Sunteți pe pagina 1din 161

Crossrail Line 1

Assessment of Settlement Impacts on the Built Heritage

Volume 2 - Tables

Prepared for

Cross London Rail Links Ltd

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES February 2005


CROSSRAIL LINE 1
Assessment of Settlement Impacts on the Built Heritage
Technical Report
Volume 2 of 3

FEBRUARY 2005

This report has been prepared by Alan Baxter & Associates


for Cross London Rail Links Limited

Cross London Rail Links Limited


LONDON
SW1H 0PT
Tel: 020 7941 7600
Fax: 020 7941 7703
www.crossrail.co.uk
Cross London Rail Links Ltd
Crossrail Line 1
Assessment of Settlement Impacts on the Built Heritage
Technical Report
Crossrail Reference 1E0317-G0E00-00001
Volume 2 of 3 – Tables
February 2005

Prepared by: Melissa Hansraj, David Lankester


Reviewed by: John Mason
Authorised by: Jim Gardiner
This version issued on 17 February 2005

Alan Baxter & Associates


75 Cowcross Street
London
EC1M 6EL
Tel: 020 7250 1555
Fax: 020 7250 3022
Email: aba@alanbaxter.co.uk
Contents

Contents
Volume 1 - Text
Executive Summary
1. Introduction
2. Crossrail in Context
3. Buildings and Ground Movement
4. Scope and Methodology
5. Mitigation and Protective Works
6. Summaries of Impacts – Central Section
Route Windows C1 to C13a
7. Summaries of Impacts – South-Eastern Section
Route Windows SE1 to SE6
8. General Summary of Settlement Impacts

Appendix 1 – References
Appendix 2 – Gazetteer pages for buildings just outside the
settlement-affected zone

Volume 2 - Tables
Tables 6.1 to 6.13 – Settlement Impacts on Individual Buildings –
Central Section ............................................................................... 2

Table 7.1 – Settlement Impacts on Individual Buildings –


South-Eastern Section ................................................................. 149

Table of Cross-References .................................................................. 152

Volume 3 – Maps
Maps – Route Windows C1 to C13a – Central Section
Maps – Route Windows SE1 to SE6 – South-Eastern Section

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES Crossrail Assessment of Settlement Impacts on the Built Heritage 1
• Fe b r u a r y 2 0 0 5 •
February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.1 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C1 Sheet 1 of 1

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
740 Westbourne II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Bridge tunnels - the bridge spans damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
Paddington both tunnels, with the central sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
Westminster piers within the 10mm therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
settlement lines; proximity to impact is significant. the building will be
Royal Oak tunnel, portal and undertaken where appropriate
approach ramp. and the potential impact
reviewed. If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures will be adopted to
reduce the predicted impact to
not significant levels. In this
case this would involve
carrying out maintenance to
the bridge to free its bearings
to allow it to accommodate
any ground movements that
occurred.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 2


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.2 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C2 Sheet 1 of 7

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
731 Paddington Station I
Eastbourne
Terrace Brunel Train Shed
Construction of Bakerloo line Potential settlement damage PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
link sprayed concrete lined moderate; building techniques have been residual impact.
tunnel and excavation for sensitivity score 2; therefore confirmed, further
station box. overall potential impact is settlement analysis and
particularly significant. inspections of the train
shed will be undertaken
and the potential impact
reviewed. If found
necessary, the affected
columns may be
underpinned to sufficient
depth to prevent significant
movements. Permeation
grouting of the terrace
gravels may also be
provided along route of
tunnel link to reduce
ground movements. If
found necessary,
appropriate structural
strengthening may also be
provided.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 3


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.2 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C2 Sheet 2 of 7

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
MacMillan House
The proposed Bakerloo Line Potential settlement damage PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
link sprayed concrete lined from combination of techniques have been residual impact.
tunnel will run under Bakerloo Line and confirmed, further
MacMillan House basement. diaphragm wall box for settlement analysis and
Crossrail Station are very inspections of the building
severe; building sensitivity will be undertaken and the
score 1; therefore overall potential impact reviewed.
potential impact is If found necessary,
significant. localised underpinning to
the walls of the affected
areas of MacMillan House
may be provided to reduce
movements to not
significant. An assessment
of the building structure
will be made and structural
strengthening may be
provided where required.

It is also intended that the


movement associated with
the station box will be
reduced through design
and appropriate
construction methods and
techniques.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 4


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.2 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C2 Sheet 3 of 7

CR. Action Required and


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig. Residual Impact
No Mitigation
Span 4 (BAR)
Construction of a new Potential settlement damage PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
sprayed concrete lined tunnel moderate; building techniques have been residual impact.
linking Bakerloo line with sensitivity score 2; therefore confirmed, further
Crossrail runs under Span 4. overall potential impact is settlement analysis and
particularly significant. inspections of the building
will be undertaken and the
Buildings at Risk register potential impact reviewed.
indicates slow decay and If found necessary,
lack of maintenance to roof, appropriate structural
but no significant distress. strengthening may be
provided. Mechanical
jacking may be carried out
to the affected columns
and walls to maintain
levels. Permeation grouting
of the terrace gravels may
be provided along the
route of the Bakerloo line
link tunnel to reduce
ground movements.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 5


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.2 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C2 Sheet 4 of 7

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
Construction of deep Potential settlement damage Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
diaphragm wall box for slight; building sensitivity techniques have been residual impact.
Paddington Crossrail Station. score 1; therefore overall confirmed further
potential impact is settlement analysis and/or
significant. inspection of the building
will be undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 6


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.2 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C2 Sheet 5 of 7

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
734 1 Cleveland II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Terrace tunnel-building lies on the very slight; building impact.
10mm settlement lines. sensitivity score 0; therefore
overall potential impact is
not significant.

730 Great Western II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage PSig. It is intended that the cut No significant NSig.
Hotel, Praed Street tunnels- the southern area of severe to very severe; and cover tunnel will be residual impact
the hotel lies between the building sensitivity score 0; designed and appropriate
10mm settlement line and the close proximity to box; construction techniques
north tunnel. therefore overall potential employed to prevent
impact is particularly significant movement of
New cut and cover tunnel is to significant. the hotel.
be constructed to provide a link
between the Crossrail Station It is also intended that the
box and Paddington LUL Circle contiguous piled box under
line platforms. the station concourse will
be designed and
Proximity to station works to constructed to reduce
construct new diaphragm movements to not
walled box for Crossrail station. significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 7


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.2 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C2 Sheet 6 of 7

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
727 5-9 Craven Road II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
(odd) tunnels- nos. 5 and 7 lie within slight*; building sensitivity techniques have been residual impact.
the 10mm settlement line. score 2; therefore overall confirmed further
potential impact is settlement analysis and/or
significant. inspection of the building
will be undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

796 Paddington II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Underground tunnels-the tunnels lie to the very slight; building impact.
Station, Praed south of the underground sensitivity score 1; therefore
Street, W2. station. overall potential impact is
not significant.

726 1-18 (consec.) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Spring Street tunnels- nos. 1-18 lie between very slight; building impact.
the 10mm settlement line and sensitivity score 1; therefore
the south tunnel. overall potential impact is
not significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 8


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.2 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C2 Sheet 7 of 7

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
723 194-204 (even) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Sussex Gardens tunnels- no.194 and 196 lie very slight; building impact.
on or within the 10mm sensitivity score 1; therefore
settlement lines. overall potential impact is
not significant.

722 184-192 (even) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Sussex Gardens tunnels- nos. 184 to 190 lie very slight; building impact.
within the 10mm lines. sensitivity score 0; therefore
overall potential impact is
not significant.

714 163-213 (odd) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Sussex Gardens tunnels- nos. 193 to 209 lie very slight; building impact.
within the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 0; therefore
lines. overall potential impact is
not significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 9


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.3 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C3 Sheet 1 of 1

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
710 25–31 (consec.) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Hyde Park Gardens tunnels. These buildings lie damage negligible; impact.
& within or on the 10mm building sensitivity score
22–35 (consec.) settlement lines. 1;therefore overall
Stanhope Terrace potential impact is not
significant.

701 1-24 (consec.) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Hyde Park Gardens tunnels. These buildings lie damage negligible; impact.
within or on the 10mm building sensitivity score
settlement lines. 1;therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

6103 129 Park Lane/ 24 II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Dunraven Street tunnels- the building lies damage negligible; impact.
within the 10 mm settlement building sensitivity score
lines. 1;therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

699 32 Green Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no.32 Green Street damage negligible; impact.
partially lies on the 10mm building sensitivity score
settlement line. 2; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 10


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 1 of 28

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
689 10 Green Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- front of the building damage negligible; impact.
lies within the 10mm building sensitivity score
settlement lines. 2;therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

687 23 Lees Place II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no.23 lies directly damage negligible; impact.
above the south tunnel. building sensitivity score
1;therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 11


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 2 of 28

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
686 61 Green Street II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
tunnels- no.61 lies between damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
the tunnels, and partially sensitivity score 2; confirmed further settlement
within the therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
10mm settlement lines. impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

679 29 North Audley II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant Nsig.
Street tunnels- no. 29 lies within the damage negligible; impact.
10mm settlement lines. building sensitivity score
1;therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 12


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 3 of 28

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
677 11- 12 North II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Audley Street tunnels- nos.11 and 12 lie damage negligible; techniques have been residual impact.
between the tunnels and building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
partially within the 3; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
10mm settlement lines. potential impact is the building will be
significant undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

676a 14 North Audley II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street tunnels- no. 14 lies on the damage negligible; impact.
10mm settlement line. building sensitivity score
1;therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 13


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 4 of 28

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
676 St. Mark’s, I Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
North Audley BAR tunnels- the building lies damage negligible; techniques have been residual impact.
Street within the 10mm settlement building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
lines. 3; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
Buildings at Risk register impact reviewed. If found
indicates slow decay and necessary, appropriate
lack of maintenance, but protective measures (as
no significant distress. described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 14


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 5 of 28

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


No Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig. Mitigation Description Sig.
675 Electricity Sub- II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
station, tunnels- the sub-station lies damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
Brown Hart between the tunnels, and sensitivity score 1; confirmed further
Gardens partially within the 10mm therefore overall potential settlement analysis and/or
settlement lines. impact is significant. inspection of the building
will be undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 15


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 6 of 28

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
669 73 Duke Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
tunnels- no.73 lies within the damage very slight; techniques have been residual impact.
10mm settlement lines. building sensitivity score confirmed further
2; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
potential impact is inspection of the building
significant. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.
667 Ukrainian II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Catholic tunnels - the building lies damage very slight; techniques have been residual impact.
Cathedral- within the 10mm settlement building sensitivity score confirmed further
Duke Street / 21 lines. 3; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
Binney Street potential impact is inspection of the building
significant. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 16


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 7 of 28

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
666 75-83 (odd) Duke II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Street tunnels- nos.79- 83 Duke damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
Street lie within the 10mm sensitivity score 1; confirmed further
settlement lines. therefore overall potential settlement analysis and/or
impact is significant. inspection of the building
will be undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

664 1, 1a & 2 Duke’s II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Yard tunnels- the houses lie within damage negligible; impact.
including 85 & the 10mm settlement lines. building sensitivity score
85a Duke Street 1;therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 17


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 8 of 28

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
661 27 Gilbert Street II Proximity to station works. Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Bored twin segmental lined damage very slight*; techniques have been residual impact.
South tunnels - no.27 lies building sensitivity score confirmed further
directly above South tunnel. 1; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
potential impact is inspection of the building
significant. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

657 356-366 (even) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Oxford Street tunnels –the east side of this damage very slight; impact.
block lies within the 10mm building sensitivity score
settlement lines. The block is 1; therefore overall
in proximity to sprayed potential settlement impact
concrete lined access passage is not significant.
link between Crossrail
platform and existing jubilee
and central line tube station.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 18


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 9 of 28

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
6172 68 Brook Street II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels – the rear of damage very slight; techniques have been residual impact.
the building lies on the 10mm building sensitivity score confirmed further
settlement line. 2; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
potential impact is inspection of the building
Proximity to new Western significant. will be undertaken where
Ticket Hall concrete box appropriate and the
structure. potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

653 66 Brook Street I Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
& 51- 53 (odd) platform tunnels – these damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
Davies Street buildings lie within or on the building sensitivity score confirmed, further
10mm lines. 3; therefore overall settlement analysis and
potential impact is inspections of the building
particularly significant. will be undertaken and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
compensation grouting may
be undertaken from a shaft
in Davies Mews to reduce
the predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 19


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 10 of 28

CR. Action Required and


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig. Residual Impact
No Mitigation
645 58 Davies Street II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
(Grays Antique platform tunnels and cross- damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
Market) passage tunnel - no.58 lies building sensitivity score confirmed, further
directly above the north 1; close proximity to open settlement analysis and
tunnel. excavation; therefore inspections of the building
overall potential impact is will be undertaken and the
Proximity to new Western particularly significant. potential impact reviewed.
Ticket Hall concrete box If found necessary,
structure. compensation grouting may
be undertaken from within
Building is above new the proposed western ticket
spheroidal graphite iron lined hall box excavation to
escalator tunnel. reduce the predicted impact
to not significant levels.

Temporary sewer pipe laid on Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant
the east side of Davies Street, damage to pavement techniques have been residual impact. NSig.
adjacent to assumed vaults; assumed slight; confirmed further
pavement vaults. building sensitivity score settlement analysis and/or
1: therefore potential inspection of the building
impact is significant. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 20


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 11 of 28

CR Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No. Mitigation Description Sig.
637 50, 52 and 54 II Sprayed concrete lined No. 50 Davies Street NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Davies Street. platform tunnel- these potential settlement impact.
buildings lie within the 10mm damage slight; building
settlement lines. sensitivity score
0;therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.
Proximity to new Western
Ticket Hall concrete box
structure, concrete lined
circulation passage tunnels,
sprayed lined cross passages
and new spheroidal graphite
iron lined escalator tunnels.

