Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
IN BUSINESS
INTRODUCTION
Standard costing is an accounting technique that some manufacturers use to
identify the differences or variances between
2) the costs that should have occurred for those goods. The costs that should
have occurred for the actual good output are known as standard costs.
If the company had incurred more than the standard costs for the direct
materials, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead, the company will not
meet its projected net income. In other words, the variances will direct
management's attention to the production inefficiencies or higher input costs.
In turn, management can take action to correct the problems or seek higher
selling prices.
Since the external financial statements must reflect the historical cost
principle, the standard costs in the inventories and the cost of goods sold will
need to be adjusted for the variances. Since most of the goods manufactured
will have been sold, most of the variances will be reported on the income
statement as part of the cost of goods sold.
Page 1
Objectives of Standard Costing
The objectives of Standard Costing for which it is implemented are:
(c) It supplies the ways to utilise properly material, labour and also overhead
which will be economic in character.
(e) It also helps the management to supply necessary data relating to cost
element to submit quotations or to fix up the selling price of a firm.
(f) It also helps the management to make proper valuations of inventory (viz.,
Work-in- progress, and finished products).
(h) It also helps the management to take various corrective decisions viz.,
fixation of price, make-or-buy decisions etc. which will be more beneficial to
the firm.
Page 2
Types of standards
Following are different type of standards:
Basic standards
Normal standards
Current standards
Attainable (expected) standards
1) Basic standards
These are standards established considering those factors that are basic in
nature and remain unchanged over a long period of time and are altered only
when the business operations change significantly affecting the very basic
foundations of the entity and nature of busienss. These standards help
compare business operations over a longer period of time. Basic standards are
used not only to evaluate actual results but also current expected results
(current standards). We can say that basic standards work as a standard for
other standards. As basic standards are not updated according to latest
circumstances thus they are not used often as they cannot help in short term
period variance analysis.
2) Normal Standards:
These are such standards which are expected if normal circumstances prevail.
Term normal represents the normal conditions of the business in the absence
of any unexpected fluctuations (either favourable or unfavourable). Even
through normal standards are more of a theoretical in nature as reality cannot
be sufficiently predicted with all its fluctuations in advance. Also,
circumstances may change in such a way that factors which were expected to
be controllable are not so controllable by the mangers. Thus it has limited
application in today’s business environment. However, normal standards acts
as a good yardstick that represents challenging yet attainable results and can
be used by management in such environment which is simple in nature and is
not prone to great fluctuations.
Page 3
3) Current standards
Page 4
Advantages of Standard Costing
The following advantages may be derived from Standard Costing:
(ii) More effective cost control is possible under standard costing if the same is
reviewed and analysed at regular intervals for improvements and immediate
action can be taken if deviations from standards are found out which,
ultimately, leads to cost reduction.
(iii) Analysis of variance and its measurement helps to detect inefficiencies and
mistakes which enable the management to investigate the reasons.
(iv) Since standard costs are predetermined costs they are very useful for
planning and budgeting. It also helps to estimate the effect of changes in Cost-
Price-Volume relationship which also helps the management for decision-
making in future.
(v) As standard is fixed for each product, its components, materials, process
operation etc. it improves the overall production efficiency which also
ultimately reduces cost and thereby increases profit.
(vi) Once the Standard Costing System is implemented it will lead to saving cost
since most of the costing work can be eliminated.
(viii) This system also helps to prepare Profit and Loss Account promptly for
short period in order to know the trend of the business which helps the
management to take decisions promptly.
(ix) Standard costing also is used for inventory valuation purposes. Stock can
be valued at standard cost which can reduce the fluctuation of profit for
different methods of valuation for the same.
Page 5
(x) Efficiency of labour is promoted.
(ii) The executives are liable for those variances that are found from actions
which are actually controllable by them. Thus, in order to fix up the
responsibilities, it becomes necessary to segregate variances into non-
controllable and controllable portions although that is not an easy task.
(iii) Standards are always changing since conditions of the business are equally
changing. So, standards are to be revised in order to make them comparable
with actual results. But revision of standards creates many problems,
particularly in inventory adjustment.
(iv) Standards are either too liberal or rigid since the same are based on
average past results, attainable good performance or theoretical maximum
efficiency. So, if the standards are very high, it will adversely affect the morale
and motivation of the employees.
