Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
QUALITY SYSTEMS
Copyright MAIN ROADS Western Australia
Specification 201 Quality – 04/10092 Issued 14/04/2016
REVISION REGISTER
Clause Description of Revision Authorised Issued
Number By Date
201.14-201.16 Renumbering of Clauses MPS 14/04/2016
Whole Reformatted to corporate branding MPS 13/04/2016
Document guidelines and numerous typographical
and grammatical corrections
201.01.3, Deleted references to HB90.3 (not
201.02.1 & applicable with new ISO 9001)
Annexure
201C Cl. 2.0
201.02.1 Updated and corrected titles of various
reference documents
201.03.2, Changes made to reflect new ISO 9001
201.06 - 07, including titles and structure
201.11 - 15
201.12.4, Document names and references to
201.12.10 & Main Roads website updated
201.12.11
201.16 Added requirement for monthly reporting
Annexure Title changed
201A
Annexure Reference to ISO 9001 updated
201A Cl 1.0
Annexure Added clarification for where to take core
201A samples
Cl. 1.1.2
Table 201A-1 Corrected name of bridge works
component
Annexure Deleted redundant titles for subgrade
201A construction
Annexure Added testing frequency for bitumen
201A produced by blending
Annexure Re-numbered last item as j)
201C Cl 1.1
Annexure Changed Dual Use Path to Shared Path MPS 30/09/2015
201A
Annexure Testing frequency for geotextile fabric MPS 20/08/2015
201A amended
201.02 Update to title of AS/NZS 2891.10
Annexure Correction of day’s production to
REVISION REGISTER
Clause Description of Revision Authorised Issued
Number By Date
201A production shift
Cl. 1.1.2
201.02 Added binder drain off test MPS 13/04/2015
Annexure Testing frequency for PMB segregation
201A amended
Annexure Corrections to requirements for crushed
201A aggregates
Annexure Asphalt manufacture – reformatting and
201A new testing frequency linked to
Specifications 502, 504 and 510. Added
Binder Drain Off test
Annexure Deleted testing for cold mix
201A
Annexure Underlying Viscosity of PMB replaced by MPS 22/05/2014
201A Consistency 6% test
Annexure Methods for water absorption of sealing
201A and asphalt aggregates corrected
201.02 Three test methods added for gyratory MPS 26/02/2014
compaction, stripping potential and
moisture content of asphalt
Annexure Inclusion of S45R binder
201A
Annexure Clarification of sampling of asphalt cores
201A
Cl. 1.1.2
Annexure Formulas for minimum and maximum
201A characteristic values of in-situ air void
Cl. 1.2.2 content of asphalt
Annexure Requirement for testing for stripping
201A potential of asphalt
Annexure Option of testing moisture content of
201A asphalt by NSW method
CONTENTS
Clause Page No
GENERAL .................................................................................................................... 6
201.01 Scope ......................................................................................................... 6
201.02 References ................................................................................................. 6
201.03 Definitions – Quality Plan .......................................................................... 10
201.04 – 201.05 NOT USED .................................................................................... 10
2. This Quality Specification sets out the Principal’s minimum Quality Plan
requirements for establishing, implementing and managing a Quality
Plan for the work under the Contract.
201.02 REFERENCES
Australian Standards
3. The Quality Plan shall include the scope of works detailed in Scope of
the Specification 100 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS for the Contract. Works
The Quality Plan must also address the requirements detailed in
AS 2124 and the Special Conditions of Contract.
5. The Quality Plan shall clearly address the requirements The Contract
specified in Specification 201 QUALITY SYSTEMS and shall
demonstrate compliance with the Contract.
7. If not submitted and explicitly approved in writing during the Hold Point
Tendering process, the Contractor shall submit a suitable fully
documented Quality Plan to the Superintendent for approval prior to
commencement of work under the Contract.
1. The Contractor shall document in the Quality Plan all test All Equipment
devices required to provide evidence of conformity. Where monitoring or
measurement of a product or process is required in order to demonstrate
conformity of the finished product with the Contract, the Contractor shall
ensure the requirements of AS/NZS ISO 9001 Monitoring and Measuring
Resources for the works are documented and met.
