INTERVENER’S
VIDEO AFFIDAVITS POSTED @SECRETJUSTICE.COM WHERE OVER 120 OF DEBTOR’S VIDEOS ARE POSTED
RELIEF IS SOUGHT FROM A BRA PANEL RULES 5004 (A) 5007 (A) ,5008 (b), 28 USC § 158 (b) + 8009 – 10.

Comes now George E. McDermott reporter for Maryland court NEWS/creditor here after
intervener through the motion practice of this court having received the court’s latest unsigned
document reportedly dismissing the debtor’s appeal and denying intervener’s motion to the court
once again to correct the record to prevent a gross miscarriage of justice and fraud on the court as
well as by the court against the debtor and her family under color of law and authority and
especially in light of the criminal misconduct of the judge of this court who authored and 9 page
fictitious order alleging criminal misconduct on part of the debtor was false statements disproven
by the records in direct violation of his oath of office under US CONST. Art.6 Sec. 1 – 3 entitled.

2. Intervener is filing this affidavit under penalty of perjury in opposition to the latest
purported order of Brian K Kennedy disputing this alleged Judicial officers findings of fact and
conclusions of law in the unsigned November 6, 2017(ECF, Doc # 48 P, 1 - 102 which contains false
allegations of misconduct, false statements and false records placed into the court by adversaries
1
Page

of justice and court insiders committing treason against the Constitution and their oath of office as
outlined under title 18 United States code 18 U.S.C.§ 2381 – 2386, statements in this 9 page piece
of fictitious writing is not supported by US code this voluntary affidavit is citizen George
McDermott’s latest attempt to prevent a gross miscarriage of justice by yet more court officers
violating their oath of office courts responsibility to provide honest services
3. For the record this court is fully aware that intervener has 14 days to file for motion for
reek consideration by the panel BRA PANEL RULES 5004 (A) 5007 (A) ,5008 (b), 28 USC § 158 (b) refuting
the allegations of this totally biased and prejudiced Judge who himself was named in a complaint by the
debtor along with 43 of his other associate judges for violating their oath of office, the rules of the court,
the United States Constitution and their employment contract as defined under.Ba nkruptcy Rule 9033
The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract cf [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety
Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] in which clerks, officials, or officers of the government
pledge to perform (Support and uphold the United States and state Constitutions) in return for substance
(wages, perks, benefits). Proponents are subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of Contract,
Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections 241, 242]. Treason under the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and
Intrinsic Fraud cf [Auerbach v Samuels, 10 Utah 2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114. Emphasis supplied

INTERVENER George Mc Dermott’s AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH

4. Intervener is a person of knowledge having appeared as a friend of the court and a
reporter and videotaped over 120 Visits Ct. proceedings and attempts by the debtor to resolve this
matter in a proper legal sense puts forth this affidavit of truth to refute the following
misstatements and allegations set forth by purported judge Brian Kennedy under BR, 9033 starting
with the very first misstatements of fact in the purported finding of facts which the court can take
judicial notice of under FRE R. 201 (a) (b) (d) (e) (f).

4.1a.Par.1. Judges Assertion Flawed. (“The debtor, MS. Grenadier, filed a voluntary petition
under Chapter 13 with this court on October 4, 2017 docket No.1”).
4.1b. Intervener Was Present at this filing and had to advance the debtor the money to make
her down payment the clerk of the court on the previous day and on the date of filing stated that
she should be able to reopen the case as it was never close without any repercussions. Debtor
filed for protection based on newly discovered evidence of a fraud on the court by alleged
creditors and the previous misconduct of this judge subordinating perjury in open court which the
intervener witnessed in sham closed proceeding after hours.