Page 6
Material Variance
MATERIAL COST VARIANCE
The difference between the standard cost of direct materials specified for
production and the actual cost of direct materials used in production is known
as Direct Material Cost Variance. Material Cost Variance gives an idea of how
much more or less cost has been incurred when compared with the standard
cost. Thus, Variance Analysis is an important tool to keep a tab on the
deviations from the standard set by a company.
Material Cost Variance can be due to less purchase price being paid than the
standard or because of change in the quantity of material used. Thus, Material
Cost Variance is made up of two components namely; Material Price Variance
and Material Usage Variance.
Page 7
Let us understand this formula with the help of an example.
Standard Actual
Price 10 per kg 8 per kg
Qty 200 kgs 150 kgs
Page 8
Conclusion
Material Cost Variance is composed of Material Price Variance and Material
Usage Variance. This means Material Cost Variance = Material Price Variance +
Material Usage Variance. We can confirm and cross check this equation with
the help of our example.
Favourable, since the actual cost is less than the standard cost. If the actual
cost is more than the standard cost, the result is Adverse (A).
The materials usage or quantity variance can be separated into mix variance
and yield variance.
Page 9
Materials mix variance is that portion of the materials quantity variance which
is due to the difference between the actual composition of a mixture and the
standard mixture
Material mix variance = (Standard cost of actual quantity of the actual mixture
– Standard cost of actual quantity of the standard mixture)
Or
Materials mix variance = (Actual mix – Revised standard mix of actual input) x
Standard price
Materials yield variance explains the remaining portion of the total materials
quantity variance. It is that portion of materials usage variance which is due to
the difference between the actual yield obtained and standard yield specified
(in terms of actual inputs). In other words, yield variance occurs when the
output of the final product does not correspond with the output that could
have been obtained by using the actual inputs. In some industries like sugar,
chemicals, steel, etc. actual yield may differ from expected yield based on
actual input resulting into yield variance.
The total of materials mix variance and materials yield variance equals
materials quantity or usage variance. When there is no materials mix variance,
the materials yield variance equals the total materials quantity variance.
Accordingly, mix and yield variances explain distinct parts of the total materials
usage variance and are additive.
Page 10
Labour Variances
Direct labour variances arise when actual labour costs are different from
standard labour costs. In analysis of labour costs, the emphasis is on labour
rates and labour hours.
Labour cost variance denotes the difference between the actual direct wages
paid and the standard direct wages specified for the output achieved.
This variance is calculated by using the following formula:
Labour cost variance = (AH x AR) – (SH x SR)
Where:
AH = Actual hours
AR = Actual rate
SH = Standard hours
SR = Standard rate
The calculation of labour efficiency or usage variance follows the same pattern
as the computation of materials usage variance. Labour efficiency variance
occurs when labour operations are more efficient or less efficient than
standard performance. If actual direct labour hours required to complete a job
differ from the number of standard hours specified, a labour efficiency
variance results; it is the difference between actual hours expended and
standard labour hours specified multiplied by the standard labour rate per
hour.
Page 11
Labour efficiency variance is computed by applying the following formula:
Labour efficiency variance = (Actual hours – Standard hours for the actual
output) x Std. rate per hour.
Labour mix variance = (Actual labour mix – Revised standard labour mix in
terms of actual total hours) x Standard rate per hour
To take an example, suppose the following were the standard labour cost data
per unit in a factory:
Page 12
In a period, many class B workers were absent and it was necessary to
substitute class B workers. Since the class A workers were less experienced
with the job, more labour hours were used.
The final product cost contains not only material cost but also labour cost.
Therefore, gain or loss (higher or lower output than the standard output)
should take into account labour yield variance also. A lower output simply
means that final output does not correspond with the production units that
should have been produced from the hours expended on the inputs.
It can be computed by ap-plying the following formula:
Labour yield variance = (Actual output – Standard output based on actual
hours) x Av. Std. Labour Rate per unit of output.
Or Labour yield variance = (Actual loss – Standard loss on actual hours) x
Average standard labour rate per unit of output
Labour yield variance is also known as labour efficiency sub-variance which is
computed in terms of inputs, i.e., standard labour hours and revised labour
hours mix (in terms of actual hours).
Labour efficiency sub-variance is computed by using the following formula:
Page 13
Labour efficiency sub-variance = (Revised standard mix – standard mix) x
Standard rate
Page 14
Overhead Variances
The analysis of factory overhead variances is more complex than variance
analysis for direct materials and direct labour. There is no standardisation of
the terms or methods used for calculating overhead variances. For this reason,
it is necessary to be familiar with the different approaches which can be
applied in overhead variances.