4. The NDM shall have current density calibrations for the DT Modes
50 mm, 65 mm, 100 mm, 150 mm, 200 mm and 300 mm direct
transmission (DT) modes. The NDM shall be compatible with the normal
operating procedures and test methods of Main Roads Western
Australia.
7. The direct transmission mode (depth of probe) to be used for In-situ Density
each in-situ density test undertaken shall be stated in the appropriate Test
Inspection Plans(s) [Inspection and Test Plan(s)].
1. The principles used to define the limits of any Lot for the Definition of a
Contract shall be: Lot
a) the maximum size of a Lot is limited to the quantity of work
that is the subject of a single conformance decision;
2. In the case of selecting a Lot for the purpose of judging the Lots for In-
conformance of the insitu density, particular attention shall be paid to situ Density
establishing the uniformity of density in a direction transverse to the road Products
alignment. Boundaries of Lots shall be chosen so as to ensure vertical,
transverse and longitudinal homogeneity.
3. The extent of each Lot shall be clearly identified in the field Production
prior to the commencement of any product realisation activity. The Lot
Contractor shall establish, and describe in the Quality Plan, a unique Lot
identification system, for identification and traceability of the product,
compliant with AS/NZS ISO 9001. The Lot shall be demarcated on Site
with markers until the Lot has been brought to completion. As a
minimum the markers shall detail the chainage and Lot identification
clearly legible from the alignment centre line.
4. All Lots defined for the purpose of conformance testing that Testing Lot
form only a part of a Production Lot shall be identified with markers as
detailed for a Production Lot. The identification of the Testing Lot to be
maintained until the Superintendent releases the HOLD POINT
associated with the certification that the Testing Lot conforms to the
requirements of the Specification.
6. No work shall proceed for any Lot until field identification has Field
been established for the extent of that Lot. Identification
2. The Quality Plan shall define the type and extent of control Control
exercised over those Subcontractors employed for the Contract in exercised
accordance with AS/NZS ISO 9001.
3. The Quality Plan shall address the control of subcontracts for Critical
the critical processes defined in Annexure 201E when any such work, Subcontracts
product or service is subcontracted.
1. The Quality Plan shall detail the documented procedure for Document
the Control of Documents required by the Contract in accordance with and Data
AS/NZS ISO 9001. Control
3. The State Records Act 2000 requires Main Roads and its Legislative
Contractors to provide for the keeping of State Records related to Requirement
contracts.
6. The Contractor shall ensure as a minimum, but not limited to that Records
the following records are kept and forwarded to the Superintendent: Required
- audit reports;
- conformance reports;
8. The Contractor shall prepare a test report for all tests Test Reports
undertaken even when the result of the test will not be used for
compliance measurement. The Contractor shall deliver all test reports
for each Lot to the Superintendent within 24 hours of completing the test
procedure or carrying out a compliance measurement.
12. Within four (4) weeks from the Date of Practical Completion, Records at
the Contractor shall forward all records to the Superintendent. Practical
Completion
1. The Quality Plan shall detail the procedures that address the Non -
Control of Non-Conforming Output(s) in accordance with Conformance
AS/NZS ISO 9001.
201.14 IMPROVEMENT
1. The Quality Plan shall detail the procedures for addressing Improvement
corrective and preventative actions for the Improvement of the Quality
Plan in accordance with AS/NZS ISO 9001.
1. Within 5 days of the end of each month the Contractor shall Monthly
submit to the Superintendent a completed Monthly Quality Performance Reporting
report using the form available on Main Roads’ website, internet
address: http://www.mainroads.wa.gov.au - under: Building
Roads/Contracting to Main Roads/Contractor Reporting Forms.
The Contractor shall use this form or any updated version as advised by
the Superintendent for all quality reporting required under the Contract.
HOLD POINTS
201.21 HOLD POINTS
3. To obtain release of the Hold Point for a Lot, the Contractor Hold Point
shall comply with the following requirements: Release for a
Lot
a) The Contractor shall have completed all conformance
inspection reports for any underlying Lot(s) or any adjacent
Lot(s) affected by the Lot in question.