4.2a. Par.2. Judges Assertion Flawed (“this is the 10th bankruptcy case. The other cases are; 98
– 10042; 99 – 81080; 00 – 11592; 07 – 11602; 08 – 11841; 09 – 11348; 12 – 12665, 13 – 10791; 16
– 13 028.
4.2b. Intervener Was Present an has seen evidence put into the courts showing debtor has
supplied the court records evidencing a conspiracy by court officers and named judges dating back
to 1999 were not one court and the US or any of the courts recognized above have failed to
prevent fraud on the court and treason against the Constitution as defined under title 18 USC Rule
2

4, all judges and courts have acted adverse to their oath of office to protect court insiders over the
Page
Constitution cf [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd.
655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] in which clerks, officials, or officers of the government pledge to perform (Support
and uphold the United States and state Constitutions) as judge Kennedy is now engaged in Treason under
18 USC 2381-84.

4.3a. Par.3. Judges Assertion Flawed .(“A. The debtor’s last bankruptcy case P3. In her last
bankruptcy case the court dismissed the case with prejudice for a period of 2 years because the
debtor did not have regular income, which is statutorily required in any Chapter 13 case. Case
18 §2382. Misprision of treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of
the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make
known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some
judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision treason. Debtor Reported Fraud On The Court's

number 16 – 13028. – BFK (DE. 71); 11 U. S. C.§109 (c). See Ex. A, ) Order of dismissal and barring
debtor entered November 2, 2016.
4.3. Intervener Was Present at the proceedings as a witness and has reported the misconduct
of the judge and the US trustee to the US Justice Department, to the US Inspector General’s office,
the US trustee stated at the beginning of this after hours proceeding in which other court insiders
were present trying to entrap the debtor, as the trustee openly stated to the judge the court did
not have jurisdiction and the proceedings were breach of the rules of professional conduct all
orders and judgments out of their proceeding fraudulent meant to deceive and have no force and
effect. Case was appealed to US District Court where others judge Hilton who has been required to
recuse himself from the latest proceedings in the matter of the debtor. For covering up the
misconduct of judge Kennedy and his associates. Video records are public posted in secret
justice.com showing debtor’s quest for justice in the courts ever-growing conspiracy against rights
and treason against the Constitution/rule of law.

4.4a. Par.4. Judges Assertion Flawed. (“The court gave the debtor and “out” – she could file a
motion and an affidavit showing she had sufficient regular income to fund a chapter 13 plan and
meet her ordinary living expenses. Id. At 2.”)
4.4b. Intervener Was Present in the court and the court transcript even though it has
108 read actions that have been reported to the supervisors showing the court had cut off
answers of the debtor and the judge when the debtor clearly stated Your Honor I have income but
the courts have failed to prove by honest services alleged debtor attorney Hackman as records
before this court clearly show has embezzled $60 million from the family trust and I am due
$20,000 a month from my ex-husband and attorney Hackman. Judge had a duty to report this to
the US attorney did not under title 18 USC 3057 and Justice Department guidelines. Yet judge has
the contemptuous right to file alleged criminal complaint against a citizen who has reported it but
the other 53 codefendants in the federal case along with judge Kennedy believe there above the
law/God’s. His order was a fraud and proceedings were also fraudulent.

4.5a. Par.5. Judges Assertion Flawed (“debtor was present in the court on October 13. 2016 at
which time the court imposed the two-year bar. See Ex B. Transcript of Nov. 13th 2016 hearing.”)
4.5b. Intervener Was Present was also present at the court and in the courtroom both
3

during the normal session and then again in the closed session after hours where the court had
Page

the head of the IT department stationed with others to try to entrap the debtor as a pattern and
practice of the court’s corruption once again intervener heard the trustee instruct the judge that
the proceedings were illegal and in violation of the code of professional conduct voiding all the
proceedings and the purported two-year suspension for treason against the Constitution and
conspiracy against the legal rights of the debtor intervener reported this criminal misconduct in
the US attorney in Alexandria Virginia as records will attest ton pursuant to 18 USC 3057,