This overall overhead variance is the difference between the actual overhead
cost incurred and the standard cost of overhead for the output achieved.
(Actual overhead incurred) – (Standard hours for the actual output x Standard
overhead rate per hour)
Or
(Actual overhead incurred) – (Actual output x Standard overhead rate per unit)
Page 15
It is the difference between actual variable overhead cost and standard
variable overhead allowed for the actual output achieved.
This variance indicates the difference between the actual fixed overhead cost
and standard fixed overhead cost allowed for the actual output.
This variance is found by using the following formula:
Or (Actual fixed overhead cost) – (Std. hours for actual output x Std. fixed
overhead rate per hour)
This variance indicates the difference between actual variable overhead and
budgeted variable overhead based on actual hours worked.
Page 16
(5) Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance:
This variance is like labour efficiency variance and arises when actual hours
worked differ from standard hours required for good units produced. The
actual quantity produced and standard quantity fixed might be different
because of higher or lower efficiency of workers employed in the
manufacturing of goods.
This variance indicates the difference between actual fixed overhead and
budgeted fixed overhead.
If actual fixed overhead costs are greater than budgeted fixed costs, an
unfavourable variance results because actual costs exceed the budget. Actual
overhead costs seldom equal budgeted costs because property tax rates may
change, insurance premiums may increase or equipment changes may affect
depreciation rates. As an illustration, assume that a company completed
36,000 units (equal to 18,000 standard production hours) in 18,500 hours at
the recorded fixed cost of Rs 7,51,000. The standard fixed cost rate per hour is
Rs 40. Therefore,
Page 17
(7) Fixed Overhead Volume Variance:
Volume variance relates to only fixed overhead. This variance arises due to the
difference between the standard fixed overhead cost allowed (absorbed) for
the actual output and the budgeted fixed overhead based on standard hours
allowed for actual output achieved during the period. The variance shows the
over-or-under-absorption of fixed overheads dur-ing a particular period. If the
actual output is more than the standard output, there is over-absorption and
variance is favourable. If actual output is less than the standard output, the
volume variance is unfavourable.
Or
(Actual production – Budgeted production) x Std. fixed overhead rate per unit
If actual working days is more than the budgeted working days, the variance is
favourable as work has been done on days more than budgeted or allowed and
vice-versa.
(No. of actual working days – No. of budgeted working days) x Std. fixed
overhead rate per day. Calendar variance can be computed based on hours or
output.
Page 18
Then the formulae are:
Hours Basis:
If revised budgeted capacity hours are more than the budgeted hours, the
variance will be favourable. In the reverse situation, the variance will be
unfavourable.
Output Basis:
If revised budgeted quantity is more than the budgeted quantity; the variance
is favourable; if revised budgeted quantity is less, the variance will be
unfavourable.
Fixed Overhead Efficiency Variance = (Actual hours – Standard hours for actual
production) x Fixed overhead rate per hour
Page 19
(10) Fixed Overhead Capacity Variance:
It is that part of fixed overhead volume variance which is due to the difference
between the actual capacity (in hours) worked during a given period and the
budgeted capacity (expressed in hours). The formula is
This variance represents idle time also. If actual capacity hours are more than
the budgeted capacity hours, the variance is favourable and if actual capacity
hours are less than the budgeted capacity hours the variance will be
unfavourable.
In case actual number of days and budgeted number of days are also given,
then budgeted capacity hours will be calculated in terms of actual number of
days and it will be known as revised budgeted capacity hours, i.e., budgeted
hours in actual days worked.
In this situation, the formula for calculating capacity variance will be as follows:
In the above formula, the variance will be favourable if actual capacity hours
are more than the revised budgeted hours. However, if actual capacity hours
are lesser than the revised budgeted hours, the variance will be adverse as
lesser hours means that lesser actual hours have been worked taking the
actual days utilised into account.
Page 20
Use of Standard costing in business
Standard Costing has long been used in manufacturing and some distribution
environments as a control for measuring variations from expected results.
Everyone has expected results of some kind...purchase price of materials,
amount of labor required for assembly, amount it will cost for outside
processing, etc. So shouldn't everyone use Standard Cost?
Make to order businesses rarely produce something in the same manner, since
each job differs based on the customer's quote. In this case, it is important to
understand the actual cost of a job once completed (or during the process) as
compared to how the job was quoted. Usually not a lot can be done about the
actual cost incurred, but a lot should be learned about improving the quoting
process from the comparison of actual cost versus quoted cost.
Page 21