52-54 Davies Street Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.


potential settlement techniques have been residual impact.
damage slight; building confirmed further
sensitivity score 1; settlement analysis and/or
therefore overall potential inspection of the building
impact is significant. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 21


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 12 of 28

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
636 1–7 (consec.) II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Davies Mews platform tunnels - nos. 1-7 damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
& 28–30 (consec.) and 28-30 lie directly above building sensitivity score confirmed further
South Molton the south tunnel. 1; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
Lane potential impact is inspection of the building
Close proximity to new significant. will be undertaken where
Western Ticket Hall appropriate and the
diaphragm wall concrete box potential impact reviewed.
structure, concrete lined If found necessary,
circulation passage tunnels, appropriate protective
sprayed concrete lined cross measures (as described in
passage tunnels and new Chapter 5) will be adopted
spheroidal graphite iron lined to reduce the predicted
escalator tunnels. impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 22


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 13 of 28

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
635 40-46 (even) II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Brook Street platform tunnel- rear of nos. damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
40-46 lie within the 10mm building sensitivity score confirmed further
settlement lines. 1; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
potential impact is inspection of the building
significant. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

648 41 South Molton II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street platform tunnels – no. 41 lies damage very slight; impact.
on the 10mm settlement line. building sensitivity score
1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 23


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 14 of 28

CR. Action Required and


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig. Residual Impact
No Mitigation
647 26 South Molton II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Street platform tunnels - no.26 lies damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
within the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 1; confirmed further
lines. therefore overall potential settlement analysis and/or
impact is significant. inspection of the building
Close proximity to sprayed will be undertaken where
concrete lined access passage appropriate and the
link tunnel between Crossrail potential impact reviewed.
platform and existing jubilee If found necessary,
and central line tube station. appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

646 24, 25 South II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Molton Street platform tunnels - no. 24 & 25 damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
lie within the 10mm sensitivity score 1; confirmed further
settlement lines. therefore overall potential settlement analysis and/or
impact is significant. inspection of the building
Close proximity to sprayed will be undertaken where
concrete lined access passage appropriate and the
link tunnel between Crossrail potential impact reviewed.
platform and existing jubilee If found necessary,
and central line tube station. appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 24


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 15 of 28

CR Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No. Mitigation Description Sig.
644 21 South Molton II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Street platform tunnels - no.21 lies damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
within the 10mm settlement building sensitivity score confirmed further
lines. 1; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
potential impact is inspection of the building
Close proximity to new significant. will be undertaken where
spheroidal graphite iron lined appropriate and the
escalator tunnel. potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 25


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 16 of 28

CR Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No. Mitigation Description Sig.
643 19 & 20 South II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Molton St. tunnels - nos. 19 and 20 lie damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
within the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 1; confirmed further
lines. therefore overall potential settlement analysis and/or
impact is significant. inspection of the building
Close proximity to sprayed will be undertaken where
concrete lined cross passage appropriate and the
tunnel and new spheroidal potential impact reviewed.
graphite iron lined escalator If found necessary,
tunnel. appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

642 50 South Molton II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Street platform tunnels - no.50 lies damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
between the north tunnel & building sensitivity score confirmed further
the 10mm settlement lines. 2; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
potential impact is inspection of the building
significant. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 26


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 17 of 28

CR Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No. Mitigation Description Sig.
641 18 South Molton II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Street platform tunnels - no.18 lies damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
directly above the north sensitivity score 1; confirmed further
tunnel. therefore overall potential settlement analysis and/or
impact is significant. inspection of the building
Proximity to sprayed concrete will be undertaken where
lined cross passage tunnel appropriate and the
and new spheroidal graphite potential impact reviewed.
iron lined escalator tunnel. If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.
640 17 South Molton II* Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Street platform tunnels - no.l7 lies damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
directly above tunnel. sensitivity score 1; confirmed further
therefore overall potential settlement analysis and/or
Proximity to sprayed concrete impact is significant. inspection of the building
lined cross passage tunnel will be undertaken where
and new spheroidal graphite appropriate and the
iron lined escalator tunnel. potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 27


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 18 of 28

CR Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No. Mitigation Description Sig.
639 14–16 (consec.) II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
South Molton St. platform tunnels - nos. 14-16 damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
all lie within the 10mm building sensitivity score confirmed further
settlement lines. 1; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
potential impact is inspection of the building
Proximity to sprayed concrete significant. will be undertaken where
lined cross passage tunnel appropriate and the
and new spheroidal graphite potential impact reviewed.
iron lined escalator tunnel. If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.
638 10–12 (consec.) II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
South Molton St. platform tunnels –nos. 10-12 damage severe to very techniques have been residual impact.
lie within the 10mm severe; building sensitivity confirmed, further
settlement contours. score 1; therefore overall settlement analysis and
potential impact is inspections of the building
Close proximity to sprayed particularly significant. will be undertaken and the
concrete lined cross passage potential impact reviewed.
tunnel and new spheroid If found necessary,
graphite iron lined escalator compensation grouting may
tunnel. be undertaken from a shaft
in Haunch of Venison Yard
and/or one in Davies Mews
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 28


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 19 of 28

CR Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No. Mitigation Description Sig.
634 63 South Molton II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Street platform tunnels and cross- damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
passage- sensitivity score 2; confirmed further
no. 63 lies directly above the therefore overall potential settlement analysis and/or
cross-passage and south impact is significant. inspection of the building
passage. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.
625 20 Brook St II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels – no.20 lies damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
within the 10mm settlement building sensitivity score confirmed further
lines. 2; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
potential impact is inspection of the building
significant. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 29


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 20 of 28

CR Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No. Mitigation Description Sig.
624 103 New Bond II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Street platform and cross-passage damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
tunnels - no.103 lies within building sensitivity score confirmed further
the 10mm settlement lines. 1; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
potential impact is inspection of the building
Close proximity to new particularly significant. will be undertaken where
spheroidal graphite iron lined appropriate and the
escalator tunnel. potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.
623 74 New Bond II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Street platform tunnels - no.74 lies damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
between the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 1; confirmed further
lines. therefore overall potential settlement analysis and/or
impact is significant. inspection of the building
Close proximity to sprayed will be undertaken where
concrete lined cross passage appropriate and the
tunnel and new spheroidal potential impact reviewed.
graphite iron lined escalator If found necessary,
tunnel. appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 30


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 21 of 28

CR Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No. Mitigation Description Sig.
619 / 20 Hanover II* Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
618 Square platform tunnels and access damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
passage- no.20 lies directly building sensitivity score confirmed, further
above the south tunnel and 2; close proximity to shaft; settlement analysis and
access passage. therefore overall potential inspections of the building
impact is particularly will be undertaken and the
Close proximity to temporary significant. potential impact reviewed.
construction shaft. If found necessary,
compensation grouting
Directly next to new deep may be undertaken from
diaphragm wall box for Bond shafts in Dering Yard and
Street Eastern Ticket Hall. within the proposed
Eastern Ticket Hall
shallow excavation to
reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 31


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 22 of 28

CR Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No. Mitigation Description Sig.
617 21 Hanover II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Square platform and cross passage damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
tunnels- no.21 lies directly building sensitivity score confirmed further
above south tunnel. 2; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
potential impact is inspection of the building
Close proximity to new deep significant. will be undertaken where
diaphragm wall box for Bond appropriate and the
Street Station Eastern Ticket potential impact reviewed.
Hall. If found necessary,
appropriate protective
Close proximity to temporary measures (as described in
construction shaft. Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.
616 16 Hanover II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Square platform tunnels - no. 16 lies damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
within the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 2; confirmed further
lines. therefore overall potential settlement analysis and/or
impact is significant. inspection of the building
will be undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 32


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 23 of 28

CR Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No. Mitigation Description Sig.
615 Hanover Square: II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
South Side Statue- tunnels - the statue lies within damage very slight;
William Pitt the the 10mm settlement lines. building sensitivity score
Younger. 0;therefore overall
Proximity to sprayed concrete potential impact is not
lined westbound launch significant.
chamber.

614 Hanover Square: II Bored twin segmental lined No significant impact. NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
North Side. tunnels - the cab shelter lies
Cab Shelter on the 10mm settlement line.

611 24 Hanover II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Square, W1 platform tunnels - no.24 lies damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
on the 10mm settlement line. sensitivity score confirmed further
1;therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
potential impact is inspection of the building
significant. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 33


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 24 of 28

CR Action Required and


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig. Residual Impact
No. Mitigation
6111a 7 Hanover Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
tunnels- no. 7 lies between damage negligible; building
the north and south tunnels. sensitivity score 0;therefore
overall potential impact is
not significant.

6111 15 Hanover Street, II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
W1 tunnels- no. 15 lies directly damage negligible; building
above the south tunnel. sensitivity score 2;therefore
overall potential impact is
not significant.

608 229–233 (odd) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
Regent Street (part tunnels- nos. 229 – 233 lie damage negligible; building
of 229-247 (odd) within the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 1;therefore
Regent Street lines. overall potential impact is
including not significant.
1Hanover Street
and 27 Princelet
Street)

607 235–241 (odd) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
Regent Street (part tunnels- no.235-239 lie on damage negligible; building
of 229-247 (odd) the 10mm settlement line. sensitivity score 1;therefore
Regent Street overall potential impact is
including not significant.
1Hanover Street
and 27 Princelet
Street)

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 34


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 25 of 28

CR Action Required and


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig. Residual Impact
No. Mitigation
602 223 Regent Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
/ 4 Maddox Street tunnels- these buildings lie on damage negligible; building
or within the 10mm sensitivity score 1;therefore
settlement line. overall potential impact is
not significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 35


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 26 of 28

CR Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No. Mitigation Description Sig.
601 225 & 227 Regent II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
Street tunnels- no. 225 and 227 lie damage negligible; building
within the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 1;therefore
lines. overall potential impact is
not significant.

5235 224-244 (even) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
Regent Street tunnel- the southern part of damage negligible; building
Dickens & Jones Nos.224- 244 lies within the sensitivity score 1;therefore
Dept. Store 10mm settlement lines. overall potential impact is
not significant.

5233 1-4 Argyll Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
(Ideal House) tunnels- the south of this damage negligible; building
building lies within the 10mm sensitivity score 2;therefore
settlement lines. overall potential impact is
not significant.

5234 208a, 208-222 II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
(even) Regent tunnels- north of nos.210- damage negligible; building
Street 222 lies on the 10mm sensitivity score 2;therefore
Liberty’s Dept. settlement lines. overall potential impact is
Store not significant.

5230 Great Marlborough II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
Street. South side- tunnels- north of the building damage negligible; building
corner of Kingly lies partially above the south sensitivity score 2;therefore
Street (Liberty’s tunnel. overall potential impact is
Tudor building). not significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 36


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 27 of 28

CR Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No. Mitigation Description Sig.
5231 7-8 Argyll Street- II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise No significant NSig.
The London tunnels- the south of the damage very slight; construction techniques residual impact.
Palladium Theatre. building lies within the 10mm building sensitivity score have been confirmed
settlement lines. 1-3; therefore overall further settlement analysis
potential impact is and/or inspection of the
significant. building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact
reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5)
will be adopted to reduce
the predicted impact to
not significant levels.

5229 Gt. Marlborough II Bored twin segmental lined No significant impact NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
Street- Ventilation tunnels - the bollards and
shaft & listed ventilation shaft lie between
bollards- these tunnels, some of the
triangular space at bollards lie partially above the
north end of south tunnel.
Carnaby Street.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 37


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.4 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C4 Sheet 28 of 28

CR Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No. Mitigation Description Sig.
5228 19– 21 Gt. II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed No significant impact. NSig.
Marlborough tunnels. The front of nos. 19- damage negligible;
Street 21 lie within the 10mm building sensitivity score
(Former settlement lines. 1; therefore overall
courthouse) potential impact is not
significant.
Building is undergoing
reconstruction. Impact
assessment based on old
building. In the event of
major changes in structural
form and/or foundation
details, reassessment is
recommended.

5218 48 Gt. II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
Marlborough tunnels - no. 48 lies directly damage negligible;
Street above the south tunnel. building sensitivity score
2;therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 38


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Shedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 1 of 37

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
5214 15 Poland Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
tunnels-no. 15 lies partially very slight; building
above the South Tunnel. sensitivity score 1;therefore
overall potential impact is
not significant.
5209 13 D’Arblay Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
tunnels. The rear of the negligible; building
building lies within the 10mm sensitivity score 1;therefore
settlement lines. overall potential impact is
not significant.
5207 46 Berwick Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
tunnels-no. 46 lies partially negligible; building
over North Tunnel. sensitivity score 2;therefore
overall potential impact is
not significant.
5205 67 Berwick Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
and 21A Noel tunnels-no. 67 lies in between very slight; building
Street the North and South tunnel sensitivity score 1;therefore
and within the 10mm overall potential impact is
settlement lines. not significant.
5202 48 Berwick Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
tunnels- no. 48 lies on the negligible; building
10mm settlement line. sensitivity score 2; therefore
overall potential impact is
not significant.
5201 47 Berwick Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
tunnels- no. 47 lies within the negligible; building
10mm settlement lines. sensitivity score 2; therefore
overall potential impact is
not significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 39


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 2 of 37

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
5200 5 Noel Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no. 5 lies directly damage negligible; building impact.
over the North Tunnel. sensitivity score 2; therefore
overall potential impact is
not significant.
5199 187 Wardour II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street tunnels- no. 187 lies directly damage negligible; building impact.
over the North Tunnel. sensitivity score 2; therefore
overall potential impact is
not significant.
5195 2-4 (consec.) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
D’Arblay Street tunnels- nos. 2-4 lie directly damage negligible; building impact.
over the South Tunnel. sensitivity score 1; therefore
overall potential impact is
not significant.
5189 105-109 (odd) II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Oxford Street (& platform tunnels. The damage moderate; building techniques have been residual impact.
16-18 (consec.) buildings lie within the 10mm sensitivity score 1; therefore confirmed further settlement
Hollen Street) settlement lines. overall potential impact is analysis and/or inspection of
significant. the building will be
undertaken where
Proximity to western ticket appropriate and the potential
hall, secant piled box. impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 40


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 3 of 37

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
5188 152-160 (even) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Wardour Street tunnels- nos. 152-160 lie damage severe to very techniques have been residual impact.
between and over the North severe; building sensitivity confirmed, further settlement
and south tunnels. score 1; therefore overall analysis and inspections of the
potential impact is building will be undertaken
particularly significant. and the potential impact
Proximity to the western ticket reviewed. If found necessary,
hall secant piled box and the compensation grouting may
proposed Fareham Street be undertaken from a shaft in
shaft. Sheraton Street and/or from
within proposed western ticket
hall box excavation to reduce
the potential impact to not
significant levels.

