Sunteți pe pagina 1din 8

bs_bs_banner

Pain Medicine 2014; 15: 1222–1229


Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

ACUTE PAIN & PERIOPERATIVE PAIN SECTION

Original Research Article


Incidence of Chronic Postsurgical Pain (CPSP)
after General Surgery

Christian J.P. Simanski, MD, PhD,*# Astrid Althaus, Abstract


Dr Dipl Psych,†# Sascha Hoederath, MD,‡
Kerry W. Kreutz, MD,† Petra Hoederath, MD,§ Objective. This study investigated the incidence
Rolf Lefering, PhD,¶ Carolina Pape-Köhler, MD,**
and determinants of chronic postsurgical pain
and Edmund A.M. Neugebauer, PhD†
(CPSP) in a general surgical patient population.

*Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Design. This is a prospective cross-sectional study
Cologne-Merheim Medical Center (CMMC), University at a university-affiliated clinic/level 1 trauma center.
of Witten/Herdecke; †Institute for Research in Patients were followed at least 1 year postopera-
Operative Medicine (IFOM), University of tively. By surgical discipline, procedures were
Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany; ‡Clinic of 50% orthopedic/trauma, 33% general (abdominal/
Surgery and Orthopaedics, Kantonales Spital Grabs, visceral), and 17% vascular.
Grabs; §Clinic of Neurosurgery, Kantonsspital St.
Setting. All patients admitted during one year
Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; ¶Biometrics and
(N = 3020) were eligible. Exclusion criteria were cog-
Statistics, Institute for Research in Operative Medicine nitive impairment, communication/language barrier,
(IFOM); **Department of Abdominal, Vascular, and nonoperative treatment, and refusal to participate. A
Transplant Surgery, Cologne Merheim Medical Center CPSP questionnaire was completed. Step-by-step
(CMMC), University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, analysis followed with a 2nd questionnaire to detect
Germany CPSP with numeric rating scale (NRS) pain intensity
≥3. Finally, individual follow-up examinations were
Reprint requests to: Christian Johannes Paul performed.
Simanski, MD, Department of Trauma and Orthopedic
Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center (CMMC), Results. 911 patients responded (30.2%). 522 com-
University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimerstrasse plained of pain intensity ≥3 on NRS (scale 0–10). The
200, Cologne 51109, Germany. Tel: second step identified 214 patients with chronic
0049-221-8907-13018; Fax: 0049-221-8907-3085; pain (NRS ≥3, mean 29 months postoperatively). On
E-mail: Christian.Simanski@uni-koeln.de. final examination, 83 CPSP patients (14.8%) were
identified. By surgical discipline, 28% were general,
#Both authors contributed equally. 15% vascular, and 57% trauma/orthopedic surgery.
Most oftenly cited pain sites were joint (49.4%),
The authors declare no conflicts of interest in the incisional/scar (37.7%), and nerve pain (33.7%).
publication of this study. By procedure, patients underwent pelvic surgery,
colon surgery, laparoscopies, inguinal herniorrha-
Author’s contributions : CJPS, EAMN, KK, SH, and PH phies, arthroscopies, and hardware extractions. All
developed the study, design, and research. CJPS, patients in the “laborer” and “unemployed” catego-
EAMN, and RL supervised conduction of the study. ries reported chronic pain.
CJPS, KK, SH, PH, and RL collected and managed
the data. CJPS and AA drafted the manuscript, Conclusion. Bias due to study design and/or het-
contributing equally. All other authors contributed erogeneity of patients is possible, but there was a
substantially to its revision. CJPS takes responsibility high CPSP rate after 2 years both generally and
for the paper as a whole. RL provided statistical particularly in orthopedic/trauma (57%) patients.
advice on the study design and analyzed the data Both “major” and “minor” surgical procedures led
along with CJPS, KK, SH, CP-K, and AA. to CPSP.