ANNEXURE 201A
TESTING REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with the requirements of the Contract for monitoring and measurement,
testing procedures and minimum testing frequencies shall conform to the following
details:
1.0 GENERAL
This Annexure sets out the minimum sampling and testing requirements for the
acceptance of various works to be carried out under the Contract. Additional sampling,
testing and acceptance requirements may be detailed elsewhere in the Specification or
in referenced Standards. Where no minimum sampling and testing requirements are
specified the Contractor shall be able to demonstrate conformance of the work in
accordance with Clause 9.1 of AS/NZS ISO 9001.
Included in the test methods shown in the following sections are requirements for test
authorities to be NATA accredited for the following applicable sampling and sample
preparation methods: WA 0.1, 100.1, 105.1, 200.1, 701.1, 705.1 and AS 1012 part 1.
The Contractor shall be responsible for patching holes made as a result of sampling and
testing.
The sample and test holes shall be backfilled immediately after sampling or testing by
the persons responsible for carrying out the sampling and testing. Backfilled material
shall have similar properties and shall be compacted at or near optimum moisture
content to densities matching the surrounding material.
The Contractor's conformance decision shall apply to the whole of the Lot or part of the
Work subject to test.
For the Works in general, density shall be measured in-situ by use of a nuclear
moisture/density meter in accordance with WA 324.2. All measurements shall be made
using the direct transmission mode.
If the in-situ density is outside the range of densities 1.5-3.05 t/m³ for which the nuclear
moisture/density meter can be calibrated then WA 324.1 shall be used.
For the purpose of measuring conformance of all work under the Contract, the in-situ
density shall be expressed as a percentage of the maximum dry density. This
percentage shall be calculated in accordance with WA 134.1.
The maximum dry density shall be determined by WA 133.1 or WA 133.2. Where the
pavement material is stabilised or modified with Portland Cement, the maximum dry
density determinations shall be commenced two (2) hours after mixing is complete and
shall be completed within a further two (2) hours. If Low Heat (LH) Cement or Lime is
used for the stabilisation or modification, these determinations shall be commenced
three (3) hours after mixing is complete and shall be completed within a further three (3)
hours.
Density and in-situ air voids shall be determined on the basis of the results of tests of
core samples of asphalt sampled from the pavement in a stratified random manner, after
laying and compaction, in accordance with WA 701.1. Core samples shall not be taken
from asphalt placed on a bridge deck or other concrete structure. Core samples shall be
taken from asphalt placed over a geotextile reinforced seal.
The Moisture content shall be determined using WA 110.1. If it is not practicable to use
this method, then WA 110.2 or WA 324.2 may be used. However, correlation must be
established with WA 110.1 before proceeding with the subsidiary methods WA 110.2
and WA 324.2.
The conformance of every Lot of the work under the Contract with respect to density
shall be determined by comparing the Characteristic Dry Density Ratio of the Lot (or the
Characteristic Percent Marshall Density of the Lot for asphalt) and the limits specified in
the Specification.
The dry density ratio (or the Marshall density) shall be determined at the number of
locations per Lot defined in Table 201A-1. The locations shall be selected in
accordance with WA 0.1.
The Characteristic Dry Density Ratio (or the Characteristic Percent Marshall Density),
Rc, of a Lot shall be calculated thus:
Rc = R - ks
where; R is the mean of the results of dry density ratio tests (or the mean of the
results of the percentage of Marshall Density tests) on the Lot being
assessed, reported to the nearest 0.1 percent
s is the standard deviation of the results of dry density ratio tests (or the
standard deviation of the results of the percentage of Marshall Density
tests) on the Lot being assessed, calculated in accordance with Clause 1.4
and reported to the nearest 0.1 percent.
Unless otherwise noted, the multiplier ‘k’ shall be based on the major component of the
project i.e. freeway, highway, etc.
The conformance of every Lot of the work under the Contract with respect to in-situ air
void content shall be determined by comparing the Characteristic In-situ Air Void content
Document No: Dxx#xxxxx Page 21 of 59
of the Lot and the limits specified in the Specification. The number of core samples per
Lot is defined in Table 201A-1. The location of the core samples shall be selected in
accordance with WA 0.1. The Characteristic In-situ Void Content of a Lot shall be
calculated to the nearest 0.1 percent using the following formulae:
Minimum characteristic value = R - ks
Maximum characteristic value = R + ks
Where: R is the mean of the results of the percentage air void content on the Lot
being assessed, reported to the nearest 0.1 percent.
k is the multiplier as detailed in Table 201A-1.
s is the standard deviation of the results of air-void content on the Lot being
assessed, calculated in accordance with Clause 1.4 and reported to the
nearest 0.1 percent.