5187 Great Chapel II Sprayed concrete lined No significant impact. NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street platform tunnels-the bollards impact.
(Bollards) lie within the 10mm
settlement lines.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 41


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 4 of 37

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
5185 Great Chapel II Sprayed concrete lined No significant impact. NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street platform tunnels-the bollards impact.
(Bollards) lie just north of the south
tunnel.
5183 17 Carlisle Street II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels-no. 17 lies damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
directly over the south sensitivity score 2; confirmed further settlement
tunnel. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where appropriate
and the potential impact
Close proximity to western reviewed. If found necessary,
ticket hall and Fareham Street appropriate protective
shaft. measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted to
reduce the predicted impact to
not significant levels.
5182 6 Carlisle Street II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels-front lies damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
within 10mm settlement building sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
lines. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where appropriate
and the potential impact
reviewed. If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted to
reduce the predicted impact to
not significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 42


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 5 of 37

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
5180 5 Carlisle Street II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels-front lies damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
within 10mm settlement lines. building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
2; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.
5179 4 Carlisle Street II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels-no. 4 lies damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
within 10mm settlement lines. building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
1; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 43


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 6 of 37

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
5181 90 Dean Street II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels-no. 90 lies damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
over the south tunnel. building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
1; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.
5178 89 Dean Street II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels-no. 89 lies damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
within the 10mm settlement building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
lines. 1; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 44


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 7 of 37

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
5177 88 Dean Street II* Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels-no. 88 lies damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
on the 10mm settlement lines. building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
2; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 45


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 8 of 37

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
5173 4-6 (consec.) Soho II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Square/6 Dean platform tunnels-the building damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
Street lies between the north and building sensitivity score confirmed further
south tunnels and within the 2; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
10mm settlement lines. potential impact is inspection of the building
significant. will be undertaken where
The building lies over the appropriate and the
sprayed concrete lined cross potential impact reviewed.
passage tunnel. If found necessary,
appropriate protective
The front of the building lies measures (as described in
over the spheroidal graphite Chapter 5) will be adopted
iron segmental lined escalator to reduce the predicted
tunnel. impact to not significant
levels.
Proximity to Fareham Street
shaft.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 46


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 9 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
5172 3 Soho Square/7 II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Dean Street platform tunnels- the building damage slight*; building techniques have been residual impact.
lies between the north and sensitivity score 2; confirmed further settlement
south tunnels and within the therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
10mm settlement lines. impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
The building lies over the appropriate and the potential
intersection of the sprayed impact reviewed. If found
concrete lined cross passage necessary, appropriate
tunnel and the spheroidal protective measures (as
graphite iron segmental lined described in Chapter 5) will
escalator tunnel. be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
Proximity to Fareham Street significant levels.
shaft.

5171 2 Soho Square II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels- the building damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
lies between the north and building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
south tunnels and within the 2; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
10mm settlement lines. potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
Proximity to sprayed concrete appropriate and the potential
lined cross passage tunnel. impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
Proximity to Fareham Street protective measures (as
shaft described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 47


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 10 of 37
CR. Action required and Residual Impact
Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
5171a 8 Dean Street II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels-the building damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
lies between the north and building sensitivity score confirmed further
south tunnels and within the 2; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
10mm settlement lines. potential impact is inspection of the building
significant. will be undertaken where
The rear of the building lies appropriate and the
over the sprayed concrete potential impact reviewed.
lined cross passage tunnel. If found necessary,
appropriate protective
Proximity to Fareham Street measures (as described in
shaft. Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

5170 38/38a Soho II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Square platform tunnels- the building damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
lies between the north and building sensitivity score confirmed further
south tunnels and within the 1; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
10mm settlement lines. potential impact is inspection of the building
significant. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 48


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 11 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Address mitigation Description Sig.
5168 37 Soho Square II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels- no. 37 lies damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
over the south tunnel and sensitivity score 2; confirmed further
within the 10mm settlement therefore overall potential settlement analysis and/or
lines. impact is significant. inspection of the building
will be undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 49


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 12 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
5169 8 & 9 Soho Square II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels- nos. 8-9 lie damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
over the North tunnel and building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
within the 10mm settlement 2; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
lines. potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
The building lies over the appropriate and the potential
spheroidal graphite iron impact reviewed. If found
segmental lined escalator necessary, appropriate
tunnel. protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

5167 10 & 10A Soho II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Square platform tunnels-building lies damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
within the 10mm settlement building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
lines. 2; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 50


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 13 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
5166 19 Carlisle Street II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels and cross damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
passage tunnel- no. 19 lies building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
between the north and south, 1; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
platform tunnels and partially potential impact is the building will be
over the cross passage tunnel. significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

5165 36 Soho Square II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels- no. 36 lies damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
over the south tunnel and building sensitivity score confirmed, further settlement
within the 10mm settlement 3; therefore overall analysis and inspections of
lines. potential impact is the building will be
particularly significant. undertaken and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, compensation
grouting may be undertaken
from a shaft in the south-west
corner of Soho Square to
reduce the predicted impact
to not significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 51


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 14 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
5160 13 Soho Square II* Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels- no. 13 lies damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
within the 10mm settlement building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
lines. 2; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

5159 15 Soho Square II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels- no. 15 lies damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
within the 10mm settlement building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
lines. 2; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 52


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 15 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
5154 21 Soho Square II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels-no. 21 lies damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
within the 10mm settlement building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
lines. 1; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

5152 St. Patrick’s II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Presbytery platform tunnels-St. Patrick’s damage slight*; building techniques have been residual impact.
lies between the north and sensitivity score 2; confirmed further settlement
south tunnels and within the therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
10mm settlement lines. impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
Proximity to deep diaphragm- appropriate and the potential
walled Goslett Yard Box. impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 53


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 16 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
5145 St. Patrick’s RC II* Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Church, Soho platform tunnels- the building damage severe to very techniques have been residual impact.
Square lies between the north and severe; building sensitivity confirmed, further
south tunnels and within the score 2 to 3; therefore settlement analysis and/or
10mm settlement lines. overall potential impact is inspection of the building
particularly significant. will be undertaken where
The Church lies over the appropriate and the
sprayed concrete lined cross potential impact reviewed.
passage tunnel. If found necessary,
compensation grouting may
The church lies directly next be undertaken from a shaft
to the deep diaphragm-walled in the south-east corner of
Goslett Yard Box. Soho Square to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 54


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 17 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
5161 Soho Square II Sprayed concrete lined No significant impact. NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Statue of Charles II platform tunnels-statue is impact.
between the north and south
tunnels and within 10mm
settlement lines.

Proximity to sprayed concrete


lined cross-passage tunnel.
5198 Soho Square II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Shelter platform tunnels-shelter is damage very slight; impact.
within 10mm settlement lines. building sensitivity score
0; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.
Proximity to sprayed concrete
lined cross-passage tunnel.
5155 29 & 30 Soho II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Square platform tunnels- the front of damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
The Hospital for the building lies within the building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
Women 10mm settlement lines. 1; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 55


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 18 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
5150 26 Soho Square II* Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels and cross damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
passage tunnel- no. 26 lies building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
over the south platform tunnel 2; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
and close to the cross passage potential impact is the building will be
tunnel. significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
Proximity to Goslett Yard impact reviewed. If found
deep diaphragm wall Box. necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

5153 3 Greek Street II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels- no. 3 lies on damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
the 10mm settlement line. building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
2; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 56


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 19 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
5143 1 Greek Street I Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
& House of St. platform tunnels. The building damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
5147 Barnabas and lies within the 10mm building sensitivity score confirmed, further
chapel settlement lines. 3; therefore overall settlement analysis and
potential impact is inspections of the building
particularly significant. will be undertaken and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
compensation grouting may
be undertaken from a shaft
in the south-east corner of
Soho Square and/or one in
the yard to the rear of
Goldbeater’s House,
Manette Street to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 57


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 20 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
5142 14 Manette Street II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels- no. 14 lies damage severe to very techniques have been residual impact.
within the 10mm settlement severe; building sensitivity confirmed, further settlement
lines. score 1; therefore overall analysis and inspections of
potential impact is the building will be
Proximity to Goslett yard particularly significant. undertaken and the potential
deep diaphragm wall box and impact reviewed. If found
small vent shaft and tunnel. necessary, compensation
grouting may be undertaken
from a shaft in yard to the
rear of Goldbeater’s House,
Manette Street to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

5139 16-17 Manette II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Street platform tunnels- nos. 16-17 damage severe to very techniques have been residual impact.
lie within the 10mm severe; building sensitivity confirmed, further settlement
settlement lines. score 1; therefore overall analysis and inspections of
potential impact is the building may be
Proximity to small vent shaft particularly significant. undertaken and the potential
and tunnel. (Crossrail to impact reviewed. If found
confirm construction). necessary, compensation
grouting may be undertaken
from a shaft in yard to the
rear of Goldbeater’s House,
Manette Street to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 58


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 21 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
5138a Centre Point, 101 II* Close proximity to Charing Tower - Potential Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
& 103 New Cross Road and Astoria settlement damage very techniques have been residual impacts.
Oxford Street eastern ticket hall diaphragm slight*; building sensitivity confirmed further settlement
(including 5-24 St walled or piled boxes, eastern score 1; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
Giles High Street) entrance, new spheroidal potential impact is the building will be
graphite iron segmental lined significant. undertaken where
escalator tunnels and appropriate and the potential
connection tunnels to Central impact reviewed. If found
and Northern line platforms necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
Bored twin segmental lined be adopted to reduce the
tunnels- the west of Centre predicted impact to not
Point Tower lies on the 10mm significant levels.
settlement lines.

Centre Point House - Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.


Potential settlement techniques have been residual impacts.
damage slight*; building confirmed further settlement
sensitivity score 0; analysis and/or inspection of
therefore overall potential the building will be
impact is significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 59


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 22 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
5135 20 Denmark Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
& 16 Denmark tunnels-these buildings lie damage slight; building techniques have been residual impacts.
Place within the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
lines. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
Proximity to new spheroidal undertaken where
graphite iron segmental lined appropriate and the
Northern line escalator and potential impact reviewed.
connection tunnel. If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

5134 9 & 10 Denmark II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed No significant impact NSig
Street BAR tunnels- the building lies damage very slight;
within the 10mm settlement building sensitivity score
lines. 1;therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.
Buildings at Risk register
indicates slow decay and
lack of maintenance; roof
in poor condition, but
otherwise no significant
distress.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 60


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 23 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
5132 5 and 6-7 II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Denmark Street tunnels- no. 7 lies on the damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
10mm settlement line. sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
Proximity to new spheroidal impact is significant. the building will be
graphite iron segmental lined undertaken where appropriate
Northern line escalator and and the potential impact
connection tunnel. reviewed. If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted to
reduce the predicted impact to
not significant levels.
5131 26 Denmark Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig
BAR tunnels- lies on the 10mm damage very slight; impact
settlement line. building sensitivity score
1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Buildings at Risk register


indicates slow decay and
lack of maintenance but
no significant distress.
5130 27 Denmark Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig
tunnels- building lies partially damage negligible; impact
on the 10mm settlement line. building sensitivity score
2;therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 61


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 24 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
5128 Phoenix Theatre, II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig
Charing Cross Rd tunnels- the north-east corner damage very slight; techniques have been residual impact
of the building lies over the building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
10mm settlement line. 3; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

5128a 12 Flitcroft Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig
tunnels - building lies on the damage very slight; impact
10mm settlement line. building sensitivity score
1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 62


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 25 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
5129 59 St Giles High II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig
Street tunnels- building lies over the damage negligible; techniques have been residual impact
north tunnel. building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
3; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where appropriate
and the potential impact
reviewed. If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted to
reduce the predicted impact to
not significant levels.
5124 1-5 (consec.) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig
Flitcroft Street tunnels - south of block lies damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact
within the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 2; confirmed further settlement
lines. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where appropriate
and the potential impact
reviewed. If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted to
reduce the predicted impact to
not significant levels.
5121 St Giles in the I Bored twin segmental lined No significant impact. NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Fields, St Giles tunnels- building lies outside impact
High Street the settlement lines.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 63


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 26 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
5113 21 Monmouth II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street tunnels- building lies on the damage negligible; impact
10mm settlement line. building sensitivity score
1;therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

5105 55 Neal Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- building lies within damage negligible; impact
the 10mm and settlement building sensitivity score
lines. 2;therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

5102 64 Neal Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
tunnels – building lies on the damage very slight; techniques have been residual impact
10mm settlement line. building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
2; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 64


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 27 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
589 51-69 (odd) Endell II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Street tunnels. Nos. 51 and 53 lie on damage very slight; techniques have been residual impact
the 10mm settlement lines. building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
2; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

593 Shaftesbury II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Theatre, tunnels- the south of the damage negligible; techniques have been residual impact
Shaftesbury building lies between the building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
Avenue 10mm settlement line. 3; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 65


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 28 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
575 St Giles' II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Almshouses, 17A tunnels- the building lies on damage very slight; impact.
Macklin Street the 10mm settlement line. building sensitivity score
(also 9-10 Smarts 1;therefore overall
Place) potential impact is not
significant.
579 8a Smarts Place II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- building lies over damage negligible; impact.
south tunnel. building sensitivity score
1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.
567 23 Macklin Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- building lies on the damage slight; building impact.
10mm settlement line. sensitivity score
0;therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.
566 24 Stukeley St/25 II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Macklin Street tunnels- building lies on the damage slight; building techniques have been confirmed residual impact
10mm settlement line. sensitivity score 1; further settlement analysis
therefore overall potential and/or inspection of the building
impact is significant. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will be
adopted to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 66


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 29 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
574 Holborn Town II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Hall and Library tunnels- building lies over the damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact
North tunnel and within the sensitivity score 3; confirmed further settlement
10mm settlement lines. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is particularly the building will be
significant. undertaken and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.
570 199-201 (consec) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
High Holborn tunnels- building lies over the damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact
north tunnel and within the sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
10mm settlement lines. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 67


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 30 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
563 207 High Holborn II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
tunnels- building lies on the damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact
10mm settlement line. sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

560 Princess Louise II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Pub, 208-209 tunnels- building lies over the damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact
High Holborn south tunnel. sensitivity score 2; confirmed further settlement
therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 68


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 31 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
554 212 High Holborn II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
tunnels - the building lies on damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact
the 10mm settlement line. sensitivity score 2; confirmed further settlement
therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted damage to very
slight or less.

561 127 and 129 High II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Holborn tunnels- building lies over the damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact
north tunnel and between the sensitivity score 2; confirmed further settlement
10mm settlement lines. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 69


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 32 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
564 14-16 (consec) II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Southampton tunnels- nos. 14-16 lie within damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact
Place) or on the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
lines. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted damage to very
slight or less.

