0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
71 vizualizări1 pagină
The Sandiganbayan has jurisdiction over cases involving violations of RA 3019 and RA 1379 committed by local government officials, including municipal mayors. While municipal mayors are not specifically included in the list under RA 7975, as amended by RA 8249, their position is classified as Salary Grade 27. This classification is based on the nature of their functions and responsibilities, not their actual salary amount. For Mayor Binay and Mayor Magsaysay, the Sandiganbayan has jurisdiction over the cases against them for alleged violations of anti-graft laws, even if complaints were initially filed with other courts. Jurisdiction is determined by law, not by agreements between parties.
The Sandiganbayan has jurisdiction over cases involving violations of RA 3019 and RA 1379 committed by local government officials, including municipal mayors. While municipal mayors are not specifically included in the list under RA 7975, as amended by RA 8249, their position is classified as Salary Grade 27. This classification is based on the nature of their functions and responsibilities, not their actual salary amount. For Mayor Binay and Mayor Magsaysay, the Sandiganbayan has jurisdiction over the cases against them for alleged violations of anti-graft laws, even if complaints were initially filed with other courts. Jurisdiction is determined by law, not by agreements between parties.
The Sandiganbayan has jurisdiction over cases involving violations of RA 3019 and RA 1379 committed by local government officials, including municipal mayors. While municipal mayors are not specifically included in the list under RA 7975, as amended by RA 8249, their position is classified as Salary Grade 27. This classification is based on the nature of their functions and responsibilities, not their actual salary amount. For Mayor Binay and Mayor Magsaysay, the Sandiganbayan has jurisdiction over the cases against them for alleged violations of anti-graft laws, even if complaints were initially filed with other courts. Jurisdiction is determined by law, not by agreements between parties.
120681-83, Mayor Jejomar Binay was charged before the Sandiganbayan
with the following: one for violation of Art 220 of the RPC (Illegal Use of Public Funds), and two for violation of Sec 3(e) of RA 3019 (giving undue favor to private parties). The informations alleged that the acts constituting these crimes were committed in 1987 during Binay’s incumbency as Mayor of Makati, then a municipality of Metro Manila. Binay argued that the Sandiganbayan has no jurisdiction over the cases because he ought to have been classified with a salary grade lower than Grade 27; at the time of the commission of the offenses charged he was paid a salary which merits a grade lower than Grade 27. In G.R. No. 128136, Mario Magsaysay, Mayor of the Municipality of San Pascual, Batangas along with other officials were charged with violation of Sec 3(e) and (g) of R.A.3019 for overpaying Vicente de la Rosa of TDR Construction for the landscaping project. Informations were filed before the RTC of Batangas City and before the Sandiganbayan. Magsaysay moved to quash the Crim. Case filed before the Sandiganbayan because the same complaints has already been filed with the RTC. Issue: WON the Sandiganbayan has jurisdiction over the cases. Held: Yes. R.A. 7975 (took effect on May 16, 1995) as amended by RA. 8249 (took effect on Feb 8, 1997) specified that the exclusive original jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan over cases involving violations of RA 3019, as amended, RA 1379, and Chapter II, Sec 2, Title VII of the RPC when the principal accused includes officials of the executive branch occupying the positions of regional director and higher, otherwise classified as grade “27” and higher, of the Compensation and Position Classification Act of 1989 (RA 6758) with enumeration as to officials specifically included. Even if the municipal mayor is not specifically included in the list and despite the fact that the actual salary received is not equivalent to grade 27, the classification of salary grades should not be based on the actual amount of salary received but on the nature of the functions performed by the official concerned - the level of difficulty, responsibilities, and qualification requirements thereof -- relative to that of another position. It is the official’s Grade that determines his or her salary, not the other way around. In the Index of Occupational Services, Position Titles and Salary Grades prepared by the DBM lists the municipal Mayor under SG 27. As to the case of Magsaysay, Sandiganbayan was not ousted of its jurisdiction even if the information was first filed in the RTC. RTC did not have jurisdiction in the first place as provided in R.A. 7975. Estoppel could not be invoked because jurisdiction is determined by law and not by the consent or agreement of the parties. A filing of a complaint with one court does not prevent the plaintiff from filing the same with the competent court. This does not amount to forum shopping since the only authority of the first court was to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. The filing of another complaint with the Sandiganbayan does not amount to double jeopardy. There can be no double jeopardy where the accused entered a plea in a court that had no jurisdiction. (Jejomar Binay v Sandiganbayan G.R. Nos. 120681-83. Oct 1, 1999)