4.6a. Par.6. Judges Assertion Flawed .(“during the October 13. 2016 hearing, the debtor
acknowledged that she had no regular income and therefore was not eligible for a chapter 13
petition. Id at 20, 12 (“the court well let’s go to Mr. Gorman’s… Fundamental truth that is – what
he says is that chapter 13 requires, quote,’ regular income.’ And he says that you don’t have any
regular income. Would you agree that? MS Grenadier; yes sir.”) Judges footnotes 2 are relevant.”)
4.6b. Intervener Was Present in the court and once again the court making statements
outside of the record you can clearly see this is the effect of having the transcript which has 108+
discrepancies and cutoffs of statements which would disprove the allegations of this judge and
show his willingness to facilitate not only fraud on the debtor by Ocwen loan servicing and its
attorneys. Grenadier V Auckland loan servicing LLC et al. 17 – CV – 0925 CH M – IDD and co-
conspirators the BW W Law group 14 – CV – 0827 – LMB – TCB.. These alleged creditors have filed
false documents with the court in all cases and this judge is covering up conspiracy against rights
under title 15 USC 1692(g) by allowing forged documents to influence a court of law without ever
meeting the requirements of this code and statute. Thereby furthering treason against the
Constitution and the financial welfare of the United States treasury.

4.7a. Pa. Judges Assertion Flawed. (“the debtor was advised in person of a two-year bar and
was advised of her right to appeal the order dismissing the case. Id at 33 – 35.”)
4.7b. Once again intervener was present in the court at the shame after hours proceeding
which was not properly transcribed and the court lacked jurisdiction by the open admission of the
US trustee who advised the judge that the proceeding was in violation of the rules of professional
conduct standard of professional responsibility the judge took it upon himself to proceed to
violate the constitutional rights of the debtor in favor of court insiders and alleged creditors who
have never produced they are real parties of interest. Not to mention the court has abandoned its
oath of office as stated in OUR [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation.,
459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] court officers Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract Emphasis
supplied.

Proponents are subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of Contract, Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections
241, 242]. Treason under the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and Intrinsic Fraud cf [Auerbach v Samuels, 10 Utah
2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114. Proponents are subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of Contract,
Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections 241, 242]. Treason under the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and Intrinsic
Fraud cf [Auerbach v Samuels, 10 Utah 2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114.

4.8a. Par.8. Judges Assertion Flawed. (“The debtor appealed the order dismissing to her case
with prejudice to the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, which was affirmed the
order. See Ex. C, Civil No, one; 16 CV – 001436, order “) relevance to refute footnote 2.2.
4

4.8b. Intervener Was Present in the courtroom. Where trial judge and US trustee
Page

Gorman even after warning of lack of jurisdiction by the trustee continued their 10 year plus
conspiracy against rights against the debtor yes the case was taken on appeal where Judge Hilton
denied every motion to appear in court with boilerplate fictitious orders denying hearing after
hearing in open court. Intervener even while motion to intervene in the court to prevent a
miscarriage of justice yet the alleged creditors never showed up they knew they had Judge Chilton
in their pocket in the case would be dismissed to cover up the misconduct of Judge Kennedy both
of whom engaged in fraud on the court and treason against the Constitution as stated in
intervener’s appellant brief which was allegedly dismissed with a purported per curiam decision
which is actually a per in curium decision forbidden under our Constitution and UCC code as well
as international law which necessitated the debtor filing a for breach of contract is conspiracy to to
deny access to the courts against Judge Hilton who has had to recuse himself from that case Judge
Kennedy and 41 other judges state and federal 4 denial of access to the courts in a RICO
conspiracy which intervener, has once again intervened in to prevent a miscarriage of justice and
treason against our Constitution by these purported judicial officers. The creditors attorneys and
others named and to be named in United States District Court for the Eastern District Alexandria
Virginia case number. Case # 1:17-CV- 01106 to preserve the record court is asked to take judicial
notice of this case a judge Kennedy was aware of it before making his last fictitious order trying to
charge the debtor with a criminal act instead of the trustee himself and the alleged creditors and
their attorneys openly committing Treason against our Constitution.