557 7-8 Southampton II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Place tunnels- no. 8 lies on the damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact
10mm settlement line. sensitivity score 2; confirmed further settlement
therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 70


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 33 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
553 15-23 (odd) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Southampton Row tunnels- building lies partially damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact
- Sicilian Avenue on the 10mm settlement line. sensitivity score 3; confirmed, further settlement
Proximity to Fisher Street vent therefore overall potential analysis and inspections of
shaft construction. impact is particularly the building will be
significant. undertaken and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, structural
strengthening will be
provided to the parts of the
building sensitive to the
predicted ground movements
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

551 Central School of II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant
Arts and Crafts, tunnels- the south of the damage slight*; building techniques have been residual impact NSig.
Southampton Row building lies over the north sensitivity score 1; close confirmed, further settlement
tunnel. proximity to shaft; analysis and inspections of
therefore overall potential the building will be
Proximity to Fisher Street vent impact is particularly undertaken and the potential
shaft construction. significant. impact reviewed. If found
necessary, compensation
grouting may be undertaken
from a shaft within Kingsway
Tram Subway to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 71


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 34 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
551a Kingsway Tram II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Subway BAR tunnels- southern area lies damage severe to very techniques have been residual impact
within the 10mm settlement severe; building sensitivity confirmed, further settlement
lines. score 1; therefore overall analysis and inspections of
potential impact is the building will be
Proximity to Fisher Street vent particularly significant. undertaken and the potential
shaft construction. impact reviewed. If found
Buildings at Risk register necessary, bolts may be
indicates slow decay of loosened to cast iron
ramp area, but no segmentally lined circular
significant distress. section to allow the subway
to flex during settlements and
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels. For the box section –
possibly loosen connection
to cast iron section to allow
articulation at interface and
use crack inducers. Once
settlement has taken place
the bolts and connections
may be tightened and made
good.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 72


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 35 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
550 Carlisle House, II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
8&10 tunnels- building lies between damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
Southampton Row the north and south tunnel. building sensitivity score confirmed, further settlement
1; close proximity to shaft; analysis and inspections of
therefore overall potential the building will be
impact is particularly undertaken and the potential
significant. impact reviewed. If found
necessary, compensation
grouting may be undertaken
from a shaft within the
Kingsway Tram Subway to
reduce the predicted impact
to not significant levels.

547 & Baptist Church II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig When precise construction No significant NSig.
549 House, 2-6 (even) BAR tunnels- building lies within damage slight to techniques have been residual impact.
Southampton Row the 10mm settlement line. moderate; building confirmed further settlement
and Kingsgate sensitivity score 1; analysis and/or inspection of
House, 3 Catton Proximity to Fisher Street Vent therefore overall potential the building will be
Street (former Shaft. impact is significant. undertaken where
chapel) appropriate and the potential
Buildings at Risk register impact reviewed. If found
indicates that building is necessary, appropriate
under repair and there is protective measures (as
no significant distress. described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 73


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 36 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
545 11 & 12 Red Lion II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig When precise construction No significant NSig.
Square (Summit tunnels- rear of building lies damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
House) over south tunnel. sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

544 14-17 (consec) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig When precise construction No significant NSig.
Red Lion Square tunnels- rear of buildings lie damage very slight; techniques have been residual impact.
over south tunnel. building sensitivity score 1 confirmed further settlement
to 2; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 74


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.5 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C5 Sheet 37 of 37

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
540 31/32 Bedford II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig When precise construction No significant NSig.
Row (part of 29-32 tunnels- no. 32 lies on 10mm damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
Bedford Row) settlement line. sensitivity score 2; confirmed further settlement
therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

538 33-36 (consec) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig When precise construction No significant NSig.
Bedford Row tunnels-building lies within damage negligible to very techniques have been residual impact.
10mm settlement lines. slight; building sensitivity confirmed further settlement
score 1to 2; therefore analysis and/or inspection of
overall potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 75


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 1 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
530 Jockey’s Fields II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Wall tunnels – part of the wall lies negligible; building impact.
within the10mm settlement sensitivity score 0; therefore
lines. overall potential impact is
not significant.

531a 6&7 Bedford II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage Sig. When the precise No significant NSig.
Row (part of 1-7 tunnels- no. 7 lies on the 10mm very slight; building construction techniques residual impact.
Bedford Row) settlement line. sensitivity score 2; therefore have been confirmed
overall potential impact is further settlement analysis
significant. and/or inspection of the
building will be undertaken
where appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 76


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 2 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
531b 8-13 (consec.) II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When the precise No significant NSig.
Bedford Row tunnels-the buildings lie damage slight; building construction techniques have residual impact.
within the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 2; been confirmed further
lines. therefore overall potential settlement analysis and/or
impact is significant. inspection of the building
will be undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

531c 14 Bedford Row II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- the building lies damage very slight; impact.
within the 10mm settlement building sensitivity score
lines. 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

526 4 (part of 1-6) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Raymond tunnels- the south of the damage very slight; impact.
Buildings, Gray’s building lies within the 10mm building sensitivity score 1
Inn settlement lines. to 2; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 77


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 3 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
525 5 (part of 1-6) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When the precise No significant NSig.
Raymond tunnels- building lies over the damage very slight; construction techniques have residual impact.
Buildings, Gray’s north tunnel and within the building sensitivity score been confirmed further
Inn 10mm settlement lines. 2; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
potential impact is inspection of the building
significant. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

524 6 (part of 1-6) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When the precise No significant NSig.
Raymond tunnels- building lies between damage slight; building construction techniques have residual impact.
Buildings, Gray’s the tunnels. sensitivity score 2; been confirmed further
Inn therefore overall potential settlement analysis and/or
impact is significant. inspection of the building
will be undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 78


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 4 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
512 6 Gray’s Inn II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When the precise No significant NSig.
Square (part of tunnels- building lies within damage very slight; construction techniques have residual impact.
nos. 6, 7 and 8 the 10mm settlement lines. building sensitivity score been confirmed further
Gray’s Inn Square) 2; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
potential impact is inspection of the building
significant. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

516 8 Gray’s Inn II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When the precise No significant NSig.
Square (part of tunnels- building lies on the damage very slight; construction techniques have residual impact.
nos. 6, 7 and 8 10mm settlement line. building sensitivity score been confirmed further
Gray’s Inn Square) 2; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
potential impact is inspection of the building
significant. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 79


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 5 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
517 7 Gray’s inn II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When the precise No significant NSig.
Square (part of tunnels- building lies on the damage very slight; construction techniques have residual impact.
nos. 6, 7 and 8 10mm settlement line. building sensitivity score been confirmed further
Gray’s Inn Square) 2; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
potential impact is inspection of the building
significant. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

510 Sun dial, Gray’s II Bored twin segmental lined No significant impact. NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Inn Square tunnels- sundial lies over the impact.
south tunnel.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 80


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 6 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
502 14 Gray’s Inn II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When the precise No significant NSig.
Square (part of 12, tunnels- building lies on the damage very slight; construction techniques have residual impact.
13 & 14 Gray’s 10mm settlement line. building sensitivity score been confirmed further
Inn Square) 2; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
potential impact is inspection of the building
significant. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

504 13 Gray’s Inn II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When the precise No significant NSig.
Square (part of 12, tunnels- building lies over the damage very slight; construction techniques have residual impact.
13 & 14 Gray’s south tunnel. building sensitivity score been confirmed further
Inn Square) 2; therefore overall settlement analysis and/or
potential impact is inspection of the building
significant. will be undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 81


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 7 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
506 12 Gray’s Inn II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When the precise construction No significant NSig.
Square (part of 12, tunnels- building lies between damage very slight; techniques have been residual impact.
13 & 14 Gray’s the two tunnels with the building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
Inn Square) north-east of the building 2; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
lying over the north tunnel. potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where appropriate
and the potential impact
reviewed. If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted to
reduce the predicted impact to
not significant levels.

427 St. Alban’s II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When the precise construction No significant NSig.
Church, tunnels- the church lies over damage negligible*; techniques have been residual impact.
Dorrington/Brooke the north tunnel. building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
Street 2; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where appropriate
and the potential impact
reviewed. If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted to
reduce the predicted impact to
not significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 82


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 8 of 33

CR. Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig. Action Required and Mitigation
No Description Sig
426 St. Alban’s Clergy II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
House, 18 tunnels- building lies over the damage very slight; impact.
Dorrington St North tunnel. building sensitivity score
1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.
424a 10 & 11 Greville II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street tunnels- the building lies damage negligible; impact.
within the 10mm settlement building sensitivity score
lines. 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.
424b 19, 20, &21 II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Hatton Garden tunnels- the north of the damage negligible; impact.
building lies on the 10mm building sensitivity score
settlement lines. 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.
420 25&27 Farringdon II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When the precise construction No significant NSig.
Road tunnels- nos. 25 and 27 lie damage moderate; techniques have been confirmed residual impact.
between the tunnels. building sensitivity score further settlement analysis
2; therefore overall and/or inspection of the building
Proximity to construction of potential impact is will be undertaken where
deep concrete box for significant. appropriate and the potential
Cowcross Street ticket hall impact reviewed. If found
and adjoining necessary, appropriate
ventilation/escape shaft. protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will be
adopted to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 83


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 9 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
419 51-53 (consec.) II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Charterhouse St platform tunnels and cross damage severe to very techniques have been residual impact.
passage tunnel. The rear of severe; building sensitivity confirmed, further settlement
Nos. 51-53 lies over the south score 1; therefore overall analysis and inspections of the
tunnel and close to the cross potential impact is building will be undertaken
passage tunnel. particularly significant. and the potential impact
reviewed. If found necessary,
Proximity to construction of structural strengthening and
deep concrete box for new mechanical jacking may be
Cowcross Street ticket hall. carried out to the affected
columns and walls to reduce
the predicted impact to not
significant levels. Note that
these protective works are also
intended to protect the
(unlisted) plant in the building
as well as the historic
structure.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 84


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 10 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
429 54-60 (consec.) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Cowcross Street tunnels and sprayed moderate; building techniques have been residual impact.
concrete lined platform sensitivity score 2; therefore confirmed, further settlement
tunnels- nos. 54-60 lie overall potential impact is analysis and inspections of
within the 10mm settlement particularly significant due the building will be
lines. to proximity to deep undertaken and the potential
concrete box and bored impact reviewed. If found
Close proximity to tunnel. necessary, compensation
construction of deep grouting may be undertaken
concrete box for new from the excavation for the
Cowcross Street ticket hall. Cowcross Street ticket hall
and/or from a shaft to the rear
of 67 Cowcross Street to
reduce the predicted impact
to not significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 85


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 11 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
428 Farringdon II Proximity to deep concrete Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Station. incl. 36- box for new Cowcross Street damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
38 (consec.) and ticket hall. sensitivity score 2; confirmed further settlement
40-42 (consec.) therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
Cowcross Street Sprayed concrete lined impact is significant. the building will be
platform tunnels-The front of undertaken where
the station lies within the appropriate and the potential
10mm settlement contours. impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 86


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 12 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
430 101-102 Turnmill II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant impact. NSig.
Street & 32-35 platform tunnels- nos. 32-35 damage slight; building
(consec.) lie within the 10mm sensitivity score 0;
Cowcross Street settlement lines. therefore overall potential
impact is not significant.
Proximity to secant
piling/excavation Cowcross
Street end ticket hall box.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 87


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 13 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
431 26-27 Cowcross II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Street platform tunnels- nos. 26-27 damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
lie on the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
line. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

433 9-13 (consec) II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Cowcross Street platform tunnels- the damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
buildings lie on the 10mm sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
settlement line. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 88


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 14 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
432 14-16 (consec.) II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Cowcross Street platform tunnels- nos. 14-16 damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
lie on the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
line. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 89


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 15 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
434 94 Cowcross II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street platform tunnels- no. 94 lies damage very slight; impact.
just north of the south. building sensitivity score
1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

435 3&5 St John Street II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels- nos. 3 & 5 damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
lie between the tunnels. building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
1; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
Proximity to sprayed concrete potential impact is the building will be
lined cross passage tunnel significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 90


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 16 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
436 2-6 (even) St John II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Street (incl. 89 platform tunnels- the damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
Charterhouse buildings lie between the building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
Street) tunnels. 1; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
EC1 potential impact is the building will be
Proximity to sprayed concrete significant. undertaken where
lined passage tunnel and appropriate and the potential
escalator tunnels. impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 91


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 17 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
437 16 St John Street II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
platform tunnels- no.16 lies damage very slight; impact.
over the north tunnel. building sensitivity score
1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

438 18 and 20 St John II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street platform tunnels- the building damage very slight; impact.
lies within the 10mm building sensitivity score
settlement lines. 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

439 24 St John Street II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels- no.24 lies damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
on the 10mm settlement line. sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 92


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 18 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
414 22 St John Street II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels- no.22 lies damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
within the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
lines. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 93


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 19 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
412 26 St John Street II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
platform tunnels- the building damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
lies on the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
lines. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

410 115 Charterhouse II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Street platform tunnels- no. 115 lies damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
on the 10mm settlement line. sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
Proximity to Lindsey Street impact is significant. the building will be
secant piled station box and undertaken where
shafts. appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
Proximity to new emergency necessary, appropriate
escape shaft at Fox and Knot protective measures (as
Street. described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 94


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 20 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
410a 119 Charterhouse II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Street platform tunnels- the building damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact
lies on the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
line. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
Proximity to Lindsey Street undertaken where
secant piled station box and appropriate and the potential
shafts. impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
Proximity to new emergency protective measures (as
escape shaft at Fox and Knot described in Chapter 5) will
Street. be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 95


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 21 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
409 109-113 (odd) II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Charterhouse platform tunnels- nos. 109- damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
Street 113 lie between the 10mm sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
settlement line and the north therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
tunnel. impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
Proximity to Lindsey Street appropriate and the potential
secant piled station box and impact reviewed. If found
shafts. necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
Proximity to new emergency described in Chapter 5) will
escape shaft at Fox and Knot be adopted to reduce the
Street predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 96


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 22 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
408e 67-77 (odd) II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Charterhouse platform tunnels- 67-77 lies damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
Street between the north tunnel and building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
the 10mm settlement lines 1; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 97


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 23 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
454 Charterhouse II Sprayed concrete lined No significant impact. NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Square - platform tunnels- part of residual impact.
Railings around railings lies on 10mm
New Church settlement line.
Hawe and gates
on south side of Proximity to Fox and Knox
square Street shaft.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 98


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 24 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
408 West/East building II* Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Smithfield Market platform tunnels and cross damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
passage tunnels- the market building sensitivity score confirmed, further settlement
building lies partly within the 1; market in close analysis and inspections of
10mm settlement contours. proximity to proposed the building will be
excavation for Lindsey undertaken and the potential
Street ticket hall therefore impact reviewed. If found
overall potential impact is necessary, compensation
particularly significant. grouting may be undertaken
from a shaft in Fox and Knot
Street and/or Smithfield
Market basement to reduce
the predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Reduction of settlement due


to the construction of the
secant piled box is intended
to be achieved by
appropriate construction
techniques and sequencing.