The conformance of any Lot with respect to insitu moisture shall be determined by
comparing the Dryback Characteristic Moisture Content or Construction Characteristic
Moisture Content of the Lot and the limits specified in the Specification.
The moisture contents shall be determined at the number of test locations per Lot
defined in Table 201A-2. The test locations shall be selected in accordance with
WA 0.1.
CMc = m + ks
where: m is the mean of the results of in-situ moisture content tests on the Lot
being assessed, reported to the nearest 0.01 percent.
The Dryback Characteristic Moisture Content (DMc) of a Lot shall be calculated thus:
DMUpper = m1 + ks1 and
DMLower = m2 + ks2
where: m1 is the average of the sample moisture contents on the Lot being
assessed, taken from the upper half of the Basecourse layer and
determined in accordance with WA 110.1 reported to the nearest
0.01 percent.
x i x 2
S1 i 1
n 1
where: xi is an individual result.
x i x 2
S2 i 1
n 1
where: xi is an individual result.
The Dryback Characteristic Moisture Content (DMc) of a Lot shall be calculated thus:
DMc = m + ks
Document No: Dxx#xxxxx Page 23 of 59
where: m average of the sample moisture contents on the Lot being assessed,
taken from the pavement layer and determined in accordance with
WA 110.1, reported to the nearest 0.01 percent.
Where specified the standard deviation ( S ) of the distribution of the values of a property
shall be calculated as:
x i x 2
S i 1
n 1
where: xi is an individual result.
Where the Superintendent's Audit testing indicates that a Lot is non-conforming and
such status is disputed by the Contractor, the following course of action shall be taken:
a) Where acceptance of a Lot is by statistical analyses for a quality verification
requirement listed in Table 201A-3, the results of the Superintendent’s Audit
Tests and Contractor's Tests shall be combined to determine acceptance or
otherwise of the Lot provided the following conditions are satisfied:
(i) The ratio of the greatest variance (standard deviation squared) to the
least variance of the two sets of results does not exceed the F value in
Table 201A-3.
(ii) The differences between the means of the two sets of results divided by
the standard error of difference (Sw) does not exceed the t value in
Table 201A-3. The standard error of difference shall be calculated using
the formula:
2 s12 s 22
Sw
N
where: sw is the standard error of difference
N is the total number of results which must be contributed to equally by the audit
and Contractor’s testing.
The combined test results shall be used to calculate the required parameter in
accordance with the Specifications but using the ‘k’ multiplier in Table 201A-3.
b) Where the conditions (a)(i) or (a)(ii) are not satisfied or when acceptance of a
Lot or item is not by statistical analysis for a quality verification requirement
listed in Table 201A-3, the Contractor and Superintendent shall carry out
additional joint testing to determine the acceptance or otherwise of the work.
The joint testing shall be carried out in accordance with the following
requirements:
(i) Joint testing shall be carried out using the Contractor's Laboratory and
Testing Equipment.
(ii) Before the joint testing commences the Contractor’s nuclear
moisture/density meter shall be calibrated at Main Roads Materials
Engineering Branch and that calibration shall be used for the joint
testing and for subsequent testing.
(iii) Testing personnel from both parties shall be present during all phases of
sampling and testing.
(iv) The execution of all testing tasks shall be divided approximately equally
between both parties.
(v) Both parties shall have the right to repeat any non-destructive
measurements.
(vi) Calculations shall be to the satisfaction of both parties.
(vii) The application of joint test results shall be in accordance with the
Contract Specification and the results shall be accepted by both parties
as correct and final.
(viii) The costs of the calibration of the nuclear moisture/density meter and
the joint testing shall be assigned as follows:
- If the additional testing performed as above shows the Lot or item of
work to be conforming, the cost of such testing shall be borne by the
Principal.
c) At any time and upon the request of either party, the Superintendent and
Contractor shall carry out an evaluation of their respective testing methods to
determine the reason for any continuing discrepancies and arrive at a uniform
testing technique.