1222

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article-abstract/15/7/1222/1878744


by guest
on 24 February 2018
Incidence of CPSP After General Surgery

Key Words. Risk Factors; Pain Management; hospital, the questionnaire was modified. The study was
Chronic Post-Surgical Pain (CPSP); Persistent Pain; approved by our local ethics committee. All patients were
Prospective Study treated under the conditions of the Helsinki II declaration
and all subjects provided informed consent to partici-
pate. Exclusion criteria were cognitive impairment,
Introduction communication/language barrier in non-native speakers,
non-operative treatment, and refusal to participate. To
The development of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) clarify whether the pain reported on the first questionnaire
appears to be a multifactorial process. It is influenced by (mean 19 months post OP, Range: 13–26 months;
physical, psychological, genetic, and social factors [1,2]. SD ± 3.5 months) required further investigation (numerical
Numerous studies have investigated the process of “how rating scale NRS ≥3; scale 0–10), and whether it appeared
acute pain becomes chronic” after various interventions related to surgery, a second analysis was performed by
[2–4]. Multiple surgical procedures within a single periph- examining patient charts and performing telephone inter-
eral nerve distribution lead to high incidence of CPSP views (Figure 1). Thus, we differentiated patients treated
[2,3]. Patients complain of CPSP in 5–65% after thora- operatively versus non-operatively, and whether a nonex-
cotomy [5,6], 30–50% after cardiac surgery [7,8], 5–63% istent, possible, or definite connection between the surgi-
after hernia surgery [9,10], 11–57% after mastectomy cal intervention and current pain symptoms was present.
[11,12], and 30–85% after amputations [13]. Quoted rates Patients with possible or definite chronic pain related to
of incidence for CPSP vary widely, depending on study surgery were invited to return to our clinic where a follow
design, single or multi center participation, clinic level of up examination was performed to assess the symptoms
care, surgical expertise, etc. Severe acute postoperative of CPSP (mean 29 months post OP, Range: 24–35
pain seems to be a risk factor for the development of months; SD ± 3.5 months).
chronic pain [3,4]. In more than 115,000 patients,
Gerbershagen et al. found that very high pain intensity on Definition of CPSP
the first postoperative day was reported after “minor”
interventions, e.g. appendectomy, cholecystectomy, hem- We defined CPSP similarly to Macrae [20]: 1) Pain that
orrhoidectomy, and tonsillectomy, as well as after major develops after surgery, 2) where other etiologies have
orthopedic surgery [14]. Analysis of the literature con- been ruled out, and 3) exacerbation of a pre-existing
firmed high incidence rates of CPSP after these proce- problem as cause for the pain has been ruled out. Unlike
dures [15–17]. Macrae, we defined CPSP as postoperative pain lasting
longer than 12 months, according to recommendations of
In many studies patients were recruited from tertiary other sources [21].
centers with specialized surgeons, or pain intensities were
measured only on the first postoperative day [14]. It is thus Evaluation
possible that the results exhibit bias, and do not reflect
actual CPSP incidence. In addition, it is important to Evaluation of the questionnaires, telephone interviews, and
examine such rates in the general surgical departments of physical examinations was primarily descriptive. Percent-
primary and secondary care centers, since in our nation at ages refer to the total number of patients with pain requiring
least, patients are generally treated there and not in spe- intervention, i.e. with intensities on VAS/NRS ≥3 (scale
cialized surgical centers [18,19]. The aim of this study was 0–10 where 0 = no pain, 10 = maximum imaginable pain)
to determine the incidence of chronic postoperative pain [22]. Differences in frequency were tested with the Fisher’s
(CPSP) in a general surgical patient population of an aca- exact test, and ranking with the Mann-Whitney U test
demic university-affiliated hospital, and to analyze this (P < 0.05). Analysis was carried out using the SPSS soft-
data for specific contributing factors. ware package (version 17.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill.,
United States).
Patients and Methods
Standardized Pain Measurement, Documentation,
For this cross-sectional study, we included all 3,020 and Therapy
patients admitted to our facility (vascular, abdominal/
visceral, orthopedic/trauma) over a one year period An independent “study nurse” explained the study back-
(1st August until 31st July). Relative to surgical specia- ground and benefits of the routine daily pain measurement
lity, the patient distribution was 50% undergoing or and documentation procedures to all patients. The routine
thopedic/trauma, 33% abdominal/visceral, and 17% vas- clinical documentation of pain intensity comprised assess-
cular procedures. ments at least twice daily (morning and evening) using a
visual analog scale (VAS, 0–10) at rest and with movement
Development of the Questionnaire (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) [23]. Pain
measurement on weight bearing was performed during
The questionnaire was tested for comprehensiveness, physiotherapy or mobilization on the hospital floor,
clarity, and completion time with a first draft in our clinic and included coughing, stair climbing, or standing for
during a pilot phase of the study. After extensive discus- more than 30 minutes. The VAS pain intensity scores
sions by the “integrated acute pain working group” of our were documented by the responsible nursing staff on

1223

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article-abstract/15/7/1222/1878744


by guest
on 24 February 2018
Simanski et al.