Once Again Emphasis Supplied. INTERNATIONAL VIEW The Court of Appeal in Morelle Ltd v
Wakeling [1955] 2 QB 379 stated that as a general rule the only cases in which decisions should be held to
have been given per incuriam are those of decisions given in ignorance or forgetfulness of some
inconsistent statutory provision or of some authority binding on the court concerned: so that in such cases
some part of the decision or some step in the reasoning on which it is based is found, on that account, to be
demonstrably wrong. 18 USC 3057, 2380 through 86

4.9a. Par.9. Judges Assertion Flawed. (“The debtor has appealed to the District Court with the
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals case number 17 – 1540.”)
4.9b. Intervener agrees that the case was filed from Judge Hilton’s court in the Fourth
Circuit Court of Appeals as was intervener’s case. Once again Patricia Connor’s office in the Fourth
Circuit Court of Appeals and its minions/deputy clerks joined in on this conspiracy against the
debtor’s rights as they have against the rights of the intervener from 1996 to present issuing more
of the same fraudulent void orders per curiam. Which are actually described under international
law as per incuriam forgeries in the name of the court. Once again Judge Hilton and Judge Kennedy have
abandoned their oath of office and engaged in subversive acts meant to undermine the financial and legal
integrity of our nation’s judicial system under color of law with the other 41 named officers of the court all
members of the joint subversive group recognized as the American Bar Association all of whom violate their
oath of office on a daily basis to undermine the integrity of our nation’s court system see case # one; 17 –
CV – 01106 judge Kennedy as well as all named defendants know full well that INTERNATIONAL VIEW
see The Court of Appeal in Morelle Ltd v Wakeling [1955] 2 QB 379 stated that as a general rule the only
cases in which decisions should be held to have been given per incuriam are those of decisions given in
ignorance or forgetfulness of some inconsistent statutory provision or of some authority binding on the
court concerned: so that in such cases some part of the decision or some step in the reasoning on which it
is based is found, on that account, to be demonstrably wrong. 18 USC 3057, 2380 through 86
5
Page
4.10a. Par.10 Judges Assertion Flawed. (“B. That’s an The debtor filed this bankruptcy case. On
October 4 2017, within the two-year “with prejudice”. The debtor filed a voluntary petition under
Chapter 13. See Ex. D”)
4.10b. Intervener Was Present in the clerk’s office and before the filing and afterwards
where a video record was made as a video affidavit of the filing which is posted @
secretjustice.com program number 1046 and 47 video affidavit of the days events which
intervener was present when clerk of the court reassured the debtor that the case was still open
new be no problem filing a motion based on newly discovered evidence. Debtor did not violate the
court rules as judge states, judge Kennedy violated the court rules by knowingly proceeding in
violation of the rules of professional conduct and professional responsibility which were brought
to his attention by trustee Gorman in the courts October 13 th 2016 hearing where the transcript
looks like Swiss cheese heavily edited by court insiders. Court judgments procured by fraud have
no force and effect as the US Supreme Court has repeatedly stated emphasis supplied.

4.11a. Par.11 Judges Assertion Flawed judge states (“the debtor did not comply with paragraph
two(2) of the order of dismissal from previous case, which required her to submit motion and
affidavit to the court in advance of her voluntary petition.”)
4.11b. Intervener Was Present active proceedings where the judge engaged in and
further the criminal misconduct of the alleged creditors and the trustee who had all conspired to
commit fraud on the court however trustee Gorman tried to let the court know that his
proceedings were not supported by the rules of the court and if he the court were to proceed
with judge Kennedy would be in violation of the rules of professional conduct in the canon of
laws. The case was on appeal new evidence came to light that the debtor felt must be presented
to the court of fraud on the court by the alleged creditors who were trying to steal the debtor’s
property on October 5 under color of law see proof @secretjustice.com program number 1046
and 1047 as well as 120 additional video records/affidavits of debtor’s attempt to alert the court
as to fraud malfeasance and treasonous acts of alleged creditors and their attorneys oath of office.