Additional crushed rock base properties Each trial mix in accordance with
requirements for 7 day Unconfined Compressive Strength Specification 501
HCTCRB Trial Mixes (WA 143.2)
28 day Unconfined Compressive
Strength (WA 143.2)
Repeated Load Triaxial Test using
internal displacement measuring device
(AG:PT/T053)
2.2 BITUMINOUS SURFACING
Bitumen Emulsion Tests as specified in AS 1160 and
Manufacture Specification 511
Bitumen Emulsion Residue from evaporation (AS 1160) 1 per delivery tanker
Delivery to Site
Bitumen Produced Tests in accordance with Specification 511
in Western Australia Viscosity at 60°C 1 test for each production batch for
– Distillation of each binder class
Viscosity at 135°C
Crude Oil
Penetration at 25°C
Viscosity of Residue at 60°C after RTFO
test
Penetration at 25°C
Viscosity of Residue at 60°C after RTFO
test
Ductility at 15°C after RTFO test
Matter Insoluble in Toluene 1 test for each 4th cargo load for
each binder class
Stiffness
Consistency 6% at 60°C
Polymer Modified All Other Binder Classes 1 test for each binder Class every 3
Binder (continued) Consistency at 60°C months
Stiffness
Elastic recovery at 60°C (S25E and S45R
only)
Consistency 6% at 60°C
Compression Limit at 70°C (S45R only)
Reclaimed Asphalt Tested in accordance with Specification 511 3 samples for every 1,000 tonne of
Pavement (RAP) RAP
Source Rock Weathering AS 1726 Table A9 One test per designated source
Polished Aggregate Friction Value area or one test per year
(AS 1141.40/42)
Crushed Aggregate PSD (WA 210.1) 3 tests per quarry production Lot
for Sprayed Sealing Flakiness Index (WA 216.1) 3 tests per quarry production Lot
(Quarry Testing) LA Abrasion (WA 220.1) 1 test per 6 months
Water Absorption (AS 1141.6.1) 1 test per 6 months
Degradation Factor (AS 1141.25.2) 1 test per 12 months
Wet Strength and Wet/Dry Strength 1 test per 6 months
Variation (AS 1141.22)
Petrographic Examination 1 test per 12 months per material
type
Secondary Mineral Content (AS 1141.26) 1 test per 12 months
Resistance to Stripping (AS 1141.50) 1 test per 6 months
Crushed Aggregate ALD (AS 1141.20.1) Minimum 3 tests per dump site per
for Sprayed Sealing aggregate size
(On-site Testing) Moisture Content (WA 212.1 or 212.2) 1 per aggregate size per delivered
lot and after inclement weather
Sand Primerseal PSD (WA 210.1) 3 tests per production Lot or day
Cover Material
Laterite Aggregate PSD (WA 210.1) 3 per Lot
for Asphalt Crushing Test Value (WA 223.1) 3 per Lot
PAFV (AS 1141.40/42) 1 per contract per material type
Asphalt Full test or partial test in accordance with Specification 502, 504 or 510.
Manufacture The minimum specified number of full tests shall be undertaken before
(routine testing) commencing any partial tests. A full test can be done in lieu of a partial
test.
Asphalt plant production per
shift per mix type and size
Depth Every 10 m
Microsurfacing Particle Size Distribution (WA 730.1 and 1 test per lot where a Lot is 100 m3
Production and WA 210.1) or one days production which ever
Laying is lesser
Binder Content (WA 730.1 or 1 test per lot where a Lot is 100 m3
AS 2891.3.1) or one days production which ever
is lesser
Finished Layer Shape (WA 313.2) 5 tests per lot where a Lot is
100 m3 or one days production
which ever is lesser
Texture Depth (WA 311.1) Wearing 4 Tests per lot where a Lot is
Course 100 m3 or one days production
which ever is lesser
2.3 DRAINAGE
Drains and Channels Geometrics 1 cross section per 50 m
Corrugated Metal On completion of installation the Contractor shall measure the internal
Pipe (continued) diameter of the culvert at the pre-marked locations using a calibrated steel
measuring tape or other suitable measuring device as approved by the
Superintendent. The following information shall be recorded and reported:
a) Full details of the culvert tested including date of test and when backfill
was completed.
b) The pre- and post-installation diametric measurements.
c) Calculated installed deflections.
d) Whether each culvert tested was acceptable.