Cont…

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 99


February 2005

Cont…

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
408 A new secant piled box will Underpinning to some Sig. It is intended to use No significant NSig.
cont… be built underneath the East existing walls and appropriate construction residual impact.
Market Building basement to columns. techniques and sequencing
house the lower end of the to reduce the predicted
Lindsey Street ticket hall impact to not significant
escalators. This will involve levels.
the local demolition of the car
park basement mezzanine
floor in order to construct the
secant piled walls. The East
Market columns and walls
over the secant piled box will
be underpinned and re-
supported on new beams,
which will bridge between
the walls of the excavation.
A new concrete walled box at
basement level will be
constructed as part of the
Lindsey Street ticket hall. This
box will extend under Lindsey
Street and will require the
demolition of some of the
original vaults to the East
Market building.
Proximity to new shafts at Fox
and Knot Street and between
and to the south of the
existing LUL and Thameslink
tracks.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 100


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 25 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
405a 74 & 75 Long II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Lane tunnels- no. 74 lies on the damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
10mm settlement line. sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
Proximity to Lindsey Street impact is significant. the building will be
secant piled station box and undertaken where
shafts. appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 101


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 26 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
401 133-134 II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig
Aldersgate Street tunnels- nos. 133-134 lie on damage negligible; impact.
the 10mm settlement line. building sensitivity score
1; therefore overall
Proximity to Barbican potential impact is not
crossover access shaft. significant.

338a Lauderdale Tower, II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Barbican crossover tunnel. The tower damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
lies on the 10mm settlement building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
line. 0; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
Proximity to segmental lined significant. undertaken where
and sprayed concrete lined appropriate and the potential
crossover tunnel access shaft. impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 102


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 27 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
338b Defoe House, II Defoe House lies directly over Potential settlement PSig. The adoption of the Variation No significant NSig.
Barbican the crossover tunnel. damage severe to very crossover construction using residual impact.
severe; building sensitivity two pairs of turnouts below
Proximity to segmental lined score 0; therefore overall Gilbert and Willoughby
and sprayed concrete lined potential impact is Houses will reduce the
crossover tunnel access shaft. particularly significant. potential settlement impact to
significant (Sig.). When
precise construction
techniques for the tunnelling
below Defoe House have
been confirmed, further
settlement analysis and/or
inspection of the building
will be undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 103


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 28 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
338c Shakespeare II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Tower, crossover tunnel. Building lies damage slight*, building techniques have been residual impact.
Barbican partially within the 10mm sensitivity score 0; confirmed further settlement
settlement lines. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 104


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 29 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
338d Arts and II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Conference crossover tunnel. damage slight*; building techniques have been residual impact.
Centre, Barbican The south of the centre lies sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
over the 10mm settlement therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
line. impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

338e Gilbert House, II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement PSig. It is intended that the No significant NSig.
Barbican tunnels-Gilbert House lies damage moderate; settlement from tunnelling, residual impact.
perpendicular and over the building sensitivity score including the construction of
tunnels. 0; therefore overall the trumpet-shaped turnout
potential impact is tunnel below Gilbert House,
significant. Adoption of will be reduced to not
the Variation crossover significant levels by selection
proposal is likely to of appropriate construction
increase the potential techniques and sequencing
impact to particularly (in-tunnel methods).
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 105


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 30 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
338f Willoughby II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
House, Barbican tunnels-Willoughby House damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
EC1 lies perpendicular and over building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
the tunnels 0; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. Adoption of undertaken where
the Variation crossover appropriate and the potential
proposal is not expected to impact reviewed. If found
change the potential necessary, appropriate
impact from significant. protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

338g Andrewes House, II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Barbican tunnels- north-east corner of damage very slight*; techniques have been residual impact.
building lies within the 10mm building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
settlement lines. 0; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 106


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 31 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
338h John Trundle II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Court crossover tunnel-John Trundle damage slight*; building techniques have been residual impact.
Court southern area lies partly sensitivity score 0; confirmed further settlement
within the 10mm settlement therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
lines. impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
Close proximity to segmental appropriate and the potential
lined and sprayed concrete impact reviewed. If found
lined crossover tunnel access necessary, appropriate
shaft. protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

338i Guildhall School II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
of Music and tunnels- Guildhall School of damage negligible*; techniques have been residual impact.
Drama Music and Drama lies building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
partially on the 10mm 1; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
settlement line. potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 107


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 32 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
338j Lambert Jones II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Mews crossover tunnel. damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
Barbican Lambert Jones Mews lies building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
partly within the 10mm 0; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
settlement lines. potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

338k Brandon Mews II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig
Barbican tunnels-Brandon Mews lies damage negligible; impact.
perpendicular and over the building sensitivity score
tunnels. 0; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 108


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.6 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C6 Sheet 33 of 33

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig
338l Podium, Barbican II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
tunnels and sprayed concrete damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
lined crossover tunnel – building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
structure lies within the 0; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
10mm settlement lines and potential impact is the building will be
over the tunnels. significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
Proximity to segmental lined impact reviewed. If found
and sprayed concrete lined necessary, appropriate
crossover tunnel access shaft. protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

338m The Lake, II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig
Barbican tunnels and sprayed concrete damage negligible; impact.
lined crossover tunnel. The building sensitivity score
lake lies directly over the 0; therefore overall
tunnels. potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 109


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.7 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C7 Sheet 1 of 16

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
327 137-141 (odd) II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Moorgate platform tunnels- nos. 137- damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
141 lie within the 10mm sensitivity score 2; confirmed further settlement
settlement lines. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
Proximity to new Moorgate undertaken where
ticket hall deep secant piled appropriate and the potential
box. impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

325 Britannic House II* Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
1-6 (consec.) platform tunnels-Britannic damage slight*; building techniques have been residual impact.
Finsbury Circus House lies within the 10mm sensitivity score 2; close confirmed, further settlement
settlement lines. proximity to open analysis and inspections of
excavation; therefore the building will be
Proximity to new Moorgate overall potential impact is undertaken and the potential
ticket hall deep secant piled particularly significant. impact reviewed. If found
box. necessary, compensation
grouting may be undertaken
from within the Moorgate
box excavation to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 110


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.7 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C7 Sheet 2 of 16

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
326 76-92 (even) II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Moorgate platform tunnels and cross damage slight*; building techniques have been residual impact.
passage tunnel- nos. 76-92 lie sensitivity score 1; close confirmed, further settlement
between the 10mm settlement proximity to shaft; analysis and inspections of
lines. therefore overall potential the building may be
impact is particularly undertaken and the potential
Nos. 76-92 lie over the significant. impact reviewed. If found
spheroidal graphite iron necessary, compensation
segmental lined escalator grouting may be undertaken
tunnel from within the Moorgate
box excavation to reduce the
Proximity to new Moorgate predicted impact to not
ticket hall deep secant piled significant levels.
box.

Temporary diversion of a Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
sewer pipe laid to the east damage to pavement techniques have been residual impact.
side of Moorgate between two vaults slight; building confirmed further settlement
diversion chamber shafts and sensitivity score 1; analysis and/or inspection of
behind a contiguous piled therefore potential impact the building will be
wall. is significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 111


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.7 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C7 Sheet 3 of 16

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
328 87 Moorgate II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. It is intended that the No significant NSig.
platform tunnels- no.87 lies damage very slight*; movement associated with residual impact.
between the 10mm settlement building sensitivity score the station box will be
lines. 1; close proximity to open reduced through design and
excavation; therefore appropriate construction
Directly next to new deep overall potential impact is methods and techniques to
secant piled box for Moorgate particularly significant. restrict the predicted impact
ticket hall. to not significant levels.

329 83 Moorgate II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. It is intended that the No significant NSig.
platform tunnels- no. 83 lies damage slight*; building movement associated with residual impact.
between the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 2; close the station box will be
lines. proximity to open reduced through design and
excavation; therefore appropriate construction
Close proximity to new deep overall potential impact is methods and techniques to
secant piled box ticket hall at particularly significant. restrict the predicted impact
Moorgate. to not significant levels.

332 8 Moorfields II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. It is intended that the No significant NSig.
platform tunnels- no. 8 lies damage very slight*; movement associated with residual impact.
between the 10mm settlement building sensitivity score the station box will be
lines. 1; close proximity to open reduced through design and
excavation; therefore appropriate construction
Directly next to new deep overall potential impact is methods and techniques to
secant piled box for Moorgate particularly significant. restrict the predicted impact
ticket hall. to not significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 112


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.7 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C7 Sheet 4 of 16

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
331 4 Moorfields II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. It is intended that the No significant NSig.
platform tunnels- no.4 lies damage slight*; building movement associated with residual impact.
between the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 1; close the station box will be
lines. proximity to open reduced through design and
excavation; therefore appropriate construction
Close proximity to new deep overall potential impact is methods and techniques to
secant piled box ticket hall at particularly significant. restrict the predicted impact
Moorgate. to not significant levels.

330 118 London II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Wall platform tunnels- no. 118 lies damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
between the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 2; confirmed further settlement
lines. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
Proximity to new deep secant undertaken where
piled box ticket hall at appropriate and the potential
Moorgate. impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.
333 59 - 73 (odd) II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Moorgate platform tunnels- nos. 69-73 damage very slight; impact.
EC2 lie within the 10mm building sensitivity score
settlement lines. 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 113


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.7 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C7 Sheet 5 of 16

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
334 2 Moorfields/ II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
118a London Wall platform tunnels- the building damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
EC2 lies within the 10mm sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
settlement lines. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
Proximity to new deep secant undertaken where
piled box ticket hall at appropriate and the potential
Moorgate. impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.
335 Armourers Hall, II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
81 Coleman Street SAM tunnels- the north of the damage very slight; impact.
building lies within the 10mm building sensitivity score
settlement lines. 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

323a Gazebo, Finsbury II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Circus platform tunnels- the Gazebo damage slight; building impact.
lies within the 10mm sensitivity score 0;
settlement lines. therefore overall potential
impact is not significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 114


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.7 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C7 Sheet 6 of 16

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
322 16 & 18 Finsbury II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Circus platform tunnels- the south of damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
the building lies within the sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
10mm settlement lines. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

321 22 & 23 Blomfield II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Street platform tunnels- nos. 22 &23 damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
lie within the 10mm building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
settlement lines. 1; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
Proximity to Blomfield Street significant. undertaken where
deep piled shaft. appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 115


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.7 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C7 Sheet 7 of 16

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
321a 25 Finsbury II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Circus, London platform tunnels and cross damage slight*; building techniques have been residual impact.
Wall Buildings passage tunnel- no.25 lies sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
within the 10mm settlement therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
lines. impact is significant. the building will be
undertaken where
Proximity to Finsbury Circus appropriate and the potential
Temporary Construction impact reviewed. If found
Shaft. necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
Proximity to Blomfield Street described in Chapter 5) will
deep piled shaft. be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.
326a 28-30 (consec.) II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Salisbury House, platform tunnels and cross damage slight*; building techniques have been residual impact.
Finsbury Circus passage tunnel- nos. 28-30 lie sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
within 10mm settlement lines. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
Nos. 28-30 lie over the undertaken where
spheroidal graphite lined appropriate and the potential
escalator tunnel. impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
Proximity to Finsbury Circus protective measures (as
Temporary construction shaft. described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 116


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.7 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C7 Sheet 8 of 16

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
320 Church of All I Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Hallows On The SAM platform tunnels- the church damage slight*; building techniques have been residual impact.
Wall lies within the 10mm sensitivity score 3; confirmed, further settlement
settlement lines. therefore overall potential analysis and inspections of
impact is particularly the building will be
significant. undertaken and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, compensation
grouting may be undertaken
from a shaft in New Broad
Street to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

319 56-60 and 62 II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
New Broad Street tunnel and sprayed concrete damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact.
lined platform tunnels- these building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
buildings lie within the 10mm 1; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
settlement lines. potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
Proximity to Blomfield Street appropriate and the potential
deep piled shaft. impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 117


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.7 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C7 Sheet 9 of 16

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
318 76-80 (Consec) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Old Broad Street tunnels- nos. 76-80 lie damage slight*; building techniques have been residual impact.
directly over the north tunnel. sensitivity score 2; confirmed further settlement
therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
Proximity to Liverpool Street impact is significant. the building will be
End piled box link tunnel undertaken where
from existing LUL to Crossrail appropriate and the potential
platforms. impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

339 Great Eastern II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Hotel, Liverpool tunnels- the south of the damage negligible; impact.
Street Station building lies within the 10mm building sensitivity score
settlement lines. 2; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 118


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.7 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C7 Sheet 10 of 16

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
313 Church of St II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Botolph tunnels- the church lies within damage negligible*; techniques have been residual impact.
Bishopsgate the 10mm settlement lines. building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
3; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where appropriate
and the potential impact
reviewed. If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted to
reduce the predicted impact to
not significant levels.
316 Police call box, II Bored twin segmental lined No significant impact. NSig. None needed. No significant NSig
Liverpool Street tunnels- the telephone box impact.
Station lies on the 10mm settlement
lines.
315 Church of St II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Botolph, tunnels- the Hall lies on the damage negligible; impact.
Bishopsgate 10mm settlement lines. building sensitivity score
Church Hall 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.
317 8 Bishopsgate II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Churchyard (old tunnels- the building lies damage negligible; impact.
Turkish Baths) within the 10mm settlement building sensitivity score
lines. 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 119


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.7 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C7 Sheet 11 of 16

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
314 / Bishopsgate II Bored twin segmental lined No significant impact. NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
312 Churchyard tunnels- the objects lie within impact.
Drinking Fountain, the 10mm settlement lines.
overthrows and
lanterns
310 162&164 II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Bishopsgate tunnels- nos. 162 & 164 lie negligible; building impact.
within the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 2; therefore
lines. overall potential impact is
not significant.
309 Rear 4-18 (even) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Devonshire Row tunnels- nos. 4-14 lie within negligible; building impact.
the 10mm settlement lines. sensitivity score 1; therefore
overall potential impact is
not significant.
308 5-7 (consec.) New II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street tunnels- nos. 5-7 lie within negligible; building impact.
the 10mm settlement lines. sensitivity score 2; therefore
overall potential impact is
not significant.
304 24 & 25 Widegate II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street tunnels- nos. 24 & 25 lie negligible; building impact.
within the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 1; therefore
lines. overall potential impact is
not significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 120


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.7 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C7 Sheet 12 of 16

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
301 16 New Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no. 16 lies within the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
10mm settlement lines. score 0; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

245 4A, Sandy's Row II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no. 4a lies within the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
10mm settlement lines. score 2; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

244 15 &16 Artillery II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Passage tunnels- the buildings lie negligible; building sensitivity impact.
within the 10mm settlement score 1; therefore overall
lines. potential impact is not
significant.