Time point of analysis (TP)


All surgical patients TP O: Hospital stay
n = 3020

First Questionnaire TP 1: Ø 19 months


n = 911 post OP

Pain No pain
NRS-pain intensity ≥3 pts. NRS-pain intensity <3 pts.:
n = 522 n = 389

Pain Pain
Pain
- unclear reason
+ - unclear reason TP 2: Ø 29
n=337 n = 185 months
n = 16 post OP
No
CPSP
n = 83
Chronic pain
n = 115
pain Pain
- unclear reason
+
n= 123
25.9% 35.8% 38.3% n =201

calculated calculated calculated


Chronic pain CPSP No pain
n =72 n = 52 n = 77
35.8% 25.9% 38.3%

Chronic pain No pain


CPSP
n = 187 n = 589
n = 135

14.8% 20.5% 64.7%

Figure 1 Flow chart.

postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15, 20, 25, 30, and NRS ≥3, and 389 patients (42.7%) reported a NRS <3.
the day of discharge. Standardized pain therapy and pain The analysis of second questionnaire showed the same
management were based on the national guidelines [24] rate of incidence (57.3%), 337 patients reported NRS ≥3
and available standards for each surgical discipline. Addi- after an average period of 29 months postoperatively
tional pharmacologic intervention was included if the VAS (range 24–35 months, SD ± 3.5 months) (Figure 1). More
intensity was ≥3, or held by explicit request of patients, i.e. women than men showed chronic pain symptoms.
“pain acceptance” [22,25]. 51.8% of the CPSP patients (N = 43) and 58.3% of the
chronic pain patients (N = 67) were of female gender.
Results The distribution of the 321 “pain patients” (NRS ≥3)
according to the surgical discipline showed that more
All patients admitted to our general surgical university- than 55% of the trauma/ orthopedic patients suffered
affiliated clinic over the period of one year (N = 3,020) chronic pain (CP) and more than 57% of that group suf-
were questioned about the course of postoperative pain fered CPSP (Tables 2 and 3). After follow-up examina-
by follow up over an average of 19 months (SD ± 3.5 tion, 83 (14.8%) patients exhibited CPSP (Figure 1 and
months). 911 questionnaires were fully completed Table 1), and in 16 patients the relationship between the
(response rate 30.2%). Slightly more men (52.8%) than chronic pain symptoms and the surgical procedure was
women (47.2%) responded. The mean age of patients unclear (e.g., burning pain with projection into the ingui-
was 54 years (±17.6 years). The female average was 5 nal region in a post-herniorrhaphy patient with coexisting
years older than that of males (56.7 versus 51.7 years). coxarthrosis). These latter patients were referred to a
355 patients (39%) estimated their current state of health specialized pain clinic for further workup and treatment.
as “not so good” or “bad”. 665 patients (73%) reported 71.6% of patients in the CPSP group self-reported “not
“improved” or “unchanged” activities of daily living post- so good” and “bad” rates to describe their health status
operatively. Analysis of the initial questionnaire showed highest compared to the “chronic pain” and the “No
that 522 patients (57.3%) reported a pain intensity on pain” group (Table 4). The patients reporting CPSP, later

1224

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article-abstract/15/7/1222/1878744


by guest
on 24 February 2018
Incidence of CPSP After General Surgery

Table 1 Incidence of CPSP in general surgical patients

No CPSP (chronic pain,


CPSP (chronic no correlation to surgery)
postsurgical pain) in the vicinity of surgery? No pain

Number of patients N = 321 83 115 123


Percentage of 321 patients 25.9% 35.8% 38.3%
Percentage of 321 patients, total 57.3% of patients with 14.8% 20.5% 22.0%
NRS ≥ 3
Percentage of total respondents (N = 911) with completed 14.8% 20.5% 22.0 % + 42.7
questionnaires % = 64.7%

confirmed on follow-up examination, underwent various ployed” reported pain on NRS ≥3 more than 1 year after
interventions (Tables 1 and 2). Finally, the distribution of surgery. However, analysis of this social parameter within
CPSP patients according to surgical discipline was 28% the 6 months preceding the second questionnaire
general (abdominal/visceral) surgery, 15% vascular showed, almost 72% (N = 231 of 321) of the respon-
surgery and 57% trauma/orthopedic surgery. When dents had yet returned to work or were retired, 22%
asked for the localization of pain (multiple answers pos- (N = 71) were temporarily incapable of working, and 6%
sible), the most frequent response was joints/lower (N = 19) were signed off work permanently. Analyzing
extremities and back (Figure 2). The majority of the ethnic factors, 90% of patients were born in our country
patients was married (61.7%) and retired (Figure 3). All and of Caucasian race. According to responses by
patients who reported themselves as “laborer” or “unem- CPSP patients (multiple answers possible) over the

