Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The title of a book that was recently published in the UK, Language in Danger: How Lan-
guage Loss Threatens(1) Our Future by Andrew Dalby (Penguin Press) may be self-
explanatory. The author claims(2) that a language becomes extinct every two weeks and
that, at this rate(3), half of the world's languages will have disappeared by the end of this
century. This, Dalby believes, is a cause for alarm.
Look at Latin!
Certainly, Language in Danger will provide readers with plenty of food for thought(8).
Languages disappear for different reasons. Some, like the local languages of Tasmania,
simply died as their speakers were massacred, while the invasion of the Spaniards finished
off the Aztec languages of Mexico. Today English is the language of cultural domination. Its
popularity (which is, to use a French term, the "raison d'etre" for a magazine like Speak Up)
is destroying other languages, in the same way that the spread (9) of Latin was disastrous for
Punic, Gaulic and Etruscan. The reasons were very similar: Latin, like English today, was the
language of social advancement and parents encouraged their children to learn it. English, as
we all know, has become the language of the academic world, trade (10), science and the
internet. It is the most popular of what Dalby calls "the 11 languages of mass
communication," which are learnt by about half of the world's population. Dalby estimates
that 700 million people now speak English fluently, while 1,800 million speak it competently.
What we lose
Yet Dalby doesn't see the amazing success of English as a cause for celebration. He
argues(11) that the death of any language is negative. The things that get lost include local
knowledge of the natural world, an alternative view of life and a source of new words for the
surviving languages, which will stagnate if they cease to interact with the others. Of course,
language is also political: Mahatma Gandhi considered English to be a "cultural usurper" and,
like colonialism itself, it was to be resisted. But, as Dalby observes, Gandhi made his appeal
against English in English!