243 2 Artillery Passage II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no.2 lies within the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
10mm settlement lines. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

242 13 &14 Artillery II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Passage tunnels- nos.13 &14 lie within negligible; building sensitivity impact.
the 10mm settlement lines. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 121


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.7 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C7 Sheet 13 of 16

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
241 3 Artillery Passage II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no. 3 lies within the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
10mm settlement lines. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

240 4 Artillery Passage II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no. 4 lies within the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
10mm settlement lines. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

239 5 Artillery Passage II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no.5 lies on the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
10mm settlement line. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

238 41 Artillery Lane II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no. 41 lies within the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
10mm settlement lines. score 2; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

237 6 & 7 Artillery II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Passage tunnels- nos. 6 & 7 lie on the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
10mm settlement line. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 122


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.7 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C7 Sheet 14 of 16

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
235 9 & 10 Artillery II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Passage tunnels- no. 9 and 10 lie negligible; building sensitivity impact.
within the 10mm settlement score 1; therefore overall
line. potential impact is not
significant.

233 11 Gun Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no.11 lies on the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
10mm settlement line. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

232 40 Brushfield II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street tunnels- no.40 lies on the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
10mm settlement line. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

231 42 Brushfield II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street tunnels- no. 42 lies on the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
10mm settlement line. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

230a 56 Artillery Lane I Bored twin segmental lined No significant impact. Nsig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no. 56 lies outside impact.
the 10mm settlement
contours.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 123


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.7 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C7 Sheet 15 of 16

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
229 52 Brushfield II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street tunnels- no. 52 lies directly negligible; building sensitivity impact.
over the north tunnel. score 2; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

226 Spitalfields II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Market, tunnels- nos. 53-73 Brushfield negligible; building sensitivity impact.
Commercial Street Street and 103-109 score 1; therefore overall
Commercial Street lie within potential impact is not
the 10mm settlement lines. significant.

225 84 Commercial II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street tunnels- no.84 lies on the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
10mm settlement line. score 2; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

224 1 & 3 Fournier II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street tunnels- no. 1 lies on the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
10mm settlement line. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 124


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.7 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C7 Sheet 16 of 16

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
223 4-7 (consecutive) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Puma Court tunnels- nos. 4-7 lie within negligible; building sensitivity impact.
the 10mm settlement lines. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

220 17-25 (odd) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Wilkes Street tunnels- nos.17-25 lie within negligible; building sensitivity impact.
the 10mm settlement lines. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

219 11a & 15 Wilkes II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street tunnels- nos.15 and 11a lie negligible; building sensitivity impact.
within the 10mm settlement score 2; therefore overall
lines. potential impact is not
significant.

246 Christ Church I Bored twin segmental lined No significant impact. NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Spitalfields tunnels-the church lies impact.
outside the 10mm settlement
lines.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 125


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.8 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C8 Sheet 1 of 10

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
218 6 Wilkes Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no. 6 lies on the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
10mm settlement line. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

216 10 Wilkes Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no. 10 lies directly negligible; building sensitivity impact.
over the north tunnel. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

215 16 Wilkes Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no. 16 lies on the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
10mm settlement line. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

214 2&4 Princelet II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street tunnels- nos. 2&4 lie within negligible; building sensitivity impact.
the 10mm settlement lines. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

214a 12 Princelet Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels-the front of the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
building lies within the 10mm score 1; therefore overall
settlement lines. potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 126


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.8 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C8 Sheet 2 of 10

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
214b 14 Princelet Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels. The front of the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
building lies within the 10mm score 1; therefore overall
settlement lines. potential impact is not
significant.

214c 16 Princelet Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels. The front of the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
building lies within the 10mm score 1; therefore overall
settlement lines. potential impact is not
significant.

214d 18 Princelet Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels. The front of the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
building lies within the 10mm score 1; therefore overall
settlement lines. potential impact is not
significant.

214e 20 Princelet Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels. The front of the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
building lies within the 10mm score 1; therefore overall
settlement lines. potential impact is not
significant.

214f 22 Princelet Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels. The front of the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
building lies on the 10mm score 1; therefore overall
settlement lines. potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 127


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.8 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C8 Sheet 3 of 10

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
213 3&5 Princelet II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street tunnels- nos. 3 and 5 lie negligible; building sensitivity impact.
within the 10mm settlement score 2; therefore overall
lines. potential impact is not
significant.

212 9 Princelet Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no. 9 lies within the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
10mm settlement lines. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

211 13 Princelet Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no.13 lies directly negligible; building sensitivity impact.
over the south tunnel. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

211a 11 Princelet Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
BAR tunnels- no.11 lies directly negligible; building sensitivity impact.
over the south tunnel. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Buildings at Risk register


indicates slow decay and lack
of maintenance, but no
significant distress.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 128


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.8 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C8 Sheet 4 of 10

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
210 24&26 Hanbury II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Street tunnels- the rear of the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
buildings lie within the 10mm score 1; therefore overall
settlement lines. potential impact is not
significant.

209 15 Princelet Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- the front and the rear negligible; building sensitivity impact.
of the buildings lie directly score 1; therefore overall
over the tunnels. potential impact is not
significant.

209a 17 Princelet Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no.17 lies directly negligible; building sensitivity impact.
over the south tunnel. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

208 19 Princelet Street II* Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
BAR tunnels- no.19 lies directly negligible; building sensitivity impact.
over the south tunnel. score 2; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Buildings at Risk register


indicates slow decay and lack
of maintenance, but no
significant distress.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 129


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.8 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C8 Sheet 5 of 10

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
208a 21 Princelet Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no.21 lies directly negligible; building sensitivity impact.
over the south tunnel. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

208b 23 Princelet Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- the middle of the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
building lies directly over the score 1; therefore overall
south tunnel. potential impact is not
significant.

208c 25 Princelet Street II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- the rear of the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
building lies directly over the score 2; therefore overall
south tunnel. potential impact is not
significant.

207 34-38 (even) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Hanbury Street tunnels- the buildings lie negligible; building sensitivity impact.
within the 10mm settlement score 1; therefore overall
lines. potential impact is not
significant.

207a 114-122 (even) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Brick Lane tunnels- nos. 114-122 lie negligible; building sensitivity impact.
within the 10mm settlement score 1; therefore overall
lines. potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 130


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.8 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C8 Sheet 6 of 10

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
202 35 Buxton Street II Pedley Street temporary Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed No significant NSig.
E1 running tunnel- no.35 lies on negligible; building sensitivity impact.
the 10mm settlement line. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

200a 261 & 263 II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement damage Sig. When precise No significant NSig.
Whitechapel Road platform tunnels-the rear of slight*; building sensitivity construction techniques residual impact.
the building lies within the score 1; therefore overall have been confirmed
10mm settlement lines. potential impact is significant. further settlement analysis
and/or inspection of the
Proximity to secant piled box building will be
for interchange with LUL and undertaken where
possible alternative ticket hall. appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 131


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.8 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C8 Sheet 7 of 10

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
200b 265 &267 II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement damage Sig. When precise No significant NSig.
Whitechapel Road platform tunnels- the rear of slight; building sensitivity construction techniques residual impact.
the building lies within the score 1; therefore overall have been confirmed
10mm settlement lines. potential impact is significant. further settlement analysis
and/or inspection of the
Proximity to secant piled box building will be
for interchange with LUL and undertaken where
possible alternative ticket hall. appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 132


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.8 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C8 Sheet 8 of 10

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
200 333-335 (odd) II Sprayed concrete lined Potential settlement damage PSig. When precise No significant NSig.
Whitechapel Road platform tunnels and cross moderate; building sensitivity construction techniques residual impact.
passage tunnel- the rear of the score 1; building in close have been confirmed,
building lies directly over the proximity to open excavation; further settlement analysis
south tunnel and close to the therefore overall potential and inspections of the
cross passage tunnel. impact is particularly building may be
significant. undertaken and the
Proximity to new spheroid potential impact reviewed.
graphite iron segmental lined If found necessary,
escalator compensation grouting
may be undertaken from a
Proximity to new spheroid shaft in the proposed
graphite iron segmental lined worksite behind Nos. 333-
escalator tunnel. 335 Whitechapel Road to
reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.
Proximity to new
Whitechapel station ticket
hall box shaft (Cambridge
heath end).
Proximity to new access shaft
for Cambridge Heath ticket
hall.

199 Outside Entrance II Sprayed concrete lined No impact. NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
block to Albion platform tunnels- the impact.
Brewery- telephone kiosk lies on the
Telephone Kiosk 10mm settlement line.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 133


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.8 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C8 Sheet 9 of 10

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
198 Outside No 21 II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Mile End Road, tunnels- the statue lies on the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
north side- 10mm settlement line. score 1; therefore overall
Bust of William potential impact is not
Booth significant.

197 Mile End Road, I Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage Sig. When precise No significant NSig.
north side: 1-10 tunnels- nos. 1-8 and 25-30 slight; building sensitivity construction techniques residual impact.
Trinity Green & lie within the 10mm score 2; therefore overall have been confirmed
22- 30 Trinity settlement lines. potential impact is significant. further settlement analysis
Green and/or inspection of the
building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the
potential impact reviewed.
If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

197b 29 Mile End Road II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnels- no. 29 lies within the negligible; building sensitivity impact.
10mm settlement lines. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 134


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.8 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C8 Sheet 10 of 10

CR. Action required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No mitigation Description Sig.
196 outside 39 Mile II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
End Road- tunnels- the statue lies within negligible; building sensitivity impact.
Bust of Edward VII the 10mm settlement lines. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

195 Mile End Road, II Bored twin segmental lined No significant impact. NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
south side- tunnels- the fountain lies on impact.
Drinking Fountain the 10mm settlement lines.

194 82- 84 (even) Mile II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
End Road tunnels- nos. 82-84 lie within very slight; building impact.
the 10mm settlement lines. sensitivity score 1; therefore
overall potential impact is not
significant.

193 90-110 (even) II Bored twin segmental line Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Mile End Road tunnels- nos. 90-108 lie on negligible; building sensitivity impact.
the 10mm settlement lines. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 135


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.9 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C9 Sheet 1 of 5

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
192 Church of St I Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Dunstan and All tunnels with step-plate damage very slight*; techniques have been residual impact
Saints, Stepney junction. The Church lies building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
High Street between the northern tunnel 3; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
branches and across the potential impact is the building will be
10mm settlement lines. significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

192a Baptist Chapel No Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Walls grade tunnel with step-plate damage moderate; techniques have been residual impact
junction The walls lie building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
between the 10mm settlement 1; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
lines and adjacent to the potential impact is the building will be
crossover. significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 136


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.9 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C9 Sheet 2 of 5

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
192b Congregational No Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed No significant NSig.
Church walls grade tunnel with step-plate very slight; building impact
junction- the walls lie within sensitivity score 1; therefore
the 10mm settlement lines. overall potential impact is not
significant.

191 1-10 (consec.) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed No significant NSig.
Mercers’ Cottages, tunnel- nos. 3-10 lie within very slight; building impact
Whitehorse Road the 10mm settlement lines. sensitivity score 0; therefore
overall potential impact is not
significant.

190 34-40 (even) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed No significant NSig.
Belgrave Street tunnel-the building lies negligible; building sensitivity impact
between the 10mm settlement score 1; therefore overall
lines. potential impact is not
significant.

189 50-52 (even) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed No significant NSig.
Belgrave Street tunnel-the building lies negligible; building sensitivity impact
between the 10mm settlement score 1; therefore overall
lines. potential impact is not
significant.

187 19-31 (odd) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed No significant NSig.
Barnes Street, west tunnel- nos. 23-31 lie negligible; building sensitivity impact
side between the 10mm settlement score 1; therefore overall
lines. potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 137


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.9 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C9 Sheet 3 of 5

CR. Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig. Action Required and Residual Impact
No Mitigation Description Sig.
186 12-22 (even) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed No significant NSig.
Barnes Street tunnel-the building lies negligible; building sensitivity impact
between the 10mm settlement score 1; therefore overall
lines. potential impact is not
significant.

184 1-8 (consec.) York II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed No significant NSig.
Square tunnel- Nos. 1-5 lie between negligible; building sensitivity impact
the 10mm settlement lines. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

183 9-16 (consec.) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed No significant NSig.
York Square tunnel-the building lies negligible; building sensitivity impact
between the 10mm settlement score 1; therefore overall
lines. potential impact is not
significant.

182 1A Flamborough II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed No Significant NSig.
Street tunnel-the building lies partly negligible; building sensitivity impact
on the 10mm settlement line. score 0; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

181 3-7 Flamborough II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed No Significant NSig.
Street tunnel-the building lies negligible; building sensitivity impact
between the 10mm settlement score 1; therefore overall
lines. potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 138


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.9 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C9 Sheet 4 of 5

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


No Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig. Mitigation Description Sig.
181a Hawthorn II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed No Significant NSig.
& Cottage, 1 tunnel-No. 1 lies between the negligible; building sensitivity impact
181b Flamborough 10mm settlement lines. score 0; therefore overall
Walk potential impact is not
and Rose Cottage, significant.
Flamborough
Walk
181c Devonshire II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed No Significant NSig.
Cottage, tunnel-Devonshire Cottage negligible; building sensitivity impact
Flamborough lies within the 10mm score 0; therefore overall
Walk settlement contours. potential impact is not
significant.

181d Durham Villa, II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed No significant NSig.
Flamborough tunnel-Durham Villa lies negligible; building sensitivity impact
Walk directly above the north score 0; therefore overall
tunnel. potential impact is not
significant.