Table 2 Distribution of CPSP patients by surgical discipline (N = 83)

Trauma/
Surgical discipline General (visceral/ abdominal) Vascular orthopedic

Size of Minor Major Minor Major Minor Major


procedure
Type of Lap Hern. Ing. hern. Other Colon e.g. e.g. Arthrosc. Poly.
procedure repair rep. procedures Shunt Bypass
No. of 7 5 5 3 3 7 12 7 25 9
procedure
CPSP 8% 6% 6% 4% 4% 8% 15% 8% 30% 11%
Percentage
CPSP 28 15 57
Percentage
per Discipline

Lap = laparoscopy; Hern. repair = hernial repair; Ing.hern.rep. = inguinal hernia repair; Arthrosc. = arthroscopy; Poly. = polytrauma;
CPSP = chronic post surgical pain.

Table 3 Patient-distribution related to the surgical discipline after the second questionnaire, mean 29
months postoperatively (range 24–35 months, SD 3.5 months)

Surgical discipline No pain (N = . . .) CPSP (N = . . .) CP (N = . . .)

General (visceral/abdominal) 53.6% (66) 28.9% (24) 32.2% (37)


Vascular 11.4% (14) 13.3% (11) 13% (15)
Orthopedic 17.1% (21) 22.9% (19) 45.2% (52)
Trauma 17.9% (22) 34.9% (29) 9.6% (11)
N= 123 83 115

CPSP = chronic post surgical pain; CP = chronic pain independent from the surgical site; SD = standard deviation.

1225

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article-abstract/15/7/1222/1878744


by guest
on 24 February 2018
Simanski et al.

Table 4 How you would describe your health


status in general actually? (Second questionnaire,

Percentage
ø29 months postoperatively)

Patient Group No pain CPSP CP

“Excellent” .8% 0% 0%
“Very good” 4.2% 0% 1.8%
“Not so good” 41.7% 59.3% 50%
“Bad” 4.2% 12.3% 16.7%
Σ = “Not so good”/“Bad” 45.9% 71.6% 66.7%
N= 120 81 114 Occupation

CPSP = chronic post surgical pain; CP = chronic pain indepen- Figure 3 Demographic data by occupation (N =
dent from the surgical site.
337 patients).

subsequent 4 weeks, pain was described as joint


(49.4%), incisional/ scar (37.7%) and nerve pain (33.7%) years (mean 29.65 ± 3.5 months). Fortier et al. found a
(Figure 4). similarly high incidence of CPSP (13%) in children [27].
Social factors may contribute to CPSP. All patients in the
Discussion categories “laborer” and “unemployed” reported pain
intensity on NRS ≥3 more than 1 year after surgery [22].
Severe postoperative pain is considered a predictor of This could be due to the physical and stressful activity
CPSP. Our current study shows that in general surgical required by this occupational group (construction, metal/
patients admitted to a university-affiliated clinic over a one iron processing, etc.) resulting in, for example more joint
year period, despite existing standard pain therapy algo- degeneration, which is compounded by lower incomes
rithms (systemic multimodal pain therapy) [24,26], one out [28], lower educational levels, or the desire for higher
of three patients experienced pain requiring intervention pensions [29,30]. In contrast to the study by MacWilliam
(VAS/NRS ≥3) longer than one year after clinical dis- et al., ethnic factors did not appear to affect CPSP in our
charge. 14.8% of patients reported pain directly related to study, however, since 90% of our patients were Cauca-
surgery, implying a causal relationship after more than 2 sian, a study bias due to study design cannot be excluded

Figure 2 Pain localization


(patient-reported) from question-
naire: “Where do you feel
pain?” (multiple answers possible)
(N = 667).