4.12a. Par.12 Judges Assertion Flawed judge states, (“on October 5, 2017, the court entered a
show cause order against the debtor”)
4.12b. Intervener on October 5, 2017 was present at the alleged creditors auction of the
property belonging to the debtor which they were going to try to auction off had the bankruptcy
petition not been filed with the permission of the court clerk bidders were fully aware of the
bankruptcy filing and still showed up indicating that the alleged creditors would’ve went through
with the auction had reporter George McDermott not been there to memorialize their criminal
misconduct in violation of the court rules. Judge exceeded his jurisdiction by allowing the sale to
go forward why the case was on appeal and the court had not received verifiable order from the
appellate courts dismissing the case. Dismissal was per in- curiam which is a fraud on the court.
Which judge Kennedy was more than willing to go along with violating his oath of office.

4.13a. Pa.13 Judges /accusers Assertion are Flawed (“The court heard the show cause order on
October 19, 2017 the debtor was present in person. See Ex. F. Transcript of October. 2017
hearing.”)
4.13b. Intervener Was NOT Present however based on the review of the last transcript
6

the debtor received with over 108 deletions I can only assume the court continued this pattern
Page

of obstructionist cover-up by judge Kennedy and the other 43 federal and state court
insiders debtor has named in the complaint filed US District Court Alexandria Virginia case
#1; 17 – CV – 1106, in which intervener is also intervened in too prevent further
miscarriage of justice by the named defendants in that case what all emanates from judge
Kennedy and other agents’s/insiders knowing spoliation of evidence. Recognized under
Federal evidentiary rules, rather than state spoliation laws, may be applied. King v. Ill.
Cent. R.R., 337 F.3d 550 (5th Cir. 2003). Neither of the 2 transcripts are reliable.

4.14a. Par.14 Judges /accusers Assertion are Flawed (“the debtor again acknowledged that she
does not have regular income.id at 9 (“Mr. Gorman; do you have employment at present. Or has
your income situation changed since the last case? MS Grenadier; No. it has not.”)

4.14b. Intervener Was NOT Present, However to other attorneys from outside were
present at the proceeding according to the debtor who will be subpoenaed for the criminal trial
judge Kennedy is seeking. Once again intervener believes that the transcript of the proceeding will
be heavily redacted yet another example of the courts insiders spoliation of submitted evidence.
Judge Hilton appears to have sealed all evidence put forth by the intervener depriving the
debtor of her day in court and having the truth be told. Yet no sanctions for wrongdoers.

Sanctions: Maryland courts have condoned discovery sanctions as remedies for spoliation of
evidence. See Klupt v. Krongard, 728 A.2d 727, 738 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1999). The ultimate
sanction of dismissal or default when spoliation may be imposed when the spoliation involves: (1) a
deliberate act of destruction; (2) discoverability of the evidence; (3) an intent to destroy the
evidence; (4) occurrence of the act at a time after suit has been filed, or, if before, at a time when
filing is fairly perceived as imminent. White v. Office of the Public Defender, 170 F.R.D. 138, 147
(D. Md. 1997). Emphasis supplied

4.15a. Par.15 Judges Assertion Flawed (“the debtor also did not file a certificate of completion
of credit counseling in violation of section 109 (h) of the code, despite having filed multiple
bankruptcy cases since the credit counseling requirement was imposed by Congress in late
2005.”)

4.15b. Intervener Was Present (“at the court when she filed latest case on October 4 and
intervener actually lent the debtor funds to file the documents as a friend of the court at which
time she said she had completed the credit counseling and filed papers with the court to that
effect a video was also posted in secret justice.com confirming this did an insider of the court
to give a false impression that debtor was in noncompliance once again it was the clerk’s office
that informed the debtor the case was still open and she had every right to file the petition this
was done in front of the intervener/friend of the court debtor Grenadier received on October 13
statement from the court she had 45 days to complete counseling. George McDermott friend of
the court on this 13th day of November will be lending the debtor the $25 necessary to pay for the
course is to be in full compliance with the court’s rules . See video record
posted@secretjustice.com programs 1046 & 1047. Debtor’s history with the court is posted in
other videos that secret justice.com here are the program numbers. Newest to oldest 1072, 1071,
1070, 1066, 1060, 1053, 1048, 1046, 1042, 1041, 1038, 1035, 1034, 1030, 1017, 1014, 1012, 1011,
7