180 8 Flamborough II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed No significant NSig.
Street tunnel- no. 8 lies partly on the negligible; building sensitivity impact
10mm settlement lines. score 0; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

178 16-21 (consec.) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed No significant NSig.
Flamborough tunnel- no. 21 lies partly on negligible; building sensitivity impact
Street the 10mm settlement lines. score 0; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 139


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.9 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C9 Sheet 5 of 5

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


No Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig. Mitigation Description Sig.
178a 22-24 (consec.) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed No significant NSig.
Flamborough tunnel- no. 22 lies on the negligible; building sensitivity impact
Street 10mm settlement line. score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 140


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.10 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C10 Sheet 1 of 4

CR. Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig. Committed Mitigation
No Description Sig.
175, 604-608 (even) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
176, Commercial Road tunnels- nos. 604-608 lie damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
177 directly over the north tunnel. sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
Proximity to Lowell Street impact is significant. the building will be
ventilation and intervention undertaken where
shaft. appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

177a 683-691 (odd) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Commercial Road tunnels- the buildings lie damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
within the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
lines. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
Proximity to Lowell Street undertaken where
ventilation and intervention appropriate and the potential
shaft. impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 141


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.10 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C10 Sheet 2 of 4

CR. Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig. Committed Mitigation
No Description Sig.
177b 699-711 (odd) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Commercial Road tunnels- the buildings lie damage slight; building techniques have been residual impact.
within the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 1; confirmed further settlement
contours. therefore overall potential analysis and/or inspection of
impact is significant. the building will be
Proximity to Lowell Street undertaken where
ventilation and intervention appropriate and the potential
shaft. impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 142


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.10 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C10 Sheet 3 of 4

CR. Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig. Committed Mitigation
No Description Sig.
174 Commercial Road II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement PSig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Bridge tunnels-the bridge lies within damage slight*; building techniques have been residual impact.
10mm settlement lines sensitivity score 2; close confirmed, further settlement
proximity to shaft; therefore analysis and inspections of the
Proximity to Lowell Street overall potential impact is building will be undertaken
ventilation and intervention significant. and the potential impact
shaft. reviewed. If found necessary,
the bridge bearings may be
checked to see they are
capable of accommodating the
predicted movements.
Structural modifications may
then be made as necessary.
The type and condition of
existing bridge piers will also
be investigated. The predicted
impact will be reduced to not
significant levels.
173 DLR Viaduct, II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement PSig. It is intended that the predicted No significant NSig.
Commercial Road tunnels- the viaduct has piers damage negligible*; ground movements will be residual impact.
directly above and in close building sensitivity score 0; reduced through design and
proximity to both tunnels. close proximity to shaft; appropriate construction
therefore overall potential methods and techniques to
Close proximity to Lowell impact is particularly restrict the predicted impact to
Street ventilation and significant. not significant levels.
intervention shaft.
It is also intended to use
instrumentation to monitor the
movements and repair the
bridge locally where necessary.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 143


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.10 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C10 Sheet 4 of 4

CR. Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig. Committed Mitigation
No Description Sig.
172 Mill Place II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Accumulator tunnels- the tower lies damage slight; building impact.
Tower between the 10mm settlement sensitivity score 0;
West Side lines. therefore overall potential
impact is significant.
Close proximity to Lowell
Street ventilation and
intervention shaft.

171 Library on II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Commercial Road tunnels-the library lies damage negligible; impact.
partially above the north building sensitivity score
tunnel. 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 144


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.11 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C11 Sheet 1 of 2

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
168 Cannon II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Workshop, tunnel. The south of the damage very slight; impact.
East Block & block lies within the 10mm building sensitivity score
Entrance, settlement lines. 1; therefore overall
3-5 (odd) Cannon potential impact is not
Drive significant.

167 Cannon II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Workshop, tunnel- the centre of the damage negligible; impact
South and West building lies over the south building sensitivity score
Wings, tunnel. 0; therefore overall
92-116 (even) potential impact is not
Cannon Drive significant.

167a Cannon II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Workshop, tunnel - the building lies damage negligible; impact.
Central directly over the north tunnel. building sensitivity score
Warehouse, 0; therefore overall
135-167 (odd) potential impact is not
Cannon Drive significant.

166 West India Docks, I Construction of Isle of Dogs Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
North Import station box- the station will lie damage slight; building impact.
Dock Walls, within the dock walls. sensitivity score 0;
Isle of Dogs therefore overall potential
An alternate station entrance impact is not significant.
may be provided to the north
of the dock walls.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 145


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.11 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C11 Sheet 2 of 2

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
164 Preston's Road II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Poplar Dock tunnel. The northern end of damage very slight; impact
the dock walls lie within the building sensitivity score
10mm settlement lines. 0; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

163 Preston's Road II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Hydraulic tunnel- the accumulator lies damage negligible; impact
Accumulator within the 10mm settlement building sensitivity score
lines. 0; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 146


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.12 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window C12 Sheet 1 of 1

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
1134 35-49 Arnold II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Road (consec) tunnel- nos. 45-49 lie within damage negligible; impact.
including railings the 10mm settlement lines. building sensitivity score
1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

1102 Drapers II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
Almshouses, tunnel- the building lies damage very slight; techniques have been residual impact.
Railway Way between the two tunnels and building sensitivity score confirmed further settlement
(formerly Priscilla partially over the 10mm 2; therefore overall analysis and/or inspection of
Road) settlement line. potential impact is the building will be
significant. undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

1101 110 Bow Road II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
tunnel- no. 110 lies directly damage negligible; impact.
above the north tunnel. building sensitivity score
1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 147


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 6.13 Schedule of Impacts for Route Windows C13 Sheet 1 of 1

CR. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
1103 2-22 (even) II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement impact NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
Fairfield Road tunnel- no. 2 lies within the very slight; building impact.
10mm settlement lines. sensitivity score 1;
therefore overall potential
impact is not significant.

1104 163 Bow Road II Bored twin segmental lined Potential settlement impact Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
tunnel- no. 163 lies on the slight; building sensitivity techniques have been residual impact.
10mm settlement lines. score 2; therefore overall confirmed further settlement
potential impact is analysis and/or inspection of
significant. the building will be
undertaken where
appropriate and the potential
impact reviewed. If found
necessary, appropriate
protective measures (as
described in Chapter 5) will
be adopted to reduce the
predicted impact to not
significant levels.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 148


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 7.1 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window SE1 to SE8 Sheet 1 of 3

C.R. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
1440 Warehouse K, II The north-west corner of the The area of the warehouse NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
(SE2) Royal Victoria BAR curtilage of the warehouse is within the zone of influence residual impact.
Dock assumed to lie within the is on deep piled foundations,
settlement zone of influence except for a ground bearing
of the sewer diversion tunnel. floor slab. There may be
The tunnel will be of some slight settlement effects
segmental concrete lined on the floor slab, but this is of
construction. recent construction and not
of historical significance, so
potential settlement damage
is assumed to be negligible;
building sensitivity score 1;
therefore overall potential
impact is not significant.

Buildings at Risk register


indicates slow decay but
repairs are now complete and
concern has been removed.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 149


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 7.1 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window SE1 to SE8 Sheet 2 of 3

C.R. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
1442 North Woolwich II The station (including the Potential settlement damage Sig. When precise construction No significant NSig.
(SE4) Station, Pier Road listed station building, slight; building sensitivity techniques have been residual impact.
lampposts and railway score 1; therefore overall confirmed further
turntable) lie over the potential impact is significant. settlement analysis and /or
proposed bored twin running inspection of the building
tunnels. The platforms, which will be undertaken where
form part of the curtilage of appropriate and the
the listed building, also lie potential impact reviewed.
over the tunnels. If found necessary,
appropriate protective
measures (as described in
Chapter 5) will be adopted
to reduce the predicted
impact to not significant
levels.

1444 Royal Brass I The Royal Brass Foundry lies Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
(SE5) Foundry, directly over the proposed negligible; building sensitivity residual impact.
Plumstead Road. bored twin running tunnels. score 2;therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

1446 Main Guard II The main guard room lies to Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
(SE5) Room, Plumstead the south of the twin tunnels very slight; building residual impact.
Road and within the 10mm sensitivity score 0; therefore
settlement lines. overall potential impact is not
significant.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 150


February 2005

Crossrail
Table 7.1 Schedule of Impacts for Route Window SE1 to SE8 Sheet 3 of 3

C.R. Action Required and Residual Impact


Address Grade Proposed Works Potential Impact Sig.
No Mitigation Description Sig.
1447 Verbruggen’s II Verbruggen’s House lies over Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
(SE5) House, Plunstead the southern tunnel. negligible; building sensitivity residual impact.
Road score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

1448 Officer’s Quarters, II The Officer’s Quarters lies to Potential settlement damage NSig. None needed. No significant NSig.
(SE5) Plumstead Road BAR the north of the twin tunnels. negligible; building sensitivity residual impact.
score 1; therefore overall
potential impact is not
significant.

Buildings at Risk register


indicates slow decay and lack
of maintenance, but no
significant distress.

Note: See Table of Cross-References for corresponding Phase 3 Iteration 1 Report numbers.
Building sensitivity scores range from 1 (Low) to 4 (High) - See Chapter 4 for details of scores and methodology.
Settlement damage categories range from negligible to very severe.
Significance means: NSig. = Not Significant; Sig. = Significant; PSig. = Significant Impact of Particular Importance.
* - Requires further settlement analysis to confirm score, meanwhile assume settlement impact is significant (Sig.) - See Chapter 4 for details.
Buildings are generally listed in order, running west to east, and descending Crossrail Reference Number (CR No.).

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 151


Crossrail

Table of Cross-References
Extracted from Mott MacDonald's
Phase 3 Iteration 1 Status Listing

City of Westminster

Address CR Ref MM Ref Address CR Ref MM Ref

18-24 Hyde Park Gardens 701 WES-L-10001 229-223 Regent Street 608 WES-L-20002

25-28 Hyde Park Gardens (22-28 Stanhope Terrace) 710 WES-L-10002 235-241 Regent Street 607 WES-L-20003

129 Park Lane (24 Dunraven Street) 6103 WES-L-10005 225 & 227 Regent Street (21 Hanover Street) 601 WES-L-20005

32 Green Street 699 WES-L-10009 223 Regent Street (4 Maddox Street) 602 WES-L-20006

10 Green Street 689 WES-L-10010 224 -244 Regent Street 5235 WES-L-20007

23 Lees Place 687 WES-L-10011 210-222 Regent Street/ 45 Kingly Street 5234 WES-L-20008

61 Green Street 686 WES-L-10012 25 Great Marlborough Street 5230 WES-L-20010

1 Green Street/ 29 North Audley Street 679-684 WES-L-10013 1-4 Argyll Street 5233 WES-L-20012

11-12 North Audley Street 677 WES-L-10017 7-8 Argyll Street. London Palladium 5231 WES-L-20013

St Marks Church North Audley Street 676 WES-L-10018 19-21 Great Marlborough Street 5228 WES-L-20014

Brown Hart Gardens 675 WES-L-10019 48 Great Marlborough Street 5218 WES-L-20015

669 &
71 & 73 Duke Street WES-L-10020 15 Poland Street/ 5 Noel Street 5214 WES-L-20016
670

Ukranian Catholic Church (Duke Street) 667 WES-L-10021 67 Berwick Street/ 21a Noel Street 5205 WES-L-20018

75-83 Duke Street 666 WES-L-10022 13 D'Arblay Street 5209 WES-L-20020

Westbourne Bridge 740 WES-L-10023 1-2 Duke's Yard & 85 Duke Street 664 WES-L-20021

Paddington Station- MacMillan House 731 WES-L-10024 27 Gilbert Street 661 WES-L-20022

Great Western Hotel. Praed Street 730 WES-L-10025 51 & 53 Davies Street & 66 Brook Street 653 WES-L-20023

Spring Street. W2 726 WES-L-10026 58 Davies Street 645 WES-L-20024

5-7 Craven Road 727 WES-L-10027 50 Davies Street 637 WES-L-20025

193-209 (odd) Sussex Gardens 714 WES-L-10028 52-54 Davies Street 637 WES-L-20026

194-196 Sussex Gardens 723 WES-L-10030 1-7 Davies Mews & 28-30 South Molton Lane 636 WES-L-20027

184-190 (even) Sussex Gardens 722 WES-L-10031 40-46 Brook Street (North Side) 635 WES-L-20028

1 Cleveland Terrace 734 WES-L-10033 26 South Molton Street 647 WES-L-20029

Paddington Station- Brunel Shed 731 WES-L-10034 24-25 South Molton Street 646 WES-L-20030

Paddington Station- Span 4 731 WES-L-10035 21 South Molton Street 644 WES-L-20031

Paddington Station- Lawn 731 WES-L-10036 19-20 South Molton Street 643 WES-L-20032

14 North Audley Street 676a WES-L-10037 50 South Molton Street 642 WES-L-20033

Paddington Underground Station, Praed Street 796 WES-L-10038 18 South Molton Street 641 WES-L-20034

15 Hanover Street 6111 WES-L-20001 17 South Molton Street 640 WES-L-20035

14-16 South Molton Street 639 WES-L-20036 5 Carlisle Street 5180 WES-L-30049

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 152


10-12 South Molton Street 638 WES-L-20037 4 Carlisle Street 5179 WES-L-30050

63 South Molton Street 634 WES-L-20038 90 Dean Street 5181 WES-L-30051

20 Brook Street 625 WES-L-20039 89 Dean Street 5178 WES-L-30052

103 New Bond Street 624 WES-L-20040 88 Dean Street 5177 WES-L-30053

74 New Bond Street 623 WES-L-20041 4-6 Soho Sq./ 6 Dean Street 5173 WES-L-30054

20 Hanover Square 618/619 WES-L-20043 3 Soho Sq./ 7 Dean Street 5172 WES-L-30055

21 Hanover Square 617 WES-L-20044 2 Soho Sq./ 8 Dean Street 5171 WES-L-30056

Statue of William Pitt 615 WES-L-20046 38/38a Soho Square 5170 WES-L-30057

24 Hanover Square. Mayfair. W1 611 WES-L-20048 37 Soho Square 5168 WES-L-30058

16 Hanover Square 616 WES-L-20049 10 & 10a Soho Sq. 5167 WES-L-30059

9 Dering Street. W1 622 WES-L-20050 8/9 Soho Sq. 5169 WES-L-30060

360-366 Oxford Street 657 WES-L-20051 19 Carlisle Street 5166 WES-L-30061

46 Berwick Street 5207 WES-L-20052 36 Soho Square 5165 WES-L-30062

47 Berwick Street 5201 WES-L-20053 13 Soho Sq. 5160 WES-L-30063

48 Berwick Street 5202 WES-L-20054 15 Soho Sq. 5159 WES-L-30064

7 Hanover Street 6111a WES-L-20055 21 Soho Sq. 5154 WES-L-30065

41 South Molton Street 648 WES-L-20056 St Patrick's Presbytry 5152 WES-L-30066

68 Brook Street 6172 WES-L-20057 St Patricks RC Chuch, Soho Square 5145 WES-L-30067

5 Noel Street 5200 WES-L-30037 29 & 30 Soho Square The Hospital For Women 5155 WES-L-30071

187 WardourStreet 5199 WES-L-30038 26 Soho Sq. 5150 WES-L-30072

2-4 D'Arblay Street 5195 WES-L-30039 3 Greek Street 5153 WES-L-30073

5143/5
105-109 Oxford Street (& 16 - 18 Hollen Street) 5189 WES-L-30042 1 Greek Street WES-L-30074
147