1226

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article-abstract/15/7/1222/1878744


by guest
on 24 February 2018
Incidence of CPSP After General Surgery

cholecystectomy, etc.), as well as after “major” orthopedic


surgery, (e.g. spinal fusion over more than 3 segments,
internal fixation of the acetabulum, etc.). In addition, of the
top 40 surgical procedures with the highest intensity of
postoperative pain, 22 were trauma/orthopedic interven-
tions [14].. Other studies have confirmed that a large
number of patients develop post-traumatic chronic pain
after thoracic or pelvic injury [41–43]. Our study confirmed
a high percentage of CPSP patients after these proce-
dures, as well as after less invasive procedures (e.g.
laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopy, inguinal her-
niorrhaphy, arthroscopy, hardware extraction, Table 2).
However, selection bias cannot be excluded due to the
low recurrence rate of the first questionnaire (911 answers
of 3020 patients, 30.2%). In addition, we wanted to
assess the incidence of CPSP in patients treated by a
group of responsible surgeons of all different education
levels within a university-based general surgical depart-
Figure 4 Questionnaire: “In your opinion, where
ment to yield a more objective impression of CPSP rates.
does the pain come from?” (multiple answers The published data of other studies have often been col-
possible). lected in specialized centers with the most experienced
specialists participating.

[29]. Patients reported joint pain (49.4%), incisional pain In the CPSP group, 11% were polytraumatized patients,
(37.7%), and nerve pain (33.7%) more than one year after requiring multiple operations. A recent study confirmed a
surgery (multiple answers possible, Figure 4). A recent correlation between CPSP and the need for a 2nd proce-
systematic review confirmed incisional pain and dure after mastectomy [44]. Other authors have also
neuropathic pain as major causes of CPSP [31]. This is reported high rates of CPSP in patients after trauma
often associated with an intraoperative nerve injury or surgery [28].
resection [9,32] and a potentially avoidable complication.
Töns and Schumpelick showed less neuropathic pain Study Limitations
after nerve and soft tissue protection was implemented
during inguinal herniorrhaphy [3,33]. Other studies have The study design did not enable collection of patient data
confirmed that postoperative incisional pain can become regarding preoperative health and pain status. We
chronic. Wilder-Smith showed that the pain threshold for achieved a questionnaire response rate of only 30.2%;
perception of painful stimuli is reduced during revision thus, selection bias cannot be excluded. Although every
procedures (e.g. scar revisions, neuroma resections), patient was treated using our facility specific multimodal
causing allodynia [34]. Furthermore, not only is mechani- pain policies, and pain scores were documented using a
cally induced neuropathy important, but there is also a role specific documentation system, in some cases documen-
for inflammatory immunological components. Post- tation of the pain intensity was incomplete. We collected
surgical inflammatory neuropathy was found histologically data for over 2 years postoperatively (29 months ± 3.5
via nerve biopsy in 21 nerves resected from CPSP months), but the range of follow up dates was wide,
patients, regardless of the presence of mechanical injury complicated by the difficulties in making follow up
[35]. The most consistent risk factor for CPSP is severe appointments. The follow-up physical examination identi-
acute postoperative pain [3,4,9,36,37]. It is hypothesized fied 83 CPSP patients, but after the 3 patient interviews,
that persistent peripheral nociceptive input from injured we also confirmed that 123 patients did not experience
nerves causes neuroplastic changes in the CNS, resulting chronic pain. The physical examination identified 16 cases
in nervous hyperexcitability [4,36]. Some authors have in whom the origin of chronic pain was unclear; these
reported that use of intraoperative nerve blocks in proce- patients were referred to a special pain clinic.
dures known to cause severe postoperative pain (e.g.
thoracotomy) significantly decrease pain up to 6 months Conclusion
postoperatively [38,39]. Thus, interdisciplinary pain man-
agement allows use of additional regional anesthetic mea- This study confirms a high incidence of CPSP of 14.8%
sures with the goal of disrupting this acute to chronic more than 2 years postoperatively. Despite standardized
transformation mechanism [40]. Our patients received pain therapy algorithms in our facility, one in three patients
postoperative pain therapy according to standardized experienced severe postoperative pain requiring further
national S3 guidelines, specific to each surgical discipline intervention (VAS/NRS ≥3). The rate of patients developing
[24]. In an analysis of more than 115,000 patients under- CPSP after trauma or orthopedic procedures was high
going 179 surgical procedures, Gerbershagen et al. (57%), but because of our study design, selection bias
reported that high intensity postoperative pain is often cannot be excluded. The CPSP patients evaluated their
reported after “minor” interventions (e.g., appendectomy, pain as chronic incisional, articular, or neuropathic pain.