1008, 1006, 1005, 1003, 1001, 1000, 999, 995, 994, 993, 990, 985, 983, 950, 947, 887, 886, 885,
Page

884, 883, 881, 880, 879, 852, 848, 825, grand jury New York, 821i, 821F, 821b, 814, 803b, 778,
743b Virginia task force. 742, 738, 736, 708, debtor released from false imprisonment. 706, 705,
703, jail visit. 701, judge denying oath of office. 700, 699, 689, 688, 686, 685, 683, 682, 681, 679,
678, 677, 676, 675, 674, 673, 672, 671, 670, 669, 667, 666, 664, 661, 660, 659, 657, 656, 655, 654,
653, 652, 651, 649, 648, 646, 645, 644, 643, 641, 637, 636, 635, 633, 632, 632C, 632B, 632AA,
628B, 627B, 627, 613, 591, 579, 556, 538-2, 538 531, 520, 518, 413, 407, emphasis supplied

U.S. at 220, 1 S.Ct. at 261 (1882)”

“Further it is the obligation of every Judge to honor, abide by, and uphold not only the Constitution and laws
of the State, but they are bound by the laws and Constitution of the United States as well.”
“State courts, like federal appellate courts, have a constitutional obligation to safeguard personal liberties and
to uphold federal law.” Stone v Powell, 428 US 465, 483 n 35, 96 S. Ct 3037, 49 L Ed. 2d 1067 (1976)”

4.16a. Par.16 Judges Assertion Flawed order states (“at the conclusion of the October 19
hearing court took the show cause order under advisement”)

4.16b. INTERVENER I WAS MADE AWARE THAT and the record reflects on the court’s
docket that disenfranchised debtor filed a motion for recusal of Judge based on his past
misconduct of office and his failure to follow the procedures set forth in the United States
bankruptcy code for the protection of victims of the court and court through deliberate spoliation
of submitted evidence, intervener asserts that judge Kennedy’s order of November 6, 2017 is in
retaliation and retribution for the debtor naming this judge as a defendant in a federal lawsuit
against himself and 42 other associate officers of the court both state and federal intervener once
again filed the complaint in federal court to intervene to prevent a miscarriage of justice against
this debtor and hand-delivered a copy of the papers to the office of trustee Gorman and judge
Kennedy’s along with 41 other named parties to that suit US District Court for the Eastern District
of Virginia case #1; 17 – CV – 01106 in which all judges of the court have been asked to recuse
themselves as named defendants and according to the debtor Judge Hilton has already been
ordered to step aside as judge Kennedy should also do. For violating the trust of there employers.
as stated in OUR [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459
S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] court officers Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract
Emphasis supplied.

4.17a. Par.17 Judges Assertion Flawed (Judge Kennedy’s purported conclusions of law outlined on
page 3 through 7 of his purported order shows that the judge has a knowledge of his duty and
responsibilities of the lack of interest in addressing frauds on his court, undermining the dignity of
the judicial system, and the courts rules of professional conduct and professional responsibility
when it comes to addressing the criminal misconduct of his associates and fellow board members
and their acts of treason against our Constitution and rule of law. The fact that this judge took on
November 6, 2017 extreme retaliatory measures against debtor after judge Kennedy himself being
formally named in a Ricoh criminal conspiracy against debtor and numerous other victims
8

intervener must file yet another report to the offices of the U.S. House and Senate Judiciary
Page

Committee seeking committee hearings and possible impeachment proceedings against those
 named officers and agents who are rubberstamping financial crimes/foreclosure frauds and white-
collar frauds to cover-up criminal misconduct by fellow ABA members that is currently costing this
Nation In Excess Of $2 Trillion In Illegal Asset Forfeitures Of Assets From The Poor And Moderate
income segments of our society to the top 15% and their corporate clients who are bringing fraud
and Deceit Meant To Undermine Our Judicial machinery and financially undermine the integrity of
our nations court system not to mention the financial survivability nations economy. Judge Kenny
knows the Law But Prefers To Further And Commit Treason Over His Faithfulness To Our
Constitution And Rule Of Law Which Must Not Be Allowed To Prevail.