152-160 Wardour Street 5188 WES-L-30043 14 Manette Street 5142 WES-L-30075

17 Carlisle Street 5183 WES-L-30047 16/17 Manette Street 5139 WES-L-30076

6 Carlisle Street 5182 WES-L-30048 Soho Square, Shelter 5198 WES-L-30079

Camden

Pheonix Theatre, 110 Charing Cross Road 5128 CAM-L-30001 51-53 Endell Street 589 CAM-L-30008

12 Flitcroft Street 5128A CAM-L-30002 Shaftsbury Theatre, 210 Shaftsbury Ave. 593 CAM-L-30010

59 St Giles High Street 5129 CAM-L-30003 22 Endell Street 587 CAM-L-30011

1-5 Flitcroft Street 5124 CAM-L-30004 197-198 High Holborn (Holborn Town Hall) 574 CAM-L-30013

21 Monmouth Street 5113 CAM-L-30005 199-201 High Holborn (199-206?) 570 CAM-L-30014

55 Neal Street 5105 CAM-L-30006 17a Macklin Street 575 CAM-L-30015

64 Neal Street 5102 CAM-L-30007 8a Smarts Place 579 CAM-L-30016

23 Macklin Street 567 CAM-L-30017 11-12 Red Lion Square, Summit House 545 CAM-L-40006

25 Macklin Street (24 Strukely Street) 566 CAM-L-30018 14-17 Red Lion Square 544 CAM-L-40007

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 153


207 High Holborn 563 CAM-L-30019 31-32 Bedford Row 540 CAM-L-40008

208 High Holborn 560 CAM-L-30020 33-36 Bedford Row 538 CAM-L-40009

212 High Holborn 554 CAM-L-30021 4-15 Bedford Row 531 CAM-L-40012

14-15 Southampton Place 564 CAM-L-30022 4 Raymond Buildings, Jockey's Fields 526 CAM-L-40013

127-129 High Holborn 561 CAM-L-30023 5 Raymond Buildings, Jockey's Fields 525 CAM-L-40014

7-8 Southampton Place 557 CAM-L-30024 6 Raymond Buildings, Jockey's Fields 524 CAM-L-40015

17-23 Southampton Row/ Kingsway 553 CAM-L-30025 6 Gray's Inn Square 512 CAM-L-40016

27 Denmark St 5130 CAM-L-30029 7 Gray's Inn Square 517 CAM-L-40017

9/10 Denmark St 5134 CAM-L-30030 8 Gray's Inn Square 516 CAM-L-40018

20 Denmark Street & 16 Denmark Place 5135 CAM-L-30035 12 Gray's Inn Square 506 CAM-L-40020

Southampton Row, Kingsway Tram Subway 551A CAM-L-30036 13 Gray's Inn Square 504 CAM-L-40021

Centrepoint Tower 5138A CAM-L-30077 14 Gray's Inn Square 503 CAM-L-40022

26 Denmark Street 5131 CAM-L-30078 St Alban's Church 427 CAM-L-40023

Centrepoint House 5138A CAM-L-30080 St Alban's Clergy House 426 CAM-L-40024

7 Denmark Street 5132 CAM-L-30081 10-11 Greville Street 424a CAM-L-40025

Central School of Arts and Crafts, S. Row 551 CAM-L-40002 19-21 Hatton Gardens 424b CAM-L-40026

Façade to Carlisle House, 8-10 Southampton Row 550 CAM-L-40003 Painting Works, 25-27 Farringdon Road 420 CAM-L-40027

Kingsgate House, 3 Catton Street 547 CAM-L-40004 21 Ely Place 421 CAM-L-40028

2 - 6 Southampton Row 549 CAM-L-40005 Jockey's Fields Wall 530 CAM-L-40029

Islington

Farringdon Stn. Incl 36-38 and 40-42 Cowcross St 428 ISL-L-50002 24 St John St 439 ISL-L-50012

101-102 Turnmill St & 32-35 Cowcross St 430 ISL-L-50003 22 St John St 414 ISL-L-50013

26-27 Cowcross St 431 ISL-L-50004 26 St John St 412 ISL-L-50014

9-13 (consec) Cowcross St 433 ISL-L-50005 51-53 Charterhouse St 419 ISL-L-50015

14-16 Cowcross St 432 ISL-L-50006 115 Charterhouse St 410 ISL-L-50016

94 Cowcross St 434 ISL-L-50007 119 Charterhouse St. 410a ISL-L-50017

3&5 St John St 435 ISL-L-50008 22 Charterhouse Sq. 410b ISL-L-50018

2-6 St John St (incl 89 Charterhouse street) 436 ISL-L-50009 109-113 Charterhouse St 409 ISL-L-50019

16 St John St 437 ISL-L-50010 67-77 Charterhouse St 408e ISL-L-50020

18 and 20 St John St 438 ISL-L-50011 54-60 Cowcross Street 429 ISL-L-50021

City of London

West/East building Smithfield Market 408 CIT-L-50022 24 & 25 Widegate Street 304 CIT-L-60008

74 Long Lane 405A CIT-L-50027 137-141 Moorgate 327 CIT-L-60051

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 154


Lauderdale Tower, Barbican 338a CIT-L-50030 1-6 Finsbury Circus 325 CIT-L-60052

Defoe House, Barbican 338b CIT-L-50031 76-92 Moorgate 326 CIT-L-60053

Shakespeare Tower, Barbican 338c CIT-L-50032 87 Moorgate 328 CIT-L-60054

Arts and Conference Centre, Barbican 338d CIT-L-50033 83 Moorgate 329 CIT-L-60055

Gilbert House, Barbican 338e CIT-L-50034 8 Moorfields 332 CIT-L-60056

Willoughby House, Barbican 338f CIT-L-50035 4 Moorfields 331 CIT-L-60057

Andrews House, Barbican 338g CIT-L-50036 118a London Wall 330 CIT-L-60058

Guildhall School of Music and Drama, Barbican 338i CIT-L-50037 67-73 Moorgate 333 CIT-L-60059

1-8 Lambert Jones Mews, Barbican 338j CIT-L-50038 2 Moorfields/ 118 London Wall 334 CIT-L-60060

Brandon Mews, Barbican 338k CIT-L-50039 Armours Hall, 81 Coleman Street 335 CIT-L-60061

Podium, Barbican 338l CIT-L-50040 Centre Finsbury circus 323a CIT-L-60062

The Lake, Barbican 338m CIT-L-50041 16 & 18 Finsbury Circus 322 CIT-L-60063

133-4 Aldersgate St 401 CIT-L-50042 22 & 23 Blomfield St 321 CIT-L-60064

John Trundle House, Barbican 338h CIT-L-50043 25, London wall Buildings, Finsbury Circus 321a CIT-L-60065

St Botolphs Church 313 CIT-L-60001 28-30, Salisbury House, Finsbury Circus, 326A CIT-L-60066

St Botolphs Church Hall 315 CIT-L-60002 Church of All Hallows on the Wall 320 CIT-L-60067

162 & 164 Bishopsgate 310 CIT-L-60003 56-60 and 62 New broad St 319 CIT-L-60068

Rear of 4-18 Devonshire Row 309 CIT-L-60004 76-80 (Consec) old Broad St 318 CIT-L-60069

5-7 New Street 308 CIT-L-60005 Great Eastern Hotel, Liverpool St Station 339 CIT-L-60070

16 New Street 301 CIT-L-60006 8 Bishopsgate Churchyard 317 CIT-L-60073

Tower Hamlets

Sandy Row Synagogue, 4a Sandy Row 245 TOW-L-60009 11 Gun Street 233 TOW-L-60023

15 & 16 Artillery Passage 244 TOW-L-60010 40 Brushfield Street 232 TOW-L-60024

13 & 14 Artillery Passage 242 TOW-L-60011 42 Brushfield Street 231 TOW-L-60025

9 & 10 Artillery Passage 235 TOW-L-60012 52 Brushfield Street 229 TOW-L-60026

2 Artillery Passage 243 TOW-L-60013 Spitalfields Market 226 TOW-L-60027

3 Artillery Passage 241 TOW-L-60014 84 Commerical Street 225 TOW-L-60028

4 Artillery Passage 240 TOW-L-60015 1 & 3 Fourier Street 224 TOW-L-60029

5 Artillery Passage 239 TOW-L-60016 4 - 7 Puma Court 223 TOW-L-60030

41 Artillery Lane 238 TOW-L-60017 11a & 15 Wilkes Street 219 TOW-L-60031

6 & 7 Artillery Passage 237 TOW-L-60018 17 & 25 Wilkes Street 220 TOW-L-60032

8 Artillery Passage 236 TOW-L-60019 6 Wilkes Street 218 TOW-L-60033

10 Wilkes Street 216 TOW-L-60034 Church of St Dunstan and All Saints, Stepney High St. 192 TOW-L-70017

16 Wilkes Street 215 TOW-L-60035 Mercer's Almhouses, Whitehorse Road 191 TOW-L-70018

2 & 4 Princelet Street 214 TOW-L-60036 34 Belgrave Street 190 TOW-L-70019

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 155


3 & 5 Princelet Street 213 TOW-L-60037 36-40 Belgrave Street 190 TOW-L-70020

9 Princelet Street 212 TOW-L-60038 50-52 Belgrave Street 189 TOW-L-70021

13 Princelet Street 211 TOW-L-60039 19 - 31 Barnes Street, West side 187 TOW-L-70023

11 Princelet Street 211a TOW-L-60040 12 - 22 Barnes Street, E14 186 TOW-L-70024

24 & 26 Hanbury Street 210 TOW-L-60041 1-8 York Square 184 TOW-L-70025

15 Princelet Street 209 TOW-L-60042 9-16 York Square 183 TOW-L-70026

17 Princelet Street 209a TOW-L-60043 1 & 1A Flamborough St. E1 182 TOW-L-70027

19 Princelet Street 208 TOW-L-60044 3-7 Flamborough Street 181 TOW-L-70028

21 Princelet Street 208a TOW-L-60045 1-2 Flamborough walk 181a TOW-L-70029

23 Princelet Street 208b TOW-L-60046 3-4 Flamborough walk 181c TOW-L-70030

25 Princelet Street 208c TOW-L-60047 5-6 Flamborough walk 181d TOW-L-70031

34 - 38 Hanbury Street 207 TOW-L-60048 8 Flamborough Street 180 TOW-L-70032

114-122 Brick Lane 207a TOW-L-60049 16-21 Flamborough Street 178 TOW-L-70034

35 Buxton Street 202 TOW-L-60050 22-24 Flamborough Street 178a TOW-L-70035

56 Artillary Lane 230a TOW-L-60074 261-263 Whitechapel Rd 200a TOW-L-70036

214a -
12-16 & 20-22 Princelet Street TOW-L-60075 265-267 Whitechapel Rd 200b TOW-L-70037
214f

333-335 Whitechapel Rd 200 TOW-L-70001 Baptist Chapel Walls, Stepney Green 192a TOW-L-70038

Bust of William Booth, Mile End Road, North side 198 TOW-L-70002 Stepney Meeting House Congregational Church Hall Ruins 192b TOW-L-70039

175-
Trinity Green, Mile End Road 197 TOW-L-70003 604-608 Commercial Road TOW-L-80001
177

29 Mile End Road 197B TOW-L-70004 683-691 Commercial Road 177A TOW-L-80004

Bust of Edward VII, outside 39 Mile End Rd 196 TOW-L-70005 699-711 Commercial Road 177B TOW-L-80005

82- 84 Mile End Road 194 TOW-L-70006 Commercial Road Bridge 174 TOW-L-80006

90 Mile End Road 193 TOW-L-70007 Commercial Road Viaduct 173 TOW-L-80007

92 Mile End Road 193 TOW-L-70008 Mill Place, (West side) 172 TOW-L-80008

94 Mile End Road 193 TOW-L-70009 Library on Commercial Road 171 TOW-L-80009

96 Mile End Road 193 TOW-L-70010 80 Three Colt Street 170 TOW-L-80010

98-100 Mile End Road 193 TOW-L-70011 Cannon Workshop, 3-5 Cannon Drive 168 TOW-L-80011

102 Mile End Road 193 TOW-L-70012 Cannon Workshop, 92-116 Cannon Drive 167 TOW-L-80012

104 Mile End Road 193 TOW-L-70013 Cannon Workshop, 135-167 Cannon Drive 167a TOW-L-80013

106 Mile End Road 193 TOW-L-70014 Poplar Dock 164 TOW-L-90001

108 Mile End Road 193 TOW-L-70015 Accumulator Tower, Preston's Road 163 TOW-L-90002

110 Mile End Road 193 TOW-L-70016 2-22 Fairfield Road, E3 1103 TOW-L-90008

163 Bow Road, E3 1104 TOW-L-90009

116 Bow Road, E3 1100 TOW-L-90010

110 Bow Road, E3 1101 TOW-L-90011

DrapersAlmshouses, Railway Way 1102 TOW-L-90012

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 156


Import Dock 166 TOW-L-90013

35-49 Arnold Road 1134 TOW-L-90014

Newham

North Woolwich Station, Pier Road 1442 NEW-L-90003

Greenwich

Royal Brass Foundry 1444 GRE-L-90004

Main Guard Room 1446 GRE-L-90005

Verbruggen's House 1447 GRE-L-90006

Officer's Quarters 1448 GRE-L-90007

ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES 157


ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES
75 COWCROSS STREET
LONDON EC1M 6EL

S-ar putea să vă placă și