1227

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article-abstract/15/7/1222/1878744


by guest
on 24 February 2018
Simanski et al.

Thus, our analysis focused on these pain types. An 12 Tasmuth T, Estlanderb AM, Kalso E. Effect of present
iatrogenic nerve lesion/therapeutic resection is a poten- pain and mood on the memory of past postoperative
tial cause, as is inflammatory/immunological reactions pain in women treated surgically for breast cancer.
without mechanical damage. In addition to major Pain 1996;68(2–3):343–7.
orthopedic interventions, minor surgical procedures (e.g.
laparoscopies, arthroscopies, hardware extractions, etc.) 13 Hanley MA, Jensen MP, Smith DG, et al.
can also cause CPSP. Social factors may play a role in the Preamputation pain and acute pain predict chronic
development of CPSP as well. All “laborer” and “unem- pain after lower extremity amputation. J Pain 2007;
ployed” patients demonstrated intervention-requiring pain 8(2):102–9.
intensity (NRS ≥3) more than 1 year after surgery.
14 Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, et al.
References Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: A prospec-
1 Hinrichs-Rocker A, Schulz K, Järvinen I, et al. Psycho- tive cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures.
logical predictors and correlates for chronic post- Anesthesiology 2013;118(4):934–44.
surgical pain (CPSP)—A systematic review. Eur J Pain
2009;13(7):719–30. 15 Bisgaard T, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H. From acute to
chronic pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A
2 Schnabel A, Pogatzki-Zahn E. Predictors of chronic prospective follow-up analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol
pain following surgery. What do we know? Schmerz 2005;40(11):1358–64.
2010;24(5):517–31.
16 Lundblad H, Kreicbergs A, Jansson KA. Prediction of
3 Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsur- persistent pain after total knee replacement for osteo-
gical pain: Risk factors and prevention. Lancet arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90(2):166–
2006;367(9522):1618–25. 71.

4 Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Chronic pain as an outcome of 17 Nikolajsen L, Brandsborg B, Lucht U, Jensen TS,
surgery.A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology Kehlet H. Chronic pain following total hip arthroplasty:
2000;93:1123–33. A nationwide questionnaire study. Acta Anaesthesiol
Scand 2006;50(4):495–500.
5 Gotoda Y, Kambara N, Sakai T, et al. The morbidity,
time course and predictive factors for persistent 18 Neugebauer EAM, Sauerland S, Keck V, Simanski C,
post thoracotomy pain. Eur J Pain 2001;5(1):89– Witte J. Surgical pain management. A Germany-wide
96. survey including the effect of clinical guidelines.
Chirurg 2003;74(3):235–8.
6 Gottschalk A, Orchroch A. Clinical and demo-
graphic characteristics of patients with chronic pain 19 Statistisches Bundesamt, Bonn. Available at: http://
after major thoracotomy. Clin J Pain 2008;24(8):708– www.gbe-bund.de/oowa921-install/servlet/oowa/
16. aw92/dboowasys921.xwdevkit/xwd_init?gbe
.isgbetol/xs_start_neu/&p_aid=i&p_aid=24558384&
7 Gjeilo KH, Klepstad P, Wahba A, Lydersen S, Stenseth nummer=676&p_sprache=D&p_indsp=-&p_aid
R. Chronic pain after cardiac surgery: A prospective =78320705 (accessed February 2014).
study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010;54(1):70–
8. 20 Macrae WA. Chronic pain after surgery. Br J Anaesth
2001;87(1):88–98.
8 Lahtinen P, Kokki H, Hynynen M. Pain after cardiac
surgery: A prospective cohort study of 1-year inci- 21 Gerbershagen HJ. Transition from acute to chronic
dence and intensity. Anesthesiology 2006;105(4): postsurgical pain. Physiology, risk factors and preven-
794–800. tion. Schmerz 2013;27(1):81–93.

9 Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H. Prospective study 22 Lempa M, Koch G, Neugebauer EAM, Köhler L, Troidl
of chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg H. How much pain is tolerable? Target expectations of
1999;86(12):1528–31. surgical patients for pain therapy. Chirurg 2000;
71(10):1263–9.
10 Poobalan AS, Bruce J, King PM, et al. Chronic pain
and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair. 23 Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974;
Br J Surg 2001;88(8):1122–6. 2(7889):1127–31.