4.17b. Intervener counters the judges false assertions by introducing under the federal
rules of evidence the video affidavits made at the time debtor was disenfranchised of her rights
and liberties and even falsely imprisoned by judge Kennedy’s cohorts and their fellow court
insiders/BAR members who are committing treason against our Constitution emphasis supplied;

INTERVENER’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THIS AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH

Title 18, U.S.C §2382. Misprision of treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any
treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the
same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge
or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than seven years, or both. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–
322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

Title 18, U.S.C §2383. Rebellion or insurrection

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or
insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or
gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more
than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the
United States.(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

Title 18, U.S.C §2384. Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the
United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the
United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force
to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize,
take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall
each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, §1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, §330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
9

Title 18, U.S.C §2385. Advocating overthrow of Government

Page
 Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity,
desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the
government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any
political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such
government; or
Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints,
publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed
matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of
overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts
to do so; or
Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons
who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force
or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly
of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be
ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five
years next following his conviction.
If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be
fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for
employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next
following his conviction.
As used in this section, the terms "organizes" and "organize", with respect to any society, group,
or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the
regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or
assembly of persons.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, §2, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 87–486, June
19, 1962, 76 Stat. 103; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

Title 18, U.S.C §2386. Registration of certain organizations

(A) For the purposes of this section:"Attorney General" means the Attorney General of the
United States;
"Organization" means any group, club, league, society, committee, association, political party,
or combination of individuals, whether incorporated or otherwise, but such term shall not include
any corporation, association, community chest, fund, or foundation, organized and operated
exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, literary, or educational purposes;
"Political activity" means any activity the purpose or aim of which, or one of the purposes or
aims of which, is the control by force or overthrow of the Government of the United States or a
political subdivision thereof, or any State or political subdivision thereof;

Bankruptcy Rule 9033. Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law PART IX—GENERAL PROVISIONS
States (a) SERVICE. In a proceeding in which the bankruptcy court has issued proposed findings of fact and
conclusions of law, the clerk shall serve forthwith copies on all parties by mail and note the date of mailing
on the docket. (b) OBJECTIONS: TIME FOR FILING. Within 14 days after being served with a copy of the
10

proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law a party may serve and file with the clerk written
objections which identify the specific proposed findings or conclusions objected to and state the grounds
Page

for such objection. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after being served
with a copy thereof. A party objecting to the bankruptcy judge's proposed findings or conclusions shall
arrange promptly for the transcription of the record, or such portions of it as all parties may agree upon or
the bankruptcy judge deems sufficient, unless the district judge otherwise directs. Emphasis supplied
5. Intervener states for the reasons outlined in paragraphs 1 through 17 (a) that they be
reincorporated under FRCP rule 10 (c) the conclusions of law and the facts stated in Judge
Kennedy’s purported unsigned order of November 6, 2017 are inconsistent with the Constitution
and there should be stricken. Secondly judge had a duty and responsibility under the code to
recuse himself for his personal prejudice and bias against the debtor/defendant and all pro se
litigants appearing before the court. Judges active students are inconsistent with the rule of law
passed by the United States Congress contained within our written Constitution this judge is fully
aware that he and his office are bound by the chains of the Constitution to perform their duties
and functions according to their oath of office and the laws passed Inc. by the Congress of the
United States. Any deviation from that is treason against the Constitution as stated in
memorandum of law furnished.
6. This affidavit was made in accordance rules of this court intervener asserts that the
judgment is in violation of 28 USC 2255 (a) (1) the judgment violates the Constitution (b) the court
lacks jurisdiction as this judge has refused to act in accordance with his oath of office (2) the court
lacked legal jurisdiction as a judge has failed to report criminal misconduct of the trustees and
other judicial officers brought to his attention under title 18 USC, 2381 through 2386 and 18 USC
3057 criminal charges are not warranted except by this court taking actions against the US trustee
and criminal elements brought fraud into this clerk under false pretenses. 18 USC R .4. Good
Kennedy is also named defendant in a federal civil rights lawsuit along with 43 of his other
associates.
RELIEF REQUESTED. THAT THIS COURT VACATE AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENTS
OF NOVEMBER 6, 2017 AND FURTHER THIS MATTER TO THE US ATTORNEY FOR
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF COURT INSIDERS MISCONDUCT AND TREASON
AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION. AS CITED ABOVE
Respectfully Submitted Notarized and attested to under penalty of perjury by
Witnessed and notarized 13 day of November
George McDermott this 11/13-2017
143 N. Huron Dr. by_________________________
forest Heights, MD 20745
301-996-9577 My Commission Expires
Email @George mcdermott2014@gmail.com
ATTACHMENTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RELIEF AND MOTION TO STRIKE
11