Concrete Trial Mixes (AS 1012 part 3): Each trial mix in accordance with
Consistency (Slump Test) Specification 820
Strength
Limestone Blocks Refer Clause 903.22 of Specification 903 1 per 200 blocks
Anti-Graffiti Coating Dry Film Thickness (ASTM D 6132) 1 per every m2 for each surface
Systems / panel painted
Paintwork Dry Film Thickness (AS/NZS 1580) 1 per surface less than 1 m2
Adhesion 1 per every 25 m2 for each coating
system layer
2.6 ELECTRICAL
Light Pole Concrete Footings (AS 1012 part 3, 8, 9) 3 specimens per 25 m3 or part
Foundations thereof
Footing Dimensions Each installation
ANNEXURE 201B
IDENTIFICATION AND TRACEABILITY
In accordance with the requirements of the Contract for product identification and
traceability, Traceability shall apply to:
1. The boundaries of each Lot of asphalt placed shall be recorded using Main Roads
chainages and SLK’s.
2. The location of asphalt represented by each grading and Marshall property test
result shall be recorded in terms of these identified Lots.
ANNEXURE 201C
MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT OF PROCESSES
1. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with the requirements of the Contract for control of production and service
provision, the Contractor shall develop detailed process descriptions/procedures for the
following processes.
1.1 ROADWORKS
a) Clearing, Topsoil Removal and Respreading
f) Subgrade Preparation
g) Sub-base Construction
h) Basecourse Construction
1.2 DRAINAGE
a) Culvert Installation
1.4 BRIDGEWORKS
a) Fabrication and Erection of Steel Beams
f) Falsework Construction
g) Formwork Construction
h) Reinforcement Installation
p) Pile Driving
q) Abutment Protection
1.5 ELECTRICAL
a) Lighting Pole Manufacturing, Base and Pole Installation
c) Rubberised Seal
b) Appropriate separate and dry storage for hydrated lime and any other filler.
(i) calibration of bitumen feed over full range of feed rates and
temperatures
(ii) regular documented checks on bitumen feed rate at operating
temperature (1/week)
(iii) establishment of conformance limits for feed rates
(iv) establishment of action plans in event of non-conformance
c) Mixing
d) Preparation of surface
g) Compaction
i) Protection of work
The process descriptions shall address, but not be limited to, the following:
a) the sequence of operations;
f) materials to be used;
j) how the process will be monitored to ensure its continuing suitability; and
k) records to be maintained.
ANNEXURE 201D
VALIDATION OF PROCESSES FOR PRODUCTION AND SERVICE PROVISION
1.1.1 SURVEYING
a) Compliance with the criteria detailed in Specification SERIES 100 - SURVEY
INFORMATION.
d) Survey equipment.
1.1.2 PRESTRESSING
1.1.3 GALVANISING
1.1.5 WELDING
1.1.7 PAINTING
ANNEXURE 201E
REQUIREMENTS FOR SELECTED CRITICAL SUBCONTRACTS
Subcontractors for the following critical processes must have Third Party Certification of
their Quality Management System to AS/NZS ISO 9001 for the manufacture and supply
of:
Aggregate
Asphalt / placement
Bitumen products
Concrete
Limestone
Pavement marking
Rockbase
Sealing
Steel fabrication
Steel reinforcing
Structural Components for Bridges including, but not limited to, beams, bearings,
expansion joints and piles
All edits to downloaded TDP documents shall be tracked (most word processing
software allows this to be done automatically). Deletions shall be struck through e.g.
example. Insertions shall be in italics e.g. example. If all information relating to a clause
is deleted then the clause number should be retained and the words "NOT USED"
should be inserted.
The proposed documents with tracked changes shall be submitted to the Project
Manager for review, prior to printing the final batch of documents. When this final
printing is carried out, the tracked changes option is to be turned off.
The list of elements must be appropriately amended to suit the requirements of the
particular works.
The list of processes must be amended to suit the requirements of the particular works.
The list of elements must be appropriately amended to suit the requirements of the
particular works.
The list of elements must be appropriately amended to suit the requirements of the
particular works.
6. AS CONSTRUCTED INFORMATION