11 Hickey OT, Burke SM, Hafeez P, et al. Severity of 24 Laubenthal H, Neugebauer E. Deutsche
acute pain after breast surgery is associated with the Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Schmerztherapie
likelihood of subsequently developing persistent pain. (DIVS) e.V. S3-Leitlinie. Behandlung akuter perio-
Clin J Pain 2010;26(7):556–60. perativer und posttraumatischer Schmerzen; 2009.

1228

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article-abstract/15/7/1222/1878744


by guest
on 24 February 2018
Incidence of CPSP After General Surgery

Available at: http://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx 34 Wilder-Smith OHG, Tassonyi E, Crul B, Arendt-Nielsen


_szleitlinien/041-001_S3_Behandlung_akuter L. Quantitative sensory testing and human surgery:
_perioperativer_und_posttraumatischer_Schmerzen Effects of analgesic management on postoperative
_aktualisierte_Fassung_04-2009_05-2011.pdf neuroplasticity. Anesthesiology 2003;98:1214–22.
(accessed February 2014).
35 Staff NP, Engelstad J, Klein CJ, et al. Post-surgical
25 Simanski C, Neugebauer E. Postoperative pain inflammatory neuropathy. Brain 2010;133:2866–80.
therapy. Chirurg 2003;74(3):254–74.
36 Basbaum AI. Spinal mechanisms of acute and persis-
26 Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to tent pain. Reg Anesth 1999;24:59–67.
improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 2002;183:630–
41. 37 Katz J, Seltzer Z. Transition from acute to chronic
postsurgical pain: risk factors and protective factors.
27 Fortier MA, Chou J, Maurer EL, Kain ZN. Acute to Expert Rev Neurother 2009;9:723–44.
chronic postoperative pain in children: Preliminary
findings. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46:1700–5. 38 Andreae MH, Andreae DA. Local anaesthetics and
regional anaesthesia for preventing chronic pain after
28 Holmes A, Williamson O, Hogg M, Arnold C, surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;10:
O’Donnell ML. Determinants of chronic pain 3 years CD007105.
after moderate or serious injury. Pain Med 2013;
14(3):336–44. 39 Obata H, Saito S, Fujita N, et al. Epidural block with
mepivacaine before surgery reduces long-term post-
29 MacWilliam CH, Yood MU, Verner JJ, McCarthy BD, thoracotomy pain. Can J Anaesth 1999;46:1127–32.
Ward RE. Patient-related risk factors that predict poor
outcome after total hip replacement. Health Serv Res 40 Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, et al. Efficacy of
1996;31:623–38. postoperative epidural analgesia—A metanalysis.
JAMA 2003;290(18):2455–63.
30 Williamson O, Gabbe B, Cameron P. Predictors of
persistent moderate or severe pain following orthope- 41 Katz J, Jackson M, Kavanagh BP, Sandler AN. Acute
dic injury: Prospective cohort study. J Orthop Trauma pain after thoracic surgery predicts long-term post-
2009;23:139–44. thoracotomy pain. Clin J Pain 1996;12(1):50–5.

31 Haroutiunian S, Nikolajsen L, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS. 42 Meyhoff CS, Thomson CH, Rasmussen LS, Nielsen
The neuropathic component in persistent postsurgical PR. High incidence of chronic pain following surgery
pain: A systematic literature review. Pain 2013;154: for pelvic fracture. Clin J Pain 2006;22(2):167–72.
95–102.
43 Perttunen K, Tasmuth T, Kalso E. Chronic pain after
32 Benedetti F, Amanzio M, Casadio C, et al. Postopera- thoracic surgery: A follow-up study. Acta Anaesthesiol
tive pain and superficial abdominal reflexes after pos- Scand 1999;43:563–7.
terolateral thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:
207–10. 44 Bruce J, Thornton AJ, Powell R, et al. Psychological,
surgical and sociodemographic predictors of pain out-
33 Töns C, Schumpelick V. The ramus genitalis comes after breast cancer surgery: A population-
syndrome following hernia repair. A clinical study based cohort study. Pain 2014;155(2):232–43.
concerning its preventability. Chirurg 1990;61:441– doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.09.028. pii,
3. Epub ahead of print.

1229

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article-abstract/15/7/1222/1878744


by guest
on 24 February 2018

S-ar putea să vă placă și