{Att. 1.] Cover page intervener's motion to intervene date stamped…………………………………………….……..P-12

Page

{Att. 1]. Cover page of unsigned order of the court denying relief requesting criminal charges falsely…P-14

{Att. 1]. Court notice to debtor 45 days receive credit counseling. Refuting judges assertion………………P-15
 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT ALEXANDRIA VIRGINIA
)
In The Matter Of ) THIS COURTS CASE #
Janice wolk Grenadier’s debtor ) no. 17 – 13354 BFk
Forced Involuntary Chapter 13 Bankruptcy )
) 1:16 -cv- 01461 CMH-IDD
SEEKING RELIEF FROM ALLEGED CREDITORS ) Jury Trial Requested as
FRAUDS ON THE COURT AND BY THE COURT ) Judge Kennedy Has Refused To Recuse
As A Disenfranchised Debtor/Victim ) Himself For Past Misconduct Of Office
) related cases, Case ;17 – CV –
) 00166 – TSE – MSN Intervener
George Mc Dermott As Creditor/ ) 1; 14 – CV – 1400 – TSE / TCB
Next Friend Of The Court/Creditor Permissive Intervener ) False imprisonment by court
________________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER OF THE COURT
THIS COURT HAVING READ AND CONSIDERED
INTERVENER’S MOTION TO STRIKE THE PURPORTED ORDER OF THIS COURT NOVEMBER 6, 2017 AND
SUBMITTING AN AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH REFUTING THE COURT’S ALLEGED ALLEGATIONS AS THEY ARE NOT
SUPPORTED BY THE RECORDS OF THIS COURT OR ANY COURT AND ARE REFUTED BY INTERVENER’S
VIDEO AFFIDAVITS POSTED @SECRETJUSTICE.COM WHERE OVER 120 OF DEBTOR’S VIDEOS ARE POSTED
RELIEF IS SOUGHT FROM A BRA PANEL RULES 5004 (A) 5007 (A) ,5008 (b), 28 USC § 158 (b) + 8009 – 10.

It is this__________ day of November 2017 this court hereby_______________ denies the relief
requested for the reasons stated
herein.__________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________ and this ruling constitutes a final appealable order of this court

As reviewed by the Hon. Judge Kenny and my hand and seal_____________________________

Official jurat cursive or typed

I George McDermott certify that on this 13th day of November 2017 after date stepping into the court
record I personally hand-delivered a copy of these motion to the US trustee's office and to the debtor at
12

the following addresses by _____________________

Page

JW Grenadier 15 W. Spring St. US trustee Gorman US trustee Judy Robbins

Alexandria Virginia 300 N. Washington St. 115 S. Union St., Suite 210
Suite 400 Alexandria, VA 22307 Alexandria, VA 22314
 13

[Att 1]
Page
 14

[Att 2]
Page
 15
Page

[Att 3]